Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 239

MyCoRe
The article was deleted because of the concern "Non-Notable software". The software is notable as "Institutional repository" and as "Free institutional repository software". MyCoRe is comparable with OPUS_(software) and other "Digital library software". The software is the underlying base of more than 60 web applications, such as "The International Treasury of Islamic Manuscripts" http://www.manuscript-treasury.net/ or "LexM" http://www.lexm.uni-hamburg.de/. The MyCoRe web application "LexM" is the source of several citations in Wikipedia. Beyond that the software development of MyCoRe is continuously ongoing: the latest release version is 2016.06 (LTS), (see german version). -Mcruser (talk) 14:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * None of what you just listed actually helps to prove notability. Wikipedia requires multiple sources that are independent of the subject, discuss the subject at some length, and which have professional editorial oversight. Merely being used in other programs does not in and of itself confer notability. We're looking for professional software reviews here. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 17:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Jeremy is correct. I have restored the article as a contested WP:PROD, but it will likely not survive a deletion in WP:AFD if no significant coverage in independent reliable sources can be found. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * , You are right. I added some references with articles, where MyCoRe is compared with other open source library software. Hope that is sufficient. ~ Mcruser (talk) 17:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Alisher Latif-Zade
''I, Ustod, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ustod (talk) 06:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:27, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Undelete
page has been deletd - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.240.126.154 (talk) 12:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do. The page has been redirected. There is no deleted history to restore. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Apparatus (Journal)
''I, Minusiplus, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Minusiplus (talk) 12:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Brian Pfeifler
My records show I attempted to deprod this. That's not what happened. I'd like to try again. -~Kvng (talk) 16:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Worksoft
Hello, we see that our company page was removed over the weekend in what we believe was a simple administrative error. Can you please reinstate it? -Gregrws (talk) 17:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment- The page was deleted 3 July, with the details below.

"A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below.

06:19, 3 July 2016 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted page Worksoft (Expired PROD, concern was: I nearly speedied too but it may not be exact enough to classify for speedy, regardless my searches still only found a few mentions, nothing actually substantial and there's still nothing convincing for independen...)

04:06, 15 February 2013 Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) deleted page Worksoft (A7: Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject" (CSDH)) Regards,   Aloha27   talk  17:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The article is now proposed for deletion at Articles for deletion/Worksoft. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

bony tripathi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -106.219.10.246 (talk) 19:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done There was nothing worthwhile there. You may start writing a new page at draft:Bony Tripathi and use references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

