Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 231

Draft:Al Stohlman Award for Achievement in Leathercraft
''I, TheMagnusOpus, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' TheMagnusOpus (talk) 17:04, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:CableEye
''I, Inavaytor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Inavaytor (talk) 17:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

South Korean scandals
The topic is notable (see some related articles at User:The_Transhumanist/Lists_by_country/Political_scandals_of_x), the page might have been a mess, but I'd like to take a look to see if anything can be salvaged. I am asking just for a restoration to my sandbox, so I can review this. -Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ to User:Piotrus/South Korean scandals. If you want to use it, talk to, who deleted it after AfD, about undeleting. If you don't, let me know and I will tidy up. JohnCD (talk) 22:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Madonna-holiday-1983-6.jpg
File:Sire.png is now tagged as PD. Therefore, I changed the file's status to PD also. Previous revision should be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 04:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Lucky Star by Madonna Side-A 7-inch U.S. vinyl.jpg
File:Sire.png is now tagged as PD. Therefore, the previous revision of the image should be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 00:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Wajdi Shaya
''I, Farah Wajdi Chaya, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Farah Wajdi Chaya (talk) 11:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The Draft:Wajdi Shaya is not deleted so there is nothing for us to restore. The reviewer is looking for references from reliable places such as books, magazines, or newpapers.  Youtube is self published so it is not counted as reliable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

User:The Ministry of Truth/Userboxes/Nat Soc
Other userboxes like "Social Darwinist", "Stalinist", "This user supports a Totalitarian form of government", "This user prefers that the death penalty be used far more often." etc. also exist, see: User:The_Ministry_of_Truth/Userboxes. -Laber□T 16:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅, in view of the strong consensus at this 2006 DRV. I will ping, who subsequently re-deleted, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:MFD. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * should the image, which is now on the "bad image list", removed from it (because otherwise no one could use the template), or should it be removed from the template? --Laber□T 21:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * What bad image list? I don't find this userbox on MediaWiki:Bad image list. JohnCD (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It's File:Nazi Swastika.svg. —Cryptic 22:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Well of course it should not have been restored. The existence of this page is not helpful to the project, period. I've sent it up for CSD as pure vandalism, which it is. If anyone wants to take it to MfD instead, we can waste our time there. Herostratus (talk) 02:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Now at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Ministry of Truth/Userboxes/Nat Soc. JohnCD (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Martin Davies (Philosopher)
This should not have been deleted, he is a major Chair holder at Oxford University. I was just in the process of gathering further information when it was deleted. Please provide the initial information that was deleted. Thank you.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please expand Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will get on it this weekend.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 15:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Big Lean
''I, Da Degrees, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Da Degrees (talk) 14:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sonya Lea
''I, Sonyalea11, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Sonyalea11 (talk) 20:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Sonyalea11, you removed the tags from the article, which is still existent on Wikipedia. Normally you're not supposed to do that with a speedy deletion, but since this is a G13 this isn't as much of an issue as it would otherwise be. The only thing you need to do at this point is work on improving the article. I do have to warn you that Wikipedia discourages people from writing about themselves on Wikipedia, even through AfC, so I heavily recommend that you get someone from the WP:TEAHOUSE to help you write the article. I may take a look at the article to see if I can help clean it up. Now the other warning I have is that if the article is cleaned up and accepted, you should not edit it to re-add information to the article or do anything other than maybe make some very basic edits like adding new books to a list. The reason for this is that your AfC draft almost got nominated for deletion as spam - but the declining editor decided to give you a chance. Adding a lot of info to the page makes it more likely that you may make it promotional, which can result in the page getting nominated for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:IZAH
Rovoos (talk) 22:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Overview of Peter Livingston Myer, The Artist
''I, Russannrocks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Russannrocks (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This was actually moved to Draft:Peter Livingston Myer. I'm a little concerned about the article's promotional tones and I can't help but get the feeling that this might have been copied from somewhere. My inclination is to decline to restore it but to send you a copy via the e-mail you used to create your Wikipedia account. Check your e-mail, I'll be sending it shortly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Robby Starbuck
Page should be restored, See Additional sources of Notability

