Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 236

Draft:Vic Fischer
Same rationale as with the request for Albert Adams. Once again, what sort of massive lack of common sense and human judgement is being employed here that a signer of a state constitution and state senator is an unsuitable topic for an encyclopedia which reflects what's notable? This sort of bizarro attitude is only helped along by the fact that we have an article on his father, an anachronistic island of information which barely acknowledges his also-notable offspring. - RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 19:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * You don't seem to understand that draft space isn't intended for indefinite hosting of material that hasn't been deemed suitable for publication in main space. If six months go by without any improvements or submission, the draft gets deleted. That policy was put into place a couple (or more) years ago. Nobody should be surprised that it's being enforced.


 * I note you have been listing articles here without actually making a request. Do you, or do you not, intend to work on them, or submit them for review? If not, then you have offered no reason to restore them. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Why are you giving me the same bullshit boilerplate response as the other editor over a point which I've addressed multiple times already? Perhaps you may view pieces of process as islands unto themselves, but I don't see where I'm obligated to follow along.  "You don't seem to understand that draft space isn't intended for indefinite hosting of material that hasn't been deemed suitable for publication in main space"?  Perhaps you need to pay better attention to what's actually in article space.  The history of one article,, provides a real good example of that.  I have multiple sources pertaining to Reck in my collection, but I object to the idea that another editor dumped subpar, perfunctory content into article space just to claim creation credit, all the while expecting someone else to come along and do all the real work.  There's a reason why I'm so fond of analogies to Night Shift: where did people get the idea that I came here to play Henry Winkler to someone else's Michael Keaton?  If you didn't peruse the diff I provided in the other request, RHaworth asked me to move these projects offline, which I am in the process of doing right now.  Your question to me appears to imply that if I came here, it was to grovel for your permission to improve the encyclopedia.  I'm not a new user and resent being treated as such. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  01:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done It should not have been deleted, as it was not in AFC. But anyway hopefully this will become an article soon. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Association of Village Council Presidents
Same as with the other two requests, except that this was an actual AFC submission and not something I initiated. Regardless, if you peruse the talk pages of each, you will see that they were assessed as Mid-Importance for a WikiProject. As I mention in the previous rationale, if you don't value an editor's good-faith efforts to identify these as topics suitable for an encyclopedia which reflects notable topics, then you should just say so directly. Rather, AFC has chosen to engage in mindless script editing and mindlessly carrying out process and trying to hide behind such editing in lieu of actually exercising any clear judgment. If they don't wish to help out in my efforts to expand our coverage of notable topics, that's fine, but I question the wisdom of attacking these efforts and making another editor start all over again from scratch. As this pattern of behavior from AFC participants has been obvious for quite some time, I will be happy to work on these on my own and bring them back when they're ready. - RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 20:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * G13s, provided they're being worked on, are restored on request here, RadioKAOS. They only get deleted if a long while (6 mo.) passes from the last edit. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 00:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * As I already mentioned, in among all the recent bullshit robo-messages on my talk page was a request from an admin to move my projects offline and work on them there, which is the intent of the requests on this page. Because I wasn't gaming the system like other editors and showing up every so often to make a null edit to keep it from being deleted, now it appears that you're questioning that intent.  Based on the attitude I've experienced on this page so far, it's probably quite pointless of me to ask just exactly what benefit is to be gained by deleting this and making another editor start all over again from scratch, aside from the plainly obvious, previously-mentioned aspect of allowing very few editors to make content decisions on behalf of everyone else. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  01:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not questioning your intent with this one, I'm just clarifying that G13s are generally restored on request here if there's evidence they are or have been worked on. I questioned your placement of the last one, but never your intent. Please do not put words I never implied or intended into my mouth. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 03:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The only thing we really need here, is some sort of confirmation that these would be worked on in the future. If you want us to restore these to your userspace (which would put them at far less risk of deletion) then that's fine. Typically though, the draftspace is strongly associated with AfC and stale drafts seem to be relatively fair game for deletion. I know that I've created drafts that ended up going stale and getting deleted despite not being tagged as AfC articles and I have no problem with that personally, as I don't particularly like stale drafts hanging around with no one editing. (For me it's that a userspace article has one specific person tied to it whereas a draft can be far more easily abandoned since there's usually no one person monitoring the page, if you were curious as to my viewpoint on draft articles.) If you want to argue that not all drafts are AfC, this is the wrong forum for this and you need to take this up at WP:SPEEDY, if you haven't already. Offhand I'd like to ask that you use less profanity and keep a calmer head there, as getting worked up and using curse words isn't really going to be all that conducive to discussion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. For this sort of thing, you just have to ask, there is no need to get distressed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Albert P. Adams
There's more to this than asking to undelete a draft. What was the purpose of enabling Draft-Class for numerous WikiProjects when we have a single WP, in this case AFC, disingenuously ignoring or otherwise exercising veto power over non-AFC editing made within draftspace? This draft was deleted under G13, but was never intended to be an AFC submission. Rather, a single AFC participant took it upon himself to hijack it, with zero regard for the fact that a person who served in a state legislature for twenty years is a notable topic which deserves coverage in an encyclopedia which reflects notable topics, never mind the fact that he belonged to an ethnic group which is badly underrepresented on the encyclopedia (oh, but it's okay to invoke WP:BIAS whenever it suits your purposes?). From what I've seen, caving in to COI contributors who are here to push non-notable promotional spam is a much higher priority to these editors than are inherently notable topics such as this. Additionally, Db-g13 makes reference to "the Articles for Creation namespace", which doesn't explicitly mention draftspace, while WP:G13 states that G13 applies to content "that are using the project's AFC submission template." Once again, I'm not submitting anything I'm working on through AFC, but they're choosing to hijack it nonetheless, with zero intent on helping me to expand our coverage of notable topics. Going back to what I said in the first place, if draftspace is intended to be the private plaything for one particular WikiProject, then you need to disable Draft-Class for the other WPs and hide its content from new page patrollers such as myself. I'm bypassing the G13 grovel board in this case because the G13 template forces boilerplate language on me which makes me out to be a new user begging for something because I don't understand how Wikipedia works, which I object to, plus the aforementioned fact that I never submitted anything through AFC. - RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 19:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If it was never intended as an AfC submission, then why did you put it in draft space instead of a user sandbox or directly into mainspace if the sourcing was there? Your argument seems self-defeating here. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Wrong question to ask. First of all, the editor who deleted this particular draft with no discussion or warning whatsoever has been on a bent for the better part of the past year to mass-delete content while giving no clear idea as to why such content is "unsuitable", and has extended this crusade as of late to userspaces.  The last I read, the whole mess is likely to wind up at Arbcom, and all to fix something which really wasn't broken in the first place.  If you're participating in a highly specialized venue such as this, then you can't honestly expect me to believe that you're oblivious to that.  That one editor has been directly or indirectly responsible for a staggering number of RFCs in recent months.  I haven't tracked down the exact comment, but one editor's assessment that this is ultimately a ploy to allow a select group of editors the ability to decide what is and isn't notable on behalf of the rest of the community was right on the money.  Secondly, instead of talking down to other editors by repeatedly beating them over the head with condescending boilerplate language such as "using Wikipedia as a free web host", why don't you actually pay attention to what happens in draftspace?  Right now, as we speak, there are editors who have created placeholders in draftspace, who then show up every few weeks or months to make a null edit to keep the draft from being deleted.  