Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 23

Inv.
I've been constantly blocked in the process of creating an artist Biography. I don't understand what's the matter, considering the article has been verified and sources provided (Inv Official Website). -ThisIsInv (talk) 22:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌. Wikipedia is not for self-promotion - see WP:Autobiography. Also, the article gave no indication that you are notable to the standard required by WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 14:47, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Unconscious - The Real Life
Wikipedia

The philosophical science was not found in your list, deletion log, review log, etc. Would you please help locate and provide the information?

Regards Sushil10s
 * I'm not sure what your problem is? The article is there - click on the blue link above. But please read No original research, especially the passage headed "Synthesis of published material that advances a position". Are your conclusions, and the phrase "Unconscious - the real life", actually present in the sources you cite? JohnCD (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: article now at AfD here. JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Excel Communications
This page was deleted because of supposed copyright infringement from http://www.sidhecommunications.com/excel-communications.html which is obviously a bogus link hoarding site. Please Undelete the article. Thank you. -Baldbrian (talk) 21:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Restored. But it might need to be toned up in terms of NPOV. Protonk (talk) 21:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Site now listed on the mirrors. Protonk (talk) 22:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Philip Stamper
 A couple years ago, there was a Wikipedia article on Philip Stamper with cited information from articles about Stamper and about articles he published, as well as both professional wrestling events Stamper was a part of and films he had appeared in. However, when Stamper began working for a rival professional wrestling organization (Pro Wrestling Unplugged, which has also since been deleted), the article was repeatedly vandalized & marked for deletion. A number of people have contacted Stamper saying they have attempted to add a new article, but they are blocked from doing so. One reason listed was the article came off "like a resume". However, as you view various actors and especially other people in the world of professional wrestling (especially independent professional wrestling), that's all there is - what companies they have worked for on the minor independent leagues, movies they have been in. Since the original deletion, there have been additional information about Stamper - including new publications, movies, and wrestling. -Psphenom (talk) 00:40, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * So, um ... create a new article that meets Wikipedia guidelines. I recommend drafting it in your userspace, then asking for a review of the potential article prior to moving it into articlespace.  See WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Adam Elliot Portrait
OTRS 2010101810001123 raised with an offer to release copyright. This does not preclude speedy deleting if unsuitable for other (non-copyright) reasons. -Fæ (talk) 09:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 11:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Now I can see it, I can confirm it is a duplicate of File:AE Portrait.jpg already on Commons. Bit of a waste of time unfortunately, I have requested re-deletion and emailed the requester back on OTRS explaining why this happened. These scenarios make it obvious why most OTRS volunteers are admins. Fæ (talk) 11:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Tetrafusion
'Article was covering a very notable underground band who just released an album on Nightmare Records, who are distributed by RED Distribution, which is a branch of Sony Music Entertainment -- is this not a notable indie label situation, according to No evidence from WP:RS that band meets WP:MUSIC. No recordings on major labels or notable indie labels.'''? This band's album also charted at #13 on Amazon's Bestsellers Chart under the 'Hard Rock & Metal' category, which I figured was a form of a national chart. Both of these band's albums have received non-trivial reviews on just about any music review website (which you can view on the recently deleted pages at Absolute Zero (Tetrafusion album) and Altered State (Tetrafusion album). This article was NEVER updated with anything resembling WP:COI and was only updated with notable, objective, and neutral information. There are plenty of bands who have Wikipedia pages that are even less resourceful than this one that never got deleted, such as Scale the Summit, who are also distributed by RED Distribution. Animals as Leaders only has two references as my article did, both even from the same resources (Blabbermouth.net and a local newspaper publication in their respective hometown). Periphery (band) lists a ton of very non-neutral information that has absolutely no references or sources to back it up, going on about who left the band and what guitar pedals they use...how is this viable information? Why are these pages still existing when this one was deleted, although EVERY sentence on this page had a source to quote it from? Please restore the article and do NOT delete it, it has been attended to with totally objective information and care. This article also went unedited and undeleted for a year, so I don't understand why anything has changd 18 months later? Thanks. Msm041 (talk) 12:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC) -Msm041 (talk) 17:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌ This article was deleted as a result of an AFD discussion so it can't be restored here. It needs to be discussed with the deleting admin first and then at deletion review if you are not satisfied with his answer. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:19, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

