Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 217

Resul Hasan Ertaş
The Page should be up and viewable to all readers of Wikipedia until the 25th of February 2106; for circumstances and changes to the page will occur in the following weeks. It is not necessary to delete the page without full permission or knowledge of the initial page creater. Request the page to be undeleted as soon as possible. The person in the page will be signing for a new professional football team and the page needs to be viewable for the process to workout. Please undelete the page. -24.52.198.53 (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Resul Hasan Ertaş, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. If something exciting happens to make this person notable on 25th of February 2106, (or some other earlier date) eg a game played in a fully professional league, then this page could be recreated then. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Commenting as the deleting admin, the IP above (who appears to be the article creator) is reminded that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; if he plays for a professional team, then his article can be restored as notability will be established, however simply signing does not establish notability, and pages that do not meet the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia are not retained for the purpose of promoting someone to a potential employer. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

User:Mattmill30/Comparison of computer hardware market products
The article contains a comparison of the functionality of the current products available in the computer market, which once matured will be submitted for review. -Mattmill30 (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done U5 invalid, most user edits were in mainspace. Though the topic is probably too big for your level of detail. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:43, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Zi Corporation
The article has had some rather significant sections deleted (for no good reason) during its lifetime. I think this corporation is quite interesting and significant in terms of how software patents work (or not). I have made a proposal that include the deleted content here: User:Egil/Zi Corporation -Egil (talk) 13:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done See if you can improve the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

ReConnect Hungary
This is not a promotional page but an informational page, exactly the same as Taglit Israel and other birthright programs. Our program is even referenced in Taglit Israel! This was the reason we received: 02:13, 19 December 2015 DGG (talk | contribs) deleted page ReConnect Hungary (A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events): G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.224.240.24 (talk)
 * X mark.svg Not done This was deleted as an A7 and can only be restored by the deleting admin (DGG) or via deletion review, however I will say that the page did seem pretty promotional since it seemed to have been written with the intent to entice readers into signing up with the program. I'd say that it's unlikely that this will be restored, as it's something that I wouldn't have restored if I'd been the deleting admin. As far as content on other pages goes, what's on other pages doesn't mean anything since those pages could also have problems with promotional prose or notability that hasn't been fixed yet. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I deleted it both for promotionalism and for no indication of importance. Thee are indeed a number of similar programs; some notable, some not yet notable. The Taglit article has well sourced criticism, and the program includes 40,000 visitors year. Your article discusses no criticism, and has covered a total of 30 visitors since the start. There is only one independent source, and it is not primarily devoted to the program. The comparison is absurd.      DGG ( talk ) 06:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I tagged the article for speedy deletion because there was nothing noticeably salvageable and was best restarted. I also note that when starting a new section here, there's a noticeable header saying not to mention an article deleted with speedy A7 and G11. SwisterTwister   talk  13:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:ListenUp
Lpwords (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

optionpricing
I want the contents of the page emailed to me. Here it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Optionpricing/sandbox I spent months working on this math paper. All of the old archives are purged. It was deleted for U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host -Optionpricing (talk) 19:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Reflections Unheard: Black Women in Civil Rights (Film)
''I, Nevline, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Nevline (talk) 06:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. In particular, make sure you add more sources to show the film is notable. BethNaught (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Oussama Belhcen
The article has it's sources -Othmanebenjelloun (talk) 11:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Seems to have been deleted by mistake so ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:31, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example
Seliseli88 (talk) 13:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Auramics
Auramics is indeed a notable band. and then click the "Save page" button below -Echoechoradar (talk) 22:13, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * this page is for requested deleted pages to be restored, not for giving your opinion on if a page should or should not be deleted -- samtar whisper 22:16, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌  the article has not yet been deleted but is the subject of a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Auramics.  You need to make your case there but "they are a notable band" isn't enough of an argument. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nthep (talk • contribs)

User talk:AspieNo1/sandbox
''I, AspieNo1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' AspieNo1 (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Request undeletion AspieNo1 Talk and Sandbox.

Wikimedia unlocked images for use in articles.