paola donzella
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Renzo fiore (talk) 15:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do. There is no article of that name beginning with "Paola" in the deleted history, in main space, draft space, AFC space, or the requester's deleted contributions. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It was deleted off Italian Wikipedia. We can't help you here. I don't think it will be coming back due to it:Wikipedia:Pagine da cancellare/Paola Donzella. See it:Paola Donzella for deletion log and commons:File:Paola Donzella.JPG. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Karrigan
Speedily deleted by WP:A7 without warning after a month of being in article space. has declined to restore page. I was just going to post here but I was recommended also post this in WP:DRV by another user, if anyone's wondering -Prisencolin (talk) 23:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, if it was deleted by WP:CSD then it's ineligible for restoration by request on this page. Since the deleting admin has declined to restore, WP:DRV is the way to go. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Richard C. Rudolph
OTRS agent: Permission received for content on http://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/inmemoriam/RichardC.Rudolph.htm under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL. Please restore, and if not notable or other serious issue, either tag for AfD, or draft-ify it post-undeletion. (t) Josve05a  (c) 00:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 2016070710022733 in permissions-en queue. (t) Josve05a  (c) 00:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅, article restored and talk page tagged with OTRS and license information. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Power Rangers Ninja Steel
The subject of the article has sources, as plugging in this title to a search engine reveals many sources. however, the article creators are suspected of somehow disrupting the site to the point where it is impossible to for anyone to create the article. -107.0.150.2 (talk) 08:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done We won't restore an article created by a blocked/banned user - you have to ask the deleting admin for permission. However it might be too soon for an article since it doesn't look like this has aired yet. If you can show enough coverage to establish notability and that filming has commenced, it might pass notability guidelines but until then this will remain deleted. A good first step for all of this would be to start an article at WP:AfC and then contact one of the deleting admins, since just requesting a restoration under these circumstances is unlikely to end with the page getting restored to the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Paco Ahlgren
Originally deleted in 2014 at AfD, I believe I can find reliable sources that cover the subject. Would like it userfied so I can work on it. The deleting admin is banned by ArbCom, so he can't help me. -GigglesnortHotel (talk) 17:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:GigglesnortHotel/Paco Ahlgren. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thannk you! GigglesnortHotel (talk) 14:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Universal trinity
closed DRV and just declined at to userfy the deleted article with “your confused message above indicates that it would be unlikely to produce good content”. It was not a confused message and the supposition of probable bad content apparently comes from a supposition that any changes of how clear and obvious truth about the universal trinity is presented beyond only narrating metaphoric stories mentioned in Rule of three (writing) would also too unpredictably change how people balance between the reviewable complex and the unknown, but the present religious conflicts and the dualism between democracy and islam show how objectively and clearly we should treat every basic matter associated with religion. The article also seems to contain possible extensions for article Trichotomy (philosophy) so I request userfication. -MathLine (talk) 13:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The page was speedy deleted as blatant hoax, and this was endorsed at Deletion review/Log/2016 June 27. I don't feel good about restoring hoaxes, even to userspace. MathLine may well mean well, but the tone of their messages ("clear and obvious truth about the universal trinity") indicates that they are not here to write neutral, reliably-sourced articles.  Sandstein   13:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ No need to override a WP:DRV discussion. Wikiversity may appreciate original contributions. Wikipedia is not the place for it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * In view of Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews DRV discussions with given detailed arguments for userfication of course cannot simply become overridden and I also don't see any given refund at Wikiversity at present! WP:Civility also includes that we distinguish between totally originally invented ideas and derived parallelisms only missing the last millimeter of source material, right? --MathLine (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hiring Screen
''I, Luke.william.byrne, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Luke.william.byrne (talk) 11:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:AirMyPC
''I, Wampw, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Wampw (talk) 12:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Alex P. Torn
I created the page in draft so i could work on it for a long while, clearly noted on the front page that it was a Draft Work In progress and is not to be submitted for review and should remain as draft until i was finished editing it and providing all the references. Secondly the administrator that deleted it said it sounded salesy and it was not promotional in any way and no different from other articles on public figures, i was only on my first pass free writing the article on the fly and in my writing process i first write everything out, then do several passes to correct all text so it is only factual and only once i have it edited to read correctly then i start inserting all the references and citations, which is why created it in draft in the first place and in fact that is exactly what draft is for and is well within your TOS and instruction for creating an Article in Draft, it is supposed to give the author time to write it, perfect it and ask other people to proof read it to ensure it is within wikipedia guidelines, which is exactly what my plan was and what i was doing. so for all of the reasons above I request to have the page Draft: Alex P Thorn undeleted and restored in draft or a space where i can continue to work on it and ask other people to review it as well and comment to me to fix or change certain things i may have overlooked. thank you Ronfleishman (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC) -Ronfleishman (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * As far as I can tell, the promotional tone comes from liberal use of unsubstantiated subjective terms, combined with lack of citations to reliable sources, and as such it wouldn't be acceptable in main article space. It looks like a work in progress to me, so perhaps deleting it was premature.
 * Unfortunately, since it was deleted as promotional in accordance with WP:CSD, it isn't eligible for restoration by request here. Please contact the deleting administrator at User talk:DGG and inform him that this was still a work in progress, and you would like it restored to draft space, or userfied to your user space, so that you can continue working on it. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I was writing a reply, but was called away. I have emailed you a copy of the text, since you do not have one.

I got it and just replied before i saw your reply here, thanks for sending that, ok i will try to leave a message for talk:DGG , i think i already did but got no response. thanks again 190.219.146.35 (talk) 21:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I think that another reason why the draft was considered promotional is explained by your comments on the talk page, including the statement that Mr Thorn "has been badly maligned by all parties involved. I am merely setting the record straight" and your suspicion "that bill gates and microsoft own wikipedia and are trying to suppress the truth and farther interfere in Alex's rights and business to disadvantage him in the open market."


