Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 257

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tina Tambe
''I, Ashishtambe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ashishtambe 10:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Hiro-Media
Hello, My name is Yael, I work at HIRO Media and we noticed that our Wikipedia page was deleted as it was considered not notable nor neutral by editors and administrators. We would like to rewrite and edit the page so it will align with Wikipedia's guidelines. Can you please advise if the page can be restored for us to edit it? Or advise any other suggestion as to how can we restore the page? Appreciate your help in this matter. Regards-Yaelhiro (talk) 12:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Hiro-Media, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Acacia (series)
''I, Naushaad Gasieta, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' N. Gasieta (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Wahi Pandhi
''I, Rustamani Kashif, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rustamani Kashif (talk) 23:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Blackwater Sailing Club
''I, Psychetube, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Psychetube 11:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The draft was restored at your request last June, but was abandoned again. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Roxy Clevington
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Panther8181 (talk) 20:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Roxy Clevington is an amateur model based out of Las Vegas, NV. She has the Twitter handle @pumpforyou
 * No because none of it satisfies our policies and Wikipedia is not Facebook. SwisterTwister   talk  21:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * the article had no content in it, so it was not worth restoring. You may start a fresh one in draft space at Draft:Roxy Clevington if you believe she meets inclusion criteria spelled out in Notability (people).

Draft:Odoo Community Association
''I, 82.29.90.82, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 82.29.90.82 (talk) 07:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Xenia Belmas
''I, SHBCARE, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SHBCARE (talk) 09:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Benjamin Lambert
''I, HamiltonGrey, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' HamiltonGrey (talk) 13:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Threewave_Software
This was a legitimate game developer company which while it has appeared to have closed down and the website is just a holding page from it's more informative previous versions is still notable for their past contributions and history in its page(s) which I require information from and to reference to. Please undelete it, thank you. -165.225.80.104 (talk) 15:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Pulpit Freedom Sunday
''I, Gobonobo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' gobonobo  + c 15:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Protection of Civilians
157.150.193.1 (talk) 15:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Comparison of VPN providers
Suncatcher (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Draft:Comparison of VPN providers
 * this was restored before but no improvements were made. What do you plan to do? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Daniel Wattenberg
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -108.51.64.251 (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Wattenberg


 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. — ξ xplicit  02:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Roxy's Ruler
I have not had time to edit this draft since presenting an associated paper at the AAS summer conference in San Diego and it has been dormant for longer than 6 months. I have been really busy setting up a community building and astronomy program on a native reservation east of Calgary. It has been very successful but also very hectic. I now have time to continue the submission and complete the article. I am requesting that you undelete the page please and I will ensure that I make regular edits and additions so that it can be finished in a reasonable time.

