Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 260

Sha-ron Edwards or maybe Draft:Sha-ron Edwards
moved this from the top of the page where it was accidentally added incorrectly a few days ago... 47.222.203.135 (talk) 14:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

I would like to request the page Sha-ron Edwards be undeleted. I still had some edits left to fix on it. I would like another chance to correct everything that was done incorrectly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwardss734 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nephric portal system
''I, Whoop whoop pull up, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty &#124; Averted crashes 18:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/World Development Foundation
14:32, 25 November 2013 Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk | contribs) moved page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/World Development Foundation to World Development Foundation (Created via Articles for creation) after due review. 22:26, 4 January 2017 AnomieBOT III (talk | contribs) deleted page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/World Development Foundation (G8: Broken redirect to World Development Foundation with a remark "If this bot is malfunctioning, please report it at User:AnomieBOT III/shutoff/BrokenRedirectDeleter)" It appears that the AnomieBOT III has wrongly deleted World Development Foundation. Pl. undelete it Rupalisharma (talk) 15:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * In this case you should ask Anthony Appleyard to undelete World Development Foundation and change it back to a draft so that you can change it to stop it being an advertisement. Also consider Articles for deletion/World Development Foundation, where you will need to find significant independent references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Patrick and Harry Loughnane
This is an important part of my family history and I was very saddened to see it had been removed —5.69.229.203 (talk) 15:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There was clear consensus for removal and it was unconvincing in our standards. SwisterTwister   talk  18:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Patrick and Harry Loughnane, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