Sandbox contains work and pages, coverage in the last few years of interest to Autism wikipedia and Irish Project

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:AspieNo1/sandbox https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AspieNo1/

AspieNo1 (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I have restored the sandbox and its talk, but User talk:AspieNo1/ did not have a deleted page to restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Cynthia Dawn Ritchie
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -GlobalCitizenUSA (talk) 06:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

It is my understanding that my page, Cynthia Dawn Ritchie, was deleted because of "copyright infringement" of Rose Lane Studio Productions... I am the author/creator of the very same content on Rose Lane Studio's website and create the content for our studio. I am the owner of the content, image, etc. I am writing about myself. Unsure why the page was deleted.
 * Because we can NOT accept anything that has been published on a website that doesn't explicitly release its content into the public domain or under a suitable copyleft licence. You need to read WP:Donating copyrighted materials and then follow the instructions on that page to allow us to use that text. (Do note, however, that our neutrality policy is not negotiable, and if the text is in and of itself overly promotional you're better off writing the article from scratch.) — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 06:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * ❌ This page is written in a promotional style, and has no clear claim to importance. So we won't be reversing the deletion and there is no point in trying to donate the copyrighted material. Instead it would be better to start from scratch with an encyclopedic style and references and write at Draft:Cynthia Dawn Ritchie. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:50, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Star Wars: Science Fair (book)
As a result of my repeated requests to the administrator who deleted this page to nominate the article for deletion and follow the proper deletion process through consensus, I have decided to come here. I kept pointing out to the additional sources that I provided on the talk page which also get ignored and have been deleted alongside the article. Our latest conversation as seen:

"Please un-delete Star Wars science fair as there was no consensus in deleting it. If you're wondering which article I'm talking about it's here . It has a number of reliable sources and sufficient coverage which I pointed out in the talk page. Thank you--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 20:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

There were also sources covering the subject that I posted on the talk page. And no, goodreads is considered a reliable source on Wikipedia and it's not a blog to my understanding. I don't use blogs as sources in compliance with WP policy. If you feel it does not meet WP:GNG, undelete it and open a nomination so consensus can be established. There you can explain your reasons why you feel it does not meet general notability. This happened with another previous article I created, also currently a stub, where an admin deleted it. When I requested an un-deletion and nomination, the consensus was keep with voters pointing to small, but reliable sources. If you still wish to delete it, you can un-delete and nominate it explaining your reason. I even provided coverage for this topic on the talk page including text and video coverage. If you un-deleted it, people would see and form a consensus.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 22:20, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Are you seriously claiming that Goodreads is a reliable source in terms of notability? It's not. Your sources were WorldCat (proving that the book exists), the Queens NY Public Library Catalog (likewise), and a personal blog. Your external links were Goodreads (as mentioned above), and a page on Planet Science that doesn't even mention the book. The stuff you mentioned on the talk page is similarly useless: it's available via Google Books (again, proving that the book exists), and then there's blogs and library catalogs. And... that's it. Even all those videos you dug up - those are about the experiments, not the book. I'm not claiming that this book is not notable, I'm saying that so far, you have not shown that it is. There's no evidence. None of the evidence you supplied is valid. If you want it restored, show me real evidence. Okay? DS (talk) 23:50, 25 December 2015 (UTC)"