Thank you -68.145.56.131 (talk) 01:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Russell Pedley
''I, Vitruvianman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' on receiving a note that the page was going to be deleted (no notice period given by 1989) when I visited the draft the same day it had already been deleted. I am currently receiving advice to improve the article Vitruvianman (talk) 21:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Hot for food blog
''I, Jaobar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to review it.'' Content should be in the mainspace, from what I recall Jaobar (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Jaobar, the page is fairly promotional, enough to where it could have qualified for G11 and would be deleted as such if it were in the mainspace. It would need a complete re-write to meet Wikipedia's WP:NPOV guidelines. An example of this can be seen as follows:
 * Both Lauren and John are established professionals within the music industry and live very busy and demanding lives, but recently resigning from Bell Media, Lauren can now focus her time on her hobbies and what truly inspires her: health.
 * The whole thing was essentially written in this tone and was also accompanied by a lot of hotlinks to the site's recipes, which at worst can be seen as promotion and at best is just WP:INDISCRIMINATE data about what they do - we rarely include individual recipes on an article about a cooking or food related person or website unless those recipes have received so much coverage that they would likely warrant their own articles. For example, you don't see a list of recipes in the article for Martha Stewart or the magazine Cooking Light. The article was also liberally sprinkled with content that can be seen as a WP:SOAPBOX for eating vegan. FWIW, I applaud people that can go vegan, as it takes a lot of willpower, but you need to be careful not to come across as promoting things on Wikipedia since in this case the article should be neutrally written and should only be about the blog itself.
 * Now that said, I don't mind e-mailing you a copy of the article so you can work on a new draft. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * It looks like you didn't write the original draft, a student did, but the warning about the content is still valid - it would need a pretty substantial re-write in order to meet NPOV guidelines. I wrote a bit of an essay about the differences between student papers and Wikipedia articles, as this is actually pretty common with student assignments. (User:Tokyogirl79/Academic papers vs Wikipedia articles) I'll send you an email. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Dear Tokyogirl79, thank you for your comments and for your email. I have re-reviewed the article, and while I agree that there are a few sentences that violate WP:NPOV, I disagree with your overall assessment that the entire piece is so promotional that it should quality for WP:G11. I would remove, for instance, some of the uncited text about cleaning products, and perhaps modify a bit of the language about the personal lives of the individuals mentioned (though the latter reads fairly consistent with the sort of thing you see in a celebrity's personal life section). It is my understanding that the most important strategies for ensuring content isn't promotional are: 1) being descriptive in a neutral way, and 2) citing multiple sources external to the entity being written about (i.e. WP:V and WP:N). It appears to me that the majority of the article satisfies the former and the works cited certainly satisfies the latter. While this isn't the best article I've seen produced in a class, I would argue that its benefits outweigh its shortcomings and for that reason should be reinstated. I will be happy to do so myself, making a few small modifications to satisfy WP:NPOV. What do you say? I should add that I appreciate you sharing your piece about argumentative writing v. encyclopedic writing. As someone that has taught with the WMF/WikiEd Education Program since 2010, while I'm always looking to improve, I am certainly familiar with the different styles of writing. Best, Jaobar (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * If you want to work on a new draft, feel free. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Odoo Community Association (2)
This page required more citations and I have been slow in getting them, now the page has been unchanged for 6 months and marked for speedy deletion. Can you userfy the page so I can have the content updated accordingly? -StuartJMackintosh (talk) 07:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Why? It was just undeleted (see a few sections above). The page has had some recent activity so it is not in danger of being deleted. It can stay in draft space, although another 6 months of inactivity will cause it to be deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Iconographyincorporated
''I, Iconographyincorporated, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Iconographyincorporated (talk) 09:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have restored Draft:Anthony Atanasio, if that's what you want. Your talk page is not deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Anthony Atanasio
''I, Iconographyincorporated, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Iconographyincorporated (talk) 09:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Freeview logo.svg
File was deleted per F5, The image should've actually been saved by the editor who removed it, Thanks, -– Davey 2010 Talk 18:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please use this, otherwise it will delete again.  I am unclear what you have in mind in your request. Did you just want a copy, or want to put it back in an article? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry I wanted it back in the article, When I put it should've been saved I meant the editor who removed it should've put it in the article, Anyway thanks for kindly undeleting it, Happy editing, – Davey 2010 Talk 12:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Threewave Software
Restore the related talk page of a restored page to understand the history of discussions regarding this page to further understand the edits and address concerns that led to its deletion, so it might be corrected to avoid re-deletion, thank you. -165.225.80.104 (talk) 13:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done It looks like the overall article was restored by, so I've also restored the talk page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Mack B. Pearsall
First,The page entry was hours old (And I was slaving over the content, expecting to "save" shortly). Second, if anyone had chosen to review the updated content they would have seen that I was online and stepping up. Lastly, less than 24 hours to compose...and dismissng the 7 day rule of citations/references. Unreasonable. You guys and girls do some great work in managing this stuff (I have contributed before, and respected the outcomes and motives), but this is not a good sign about where WP is headed (IMHO). — Preceding unsigned comment added by ITCORPS (talk • contribs) 21:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * As the one who placed the speedy deletion tag, I can inform whomever considers the undeletion that a PROD (where this user is getting the "7 day rule" from) was placed by another user following the speedy deletion tag, probably in error.  JTP ( talk • contribs) 23:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Before we continue, please explain:
 * Is your username an organization name? If so, go to WP:CHU/Simple and request that it be changed to something personal, that represents only you and not an organization.
 * Your edit summaries say you've been interviewing the family. That implies that you have an association with the family. Perhaps you are being paid to create the article? If so, you are required to disclose your conflict of interest publicly (preferably on your user page User:ITCORPS), because you agreed to abide by Terms of Use when you created your account here.
 * Finally, main article space isn't a good place to work on drafts, precisely because unsuitable material is quickly deleted. If this article were restored, it would be in draft space, not main space. And if you have a conflict of interest, you would have to submit your draft for review through Articles for creation before it can be accepted for publication in main article space.
 * Please reply and we can go from there. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

