Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 208

PanTerra Networks
Disagree that PanTerra Networks is a non-notable company as it has received numerous awards in it's sector and has been featured in numerous articles along side it's competitors. A cursory internet search would reveal this. If PanTerra Networks is deemed non-notable so should it's competitors, such as Ring Central, 8x8, etc that also have pages which have not been proposed for deletion. It seems likely that this deletion was proposed by someone closely related to a competitor of PanTerra Networks. -Nsbendel (talk) 23:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done While this was a PROD and we normally restore those upon request, the article is very promotional in tone and would need a re-write to remove the WP:WEASEL words and WP:PUFFERY. I have no problem e-mailing a copy of this out to you, Nsbendel, but this will require you to enable your e-mail. However I would like to ask that you assume WP:GOODFAITH here. (Also be careful, as accusations of bad faith and WP:COI can cause others to ask if you have a COI.) It's very unlikely that this was done by a rival of PanTerra Networks as the editor who PRODed the article has been here since 2006 and I don't see anything in their edit history that would immediately suggest a conflict of interest. I also need to caution you that the existence of other articles on Wikipedia does not guarantee that every company passes notability guidelines. (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) It may be that the other companies fail notability guidelines and haven't been deleted yet. As far as industry awards go, be cautious of these since the majority of industry awards for any given company will not count towards notability on Wikipedia. The amount of awards considered to be notability giving (regardless of what they're for) are actually pretty few in number and I like to say that Wikipedia considers less than 5% of any award ever given to be notable ones. One of the best ways to show notability for an award would be to show where the award is covered in independent and reliable sources like newspaper articles and the like. (You will need to have these in general for the article to show it passes WP:CORP.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Understood. I've enabled email. Can you please email me the content and I'll see what I can do about rewriting it to sound less promotional and include source to satisfy notability requirements. Thank you Nsbendel (talk) 17:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Here and Beyond Multi-Media Mirrored Installation.jpg
We received a valid permission, see 2015091610022812. -Jcb (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please add valid OTRS received template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:IGCSE American History-Corinth, MS Coursework Help
''I, Mdlou99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mdlou99 (talk) 18:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" This is clearly not an article, but Wikiversity may welcome this page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Bell_Gardens_Pasadena_2014.jpg
Valid OTRS permission received, see 2015092210003251. -Jcb (talk) 15:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done  Please add valid OTRS ticket received template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Kathryn Barger
Page was deleted because of a lack of sources when in fact there were four sources -Andersc11 (talk) 21:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ That was not the reason it was deleted. It was deleted because it was an advertisement promoting the person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Isaac Shepard
''I, Swhog1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Swhog1 (talk) 17:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I'd like to improve this abondoned article to a point where I can resubmit it. -Swhog1 (talk) 18:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Solium Capital
Would like to complete this page. -66.244.233.36 (talk) 16:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Lukup
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -122.166.15.95 (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Kuru,

Would request you to suggest which link of wiki be exactly the correct spot to publish a brief about the organization. Thanks in advance!

Regards Neeva
 * X mark.svg Not done This isn't really a request to restore as much as it's a question about where to post material that was deleted at Lukup. In answer to that question, if you are unblocked the proper place to try to create an article for the organization would be at WP:AfC. I'll post more on your talk page. I've removed the block template as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Shoaib Subhani
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Shoaib Subhani (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Shoaib Subhani, the articles were deleted because you did not assert how the person (presumably yourself) was notable. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a social media site and all biographies must assert how the person is notable per WP:GNG. That you tried to create this at multiple different locations (Shoaib Khalid Subhani, Shoaib subhani, Shoaib Subhani) isn't helpful, as this can be seen as disruptive. Please do not re-add this information to the mainspace. You can add some information to your userpage, but it should only contain information about yourself as it pertains to your editing on Wikipedia. In the meantime I would recommend that you visit WP:TEAHOUSE and go through one of the training programs (WP:ADVENTURE, WP:TRAINING) for a good overview of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Arnold Fruchtenbaum
Deleted via PROD in 2011. Strong Google Scholar results indicate notability, as does this 2013 article. -StAnselm (talk) 09:21, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It needs better references. JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julio Bermejo
''I, 75.101.62.6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 75.101.62.6 (talk) 16:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ There is no point, as there is no content, and you would be better off starting again at WP:AFC using the newer templates. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Elizabeth Stewart White
Research purposes. -2601:241:8402:71F4:9D8D:4869:FD21:313 (talk) 01:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ Such a page did not exist. Are you sure you have the correct name? Elizabeth White page has no mention either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I can't find anything at the speedy deletion wiki either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

