Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 203

Draft:SwimSafe
''I, BelAThompson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' BelAThompson (talk) 02:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Done, but with some reservations. Make sure that you fix the promotional tones, BelAThompson, because I almost did not restore it because it read like a promotion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Niku Dutta
''I, 117.243.210.26, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 117.243.210.26 (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:50, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Gender and Sustainability
Karin Steen (talk) 08:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Karin Steen, it looks like the draft article wasn't deleted and was just moved to Draft:Gender and sustainability. You can edit it there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Should be an interesting topic - you may want to see if you can get any help from WikiProject Gender Studies, since this looks like it could be a pretty ambitious topic and getting help researching could be a definite boon. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Braselton
Article was work in progress, Yet to cite sources and was deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by RouterWhisper (talk • contribs) 10:56, 3 September 2015‎
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for people to write "jokey" articles about themselves and their friends. Read the policy on WP:Biographies of living persons. JohnCD (talk) 11:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I was about to say the same thing. To be honest, I'm mildly tempted to give RouterWhisper and Bkill7 WP:NOTHERE blocks. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Let's see whether they get the message and go and play somewhere else. JohnCD (talk) 11:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia
I moved a wikiproject and created a new one in its place because the previous one was inactive. I acknowledge that I did that incorrectly but now, the project I created in the old project's place was deleted and the old project was moved back. I have hours of code and frmatting invested and I would like that back. So i would appreciate it if you could restore my version and its three subpages (Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Members,Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Contests, Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Awards) and all of their talk pages into User:Tortle/Sandbox 2 so I can retrieve the code and possibly get it ready for a new name. Thanks -Tortle (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I recommend not restoring Tortle's new material until all of the original WikiProject has been restored and associated edits with its temporary renames (from WikiProject Wikipedia to Wikipedia:Defunct WikiProject Wikipedia and then to WikiProject Improving Wikipedia) have been corrected. Tortle's contribution to fixing these edits would be welcome and speed up the process. Liz  <font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400"Read! Talk! 23:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I will gladly help fix the original wikiproject and revert me edits, in fact, Ill start once I finish writing this but I do not see the benefit on waiting to restore the pages until cleanup of something else is done as that will just get my request buried over here. Thanks Tortle (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