MTV article regarding the longform release of 5 videos for AKON album (Includes photo of Robby Starbuck & Akon) http://www.mtv.com/news/2039004/akon-announces-five-part-album-stadium/

Billboard article regarding his work with EVE & Gabe Saporta http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/the-juice/1556337/behind-the-scenes-of-eve-and-gabe-saportas-make-it-out-this-town

It's notable that he directed the official music video for the Paramount Pictures produced motion picture TERMINATOR: GENYSIS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSLFITzW0nA

see BET article regarding his work with AKON http://www.bet.com/news/music/2014/03/11/akon-opens-up-about-b-howard-being-michael-jackson-s-son.html

HitFix article regarding nomination for Grammy with Salaam Remi Feat. Akon Video http://www.hitfix.com/immaculate-noise/salaam-remi-talks-grammy-nominated-one-in-the-chamber-nas-and-jennifer-hudson

IFC Channel article on Billy Corgan that touches on Robby Starbuck's work http://www.ifc.com/2011/07/billy-corgan-and-the-fools-journey-part-1

I searched online to find his YouTube page has nearly 100 million views and 100,000 subscribers. This rationally tells me that his work is notable to many people.

From the previous citations on the deleted page page his work for Smashing Pumpkins, Akon, Eve, Sarah Bareilles, Megadeth, Snoop Dogg, Shiny Toy Guns and Metric is notable by community standards. He has been nominated for the best video music video award at the MMVA's on Much Music in Canada, Best Rock video & Best Video with a message at the MTV VMA's as well which was cited on the old page.

I believe in total the notability is very much established. Note the length of time this page was active with users updating & adding additional news/entries and pages for the name "Robby Starbuck" are included on various foreign countries wiki or encyclopedia sites.

See YouTube page for reference to his following: https://www.youtube.com/user/RobbyStarbuck — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:e000:224b:4c00:795c:280a:a22d:a145 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 22 April 2016
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Robby Starbuck, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:League Of Everybody
''I, Frankrochin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Francisco Renteria 19:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:22, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Brian Vallee headshot.jpg
Permission received by OTRS. 2016040610017612. - Kharkiv07  ( T ) 01:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please add correct OTRS template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

ppd
speedy deletion, meets WP:BIO for winning The International 2015, also Liquipedia content is licensed under CCBY-SA so it should be an A12-Prisencolin (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please update with claim of importance, and references! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Gregory B. Maffei
2016012610017911. Permission confirmed under CC-By-SA 3.0 & GFDL. If non-notable, please move to draft space. Please ping me when responding. Thanks. -(t) Josve05a  (c) 11:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * pinging a bit late! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Luckily I was stalking this page a bit, so I saw it when you undeleted it. :) (t) Josve05a  (c) 08:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Ashish Basnet
genuineness of person -Readoffon (talk) 10:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do, article is not deleted (yet). "Genuineness" is not a criterion for inclusion on Wikipedia. See Notability (people) for further information. Also, the article isn't deleted, and if it was, we couldn't restore it if it were deleted as a result of a deletion discussion. As such, you can still participate in the discussion at Articles for deletion/Ashish Basnet. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:22, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Neha Rathore
Reasoning: There are no e-news articles available for the time frame of 2004-2009 as the local and national daily newspaper did not had this facility at that time. Otherwise, the page's authenticity can be checked through Indian Amateur boxing Federation. -Smackyneha (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "Authenticity" is not a criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia. In this case see WP:NBOX for inclusion criteria.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Neha Rathore, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * This editor has already contacted me about this deleted article. My advice was to go to deletion review if they could provide reliable secondary references.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Sapna Book House
OTRS permission received for all text on. 2016030310007621 - Kharkiv07  ( T ) 12:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. You will have to respond to that ORTS ticket that we will absolutely not restore that content regardless of their permission. It wasn;t deleted just for copyright violation. The text is so promotional in tone that it would never be acceptable in the main article space. They need to be told clearly and unequivocally that Wikipedia is not to be used for promotional or publicity purposes, ever. If they want to try again from scratch, they may do so, but not in main article space. Because they clearly have a conflict of interest regarding themselves, the only realistic venue for them to submit an article is at Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