User:EllisTraub/Rational Value
''I, EllisTraub, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' EllisTraub (talk) 04:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

The reason for deletion of the submitted article concerning Rational Value was that there was no recognition or authority for use of the term beyond my having coined it and including it and its explanation in my book, "Take Stock: A Roadmap to Profiting from your First Walk down Wall Street (First published by Kaplan and now in its third printing, as well as having been published in Japan).

There is now acknowledgement and acceptance by the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) who have just published an article I have written in their October edition of their publication, the AAII Journal. You will find a pdf file of their website and page offering this article as well as a copy of this article in a .pdf file you may access here.

I respectfully request that the article that was deleted be reconsidered for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention to this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EllisTraub (talk • contribs) 04:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * EllisTraub, the userspace article has been restored. If you want this term to be considered for mainspace acceptance then you will need to resubmit this to AfC. However I do need to point out that someone publishing your work does not make the concept notable. What you need here are reliable sources that talk about the topic. Anything that you personally publish will be considered a primary source regardless of how much is published or where. I also have to caution you that Wikipedia is not a place to promote, popularize, or otherwise raise awareness for your work. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:27, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

clemens nathan research centre
would like to access original content and revise systematically to meet criteria and deal with original objections -Ajbucket (talk) 07:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done Article was PROD. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Clemens Nathan Research Centre. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File:IndoreMontage.png
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mr.vivek0305 (talk) 07:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Technically X mark.svg Not done, since it was never deleted and the nomination was withdrawn. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Udiya Baba
''I, Rasucha, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rasucha (talk) 12:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

User:Dr.Dachowski/sandbox/Dr. Michael T. Dachowski D.M.D.
I would like to retrieve the page that was deleted. I don't know why it was deleted, I provided the right tags and references when creating the page. I also sent out an email to you guys stating that I am allowed to create content for Dr. Dachowski. I would like to be able to retrieve the deleted page so I can make the requirements for a published page. -Dr.Dachowski (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.  Furthermore your response here suggests either that you are editing in a role account or that you are recieving payment for creating this page  both of which are prohibited by established policy. Hasteur (talk) 19:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

InGiustizia La Parola al Popolo
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Amedeo Leone (talk) 19:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC) Free Press Around Italy, no party, no colour, no needs.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Draft:InGiustizia restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:48, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram.jpg
We received an OTRS permission, see 2015092310022568. -Jcb (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please add OTRS received. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Fantasy Dimension
We received permission, see 2015100410003961, please have a look if the article is suitable to be restored. -Jcb (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please add OTRS received to talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Kyle Finnegan
''I, Joeschmoe1991, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Joeschmoe1991 (talk) 04:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✔️ The page is at User:Joeschmoe1991/Kyle Finnegan. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:51, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

InGiustizia La Parola al Popolo - Request for Undeletion
InGiustizia La Parola al Popolo is an independent monthly e-bulletin adherent to Italian National Association of Forensic Press, founded in 1975 by the Attorney Romolo Reboa.

The magazine was born from an editorial idea by Att. RomoloReboa, who, together with a group of colleagues and friends: Att.Francesco Rocca, journalist and deputy editor in chief of the online coordination of Rainews and professor of multimedia journalism at Rome's University Lumsa; Dr.Fausto Pellegrini; Att. and trade Unionist Peter Masetti engaged for years in social work as a trade union's leader and spokesman for the discomfort of the weakest of Italian society and Dr. Alberto Passibli decided to create the e-bulletin as a way of informing jurists at the Italian courts.