The Ü Party
I would like the article for The Ü Party to be restored as a draft so that I can revise it with appropriate sources and resubmit it for approval. MikeMWiley (talk) 10:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Please ask the speedy deleting admin Peridon to do this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Teresa May
See User_talk:Sandstein. Please restore to draftspace. —Unscintillating (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmm. The coverage isn't actually about her, it's about the Trump administration's spelling error to refer to the UK prime minister as "Teresa May". And... the deleted article already mentioned that, before it was deleted, and it was still deleted. Looks like a WP:1EVENT to me, in which Teresa May is a bystander in a minor event not directly related to her. I don't object to restoration as a draft, but I'll defer to another admin. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * We already have the article Teresa May. Looks like the same subject.
 * So maybe the best thing would be to do a history merge with the deleted Teresa May (actress). ~Anachronist (talk) 23:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * With the new article, I don't need the old article in draftspace. However, as I understand the preferences expressed at the AfD, there is a preferred organization with a dab page.   is the dab page that belongs at Teresa May.  The new article revision should be history merged at Teresa May (actress).  Unscintillating (talk) 23:56, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Once again, events have moved ahead without the edit history being restored. An admin here thought it would be a good idea to G4 the dab page, and while Sandstein disagreed with the G4, he reopened his interest in notability and started talking AfD.  It is our policy to WP:PRESERVE and fix the value that others have added to the encyclopedia.  I've gone ahead and used editorial authority to do a full merge of the article at Teresa May to Teresa May (actress), and I've restored the dab page.  Editors are still awaiting restoration of the edit history.  Unscintillating (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * A history merge would have been terribly messy because the Teresa May (actress) article has over 400 edits going all the way back to 2005 (and I have just restored all that history). It wouldn't be useful to merge the short history of Teresa May into the middle of that. I agree with making it a dab page and leaving Teresa May (actress) with all its history in place.
 * I believe we can consider this ✅ now, for what it's worth. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Electronicstars
''I, 89.129.0.23, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 89.129.0.23 (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ocean Way Nashville
''I, Dubist12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dubist12 (talk) 17:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This page was not deleted under G13, but due to it being advertising. It is full of WP:Peacockery.  Instead you can ask User:Tokyogirl79 if she will reconsider her deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * At least part of the page is copyvio from here, so it can't be restored here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Alpine Ascents International
Page has been written from scratch and is properly and sufficiently sourced.InfoDataMonger —InfoDataMonger (talk) 16:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So where is the rewrite? I don't see it in draft space. The deleted article was deleted in 2008 for being unambiguously promotional. It's now 9 years later. If you want to replace it with a new version rewritten from scratch, go right ahead, nothing is stopping you. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Anachronist, It looks like he's referring to this section of his sandbox. In any case InfoDataMonger, I think that it still needs work as portions of the new version are sort of promotional. The section on Seven Summits is a little spammy reading and I don't see where there is any need for a controversy section, given that it doesn't really pertain to the company in any way that would be of interest to Wikipedia. It just says that there are people who abuse performing enhancing drugs and gives a bit of history of people who have used and don't use the drugs. The only part that actually pertains to the company is a statement that AAI forbids their use, requiring customers to sign forms saying that they won't. It's not really anything of interest to Wikipedia and would be considered WP:INDISCRIMINATE info. I also question the bibliography section, as Into Thin Air isn't about the company and as far as I can tell from the 1996 Mount Everest disaster article, the company is uninvolved other than the fact that they do tours of Mount Everest. I have to assume that the same thing goes for the other book listed in the bibliography section, especially as it was published before the company was founded. IDM, the bibliography section should only contain books that discuss the company in-depth and aren't just travel guide books that list every company that offers the same services. I also note that some of the sources are for books and other things that aren't actually about the company, but about things that are related to the company like the history of drug abuse and mountain climbing. These sources can't give the company notability and as stated above, there's no reason for this section in the article. I did a quick search for one of the sources and it looks like this source is actually a press release, which makes it a WP:PRIMARY source since it was written by a company who is sponsoring the company - meaning that they have a financial interest in promoting AAI. Press releases cannot show notability regardless of where it was posted or what they claim. I didn't look at the other sources, but there's enough here to where I think that this still needs a lot of work before it would be ready to be reconsidered for republishing. I must also ask this - do you have any sort of conflict of interest (WP:COI) with this article? The reason I'm asking is that the way the article is written gives off the strong impression that you do have a COI, as this is written similarly to other paid articles I've seen. You can edit with a COI, you just have to declare it, is all. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  17:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like you were warned last year and I don't see where you ever disclosed that per the poster's request. I also note that it looks like you created several other pages that were deleted at AfD and had issues with promotional language. You've been warned about the COI policy and you've seen fit to ignore this. I'm issuing you a short block and bringing this up at the COI noticeboard. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  17:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like they've been doing this for a long time, so I'm giving you an indef with the possibility of an unblock but I'll still bring this up at COIN. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  17:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like there's no need for a COIN post, as they were indef'd in the past for ignoring warnings and guidelines in the past over COPYVIO and were given a second chance with the explicit warning that they need to follow guidelines. Given that they're already aware that they need to follow guidelines and received one warning over policy, they've burned through their second chance. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  17:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

File:FreeFlyer_GUI_Screenshot.jpg
Hello! I only just now noticed that the image above was deleted back in September due to "F6: Non-free media file with no non-free use rationale (TW)". I'm in a position at the software's owning company to provide such fair-use for screenshots of the tool, and I'd like a screenshot to exist on the page to improve its quality. Can this be undeleted? 38.103.29.194 (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin' (Too Good to Be True).png
The JPEG version is currently used. However, I want to undelete the PNG version to replace the other version in Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin' (Too Good to Be True). —George Ho (talk) 11:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please use it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:David May
''I, Fsusaints, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Fsusaints (talk) 21:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.&mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Championship Rally (Atari Lynx)
Since Championship Rally (Atari Lynx) was undeleted, the talk page should also be undeleted. — GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 00:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Robyn L Ackland
The article was facts about a successful writer with 4 published books in both ebook and paperback. I don't understand how that isn't a acceptable topic when there is so many others just like it. There was no advertising in the article. The only thing close to it was links to her author pages for reference, if that is is the issues please remove the links. Thank You —ACkland07 (talk) 17:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * . If those advertising links had been removed, the article would have been deleted anyway as an unsourced biography of a living person. As such, it constituted advertising.


