Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 255

List of township-level divisions of Ningxia
I was hoping to continue working on that instead of having to start from scratch. Draft please. :) -Fadinga (talk) 11:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. see draft:List of township-level divisions of Ningxia Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

List of township-level divisions of Inner Mongolia
I was hoping to continue working on it instead of starting from scratch. Can it be a draft? -Fadinga (talk) 11:07, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done see Draft:List of township-level divisions of Inner Mongolia Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International University of Technology Twintech Yemen
''I, MogeebMosleh, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' MogeebMosleh (talk) 19:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Voice of Gujarat
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dev gadhvi (talk) 09:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC) This page should not get deleted. This page provided their website, facebook page, Twitter ID to authenticate. Wkipedia can't be such strict because it discourage their users to go to wikipedia profile.
 * ❌ Wikipedia is not a social media site for profiles. It is also not for advertising. If there are reliable independent sources for the topic, then I suggest you start again at Draft:Voice of Gujarat and use WP:AFC to see if it is ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Devender Singh Dahiya
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Devender Singh Dahiya (talk) 12:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The page was deleted because it looked like you were using it as social media profile, Linkedin page, or as a WP:WEBHOST. Users can have some info about themselves on their user page, but it should pertain to yourself as far as editing on Wikipedia goes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:57, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Peter Paul Ciantar
The person in question has recently been awarded the Order of Merit of the Maltese republic. -Micmalti (talk) 16:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * {subst:UND -Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Aarbind Jena
No reasoning given. -Aarbind Jena 07:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Normally we restore PRODs, but it was proposed for deletion with the rationale "Concerns with notability, and reads like an autobiography and/or advert." I'm also concerned that this is an autobiography, meaning that it was something that you wrote about yourself. Wikipedia strongly discourages people writing about themselves, as it's so easy to make something promotional or to see notability where there might not be any. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I also note that there seems to be quite a few accounts associated with this person/page and it looks like they might all be run by the same person. I'm going to open a SPI on this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done I didn't open the SPI since the other accounts were all stale, so I blocked one account that was definitely tied to this account and put a template on one that looks like it might be related, but there's not enough to entirely say that it's a sockpuppet. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Asynchronous procedure call
I have material about this subject and I want to restore the article. It was deleted by speedy deletion criterion G12 (unambiguous copyright infringement). -Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 22:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Copyright violations will not be restored —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 22:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ Which means that you should start writing again from scratch. It was a copy of http:// www .asyncop.com/MTnPDirEnum.aspx?treeviewPath=%5Bd%5D+Tutorial%5C%5Ba%5D+Multiprocessing+Traps+%26+Pitfalls%5C%5Bb%5D+Synchronization+API%5C%5Bh%5D+APC if you want to include that as a source. Anyway the style was wrong, so even more reason to write in original encyclopedic tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Oh No Oh My
This appears to have been deleted based on an expired PROD based on alleged Notability concerns. In fact, the band meets WP:NMUSIC requirements 1, 4, and 10. The band's albums were reviewed by several music sites including Pitchfork and the AV Club, has toured nationally and internationally (with non-trivial coverage), and had a song featured in the TV series "Weeds". Some of the band's album pages still exist (with references). - &mdash;Torc.  ( Talk. ) 12:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Hip-Hop AW (2016)
Hip-Hop AW is a Hip Hop Album. -AW (talk) 11:52, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * There's no existing page by this name. SwisterTwister   talk  22:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ The page was called Hip Hop AW, but it only consisted of an infobox with no claim of importance, and no article for the performer. I suppose the performer may have been AW Bhai which was also speedy deleted with A7. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

California Review
As you can see in the discussion there were no grounds for deletion of the wikipedia article; the discussion was in the favor of keeping the page. Additionally, the page did not violate any wikipedia standards following the proposal of deletion. The author of the deletion proposal has pushed forward over the years several times in attempts to delete the article. The collegiate newspaper has a notable history and has long been in the public arena in the Southern California area as seen in the sources for the page from NBC News, the ACLU, FIRE, San Diego Tribune, National Review, interviewed the likes of Milton Friedman, Jack Kemp, Pete Wilson, Ron Paul and many more. -Ptariche (talk) 04:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/California Review (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