The title itself, La Parola al Popolo (i.e The Word to The People) summarizes an intellectual and generational compromise between different kinds of spirits, changing the way Italians intends social policy.

Quoting the famous Italian singer Rino Gaetano, this idea is summed up in a verse of one of his most world-famous songs, "Who lives in the cabin, who run after wages / lovers love, the firer to target those who eat once, who wants to increase / who changes the boat happy and contented but the sky is always bluer "(Rino Gaetano - 1975's song which has been contemporaneous with the birth of the magazine).

The focus of the magazine has then been directed over the years to issues of rights and liberties as well as justice and home affairs in Italy and abroad; institutional issues and the operational phases of the PA (i.e. Public Administration), the evolution of law and issues related to the core activities of law firms.

InGiustizia La Parola al Popolo is not directly linked to any political ideology and / or party. It has an independent character aimed at informing forensic Italian class with particular attention to social and economic issues in the various phases of the litigation process. It is an integral part of Services' Company InGiustizia Servizi Ltd and aims to analyze with the scientific rigor of the lawyer, issues of law and freedom. The scientific approach and the logical rigor forms the basis of the magazine.

Main objectives of InGiustizia La Parola al Popolo are: to inform and to educate Italian jurists by acting as a platform of communication between the various realities which exist in the Italian legal landscape, following through its journalistic activities the key principles of advocacy, namely, transparency and fairness of professional relationship.

InGiustizia La Parola al Popolo, acts as an exchanging forum of dialogue between the lawyers, the citizens and involved institutions.

Numerous workshops and seminars throughout the year in partnership with the Italian Consumers' Association Insieme Consumatori, acting as a guarantor of the interests for citizens and consumers ==
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:InGiustizia La Parola al Popolo Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:51, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:French 75 (band)
''I, 205.219.237.245, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 205.219.237.245 (talk) 05:36, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Kyle Edward Finnegan
''I, 75.108.211.71, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 75.108.211.71 (talk) 04:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:56, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Kyle Edward Finnegan
''I, Joeschmoe1991, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Joeschmoe1991 (talk) 04:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✔️ There is no need to ask more than once. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:57, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Madonna The First Album international.jpg
The image was used in Madonna (Madonna album). It was replaced by sockpuppet's PNG version. -George Ho (talk) 00:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * In this case the images are slightly different with a different colour cast, different position of text and different hair disappearance. Yours has a scratch and some other degradation artifacts.  So before restoring I need to see more evidence of what is the genuine cover. Your version came from here http://eil.com/shop/moreinfo.asp?catalogid=240349 which says "1983 German issue" but I don't see why that web site is authoritative on the image. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Here is proof: . Need more? --George Ho (talk) 08:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * That one confirms the .png is more accurate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:32, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * And another: . --George Ho (talk) 13:50, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Football at the 2007 & the 2011 Military World Games
It's an official men's football competition organized by the International Military Sports Council (CISM). It's a part of the Military World Games and also of the World Military Cup -Fayçal.09 (talk) 19:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

It's an official football competition organized by the International Military Sports Council (CISM). It's a part of the Military World Games and also of the World Military Cup -Fayçal.09 (talk) 19:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Same reasons -Fayçal.09 (talk) 19:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Nothing to do here as its not deleted. It was redirected and you can see old content at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Football_at_the_2007_Military_World_Games_%E2%80%93_Men%27s_tournament&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Football+at+the+2011+Military+World+Games&action=history and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Football+at+the+2011+Military+World+Games+%E2%80%93+Men%27s+tournament&action=history
 * But also see Articles for deletion/Football at the 2011 Military World Games which voted to merge similar articles. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Right it was redirected after a vote but followed on others pages mentionned here. Because this I make a request to ask administrators to restaure (redirect) these pages. Regards. --Fayçal.09 (talk) 10:33, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you think these individual events have notability in themselves and the AFD was wrong then be bold and do it yourself. But in this case don't expect an administrator blessing to actually reverse an AFD outcome for you. It will be best ot have new information for the pages to stop them being turned to redirects again.  You could also propose it on the talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank u for your explanation, if I can (have permission) to redirect, that's allright. Just I prefere warring admin, I think it's more better then to do by myself any contribution that maybe can be not legal in Wikipedia. But sure not to have an administrator blessing to act what I can do. Best regards. --Fayçal.09 (talk) 12:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I redirected the the two pages Football at the 2007 Military World Games – Men's tournament & Football at the 2011 Military World Games – Men's tournament and I contacted the admin redirecter of the Football at the 2011 Military World Games page (here). Results that they had redirected again the two first pages and no solution about the third page. --Fayçal.09 (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

