Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 210

Cierkosz
Is a surname from word tweet. It most populated in Poland. -Zyrafe (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. please provide references, Polish references are OK. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Danjuma Adamu
''I, Jblims, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jblims (talk) 00:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Danjuma Adamu. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

jwalantham
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -117.202.65.204 (talk) 03:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC) The Jwalantham is an upcoming Kannada movie scheduled to be released in November 2015.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Jwalantham, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
 * If you read the deletion discussion, you will see that RoySmith, the closing administrator, said he was willing to "userfy" the article - restore it to a page in user space where you could work on it until the film has received enough coverage to meet the requirements of WP:NFF. I suggest that you log in to your account (or register one if you do not have one) and leave a message on his talk page asking him to do that. JohnCD (talk) 14:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Manas Madrecha
This article is of a BLP, which, when published was in creation by User:AlwaysHappy by adding the increation tag, when it was deleted using Speedy Deletion by citing spam and insignificant. However, the person being dicussed abides by the notability guidelines of BLP, and had sufficient third-party references to prove the facts claims. It had more than 30 edits, edited by more than 5 distinct users/bots. The person is a public figure of Thane and Mulund cities (suburban areas of Mumbai, India). Relevant references were made while claiming his representation of notable college under Mumbai University. Moreover, the lead introduction was "Indian poet, writer and blogger". The article had over a dozen citations to validate itself and was patrolled too. I had put a stub tag, and some citation-needed tags for maintenance, which were rectified accordingly. So, in all, the article was notable and could have been improvised, and discussed on its talk page, before directly jumping for Speedy Deletion by a user who has been discredited in the past for hasty tags of Speedy Deletion. So, after futile debate with the administrator, I request here that the article be restored back, and instead of deletion, a maintenance tag be put on its top, upon restoration. -AlicePeston (talk) 12:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Endorse keeping. Yes, I agree with AlicePeston (talk). No reason exists to delete the article speedily. Maintenance tags could have been put. Even some sections of the article could have been deleted, but the entire article should'nt and needn't be deleted so hastily. The article could have been even proposed for deletion, and then discussion could have ensued. But, speedy deletion should definitely not be used. So, my opinion is to have the page back, and then improvements could be made on it.AlwaysHappy (talk) 12:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌. At the head of this page it says:
 * "'Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here. Requests for the undeletion of pages deleted under these criteria will not be accepted here... If you feel that an article deleted under any of these criteria was deleted in error, please contact the deleting administrator. If you discuss, but are unable to resolve the issue, you may raise the matter at Deletion review.'"
 * Since you have already discussed this with and he has declined to restore the article, your next step if you want to pursue the matter is WP:Deletion review.


 * I have to say, however, that I think you will be wasting your time, since I entirely agree with Jimfbleak that nothing in the article suggests WP:Notability in Wikipedia's sense. Blogging and Student Council activities are not notable, for poetry see WP:AUTHOR. Yes there are a lot of references, but they are local or trivial or self-published. Before going to DRV, I suggest you read WP:Notability (summary), WP:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability and WP:Bombardment. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Pilar Corrias
''I, Littlewolf678, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Littlewolf678 (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Pilar Corrias. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

User:Tharun Tanisha HARIHARAN
Personal Resume — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tharun Tanisha HARIHARAN (talk • contribs) 16:52, 24 October 2015
 * ❌. Wikipedia is not a place to post your personal resume - please read WP:NOTWEBHOST. There are sites like Facebook ad LinkedIn where you can post this sort of thing, but Wikipedia is different. JohnCD (talk) 17:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

BodyBananasDk
I dont know what i have done wrong with the article.. I have not been using any copyrightet things??? -Oliverskj1231 (talk) 17:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Bill Hudson (guitarist)
This is a working musician with a large discography and worldwide fanbase. -2605:E000:6260:9200:4510:B468:8789:C03E (talk) 20:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 22:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Gjirafa.com
The page was deleted due to article A7. I have provided references and now i am providing one more from Springer peer reviewed journal that specifies Gjirafa, Inc as the instituion affiliation. Link here: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-25733-4_6 -185.67.177.26 (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * That isn't what we mean by "coverage".
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