ron laytner
 This was a biography page of Ron Laytner. What happened to the page? No known reason the page should have been deleted -Fergielives (talk) 20:16, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If you try to read the page, it tells you quite clearly why it was deleted: "Unambiguous copyright infringement: of WWW.ronlaytner.com" ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 20:25, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Power Rings (Webcomic)
The website has been around for 6 years; it deserves an article. -Multiverseman (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Multiverseman/Power Rings (webcomic). You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page and advsied you to come here if you want it restored as draft, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted.--Tikiwont (talk) 22:29, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Amotz Shemi
 This is one person he has changed his working area from physics to biotech -Gilifocht (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Amotz Shemi, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — ξ xplicit  21:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

MacroData NetDrive
MacroData NetDrive is a well-known software, ranked as #1 when searched as netdrive at google -Terranbin (talk) 00:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done per request on my talk page. — ξ xplicit  03:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

VOKLE (website)
Video conferencing application. Lacks any substantial coverage from reliable sources (and I was unable to find any in a quick search). Fails WP:GNG. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

This person says that VOKLE lacks any 'substantial' coverage, this person failed to realize how many time's we've been covered in large tech blogs online. Just to name a couple, check these out: Arianna Huffington: http://huff.to/cRrau3 / Tony Robbins: http://huff.to/cRFrVv / TechBuzz (ReadWriteWeb article): http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/join_us_for_a_live_video_qa_session.php / The Next Web articles: hhttp://thenextweb.com/apps/2010/07/16/vokle-wants-to-give-everyone-a-custom-video-conference-platform/ http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/08/13/facebook-takes-on-ustream-and-vokle-with-facebook-live/ / Huffington Post: http://huff.to/9vuyHq / Building43: http://www.building43.com/videos/2009/12/24/a-distributed-tv-station/

We've also had some large scale events recently, here's a couple good ones: Arianna Huffington: http://youtube.com/watch?v=4DFXnEmmcUE / Tony Robbins: http://youtube.com/watch?v=tGdJxMg9MQY / Reddit CoFounder Alexis Ohanian: http://youtube.com/watch?v=mEoSAV5BEbE / Ben Folds: http://youtube.com/watch?v=PmkJe9ITMho

email me for any additional information!

-shant ( VOKLE.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shantkiraz (talk • contribs) — Shantkiraz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article VOKLE (website), you may have a conflict of interest.  In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:


 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Fidelco Guide Dog Foundation
Editor determined that the posting had "Unambiguous advertising or promotion: Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject (CSD A7))." I submitted a revised article but got no repsonse. Fidelco is a humanitarian organization that is certified by the International Guide Dog Foundation and Charity Navigator. It is of the highest caliber and to delete it from Wikipedia is a disservice to persons who may want to know more about it or to utlize its service. Thank you for your consideration.