The videos we are referring to discuss the contents of the book and not just the fact "that the book exists" as the admin keeps repeating. There are plenty of search results for this topic online but I added a few as I felt they were sufficient enough. If the community believes references and external links in the article plus the additional sources provided on the talk page (which got deleted with the article) are not sufficient enough, it can be established through a nomination for deletion process. And to mention once again, another article I created was going to suffer a similar fate of deletion, until it was un-deleted and consensus established it does have general notability, so once again I am requesting that the keep/delete be done through this process rather than a single individual's decision. Thank you for reading this.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC) -Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 21:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * There's additional notable coverage and references to the book in Scientific American . If these are not sufficient, let the proposed deletion process determine this. Thank you.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 23:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * First - what do you think "notability" actually means? Because "an elementary school included the book on their list of Books Of Science Fair Ideas" isn't notability. The Scientific American book of projects (ScienceMadness) is from 1960, and therefore does not mention this book in any way. Your link to a page of Google search results shows an article from Scientific American that includes the phrase "star wars" and also "science" and "fair". It does not mention the book "Star Wars: Science Fair" at all, not even once. I read all of your sources, both the ones you supplied in the article and the ones you put on the talk page. None of them are usable. None of them contribute towards notability for this book in any way, shape, or form. None of your videos were about this book. They did not contribute towards notability for this book. Even if we were to accept Planet-Science as a source for notability, that page you referenced does not mention the book "Star Wars: Science Fair" at all, not even once. Did they copy that "how to make a blaster sound effect" section from the book "SW:SF", or did they write it themselves? If you think they copied it from the book, where's your proof? Please. I like restoring pages. I want to restore this page. But you have to give me something to work with, otherwise it stays dead. DS (talk) 03:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Endorse if this wasn't a 100% lost cause I would suggest going though AfD but that would be overly bureaucratic -- Guerillero &#124;  Parlez Moi  04:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Give me the the draft of the article and I'll take it from there. Don't have to publish it, but let me have all the content that was lost. I'll work on it as a draft and add some new sources. I wasn't sure about using the scholastic site but I believe it passes WP:RS. If you don't want to publish the article, drop it on my talkpage and I'll save it to work on trying some new sources. However I still 100% stand by using goodreads as an external link as many book articles use reviews from there and yes the videos were experiments right out of the book. If you checked the books activity titles, they match the same activities as the videos it cannot be coincidence that it uses the same title as the book as this example. If you claim you want to restore the article, I take your word for it. But at the least you can give me the sources and draft version, which I'm sure is not too much to ask for and is negotiable. Only thing is I'm working on number of SW pages so this will be delayed until it is published because of my attention to these other pages. I also stillthink an AfD would have resolved this as users do provide sources when giving their verdict.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 05:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Des van Jaarsveldt
If this was a page about Des van Jaarsveldt, Springbok Rugby Captain of 1960, please can you undelete? -MKzim (talk) 10:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. please expand and add references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Eugene_Richie&redlink=1#/editor/0
100.4.157.93 (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Eugene Richie. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Michael Cavadias
''I, Mouseshine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mouseshine (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Grant Schreiber
''I, GeorgeCaulfield, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' GeorgeCaulfield (talk) 06:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Christopher Ho Chee Kong
{{subst:refund|1= Christopher Ho Chee Kong |2= Please Check the citations on google scholar citations. It is 404 citations. (https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=rg8Fi4AAAAAJ). Associate Professor is a valid position in Malaysia and Asia. It is an academic position of honour just below a Full Professor. He is also an elected fellow of numerous international societies. The National University of Malaysia, which is where he is from, is a reputable university. He is therefore a notable physician in Malaysia and Asia if not the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.26.186.2 (talk) 14:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Christopher Ho Chee Kong, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user {{user1|Biblioworm}}. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Unspell
Request undeletion of article. Yabti (talk) 15:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Shirley Gnome
''I, 2001:569:7006:5200:C908:E94C:FAFF:972C, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2001:569:7006:5200:C908:E94C:FAFF:972C (talk) 17:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -2001:569:7006:5200:C908:E94C:FAFF:972C (talk) 17:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

I thought I had submitted my changes for review, but apparently they didn't go through/weren't reviewed. I am still fully committed to getting this article up on Wikipedia. Thank-you!
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:His Grace Dr. Abraham Mar Seraphim
''I, Sphilip1604, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Sphilip1604 (talk) 19:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:F. Scott Yeager
I was unaware of the G13 policy and had been awaiting notification that an experienced editor had reviewed the entry. I am committed to making this entry better than acceptable and had already put considerable work into it. Please approve this request that it be undeleted. Thank you. -20:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Danan (talk)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Eyo nation
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -168.235.197.131 (talk) 20:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ It was speedy deleted under the A7 criterion. The whole page was "Eyo nation is a newly created music label in Cameroon. It is located at mile 3 nkwen bamenda...", with no claim of importance. However if you have references and a claim of importance you can recreate it, perhaps as a draft:Eyo nation since you are not logged in. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:F. Scott Yeager
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Danan (talk) 20:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ✔️ no need to ask for this about 4 times. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Legend of Enyo - Australian made Children's Program
''I, Mldowling oz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mldowling oz (talk) 11:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