The Forum at Exchange Square
Content could be merged into Exchange Square (Hong Kong) instead of being deleted, and it's a valid redirect, if not a viable standalone article. -Zanhe (talk) 00:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * done, restored, pruned a bit, and added mergeto and mergefrom tags to each article as appropriate. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

File:BigBangTheoryTitleCard.png
Previous revisions must have been larger. However, 300px is too small for those preferring to see images in 400px. If you can restore previous revisions, I can request bot-shrinking. -George Ho (talk) 22:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * the largest revision in the deleted history is 640x360. Personally I don't think that's large, but I don't know if we have a firm guideline on it. Seems to be the resolution of an old-style cathode-ray television screen. I don't see the harm in restoring them all. They were originally deleted as unused non-free media and then only the one version was restored without any commentary about image size. So... ✅, all revisions restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Boyd & Jenerette
I've been editing for years and have never had a page removed so quickly. I contested the speedy deletion with no dialog following. There were plenty of creditable sources, and the firm is of some type of importance to the city of Jacksonville, being that it is the largest locally based firm in the city. If this page is worthy of deletion than so are a whole lot more that did not get swept up in such a stringent filter. I also made a few additions to the page since the tag was put in place. I'm willing to work on making the page work. It is a business of significance in Jacksonville. -Mathew105601 (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks to me like all the sources were either self-published by the company, press-releases, or local-interest coverage, not nearly what is required by WP:CORP. A7 looks appropriate to me, and that makes it ineligible for requests to restore on this page anyway. So....
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment some A7s are too quick, but this was 11 hrs. after the last edit, which is usually considered reasonable.  DGG ( talk ) 05:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

File:947 station logo.jpg
The previous version of this logo file was deleted after it was replaced with a smaller version to comply with Wikipedia's non-free content policies. Discussion at WP:NFCR has however concluded that the logo is too simple to be copyrightable in the US and thus isn't covered by the non-free content policy; the older and larger version should be restored. -Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✔️ by Fuhghettaboutit. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:National Book Development Council of Singapore
175.156.223.228 (talk) 01:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Bravest of the Brave
Sourced article on upcoming next Adam Ant album appears to have been deleted because, according to deletion log, page originally started life as redirect to album title's namesake before being cannibalised for use for article on album. Even if the latter is is a valid technicality in favour of deletion, then should not content be transferred to a new page for the album? -62.190.148.115 (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * No need to do anything as the page was not deleted, but moved to Draft:Bravest of the Brave. You can edit this page to improve it, and click the green submit draft if you are ready for someone to move it back to being an article. The move reason stated: Azealia911 moved page Bravest of the Brave to Draft:Bravest of the Brave: Per WP:NALBUMS "An album should not have an article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Is it okay to wikilink to Draft pages?  If so I would like to restore links on pages such as Adam Ant discography and Adam Ant Is the Blueblack Hussar in Marrying the Gunner's Daughter (the previous album) so that other interested users can find their way to the draft page and assist with updating. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 12:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * No, you shouldn't wikilink from mainspace into a draft article, but no reason not to put a request for help, with a wikilink, on the article talk pages. JohnCD (talk) 18:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:CHRISTINI All Wheel Drive Motorcycles
''I, Schristini, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Schristini (talk) 21:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If, as your username suggests, you have a connection to the subject, please read WP:Conflict of interest and the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 21:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Jon Carnegie
''I, HappyBe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' HappyBe (talk) 23:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

I would like to edit it and resubmit -HappyBe (talk) 23:43, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kadooge
Attrib75 (talk) 03:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It was Draft:Kadooge Staszek Lem (talk) 03:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