Jack Hayward, director of communications The Fidelco Guide Dog Foundation, Inc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.157.50 (talk • contribs)
 * No doubts about the noble cause of your organization. The deleted version is also visible here. I am not sure what revised version you are referring to, but as far as I see the deleting administrator has answered, affirming that it does not seem to meet or notability guidelines. At this point i can only suggest you to review once more the answer as well as the various links given. If there are any other sources than the mentioned book, it can be brought to deletion review, ideally with a revised version. This board here is only for uncontroversial restorations.--Tikiwont (talk) 15:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Futuristic Sex Robotz
 for use on Article Incubator/Futuristic Sex Robotz -     Eclipsed   ¤     19:55, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * note: don't want the page restored, just want the content to see if it usable for the incubated article.     Eclipsed   ¤     20:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Page and history is now at User:Eclipsed/Futuristic Sex Robotz. Protonk (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Millport (radio show)
The page has been deleted on the grounds that it is a 'Non-notable radio show'. The series is a brilliant surreal comedy parodying aspects of Scottish small-town life on an island in the Clyde estuary. It is one of the best pieces of work by a very talented Scottish writer and actor, Lynn Ferguson, who has her own Wikipedia page. The editor who proposed removal is from a different cultural milieu and I wonder what qualifies him to judge the significance of this programme. -86.138.87.83 (talk) 15:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. In general we try to assess significance not on the basis of individual cultural opinion, but via independent reliable sources, so you may want to add some more of those.--Tikiwont (talk) 15:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Anne_Seisen_Saunders
 Article deleted after necessary references were added -Bodhisattvajr (talk) 17:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Restored. I do note that the references appear to be either tenuous or from relatively marginal sources.  I don't know if this article will survive an AfD but it meets the minimum for BLPPROD, in my opinion.  I'll leave a message with the deleting admin. Protonk (talk) 17:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Longevity by Cosmic Acceleration Theory
I can provide reasoning as to why this theory is valid, please contact be to further discuss this undeletion request at, Mark Williams Electrical Engineer Texas A&M University Class 2002 -Krunchlol (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * User created new article with content identical to this post on Talk:Longevity_myths. User also copied and pasted this content here and here. User does not seem to understand the distinction between namespaces. Suggest user takes new article request to Requested articles. Uncle Dick (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done Talk page comments belong on the relevant talk page, not in the article namespace, which is why the page was deleted. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Francoise Cherry-Cohen
Francoise has done quite notable work, on two (2) of the presently highest-rated sitcoms still aring on television, has worked on a multitude of shows, has been nominated for multiple awards, credited as a notable "scenic designer" in this site, and has general industry recognition. Her site should be restored. -Tortfesor (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. However the article will need to be improved to reflect the subject's notability or it may be deleted via the Articles for Deletion. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Ana Santiago
No reasoning given''. -Uctpasa (talk) 03:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I would like to ask to have the deletion of the page ANA SANTIAGO be reconsidered on the following grounds:

A. This person has founded and heads the only Impact Evaluation Network in Latin America and the Caribbean. This network is part of LACEA (http://www.lacea.org/portal/index.php), the most important international association of economists interested in doing research in the region. She is a permanent Honorary Member of LACEA, award given by her contribution to impact evlauation reserach and policy relevance for the region ( http://www.lacea.org/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24&phpMyAdmin=b883a10db6c19d415348047740f5c4b0&phpMyAdmin=f18f79e76e8f09c4b5c658d1db20ad3f).The contribution of founding the network is is widely referred to and attended by policymakers, governments, NGOs, and academics in the field. This contribution falls into the category "creative professionals" of the notability criteria, mostly 2 and 3 with c) of number 4:

"Creative professionals Scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals: 1.The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. 2.The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. 3. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. 4. The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums."

B. Further, this person is part of the very small team of persons that have been given the mandate from the Haitian government to redesign a major reform and reconstruction of Haiti's education system following the 2010 earthquake. This has been cited in other pages such as MARCELO CABROL

"Reconstructing Haiti's Education system after the 2010 earthquake: President Preval gave the Inter-American Development Bank, IDB the mandate to work with the Education Ministry and the National Commission preparing a major reform of the Education System in a 5 year plan. New Schools for Haiti (in French) 5year plan to reconstruct"

and PAUL VALLAS "After Haiti's 2010 earthquake, President Preval gave the Inter-American Development Bank, IDB the mandate to work with the Education Ministry and the National Commission preparing a major reform of the Education System in a . [New Schools for Haiti (in French)] [5year plan to reconstruct] 5 year plan]]; Mr. Vallas has been working with the Bank in this effort. For more information: Education Division Chief Marcelo Cabrol"