There is consensus at a previous AfD to redirect articles similar to this to the parent page. JMHamo (talk) 20:24, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Sand Snowman
''I, Will Blighter, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Will Blighter (talk) 10:11, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

My email(s) had been hacked and I only just recieved notification of my article's deletion. Going by the reason's given for my articles rejection, I imagine that I need to simply clarify my sources in order to provide evidence of noteworthiness. Thanks in advance for your patience
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Work Scaffolding Sculpture by Ben Long at 30 St Mary Axe, London, 2014.jpg
We received permission at OTRS, see 2015100910011906. -Jcb (talk) 11:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please add otrs received template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

VINOD KUMAR RAMKUMAR
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -VINOD KUMAR RAMKUMAR (talk) 13:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC) SORRY I THINK YOU HAVE MISTAKEN ME SIR .I DON'T WEBHOST HERE SO PLEASE DONT REMOVE MY PAGE
 * ❌ This is an encyclopedia here, not a place for a personal page. You should be writing an encyclopedia article if you wish to contribute. You can use linkedin or facebook for this sort of writing about yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Atlas Wealth Management
''I, Bravoecho22, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bravoecho22 (talk) 23:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Mariahcareysingle ctta.jpg
A sockpuppet replaced the JPEG version with PNG one in Can't Take That Away (Mariah's Theme). -George Ho (talk) 00:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅, image restored, sock-uploaded one deleted per WP:CSD, and original image restored in the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rococo_Chocolates
''I, 90.215.10.241, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 90.215.10.241 (talk) 07:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Rococo Chocolates Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:32, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Easy Lover Phil Collins and Philip Bailey seven-inch.jpg
Some sockpuppet replaced one image with another in the file page. I need previous image/revision restored. -George Ho (talk) 08:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * There is nothing visible in deleted history of that page. It looks like changed the visibility of one revision deleted revision (which is why it doesn't appear), but in my view that one doesn't follow the subject of the page title. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:50, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * , in reply to your message on my talk page I'm like and that the edit was made by someone subsequently blocked as a sock, I'm not seeing the damage done to the image or the article by using the version that currently exists. Nthep (talk) 10:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It is a back cover of 12-inch US release. George Ho (talk) 10:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, on the sole basis that the image didn't match the source or the NFUR I've reinstated the previous version. Nthep (talk) 11:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Nikolaos Xexakis
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Clive sweeting (talk) 15:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC) I do not believe the discussion was correctly handled due to an erroneous name; I find the advised procedure too complicated and do not know the name of the deleting administrator. I request that the article be relisted12 October2015Clive Sweeting
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Nikolaos Xenakis, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Davis-Lenox House
''I, 2601:42:703:74D3:E45D:C735:829C:927F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2601:42:703:74D3:E45D:C735:829C:927F (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I cannot see where this is copied from (if so), but if any text is copied from elsewhere it must be rewritten, or the other place must release it under a cc-by-sa-3.0 license. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Simon Jersey
The page was under review, I was asked to provide further references and state my case, and that this would take place over 7 days. I did, nobody responded, I received no notifications, and then the page was deleted. Completely unreasonable and rude to request this from me if there was no intention to even review or discuss. -Dcanders88 (talk) 11:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This was discussed at Articles for deletion/Simon Jersey. This page suggests two possibilities for you, restore as a draft, draft:Simon Jersey or as a userspace draft at User:Dcanders88/Simon Jersey.  Of which of these options are you wish to avail yourself? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you Graeme, could you please restore as a draft? Is there then the possibility of submitting it for 'live' once I feel it completely meets Wkipedia's guidelines? User:Dcanders88/Simon Jersey 08:11, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * , I'd probably recommend asking Sandstein before moving it to the mainspace, just because that would help ensure that it didn't get deleted as a recreation and that the sources did show notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Mishal Kanoo
This article was already contested for undeletion and was primarily restored. More citations were added to the content to support the veracity of the details, but again deleted. We don't see any advertising as according to your claims. Everything stated were purely facts. Mishal's involvement in some organizations mentioned were merely coincidental and not intended for advertising purposes -86.98.86.230 (talk) 05:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done There were some promotional statements in the article such as this one:
 * "His wide-ranging knowledge of regional business affairs and global capital markets give him unique and often controversial insight into business life in the Gulf region."
 * This is very promotional in tone and there are several more statements in the article. You'd need to really go over this with a fine toothed comb in order to remove all of the WP:PUFFERY. RHaworth may be willing to e-mail a copy to the account e-mail for Mishal Kanoo if it was enabled and you promised to work on this at WP:AfC rather than in the mainspace. I would also encourage that you go through WP:TRAINING or WP:ADVENTURE and absolutely utilize WP:TEAHOUSE during this, since I get the strong impression of a WP:COI here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Kindly restore the page and remove only the phrases that you have mentioned, instead of removing the entire page. We will work on this progressively. Deleting the entire page requires us to start from scratch over and over again which is completely a down time.
 * The problem with this is that it's not as simple as removing just the phrases listed here - the promotional content is very heavily mixed into the article as a whole and removing it would require that I re-write it as a whole. I'm willing to help, but I'd prefer that you do the re-writing to start with, as this would help you learn the processes of writing. I'd also recommend that you go through WP:AfC if/when you do submit a new version. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File:CTTA Mariah.jpg
This image was replaced by the current image. However, I found out that the current image is of a promo CD. I don't know what this image was, but I hope it's the same as this commercial CD. -George Ho (talk) 02:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * George Ho, it's largely the same image but with the name of the single on the side rather than on the bottom. The current image is of better quality, but doesn't have the side bar with the single information. I can restore it, but the quality of it is pretty poor and everything has this huge pink tinge to it, like Mariah was a muppet or something. This is probably why someone tried to replace it. I'd probably recommend just uploading a new cover image, but I can restore it if you want to take a look. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:25, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Go ahead, but I'll upload a better quality image soon as a newest revision. The current image used in infobox is truly a promo image, not commercial. --George Ho (talk) 03:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done I noticed that it had previously been up for MfD by Explicit, but for some reason I thought this had been speedied. I'd already restored it, so you'll need to post a new image soon. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately the new image isn't entirely accurate (the one made to replace this) so something new would have to be added anyway. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * My bad; I thought words are within the picture, not sidebarred. Also, it was uploaded by the same person who uploaded the image Just re-delete. I apologize for wasting space on this. --George Ho (talk) 04:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Nah, don't apologize. It's always good to confirm something like this whenever possible. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

