Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 251

Amanda Seales
Original page apparently was removed because of lack of notability and uncontested - there are numerous sources with regards to the subject, and notability of subject may have become more pronounced within the last year, since previous deletion. I was going to create a page for this subject but then I saw a previous page existed, but I'm not privy to the actual content of that page and would like to reinstate that article and write it out with new content as needed. -Santagati (talk) 09:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute.


 * It looks as though you will be basically starting from scratch and building on your sources, though you may find something useful in its long history: it was started in 2008, and in 2012 it was built up, apparently by the subject herself, into over 15kb of autobiographical puffery; then the unsourced and spammy bits were cut back until practically nothing remained. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Westmoreland Club
Contested PROD cannot be deleted without AFD -Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 15:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Um, that was not a PROD but an A7, so X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I have undeleted it and Afd'ed it. Thanks. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Thomas Jack (DJ)
Very notable musician, a pioneer in a genre. Unfortunately, the article was created by a banned user which was the only reason for its deletion yet I believe that's not a wise reason to delete it. - - John Dane Benelli (talk) 10:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: The article was created by a sockpuppet of a banned user, and existed for only a day. The fact that this request comes immediately afterward from a recently dormant account is suspicious. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Checkuser confirms that the requester here is indeed that banned user. It's too bad; he should devote some energy to getting his original account unblocked, because he does good work. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:50, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Dj Kanji
{{subst:refund|1= Dj Kanji |2= I believe the page under the name Dj Kanji was deleted by mistake and as per my view Dj Kanji is a public figure in Kenya, he is one of the Promising rising star at the moment, I would request the restoration of Dj Kanji page. Please. regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akala92 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Dj Kanji was deleted as A7 (no significance first) and then G7 (blanked by author), but this will specifically need to focus with independent in-depth third-party news about him, and not press releases, trivial passing mentions or interviews. Wikipedia is not a social media or job listing. SwisterTwister   talk  22:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kajsa Hallberg Adu
''I, Kajsaha, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Kajsaha (talk) 13:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC) Kajsaha (talk) 13:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Chuka Eni
''I, Revzp84, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Revzp84 (talk) 21:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Arif Ahmed Photography
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Chaitifashion (talk) 21:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Planned presidential transition of Hillary Clinton
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -2601:647:200:6418:3145:9A65:F58B:60CF (talk) 04:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I have declined the speedy delete on Planned presidential transition of Hillary Clinton. You could have done that yourself, the article was not deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Brian Sommer
PROD deletion -Prisencolin (talk) 02:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. This could possibly be deleted with A7 too, so if you can improve it, please do so. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Tripoto
''I, Srvkumar09, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Srvkumar09 (talk) 08:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Please restore my friend's page
Please restore Renamed user henga2423's page he told me to get it restored. -Social Network (talk) 17:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC) Social Network (talk)
 * X mark.svg Not done The page I think they are talking about is at User:Krimuk90/List of films and television series seen. The page is not a draft article or in any way is an improvement to the encyclopedia.  Wikipedia is not the place to host personal ratings of movies and actors.  -- GB fan 17:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Please can restore my friends user page
Please restore my friends userpage he told me to do which previously on the name of User:Krimuk90 and he also wanted to restore his films seen list. -Social Network (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done If wants the user page back they need to log in and ask.  -- GB fan 18:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Obijackson Group
The Obijackson Group is a notable company based in Nigeria. It is a major player in the country's oil industry and engages in a number philanthropic activities. The purpose of creating the page was to ensure that a company of its size and significance has a Wikipedia page -Anders.brage (talk) 12:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Advertising is quite rarely ever restored simply because it's not what Wikipedia publishes, therefore simply because it's supposedly a known company in Nigeria is not an automatic inheritance of notability here; for a company, an article needs actual in-depth third-party news, but absolutely no PR or anything published by the company itself. Wikipedia is not a PR webhost or business listing. SwisterTwister   talk  21:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Achraf Baznani
Notable and visible artist -105.158.8.244 (talk) 16:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The article itself was deleted for having advertising and then no significance, you need to explain why and how the subject is in fact notable, such as if there are major independent news, and nothing that is PR or authored by him. SwisterTwister   talk  21:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Humbert Wolfe.jpg
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -2.102.44.14 (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

The image was given to my mother by Humbert Wolfe's daughter (Ann Wolfe - now deceased) and then to me. It is out of copyright and Humbert's daughter would want it to be put on wikipedia.