C. Finally, she leads the all the research and evaluation of one of the main Multilaterals (IDB) on Education topics, directly responsible for ongoing pilots and evaluations for over 200 million dollars. Part of this work has been taking the implementation and designing the impact evaluation of the Teach for America (national teaching corps) model to the region currently in place in Chile, Peru, Argentina, Brazil, and Colombia. The evaluation design improves on the US evaluations so far, fac that has been recognized and cited in the region and outside (including the US and Europe) by Wendy Kopp, founder of TFA.
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Courcelles 03:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Ana Santiago
No reasoning given''. -Uctpasa (talk) 03:23, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Courcelles 03:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Ananda handunge
reasoning -Ananda handunge (talk) 19:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done and will not be done. I have also deleted your userpage as a blatant promotional piece.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a networking or resume hosting service. Protonk (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G12. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.  HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   19:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Goldsea


And older version of the article, which I did not write, was deleted in 2009, apparently due to objections over its lack of supporting references or notability and some vague objections to its tone.

I write another Article under the title Goldsea. It was written painstakingly to avoid tonal controversies. It contained 31 references that supported every one of the material statements int he article. was improved upon by several others as well as myself. Today, it was deleted without warning on the ground that that the original had been deleted following discussion.

In short, there was no opportunity for anyone to review the deletion decision on what is essentially a completely different article.

This is particularly troubling in light of the thousands of Wikipedia articles are stubs that are not supported at all by outside references and are not written with nearly as much care, skill and useful information. For example, even within the category of Asian American Media, articles like Asianave, Asianweek, Little India, Koream Journal, Asianave fall far short of the standards used in writing the Goldsea entry.

Given that Goldsea is the longest running professionally written Asian American website, and given that it was founded by the publisher of the first national magazine for Asian Americans, I believe it easily meets the notability criterion. Therefore, I believe the article merits review by some objective editors who have not been involved in this process. And if the deletion decision stands, it should be supported not only by clear rationale, but some clear standard as to in what form it can be resurrected. AA Patrol (talk) 22:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G4. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.  HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * To add a bit more to what HJ Mitchell wrote, please take a minute to read Notability and WP:WEB. While the article was indeed referenced, all of the references were the site itself, so notability was not established. Since the original deletion was because the site fails WP:Notability, that needs to be addressed in any rewrite.


 * If you'd like to give it another go, I'd suggest you write a version at a subpage of your user page, such as at User:AA Patrol/Goldsea, and ask one of the admins who deleted the page at various times to take a look and verify that you indeed have addressed the notability issue. HTH.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  06:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

File:LIVE at the Purple Onion.gif
not my image, needed for article, I will fix it, thanks -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Amotz Shemi
the page was deleated before becasue it was suspected that it was talking about two diffrent people - Amotz Shemi started as an astro-physist and for the past 7 years has been involved in the bio-med world -Gilifocht (talk) 08:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Amotz Shemi, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. This has already declined before. — ξ xplicit  21:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Grenfell College Student Union
The page was placed up for speedy deletion, even though notability is not solely enough of a reason for it to be so. As the page contained a information properly formatted and uncontroversially stated, expanded on the information available on the students' unions in Newfoundland and Labrador, and was -- up until its deletion in October, fairly regularly updated by various contributors from the area, I feel that to restore this page is indeed more helpful than removing it all together. With further edits and improvements, I believe the initial page can indeed be made much better, but those willing to do so have been disheartened by the deletion of the article, which they and I were unaware of at the exact time it was done. This article was a piece of the overall work being done to expand articles on the bodies and organizations which are involved with Memorial University of Newfoundland, the Canadian Federation of Students and student unions throughout Canada. -209.205.246.34 (talk) 01:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Appears to be an uncontested proposed deletion, not a speedy. --j &#9883; e deckertalk 01:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --j &#9883; e deckertalk 01:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Teleki cserk.JPG
Image was deleted a year ago as redundant at Commons, now deleted from Commons but we still need it here -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. Protonk (talk) 01:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Barack Obama's visit to India
reasoning -27.56.22.212 (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌ As announced prominently at the top of this page, it is not for the pending deletion of any articles, and furthermore, it is not for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions. Since this has not yet been deleted, and is currently under discussion at Articles for deletion/Barack Obama's visit to India, your request is doubly misplaced. In any event, you failed to provide any rationale for seeking its undeletion so you've hit a trifecta.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

