Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 240

kfc index
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Achhagan (talk) 09:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC) This is simply adding to the coverage that the Big Mac Index does when measuring PPP. I have tried to make this clear in the differences section. The Bic Mac covers most of the world, but limited to Africa. The KFC Index does the same thing solely for Africa, therefore compliments it quite well.

It is not meant to promote the sales of a product, as it is a free publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achhagan (talk • contribs) 09:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * because there is nothing to do. The article isn't deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:360 Finance
''I, Aconnellan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Aconnellan (talk) 04:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Pramod Attarde1
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pramod Attarde1 (talk) 18:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * There is nothing to do as the page is not deleted. However note that Wikipedia is not the pace to write about yourself.  You are welcome to contribute in other ways to enhance Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia, so we need people to write or add to articles here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Alphabet Soup (film)
Believe it or not, I am the person who made that hoax. I have recently discovered Alternate History Wiki and would like to move it there. Thanks. Now I&#39;ve gotta play them all. (talk) 22:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I have emailed you a copy of the text. JohnCD (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Oligochaetology
''I, Andycor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Andycor (talk) 14:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary - uUnless there is more to say about this than a simple word definition, you might do better to post it at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Briana Roy
''I, Theroypublicist, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Theroypublicist (talk) 15:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

cake 4 gift
i have no idea why my page cake 4 gift have been deleted please help. -101.59.214.11 (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You might want to check your talk page user talk:Yash jhambh, which explains that the article was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD because it contained no credible assertion of notability. As such, it isn't eligible for restoration by request on this page. You can ask the deleting admin on User talk:Randykitty about restoring it to user space or draft space for you to improve. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:36, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Bili vegas
''I, 74.88.25.159, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 74.88.25.159 (talk) 22:40, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hyperpallium
''I, MultiPoly, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' MultiPoly (talk) 01:46, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

The Conventioneers
The article got PROD due to notability and sourcing concerns. The last point is admittedly a valid one, but I feel the subject is notable. The show ran for seven seasons, received some international distribution, and perhaps most importantly, got in trouble with a notable watchdog group. I intend to work on the article. -Damnedfan1234 (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC) Damnedfan1234 (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Ayesha Nazir Jatt
i want to update it i have lots or refrence links and data about it -Shobi136 (talk) 07:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Ayesha Nazir Jatt, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Fragapalooza
Page is relevant and contains data that is not located anywhere else - we were recording our attendance numbers on the site as well as other data relevant to the event. If anything I would like the content if I cannot get the page restored. -Melbosa (talk) 17:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Might want to address the issues that PRODded the page for, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