My username is that of an individual, and is within the guidelines as I understand them. I am not being paid to write an article on this man, and am a professional colleague. On WP...I, as a rule, usually come in when people contact me concerned that there is erroneous or incorrect data in their Wiki. I respectfully edit and leave. This is my first serious attempt at a page, and is based on information I received that one of the most noteworthy citizens of NC was in bad health and had always quietly dreamed of being on Wiki. Since no one else had gotten off of their butt to make the difference, I have stepped up. I completely agree on my creating drama with working in main space, and have apologized for the wasted time my blunder caused. Equally, I expect that you will agree that the quick-draw mentality in here is less than ideal. My wish for you, me and other folks who have something genuine to offer is that more energy is expended on manuals that aren't so much like a linux training manual. We should all be better enabled at utilizing this amazing tool :-) Hope that covers it for you...  I advised on the main talk page that I was going to lay back for a few days due to schedule but would resume in drafts.  Best Regards ITCORPS (talk) 01:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * ✅. I have restored the article to Draft:Mack B. Pearsall where you may continue working on it without concern that someone will come along and speedily delete it. Because you have an association with the subject of the article, you have a conflict of interest. Therefore, please submit the article for review via WP:AFC when you believe it is ready, or drop me a note on my talk page and I'll be happy to review it. Be aware also that any statement made about a living person must cite a reliable and verifiable published source, in accordance with Biographies of living persons. Right now the article contains no citations to any sources, just links to other Wikipedia articles. Personal notes from unpublished interviews don't qualify as verifiable. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks so much, Anachronist. Know that one of my takeaways is the blessing of having an empowered insider/editor, and maybe another will be an attempt to help compose better tools to help others in here (After much more humble research). I will PM you as I go, and am incredibly grateful for your offer. Warm wishes to all, and thanks again for the amazing and truly selfless work you all do.ITCORPS (talk) 15:03, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Krimuk2.0
Please help me restore my previously deleted user page. -Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do. There is no deleted history at User:Krimuk2.0. You seem to have edited the user page User:Krimuk90 several times. That page is deleted and that user account is blocked. I'd kinda like to understand the history of how you came to have both accounts before we start restoring pages. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Not true. Let me explain: My original account was named Krimuk90. I requested for a name change when I took a long Wiki-break. When that was done, a vandal hijacked the old username (Krimuk90). Thus that account was blocked. Now, I've renamed my account as Krimuk2.0 as that original username is no longer available. If you see my user history i.e. Krimuk2.0's user history, you'll see that I've been an editor since 2011 and have only used one account. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So do you want the content that used to be in User:Krimuk90? It had "Game-changers of 2015", featured articles, featured lists, good articles, Current and future projects and a couple of other sections. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, that's correct. Thank you so much, . Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done renamed to User:Krimuk2.0 to avoid confusion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * , much appreciated! I'm sorry to be such a bother, but could you also undelete this page? Thank you! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done see User:Krimuk2.0/List of films and television series seen. This may not be appropriate for Wikipedia hosting, so I suggest that you grab a copy before someone formally gives it the chop. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Atmospheric pressure experiment (Torricelli)
I'm the instructor for Wikipedia Education Programme. I wish to work with the student to incorporate this into an existing article. -Taweetham (talk) 13:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ The sandbox was already moved to Atmospheric pressure experiment. And then moved to Atmospheric pressure experiment (Torricelli) and deleted.  I have restored this back to User:Kanesskong/sandbox. It may be good to transwiki to Wikiversity. Merging to Torricelli's experiment of atmospheric pressure is a good idea. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dr. William A. Davis Jr.
''I, Jpappafotis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jason Pappafotis 14:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Omar A Thomas
''I, ForKandO, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' ForKandO (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ID Wholesaler
''I, MaeDarla, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' MaeDarla (talk) 16:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