 * Based on your username, it seems that you are the subject of this article. Autobiographies are strongly discouraged. Because you have a conflict of interest about the subject, you should write the article in Draft space (as in Draft:Robyn L. Ackland and you must submit your article for review via WP:AFC before it can be accepted for publication. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

1993 Murphy Cup playoffs
Requesting restoration to my sandbox. Deleting Admin is being resistive. Trackinfo (talk) 03:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * And rigthly resistive according to policy, so X mark.svg Not done, as this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/1993 Murphy Cup playoffs, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Lectonar (talk) 14:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Pedro Fernando
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Pedro Fernando Manuel (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC) This article can not be deleted


 * X mark.svg Not done. Article is not (yet) deleted. Regards  So Why  15:50, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

User:Katybird117/Louis Romano, Sr.
Katybird117 (talk) 14:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:United Through Reading
Picking up this project again as part of my work with a non-profit, and I need to work to get this page published. —Msmorangolan (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/22nd Infantry Division (Philippines)
''I, Spoonek9, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Spoonek9 (talk) 18:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Blac Youngsta
I am a new editor here, and I may not know a lot about Wikipedia, but after seeing that the article Blac Youngsta was deleted off here because of one deletion vote, it looks like it was an unfair decision that was done to the article, it should have ended as "no consensus" since there was literally one person (other than the nominator) that thought that the article should be deleted. This article should be given another chance, thank you. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 04:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC) —Bloomdoom2 (talk) 04:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, we have a consensus of three: the nominator, the person who left a comment, and the deleting admin who agreed with the nominator's rationale. Looking at the AFD, I admit it is short but the argument for deleting is pretty solid. If you disagree with that outcome, you can ask the deleting administrator to reconsider and possibly restore the article to draft space for further improvement. Failing that, you can take the case to WP:DRV, not to argue the merits of the subject, but to determine if the deletion decision was proper... and you just might get the article restored and re-listed at WP:AFD for a longer discussion. But we cannot restore articles by request on this page, if they have been deleted as a result of an AFD discussion. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for letting me know, I wasn't aware of those methods before since I'm a new editor, but I will try what you said, thanks for responding. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 04:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

User:Harrisontc/sandbox
''I, Harrisontc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Harrisontc (talk) 22:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Skywhale (band)
Cjcooper (talk) 00:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Slapdash (film)
''I, Hebert72, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Hebert72 (talk) 00:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like you made a restoration request for this back in June 2014, however you did not edit the draft and it was deleted as stale the following year. What sort of assurance can you give us that you will work on it this time, if we restore it again? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

traywitthemac11
TrayWitTheMac11, bro this TrayWitTheMac as u know im a famous producer from baltimore, Maryland i attend lots of events and make a lot of known hits I need my page list because I have so many fans and people that want to know my life and what I been thur in my life that got me to my success here today, theres other producer same as me that as pages that i have more credits then that have got approved i dont understand why you guys want to delete my page im signed to a global record labels this will be a real inconvience if my page does not get listed I think my page should be giving s try fair chance as everybody else thanks
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.


 * Bottom line: Wikipedia must never be used for promotion or publicity purposes. It doesn't exist to give anyone a "fair chance". Please go to Facebook for that. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Initial D - Street Stage cover.jpg
Now used on Initial D: Street Stage again. — GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 02:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, image file restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Roi Et Rajabhat University
''I, Willbarratt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Will Barratt (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Management abandoned the page, new management wants a Wikipedia entry "Save page" button below —Will Barratt (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I have a question - are you the same person that was editing the page previously or was that part of the old management and you took over their account? If you're not the same person then you will need to open a new account as shared accounts are against Wikipedia guidelines.

Cam Gordon
If I remember correctly, this article was well-referenced at some point. If not, I commit to sourcing it. — gobonobo + c 17:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Nishanth
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Yugimrlonely (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

hi,

The above link is my article which has been deleted. I am an actor in tamil film industry. I have also send you the details of my previous films where you could find my Name under casting,please help me to create an article on "NISHANTH" so i could link all the wiki articles to my profile.