 * All of the reverts are done User:Liz. I would appreciate if you or another admin can review my request. Tortle (talk) 01:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Tortle, I'm not sure exactly how to move the old page history, to be honest, since restoring it would just restore it to that specific page. I don't think that there's a way to move specific page histories. I know that RHaworth deleted it and he has more experience with undeletion, so I'm going to tag him and see if he knows how to do it (and can then tell me how to do it as well). I also have to admit that I'm slightly concerned that you're taking on what looks like it'd be a fairly big project, considering that you're a very new user with less than 3,000 edits. This doesn't mean that I won't do it, just more that I'm curious as to why you chose to do something like this as one of your first big projects. Mostly I just kind of want to hear the reason for it and if you have someone helping you with this, preferably someone who is used to creating new WikiProjects. Jusdafax looks like he'd be down for the task, as does several of the people at the WikiProject Council. Making a new WikiProject is a huge, HUGE effort and I'd greatly prefer that you at least have a mentor on call for this. Again, not saying no and the major issue here is just that I'm not sure how to (or if we can) move a deleted edit history or if we just have to cut/paste the content, but I would feel better knowing that you have someone to help you with the overall details. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:03, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm cut/pasting this here from my talk page, as Tortle approached me for REFUND help. My apologies to anyone that gets re-tagged in both places, mostly I just kind of want to try to keep a running tab of this in one location. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I was on Wikipedia some years back and I gained a lot of experience back then but honestly have lost some of it. I already set up the wikiproject page and I definetely do plan on getting some good members on board to help things along and give some good suggestions. And anyway, I might wait a while before rebooting it and by then, I would have more expreience. Thanks for responding so quickly and it was nice meeting you Tokyogirl79. Tortle (talk) 07:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Tokyogirl79, Im going to be making a lot of changes and starting fresh and mainly need the code. Is there a way for you to view the code and copy and paste it into my sandbox? Or is that not allowed or an issue? Thanks Tortle (talk) 07:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Nah, shouldn't be an issue and it's allowed. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm going to put the pages on different named things, just so it stays a little more orderly, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * OK, I've copied them to User:Tortle/Sandbox 2, User:Tortle/Sandbox 3, User:Tortle/Sandbox 4, User:Tortle/Sandbox 5. I'm going to post this info to the thread at the WP Council and let them know that you want people to help out. I'm not overly familiar with creating WikiProjects, but I don't think that you should include the bit about the founder in Sandbox 3. It kind of sounds a bit like WP:OWNERSHIP and also gives off the impression that you have abilities that an average reviewer would not. I don't know that I've ever really seen a WikiProject give its founder that much power over the others, to be honest. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Tokyogirl79, I mainly didnt want to add myself into the reviewer section because I wanted a place to explain that I could delete disruptive reviewers from the project but I think I could add myself as a reviewer and say that reviewers can decide to get rid of another with a vote or by consensus. Thanks again, Tortle (talk) 07:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * They are in the WP namespace - we don't need to have long discussions agonising over restoration. I have restored all Tortle's edits in the Wikipedia and Wikipedia_talk namespaces. I view service awards such as Looshpah IV Userbox and barnstars as out of keeping with the "grown-up" serious state that Wikipedia has now reached but if Tokyogirl or, who did several if not all their deletions, is willing to restore, then I have no objection. Tortle, try and use "show preview" more - the number of edits seem out of proportion to the actual work being done. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I have some concerns with that statement Tortle, Wikipedia is not a democracy. WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProject describes why membership statuses and exclusivity are inappropriate. WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProject explains the egalitarian more loosely associated nature of WikiProjects: Coordinators cannot be "forced" on an unwilling WikiProject — there must be consensus amongst its membership that the introduction of a coordination system will benefit the project and coordinators are not arbitrators or "leaders" of a WikiProject — all such decisions are still made by community consensus sum it up pretty well. Starting a WikiProject will not give you special status or "powers" within it, and the project will belong to the community. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 12:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Program for Research In Mathematics, Engineering and Science (PRIMES)
''I, Dodecahedronic, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dodecahedronic (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:The Program for Research In Mathematics, Engineering and Science (PRIMES). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Rishi Bisen
49.202.43.214 (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Rishi Bisen is an officer of Indian Revenue Service. He belongs to 2010 i.e. 64th batch if IRS. Mr. Bisen has done Bachelor of Engineering with Metallurgical Engineering branch from Govt. Engineering College Raipur which is now NIT Raipur. Before joining this service he worked in commercial tax and police department in Madhya Pradesh Government for short period. After completing his training from National Academy of Direct Taxes, Nagpur he started his carrier as Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, in MP-CG region.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
 * I have to say that I do not see any indication that Mr Bisen is notable enough, in Wikipedia's sense, to have an article. Please check out WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Google X
This page was deleted to make way for an article about an unrelated topic, however, it should be undeleted and should be added a disambiguation tag. (Unsure what exactly) - TheChampionMan1234 01:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC) -- TheChampionMan1234 01:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The old article looks like it was deleted at AfD back in 2013, since it closed as a merge to List of Google products. From what I can see, it looks like this is already in the list of discontinued products. There really isn't much to restore and I'm not really certain that we truly need a disambiguation page, to be honest. It looks like we only have two entries with this specific name and the AfD closed with the consensus that while it merited a page somewhere, it didn't really warrant its own entry. While he's not an admin, I do want to ping since he did a non-admin close. The page was redirected and this redirect was deleted by, so I'll ping him as well. Again, I just really don't know that this needs a separate entry outside of where it's already mentioned. Maybe a hatnote at the top of the current article at most. Here's the content of the page:

Google X was a project released by Google Labs on March 15, 2005 and rescinded a day later. It consisted of the traditional Google search bar, but it was made to look like the Dock user interface feature of Apple's Mac OS X operating system. Google did not release any official statement as to why the project was shut down. Although Google X has been taken down, several mirrors still exist. 