European Business Awards
We are a business and awards programme which is highly regarded in Europe and aim to encourage business growth in Europe and then click the "Save page" button below -164.39.166.235 (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/European Business Awards, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- GB fan 12:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * This user couldn't take "no" for an answer, and created a substantially identical article, which is now deleted again. One more time and it will be protected from re-creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Why Ahmadiyyas are not Muslims
This article is an encyclopedia article about the book -Chunakkutti (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌. It does not appear that this book meets Wikipedia's notability standard for books, explained at WP:Notability (books). JohnCD (talk) 18:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you restore the article i will improve the article Chunakkutti (talk) 18:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Then start a new version. In draft space, preferably: Draft:Why Ahmadiyyas are not Muslims. There is nothing worthwhile restoring in the deleted version, it's just one sentence "Why Ahmadiyyas are not Muslims is an open letter to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the current leader of the Ahmadiyyas. Its Written by Aboobacker Amani" with a bunch of refspam links to the book. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * But you will be wasting your time, because No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. It is quite clear that this book does not meet the requirements of WP:Notability (books). It is not listed in Worldcat or on Amazon or Google Books; the ISBN number returns no results. The only review I have found is on Goodreads, which gives it 5 stars, but as the review is by the book's author that counts for nothing. JohnCD (talk) 20:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry this listed in amazon. see here. http://www.amazon.in/Why-Ahmadiyyas-are-not-Muslims/dp/1533514496/ Chunakkutti (talk) 20:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * So it is: I looked at Amazon.com, not Amazon.in. Well, make a draft if you like, but read WP:BKCRIT and WP:BKTS first, and understand that it will not be accepted unless you give references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 20:45, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sanomechanics
''I, Bbezverk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bbezverk (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That draft comes off as fairly promotional to me, and I wonder about WP:FRINGE and WP:MEDRS compliance. It will need a cleanup if restored.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Please identify what sounds promotional -- will be very happy to fix. The page was meant to explain/inform on mainstream biomechanical research (results came out of a Tufts Medical School study. Here's the journalistic/pop-science write-up: http://www.healio.com/orthotics-prosthetics/prosthetics/news/print/o-and-p-news/%7B8c964a6e-b0ea-4bd3-a21f-a29feae7fa3c%7D/new-research-could-lead-to-healthier-joints-better-gait-for-amputees, and here's a scientific article in Nature: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep08103#author-information  Would be really good to know what specifically triggers red flags (medical advice? there's no advice.  If there were criticism of research, it would be addressed in the article, but the topic, to the best of my knowledge, isn't controversial)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbezverk (talk • contribs) 16:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The thing that worries me the most is the extremely positive tone of the draft: The benefits of the Sanomechanics exercises are wide-reaching and include those used to alleviate lower back pain, neck pain, shoulder problems, a condition known as tennis elbow, knee pain, and some forms of arthritis.. This makes promises with no sources, rather than documenting the scope. At the same time, benefits of the Sanomechanics exercises can be seen right now is very unspecific and sounds promotional as well.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * This is very helpful, and can of course be edited. I can work on a more neutral tone -- if the draft page is restored. Which hasn't happened.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbezverk (talk • contribs) 21:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I've restored it now, sorry! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I've restored it now, sorry! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greg Moyer
''I, 2604:2000:F80F:B700:8D55:6E0:F780:3BE6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2604:2000:F80F:B700:8D55:6E0:F780:3BE6 (talk) 21:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Greg Moyer. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greg Moyer
''I, 2604:2000:F80F:B700:8D55:6E0:F780:3BE6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2604:2000:F80F:B700:8D55:6E0:F780:3BE6 (talk) 21:56, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Already answered - see above. You only need to ask once. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

2XL TrophyLite Rally
expired prod -Prisencolin (talk) 04:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

File:CWL Logo.png
non free file apparently deleted after it was vandalized after file was removed from page -Prisencolin (talk) 04:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * that file was deleted on Commons and has never been on en-wp as far as I can see. If you want to use it as fair-use, you'll have to find a source and upload it here. I don't know whether Commons might be willing to undelete and transfer it. JohnCD (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

2016 Ramadan attacks
I am not contesting the outcome of the deletion discussion, however I am formulating an Arbitration Enforcement action against a user and some of their misconduct was within this now-deleted article. I would like this article temporarily undeleted (not necessarily in mainspace) for review. -AnotherNewAccount (talk) 15:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * May want to ask the administrators that work in AE to undelete it, in your enforcement request. Unless you need to read it yourself.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I would be prepared to email you a copy of the text, if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "user profile" tab enter your email address (which will not be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 18:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I'm honestly not really interested in the text, I am interested in the editing history, and possibly that of the talk page too; I need to present diffs involving the conduct of the user in question. Ideally it needs to be viewable by both that user and other participating editors. You can blank the content, "NOINDEX" it, move it all to Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/2016 Ramadan attacks - or perhaps the best idea - undelete and redirect to List of terrorist incidents, 2016. I don't mind. AnotherNewAccount (talk) 18:42, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. Pinging, the deleting admin, for his view. JohnCD (talk) 20:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * As I've said on my user talk page: That is in my view not a sufficient reason for restoring content the community wants deleted. If there is actionable misconduct by an editor, chances are that it can also be shown through edits of non-deleted articles; if not, it likely does not warrant action.  Sandstein   20:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * This is now addressed, see WP:AE.  Sandstein   15:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Tony Granger
This page is accurate and should be updated. 204.10.132.7 (talk) 15:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Gabrielle
 * ✅. Since the deletion debate at WP:Articles for deletion/Tony Granger was closed as SOFTDELETE, the page is restored on request. Note that it may be re-nominated: please add any additional references to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Bill Goodwyn
''I, ShawneeDiscovery, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' ShawneeDiscovery (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please do not copy other people's writing into this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Artem Lobov
Originally deleted because he was considered not to have sufficient fights in a major organisation, he now does - I will update his fight record with new UFC if/when the page is restored. Thanks for assistance -LeinsterLad (talk) 03:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Artem Lobov, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is the case, should be willing to restore/userfy. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Laurette Nicoll
172.242.52.243 (talk) 21:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