 * No, Wikipedia is not in the pay of Bill Gates, but nor is it here to Right Great Wrongs or provide a platform for people who want to sue Microsoft to set out their case. WP:Neutral point of view is a basic policy.


 * If you are Mr Thorn, or are editing on his behalf, you have from Wikipedia's point of view a WP:Conflict of interest, and should read that page and the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.


 * More advice on your talk page tomorrow. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * no i am not writing it on his behalf, i became aware of him when i was speaking at a function in Los Angeles about making movies and he was in the News Paper at the time. I met him and we discussed everything that happened and we discussed making the movie i got a lot of background information back then, i have been verifying what he told me to ensure we could make the movie, absolutely 100% has been verified and is 100% accurate.

so much was done to him and i may have flew off the handle, my bad 190.219.146.35 (talk) 22:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Sana Shahnawaz
The article is about a television producer and a fashion designer, the page was deleted due to the lack of notability as this the producer first tv project, but producer itself wasn't an unknown individual. More sources are now available with the success of producer's project. So i request to restore the page, otherwise i would have to go through from beginning. -Muhammad Faizan Naeem  04:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Sana Shahnawaz, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

AirMyPC
Title AirMyPC exists in this wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AirPlay as an AirPlay Mirroring Client -Wampw (talk) 12:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It isn't clear exactly what you want done here. AirMyPC is a properly-deleted redirect, because we don't redirect from main space to draft space. AirPlay is a different article. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Wampw, it looks like the article was moved to AfC because it wasn't ready for the main space. From what I can see at Draft:AirMyPC, the article had issues with sourcing and tone, both of which are things that need to be addressed. You can still edit and improve the article at AfC. Now as far as the AirPlay article goes, being mentioned on another page doesn't mean that this particular piece of software is independently notable, as notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by any association with other notable software, items, or companies. In the case of this software, it looks like it's a program developed independently of Apple, meaning that it's not Apple software, so it really wouldn't inherit any notability in this case. To be honest, it's kind of debatable whether or not it should be mentioned on the AirPlay article since ideally the article should only mention notable instances of third party software that works with AirPlay. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The reason for this is that there can be dozens upon dozens of third party software for any given thing, so it's not really feasible to list each one. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Animal Help Now
DaveInCO (talk) 20:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Draft:Animal Help Now is rather blatantly promotional. I'd recommend to redo the draft with less adulatory tone, rather than to seek restoration.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Draft:Animal Help Now: May I at least see it, so that I recover the parts that aren't promotional?
 * I have emailed you a copy. JohnCD (talk) 21:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Nasaan
''I, Skyegh1234, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Skyegh1234 (talk) 05:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done It looks like it was deleted because it was blank, however it wasn't - it just had issues with formatting. I've restored and fixed the article so the content will show up. Happy editing! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Tom & Jerry-Piano Concerto.jpg
I've request this image for undeletion. I want to warm on it. It's from page The Cat Concerto. YoshiFan155 (talk) 05:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done It is going to have to be used and have a fair use rationale added, else it will be chopped again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Outram Trophy
''I, Petechilcott, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Petechilcott (talk) 21:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Believeingood/sandbox/R.B. Walsh (Risteárd Breathnach)
I believe the page was deleted because it had not been re-submitted since its creation in December. It was rejected at that time because of lack of 3rd party references. I have added them now and apart from some modifications that I will need help with, like uploading a photo, editing the title name and creating a re-direct, the page is ready for re-submission. "Save page" button below
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page requested has never been deleted, either. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 23:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Click on the blue resubmit button in the big pink box if you want it to be reviewed again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

File:LonesomeMouse2.jpg and File:LonesomeMouse4.jpg
Please restore these images, as I think they're part of The Lonesome Mouse page. YoshiFan155 (talk) 17:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done They are going to have to be used and have a fair use rationale added, else they will be chopped again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Believeingood/sandbox/R.B. Walsh (Risteárd Breathnach)
Believeingood (talk) 15:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Click on the blue resubmit button in the big pink box if you want it to be reviewed again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Vienna D.C. Timberwolves
Horakw (talk) 12:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Notability. JohnCD (talk) 12:48, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Mhplayme1/sandbox
''I, Mhplayme1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mhplayme1 (talk) 13:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Requesting re-activation of this article previously submitted to Wikipedia and rejected. I am learning more about citing reference sources and want to continue and complete this article for re-submission.