colter johnson
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jimino Wallace (talk) 18:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC) subject is notable and obviously worthy of mention.
 * ❌ Article on Colter Johnson has not been deleted, just proposed for deletion.  Address the grounds for deletion proposed of you want the article to remain. Nthep (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NCP engineering, Inc.
''I, 79.208.0.205, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 79.208.0.205 (talk) 12:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:NCP engineering, Inc.. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Geraldine F. "Geri" Thompson.jpg
Restore version of October 18, 2010, per keeplocal and recent discussion (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Geraldine_F._%22Geri%22_Thompson.jpg ). -Elvey(t•c) 08:51, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ But it will also be good to have a reason for that keeplocal. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:12, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Jennifer Teege - My Grandfather (2015).jpg
The file was deleted via CSD under F7 on the assumption that the article Jennifer Teege was about the author, not about the book pictured. Meanwhile, the article in which the book cover was used has since been renamed as a book article; therefore, the upload remains consistent with Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. It is meant to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article My Grandfather Would Have Shot Me dedicated entirely to the work in question. Thanks, - Poeticbent  talk 14:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The image isn't deleted. Nor is the article.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  20:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅. Please add it to the article and amend the fair-use rationale a.s.a.p. Pinging the deleting admin to apologise: as this was an FFD deletion I should have referred it back to you, but I didn't see that till after I had restored it. JohnCD (talk) 20:17, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I looked in the history to confirm that it had not been deleted but I guess I didn't look closely enough -- S Philbrick (Talk)  21:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * There is sometimes a too-many-cooks situation on this page, but at least we provide a fairly rapid response time! JohnCD (talk) 21:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank a lot. All is well,  Poeticbent  talk 22:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Mohsin
{{subst:refund|1= Baba Payam ud Din Reshi |2= Baba Payam uddin Reshi a world famous site, tourist place and a heritage site has been been put under deletion. please remove the notice.178.152.21.162 (talk) 05:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This is up for AfD at Articles for deletion/Baba Payam ud Din Reshi. The best place to contest this is at the AfD page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Miss Sunuwar
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dskoich (talk) 09:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done At the time of this request being made, the article had not been deleted. Also, the article was an almost identical re-creation of an article previously deleted as a result of 100% consensus at AfD. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Guru Nanak FC
Hi, I would request that the page I created for Guru Nanak FC (Football Club) could be restored. I am a senior maember of management within the club and was requested by the club chairman to create the Wikipedia page to broaden our online pressence, due to Wikipedia's huge repuation and brand. We are the largest multi cultural club in the UK and have a huge following, both in person and online. All of the information used on the created page was taken and can be verified from www.gurunanakfc.co.uk. We are currently members of the Kent County League, which has it's own wikipedia page, as do many of the member clubs. I would be very grateful if you could re-instate the page/article. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samyoung100 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌. Wikipedia is not here to help clubs to broaden their on-line presence. The inclusion criterion is called Notability and looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The test is, have people independent of the club thought it important or significant enough to write substantial content about?