User:DJ CHAIRMAN
Good Day, My name is Godfrey Motheogane and my disk jockey name is DJ Chairman. I created a page on wikipedia for DJ CHAIRMAN For promotional use of my music services and to build a brand. This page was deleted on wikipedia because it does not conform to the rules of wikipedia and the reason that wikipedia gave me for deleting my page was Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. I agree with your reasons and i take responsibility for the deletion of my page. My only request is that can i please have a a copy of the contents that was on that page so that i can find other online blogs where i can host my profile. I am really sorry for this inconvenience and i will respect wikipedia in future. Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ CHAIRMAN (talk • contribs) 09:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have emailed a copy to you. No need to apologise: Wikipedia does not make clear to new users what it is not for, so it is not surprising that many people think it is just another social-networking site. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Moranaffa
I would still to like to contribute to Wikipedia -Moranaffa (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Um ... sure (Moranaffa does not exist). However, I'd recommend you to make sure that the biographies you write satisfy the WP:PEOPLE notability policy.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Edin Murga
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Manos H. Scorer (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

The player has played in a fully profesional league. Plus the references are from reliable sources. Thank you.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Edin Murga, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Technically, the article was then reposted and redeleted as G4 by, but I am sceptical on restoring this G4 without the prior AfD being overturned.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * My reply here covers this page as well. Despite being updated, the article did not address the concerns in the AfD (i.e. WP:NFOOTY, WP:GNG. Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Stephen Lendman
I added references as asked but the page still was deleted. What do I do to have the page remain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbeason (talk • contribs) 16:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Asking about this, but I wonder if the issue was that these references seem to talk about the book rather than the individual.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * They appear to be in the manner of personal references, rather than citations to WP:RSes supporting the text (the little blue numbers you see on most articles). Here's the references section from the article:


 * CLARITY PRESS (address: 2625 Piedmont Rd. NE. Atlanta GA) regarding the three books published there!
 * Ellen Brown (web of Debt) book review for the book How Wall Street Fleeces America by S Lendman
 * John McMurtry ( Unequal Freedoms- The Global Market as an Ethical System)
 * Peter Phillips ( President Media Freedom Foundation/ Project Censored) for Stephen's award from that Project Censored!}}


 * I mean, I just deleted it as an expired PROD, so I have no objection to restoring it if actual references for the text can be found. Though probably a draft would be a better idea, seeing as the text doesn't have the refs as yet. See Citing sources for how to do it. - David Gerard (talk) 21:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Please restore it and I will add references that meet Wiki needs. thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbeason (talk • contribs) 22:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I've restored it to Draft:Stephen Lendman, with all the history (including previous deleted versions, I wasn't aware it had been PRODed before). Make sure you read over WP:BLP, Wikipedia is very fussy that articles about living people be well referenced. Good luck writing an article that sticks when it's moved to mainspace :-) - David Gerard (talk) 23:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Aayo1978/sandbox/ContractCareers
''I, 120.147.68.29, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 120.147.68.29 (talk) 03:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see User:Aayo1978/sandbox/ContractCareers Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kerry Babbage
''I, 103.29.31.46, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 103.29.31.46 (talk) 01:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here Kerry Babbage is a Public Personality and Community Leader, Speaker and Human Rights Activist and then click the "Save page" button below -AzzekezzA (talk) 01:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * While that may be true the page used very promotional language unsuitable for an encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Dr. Mohammad Tahir Shah
Dr. Mohammad Tahir Shah is the Vice Chancellor of FATA University, Pakistan which is the first ever university established in the Federal Administratored Area in KPK Pakistan, He has great achievements in the field of Geology and Environmental Sciences. He as been given the Presidential Awards in the field of Sciences by Government of Pakistan. Links have been updated on the Page. And References have been given also. People who are less popular and with less achievements are present on the wikipedia. This information is added so that many students and the people can visit his page and find his research papers and references for there future work and research. So it is requested to kindly not delete this page. -Syed Sajid Shah mashwani (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. "X exists, therefore Y should" is not a valid argument to make. Please read WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people), and note that we do not accept CVs. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The page is now at Mohammad Tahir Shah and is not threatened with deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sticky Learning (G13: Abandoned Article for creation – to retrieve it, see WP:REFUND/G13)
Darrenasmithmtm (talk) 08:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Now at Draft:Sticky learning (different capitalization). ~Amatulić (talk) 05:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Edgar_Littlefield
''I, 155.178.180.5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 155.178.180.5 (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That's been deleted under G13 and restored already once. DO you plan to work on it soon? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Camp Walden
''I, Pattwala, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Pattwala (talk) 14:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