User:Lightbreather/Kaffeeklatsch
Please also restore its talk page. It was deleted per SCD U1, however this was not exactly a personal page, but a community project, and others posted there as well. It was mentioned in media ("How Wikipedia Is Hostile to Women"), and therefore it is of historical interest. The deleting admin is retired, so I am posting here. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair enough to restore, but not in Lightbreather's user space since she wanted it gone. Can you suggest an alternative home? Based on the content it should be placed, or moved around the userspaces of ladies. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * AFAIK, in wikipedia there is no page ownership, even for user pages. We delete user pages out of courtesy. It was a public space and moreover, it was intended as such. Once you start a ball rolling, you ain't got no private control. It must be findable where it was, where it is numerously linked to. The page nothing that can hurt her personally, so privacy concerns are out of question as well. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ since speedy delete is supposed to be only for non-controversial actions, I have restored it. Also a previous MFD voted to keep this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Dreamers of the Ghetto
Requesting that this page be Userfied. I wrote this article, which was recently A7'ed, and I believe I can reword/source the article so as to substantiate notability. I'd like to start with the work I've already done on it. -Chubbles (talk) 02:18, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ to User:Chubbles/Dreamers of the Ghetto. You should really have asked the deleting admin,, but I'm sure he would agree. Please check with him before returning this to the mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I did so before coming here, but there was no reply. If the article as it is now is still in A7 territory...well, then something pretty substantial happened to A7 since I last checked on it. Chubbles (talk) 08:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Motohiro Kawashima
Due to him having more interviews these days, I will be able to improve it and add more sources. I also want to rewrite it in a way that will show his importance -DrDevilFX (talk) 19:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Feel free to start a new article. There isn't anything in the deleted history worth restoring. Just a broken English sentence "Is a Game music producer Worked on [list of 4 games]" and nothing else. Try working on it in draft space and move it over to main space when you're confident it's in good enough shape to be kept. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

step forward pakistan
Step Forward Pakistan is a student based organization which is very popular in pakistan, So i request you to kindly undelete my page and make it visible on Wikipedia. I can give you registration certificate and event details etc. -39.41.59.170 (talk) 18:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do, the article isn't deleted. You are free to participate at the deletion discussion Articles for deletion/Step Forward Pakistan if you want. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lemuel Shattuck
''I, 97.124.162.246, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 97.124.162.246 (talk) 21:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Lemuel Shattuck. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Robert Tutak
I have provided proper references earlier with the article, the deleting administrator overlooked the references. I believe this article has enough facts to prove valid points. Please review -Saudjubaer (talk) 03:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Robert Tutak, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:12, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Leon Cruze
this is my own page i want to undelete it and if some of criteria are not completed plz mail me i will complete all your procedures and all proofs that you need you can mail me what is problem in my article i will improve it thank you. -Leon Cruze (talk) 07:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself - you can do that on social-networking sites like Facebook and LinkedIn, but Wikipedia is different, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is choosy about subjects for articles, see WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 10:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G. Philip Stephenson
Ebabau (talk) 12:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:G. Philip Stephenson. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Four Kings
(This was the AFD Articles for deletion/Four Kings, its hard to find for some reason), multiple articles published in the BBC and other sources, I have no idea why the AFD speedy deleted the article so hard. I'd like the article restored to Four-Kings if possible, as the current namespace is occupied by an unrelated television program -Prisencolin (talk) 02:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Prisencolin, this looks like it didn't have much content. The one sentence in the article was "An electronic sports team, alternatively an upcoming film produced by David Kohan." Basically, this is a X mark.svg Not done because there isn't anything worth restoring. There's nothing to prevent you from creating a new article, though. Anywho, it looks like it was speedied for no context, which is a little strange given that you could tell what the article was about for the most part. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:12, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Well that's amusing, isn't it. Just double checking but was there ever any more content in the edit history?--Prisencolin (talk) 15:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Prisencolin: No, it was only ever that one sentence. Given the amount of times the BBC has covered them, you'd think that there'd be more, wouldn't you? The only other content was a link to their official website (Four-Kings official website). Here's the full content, with tags and all:

An electronic sports team, alternatively an upcoming film produced by David Kohan.

Point & Click TV Show
''I, ChazManS, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' ChazManS (talk) 20:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Did not finish editing page-forgot -ChazManS (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Point & Click TV Show Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

List of Master of Science in Bioinformatics
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Karl MacDorman (talk) 20:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

It is of enormous value for potential MS in Bioinformatics students to be able to track down programs in various countries. By deleting this list, you force students to rely on private, paid sources. These tend to be slated toward for-profit institutions, which provide less value for money. Given that Wikipedia has aligned itself with open access, it makes sense to make unbiased lists of programs freely available to potential students. This will keep their tuition down, because nonprofit programs will not be forced into a spending arms race with for-profit institutions.
 * That isn't what Wikipedia is for. Wikipedia is an encyclopædia. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

1. How is being an encyclopedia inconsistent with maintaining lists of bioinformatics programs? An encyclopedia is "a book or set of books giving information on many subjects or on many aspects of one subject and typically arranged alphabetically."