 * That's pretty much about it and given that this went through AfD (and there's really not enough to justify a disambiguation page), I'd prefer that we have the OK from the person who closed the AfD. He's not an admin, but I do trust his opinion enough to want his OK on this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the ping. The consensus at AfD was that the topic was not notable enough for a standalone article, so unless it can be shown that significant new information about the subject has been released or discovered since the AfD closed, that consensus should continue to have merit. As Tokyogirl79 mentions, essentially everything that was contained in the former article has been merged to List of Google products, so creating a standalone article without significant new information would be redundant. I would also agree with Tokyogirl that a disambiguation page is probably unnecessary. There would only be two entries, and Google X (the secret facility) is obviously the primary topic. If disambiguation is absolutely necessary, a hatnote would be preferred.


 * However, (and this is going to sound like me being a stickler for procedure, but I think it's important), Wikipedia's content licensing requires that all content be attributed to its respective authors. This attribution is usually supplied by the edit history of a page, which lists all the authors' names. When you copy text from one Wikipedia page to another (such as when merging content), certain steps need to be taken—the guideline for this is at Copying within Wikipedia. The bare minimum is a link to the source page in the edit summary at the destination page. But, this only works if the source page's edit history still exists with the names of the authors. When Timrollpickering deleted the redirect at Google X, they also deleted the history of the Google X page, which contained the names of the authors of the merged content. This means that at the moment, the merged content about the discontinued 2005 Google X project at List of Google products is technically a copyright violation.


 * I think the easiest solution is to undelete the former page as a redirect at Google X (discontinued project) or Google X (project), so that the page history (and the attribution) is preserved. Mz7 (talk) 19:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * No opinion on this matter. Looking back the redirect was deleted on technical grounds to make way for a page move that attracted no opposition. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ahsan Ali Taj
Mohsin Ali Taj (talk) 00:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * @Matinbox: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * However, Matinbox. I have also deleted the entry for this topic you created in the article mainspace, after you made the above request. I deleted it under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion as it was blatantly promotional – something that the undeleted draft also suffers from. Please remove all the puffery, peacock language, statements of opinion about his virtue and so on, and include only facts that reliable sources can back up (without copying their words).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Aimée Cornwell
''I, Julesgreg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' I was only just notified today that it was considered for deletion and went back to it to edit it again. But it had gone. -Julesgreg (talk) 11:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Draft was deleted per G13 by an hour later. -- Finngall  talk  03:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware of this discussion and the speedy tag wasn't removed when the article was restored. I've restored it and removed the tag. Mackensen (talk) 04:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that - I should be able to do these restorations correctly in my sleep by now, but perhaps I was just doing it in my sleep... JohnCD (talk) 08:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

John Melmer
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -192.152.249.253 (talk) 13:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC) I am asking that this particular page be accepted into Wikipedia. Thanks for your consideration.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/John Melmer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 13:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr Mohd Fouzuddin
''I, Shaandon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Shaandon (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 13:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. (For The Dr Mohd Fouzuddin attempt) Hasteur (talk) 13:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:European Language Equality Network (2)
''I, Branwalather99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Branwalather99 (talk) 12:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia..
 * Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, called Notability, looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", i.e. not just press releases or the project's own material. The test is whether people not connected with it have found it sufficiently interesting or important to write substantial content about it. JohnCD (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

User talk:59.101.115.147
Criteria for deletion no longer applies. We would like to see the contents. Please restore. -103.6.159.87 (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Paging as the deleting admin to help shed light on the issue.  Unless something else has happened, "OldIPTalkPage" is still valid and therefore you need to provide more information 103IP. Hasteur (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * There was nothing useful or interesting there, only a single level-1 vandalism warning from April 2007. JohnCD (talk) 21:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Who's we? --MZMcBride (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Hunt Monitor
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zinfandelorganic (talk • contribs) 07:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ This is not the place to post the text of your article. It was deleted because its original author was identified as one of a group of paid editors/scammers creating, and pretending to be able to protect, articles for money. You should consult the deleting administrator, . JohnCD (talk) 08:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note that the original page is still at Draft:Hunt Monitors. You are welcome to add your improvements to that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Ogik Francis Peter
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ogik Francis Peter (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator . Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a resume hosting service; I will note that you have been warned for repeatedly posting it here. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 16:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

uranipuram
This article is about an uranipuram village and it will help the people to know about the village -Anish hs (talk) 10:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * To clarify, you're asking for the U5-speedied revisions to be restored? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 16:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buymore Limited
''I, Smartjon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Smartjon (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