I would like to make another attempt at getting this page published, however the Wikipedia draft was unfortunately the only place where the copy exists. I would like to retrieve it so I can take it out of Wikipedia to write the copy, then come back and attempt to publish. Thank you. -Pattwala (talk) 14:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Seancombs84/Boi Sirius
''I, Seancombs84, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Seancombs84 (talk) 10:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

letoya makhene
i want to improve the article with good sources. -Mhlabauyangilinga (talk) 13:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. please add independent sources to Letoya Makhene in order to avoid deletion again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

scheibe's dysplasia
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Musketeers.svu (talk) 07:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Musketeers.svu It looks like you requested the page's deletion in the past, which is why it was deleted. There's not really that much to be restored, but I have no true issue with restoring it. Offhand I will warn you that you will need to source the page with in-line citations and you also need to make sure to write it in layman's terms as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

User:DJ CHAIRMAN
Good Day, My name is Godfrey Motheogane and my disk jockey name is DJ Chairman. I created a page on wikipedia for DJ CHAIRMAN For promotional use of my music services and to build a brand. This page was deleted on wikipedia because it does not conform to the rules of wikipedia and the reason that wikipedia gave me for deleting my page was Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. I agree with your reasons and i take responsibility for the deletion of my page. Can you please send me a copy of the images that was on my Wikipedia page please. I do not have a backup of them. I am really sorry for this inconvenience.i am currently looking for other online blogs where i can host my profile. I am really sorry for this inconvenience and i will respect wikipedia in future. Many Thanks -The Music Producer 08:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The content was sent out to you via this request, however I'm not really sure that we can e-mail images since ideally you would already have these images on your personal computer. Some of them are on Wikimedia Commons still, so you can find these images here and here. The other images were just generic images uploaded to the Commons. You can use them off-Wikipedia, but make sure that you use them according to the copyrights. (File:Kookie Studio Mixer.JPG, File:CCRMA (2), June 13, 2011.jpg, File:Drum set.svg, File:Reflection Filter & Pop Filter.jpg)
 * Offhand here's one piece of advice I can give if you're setting up your website/blogs/etc. Less tends to be more at times and I would recommend that you not use an image if it doesn't closely or exactly represent the materials/equipment you're using in real life. (IE, it can be seen as a bit deceptive if I show an image of professional grade, cutting edge equipment and I'm using a basic microphone or very old equipment. You can do this, but this does tend to look bad when people go to these pages. Part of the charm of amateur music is seeing how people work with little to no professional equipment and seeing how they overcome this.) Putting too many images on a page can make a page look bad and feel clumsy to maneuver around, which can make everything seem more amateurish. When setting up pages it's best to just go for minimalism than anything else.
 * I'd also recommend that since you're looking to promote yourself, that you use websites like Wix or Weebly. These sites tend to give you a basic template that you can use to set up your page, which can be a huge help when you're just starting out since it'll make things look a little more professional. They're also free, which is an added bonus. Blogs are also good, but be careful since they're set up to be more like a diary than anything else and setting those up to seem professional can be kind of difficult sometimes. I'd recommend setting up the main website on Wix or Weebly and then using a blog to record your creative process in general and to give basic updates. A lot of professionals tend to use this format. Wikis might be good at some point, but keep in mind that those can be slightly difficult to set up since they're expected to be extensive and most can be edited by any user - I'd focus on setting up the website first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Offhand I don't see where any of your images were deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Your images were on Commons, and were deleted there. Commons is a separate organization - the deleted images are listed on your user talk page there. You would have to ask on Commons whether they would be willing to send you copies. There are still two images on Commons not deleted, see Commons:Special:Contributions/DJ_CHAIRMAN - I would copy those soon, if you want them. JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Serving the Poorest of the Poor - Work for Poverty Alleviation by Bhai Trilochan Singh Panesar
Premjit Panesar (talk) 14:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You did already ask for restoration once, which was granted and then followed by another G13 when nothing happened. Do you plan to work on it soon? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