 * . The image was tagged as PD-old, which requires that 100 years have passed since the photographer's death. Are you confident that this is the case? If it is not the case, then the claim in the image page that "Anthony Padgett allows the photograph to be used publicly and royalty free" needs to be established by legitimate means, not by a random unidentifiable user stating it on the image page. Please see WP:CONSENT for guidance on releasing the image under an acceptable free license, if it doesn't qualify as public domain. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:13, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

User:Renamed user henga2423/List of films and television series seen
He wanted to restore this page because it was the part of his userpage and previously administrators didn't have any objection in retaining it. -Social Network (talk) 17:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done I will say it again, User:Krimuk90/List of films and television series seen. The page is not a draft article or in any way is an improvement to the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the place to host personal ratings of movies and actors.  If  wants the page back they need to log in and explain why they want it back.  -- GB fan 18:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I think that they're evading a block, considering that they're asking for his stuff back and they're trying to mess around with Renamed user henga2423's information again - something that Krimuk90 did as well. I'm going to ping  so he can be aware of this, but I'll go block Social Network for block evasion. Even if this is a friend, it's still block evasion in some form of fashion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It's a bit of a tricky situation - apparently the original Krimuk90 changed usernames at some point in the past and a vandal usurped the old username and used it to cause mischief. I've changed the block from a sockpuppet to something else since it seems like they might be trying to make the original Krimuk90 look bad through stuff like this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Youth For Seva
This an NGO to which I donate my time to as a volunteer and I would very much like your feedback or review on how can I make it meet wikipedia norms and put this page back on wiki -) 16:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Copy paste violations and advertising are never restored so this will not happen. Also, there was also no means of significance; simply because you work as a volunteer is not automatically making it acceptable; and if it's notable, it would need actual in-depth third-party news sources overall, and nothing the group authored or published itself. SwisterTwister   talk  21:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for that feedback, let me change my game strategy and get back to it User:devchander —Preceding undated comment added 06:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Truck Ads
''I, Rodoharris, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' I would like to correct and update information on this page to describe TRUCK ADS business information and 20 years of history. Rodoharris (talk) 23:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * That article was already restored once by your request in January, with the understanding that you would work on it. That didn't happen, you did nothing. We don't host unsuitable content indefinitely, so I hope you understand the reluctance to restore this draft yet again. What assurance can you provide that the article will be brought up to publishable standards this time? ~Anachronist (talk) 02:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, noting with this, note that Wikipedia is not a business listing so simply adding "business information and 20 years history" is not what automatically gets an article expected; instead, it needs actual in-depth third-party news, and no press releases, trivial passing mentions, interviews or news about their own activities, funding, partnerships or financing. SwisterTwister   talk  03:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I had a major setback in my life that limited my activity. I would like to try to create this article now and will keep working on it. I think I understand what is required better now then when I tried doing this the first time. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodoharris (talk • contribs) 07:00, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Peter C Bartels
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ac4041 (talk) 05:34, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