If you engage in AFC strictly to mindlessly carry out process, then you won't be aware of this activity because there's no backlog to clear out.  Because I have chosen not to play silly games such as that, my contributions are being judged differently from those other contributions, which in and of itself is a silly game.  It's not leading us towards expanding our coverage of notable topics, that's for damn sure. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  22:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * RadioKAOS, you seem to think that a draft article is somehow different from an article for creation, but it isn't. Draft articles are articles for creation, and if you were using draft space for some other purpose then yo were misusing it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I've already pointed out that this is being stressed more through implication more than anything else, so I shouldn't have to repeat myself simply because you breezed past that point. However, if you need that to be made any clearer, .  Here we have an AFC participant who acknowledges that I'm not doing anything wrong *except in his opinion*, and offering the impression that this opinion is rooted in the fact that I'm working on my own and not submitting these through AFC and therefore not providing those editors with fodder.  If you bother to peruse my talk page beyond that one message and the page which RHaworth left in my userspace, you can see that he has taken it upon himself to make me "responsible" for drafts where my only contributions were minor maintenance-related edits.  You contend that draftspace exists solely to support AFC, while at the same time completely avoiding the question of why Draft-Class was enabled for other WPs.  Now, I get it that Justin is fond of using AWB to make frivolous edits by the untold thousands because he's engaged in some sort of editing competition, but I fail to see what that has to do with building an encyclopedia.  OTOH, please feel free to point out anything which I have placed in my userspace or in draftspace which has nothing to do with building an encyclopedia, so I can correct that.  Otherwise, all I'm seeing here are other editors sitting around expecting me to do all the work for them so that they have something to pass judgment on, all the while not lifting a finger to help. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  22:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Ricky81682 certainly deleted this out of process and deserved a WP:Trout. I think others have complained about this before, but this board is not for this sort of argument. The person in the article looks to be in a class suitable for article, but we need to have some references to prove the content, then it can go to mainspace. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Hipstergrrl/sandbox/Tabernacle of Hedonism
''I, Hipstergrrl, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Hipstergrrl (talk) 16:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Noor Hisham Mohd Ghouth
I need to edit my company CEO Profile. At first i got block because im new to wikipedia. i dont know how to edit. Now i already learn how to create. please dont delete it. Thank you -Hazaly (talk) 07:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The old version is not worth restoring as the new writings are much bigger. However there are no references, even if there is a claim of importance. If you like this can be turned into a draft rather than speedy deleted. At the moment the page looks too much like a CV, and is too promotional, with no references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Association of Scientists, Developers and Faculties
I have read the comments for deleting the page that the website is not available and presumed that the organisation is not functioning anymore. Also, I read that the links are dead. I found that the organisation has redirected and there was no one to update that information or rewrite the contents. -Dhurvignesh83 (talk) 21:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Both of this page's AfDs closed as delete. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 03:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * This had already been taken to deletion review with the deletion endorsed. -- KTC (talk) 11:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Moscow Pass
''I, Евгений Рыбников, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Евгений Рыбников (talk) 09:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Matthias Kirste
I would like to restore the page, to add more sources and improve upon it. It was deleted today after a PROD (that I saw too late), but there had been a PROD-discussion in the past where it had been decided to keep it. I intend to improve the page. Thank you.Mike300578 (talk) 10:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Harvey & Clarke
Request copy to my User space of article and its Talk page, to further develop for restoration to mainspace. It was deleted by Articles for deletion/Harvey & Clarke but is salvageable. I thought I requested this already but don't have it, or at least not a full version with edit history. - do ncr  am  17:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