saurabh kushwaha
Requesting an Undeletion. Islo123 (talk) 12:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * the page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Articles for deletion/Saurabh kushwaha, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (people) first. JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Vaasthu Vidya Gurukulam
For rewriting the entire article -Alexandereventual (talk) 10:54, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * the article was deleted as a copyright infringement, so it cannot be restored. Wikipedia cannot host copyright material, even temporarily. I will email you a copy of the text, if you like. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

File:WOLV Records logo.png + Carnage (DJ)


This image, which was uploaded in July 2015 was deleted by Explicit back in February under F5. I would like to request this page be restored so I can license them under a free license or in the public domain, because I think that these logos are simple and consists of text. I would like to request these pages be restored so I can license them under a free license or in the public domain, because I think that these logos are simple and consists of text. And also this page named "Carnage (DJ)" was deleted for this reason: 08:04, 19 April 2016 Sandstein (talk | contribs) deleted page Carnage (DJ) (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carnage (DJ) closed as delete), because it has a little depth of coverage in reliable sources and appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record, fails WP:BIO, WP:ANYBIO and WP:MUSBIO. I would like to request these pages be restored and moved into "draft space" so I can improve it. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. XPanettaa (talk) 19:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Restored the logo, for the article I'll request to comment.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * In my view, undeletion requests should show how the article can be made ready for main space in the near future, e.g. through references to new reliable sources.  Sandstein   21:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

CoNetrix
The page "CoNetrix" was deleted by Orangemike on August 19, 2009 for Advertising. Can the page please be restored to a user page so that I can work on it and ensure it follows all rules for posting? -Prlandru (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Prlandru/CoNetrix. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Mick Murphy
''I, Burlington Bert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Burlington Bert (talk) 15:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * What do you intend to do to this? I restored it earlier this year and there were no improvements made. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I intend to make updates and improvements to the article, including new/amended references and the provision of new biographical information Burlington Bert (talk) 11:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kavita Kiran
''I, Kavitakiran, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' KavitaKiran 03:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Andrei Nițu
Played 2 matches in Liga I, a proffesional football league, as of transfermarkt -Ionutzmovie (talk) 18:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Andrei Nițu, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishad bathiudeen
Rishad bathiudeen, is a prominent member of Srilanka and the Minister Ruling party, this article is cinsists valuble unformation about him, which is not available in wikipedia, as well this is the correctly spelled name of minister, by the way, i have submitted all the related refrences to his bio. -Getuplk (talk) 11:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * there was already an article at Rishad Bathiudeen (with upper-case "B"). Yours has bee redirected to point to that. You are welcome to improve it if you have more, sourced information. JohnCD (talk) 12:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

dj kentalky
I want to add notability of Wikipedia MusicBio due to what the consensus have stated "Article lacks Wikipedia musicBio" -Markzy90 (talk) 20:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)--Markzy90 (talk) 20:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Dj Kentalky, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. There was also a repost then deleted under G4, which I am inclined to consider on the same merits as the AfD deletion.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Various files