BookMyShow
--Sumitsinha lko (talk) 19:51, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Before I created this page today it was already deleted. I checked the reasons for deletion and carefully wrote a short stub with infobox etc. I never wrote it as any kind of promotion or ad.
 * Some more references could be added, I agree. I was in the process to obtain more and add them.
 * Now I see that User:Ad Orientem has deleted it without caring to raise a discussion in the talk page of the article or with me (writer). I find his actions to be non democratic and autocratic. I propose to put an enquiry on him/her.
 * Kindly get the deletion reverted. I invite any party who is against creation of this article to discuss on the article talk page.
 * Your request to have the above article undeleted cannot be acted on here because it was deleted first via an AfD discussion. See Articles for deletion/Bookmyshow. Please go to WP:DRV if you wish to contest the AfD. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * And the most recent deletion is an A7 (no indication of notability) deletion, which likewise is not restored here. Whether the deletion was "democratic" or not isn't relevant. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks to both of you. I have followed your instructions and raised a discussion here Deletion_review --Sumitsinha lko (talk) 06:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:San_Jose_Inside
''I, Metronews, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Metronews (talk) 08:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC) ''Thanks, Tokyogirl79, for the reply to my request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. I’ll watch for its return this time. Sorry for falling asleep at the switch, and thanks for the cautionary note about providing a disclaimer.'' Metronews (talk) 16:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Metronews Metronews (talk) 16:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like you made a request back in December 2014 and it was restored by myself, but no edits were made. Looking at your username, I'm mildly concerned that it poses an issue since it implies that it is tied to the topic (San Jose Inside), a news website. You've been editing since 2008 and on various different topics, but I would be somewhat remiss if I didn't mention that. If you're related to any of the news websites/outlets you do have to mention this ala WP:COI, but if you're not it might not be a bad idea to put a little disclaimer somewhere, yadda yadda. Anywho, my main concern is whether or not you'll edit this if I restore it a second time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Gammadyne Mailer
An admin had deleted the article, then restored it so that it could be reworked and debated. The article was largely rewritten to resolve some issues. No one ever argued that it should be deleted on the talk page. It was soon after deleted by another admin. This article is notable enough to be referenced by two other articles, and should therefore be restored. At the very least, it needs to go through a proper debate process. -Grozo (talk) 00:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This was deleted 2 weeks ago as a community consensus and those cannot be restored by a simple request. SwisterTwister   talk  05:34, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * What consensus? No one was in favor of deletion on the talk page.  Grozo (talk) 04:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * See Articles for deletion/Gammadyne Mailer. Two people requested deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Those requests for deletion were made before the article was undeleted and rewritten. Grozo (talk) 17:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:José A. Bittencourt
''I, Jose Augusto Bittencourt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jose Augusto Bittencourt (talk) 13:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:John J. Vincent (theologian)
''I, Ianlucraft, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ianlucraft (talk) 14:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Aneptunelogon.gif
Non-free image mistakenly "moved" to Commons and deleted. Requesting undeletion for use at Microsoft Neptune. (This is the second time I'm requesting this here – my previous request was simply ignored and archived!) -Mdrnpndr (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

North County Property Group
Bobpreston2012 (talk) 18:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The page is not deleted, so nothing to restore here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Riyan Swat
The one and only one Riyan Khan and then click the "Save page" button below -Riyanswt (talk) 05:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No, because Wikipedia is not Facebook. SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Model Combat
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -76.2.241.87 (talk) 04:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Participant evolution
Please restore to draft space. -Fixuture (talk) 01:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It was deleted at AfD, so you'd have to ask if he is willing to restore it to the draftspace or is OK with someone else doing this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Why wouldn't he? Are the rules for undeletion different when an article got deleted at AfD? Btw while I don't think the deletion discussion found even rough consensus for a delete I'm not intending to restore it to mainspace as a stand-alone article. Are you willing to? --Fixuture (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The consensus was clearly and unambiguously for delete. I have restored the article to Draft:Participant evolution. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Rules are different for AfDs when it comes to REFUND. The only time we can restore an AfD'd article is when the article was deleted via a WP:SOFTDELETE - which would have to be marked by the closing admin as a soft delete. Any other type of close marks it as something that cannot be restored through REFUND, as AfD'd articles can really only be restored via two avenues: the deleting admin can restore it (or give someone else permission to restore it) or it can be restored by making a petition to WP:DRV. The only catch with DRV is that you can only do this if the deleting admin refuses to restore the material. In other words, AfDs cannot be restored via REFUND per the below statement:
 * this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Participant evolution, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
 * I'm using the above article as the example for this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your explanations. First of all I think all articles (with exceptions) should be draftified or moved to userspace instead of getting outright deleted per default or as an option for the article creator (who needs to be made aware of this option) or at the request of other participants. Then this article just says "Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review" - but I do not wish to have the deletion reviewed as I don't intend to restore the article - and I did not know about this - so what you just told me here should probably be noted in a short (very short) manner at the top of the page.
 * However, instead of that the undeletion process should probably be improved in that requests for undeletion that request the undeletion of a page that got "hard deleted" by an admin notify said admin automatically (or unpreferably semi-automatically by guiding the requesteer to find out the name of the admin a ping him in the request or so) and there should be easy-to-choose options to have it restored to draft or userspace. It would probably need a wizard like the Dispute resolution noticeboard/request one for this.
 * --Fixuture (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)