I would like to review the original article I wrote and see if it is suitable for the missing article referted to in this URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Bark_Productions -Mldowling oz (talk) 11:57, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I would suggest it be called The Legend of Enyo as it about the program rather than the company. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Girls Have I.T. Day
''I, Ewoodrow17, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ewoodrow17 (talk) 04:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This was promotional and was also copyvio from this site. Copyright is automatically assumed and it is not OK to take material directly from elsewhere, even if you represent the organization and/or wrote the material yourself. Even if the material was given up as fair use, it would still require a total re-write to fit NPOV guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:58, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Girls Have I.T. Day
I plan to make immediate edits to this article and resubmit it. -Ewoodrow17 (talk) 04:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This was deleted as WP:G11 and WP:A7 by Bbb23. A look at the page does show that it's fairly promotional, likely because large swaths were taken from this site, making it a copyright violation. You can ask Bbb23 if he'll restore it or take it to WP:DRV if he refuses, but it's unlikely that either will restore it given that it was promotional and a copyright violation. He may e-mail you a copy of the material, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Something else to take into consideration is that you will also need to show where this specific event has received coverage in independent and reliable sources. Sourcing that talks about general principles and topics, but is not specifically about the event itself (ie, about women in STEAM in general) will not count towards notability since notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by the topic of women in STEAM being a notable topic. That the event is an interesting, good idea doesn't really count either - it just makes it more likely that there will be coverage. What you will need will be something like coverage in a newspaper that isn't owned by the college or written by someone involved with the event (ie, no press releases). For example, The Catholic Sun likely would not be considered an independent source because it's written by the Diocese of Phoenix and XCP is a Catholic school. This gives the Diocese an interest in promoting the event, since they would naturally want the school to be seen in a positive light. Now this paragraph in a book published by Corwin Press could be seen as a good reliable source since Corwin is part of Sage Publications, an academic publisher. It's a full paragraph, which is a good thing. This source by itself isn't enough to show notability for the event for its own page, though. You might want to see about just writing a neutral one paragraph summary about the event and including it in the article or the school itself, since it's fairly rare for a school specific event to merit its own article, as coverage is usually local, primary, and/or fairly brief. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences logo.jpg
Previous version(s) of this file were completely deleted instead of suppressed so that the file history is still visible. Please restore previous version(s) and suppress them. - Steel1943 (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * ❌ That is pretty normal practice. The first upload was by Anna Frodesiak, a different but blurred colour logo, then replaced by a black and white one like there is now by Svabhiman, who then reverted themself. Anna Frodesiak deleted the earlier versions, so it is a G7 like situation. The B+W & colour images were different and should have been uploaded with different names. So it's fair enough to stay fully deleted. No attribution is missing for the upload. If you like you can edit the file description. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Per what you just stated, the edit history that pertains to the "previous" image should probably be deleted since it has nothing to do with the current file? Steel1943  (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

User:Uzthegeek/sandbox
I will delete the external links. I was unaware they were not allowed. -Uzthegeek (talk) 13:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Uzthegeek (talk) 15:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ❌ THe whole thing was promotional, removing a few links would not fix it. So if you want to write on the topic start from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yateley United FC
''I, Emdeaze, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Emdeaze (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Rob Walling
''I, 173.166.227.86, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 173.166.227.86 (talk) 19:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

I wanted to edit and re-submit the page for inclusion, but did not make the changes in time and it expired during the draft process and was deleted. I would like to undelete so I can edit and re-submit. -173.166.227.86 (talk) 19:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mariyam Khalif
''I, Hayat.akbar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Hayat.akbar (talk) 23:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Brian Norwood
Brian Norwood is a public figure in the US who's biographical and profession information is of interest -Mdg149 (talk) 01:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅, restored, and being discussed at Articles for deletion/Brian Norwood. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Miss Iraq
significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page.

Please read the submission again on Miss Iraq page and consider the news articles and references before deleting. All articles and references are originating from 18th December 2015 to 30th December 2015 because Miss Iraq 2015 was held for the first time in 43 years on 19 December 2015.

Besides several international references provided below and on the submitted article, refer to the Iraq's Ministry of Culture website below: http://crd.gov.iq/pgDetails.aspx?NID=1936