The Lead Horse
I created this to help my friends and I study for our history test. -Loganslowik (talk) 15:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place for funny stories which are not true. See Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. JohnCD (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:V-Excel Educational Trust
''I, Prak nat, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Prak nat (talk) 14:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:The Addictocarb Diet
''I, Larry276, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Larry276 (talk) 22:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have deleted a slab of text copied from a web site, do not put it back. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Quranic Botanic Garden
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Malrose68 (talk) 06:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 1= Quranic Botanic Garden 2= The page was deleted due to no activity or editing over six months. I would now like to edit the page and resubmit for the approval. Malrose68 (talk) 06:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Ashok R kondke
Aashok r kondke (talk) 07:50, 24 April 2016‎ (UTC)
 * ❌ - the deleted sandbox page contained nothing but your name. I have removed your CV from this page, which is not the place to post it; nor is your user page, which I have tagged for deletion, with an explanation on your talk page.
 * Writing about oneself on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged - see Autobiography. If, after reading that, you still want to write about yourself, you should read WP:Your first article and then use WP:Articles for creation to guide you through the process of making a draft. If it is to be accepted, it will need to cite references showing references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," to show how you meet the WP:Notability standard of WP:CREATIVE. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Onsen UI (Mobile application framework)
''I, 60.236.108.32, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 60.236.108.32 (talk) 23:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

लीमा धर
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -संकल्पप्रभा (talk) 12:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Indian Sahitya Akademi, the main literary organization run by the Government Of India, has included biography of Leema Dhar, one of the youngest bi-lingual Indian authors in Hindi & English, in its WHO'S WHO OF INDIAN WRITERS, March 2015 edition. Wikipedia needs to keep this page intact.
 * ❌ The page was not in English and neither was its title, and so not suitable for the English Wikipedia. Also note that blogspot and wordpress are not counted as reliable sources here. I suggest that you start again at Draft:Leema Dhar and write in English. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

KylieAphroditeLogo-K.png
The file was moved to commons and deleted from EN:WP 23 June 2012. This and several other files have been deleted because of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kylie Minogue text logos but this file is used on EN:WP as the portal image so I noticed the missing file flagged on several pages. Could it be checked if it would be allowable to be refunded here under the local rules? Obviously this is just a speculative request as I don't know what the image was exactly or the license details to determine if this is an allowable request. Cheers -KylieTastic (talk) 12:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done They must have a wrong idea if they think this has a copyright in Australia! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Policy Sciences (Journal)