Thank you very much for your consideration,

Michael Hellyer Aurora, Illinois, USA
 * ✅ - see below. JohnCD (talk) 13:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Request for reinstatement of draft article: Arthur Lawrence "Art" Hellyer, Jr.


I intend to now complete and re-submit this article for consideration. It had been rejected and I would like to revise according to your recommendations to emphasize subject notability, re-wording to sound more encyclopedic, and providing reference sources in detail and proper format.

I hope you can restore this article for me so I can try to re-submit a final edition for your consideration.

Thank you very much!

Michael Hellyer Aurora, Illinois, USA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhplayme1 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Bogi Fabian
''I, Gabor Vajda, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gabor Vajda (talk) 17:52, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Finishing and editing the draft made by another person -Gabor Vajda (talk) 17:54, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also this is much too promotional and needs references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red meetup articles created by Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant
These were speedied as created by a sockpuppet, but they were done as part of requested articles from the Women in Red project. Looking at Stefi Baum and Judith Young (astronomer), which were saved before deleting, they are likely to be OK, and at least looked at before deleting. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:50, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ - My philosophy on articles deleted under G5 is that if an editor in good standing requests that the articles be undeleted, that editor is willing to take responsibility for the content, and the blocked editor wasn't blocked over content issues (and the articles in question aren't otherwise problematic), I'm willing to undelete them; while I understand the logic behind deterring blocked editors, I don't see why we have to get rid of content that good editors are willing to vouch for. StarryGrandma, since you requested the undeletion, I'll leave it to you to vouch for the content of the articles; they all look fine to me (as they're not particularly long), but since astronomy isn't really my area of expertise I'd rather not vouch for the content myself. If you're unwilling to vouch for any of the articles upon review, let me know and I'll re-delete them. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 00:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. StarryGrandma (talk) 01:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Unspell
Please undelete. I would like to continue working on the article. I have found additional citations. Yabti (talk) 09:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

oda paccy
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -105.179.1.154 (talk) 09:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Oda Paccy is Rwandan Hip Hop artist.
 * Since this was an A7 speedy delete you should ask the deleting admin User:RHaworth to reconsider and undelete for you. Because it says singles were commercially successful, it seems to be a claim of importance. Though if I see a rap article I will tend not to restore it myself! That is why I refer you to the deleter. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Shobi136
its my user page on Wikipedia for my editing and writing of so many article Shobi136 (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC) "Save page" button below -Shobi136 (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That user has edited very few pages including the deleted ones. Have you been working from another user name? I say this because the userpage User:Shobi136 seems to have fictional work documented. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Shobi136
It's my user page I want to edit and write on Wikipedia I want to do my work on please give it to me -Shobi136 (talk) 12:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You can recreate this, but it is not a place to advertise yourself, and avoid making misleading statements. You will be after User:shobi136. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Shobi136
i dont have any other user name and i want to undo my page i dont have use any misleading statements and its not a personal adertisements is my user page just 13:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)13:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC) -Shobi136 (talk) 13:37, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * As mentioned above, you may recreate it but you will have to avoid using this space to post resume like information or advertorials. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Victura
''I, Jwgraham9, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jwgraham9 (talk) 14:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC) Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Vishwas Nangare Patil
I would like to work on the page to try and improve it, I felt it was well sourced and the subject had independent sources  Thank you FITINDIA&#160;(talk) 13:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC) -FITINDIA&#160;(talk)</b></i> 13:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Vishwas Nangare Patil, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC):Thank you I requested the concerned admin- <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">FIT</b><b style="color:orange">INDIA</b>&#160;<b style="color:red">(talk)</b></i> 15:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