It was declined and later deleted since it lacked citation and references, back then. I am happy to announce now there are multiple notable sources on the subject and hence I request permission to be allowed to proceed to edit and resubmit for clearance -Smartjon (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Smartjon, this is a technical X mark.svg Not done since the article contained content that was fairly promotional in tone, although I am willing to e-mail you a copy of the article. You'd have to take these portions out in order to make it neutral. An example is the phrase "Buymore is at the heart of the social media users and thus it strives to maintain a rapport and communicate events as they unfold directly to its customers via its twitter (@BuymoreCard) and Facebook (BuymoreKenya) platforms." Also, are you involved with the company in any form or fashion? I ask this because normally articles that sound promotional like this are promotional because they're written by someone involved with marketing, the article topic, or were otherwise asked/paid to create the article. You can still edit if this is the case, but you will need to disclose this COI on your userpage by stating that you are a paid editor (or whatever the COI is) and (if you are making non-paid edits along with paid edits) the titles of the articles you were asked to create. You can read more about this at WP:COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Another note: try to only include one official website in the external links section. You had nine links, which comes across as WP:ELSPAM. Typically you should only have the primary official website in the EL section since the official website should have links to their social media accounts - Wikipedia should not be used as a hub for these sites, nor should it contain the social media links for people involved with the company. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Barwal Rajput
''I, 2.223.168.64, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2.223.168.64 (talk) 21:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Advances in Group Theory and Applications
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Francesco de Giovanni (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

"Advances in Group Theory and Applications" is a new journal, but its editorial board, which is listed in the journal web page is formed by 13 very well-known mathematicians from several different countries, considered as the best world expert on the field. Their quality can for instance be checked either using the MathSciNet data base of the American Mathematical Society or the Mathematics Genealogy Project. It is reasonable that in the next few years the journal will have a prominent role in the mathematical world. The theory of groups is one of the most relevant topic of algebra (its foundation being due to Evariste Galois in 1831) Thanks for your consideration,  Francesco de Giovanni (2006 Honorary degree as Doctor of Science from the National University of Ireland)
 * X mark.svg Not done This article is currently up for deletion at Articles for deletion/Advances in Group Theory and Applications, so it does not fall under REFUND criteria. If it is deleted then you will have to petition the deleting administrator for the article's return and if they decline, go through WP:REFUND. However that said, right now the best time to try to save the article is in the here and now, so you need to argue for inclusion at the AfD discussion. I'll warn you: it's extremely difficult to argue for inclusion for journals since most times new journals will not gain coverage in RS nor will they tend to be included in notable indexing services unless they're through an extremely reputable organization or company. (IE, places that likely already have notability themselves and are already well established.) I note that this is an open access journal, which usually makes it even more difficult to establish notability, especially if it's newly founded. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Chieftec
This article was PRODed with my alternative account when I was still a WP:Newbie and did not understand notability guidelines. The topic passes WP:GNG. - sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 03:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Axial Flow Combines
''I, Jamesbushell.au, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jamesbushell.au (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

TOM EARLEY
''I, 86.153.147.6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 86.153.147.6 (talk) 06:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

International Project Management Association
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Qianbang (talk) 10:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

we updated IPMA´s Wikipedia presence and some guys (?) from North-America want to delete the site.