 * Also, as a member of the club you have a Conflict of interest and should not write about it directly; see also the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.


 * If you can find references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, you can ask user, the deleting administrator, whether he is willing to restore the article into a draft page where you can work on it, before submitting it to an uninvolved user for review. JohnCD (talk) 20:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm very willing to restore it to a draft page, but I note the clear conflict of interest, which is already reported means you should not be editing it. If you are not going to edit it who will? I don't want to waste your time. If the article is restored to a draft page and only you work on it, it is unlikely to ever be accepted.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  20:06, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * my reading of WP:PSCOI #6 is that it's OK for the club's representative to edit a draft, provided it is submitted to independent review through AfC and not moved directly to mainspace. If it is actually notable there is no reason why an article might not be achieved; my concern is that they should not waste their time by failing to understand what we require for noatbilty. JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair point. If a COI editor writes a draft that meets notability requirements, I suppose it can be moved into mainspace. I'm thinking that they aren't supposed to be editing the article itself but I guess the distinction is that it is reviewed by an independent editor before moving into mainspace and thereafter they should not continue to edit it. However, I am mildly worried that an article almost totally written by a COI editor might be difficult to get through AFC — I confess they do not do any reviewing at AFC so perhaps it will get accepted eventually. I just don't want to leave the impression that if a COI editor is the sole editor of an article that there will be no issues getting it into mainspace. I'm just trying to manage expectations. If they meet the notability requirements it ought to make it in, but I don't want to leave the impression that if they work on it in draft space it'll inevitably get in.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  21:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

I have no further interest in updating the page, I simply created it with the relevant factual information. Anybody should now be able to edit the page. Please enlighten me further as to what you require for notability? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samyoung100 (talk • contribs) 12:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Sharjah institute for heritage
the article worth publishing, its for a cultural governmental institute -86.97.222.248 (talk) 14:37, 14 October 2015 (UTC) :
 * X mark.svg Not done This page is for requesting the restoration of pages which have previously existed, and been deleted, but there has never existed a page called Sharjah institute for heritage. You may like to go to Requested articles to request that the article be created, but I think it only fair to warn you that in my experience very few requested articles get created. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Sharjah institute for heritage
the article worth publishing, its for a cultural governmental instituteSuhad Sawalha (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC) -Suhad Sawalha (talk) 14:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done There has never been an article Sharjah institute for heritage: you evidently mean Sharjah Institute for Heritage. That article was an unambiguous attempt to use Wikipedia for promotion of an organisation, and is not suitable as an article. If an uninvolved, neutral editor thinks that the subject is worthy of an article, then he or she can create one, written from a neutral point of view. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Alva
''I, TBSheets, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' TBSheets (talk) 16:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:59, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