CAPD_library
CAPD library is well known C++ package in the community of rigorous numerics. It is used by many authors in their computer assisted proofs and cited in many papers. articles that link to CAPD webpage Unfortunately there is no paper describing CAPD, that can be cited. -Hamlet77 (talk) 21:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Institute of Food Research
Page has been deleted by admin as being being too promotional, however as the page is now deleted it's impossible to verify this, or indeed improve the page and replace the offending text with verifiable information. The admin suggests that all of the text was derived from a press release, however the page itself isn't new and is referenced from a number of other pages so could this have instead been from an edit copying and pasting from the institute's own website? Hhu362n (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC) -Hhu362n (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done reverted to a less promotional 2009 version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Financial Fortitude Radio Show
Leaddog1969 (talk) 22:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Financial Fortitude Radio Show


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Abdullah (band)
Articles should not be prodded twice. -duffbeerforme (talk) 03:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Francisco Torrent-Guasp
This is a page on an important Spanish anatomist who first discovered that the entire ventricular myocardium exists as a single band of muscle helically wrapped around extending from the pulmonary artery to the aorta. This architectural description is the basis to understand strain ultrasound imaging and more. His page exists both in the Spanish and catalan version of Wikipedia; the english page would be a translation -165.214.12.81 (talk) 22:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * There never was a page with that name here, unfortunately. You could start a translation at Draft:Francisco Torrent-Guasp, though.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:32, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * there was a page called Francisco torrent-guasp, but it is not worth restoring, the largest content was talk only thus:

I am in full agreement that I do not fully understand the contributions made by Francisco Torrent-Guasp to the larger world of cardiovascular physiology. I think you need to understand that his contributions are well embraced by the Spanish medical community, especially those reading Wikipedia. I do not seek to create an article; just a merger between Spanish and English Wiki.--lbeben 01:24, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

So I am supporting Jo-Jo Eumerus's suggestion to create a new translation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I think the IP may be . Lbeben, you can request an article at Requested articles, as this is the proper way to request an article on Wikipedia. Posting a request on where the article might be placed won't really accomplish much and will just be speedy deleted. I'll be honest in that there's an enormous backlog on the request pages and the best option is to just translate the article yourself, as the wait for the article's translation and creation could be indefinite. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:William Newman (computer scientist)
George Coulouris (talk) 15:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" JohnCD (talk) 16:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Inova Translational Medicine Institute
''I, PaigeWarm23, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' PaigeWarm23 (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Would like to start editing again and creating my page, please send me my work back -PaigeWarm23 (talk) 18:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

''I, PaigeWarm23, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' PaigeWarm23 (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 19:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Rococo Chocolates
''I, Tomxcoady, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Tomxcoady (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

There was no response to my previous undelete request and I wish to complete editing this page. -Tomxcoady (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Delhi Institute of Professional Studies
''I, Dips delhi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dips delhi (talk) 19:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Delhi Institute of Professional Studies - also please change you user id to one that does not represent the institute. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Aharon Elgrissy
I am writing the page and I have just edited the work for it. I ask you please to either do not post this page anywhere or use it for anything else. I'm doing now a new page with the same name that I would like to post. -Giorgio ucla (talk) 21:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * So do you want us to restore the page? From your request to delete and the text above it sounds like you do not want us to restore.  But that is what this page is for. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't restore it anyway, except to userfy or put into draft space. It was far from being suitable for main space. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Mario64dscourtyardlwm.jpg and File:Fattymariosm64ds.jpg




The image is uploaded, but no picture. I want it restored, this is also true for. YoshiFan155 (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * what you uploaded was deleted because there wasn't any image in it. It consisted of . That is the code you would use to place the image in an article, if it existed, but it was deleted (eight years ago) because it did not meet the requirements of WP:NFCC.


 * File:Fattymariosm64ds.jpg was deleted (nearly ten years ago) because it was an unused fair-use image.