i am working on the page and need more time

thanks
 * It's not deleted yet. If you spent the time writing the content on Peter C Bartels instead of asking here, perhaps it would not be eligible for speedy deletion.  However if it is deleted you have not lost much.  Remember to save your work every few minutes to avoid edit conflicts or other problems. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:07, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It's deleted now. I suggest you create the article in draft space, like Draft:Peter C Bartels, instead of creating it in main space. Then you will have time to work on it without worrying about it being deleted quickly. Main space articles should have a semblance of completeness. Yours just had two words. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Hector_Delgado_(record_producer)
Why Was my page deleted ? Im the person the page was about. If you need me to verify something let me know and then click the "Save page" button below -AsapOffice (talk) 20:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Hector Delgado (record producer), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Ken The Rapper
New to creating wiki and then click the "Save page" button below -MoonlightEdits (talk) 21:54, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * First this was deleted because it had no claims of significance, and Wikipedia is not a job listing or social media, certainly not for every single rapper; therefore, for an acceptable article, we need independent news articles about him, and nothing PR or something he published himself. If these are not available, he's not notable. SwisterTwister   talk  22:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Furthermore, articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD are ineligible for restoration by request on this page. So, . Try again at WP:AFC, OK? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Thomas Jack (DJ) 2nd request
The page was originally speedy deleted (G5) because of its creation by me, a former blocked user using one of my former sockpuppets. I am no longer a blocked user or in violation of G5. Therefore, I would like to request the page be reinstated to mainspace please. - - TheMagnificentist (talk) 06:06, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. I deleted that page in accordance with WP:CSD. Congratulations on being unblocked. There's no longer any reason to keep it deleted, and you did a good job on that article, so I have restored it. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Nora En Pure
The page was originally speedy deleted (G5) because of its creation by me, a former blocked user using one of my former sockpuppets. I am no longer a blocked user or in violation of G5. Therefore, I would like to request the page be reinstated to mainspace please. - - TheMagnificentist (talk) 06:06, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done ~Anachronist (talk) 06:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Aleksandar Vukmirovic
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Baatarzorig (talk) 07:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Isu Okeke
''I, Okekezi Kamalu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Okekezi Kamalu (talk) 14:54, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

The page was deleted because it was unedited for more than 6 months. I want it to be undeleted because I'm willing to work assiduously towards improving its content. -Okekezi Kamalu (talk) 15:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Babar Malik
43.245.9.172 (talk) 05:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Mika Simmons
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alabama73 (talk) 12:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Spiderwebssweden.jpg
This image should be undeleted and then reused in Spiderwebs (song) to replace the US promo CD. This image is of the Swedish commercial CD release. -George Ho (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. Please make sure the image is used in an article before it gets deleted again for non-use. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Erin Parish
''I, KlacTer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' KlacTer (talk) 19:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Washington DC Leukemia Ball
''I, Chrismoss8713, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Chrismoss8713 (talk) 22:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Chrismoss8713 (talk) 22:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Draft:Washington DC Leukemia Ball is currently not deleted. SwisterTwister   talk  22:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example
Saidlear (talk) 22:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Draft:Ailbhe O'Monachain (1889-1967) restored Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Andre Julian
The article conforms to Wikipedia's core policies: NPOV, V and NOR. Regarding the 4th policy of notability, within Wikipedia notability is an inclusion criterion based on the encyclopedic suitability of an article topic. As such, if someone wishes to access background information on an "Andre Julian" that they had just seen on television, it is perfectly reasonable that honest and factual information be available for that person on Wiki. Thus the article on Andre Julian shows encyclopedic suitability, in conformance with Wiki's charter - to compile and provide trustworthy information on everything. -SuicideKing333 (talk) 00:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Andre Julian (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, to note, simply because he may an important businessman in his career and field is not an automatic acceptance here, and the article itself was still deleted because of existing advertising concerns and the comments there concurred with it, therefore there was consensus to delete. "if someone wishes to access background information on an "Andre Julian after they saw him on TV", we're not IMDb so we're not a profile listing for every single person, regardless of. SwisterTwister   talk  03:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Maynard Shipley
I believe this person is notable, and before i write a new article, i would like to inspect the one that was deleted before writing a new one. This is the husband of Miriam deFord, and wrote 33 of the Little Blue Books. There is more info here and here. If possible, please restore it to User:Generic hipster/Maynard Shipley so that i may work on it there. It was deleted December 24, 2007 with the rationale "(CSD A7(Bio): Biographical article that does not assert significance)". Sincere thanks. :) -generic_hipster 02:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Generic hipster/Maynard Shipley. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:59, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