IPMA is an international professional Association with more than 60 contries Memeber associations. All us need to keep this and we will edit it often
 * X mark.svg Not done Qianbang, This is currently at AfD at Articles for deletion/International Project Management Association. If this is deleted at AfD this will not be something that could be restored through REFUND. Also, you will need to show that the organization is notable by showing where it has received coverage in independent and reliable sources such as news articles or similar. Just existing as an organization, even an international one, is not something that would show notability in and of itself. Also, please be aware that anyone can edit Wikipedia and while your comments do not explicitly show that you are trying to exert WP:OWNERSHIP of the page, it does somewhat give off that impression. In general Wikipedia discourages people from editing articles that they have a direct conflict of interest with, as it's very, very easy for people to make promotional sounding edits or take deletion or changes a bit too personally. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Team Secret
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Edwin Hale (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

I am a technological cretin and not very competent at constructing new pages. Nonetheless, I have contributed over many years, both whole articles and regular corrections.

I do not play computer games but my attention was drawn to a particularly successful team led by Clement "Puppey" Ivanov which has succeeded in winning over $1.5 million in prize money over the past 18 months. I believe that wikipedia needs to show references to such teams as to any teams or competitors in major sports, written in laymen's terms.

I realise that my original entry was short of references but give me time! I am a busy man and the entry was deleted too soon for me to draw in the necessary additional information and references, some, but not all of which can be found on other wikis.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It was deleted as A7, so it can't be restored here, but if Mojo Hand has no objection then this could probably be moved to AfC or to the userspace for you to work on. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I feel I should note that E-sports generally do not appear to be covered by WP:Notability (sports), meaning that you absolutely must have multiple third-party reliable sources that discuss Team Secret in depth before an article's even considered. See WP:Notability, WP:Notability (organizations and companies) (which sports teams fall under, as opposed to the sports notability criteria), and WP:Identifying reliable sources. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 16:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Medisaid/"The fifth dimension equation"
''I, Medisaid, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' I would like to undelete my article because I want to take some lost informations from it. Also, after two times my articles was delete, i would appreciate if you can tell me precisely whats wrong about it. I dont want to make advertising, i juste want to put my work in a link. Tell me how to do it please. Dear regards. -Medisaid (talk) 16:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request, so you can recover information from it; but I am afraid that there is no chance this will be accepted for the encyclopedia. The reason is that it is your own original work, but Wikipedia is not a place to publish original work. Please read No original research, which includes:

"'If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery. '"
 * JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Bwin.svg
I am restoring the Bwin article as an article on the historical company. The logo is necessary for the infobox. -Cloudbound (talk) 18:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. Please add it to the article a.s.a.p. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, already done. Cloudbound (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

File:QualiTest Logo.jpg
Please undelete. Thanks. - Wil ly  Wea zley  14:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅, restored and tagged. Please double-check my tagging. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Stephen Watson Speaking at a BMW Event in 2012.jpg
Please undlete. OTRS received. - Wil ly  Wea zley  14:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅, restored and tagged. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nasher%27s_Stool_At_The_Bell_Inn&action=edit&redlink=1
151.229.171.147 (talk) 16:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 16:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have moved it to Draft:Nasher's Stool At The Bell Inn. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Indian Railways E-Procurment Systems (IREPS)
I wanted to review and will make changes as per its existing condition. I am working for IREPS and wanted its presence online and wiki is the best place people look after, it a very popular website in Indian Railways -223.176.239.88 (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * We have zero tolerance for being used for SEO/advertising. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 16:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Nevertheless, WP:AFC is the appropriate venue for an editor with a conflict of interest to submit an article. That said, I'd feel better about restoring it if the request came from a registered user account that clearly disclosed its paid-editing affiliation. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I intend it more as a warning not to view Wikipedia as a place to advertise, given what the requestor said indicates he only cares about Wikipedia because of its Alexa ranking. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. moved to Draft:Indian Railways E-Procurment Systems (IREPS) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mary Bettwy
''I, 68.8.121.146, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 68.8.121.146 (talk) 00:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I am still in the process of retrieving additional primary sources to establish that Mary Bettwy was a well-known public figure in Arizona; females were not as well documented at the time -68.8.121.146 (talk) 00:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example
1.187.128.52 (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You are going to have to tell us what page you want to have restored, as your IP has not edited anything before. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Forum on Information Standards in Heritage
''I, 31.222.211.51, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 31.222.211.51 (talk) 10:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Forum on Information Standards in Heritage Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atreides_(album)
The administration deleted it hastily in less than 24hrs of the notice so I was not able to challenge it. After reviewing the case, he/she asked me to request this undeletion. -Discog79 (talk) 10:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

trifid(Research)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rajnishtrifid (talk) 15:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your company. JohnCD (talk) 15:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

chandra jyoti chakma
I don't know how to delated my artcle - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandra jyoti chakma (talk • contribs) 17:01, 7 September 2015
 * ❌. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself. Please read Guidance for younger editors. JohnCD (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