 * If these images are restored, you will have to add Fair Use Rationales explaining how they meet all ten requirements of WP:NFCCP. Can you do that? If not, they will just be deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I noticed that you added a second file to this. In the future, please make a new request if you see a second file that you want restored. The reason for this is that we don't always see when things are added to old requests. It also poses a problem if you've received a reply to one request - adding something new could be confusing. In any case, it looks like the second file was deleted for the same reason posted above by . You need to be able to add the fair use rationale or it will be deleted again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Marie Danielle
I created a page under the name Marie danielle. Since Danielle wasn't capitalized I moved the page to Marie Danielle. The original page, Marie danielle, was deleted. But Marie Danielle is gone as well. -Mariedanielle444 (talk) 05:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Mariedanielle444, it looks like this was deleted as unambiguous promotion. We can't restore those on here, but you can ask the deleting admin if he can e-mail you a copy. I'm also concerned that it looks like you are writing about yourself, so I'd like to caution you that writing autobiographies is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. It's usually better to wait for someone else to write an article about you or at the very least, to only create the article via WP:AfC - although make sure that the article would pass notability guidelines at WP:NARTIST. Notability guidelines on Wikipedia are very strict and many people, even popular singers with a small fan following, don't pass. You can establish notability through coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspaper articles, as existing as a performer will not give automatic notability on Wikipedia. (This is not meant to sound rude, just to explain guidelines.) I'd also recommend against putting all of your social media links in the external links section, as these should already be in your official website. Not only would that make the links redundant, but in many cases putting these links in the article can make it seem promotional, even if that was not your intent. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Christopher Bevans
want to work on it -LoveLarry1234 (talk) 12:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:00, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Chaderjian
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Chaderjian (talk) 21:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ the content was just which would result in deletion again if restored.  You can write something new. If you are talking about Paul Chaderjian, it is not yet deleted, and you can say why it should not be deleted at Articles for deletion/Paul Chaderjian. It is not a good idea to write about yourself on Wikipedia.  See WP:Autobiography. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Manan Shah (Ethical Hacker)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Geeknnerd (talk) 04:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * There's already a declined draft at Draft:Manan Shah, but see also Sockpuppet investigations/Nxtgenwiki and the AFD discussion. Grayfell (talk) 04:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done As the admin who closed that AfD I'm not going to restore it. If you want, you can take it up at WP:DRV. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Jerrybrassiere.jpg and File:Yankeedoodlemousescreen.jpg
I've requested these 2 non-fair use files for undeletion. YoshiFan155 (talk) 00:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * We will need a fair use rationale explanation from you, particularly explaining how this criterion 8 applies "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding" The current rationales are missing altogether. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

One of the images shows Tom flying and the other shows Jerry is a fair use for me. YoshiFan155 (talk) 01:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi . Do you understand the difference between freely licensed and non-free content/fair use when it comes to using images on Wikipedia? The former can be used pretty much in any way as long as it complies with WP:IUP, but each usage of the latter must satisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria listed in WP:NFCCP in addition to the IUP. You previously requested the undeletion of File:Tom & Jerry-Piano Concerto.jpg above in Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion and it was undeleted per your request by . You also requested the undeletion of File:LonesomeMouse2.jpg and File:LonesomeMouse4.jpg in Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion, and these were also undeleted by Graeme Bartlett. However, each of these files has already been tagged for speedy deletion per WP:F5 because they are not being used in any articles.
 * You have made quite a number of other deletion requests both here and on the user talk pages of other editors, but it's not clear how you're intending to incorporate these non-free images into any articles. You say I want to work on them like you did here and here, but it's not clear what that exactly means. Perhaps, it would be best for you to concentrate on "working on" one non-free image at a time because if you try to do too many at once, they are just going to end up being deleted once again. Wikipedia is not intended to be a repository for image files, and will not host these files forever if they are not being used in accordance with WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

I actually uploaded them, but they're empty. YoshiFan155 (talk) 18:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)


 * no, you didn't upload the images. What you uploaded was text like . That is the code you would use to place the image in an article, if the image existed. Putting it in the image file does not upload the image. I have explained that to you before. Please stop doing that, it only wastes time.


 * If the image you want has never been uploaded, see Help:Introduction to uploading images.


 * If it has been uploaded here but then deleted, this is the place to ask for undeletion; but files like these are copyright, so they can only be held in Wikipedia if they are used in an article, and they satisfy all ten of the conditions in WP:NFCCP. If we undelete them, you will have to provide a Fair Use Rationale explaining how they satisfy those requirements, in particular how " its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding (WP:NFCCP #8).


 * So, as you have been asked several times, please explain what you want these images for, what article they would be used in, and how they satisfy the NFCC requirements. Why are they necessary for readers' understanding of the article topic? If you can't do that, we won't undelete, because they would only be deleted again after seven days. If you just want them because you think they make the article look prettier, that's not a good enough reason for using copyright images. JohnCD (talk) 21:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I won't upload files in that way.