Thank you, Nishanth


 * ( Non-administrator comment ) See Nishanth, Articles for deletion/Nishanth (actor) and Draft:Nishanth. -- Finngall   talk  14:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Nishanth (actor), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * (snipped inappropriate links)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. The deleted main space article Nishanth starts out "Nishanth is the guy who..." and rambles on in a single run-on sentence, definitely not suitable for publication in main space. Nishanth (actor) was deleted at Articles for deletion/Nishanth (actor), making that article ineligible for restoration. There is already a draft article at Draft:Nishanth, which is not yet suitable for publication in main article space. I suggest improving the draft and submitting it for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

2005 Ho Chi Minh City Open
PRODed as part of a series of questionable deletion proposals of sports articles by the same author. Some were clearly notable, some weren't, and the relevant WikiProjects were never notified in many cases. This one clearly satisfies WP:NTENNIS as an event on the ATP Tour, and definitely should not have been deleted. I strongly would have objected if I had noticed in time. —Smartyllama (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Smartyllama (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ✔️ by Ad Orientem. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Munir John Randhawa Advocate
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Johnjoefrazer (talk) 23:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I cannot find any deleted article starting with "Munir John" in main space, draft space, or AFC space. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I believe that our requestor is asking about this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Randhawa&type=revision&diff=735735014&oldid=734838394 . The article will have to be written first before it can appear on the surname article page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Laila Macharia
retrieving WP:PROD —Prisencolin (talk) 02:21, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Lal Fonseka
retrieving expired WP:PROD —Prisencolin (talk) 02:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Bradley Lowery
So I can see the deleted article, to assist discussion of whether it can be restored and what can be added to it —86.20.193.222 (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It was deleted at AfD just recently, so we cannot restore it here. I'll ping to this request since they closed the discussion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, are you ? If so, please be aware that posting this can be seen as a block evasion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

a) no, I'm not "bugmenot".
 * He's declined the request, so now the only thing you can do is go to WP:DRV. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

b) I just want to see the deleted article, so that I can work on a possible DRV appeal; I need to see what is included, and work out what can be added. I asked King to restore the article, but he has ignored that part of my request.

I wasn't expecting this to be so complicated :-s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.193.222 (talk) 01:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I have temporarily undeleted the page. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 16:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

File:PhineasFerbPaint designs.jpg
I want to upload a bigger version. However, I must upload one of the previous versions first, so I can work on the size and then upload a size bigger than the current version but smaller than the original. —George Ho (talk) 17:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I restored it. Please fix and tag appropriately for revision deletion when you are finished. Cheers,  TLSuda  (talk) 22:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

E-Mail of User talk:The Empire of History pages

 * User talk:The Empire of History/14
 * User talk:The Empire of History/15
 * User talk:The Empire of History/16
 * User talk:The Empire of History/17
 * User talk:The Empire of History/18
 * User talk:The Empire of History/19
 * User talk:The Empire of History/21

If it is possible, I would like if the final revised versions of each of these pages be e-mailed to my personal e-mail account, attached with this Wikipedia account. I intend to transfer the content of these pages to fiction.wikia.com. If an administrator would be willing to do this for me, it would be greatly appreciated. I had made an earlier request on one of my pages, but that request never received a response. Thank you for your cooperation. --The Empire of History (talk) 02:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rick Dunham (author)
''I, Greggorman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Greggorman (talk) 03:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Iñigo Pascual
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jolosborlaza (talk) 12:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1= Iñigo Pascual
 * 2= Iñigo Pascual is a popular young starl in the Philippines. He is a son of a popular and award winning host, actor and singer Piolo Pascual. Iñigo Pascual starred at 3 movies entitled Para Sa Hopeless Romantic, Relaks Its Just Pag-ibig and Crazy Beautiful You.
 * The last content on the page just said "He was born". I am sure you can do better. I suggest you start at Draft:Iñigo Pascual and supply references.  Being a son of someone with an article Piolo Pascual does not show any notability here though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:High Kingsdown
''I, 92.6.210.92, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 92.6.210.92 (talk) 23:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Madison lintz
restore as redirect to Madison Lintz, current draft has not been deleted in several years —Prisencolin (talk) 00:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ recreated. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