The page was deleted because it had not been edited in over six month. I wish to request that my page be undeleted (or reinstated) as I have two new citations to incorporate into the content for approval consideration. -MaeDarla (talk) 16:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Annie-Sage Whitehurst
''I, 98.14.132.140, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 98.14.132.140 (talk) 19:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:32, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example
PhilPohl (talk) 23:55, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Axel V. Tiesen Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Empires (video game)
Since Empires (video game) was undeleted and userfied to User:TamaMcGlinn/Empires (video game), the talk page should also be undeleted and moved with no redirect to User talk:TamaMcGlinn/Empires (video game). - GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 00:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User talk:TamaMcGlinn/Empires (video game). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Deshdoot
''I, SardaVinita, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SardaVinita (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ASCI Red
''I, Amkdeath, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Amkdeath (talk) 04:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Now at Draft:ASCI Red. But note that ASCI Red already has an article, and was in fact the reason your AFC was rejected - is there any particular reason you wanted to resurrect this five-year-old draft? -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

BackSlash Linux
You can see the growing notability of the Distribution in the following links: http://www.backslashlinux.in/ https://www.linux.com/blog/backslash-linux-new-cool-looking-distro-community https://sourceforge.net/projects/backslash-linux/ http://ribalinux.blogspot.in/2016/11/how-to-install-backslash-os-anna.html http://ribalinux.blogspot.in/2016/11/backslash-os-anna-overview-best-of.html http://sounddmafia.xyz/download/distro-flash-backslash-linux-in-5-min-or-less/RF3MY2_ZgDU.html http://www.codelecture.com/wp/new-backslash-linux-elsa-full-preview-w-subs/ https://www.patreon.com/posts/backslash-os-of-7262265 http://sjbuzz.net/video/page/backslash-os-anna-debian--ubuntu-based-cinnamon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF3MY2_ZgDU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lmyCwNkbK0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBb9W7z0nAk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEjjmgJmr9o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwTFROGrp34 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10f9L6uLUP8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuQuG-NdGes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Kt-UrLobj0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuZAjS6npwo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYrPDGOwqx4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0uBK0T298k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2M90qFpB10 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNlcfEluOng https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1c31ZF0SB0&t=11s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUPjLNN6RG4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA5nhV2x71A -47.247.145.82 (talk) 07:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/BackSlash Linux, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

C R Krishnan
One of the reasons given was that his book 'Frogs under the Wheels' was not shown as reviewed by Argos newspaper, in Brighton, East Sussex. This is not so. The first edition of this book was published by UKAuthors /BlueChrome in 2005, and this was reviewed by the Argos Newspaper by Mike Bacon. Details are on the Amazon UK page where this book is being marketed. The second edition of this book was published by Grenadier Productions and publications. This means this book is not a self publication. You can also see his details on IMDb. If you still feel that his deletion should stand, so be it. Many thanks and best wishes. -Iansholt (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC) http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3055669/
 * As above, the article was deleted by Articles for deletion/C R Krishnan. Please use the Deletion review process instead. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Malcolm Gray (Designer, Ortak)
''I, 75.247.154.221, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 75.247.154.221 (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * working on sources -75.247.154.221 (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft: John Gale
I would like to edit the page and add the references that Wikipedia requires. -Rebecca Gale Hayes (talk) 23:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Schweitzer Art Glass Studio
''I, Jsepielli, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jsepielli (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example
Sillysweet 13795 (talk) 01:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done, nothing to do. Article to be restored was not specified, and there are no deleted contributions from this user. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Annual Shakespeare's Birthday Sonnet Slam
74.90.186.52 (talk) 05:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Wipeout Coverart.png
Subject to edit warring by two editors at Wipeout (video game). I want discussions on both soon, but I'm unsure whether FFD is necessary. Meanwhile, this should be reinserted as the infobox image and push out the other one into body article for now. -George Ho (talk) 07:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Restored. Please re-insert it and remove the fair use deletion tag, which will expire on 22 January. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