The file description for is Jerry uses a brassiere as a makeshift parachute in "The Yankee Doodle Mouse"

The file description for is Jerry tricks Tom into using his own paws to tie his rocket in "The Yankee Doodle Mouse"

That's the source and screenshot. YoshiFan155 (talk) 05:18, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Please read what I wrote above. Just describing a file is not enough. It will not be undeleted unless you explain (a) what article you want to use it in, and (b) how it satisfies WP:NFCCP #8, that is, why "its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". JohnCD (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

File:FlyingSorceress2a.jpg, File:FlyingSorceress3a.jpg, File:SmittenKitten4.jpg and File:TomandJerryTitleCard3.jpg
"I request the undeletion this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13" YoshiFan155 (talk) 20:29, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * First I would like to see a justification for fair use. I assume you are the same person as is asking for the other cartoon images and then not fixing up the WP:fair use rationale. Please explain how these images will help understanding of the article. Also I prefer if you use the template as it makes our life easier! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * A fair use rationale has to explain how this will help understanding of the topic. How do they help? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett They were deleted 6 years ago, because they were orphaned non-free files, but I believe they're not orphaned non-free files under CSD F5. A fair use shows description of Tom, Jerry, Jerry's devil and the witch. YoshiFan155 (talk) 02:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Just for reference File:Image:SmittenKitten4.jpg was removed from Smitten Kitten with this edit by . Regarding the three other files, File:FlyingSoceress2a.jpg was removed from The Flying Sorceress by with this edit while File:FlyingSorceress3a.jpg and File:TomandJerryTitleCard3.jpg were removed by Nehrams2020 with this edit. The files do not seem to have been accidentally removed or removed due to vandalism, but for specific policy based reasons.So, simply re-adding them without addressing the reasons why they were removed in the first place is likely going to have them removed and deleted once again. Nehrams2020 has not edited since January of this year, but Aspects seems to be still active. Both have been editors for quite a long time and seem to be pretty experienced with film articles, so they probably would not have removed the files unless they felt their use didn't comply with WP:NFCC. Perhaps one of them will comment and provide more details. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Nehrams2020 or Aspects didn't reply. I want to see these 4 images badly. They're not on any other site. YoshiFan155 (talk) 18:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Then will you please do what I and other keep asking you and produce draft non-free use rationales for each file so that any admin can assess that they are restoring a file (or files) that meet the NFCC and are not wasting their time on files that do not or cannot meet the non-free use criteria. Nthep (talk) 19:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * you have altered your request to say they were deleted under WP:CSD. That's nonsense: they were all deleted under WP:CSD Orphaned non-free use images. JohnCD (talk) 21:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yoshi1955: I want to see these 4 images badly is not really a sufficient justification for non-free use and is unlikely going get the files undeleted by an admin. Also, WP:NFCC requires that proper source information be provided for a non-free image for copyrgiht verification. These files had to come from somewhere, so perhaps an admin like or  can provide you with the source link for the files so that you can see them. Finally, Aspects and Nehrams2020 may not have replied yet, but they still can if they wish. Wikipedia editors are volunteers and they sometimes get busy. Editors are not required to immediately respond to every ping they get or every question they are asked. Editors do not have to reply at all if they do not want to. The reasons given for removing the files are clearly given in their edit sums, so we have to assume the file's were removed in good faith until it can be shown otherwise. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:42, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The source for all four of these images was "screenshot from a DVD". Nthep (talk) 22:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

The description for File:SmittenKitten4.jpg is Jerry's devil does a deal.

The description for File:TomandJerryTitleCard3.jpg is Tom and Jerry title card seen only on six cartoons made in 1955 and 1956 for The Flying Sorceress.

The description for File:FlyingSorceress2a.jpg is Notice for the first time a human's full head can be seen.

The description for File:FlyingSorceress3a.jpg is Tom is about to have the best dream he could possibly have. YoshiFan155 (talk) 02:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Just describing a file is not enough. A copyright image will not be undeleted unless you explain (a) what article you want to use it in, and (b) how it satisfies WP:NFCCP #8, that is, why "its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". JohnCD (talk) 13:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)