The list is information on the subject of MS in Bioinformatics programs.

2. Wikipedia is rife with such lists--for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Master_of_Laws_Programs

Why treat Bioinformatics in an inconsistent manner?
 * The list page you cite should probably also be removed. (5,000,000 articles / ~250 active admins = logistical hell) Second, you yourself state that the purpose of the page is to compete with paid directory sites, which Wikipedia is not in the business of doing. Ergo, if that page is inappropriate, so is the Master of Laws Programmes page. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

But you are competing with encyclopedias, are you not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.90.253.253 (talk) 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Only in the most literal sense. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. see List of Master of Science in Bioinformatics. However this will need references to those lists of these that are already available elsewhere to prove this is a suitable topic for a list.  And also the criteria for inclusion needs to be clearly given to stop indiscriminate entries. An AFD is a real possibility. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

GreatAuPair
Per my comment here at Articles for deletion/GreatAuPair, please move GreatAuPair to Draft:GreatAuPair so I can work on it. Pinging so he's aware. Thanks, -Cunard (talk) 03:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done now at Draft:GreatAuPair Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles Severance
''I, Astralian, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Astralian (talk) 12:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Charles Severance. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. JohnCD (talk) 15:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Judith H. Myers
''I, Carries mum, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' As of October 18th 2015 I had not edited this article on Prof. Judith H. Myers since February 2015 (over 6 months). The main reason is that I got a back injury in April that kept me away from work until September 2015. I am now returning to all of the projects, research and teaching that I was forced to drop, while in rehab. This includes completing the editing of a wikipedia page for Judith H. Myers, for which I have lots of additional content and 3rd party supporting references -Carries mum (talk) 19:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" See WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 20:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Safe T Punch
Reasons given for deletion were that the invention is not important enough and that the article was self-promoting. I contest the first point on the following grounds: It is a real new tool not unlike a Hammer or a Screwdriver, that has a function, a purpose and an imperative for all those who travel on public transport. A Hammer or a Screwdriver both satisfy notability guidelines have wiki pages. The second part of my challenge is in regard to product promotion. I went to great lengths to see the page wasn't an ad, but as informative as possible where history, the law and clearly laying out the uniqueness of the Safe T Punch was, I believe, necessary to satisfy notability guidelines. -Christenmiversen 09:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. This has some mild promotional tones to it. While you don't tell people to run out and buy it, it does have a PR type tone to it, specifically the services section. However I must warn you that it is still within JamesBWatson's right to nominate it for WP:AfD, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Business Casual (netlabel)
''I, Mhf93, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mhf93 (talk) 02:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

unfinished, new sources available -Mhf93 (talk) 02:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Samrat Raichand
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -SamratBornToPlay (talk) 14:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * 2=i was late, i just going to add an reference with Samrat Raichand
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
 * Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself. See WP:NACTOR for what an actor needs to have achieved before having an article. JohnCD (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Waterstart
Sergem1 (talk) 17:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Carolina Theatre (Charlotte, North Carolina)
''I, Fortibus, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Fortibus (talk) 00:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" JohnCD (talk) 09:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Las Vegas Showroom Orchestras
''I, Jfdicurt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jfdicurt (talk) 16:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Need to continue editing. This is a historical topic that is suitable for wikipedia. -Jfdicurt (talk) 16:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * @Jfdicurt: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Asha Gopal
''I, Anugopal13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Anugopal13 (talk) 12:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * @Anugopal13: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

CHIREC International
as it is 27 years old school and is got ranked no.1 as best CBSE school in state and 12th rank as International Best Day School in India — Preceding unsigned comment added by RVNA1989 (talk • contribs) 12:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator . Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 16:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * @RVNA1989, Jéské Couriano: X mark.svg Not done. In addition to what Jeremy said, this was a blatant copyright violation of multiple pages, infringing on previously written content such as this, this and this. I have undeleted and re-deleted to note this serious problem. I appreciate that you, RVNA1989, are not one of the users shown in the page history – so the infringement does not appear to have been by you. However, since this looms in the background, please note that if any new effort to write an article was started, such copying would need to be avoided. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Komal Jha
Hello, may we please request that the page for actor Komal Jha be undeleted? She is a well known actor in India and many of her contemporaries have fewer films to their credit but still have a page. Hers was deleted. Restoring her page will be really useful. She has a verified facebook page with almost 4 million fans https://www.facebook.com/KomalJha?fref=ts  Please help us restore her page? -182.56.90.73 (talk) 02:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Komal Jha, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This was speedy-deleted 4 times before the AfD, which I too closed as a 5th consecutive speedy delete, as pure promotionalism. If there are any equally bad articles in this field, please list them for deletion also.  DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The article would need considerable improvement and if that ever comes, it would be best to use Articles for Creation. FWIW, I asked DGG to comment for better consensus. SwisterTwister   talk  06:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: I made some researches and the subject looks notable although most contents about her comes from The Times of India. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 23:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