This is rather hasty. This page is not advertizing but contains information on past editors and award winners (if you would let me finish it!). Nor does it contain copyrighted information - you have a lot of nerve asserting this is the case when it is not.-Mi9cal (talk) 17:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Mi9cal does not seem to understand copyright, wiki editing in general and has a likely COI on this page (user name similar to Journal editor name). Oh and they also just called the deleting admin a N*ZI on the article talk page. This will be interesting. Definitely notable page, but not as created or edited by this bumbling user. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * As above title has been salted, article was recreated as Policy Sciences (journal) instead--I've tagged it as spam. -- Finngall   talk  19:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Coffmx/sandbox
''I, Coffmx, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Coffmx (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Stefan Kiesbye Profile Photo.jpg
File permission has been verified on OTRS 2016040710014739. Licensed CC-BY-SA 3.0/GFDL. Please restore for move to Wikimedia Commons. -(t) Josve05a  (c) 22:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done Huon (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brody Chaze
2602:306:8083:87C0:D494:A2CD:1FD3:344 (talk) 22:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Moved to Draft:Brody Chaze. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Alfred stone photo.jpg
Per OTRS Ticket#2016041110023257, the permission was already sent at April 11, and is valid (but Explicit deleted the file regadress the uploader's Talk page has OTRS pending). Please restore to be transferred to Commons. -Amitie 10g (talk) 02:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The permission is not valid. I would want more than a permission from some random gmail account before restoring. The declaration of consent was sent by the uploader, but the deleted file page says that "Suzanne Stone Johnson" (someone else) gave permission for the image, which would mean that the uploader is not the photographer who holds the copyright.
 * There may not be a problem, though, since the OTRS message says it's a photo of Alfred E. Stone who died in 1908, so the photo is at least 70 years old (and it would be unlikely that the photographer is still alive to give permission). Therefore it may be public domain, but I am not sure (there may be a dependency on whether the photo was previously published). If we can get that point clarified, it should be no problem to restore. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Update: the term of copyright is "life of the author plus 70 years." If the photographer has been deceased for at least 70 years, then the photo would be public domain. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:N.R. Kleinfeld
''I, TundraGreen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' TundraGreen (talk) 01:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

It was deleted because I was taking too long to finish it. I would like to complete it now. -TundraGreen (talk) 01:54, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Departure (2015 film)
''I, Pigreppi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Pigreppi (talk) 10:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Savile Club Bar, Maja Photo, Mar 2016.JPEG
Permission received; 2016041610007962. Licensed under cc-by-sa-3.0/GFDL. Please restore pending move to Commons. -(t) Josve05a  (c) 10:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please add correct template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Creating Draft:WYNIT Distribution
Gallard9968 (talk) 14:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gopal Babu Goswami
''I, Tiwari.hem, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Tiwari.hem (talk) 14:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Gopal Babu Goswami. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:PEACOCK. JohnCD (talk) 15:55, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

File:IFM Laoag.jpg
The file information page was deleted because there was a file information page without a file, and now there is a file without a file information page. Please undelete the file information page again. -Stefan2 (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 17:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Centre of Evidence-Based Practice
Permission received for text from http://www.rodekruis.be/en/*. If the only reason for deletion was the copyright, please restore. 2016041210009271 - Kharkiv07  ( T ) 16:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ - I have restored it to Draft:Centre of Evidence-Based Practice because, as usual, just copying an organization's own stuff does not make a satisfactory encyclopedia article, and in mainspace this would be liable to deletion. In particular, it needs references showing significant coverage about the centre in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, to establish Notability. I will put some advice on the author's talk page.
 * Kharkiv07: I put a ConfirmationOTRS template on the draft talk page, though the system muttered about my not being supposed to. Would you check that it's right? In particular, I don't know if it needs the "licence" parameter. JohnCD (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Roland B. Gittelsohn
''I, Teaperson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Please undelete - I do want to get back to this some time and it was not submitted and rejected. Teaperson (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note particularly the need for references. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Suffolk Polo Club
Notability of sports club established by reference to long history and by numerous references in the encyclopaedia "Polo in Britain" by Horace Laffaye, the most authoritative academic reference on the sport. Not all important content is online! Also, numerous other smaller and younger sports clubs pass the notability standard. -Burgundywine (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "Long history"? For a club formed in 2006? There is no requirement for references to be online, but you must still cite them, and if it's mentioned only in that one book, the club still wouldn't qualify under WP:CORP, which requires multiple sources that provide significant coverage, not just a profile in a niche-topic encyclopedia whose purpose is to describe everything about Polo in Britain, even clubs that are not notable by Wikipedia standards.
 * This request is . The proper procedure is to inquire whether the deleting admin would be willing to restore it. We can't restore articles by request on this page, when the article was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD. Randykitty may be willing to restore it to draft space for you to improve. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Sire.png
Now that it's PD, I must upload possibly bigger size to Commons. -George Ho (talk) 06:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Why? It seems big enough for something so simple. And why report it here? It isn't deleted, so there's nothing to undelete. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Wait, isn't there a larger revision? If not, then my apologies. --George Ho (talk) 06:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The deleted version isn't any larger; it just has an opaque white background. —Cryptic 06:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I restored it anyway. It's just 3 pixels larger and sort of fuzzy, hardly worth the effort to restore. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Images for cleanup without reasons
This is a maintenance category which is populated by cleanup image. Maintenance categories which are populated by templates should normally not be deleted even if they occasionally are empty. -Stefan2 (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft: Tales of Iona
151.230.101.72 (talk) 12:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Draft:Tales of Iona Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Chase Whale
''I, Kacey3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Still researching to find valid significance of person -Kacey3 (talk) 14:18, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-2R, a Era that is no more.
Unfairly tagged for removal, along with Honda CBR250, Suzuki GSX-R250, Kawasaki Ninja ZX-2R(Faired), Kawasaki Balius(Naked), Yamaha FZR250(Faired), Yamaha FZX250(Naked) pages Nominated by --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC). 250cc Race bikes at a time in history, something that is no longer made, but used around the world on and off the racetrack. Only see that it was taken down as I was looking up information https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yamaha_FZR250 "Better readers should google this information in a forum post, or personal we page and caveat emptor." Sites mentioned that had data no longer exist/flaky at best, Wikipedia does. Even made an account just to post this. -Wobblysauce (talk) 20:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:05, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gilles Bendenoun
''I, Poganodon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Poganodon (talk) 21:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It is now at Draft:Gilles Bendenoun You will ahve to find sources that are not press releases and cut the marketing style of writing to make it a more informative formal style. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