bishoy goubran
Admin who deleted the article did so based on "post doctoral fellow" I don't think he took the time to read that the notability is due to the IQ percentile (which is backed up by many references being 99.99 percentile) and he presumed clear consensus. —Nabeelwasef (talk) 12:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Bishoy Goubran, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
 * This looks like a good candidate for discussion at WP:DRV but you have to talk to DGG first. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * , 99.99 is one in 10,000. there are 7,400,000,000 people now living, according to our article on World population, so there are 740,000 people of equal or greater intelligence--if you actually think that there is validity that many standard deviations from the mean.  DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Aranye Maniac Killer Mystery (2014 Short Film)
The short film was locally promoted & well know like in Jhargram. its a independent bengali film theirs many publicity and oral talk about the film, real talented peoples which fail for rich coverage. the articles all source are in google, the short film are exits I requested to try to save one of my article contribution. —Yudisina (talk) 06:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do, article is not deleted. You may discuss deletion at Articles for deletion/Aranye Maniac Killer Mystery (2014 Short Film). ~Anachronist (talk) 07:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Sudhu Tomari (Telefilm 2013)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Yudisina (talk) 07:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do, article is not deleted. You may discuss deletion at Articles for deletion/Sudhu Tomari (Telefilm 2013). ~Anachronist (talk) 07:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute
''I, Ediamond, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ediamond (talk) 12:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

I now have time in my workplan to improve the page according to earlier suggestins for making it better conform to Wikipedia standards —Ediamond (talk) 12:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Ediamond, I can't restore it since it had content taken directly from here, which makes it a WP:COPYVIO. I can, however, email you a copy of the content, which I'll send now to the email address attached to this account. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Slater Investments Ltd
''I, LuyAlp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' LuyAlp (talk) 23:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Therr Maitz
Heldexa (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Lang-zh
Previous revisions must still exist. The template was somehow restored after G6 speedy deletion. —George Ho (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * U2713.svg Already done by Lectonar. --George Ho (talk) 10:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

EMKAY, Inc.
Page was deleted due to lack of notability. I have been working to edit and add notable 3rd party sources but the page was deleted before the changes could be made. There are numerous sources that are credible and will add to the pages notability if given the opportunity to complete the updates. —MPOB (talk) 16:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌. This page is for requesting undeletion of articles removed through fast-track processes, but the draft article was removed after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:EMKAY, Inc., so deletion would have to go to Deletion review (where, in my opinion, it is unlikely to succeed). Guy (Help!) 16:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

SENE Film, Music & Arts Festival
''I, Flipcap, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Flipcap (talk) 04:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:James Hyman
A previous member of staff was working on the draft, she left very suddenly and the project got neglected. i would like to re-eit the page and improve it to see if we can get it submitted. i would be very grateful if you could re-instate it using my user name and details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katewestbrook (talk • contribs) 12:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:James Hyman (art historian) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bleddfa Centre for the Creative Arts
Fairfielder1920 (talk) 15:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Adolfine Ryland
''I, 62.253.204.251, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 62.253.204.251 (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