I wish to request
This page I am requesting was deleted on the ground that it lacks merits on Wikipedia policy. I accepts the fact for deletion and thus shy not away from that very fact. But along the line, I created the page solely to depicts my personality on the search engines. I know that for professional ethics, I might not be accorded acceptance to restore the page back to me. But I will crave for your conscience to look into my heart and see how frustrated I am now restore it back to me or to delete it fully from deletion page so as not to allow public to view the information I supplied.

By providing those information, I thought I would have an opportunity to review them later at my conveniences but now it has exposes my wanted hidden background to public. I wish you can give me second chance to improve upon it or help me to remove the page from public glance. Thanks in anticipation. -Asokogi (talk) 08:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * once something has been deleted from Wikipedia, within a few days it no longer appears in Google searches. A search on your name no longer shows any reference to the page about yourself which was deleted in April.


 * Any references to the draft page about your book which was deleted recently will also drop off the search results soon. In fact I did a search on the name of the book just now, and found no reference to its deletion here. However, there are "mirror sites" which copy Wikipedia (as they are allowed to do), and it may take longer before a page deleted here is no longer shown there.


 * I will restore that draft page if you like, and you could continue to work on it, but I must warn you that I see no sign that it meets Wikipedia's quite demanding notability standard for books, explained at WP:Notability (books), and if it were posted as an article it would in my opinion be deleted again, possibly after a deletion debate which would remain on the record.


 * What you should understand (though we do not explain it as well as we should to new users) is that Wikipedia is not a place for people to "depict their personality on the search engines". There are plenty of social-networking sites like Facebook and LinkedIn for that, but Wikipedia is different - a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is choosy about subjects for articles, and people are strongly discouraged from writing about themselves or their own affairs. Once anything is posted here, others may edit it and comment on it: if you do not want the public to view that, you should not post here. JohnCD (talk) 10:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Thiha Htet Aung
Thiha Htet Aung played his first appearance for Yangon United Senior substitube by Pyae Phyo Aung against Zwegabin United draw 2-2 in 25 October 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kgkalay (talk • contribs) 03:19, 26 October 2015‎
 * Are you able to add a reference for that? If so the article can likely be restored/recreated. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Assuming a reliable source can be found, it should be undeleted, since he passes WP:NFOOTY (as Myanmar National League is a fully professional league). Joseph2302 (talk) 10:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles Rumback
''I, Serlahc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serlahc (talk • contribs) 05:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Charles Rumback. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Golf Society Code of Practice and Constitution
''I, Peter Heron, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Peter Heron (talk) 09:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Death(novel)
''I, Timee5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Anthony Avram (talk) 21:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * this was restored back in 3 September 2014 and no one improved it at all. What plans do you have to make changes this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I forgot that the article had been restored, I plan to make changes this time. Anthony Avram (talk) 21:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * very well, ✅, restored to a new location at Draft:Death (novel). Unless it is worked on reasonably soon it will be deleted again, and we shall be unlikely to restore it next time.
 * For advice on writing about books, see Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. People are discouraged, but not prohibited, from writing about themselves or their own books: in that respect, please read WP:PSCOI.
 * I have to say that I think you are almost certainly wasting your time here. Wikipedia is quite selective about article subjects: the notability standard for books is explained at WP:Notability (books). It is extremely unlikely that an article would be accepted until the book has actually been published - by a mainstream publisher, not self-published - and received reviews in reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 16:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Kadhalo Rajakumari
THIS IS UNIQUE PAGE -Rakeyg12 (talk) 16:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * this page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Kadhalo Rajakumari, and that is where you should comment. First, read WP:Notability (films), particularly the section WP:NFF: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles", and WP:DISCUSSAFD. It may be too soon for this article, but if the discussion decides it should be deleted, you could ask for it to be "userfied" - moved to a draft page where you could work on it until development of the film has progressed to the point where it meets the notability standard for an article. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Bosco (fictional character)
Chasedrgc1223 (talk) 13:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * , is this a character you came up with yourself? If so, please understand that Wikipedia is not a place for things that you made up WP:ONEDAY and that articles of this nature will not be accepted on Wikipedia. If this is an actual character on a real show, you will need to provide evidence that the show existed and that it would pass notability guidelines. Notability is not granted by the show existing in some format - you need to show where it was covered in independent and reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, now that I've taken a look at this it is extremely obvious that this was just a joke that Chasedrgc1223 wrote. It's extremely unlikely that there would be a live-action cop show that would have a crossover with Naruto, an animated series. The article also claims that it crossed over with other shows as well. JohnCD, this looks like it's a hoax article. Do you want to delete it as such or leave it? It's in the draftspace and could possibly be considered a sandbox test since it's not really hurting anything, but I don't think that this will ever be more than just someone playing around in the draftspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It's now at MfD here Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bosco (fictional character) JMHamo (talk) 00:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy-deleted as hoax. Searches find no mention of the "controversial Bosco & Qball and Naruto cross over" which was said to have been commented on by "many critics". - sorry I delayed doing this and gave you the trouble of starting an MfD. JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