The Bombay Greenway Project
We received a permission, 2015092410011051, see Talk:The Bombay Greenway Project. Please see if the content is suitable to be restored. -Jcb (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done the content is promotional, explaining the advantages of the project, and does not contain information suitable for an encyclopedia. It would need a total rewrite. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

The content is not promotional, it is a about creating awareness for a public space that could affect millions of lives in the cit of Mumbai. There have been projects with similar content posted - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyCycle_(proposed_transport_project) I am willing to reword the article if you would give us chance. Please find below external references to the project: http://velo-city2013.com/?page_id=2337&project_id=207 http://grihaindia.org/grihasummit/presentations/Abraham-john-Bombay-Greenway-Project.pdf http://cyclists.in/forum/topics/the-bombay-greenway-project-walk-cycle-play-unwind-on-the https://www.tfod.in/art-design-articles/1836/the-bombay-greenway-project-urban-renewal-proposal-for-mumbai-by-abraham-john-architects http://geospatial.blogs.com/geospatial/2014/02/innovative-proposal-for-a-linear-park-in-mumbai.html http://geospatialworld.net/Magazine/MArticleView.aspx?aid=31010 http://www.constructionopportunities.in/IssueDetailPage?IssueMenuMasterId=28&ParentMenuId=24&ContentType=SubParent http://www.magnamags.com/society-interiors/features/abraham-john-architects-proposes-to-lay-a-new-green-carpet-for-mumbai-through-its-proposal-bombay/421 http://www.spicysangria.com/charity/bombay-greenway-project.html http://ebuild.in/the-bombay-greenway-project http://instantpublish.blogspot.in/2014/08/talk-on-bombay-greenway-project-gets.html

Neha S Gupta —Preceding undated comment added 04:45, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Neha S Gupta, using phrases like "most important" and listing out the potential virtues of a projet is seen as promotional on here. I also need to caution you that Wikipedia is not a place to raise awareness for a project, regardless of how much good it might bring about. (WP:NOTSOAPBOX) However you could approach Randykitty and ask him to e-mail you a copy of the article so you can re-write it, although I'd certainly recommend that you work through WP:AfC rather than in the mainspace, especially as there is likely a WP:COI here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Tokyogirl79. I would appreciate it if Randykitty would email me the article in order for me to rewrite it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neha S Gupta (talk • contribs) 03:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * What is the difference between "it is a about creating awareness for..." and "it is about promoting..."? I see none. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * then what about projects like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyCycle_(proposed_transport_project)?

SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings
Deletion log indicates Expired PROD, concern was: Fails to meet Notability standards. Based on reading the Wikipedia's Notability Standards, we believe we can rectify any concerns. -209.114.181.10 (talk) 20:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. see Society for Protective Coatings Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Renzo Tomellini
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -151.96.3.241 (talk) 08:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * 
 * The article has not been deleted; deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Renzo Tomellini, and that is where you should comment. First, read WP:DISCUSSAFD, WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people). These discussions normally last for a week. JohnCD (talk) 08:58, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Simpsons cast.png
300px looks too small for wide image. How about recovering one of previous revisions and then letting me request bot shrinking for this image to a size bigger than 300px (but still small). -George Ho (talk) 04:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done There is also a paler version, but I thought this one looked good. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Jessica Mae (Makeup Artist)
''I, Kozanno, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Kozanno (talk) 15:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

User:Lion1407/Eddie Vowell (Coach)
Lion1407 (talk) 17:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

User:Lion1407/Eddie Vowell (Coach)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

DRAFT: GREENVELOPE
CliffordChenLemon (talk) 21:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Greenvelope Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 15 October 2015 (UTC)