‎File:I will remember you 1999 sarah mclachlan live.jpg
The image was used at I Will Remember You (Sarah McLachlan song) and discussed at Non-free content review/Archive 34. However, now that I think about it, I really think that consensus for this image no longer flies now that NFCR is deprecated. I did request a speedy deletion on this image because the other cover art is currently used there. Now I want this image undeleted and then, per WP:IAR, reinsert it as the extra image. Therefore, I can put both images up for discussion at FFD. -George Ho (talk) 17:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * U2713.svg Already done by RHaworth. --George Ho (talk) 01:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Ayesha Nazir Jatt
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Refaahmed (talk) 22:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. As Facebook is normally a link we avoid and we never cite social media if we can help it, your links don't help your case much. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 05:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

national backward krishi vidyapeeth solapur in india
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Annarao1111 (talk) 08:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 05:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Donald C. Farber
Taffylassegues (talk) 16:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note please do not place text copied from other pages on it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Williamsburg Independent Film Festival 2
Williamsburg Independent Film Festival, inc. is a not for profit. It was founded in 2009 and launched its first program in November of 2010. Willfilm123 (talk) 09:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

User:FrB.TG
Requesting for "undeletion" -FrB.TG (talk) 17:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I have rolled back to a version that looks like a userpage, but you are free to change it. All revisions are restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Barry
I have added the References -Suavi~enwiki (talk) 13:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The page was not deleted. We need independent references to show notability though if you want to avoid an AFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

UN-DELETION: Senteurs d'Orient
Karihoshi (talk) 00:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * . As the reviewer said, this needs to be reworked from scratch. As it is, it is far too promotional to be accepted as a Wikipedia article. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Parting gift
Parting gift was deleted. I asked to give me a possibility to continue to work on it. At these times there were varuous ideas about new articles, incubator, draft. So instead of userfing it was "incubated" and "drafted", and finally an admin decided to delete it. And now the deleting admin refused to userfy it on a whim without even asking for my explanations. I am not asking to userfy my granddad bio. This is an encyclopedic topic, for Gods' sake despite the ridiculous opinion at the Afd "a few trivial anecdotes". How on Earth, eg Japanese gift-giving traditions is an "anecdote", is only in the brain of smartass know-it alls. I have created 4,000+ articles, including various weird things, such as Turkey bowling, and it is the first time I am seeing such rudeness. - üser:Altenmann >t 00:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC) -- üser:Altenmann >t 00:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I did not "refuse to userfy it on a whim": I explained my reasons for doubting that restoring the page would be helpful, and waited to see what response, if any, Altenmann would make. It is true that I didn't explicitly ask for Altenmann's reasons, but I thought that explaining my thoughts on the matter would allow him to give his reasons if he wished to. may perhaps like to think about his remark about "rudeness" coming in the immediate sentence following his referring to people he disagrees with as "smartass know-it alls". Anyway, I have restored the page now. It will be interesting to see what Altenmann makes of it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Which means you refused on a whim. I asked you. Where is your freaking WP:AGF? Feels good to rub other's noses onto the table, isn't it? - üser:Altenmann >t 05:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Conclusion: JamesBWatson did restore the page, but Altenmann asked for deletion again . Altenmann is free to request undelete again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * yes, i copied it to my computer to avoid this humiliation again and again. it was written ages ago when requests for refs was not so strict. i will restore it when it will be rock-solid. but unfortunately i dont have much time to do research because the topic is indeed kinda fringe. - üser:Altenmann >t 04:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Request Marcus Shirock for undeletion / Relist his page
This is Kari Goldburg from BNWpr and I represent Marcus Shirock as his PR Agent. His Wiki page should have never been deleted and was a personal attack against him. Marcus has starred in several films including Hercules Reborn and is currently on National Television every Saturday on Championship Wrestling from Hollywood.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0794269/ http://www.imdb.com/video/user/vi206285849 https://www.facebook.com/marcusshirock1

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marcus_Shirock&action=history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.32.85 (talk) 05:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. We do not consider IMDb an acceptable source, and we do not link to (let alone cite) Facebook if we can help it. Also, per the Terms of Use and (in some jurisdictions) laws against covert advertising you are obligated to disclose your clients publicly. Note that Wikipedia runs off of a consensus model for decision-making; that model was followed in this instance thru AfD and any deletion as a result of that should not be taken as a personal attack or indictment of Shirock's character in any way, shape, or form. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 06:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Rammya Singh
The page has been created on the basis of news circulating in the newspapers and online media websites. There has been a continuous news about the model in the newspapers and Television and hence qualifies to be known as a public figure. I hope this link remains on the wikipedia as a source of information. -Aayat1993 (talk) 22:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Was deleted at AfD, and other problems too. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  03:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