HallPass Media
Hello- I have noticed that the Wikipedia page for "HallPass Media" was deleted. Here is the reasoning that I have been able to dig up: 01:30, 28 July 2010 SchuminWeb (talk -Millas (talk) 23:15, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ as a contested proposed deletion. Protonk (talk) 00:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

List of Major League Baseball hitters with three home runs in one game
this article was deleted: no references cited, non rarity of the event. There is no list of this on the internet. The list deleted was very helpful. Please restore the list and let us check the data and supply the reference. thank you  -OvidPete (talk) 18:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌ This was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/List of Major League Baseball hitters with three home runs in one game so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you believe the discussion was wrongly closed, or you have new information, you should first approach user, the admin who closed the deletion discussion; then, if not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Yak Shaving Day
 This is a quite popular phrase, included in the Jargon File (http://ftp.sunet.se/jargon/html/Y/yak-shaving.html) and Wikitionary (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/yak_shaving). Once restored, you should propose replacement with a REDIRECT to Ren and Stimpy and copy the content of this stub of a page to there. However, it will still need to be made available in order for anyone to paste it into the article and to make it into a redirect. BTW, holy mother of FSM, this page has A LOT of links to it! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/_Yak_Shaving_Day -143.215.103.113 (talk) 11:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Allen McCulloch
 The decision (based on consensus) was to REDIRECT this article, thus keeping its history intact. Instead, Courcelles deleted it first, THEN redirected it, thus circumventing the intention. There's now no way to determine what needed to be merged from the original article. This (unfortunately) happens a lot. Perhaps Admins need to learn what REDIRECT actually means. -Flatterworld (talk) 17:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the lecture. I'll restore the old content, but in the future please just ask the deleting admin to do this. Protonk (talk) 17:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Equinox NC (band)
objection to PROD -148.85.247.180 (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Restored and nominated for deletion. Please see Articles for deletion/Equinox NC (band). Protonk (talk) 17:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Jah Levi
Denamuse (talk) 19:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

An article written for Songwriter/ Producer Jah Levi several years ago was erased. (may also have been under Jah Levi & The Higher Reasoning)

The issue is that another performer (now deceased) by the name of Hugh Mundell also briefly used the name Jah Levi for his work on other albums, and it appears that those in this performers' camp may have been responsible.

There is currently an disambiguation for the name Jah Levi attached to the article for Hugh Mundell.

The Jah Levi of which I speak is alive and well, has used this name for 30 years, and would very much like to have his wiki appear without fear of erasure.

Is there a way to find the erased material? Is there a way to prevent this from happening again?

Thank You.

DenaMuse
 * ❌ You're correct that Jah Levi was deleted (twice) on the basis of speedy deletion criteria addressed to redirects, but the content on the songwriter you are here about was a blatant copyright violation, and was reverted back to a redirect on that basis. As such, it cannot be provided to you or restored. Jah Levi & The Higher Reasoning has never existed. If Jah Levi and/or the band is notable (see WP:N generally, and WP:BIO and WP:BAND specifically), an article can be created afresh but must not copy and paste copyrighted material, nor only superficially modify copyrighted material.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And the fact that he wants an article about him in Wikipedia is completely irrelevant to anything whatsoever. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Crash title.jpg
Supporting article Crash (1984 TV series) for this NFF was previously deleted, then incubated, and now moved back to main articlespace. -    Eclipsed   (t)     01:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done — ξ xplicit  01:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