FokerLegend
Foker is a real person -Nkzlxs (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Since I deleted this, I will leave another admin to reply, but meanwhile read Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 16:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ No credible claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Red_Square_Nebula.jpg
To be used in Red Square Nebula article under fair use. Source: http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~gekko/redsquare.html. Copyright tag: non-free fair use -189.25.244.198 (talk) 02:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) This image is the only one existing of this nebula, no other free images exist.
 * 2) This image is a unique image of nature's work and is not likely to replace the original market role of the original work.
 * 3) This image is scaled down to identify the subject but not bring out excessive detail and only this image will be used in the article.
 * 4) This image is published before outside Wikipedia and this image's place here makes the image no more accessible than it already is.
 * 5) This image is encyclopedic and used to identify the subject in question.
 * 6) This image is compliant with the image use policy and is not obscene, rude or attacks or infringes the privacy rights of the subject.
 * 7) This image is used in the infobox of the Red Square Nebula article, and if this image is used in another article, another rationale must be added for that article.
 * 8) This image is used to identify the subject in question and its removal would be detrimental to reader's understanding of the subject in question.
 * 9) This image is used only in articles, and not in template pages, category pages, user pages, disambiguation pages, other file pages or any namespace other than articles.
 * 10) This image is properly identified in the description with a proper source, proper copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
 * I am unconvinced by the irreplaceability of this image. Someone else could point a telescope and take a free image. Or an artist could paint it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This nebula has a very small angular diameter, much smaller than the Red Rectangle nebula. Due to the exceptional conditions required to obtain a free image it would be an unreasonable burden for the average person to do so. --189.25.239.98 (talk) 21:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Anil Chorasiya
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Directoratul (talk) 08:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This is going to be a X mark.svg Not done on my end because I can't really see where he's notable at this point in time. For that matter I can't see where Teen Kaminay is really notable enough for an article either. The basic rule of thumb with directors and films is that they are only notable if they have received coverage in independent and reliable sources. I don't see where this unreleased film passes notability guidelines, so I'm going to nominate it for deletion via AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I've also nominated Brajesh Pandey for deletion as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Teen Kaminay
This page is about an upcoming Bollywood feature film. This film has been made by MFA Motion Pictures and has renowed crew in the film. I request you for undeletion of this page -Directoratul (talk) 15:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Articles for deletion/Teen Kaminay, and that is where you should comment. First, read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (films), particularly the section WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk) 16:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Brajesh Pandey
This page is about Brajesh Pandey who is a Bollywood producer and screenwriter who has 30 years experience in film Industry. I request you for undeletion of this page. I will reglarly update with all the details oftenly -Directoratul (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Articles for deletion/Brajesh Pandey, and that is where you should comment. First, read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (people), especially the section WP:FILMMAKER. JohnCD (talk) 16:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Anil Chorasiya (2)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Directoratul (talk) 15:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)