John Machado
I noticed that the page was deleted due to lack of citations. There are ample articles available online for this martial arts master, and I can easily bring them into the Wiki article to aid in it's relevancy to the martial arts and media world. Honestly, I'm still not sure if I'm in the right place for this request, so apologies if this is not correct the forum. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kershawdraw (talk • contribs) 00:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/John Machado, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like there was some concern that the article was confusing multiple people with the same name, so you would need to be able to ensure that the sourcing is all for the same person. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

James DeVone, Sr.
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -50jmd (talk) 17:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC) James M. DeVone, Sr., was a first time Running Back, on the 1963 North Carolina Central(NCCU), Durham, NC Football Team, as a Sophomore. He weighed only 165 pounds, and was injured that year, causing him not to play in the 1963 CIAA Championship Football Game. However, DeVone returned to play, in 1965, his Senior year and ran the winning touchdown, from the 5 yard line, against A&T University, Greensboro, NC, in the rival "Thanksgiving Day Classic". In 1966, he was invited to the Las Angeles Rams Pro Football Team, but choose to go to the "Charleston, WV 'Rockets", a Pro Football Team owned by John Rockefeller, IV. Coy Bacon, future "LA Rams Fearsome-Foursome Lineman" and Clyde Williams, future St. Louis Cardinals were, also, members of that team.
 * 50jmd, the article was deleted because it lacked reliable sources (WP:BLPPROD). If you can provide a reliable source we can restore it, although you would still need to continue to provide enough sourcing to establish overall notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Harrington Saints
''I, Rom68, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rom68 (talk) 20:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Viewforth Church
''I, Chemboro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Chemboro (talk) 18:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It can be now found at Draft:Viewforth Church. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Qore (programming language)
Over the past couple of years, development has significantly picked up, Qore is included in several UNIX/Linux distributions (OpenSUSE, FreeBSD, Arch Linux, and others), and we have a new garbage collection algorithm (https://github.com/qorelanguage/qore/wiki/Prompt-Collection) that is potentially a significant innovation in programming language development, as it allows RAII in a multithreaded programming language with automatic memory management. Also a book was published about Qore. Nichols david (talk) 17:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC) -Nichols david (talk) 17:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Sandhya Mendonca
''I, SubhalakshmiRoy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SubhalakshmiRoy (talk) 11:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Because I want to edit it again and make it fit for publishing -SubhalakshmiRoy (talk) 11:51, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Look in the history to see what was there before your recreation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Persona2isbox.JPG
I must reinsert it in Persona 2: Innocent Sin. -George Ho (talk) 09:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please use it Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Myall1.jpg
Previously used in My All. Should replace the existing PNG image done by sockpuppet. -George Ho (talk) 04:33, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please use it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Kent Tattoo
No reasoning given. -Kenttattoo (talk) 14:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * . Autobiographies are strongly discouraged, and furthermore, this is the English Wikipedia. There is no value to this project in restoring a non-English article. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Les Brown (actor)
''I, Lesbrown99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lesbrown99 (talk) 02:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm a little leery about this. I need to ask: are you aware that Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself? I'm concerned that your userpage is basically one big mass of links to your various websites and things you've done. Userpages should only contain information about yourself as it pertains to Wikipedia. It should not be used as a way to get people to visit your websites or view various off-Wikipedia information about yourself. Some basic info is fine, but your page just seems a bit too promotional. The AfC article is also a bit promotional as well. Not terribly so, but it would require a basic re-write because there are some things that are a bit problematic when you consider that you're writing your own autobiography. Adding in info like page hits and views can be seen as indiscriminate or promotional, especially given your userpage and that you link to your acting demo in your external links section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I also don't really see where you would ultimately pass notability guidelines. You don't seem to have received any independent coverage in reliable sources, not enough to where you'd pass notability guidelines, and I also don't see where you even have an IMDb page. This last part doesn't mean that someone can't be notable, but it is usually fairly telling when IMDb doesn't automatically catalog someone's acting roles. This usually means that the roles are either minor walk on roles or uncredited ones, neither of which give notability except in very rare situations. You wrote that you were in an award winning commercial, however you were not the recipient of the commercial and commercials rarely give notability on Wikipedia because there are so many of them - to give notability you'd have to establish where the commercial is independently noteworthy. In other words, I don't really think that restoring the article would be all that beneficial since there's little to no chance of this passing NACTOR at this point in time and you've been working on this since 2012 and it's already been restored twice. I think that we'd be giving you a bit of false hope at this point if we restore this a third time, so X mark.svg Not done. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