 * It's discussed here somewhat with this section:
 *  This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.
 * However there has occasionally been some talk over that since it's a little vague. It would probably be better if it was more clear that it would only be restored in cases where there was no discussion at AfD (meaning no discussion for deletion other than the nominator), it was marked as a soft delete, and/or the admin clearly marks that restoration/userfication is an option. I don't know that automatic userfication/draftifying would really become a standard option for AfDs, given that there are so many articles that are so unsuitable for Wikipedia and in some cases would be unlikely to be properly maintained or edited. You could suggest it at the AfD talk page, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Spirit of the Rainforest: A Yanomamo Shaman's Story
I plan on editing further -HodgeBrad (talk) 02:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You requested that this be restored in March 2016 and made no edits to the page, so it was deleted as a stale draft. You made a new request for restoration back in September, where I asked for some sort of assurance that the page would be edited, however you never responded to that. This will not be restored unless you can give us some sort of very good assurance that it would not be abandoned again. Wikipedia is not a place to indefinitely host content. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I do think that the book would pass notability guidelines - especially given the criticism the work has received in places like this one, but we just need to make sure that this won't just become an abandoned draft. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Creative Planning, Inc.
''I, Jdewittks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jdewittks (talk) 19:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , you made a request for this to be restored in March 2016. It was restored, but you did not make any edits. What kind of assurance can you make us that this will be edited this time? Also, you need to disclose your conflict of interest here per WP:COI, which you have not done with any of the content you have made on Wikipedia - despite the fact that you have a very obvious COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * , please disregard my request. For COI reasons, it's not appropriate for me to create this page and it should remain deleted.  Thank you. Jdewittks 13:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Obra Architects
Hello, Deletion administrator, I'm quite new to wikipedia. I didn't know that deletion process can processed this quick. Please give me another chance to at least open up dicussion. username Nop, and comatmebro were very nice to guide me to create proper page not in intention with deletion. Thank you -J.seoul (talk) 15:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No, because it was both blatant advertising and overall misuse of Wikipedia in our policies. First, it would help to actually say if there's major substantial news (and not PR, please) about this subject, and if not, then it's not currently notable for us. Wikipedia is not a PR business webhost. SwisterTwister   talk  22:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * @ SwisterTwister Understood. Only requesting userfication (sp?) to retrieve for working on it or else otherwise altering etc. to meet Wikipedia standards in the future, if at all possible. Would you be able to help with this? I think I've requested in possible places but not certain. Not getting any answer.... Thanks regardless, J.seoul (talk) 16:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * In this case, starting anew is best and perhaps using only the suitable parts from before such as the general non-PR facts. SwisterTwister   talk  17:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Chef HD/sandbox
Due to schedule I was unable to continue working on it. I have someone helping me now and should be able to of finish.
 * Yes check.svg Done Κσυπ Cyp  20:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

BKZ (DGT) MUSIC MAKERS
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -BKZ enterteinment MUSIC MAKERS (talk) 11:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done A7+G11 Κσυπ Cyp  21:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Mansplaining
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -95.45.86.123 (talk) 18:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do. The article is not deleted and isn't being considered for deletion. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Talk:T. S. Aboobaker
I have moved T.S Aboobaker to T. S. Aboobaker so that G8 would no longer apply. Rich Farmbrough mistakenly moved only the talk page. The talk page should be undeleted just in case if the AfD gets closed as "keep". - Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 03:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅, talk page restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Overseas Security Advisory Council
Was deleted at this TfD with no participation for being orphaned. I would like to use it. Thank you. -Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅, template restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Software Collections
''I, Robert.kratky, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Robert.kratky (talk) 16:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * @Robert.kratky: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