sigos gmbh
Page contains no advertisement. No violation of policies, no evidence of manipulated accounts —Bjornkoetz (talk) 16:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ creator was blocked as a sock. Page was called SIGOS GmbH. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Wisy
This was created by a bot, as a stub about a place in Poland (pl:Wisy) - not eligible for A7 —Peter James (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * How the page was created is irrelevant. The last deleted version simply contains some rap lyrics about a rapper named Wisy, and there is no credible assertion of significance, so yes indeed it was eligible for for A7. However, it appears that this version was a result of vandalism and the deleting administrator didn't notice the legitimate article hidden in the history. I've restored it.
 * ✅. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Jabłonna, Radomsko County
This article created by a bot was speedily deleted as a test page 2 years later. It was probably a valid stub; there's an article pl:Jabłonna (powiat radomszczański) in the Polish Wikipedia. —Peter James (talk) 00:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It sure looked like a test page when it was tagged for deletion. This was due to vandalism, and the deleting admin didn't notice the legitimate article in the history. I have restored it.
 * ✅. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:SWU-Matias H. Aznar Memorial College of Medicine Inc.
''I, Aden2015, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Aden2015 (talk) 03:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Please do not copy other web site content into this page again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Thomas Payne (Architect)
''I, Xeniaster, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Xeniaster (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Sudhu Tomari (Telefilm 2013)

 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Black Kite, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The page was last at Sudhu Tomari, and an offer is open to have this restored as a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Black Kite, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The page was last at Sudhu Tomari, and an offer is open to have this restored as a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rentalcars.com
''I, KatFishy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' KatFishy (talk) 08:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Andrej Holm
Article was deleted in 2008, since then the German Sociologist has been the subject of two other major controversies in Germany, been appointed to a regional government and whose firing from the Humboldt University has led to an occupy-style protest as well as much reflection on the state of former Stasi affiliates in contemporary Germany —Nickfarr (talk) 20:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please add more information and sources and remove the prod template I added. I put on the prod, in case no further action to improve happens. You are welcome to remove it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

MiHsC
Since the article was deleted after much discussion, evidence has continued to emerge that the 'EmDrive' is more than flakey experimental results....

e.g. consider this interview with an experimenter presents convincing evidence that it is real or this chart comparing observed emdirve thrust with predictions MiHsC

... and MiHsC is one of the better attempts at explaining how it works. The hypothesis may not be correct but I think it's notable. It does seem to agree with measured results (e.g. galaxy rotation speed) better than many other hypotheses e.g. dark matter

Mr McCulloch's (MiHsC originator) blog has more. —James Kay (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * You know, it clearly says we can't restore this article at the top of this page.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/MiHsC, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Kamahl Santamaria
He is a notable broadcast journalist working for Al Jazeera English (an international news channel). Wikipedia already has a series of articles called "Al Jazeera English personalities" featuring the profiles of the many broadcast journalists working for the channel. The list is quite comprehensive but several names are in red. If you feature pages for most of his colleagues, it does not make sense as to why his article is removed. I believe the article was incorrectly flagged as "not notable" by someone who has little knowledge of the Al Jazeera English news channel. I had accessed the article earlier this year and was disappointed to find it deleted when I tried to access it again. The article did have some issues but it is something that can be improved upon, it does not have to be deleted entirely. Broadcast journalists are notable personalities as they feature on national and international news stations. Students at journalism schools are often required to do biographical-type projects on other journalists so these articles are of significance to certain people. —196.249.32.102 (talk) 00:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:University of Illinois at Chicago College of Public Health
Howaboutudance (talk) 04:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:University of Illinois at Chicago College of Public Health
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Harmony at Home Nanny Agency
third party information —Island of Wight (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.. Guy (Help!) 09:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Organizations in Budge Budge
''I, Ritroy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ritroy (talk) 09:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Sharif Abdel Kouddous
Reason for deletion of article listed as: "I can't find any reliable, independent sources *about* Kouddous, nothing to suggest he himself is notable enough for an article." There are a number of reliable, independent sources about Kouddous readily available online. Not sure what criteria is required to be notable. —35.128.58.22 (talk) 11:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please add more of those sources you mention. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Azamara Club Cruises
I wanted this page restored because I believe it was unfairly deleted. This is an information about a cruise line and its vessels are still sailing with the cruise line and I believe the page should be restored because there is still information about it. —Angelgreat (talk) 23:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Project Peanut Butter
I would like to improve the page, making the notability clear. I would like the page userfied. —Riceissa (talk) 09:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Riceissa/Project Peanut Butter. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)