File:GaeilgeGuinness.jpg
not my image, I will fix licensing -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:09, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done. — ξ xplicit  23:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

jerome coullare
pas de justification sur personnage réel, autopromotion -80.12.110.201 (talk) 15:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English.  When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments.  For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.  -- Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  16:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The article as it stood was indeed promotional, read as autobiographical, without 3rd party reliable sources. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 16:21, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Enlightened Singularity
The reason for deletion was Copyright Infringement of http://www.jaaga.in/enlightened-singularity. I am the Founder of Jaaga.in as well as the author of this article and wish to extend the theory on Technological Singularity with mine on Enlightened Singularity on Wikipedia. I am new to Wikipedia and might be doing something wrong - apologies in advance. But really would like to add in this article in Wikipedia so that others can add to it over time. -Arcnawiki (talk) 05:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I can't get that website to load. My guess is that the article was deleted because your website either has a copyright notice declaring that rights are reserved (Note that the text needs to be released under specific licenses) or contains no notice (And is automatically copyrighted.  I would also suggest that if you want to edit wikipedia about Raw Kurtzweil, there are many articles relating to him and the concept of the singularity.  It isn't necessary to start a new article.  I can help you find those articles if you wish. Protonk (talk) 05:38, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, got it to load. Is there a copyright page or tag on there? Protonk (talk) 05:41, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Combination Lock (disambiguation)
This was an article based on a television game and pilot I worked hard on for many years and I don't understand why it was deleted. -Mrtv1 (talk) 08:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * After some serious searching, I believe that you were looking for Combination Lock (game show). The article was deleted two months ago after community discussion here, and as such cannot be undeleted here.  You are welcome to raise the matter at WP:DRV, but you will need to address the issues that resulted in its deletion. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 08:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Miss Intercontinental
Miss Intercontinental is a big pageant that started about 40 years ago and have been countinued to now. It has pages in wikipedia that they are in French, German, Italy, Spanish, Portuges, Dutch, Persian and Romanian but there is not English page. -azarrrrrr (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Miss Intercontinental, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. Protonk (talk) 22:37, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

CareCloud
reasoning : In September, 2010, CareCloud was selected by IBM to be one of five Finalists competing to win IBM's SmartCamp program for the Silicon Valley region. The SmartCamp program is a global venture that seeks to identify and incubate the "world's smartest startups." While CareCloud is based in Florida, not Silicon Valley, the company took top honors at the SIlicon Valley SmartCamp event, overcoming several companies native to California. On September 9th, 2010, CareCloud was named co-winner of the event, along with Streetline Systems, a company that develops web-enabled sensor technology for real-world analytics. CareCloud was also awarded the PR award by Ballou PR. The SmartCamp victors from each location receive the full support of IBM in growing their companies, including both entrepreneurial expertise and technological resources. In addition, the winners from each location were invited to compete for the world championship at a final event in November, 2010. As co-winners of the Silicon Valley chapter, CareCloud and Streetline will take part in the IBM SmartCamp World Finals in Dublin, Ireland. CareCloud is the only competitor representing the field of healthcare and one of only three American companies competing in the Dublin event. The winner will be crowned IBM Global Entrepreneur of the Year.

^Significant -68.157.105.234 (talk) 16:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Personally, I'd say that the IBM support will certainly help the start-up, but that it does not yet appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

John Ferber
No reasoning given''. -74.207.196.74 (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

The article was deleted for "unambiguous advertising or promotion." The user, Fastily, who deleted this article is no longer a member or contributor to wikipedia.


 * ❌. I'm inclined to agree with the deletion decision, as the article does appear to be a promotional piece rather than an encyclopedia article. Also, the current account status of the admin doesn't bear much on the decision; people come and go from wikipedia all the time.  If you wish to appeal to the community, please list this deletion at deletion review. Protonk (talk) 18:35, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Err, on what planet is Fastily no longer on Wikipedia? ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 22:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Well he does have a retired tag on his userpage, but, more to the point, he gave his bit up, so asking him to reverse a deletion is obviously fruitless. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Ricky Hana
The page is being re-written to Wkikpedia guidelines -Ricky Hana (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.  HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:50, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, read WP:Autobiography for why writing about yourself is not a good idea. JohnCD (talk) 20:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Dominic Sewell