DeviceKit
Article was PRODed for being non-notable and about a short-lived project only. The term, however, is referred to in enough places (including in WP) to deserve some coverage when people run into it. So we need either an article about it at its original place or a redirect to another suitable place. I ask for undeletion so that I can investigate if some or all of the original contents can be used for this. In either case, it is better to do this "on top" of the original article instead of creating a new one, also to preserve the original edit history. Thanks. -Matthiaspaul (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, the article is in a better shape than expected. It is, however, quite worrysome, that anonymous IPs can cause articles like this to be deleted with ease. It's clearly causing damage to the project. I also see that the PRODing was contested by another user as well, though formally incorrect on the article's talk page and hence overlooked by the deleting admin. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 17:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

why transformer not work in d.c.
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Akshara sri kannan (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC) why transformer not work in d.c.           I request you to undelete my article because i was so specific and clear in my reasons for the question claimed i.e.my article title. Thanking, Akshara sri kannan
 * No, because there's a currently existing article for that subject. SwisterTwister   talk  18:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ Read Transformer for the answer to the question. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:3rd Explosive Ordnance Battalion
''I, 21lima, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 21lima (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I missed something: when was it declined? --21lima (talk) 12:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * That was just a canned template message. Not all of it is relevant here, apparently. I see many deleted drafts that were never submitted for review, so probably our template reply should be modified to remove that phrase "when it was declined." I've just done that. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * In this case it was not eligible for g13, so restore was reversing an erroneous nomination and deletion. "d" option would do. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I did not know there was a review process. I just create them and move them to article space when I think they are ready enough. I also did not know there was a clock on this, but I can understand why. --21lima (talk) 23:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Alexander M. Korsunsky
''I, Md.ts.2015, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Md.ts.2015 (talk) 10:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Alexander M. Korsunsky
The topic of this page is still active, and there is a wish in the community to complete the publication of article on this topic. The article was deleted due to lack of activity that was an oversight on the part of the initiating author - this will be rectified by inviting multiple contributors -Md.ts.2015 (talk) 10:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There was no such page, but the draft is restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.svg
Please undelete the image, the file was originally uploaded under fair use for infobox use, but was deleted due to not being used for some period of time because the file was replaced by a version of the file erroneously uploaded in commons. No vector version of the file exists elsewhere. -Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

kiran G.nath
not a biography here and then click the "Save page" button below -Aaryadevikunjamma (talk) 09:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I have restored Kiran G. Nath, bur references must be added within a week to prevent deletion again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Riot Jazz Brass Band
''I, 2A02:C7D:2A06:3100:293B:FC4F:A309:106F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2A02:C7D:2A06:3100:293B:FC4F:A309:106F (talk) 14:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Κσυπ Cyp  15:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Uh, and undone again… Κσυπ Cyp  15:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mysore (Narayan book)
''I, Shagadelik, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Shagadelik (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Carbon_Tax_Now
''I, Amokri, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Amokri (talk) 19:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:William Smith, Jr.
{{subst:refund|1= Draft:William Smith, Jr. 2=I have a been unable to work on this article since last winter for several personal reasons. I intend to start working on this draft in the next few weeks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajacton (talk • contribs) 23:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:William Smith, Jr. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Grace French (artist)
''I, 2604:6000:1405:77:C92D:F155:1300:98CE, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2604:6000:1405:77:C92D:F155:1300:98CE (talk) 23:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Grow.com (company)
''I, Jjd13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jjd13 (talk) 22:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Penlite/sandbox/User:Penlite
''I, Penlite, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Penlite (talk) 01:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done But it was pointless and I have redirected to your user page, which was a copy. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Medicinal Plants In Australia
''I, Ringpicker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ringpicker (talk) 02:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Texans For Israel
''I, JamesSmithUT, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' JamesSmithUT (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Sundarna
Bharat546 (talk) 05:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Navajo and Hopi Settlement Act
Please userfy so that I can continue improving the article. - gobonobo + c 07:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Navajo and Hopi Settlement Act Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Paint (musical group)
''I, Jeepster33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jeepster33 (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This was restored in April 2016, but there were no improvements made. What assurance can you give that you will work on the draft? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 2 January 2017  (UTC)

apologies I didnt see the previous undelete confirmation. I will ammend and resubmit this month.

A letter to my land
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dawa Namgyal Sherpa (talk) 14:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Name is jarrah tree how could he/she delete my content. Does he/she hold that rights and if how
 * Wikipedia is not a poetry site, assuming the contents of this page are the same as what's on your user talk page. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ It was deleted by Edgar181 as it was a copy of http://sherpawhopause.blogspot.co.uk/ . Even if you wrote it, this is not what Wikipedia is for see WP:NOT. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dese'Rae L. Stage
Article not intentionally abandoned. Still doing research, but traveled extensively during the fall. -Girlrebelgirl (talk) 15:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Chairman (President) of the People's Republic of Bulgaria
''I, Kndimov, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Kndimov (talk) 15:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Paint (musical group)
''I, Jeepster33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jeepster33 (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * See the question above. T|His has been abandoned twice. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Frederic Lafargue
''I, Bellamorro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bellamorro (talk) 16:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ian Williams (comics artist)
81.97.233.93 (talk) 16:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:W.B. Law Coffee Co.
108.53.105.17 (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