File:WipEout2097Cover.jpg
Same for the image of Wipeout 2097. The Saturn image should be pushed into body. -George Ho (talk) 07:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Restored. As above, please include in an article and removed the orphaned fair use tag. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Whiskey Bards
''I, Cybotik, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Cybotik (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:DACH
''I, Tcs75, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Tcs75 (talk) 14:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:David N. Pepperell
''I, Merita28, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Merita28 (talk) 01:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Alice Bertha Morton
She was a famous sculptor and artist and I feel her work should be celebrated on wikipedia -Mufc ed (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That is not what Wikipedia is for. See WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people) for our inclusion standards. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 02:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Music News
-Music-News.com is one of the largest, and well-respected music news sources online. It is top on a ‘Music News’ google search having been identified by Google as a quality site and having held that position for over 12 years. -A search for Music-News.com on Wikipedia shows many hundreds of quoted references, entries and footnotes from every genre of artist and relevant news articles and content. -Music News is regularly asked to appear on the BBC News programming as well as BBC Radio and many radio stations world-wide. -Music News is a member of the BRIT Awards and BBC Music Awards judging panel. -Regularly quoted by New York Times, The Times, Daily Mail, The Sun, The Mirror, Independent, The Guardian, Express, Metro, Evening Standard and more too numerous to mention across the globe. -Over 250 independent journalists write for Music News, Music News Italy, Music News Malta -Music News is park of a network consisting of Music News: music-news.com, Film News: film-news.co.uk, Theatre News: theatre-news.com, Game News: game-news.co.uk -Regularly interview top musicians while also giving a voice to up-and-coming talent https://www.youtube.com/user/MusicNewsWeb -Music News provides breaking news 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. -Strong music industry connections with BPI & PRS for Music. -Passionate about real music of all genres from all countries. -Marco Gandolfi (talk) 22:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

The above request for undeletion was sent in order to disute the suggestion that Music-News.com was not relevant as suggested in the deletion log and not a promotional excersize. Music-News.com is regularly referenced across Wikipedia and should rightfully be reinstated allowing people to see the source of all these references. -Marco Gandolfi (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If that was why you submitted the above request, then you did yourself an utter disservice; that section looks spammy as hell. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 02:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Music News, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Joan Susannah Sadler (nee Wilkinson)
I am trying to get more verification of some of the sources for some of the content in this entry. then click the "Save page" button below -Tswilk3 (talk) 03:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ghetto at Covenant College
''I, Josephafranks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Josephafranks (talk) 09:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

I spent much time drafting this article for a serious recognizable entity and I wish to keep editing and get this page approved eventually -Josephafranks (talk) 09:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Smart specialisation (England)
''I, Kimmacs3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Kimmacs3 (talk) 09:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rax_(programming_language)
''I, Jmswams, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jmswams (talk) 09:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Children of Baal
''I, Nero Calatrava, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Nero Calatrava (talk) 08:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Hydraulic Injection Injury
''I, 2A02:C7F:BC05:4C00:6955:7EFB:A41:617, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2A02:C7F:BC05:4C00:6955:7EFB:A41:617 (talk) 07:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Peter CottonTale
''I, 2601:241:8300:8970:1B4:E4DB:7D08:75E8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2601:241:8300:8970:1B4:E4DB:7D08:75E8 (talk) 06:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Needed help getting the page finished and published -2601:241:8300:8970:1B4:E4DB:7D08:75E8 (talk) 06:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Asad Khan (musician)
''I, JKhade, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' JKhade (talk) 09:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There was nothing in article space. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:First Fragment
''I, 74.56.46.28, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 74.56.46.28 (talk) 09:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dora Chatterjee
''I, Jodi.a.schneider, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 06:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dariush Ashouri
''I, Amir jamez, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Amir jamez (talk) 06:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:MxGPU
''I, Nosfiratu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Nosfiratu (talk) 04:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nosfiratu (talk) 04:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Article is still in progress, albeit slow.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example
Kesval (talk) 04:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Draft:Orland E. Esval restored Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bill Isaacs
''I, Vicky Paraschak, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Vicky Paraschak (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)