 * Information on this composer is freely available in the public domain ad verifiable - he is a published author, articles exist in the Telegraph, Independent and BBC World Service websites for example. The composer is also cited as having written the first ever live performance version of Henry V. -86.135.28.37 (talk) 10:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ❌. The article was deleted as a copyright violation. Either a copyright release must be made as described here, or an article must be written from scratch. In either case notability will need to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Tim & Jean
This article was deleted at AFD (Articles for deletion/Tim & Jean) with the comment "No prejudice to recreation if sources are found." Since then more sources have been written, eg. I requested the deleting editor to restore this article to allow me to make the necesary improvements but looking at Shimeru 's recent history they appear to be taking a break so I'm bringing it here as I believe giving me a copy of this article to work on is not controversial. -duffbeerforme (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The creation of this section appears to be broken. I tried twice to start it by entering the the request section and editing the resulting page but it came back as No reasoning given. I later copy pasted my reasoning in after saving with the no reasoning message. duffbeerforme (talk) 15:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Trying some more and putting in nonsense works well, just not the above reasoning. I removed the diff in the above and it previewed right. Putting in just the diff comes back as No reasoning given. duffbeerforme (talk) 15:55, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That sounds reasonable to me. Just please make surte that the sourcing is reliable and meets what WP:MUSIC would expect.  But with a close like that I think you are free to recreate the article in good faith.  One more thing!  Make sure that the sources are added in the first or second revisions of the article.  Many editors patrol for recreated articles and will quickly tag one for speedy deletion if it isn't obviously different.  I'll take a look at the template being weird. Protonk (talk) 16:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Two of the sources I intend to add are Sydney Morning Herald (above) and The West Australian, both major newspapers in their respective cities. duffbeerforme (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * duffbeerforme (talk) 16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Let me know if you run into trouble. Protonk (talk) 16:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I didn't make myself clear, I'm asking for a copy of the deleted article to work on. (If I was just starting from scratch I wouldn't have come here, I would have just done it). duffbeerforme (talk) 17:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * My bad. The article is now at User:Duffbeerforme/Tim & Jean, along with all the history.  When you are done just move it back into the mainspace. Protonk (talk) 17:37, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll move it back soon. duffbeerforme (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Aid Children Without Parents
No reasoning given''. -67.170.204.104 (talk) 19:34, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Aid Children Without Parents, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Protonk (talk) 20:34, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

List of sponsored sports competitions
The original article was deleted as a work in progress for having too wide a critiera for inclusion. I have now narrowed the critera so I'd like to reques undeletion. What I would like placed back on the page is shown where I have made the improvements at User:The C of E/List of sponsored sports competitions. -The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 13:54, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done As also announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/List of sponsored sports competitions, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Noting that the administrator who closed the discussion, JForget seems to be semi-retired, you could make a request at deletion review-. -Tikiwont (talk) 21:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Fire It Up (EP)
Fire It Up is an official release by Kid Rock (included on most Kid Rock discographies) and if it is undeleted I will personally add references and sources to the page (the reason why the article was deleted was from lack of sources or references). The article had plenty of information on the subject and deserves to be undeleted. Thanks. -Mrblinky (talk) 21:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Mrblinky/Fire It Up (EP). You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. The history will look weird, though as I tried to restore your versions only using initially the wrong target with Ron Ritzman userfying the rest at the very same moment, but we should be all set now.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Ionuţ Caragea
references, sources -Danielconstantin (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello my dear friends. How are you? I hope, very well. With all my respect, I propose you to recover the page of the Canadian writer Ionuţ Caragea (Romanian by origin and living in Quebec). Now he have good sources, criticism, important references in big and international publications and I think he deserve to be in Wikipedia. I founded for you the best sources, the best references and I demand you, with all my sympathy, to recreate this page. Thank you very much and I wish you all my best from Canada.