2016–17 Star Hotshots season
I suppose the deleting of this page was a mistake. It was deleted for it was a "hoax", but actually it is not. It is the season's page of the team Star Hotshots. There was this, who keeps vandalizing pages related to Star Hotshots, like the Template:Star Hotshots roster. So I think the admin made a mistake in deleting the page for reverting the edits and protecting the page is enough. -''' Baby  miss  fortune ''' 03:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Correction, User:Fredmak2016 actually did not edit this deleted page, but only the template one. The page is legitimate and not a hoax. Baby miss fortune 03:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * In the case of speedy deletes like this we should ask the deleting admin User:RHaworth why it was deleted as a hoax, and to restore it. I cannot see why it was a hoax either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

List of Stanley Cup Finals broadcasters
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -A.lanzetta (talk) 04:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Ymblanter was the one to actually delete. There was also a redirect to Stanley Cup Finals if you think that is worthwhile to recreate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Wind Powered Ships
''I, 128.82.34.248, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 128.82.34.248 (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This was deleted twice because of no activities made in that time. Also, why "i need it for today"? Is it only for a one-time use or will it have lasting improvements or changes? Also, the contents can be emailed to you if you start an article, if needed. SwisterTwister   talk  20:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I am going to assume this was an intended school project. Has your teacher co-ordinated with WP:School and university projects? — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

I need it for today -128.82.34.248 (talk) 19:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This is an essay, not an encyclopedia article, and not suitable for publication. You also haven't explained why, in spite of being restored once before by request, no improvements were made since then. We are reluctant to restore it again. Wikipedia isn't a place for indefinite hosting of unsuitable material. If you have an account here, the essay can be emailed to you. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Paul Lauer
''I, Erikplauer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Erikplauer (talk) 23:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Agna Devi
She is one of the most famous photographers and fetish fashion designers of Russia Interview for Playboy - russian version. Also this press links, ,. She Makes costumes for Bianca Beauchamp and other famous fetish-models. She also works as a decorator of horror films -Vishap (talk) 15:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This was deleted because of having no actual claims of significance thus it would not benefit from restoring, also the links you've listed above are literally self-interviews and indie blogs interviewing her, none of that is what's needed for an acceptable article, so unless that's the best available, it would surely be deleted for both having no significance once again and also advertising. SwisterTwister   talk  18:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Please restore this article as a draft --Vishap (talk) 03:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * . It was nominated for deletion as unambiguous promotion, and deleted as non-notable. The article would have to be re-worked entirely, so you may as well start afresh in draft space. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

User:Kironide/Cooking
I would like to undelete this page and all of its subsidiary pages (linked at the page itself). These pages were deleted under CSD U5, but I was not notified of this before the deletion. I would like to grab the content (because I spent hours working on it), after which I will request re-deletion of the pages. -Kironide (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I have already noted that I would email you the content. It was entirely unrelated to Wikipedia.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 00:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * All of the copies of online recipes hosted in the deleted pages have now been emailed to Kironide.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 00:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pika Energy
''I, Folded pegasus, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Folded pegasus (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for taking so long to edit my page! We're all pretty busy here at Pika and it just slipped though the cracks. We have renewed interest in getting our page up to describe our advances in DC nanogrid technology and would like to have out draft un-deleted. Thanks! -Folded pegasus (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * as the deleting admin. Also note the above statements that suggest a significant Conflict of interest (We're all pretty busy here at Pika... describe our advances in DC nanogrid). Hasteur (talk) 20:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * On the other hand WP:AFC is the correct venue for a COI editor to make contributions.
 * you agreed to disclose your conflict of interest according to the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use when you created your account. Please put the tag on your user page. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I have some concern over the term "we" and "our", which gives off the impression that this is a shared account. The article was also slightly promotional, but not so much that I wouldn't restore it. (The promotional tones would need to be cleaned up, though.) The shared account issue is the biggest concern though - is this a shared account? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:55, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Eastbound Strangler
why was this deleted? -TeeVeeed (talk) 21:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * because the author of that article requested that it be deleted, in accordance with WP:CSD. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the answer, but now the topic is gone and it had links to other articles as well.TeeVeeed (talk) 00:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you wish this to be restored? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you to everyone for your attention and help.TeeVeeed (talk) 11:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Fake Democracy
fake democracy is unexeptional defination at the global level, i have defined the fake democracy with the structure of flow charts -Syed Muneer Hussain Shah 13:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Article has not yet been deleted--it is currently at AfD at Articles for deletion/Fake Democracy‎. -- Finngall  talk  15:14, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Update: Article was WP:SNOW deleted. -- Finngall  talk  21:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Hernandez
''I, 68.126.88.166, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 68.126.88.166 (talk) 21:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * . This is a malformed request. It wasdn't deleted under WP:CSD, it was deleted under WP:CSD, re-created, and then re-deleted at the author's request because apparently the content of the article had some incorrect assertions that may have originated from sources. It wouldn't be eligible for restoration here, but you are welcome to start over. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Future years
I have created this in December 2014, which was then deleted by RHaworth as a test page. However, years from 2063 to 2089 already have articles now, and now I would like the page to be restored to userspace, where WP:CSD does not apply, at User:GeoffreyT2000/Future years. - GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 17:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Large Art Company
''I, LargeArtCompany, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' LargeArtCompany (talk) 01:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