how many times do we have to go through this? there is no copyright on U.S. Government documents. period. I am so sick and tired of having to get a lawyer and defend every image, two or three times. its intolerable!! User:Brian in denver
 * Refactoring this and pinging and . Not all of these files seem to be US government works, but then nor am I convinced that "online sources" is a requirement for file sources.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:40, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Tagging and deletion were in error, as there was a source. And our requester had the wrong idea about why they were deleted too, as they were all deleted for "no source" not copyright infringement.  Naturally we need a source to show that they are US Gov publications.  In some cases the source was unclear, but apparently valid, but still should not have been speedy deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Konstant Infosolutions
Page contain all the required citations and references that were asked at the time of previous deletion. The page is all genuine now. I hereby take the responsibility that the content on the page is all unique and genuine. -Manishjain03 (talk) 11:12, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The page may be genuine, and now quite different. However the references supplied are not independent of the company, but are instead things it is a member of. see WP:Notability. Since this was speedy deleted, you should appeal to User:Shirt58 who last deleted it. Perhaps it can be treated as a softdelete and could be put back as a draft. (Articles for deletion/Konstant Infosolutions) as there seems to be no support for the proposal to delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Konstant Infosolutions (2)
Page contains all the required citations and references that were asked at the time of previous deletion. The page is all genuine now. I hereby take the responsibility that the content on the page is all unique and genuine. -Manishjain03 (talk) 12:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Shirt58 can you help me out of this?
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Konstant Infosolutions, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Julian hasn't been on for a few days, but offhand I don't see where the sources would overcome the issues at the AfD. You linked to people who work with the company, however this will not give Konstant Infosolutions notability as notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. The now deleted article also had issues with a promotional tone via sentences like "The Research and Development division, Mobile Labs, and Development Labs have unified the knowledge and proficiency from diverse domain professionals to provide the clients an expert advice on the best possible technological strategy." What you need are things like news articles written about the company. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * A draft might be possible. I also see that you requested this above - you just need to wait for Shirt to respond to that request. Opening new ones are unnecessary as long as the prior request is still open, which it is. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:04, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


 * This is a duplicate request, now answered twice. I think that's sufficient. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Robert "Bad Bob" Salerno

Creating Draft:Robert "Bad Bob" Salerno
Robert Salerno was recently inducted into the U.S. Ski and Snowboarding Hall of Fame. This qualifies him as a public figure and worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. -Macxprt (talk) 22:50, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Rick G. Nelson
''I, Jessemansfield2014, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jessemansfield2014 (talk) 23:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Zanata (Software)
''I, Dychen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dychen (talk) 04:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC) It looks like this was repeatedly declined as promotional and for lacking sourcing. I have no true issue with restoring it, but I'd feel better knowing that you had more coverage than what was present before the article was deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd originally had a link to the speedy deletion wikia, but the link had an out of date version of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * What you need to establish notability would be things like articles written about the software in a reliable place and by someone who is unaffiliated with the product. The biggest issue source-wise with the article was that you didn't really seem to have any that satisfied both requirements. You had links to official pages, to clients, and to places that wouldn't really be seen as a RS on Wikipedia, like self-published sources. There were also links that looked like they were heavily based on press releases. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:54, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * For example, this is so brief that it wouldn't be considered a RS even if it didn't read like it was heavily based on a press release. This is a WP:PRIMARY source and cannot establish notability - and I must state in general that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by the software having an association with any notable software, people, projects, or groups. The only one that looked usable was the stuff by Opensource.com, however a look at the article for the software shows that it was developed by Red Hat, who supports Opensource.com. This means that it's well within their best interests to write about something that they created, even if the software is open source. You need stuff that is written by someone uninvolved with the software. Wikis, how to guides, and the like also cannot be used. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CarVDB.com
''I, CarVehicleDB, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' CarVehicleDB (talk) 08:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

The page was not submitted for review on time. I wish do edit the page and submit it again. -CarVehicleDB (talk) 08:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)


 * , it was a 1-line article that was somewhat promotional too. It would be best to start from scratch. Please go to WP:CHU/Simple and change your username first, to something that represents only you as an individual. Companies or websites aren't permitted to have user accounts. Only you as an individual may have an account. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Fred F. Nazem
Leigh Herzog (talk) 14:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Meghan Douglas
retrieving prod -Prisencolin (talk) 19:20, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ because, apart from one sentence "Meghan Douglas was one of the world's top fashion models in the 1990s", the whole thing was a copyvio of her IMDb page. You would need to find better sources anyway. JohnCD (talk) 20:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

__NOINDEX__