CHRISTIAN SACCHINI
No claim is made to having played a professional soccer game, yet. A contract was signed in Nov. of 2016 for one year with the current swedish professional team assyriska ik -DJSACCHINI (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC) There will be a reference link to the  club's website/facebook page, in two weeks. Copy of contract is also available for review. Thank you.
 * We don't cite social media or proxies of the subject, and the contract is likewise of limited use as a source. Once he plays a game for a top-level team, then we can consider an article, not before. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 22:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Seth Ferranti
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Truth617 (talk) 00:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G10. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

X Social Group
This page should not be deleted because the content is just about the basic information and development of that company with a lot of resource materials support, it does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, and I don't know why the admin defined it as disruptive editing. -Jefferynghk (talk) 03:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Queer Comrades
''I, StijnD, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' StijnD (talk) 06:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * , it looks like you made a request for restoration back in April, but you didn't make any substantial edits to the article nor did you submit it for consideration at AfC. We need some sort of show that you will edit and submit the draft if we restore it a second time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Jane Kitto
116.212.247.8 (talk) 03:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Jane Kitto restore page for further editing

{{subst:^|Jane Kitto}
 * I can't see where there was any article by this name in the mainspace or draftspace. A search on the speedy deletion wikia and at AfD brought up nothing. We'd need a link in order to be able to tell you whether or not REFUND can help you with this. Something else to take into consideration is that we cannot restore articles deleted on other language Wikipedias, so if the page was created elsewhere then we cannot restore those articles. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:00, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Factom


My Response ---

I want this article to be undeleted bcoz of the reasons stated below.

The article was deleted due to copyright infrigement of two links

1. https://news.bitcoin.com/bill-melinda-gates-awards-grant-factom/

I dont know why the above link has been included in copyright infrigement. The link leads to a Site which is a News Site for Crypto related articles. And The Link clearly Mentions that a grant has been Given to Factom coompany which the wiki page belonged to. So this indeed is not a copyright violation.

2. https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/news/2016/06/17/st-awards-199k-austin-based-factom-inc-iot-systems-security

This Link also leads to a Government website which provided a grant to the Factom Company which the wiki page belonged to. So Copyright Violation on this link is also a flase Statement. You can personally check the Links and decide if it has some copyrighted Content.

Hence i request you to please Undelete the Page as It complies all the rules of Wikipedia. The copyright infrigement are just false Statements.

Regards, Jayesh. -Jay8291 (talk) 09:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

MODERATORS RESPONSE START


 * That is not how copyright works. At all. We do not allow users to copy-paste content wholesale from websites, full stop. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 11:06, 2 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Actually www.dhs.gov is public domain, so copying is permitted on Wikipedia from this site. However credit is required to avoid the false impression of who wrote it.  But you should ask the administrator that deleted it. Are you suggesting that there was no copying from the Bill and Melinda Gates story? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

MODERATROS RESPONSE END

My RESPONSE-

Well Nothing was Copied from any Articles. Only the link was posted in Reference Header for reference to the Funding received from the companies. Like Factom received received Funding from DHS so an Link was posted just for Reference. Same with Bill & Melinda Gates Article. How can just posting a Link for Reference became a Copyright Infrigement ??-Jay8291 (talk)
 * X mark.svg Not done We cannot restore copyright violations via REFUND. A quick search showed that the article had content copied from here, here, here, and here, and likely from other places. Now even if this wasn't a copyright violation the page was still very, very unambiguously promotional, to the point where it would be valid for speedy deletion under criteria WP:G11.
 * Now something else to take into consideration - even if the company has been given permission to use copyrighted materials that permission is not automatically extended to Wikipedia. In order for any content to be used the copyright holder would have to file a ticket that essentially gives up the material as fair use. I have to assume that in the case of the news article the company does not own the article outright (as the word grant gives off the permission that Factom can use the material for marketing purposes but does not own the material) and that the copyright belongs to the respective news website, who would have to file the ticket themselves - and most places are unlikely to want to do this. Even if they were willing, the content would still have to be re-written in order to be neutral.
 * This brings up a few new points. First off, Factom does not own the article on Wikipedia. (WP:OWNERSHIP) It isn't like a company website Linkedin or other database type sites where a company has complete creative control over the page and shouldn't be considered an extension of the company website. This brings up the final point - have you disclosed your conflict of interest? I haven't checked elsewhere just yet, but it seems obvious that you are a marketing person that has been asked to create the page. You can edit with a COI, but you must be transparent about this and you must follow Wikipedia's guidelines to a T. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)