Ionuţ Caragea (Snowdon King pen-name)


 * 17 books, professional writer, member in Union of Writers of Romania


 * member of DAM Montréal, Montreal Diversity Artist, organism with the support of Canadian Heritage's, Canadian Culture


 * 3 times Winner in the national contest Helion, science-fiction

.
 * 2009 - Helion Prize, Science Fiction Arsfan Romania
 * 2008 - Helion Prize, Science Fiction Internet Science Fiction Database
 * 2007 - Helion Prize'', Science Fiction, Romanian SF Online
 * Appreciations in Romanian and English translations


 * Adrian Botez, Romania, Romanian Society of Science Fiction and Fantasy, official website
 * Jean-Paul_Gavard-Perret - „PASSAGE DES SEUILS”, Incertain Regard, France
 * Valeria Manta Tăicuţu, review of Delirium Tremens in Agero, Allemande, translation in Diversité Artistique Montréal, Canada
 * Marius Chelaru, review of The Man in the Black Box, in Convorbiri literare, Romania, translation in Diversité Artistique Montréal, Canada
 * Diversité Artistique Montréal, Canada, Petrache Plopeanu, review of The Black Priest, in Spaţii culturale, Romania, translation in DAM
 * Nicolae N. Negulescu, Diversité Artistique Montréal, Canada, review of Ionuţ Caragea’s first three books, in Luceafărul, Romania, translation in DAM
 * Cezarina Adamescu, Diversité Artistique Montréal, Canada, review of The Amnesic Guru, in Observatorul, Toronto, Canada, translation in DAM
 * Pachia-TatomirescuLuceafărul, Romania
 * Nicolae N. Negulescu, Luceafărul, Romania
 * Cezarina Adamescu, Luceafărul, Romania
 * Cezarina Adamescu, Observatorul, Toronto, Canada,
 * Petrache Plopeanu, Spaţii culturale, Romania,
 * Cezarina Adamescu, Agero, Germany, Munich,
 * Valeria Manta Tăicuţu, Agero, Germany, Munich,
 * Marius Chelaru, Agero, Germany, Munich
 * Pachia-TatomirescuAgero, Germany, Munich
 * Valeriu Cuşner, Conections, USA, New York

more results: Google.com

Not done As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Ionuţ Caragea, it cannot be undeleted through this process. You should make a request at deletion review. Skier Dude ( talk  04:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Saberwyn/Naval battle honour
Draft page deleted U1 after content was added to articles in mainspace, but I want to undelete, because I might be able to expand another article with what I think was there --- saberwyn 00:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done — ξ xplicit  00:54, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Wear it Purple
Noteable charity in Australia, against homosexual bullying. -Wearitpurple (talk) 04:38, 17 November 2010 (UTC) == hi, cricinfy here, dear as this website aims to serve the world of cricket, and we dont have any professional writer , i can send my data to u....write your own way  but allow public to avail our service. ==
 * ❌. The article was deleted as unambiguous promotion, which applies regardless of the nobility of the cause.  We cannot unilaterally undelete the article here.  If you feel the deletion was in error (this is distinct from disagreeing with the deletion), you may appeal it at deletion review. Protonk (talk) 05:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

website aims at to serve the public, and we were unaware to wiki policies as it was first time, our writer was unprofessional now we have changed our writer and have study your polices and guidelines so give us a chance to serve the world of internet. -59.177.6.71 (talk) 13:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * According to the logs we have never had an article at Crickiny or crickinfy. Please can you clarify exactly what page we are discussing. Spartaz Humbug! 13:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There is Cricinfo which has never been deleted, and Crickinfy which when deleted two years ago said only "It is a cricket blog having all the details which one cricket fan is looking for in a nutshell.." To have an article you would need to show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 14:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

terrence l. lakin
free speech vs. censorship in the media. political bias vs. objective fact gathering and reporting. george soros and direction of funding/advertisers and sponsors of wikipdia. -30- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.57.20 (talk • contribs)
 * What on earth are you on about? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm going to guess that the IP editor is upset about Terrence L. Lakin being a redirect, as a result of the discussion at Articles for deletion/Terrence L. Lakin. In any event, nothing for us to do here.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)