The Salsa Center
21:39, 28 February 2014 Smalljim (talk | contribs) deleted page The Salsa Center (A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject).
 * The Salsa Center · ( logs |  links | watch ) · [ revisions ]

What little I know about The Salsa Center Company is that for a brief time in the mid-90's it offered a very well curated catalog of rare post-Revolution Cuban music, licensed from Egrem. To this day, much of the music they made available is difficult, even impossible to find in any format other than their CD's (which are long out of print). For this reason alone I think The Salsa Center Company made an important contribution to the preservation and dissemination of a historically significant period in Cuban music when the music was not heard in the United States and presumably other western European nations. I'm curious to learn more about the outfit. I'm most especially hoping to find a catalog of their releases. There is so little else that I've found, I don't know that I could contribute appreciably to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.226.191.123 (talk) 05:50, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ - that company sounds an interesting subject, if sources could be found, but the deleted article was not about it; it was about a "locally owned Dance Studio" in Lexington, Kentucky, started in 2011. JohnCD (talk) 08:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

International Science Programme
''I, Ernstvgr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ernstvgr (talk) 08:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roulette Intermedium (2)
''I, LorrSG, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' LorrSG (talk) 19:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This was merged and then I moved it to Draft:Roulette Intermedium. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Faye Reineberg Holt
BlueSkyCountry (talk) 19:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Megaventory
''I, Dathanasiadis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dathanasiadis (talk) 11:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * This was restored last year, but no one did anything at all to improve the page. What do you intend doing this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * There is some additional content and further authority sources referencing the company which will be included shortly after restoration for the community to approve. Dathanasiadis (talk) 19:31, 27 April (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have moved it to Draft:Megaventory Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