{{subst:refund|1= The Large Art Company |2= I had an assistant working on this and she left. If the draft she started is still around I would like to start again with that instead of starting over — Preceding unsigned comment added by LargeArtCompany (talk • contribs) 01:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * First {{yo|LargeArtCompany}} I will suggest that you ask for a new username at WP:CHU. User names must represent an individual, not a company. Secondly user names must not be shared by more than one person. Thirdly the submission was like an advertisement. So a page will have to be rewritten from scratch, even if notability can be shown.  Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aviva Directory
''I, ObadiahKatz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' ObadiahKatz (talk) 01:23, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The only deleted page I see from you is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aviva Directory, is that what you want? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Large Art Company
''I, 73.172.58.84, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 73.172.58.84 (talk) 01:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * See below, as I have restored the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Bernie or Bust
Several users have argued over at Articles for deletion/Never Hillary about the Bernie or Bust campaign being more significant than the Never Hillary movement, and therefore deserving its own stand-alone article. The article has been deleted (merged) relatively early in the election cycle (August 1). Since then, the Bernie or Bust movement has received significant coverage and has been accredited with contributing to Clinton's loss in the general election. So this is worth a revisit. As it stands, the Bernie or Bust movement is virtually non-existent on Wikipedia and is not even mentioned in the article it is currently redirected to. It seems like there's larger systemic issues here at play. A sort of Damnatio memoriae, if you will. -Étienne Dolet (talk) 05:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like there was an AfD for this back in August, where it received a non-admin close from . I think that the main thing you'll have to show right now is how the coverage for this campaign received more coverage after August and how the article could be expanded from this version. I'd recommend working on a version in your userspace first before trying to restore the article, as having a good final product is usually the best way to argue against past AfDs, especially since there's a similar AfD currently in place for the Never Hillary campaign. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * As said, significant, third party reliable sources need to show improved coverage and notability past the August AfD date.  You said there is no mention of "Bernie or Bust" in the article it is redirected to, however it is mentioned in the Campaign section of that article.  The pieces you linked to are based in more opinion than fact so it is my belief that they would not improve the article alone to pass another AfD. -- Dane 2007  talk  07:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Alright, and . I did work on it a bit (here). It's a work in progress. Obviously, I can't do everything on my own, so I'm hoping when the article is restored, there can be more users who can work collaboratively in making it better. So I think it's worth another shot. I also don't mind if it immediately heads to another AfD. Lots of things have changed since August 1, and the Wikipedia community should be able to reassess the article at least one more time since that date. Étienne Dolet (talk) 08:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Alright, and . Can you guys check out my draft? I think it's good to go. There's always room for improvement, but it should be good enough for a second try. Étienne Dolet (talk) 21:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:43S preinitiation complex
''I, 171.66.213.131, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 171.66.213.131 (talk) 00:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Downtown by Petula Clark UK vinyl A-side.jpg
I changed the status to free but not transferable to Commons. The revisions should be undeleted. -George Ho (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * By now you have probably worked out that I do not think this is PD-simple. Is there an essay or policy page that talks about the copyright of the appearance of a record label? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I found File:PyeLogo.JPG, but I don't think it's original enough to be copyrightable in the US. I'm planning to change it to free but not for Commons. I found WP:logos, which doesn't say much about non-US logos. The essay WP:Logo Copyright/Trademark might not say much either. Non-U.S. copyrights discusses foreign works but not much about logos. --George Ho (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, Graeme, here is c:COM:TOO. --George Ho (talk) 07:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Nano Server
Nano Server : posted by User talk:Psaajid