Other international articles: http://edition.cnn.com/2015/12/22/middleeast/miss-iraq-pageant/ http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/28/miss-iraq-beauty-pageant-marred-by-death-threats http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/23/world/middleeast/miss-iraq.html?_r=0 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mycah-hazel/why-miss-iraq-2015-is-a-v_b_8851830.html http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/the-pageant-moment-you-probably-missed-589787715794 http://time.com/4157202/miss-iraq-threats-2015/ http://www.elle.com/culture/news/a32822/miss-iraq-crowned/ http://www.cosmopolitan.com/style-beauty/a51219/miss-iraq-crowned/ http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2015/12/250824.htm -Hbeaulandk (talk) 13:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * This was deleted at AfD back in 2007 and again a few months ago by Mr. Stradivarius, so we can't really restore anything here. If you want this content restored you will need to go to deletion review. Normally you'd have to go through the closing admin, but I note that this wasn't closed by an admin so you cannot petition that editor to have it restored. DRV is your only option here. However I do have to ask: are you related to any of the accounts that were blocked as sockpuppets during the AfD? If so, you need to sign in under the main account and request an unblock as block evasion will not help you restore the page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Because there was a history of sockpuppetry and you need to go through DRV for restoration, I've semi-protected the page for three days. Please take this through DRV. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:DJ Cummerbund
''I, J. Gary Gildersleeve, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' J. Gary Gildersleeve (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Several other Wiki articles require subject to have a Wikipedia page to properly source -J. Gary Gildersleeve (talk) 15:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * On a side note, I'm not sure what you mean by the second sentence. Do you mean that you want to create articles related to the DJ? If that's the case, you need to be careful. Even if you establish notability for the DJ, that doesn't mean that everything affiliated with him would be notability, as notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. It's actually pretty common for a musician to have a page, yet not have any for their individual work. This is because it's normally far easier to assert notability for a person as opposed to a specific CD or musical work. Also, be careful of sourcing. If an article is very brief then it's easier for people to dismiss it as a WP:TRIVIAL source. This is frustrating since this happens a lot with musicians, especially ones that are active on YouTube or some other, similar site. Good luck, and remember: the WP:TEAHOUSE is always open if you need to ask any questions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ellen Wilson Dwellings
''I, Jbockman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jbockman (talk) 15:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:10, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Golden Triangle (Missouri)
Speaking as a local, this term is used in common parlance to describe the area. Used when talking about the general characteristics of the area as well as in real estate listings. -68.70.64.58 (talk) 05:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

health revive
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nyitvancouver (talk) 10:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Kiwi,

Please undelete health revive. I found the article on Yahoo Finance and added to the source. I will be posting more information about the hospitals who have benefited with this technology.

Thank You!
 * ❌ The Yahoo finance story is just a press release from the company. If there are independent sources, you can write a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

John Paul Morrison
This page has apparently been deleted by a vandal - also my User page seems to have disappeared also - it is incredible that someone can do this without my being notified! -Jpaulm (talk) 23:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


 * ❌, Please appeal to User talk:Guy Macon or User talk:JzG. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * It looks like the page was deleted as a vanity/autobiography page per WP:G11, unambiguous promotion. It looks like you were heavily editing the page and even tried to remove a conflict of interest notice from the page. As an admin, I have to say that this really, really doesn't make you look good and makes sentences like the following one seem very promotional: "While in Montréal, he started developing the ideas which led eventually to flow-based programming, whose concepts are now (roughly 40 years later) being picked up by major companies and computing practitioners world-wide." That you have content on your userpage about your book and a link to your article doesn't really help either. You need to talk to about this. He may be willing to restore it, but I think that he will likely require that you not edit the page. Personally, I would heavily discourage you from editing your own article on Wikipedia. As far as your userpage goes, I don't see where your userpage was ever touched or deleted. I can only assume that you are referring to the article, which would not be "your" article in that there's no WP:OWNERSHIP on Wikipedia. My recommendation would be this: go to WP:COMPUTER and ask for someone to create the page anew for you. Once that's been done DO NOT TOUCH THE ARTICLE. I need to repeat this: do not touch or edit the article directly. Instead, only suggest edits via the talk page or by asking someone at WP:COMPUTER to make the edits for you. At this point an admin has deleted the page as spam and there's a reasonable argument to be made for this, so any further direct edits to the page could be seen as you trying to promote yourself. This goes for the page for Flow-based programming as well. I can't stress enough that it's very highly discouraged for people to edit articles that directly pertain to themselves, especially since you stand to gain from the page reading in a certain manner, both financially and reputation-wise. You've been warned about this in the past. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * This article seems to have been deleted in error, based on the posted result of the deletion discussion, back in 2006. Since then, by the way, Flow-Based Programming, the technology that John Paul Morrison pioneered, is becoming more and more popular (I can give references!).Jpaulm (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No, the error is yours: Wikipedia is not a vehicle for self-promotion. Guy (Help!) 16:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I've moved this down for the article flow. You must contact (although the page in question seems to have been deleted by ) about this deletion. I'm also somewhat puzzled about the way you've phrased "the technology that John Paul Morrison pioneered" gives off the impression that you aren't Morrison. Could you explain this? Also, REFUND will not restore the content given that it was deleted as promotion and because if you are Morrison, you stand to gain financially from it being present on Wikipedia. I'm going to reach out to WP:COMPUTER on your behalf, but I have to say: that you're not doing this yourself and instead looking for your specific version of the article to be restored does not reflect well on you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I also must state this: if Morrison is only really notable for flow-based programming then it makes more sense to have the article be a redirect to the article for flow-based programming. You need to assert how Morrison/yourself is notable outside of this topic. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:49, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Basically, there was no error with the deletion. You are not helping yourself out by insisting that this was an error or an act of vandalism. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Countly
''I, Gorkemcetin74, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gorkemcetin74 (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * This is fairly promotional, to the point where it needs an almost complete re-write in order to meet NPOV guidelines. I'm hesitant to restore this, but I wouldn't mind e-mailing you the content. On a side note, the article gives off the impression that you are a paid editor, so you need to disclose this on your userpage. It's just written too much like a press release to have been written by someone without a conflict of interest. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:48, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