File:AMAA Statuette.jpg
This image was nominated for deletion on a baseless claim of unclear copyright information. The nominator's reason for nominating the image was that "I" said that "Africa Film Academy owns the copyright" and not me. Meanwhile what I said in the link he provided was that I couldn't give the image a free licence, since it is a derivative work. In other words, Africa Film Academy owns the copyright to the statuette, whereas I only own the copyright to the image. This is what the user misinterpreted to mean that I didn't own the image. I initially thought any admin deleting the image would investigate properly before deleting, that was why I just ignored the user's deletion request. Since no one commented, I was thinking the discussion would be closed as no consensus, but the closing admin says otherwise. I already contacted the admin. Thanks.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 16:15, 27 April 2016 (UTC) -Jamie Tubers (talk) 16:15, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I am treating this as a soft delete, as not even the nominator asked to delete this, and the file use used under fair use anyway, so who owns the copyright is less relevant. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:David Heilman
''I, Dubfiend, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dubfiend (talk) 17:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

The page seemed a little light on sources so I temporarily abandoned it, but some new interviews have emerged and I'd like to complete and submit at this point. Dubfiend —Preceding undated comment added 17:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Waldon Approach
''I, Waltersolomon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Waltersolomon (talk) 20:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Covert United States foreign regime change actions
Useful article, deletion clearly mischievous -Bougatsa42 (talk) 01:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * In this case there was a debate Articles for deletion/Covert United States foreign regime change actions (2nd nomination) which voted to turn this to a redirect. This is clearly controversial, as there has been an edit war over the redirect.  So I suggest that you go to WP:DRV and start a new proposal to have this as an article.  There is nothing for us to do here as the old stuff is still there in the history, eg https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Covert_United_States_foreign_regime_change_actions&oldid=697196034 Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Shiva Thejus
There have been recent developments in the news that make this article more prominent than ever. I am requesting the article be undeleted so that I might have the chance to edit in these new resources. -Wordsareswords (talk) 05:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Shiva Thejus, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, since you believe that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 08:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Summer Moore
Hollywoodresources (talk) 06:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The draft has not been deleted. I have added an "Unsubmitted draft" template to the top, which has a "Submit" button you can click to send it for review when it is ready. It could do with better referencing: the first two references do not work for me (I will see whether I can fix them), and IMDb and interviews do not count much towards establishing Notability, which looks for "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." (IMDb is not considered reliable because user-edited). There are additional numbers in square brackets here and there in your text, which look as though there have been more references in some earlier version. I suggest you add more, if you can, before submitting it for review, because at present it does not seem to me to show notability to the standard required by WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:CREATIVE.


 * To avoid confusion, I have deleted the earlier version Draft:Summer moore. JohnCD (talk) 08:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Greg Leasure
''I, BMXfoLife, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' BMXfoLife (talk) 14:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Greg Leasure. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Contraction theorem
''I, R.e.b., request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' r.e.b. (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Kurt Zdesar
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -UserNameTakenWasTaken (talk) 21:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC) It was deleted stating advertising. Firstly, Kurt has inspired many people in his career especially as he worked his way up from the bottom. He knows what it means to graft and wasnt just handed a pile of money and told go open a business. Sitting with Kurt for just 10 minutes you learn so much about the restaurant business and notably for wikipedia he has launched restaurants we all know. He created concepts and delivered what are now household names. I think its unfair to say its advertising, when it was deleted without even reading his backstory to see how much of an inspiration he is and in times when we all need people we can look up to. People who are successful because they worked their way up, not because it was handed to them.

deleting the page is not just as people love to get behind someone with real values (read about his food beliefs please) and actual ability and have a global name and track record of delivery. This might be my first submission but i am disappointed that it was summarily executed in such a style.
 * Perhaps it could be restored to a draft so that the style issues can be fixed, as there is a claim of importance in the page. But I am also concerned that it is an infringement of a section on this page: http://content.yudu.com/Library/A2fk2j/PremierHospitalityIs/resources/68.htm. Are there any more independent references available to demonstrate the notability of the topic? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Ondra
Article about tesla ondra was deleted because of not enough sources (?). There should be another source at http://hackaday.com/2014/12/15/home-computers-behind-the-iron-curtain/ and ... "TESLA Ondra" stub now actually exists so it would be good to restore the article. -109.81.210.97 (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Tesla Ondra this was an old AFC page, hopefully it is what you want. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)