 * This page is not deleted but redirects to a section Windows_Server_2016. You are able to edit this, or expand on what was at the recirect .  However do not copy and paste text from Microsoft Technet.  I have removed the posting here as it is a copyright infringement. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

DR RAI MUHAMMAD AMMAR MADNI
DR RAI MUHAMMAD AMMAR MADNI is the real and official page of one of our doctor working under us, we are contributing to wikipedia on this , and making our members officially on internet. it contains no abuses, no copyright content. plz fix it, so that we should proceed to other page. and should not be suspended in single page. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctorsofyear (talk • contribs) 12:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ Wikipedia is not a place to promote a doctor. Any new content you write and submit here is copyrighted. Linkedin is more intended to record people's work. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/i said yes (band)
''I, Hughbarne, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Hughbarne (talk) 20:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gustavo Mas
''I, Dmorales737, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dmorales737 (talk) 03:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Leanplum
A new version of this page, located here, was recently rejected because the deleted version was not available for comparison. The editor requested access to the deleted page. The content has changed significantly since the original page was deleted, and I would like to re-submit the new draft. The new article has citations from several news outlets on the company's history, funding, and research publications. Many of these citations help prove notability and were not present in the old page. -99.242.186.247 (talk) 19:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Text of deleted article restored, at Draft talk:Leanplum. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Nintendo eShop
''I, 79.74.99.116, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 79.74.99.116 (talk) 12:07, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Apologies, wasn't signed in when I requested this - it's something I intend to continue developing for resubmission, but unfortunately I haven't had time for a while. If it can be restored, I would be sure to make time to update and resubmit this for consideration over the next month or two. Regards, Jack talk 20:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

User:Krimuk90/List of films and television series seen
Please undelete my page -117.197.139.51 (talk) 07:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Why? And how is it 'your' page? The page belonged to Krimuk90, it was apparently created by someone else, and we have no way of knowing that the IP address 117.197.139.51 requesting is either person. Furthermore, the page consists of nothing but personal opinions about movies, and isn't related to the Wikipedia project. Wikipedia isn't a hosting service for indiscriminate collections of information that will never become a Wikipedia article. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Trust me its my page and i want to restore it because i want to show this list my co-friends on wikipedia.
 * Please Restore it is a humble request.
 * Please!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.89.95.208 (talk) 07:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * A similar request was declined here: Requests for undeletion/Archive 251 Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * . Repeating what was said previously: The page is not a draft article or in any way is an improvement to the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the place to host personal ratings of movies and actors. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Pyongyang Sunan International Airport logo.png
Non-free file with legitimate use in Pyongyang Sunan International Airport. It was deleted as unused (F5) when it was replaced with a version from Commons that was subsequently deleted as material unsuitable for Commons (non-free). - – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:MondoCon
''I, Count3D, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Count3D (talk) 09:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:P. M. de Respour
''I, (don't talk secrets), request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' (don&#39;t talk secrets) (talk) 09:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! (don&#39;t talk secrets) (talk) 10:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Aboobacker Amani
Aboobacker Amani is notable personality, please check search results on Google and Yahoo. -137.97.93.87 (talk) 10:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:SAFID
''I, HOgilvy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' HOgilvy (talk) 11:20, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Sheikh Hamza Ahmed
Why deleted without any reason? -137.97.107.203 (talk) 14:03, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This was deleted for both Advertising and Copypaste Violations and thus will not be restored. Please see WP:What Wikipedia is not. SwisterTwister   talk  18:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

__NOINDEX__