CloudKaptan Consultancy Services Private Limited
The CloudKaptan Consultancy Services Private Limited is a growing firm and it should be in wikipedia and it is not a startup company. I request you not to delete the page. -Khushilove (talk) 07:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Khushilove: This page was up for deletion per A7 and G11. Offhand the promotional concerns appear valid since the bulk of the article is very promotional. It looks like this page had already been deleted at CloudKaptan for the same reasons. The page would need a complete and total re-write in order to pass notability guidelines, however I'm also concerned that there does not appear to have been any coverage of the company in independent and reliable sources like newspapers. All companies need to have coverage in order to assert notability per WP:NCORP and I just don't see it here, so I'm leaving the article deleted (I deleted the most current version). You can try creating this at WP:AfC, but it must be non-promotional, it must be sourced with independent WP:RS, and you must also disclose any potential conflict of interest in this situation, since the article layout/tone gives off the impression that you're likely editing with a conflict of interest. I do sympathize with the potential COI since I know that it's not easy (from my own experiences with editing with a small amount of COI), but this does need to be disclosed and you do need to be careful with tone and sourcing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

KODE5
retrieving expired PROD -Prisencolin (talk) 06:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Prisencolin, I'm going to restore this to your userspace since it does have some issues with tone. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done You can find this at User:Prisencolin/KODE5. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Eduardus M. de Jager
''I, Specfunfan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Specfunfan (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bevern Trust (August 10)
''I, 82.69.231.105, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 82.69.231.105 (talk) 13:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:The Bevern Trust Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Black Swan Data Ltd
''I, Cadet drive, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Cadet drive (talk) 11:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Audioworks Producers Group, Inc.
''I, 72.69.60.235, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 72.69.60.235 (talk) 14:12, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:04, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Writers & Directors Worldwide
''I, Ocr69am, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ocr69am (talk) 17:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:DSoft Technology
DSoft Technology has a new editor assigned to this project to correct previous errors and resubmit revised version following Wikipedia guidelines -Jpdtech (talk) 21:04, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

New editor has been assigned to this project, committed to following Wikipedia guidelines to garner posting of revised listing for DSoft Technology per Wikipedia Guidelines -Jpdtech (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Does said editor have his own Wikipedia account, and if so, has he declared his conflict of interest? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 22:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

lala Textiles
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Daphnevern (talk) 08:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done The article deleted several times (and salted) as an article created by an editor evading their block and it stands to reason that you're likely this same person evading the block once more, so I'm declining this and blocking you as a sock. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Citizens Advice
Could the following images for the page Citizens Advice please be undeleted
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Advising_At_Citizens_Advice.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Princess_Anne_Citizens_Advice.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Vince_Cable_Citizens_Advice.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Southend_bureau.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

To explain, the person who took them is willing to release them under a suitable Creative Commons licence. However I got busy in real life and never got round to making sure the permissions were formally requested and e-mailed in. DanielJCooper (talk) 17:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, have the declarations of consent (see WP:CONSENT) been sent to OTRS? What is the ticket number? ~Amatulić (talk) 21:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * No I've not got them yet. I want the images undeleted first then I can e-mail the copyright holder and explain these are the four images that I want to use. DanielJCooper (talk) 22:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I have restored the images. You have 7 days to get the copyright holder to send WP:CONSENT letters to OTRS before they are automatically deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'll request tomorrow morning and then I had better hope they e-mail in within seven days DanielJCooper (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * E-mail was sent to copyright holder today DanielJCooper (talk) 11:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Shahram Farshadfar
Enter your reasoning here wrong spelling of the name and then click the "Save page" button below -Shahram Farshadfar (talk) 22:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are they, I suggest you read WP:Autobiography. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 22:23, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * . This was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD so it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page. Do not write about yourself on Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Make Love Not Scars
EndAcidAttack (talk) 14:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please undelete article Draft:FUJITSU GLOVIA, Inc.
Acharles3033 (talk) 15:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC) Draft:FUJITSU GLOVIA, Inc.