KONI Group
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Regushee (talk) 21:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Also pinging  and  who also felt the same way. Hasteur (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I think creator now created redirect for it, I think that is ok now. Previous article was written in promotional manner. I hope will add some sources in target article. -- Human 3015   TALK    22:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ...if allowed time to do so...(Regushee (talk) 22:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC))

Don't take it in bad faith, we are not against you or against any new editors, we encourage new editors. You can use WP:Sandbox to prepare your matter with sources. You can see option "Sandbox" on right upper side in between "talk" and "Preferences". -- Human 3015   TALK   22:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)  he is not new-- Human 3015   TALK    22:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Aquarian Family Festival
important Subject : fraud & politics
 * http://www.metroactive.com/metro/05.20.09/music-0920.html
 * http://rockprosopography101.blogspot.com/2009/09/san-jose-ca-outdoor-rock-festivals-1967.html
 * http://www.coog.com/family1.html
 * http://web.hypersurf.com/~charlieb/3daybein.htm
 * Northern California Folk-Rock Festival (1969)
 * Northern California Folk-Rock Festival (1968) -Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 04:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Aquarian Family Festival, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

File:Nithya Menen Malli malli idi rani roju making.jpeg
Please undelete then move to commons. - Wil ly  Wea zley  14:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * See my note on the OTRS ticket. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * for now. The OTRS ticket shows no evidence that the sender is the copyright holder. At this point it's basically an anonymous email, untraceable to the company Creative Commercials it purports to represent. Feel free to make another request when such evidence is given. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Military Cyber Professionals Association
''I, Uconngijoe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Uconngijoe (talk) 06:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

File:AstroCourthouseFacilityDog.jpg
Boilerplate release. Please restore with if plausible (no reason for me to suspect otherwise). Thanks! -Storkk (talk) 13:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please add OTRS template and ticket number. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Done, thanks, Graeme! (And apologies: I should have linked to ticket:2015072810025103 for future reference). Storkk (talk) 07:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Starkillers
The article seems to have been deleted based on merely a few comments and questioning of source. There's ample evidence of any info that was on the article. The original editors of the article (who I am unaware of) may have gotten a few spellings wrong. This can be easily fixed. No reason to delete an entire article. Its Starkillers true life journey through music. He has had 12 no. 1 beatport records and has been a producer/dj in the music industry for over 15 years. This article was deleted based on not enough credibility to be on Wikipedia? Please rethink this. Its someone's life and career story. If needed, any piece of info in question on the article can be verified by any individuals mentioned directly in the article or any further info required to ensure the info is 100% true. This is unfair to delete a world Renowned artist's life story based on apparently un-sited 1 or 2 pieces of info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brawlarecords (talk • contribs) 05:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Starkillers, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Brawlarecords, what the article needs to be recreated is coverage in independent and reliable sources. Also, your username will need to be changed since it's the same as the record label. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Tokyogirl79 thank you for your feedback! how do I go about changing the name to my personal name? its kiranchandani Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brawlarecords (talk • contribs) 06:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * apply at WP:Changing username. JohnCD (talk) 08:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

File:LubovGazov.jpeg
Pursuant to ticket:2015071010005177 please undelete File:LubovGazov.jpeg with and. It is not crystal clear that this is the file in question, but hopefully we can clear this up soon. Thanks, Storkk (talk) 07:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please fix up the OTRS template if it is the correct image, otherwise, ask for deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lemondo Entertainment
''I, Levandoc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Levandoc (talk) 10:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Lemondo Entertainment. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)