RBS Law Associates
On wikipedia, there are a number of law firm's page that are the same as was mine. There was nothing in it which was meant for advertisement of the firm. The only purpose of the page was to add the introduction of the firm because it is a controversial one in Pakistan and largely talked about. -Genuinepolicy (talk) 07:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator . Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. The existence or absence of articles of a similar topic is irrelevant to whether or not your article should exist. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 10:22, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ It had a fairly promotional tone throughout. Not only that, but a claim of importance is unclear, there being no third party, indpendent references at all. Perhaps Jimfbleak could restore it as a draft, but only if there are independent references to prove notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Rachel (Raya) Takserman-Krozer
''I, Vkguf, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Vkguf (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:S M Sehgal Foundation
S M Sehgal Foundation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seedsforchange (talk • contribs) 18:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" I have restored the history of Draft:S M Sehgal Foundation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

amazon orders
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -78.151.177.188 (talk) 12:47, 2 January 2016 (UTC) done by mistake as trying to delete the ones that were not required
 * Hello. You will have to explain better what page or issue brought you here. Was it a change to an existing article that was removed, rather than a page that was actually deleted by an administrator? No page by named "amazon orders" has ever existed under any capitalization, nor in the draft namespace, nor under the older AfC form of name with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation prefixed. There is also no page in the last 10,000 deletions that contains the word "amazon" in it.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Tahvon Campbell
Please restore the edit history to this article prior to it being deleted by PROD -JMHamo (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ —  Earwig   talk 19:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Josef Hollywood
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pilot109 (talk) 14:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  20:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Please also read WP:Autobiography. In this case do not attempt a draft or deletion review either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Aime Duval
''I, 188.146.70.80, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 188.146.70.80 (talk) 19:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I want to continue creating the article -188.146.70.80 (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * There's really no content beyond an infobox with a tiny bit of information, so there's not really anything to restore here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  20:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * So you can create the draft again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chennai Institute of Technology
''I, Ramamurthiramesh, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ramamurthiramesh (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ I restored it and found it was copied from the institutes web pages. So it is deleted again. You will have to rewrite this in your own words.  In any case there is already an article titled Chennai Institute of Technology. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

File:FFXIV battle interface.png
Image was originally deleted via WP:CSD (unused non-free image); it was orphaned over the course of an article rewrite that no longer required it. I believe there is now a use for this image again in the same article. -Axem Titanium (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please use this to avoid deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Axem Titanium (talk) 18:13, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dru Brown
''I, SaradeWaard, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SaradeWaard (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Té Company
''I, Freder13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Freder13 (talk) 23:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Giovanni Niubo Freak Night 2015.jpg
OTRS ticket 2016010310011334 received, please undelete. -Darwinius (talk) 20:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please apply correct OTRS received template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

MGTOW
The grounds given for previous deletions are no longer true. MGTOW should redirect to either Maximum gross takeoff weight or Men Going Their Own Way, whichever is Primary, as does Mgtow -Chrisrus (talk) 06:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done I'd prefer that this not be unprotected until there's some consensus as to where it should redirect. There's a discussion at Talk:MGTOW and there's no true consensus just yet, although it seems like the more obvious redirect target would be the aviation term given the hatnote at the top of the article. Basically, I just want to make sure that there's a consensus so this doesn't turn into a revert war or something like that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Check-green.svg Done MGTOW into a disambiguation as per the consensus at Talk:MGTOW. Chrisrus (talk) 04:35, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Samkutty Pattomkary
''I, Tarapillai, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Tarapillai (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)