I made additional edits to the article yesterday, with additional citations, but neglected to remove the code. It's since been deleted. Can you undelete the article so that I may continue working on finding credible citations?

Thanks.

Angela
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Lala Textiles
{{subst:refund|1= Lala Textiles |2= i remove all advertising content and only provide informational details not any advertising and sorry for my mistakes my humble request please undelete thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.47.170.26 (talk) 05:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * {{not done}} Please consult with User:Jimfbleak who deleted the page, as perhaps this IP should be treated the same as the other users. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Zip2
G13 user request, plan to improve with archived sources and publish -Appable (talk) 19:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Appable (talk) 17:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Bonnie_Bucqueroux
''I, CandaceID, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' CandaceID 20:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Kent Tattoo (2)
I do not feel to write articles for sale, I just write a few words about the biography and a piece of one's journey -Ateng25 (talk) 12:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Even if it weren't a biography written by or at the behest of the subject, it was pointed out last time that the page wasn't in English. The English Wikipedia does not accept articles not written in English. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * All versions after the first deletion actually were in English. We still don't restore pages marked "A7" or "G11" here, though, like the huge box above the edit window told you. You're going to have to either convince one of the administrators who deleted it - that would be User talk:RHaworth, User talk:Lectonar, or User talk:Huon - or go through the more formal process at Deletion review.  I don't like your chances either way. —Cryptic 20:59, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Valley Center History Museum
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -EF Brown (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC) I am President of the Valley Center History Museum and would like to see it continue on Wikipedia. As you know, many students use your site for research and need to have access to our Museum files and links. Labeled "Best Little Museum in San Diego" by the San Diego Union, it is run by volunteers and has over 30,000 visitors a year. We display thousands of artifacts showing the history of our Western and Native American heritage. The reason for the deletion is fueled by a personality conflict by a person and one of our volunteer board of directors.
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page has been turned into a redirect; the history remains at the redirect and because of that there is nothing to undelete. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


 * It looks like this was "deleted" at AfD, where the consensus was to redirect the article to Valley Center, California after merging some of the content. It looks like the redirect was done, but not the merge itself. I'll go and add in some content from the article. However, since this went through a deletion discussion you would have to bring any potential restoration up with the admin that closed the discussion, . Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Khalifa (album)
Philg88 accidentally moved the page Khalifa (mixtape) when he didn't realize that it has already been moved by Anthony Appleyard, causing the page Khalifa (album) to be a circular redirect; see Talk:Khalifa (album). -GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Trevor Henry (commentator)
requesting deleted draft -Prisencolin (talk) 23:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Trevor Henry (sports announcer), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The page in the afd was moved to a draft in the deletion discussion time (not permitted) but deletion discussion decided to delete this anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion was at AfD, not MfD, so I believe the deletion was erroneous. Plus I had moved the article out of article space already.
 * When discussion started at AFD it was 13 May 2016. The page was first moved on 17 May 2016, afd closed on  21 May 2016, then moved out of article space to your user space, then to draft space. I suggest that you start again, not using content from the banned user. It is interesting that the closer moved the page on the second move. So I would recommend asking User:Nakon again about this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Most of the content what written by me if I recall. Anyways there wasn't anything wrong with the content, just that it was written by a SP account. --Prisencolin (talk) 21:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

amanda van annan
Miss Annan is the niece of Koffi annan the seceretary general of the united nations. She has done tv shows and not only ones she produced. She is also destined to start in the new Avatar movie filming 2017. Miss van annan also submitted several news and press articles and has been prolific in the modelling industry. "Save page" button below -Linda1briggs (talk) 00:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Amanda Van Annan, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Note that being related to someone notable does not give notability in Wikipedia's sense. JohnCD (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)