Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 262

Draft:Johnny Symons
Dchein (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * . Start it over from scratch. The deleted history includes a copyright violation of http://itvs.org/films/ask-not/filmmaker and a revision that is so promotional in tone that it would need to be rewritten. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

List of UEFA European Championship hat-tricks
I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —S.A. Julio (talk) 02:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I restored it to main space. Feel free to userfy it yourself if you want, but this did not look like a valid G5 deletion to me. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

List of UEFA European Championship own goals
I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —S.A. Julio (talk) 02:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I restored this to User:S.A. Julio/List of UEFA European Championship own goals. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Eerste Pastorie Winburg
''I, Elefant222, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Elefant222 (talk) 13:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Colin Alwin Harris
Can you please restore the previously deleted article to my userspace so that I can compare and improve the article. Thanks. "Save page" button below —Gieenet (talk) 14:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I have restored the article and all the deleted contribution history to Draft:Colin Alwin Harris rather than userfying it. Due to the conflict of interest concerns evident in the AFD discussion, I have protected the main space article from being re-created. This should go through review before publishing it in main space, so please submit it for review when you are finished. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

We need trees association
Is there anything more important than trees and nature and saving them? —Alishahryari (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * What's that got to do with Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion?
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Howard Sachs
Csvane (talk) 15:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:10, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

International Artists Records
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Lynnanchio (talk) 18:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

I am trying to find out why a page was deleted, and your site is very very confusing.

Northamerica 1000 deleted this page, I can find no explanation as to why: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/International_Artists_Records&oldid=765045322

How do I get it undeleted? It should not have been deleted

This is what needs to be UNDONE: 10:43, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist). . (-66)‎ . . International Artists ‎ (→‎top: - . Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records) (current) 10:43, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist). . (-36)‎ . . List of record labels: I–Q ‎ (- * International Artists Records. Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist). . (-8)‎ . . Draft:Crescendo! ‎ (Removing link(s) to "International Artists Records": Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records. (TW)) (current) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist). . (-4)‎ . . Handbell ‎ (Removing link(s) to "International Artists Records": Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records. (TW)) (current) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist). . (-68)‎ . . God Bless the Red Krayola and All Who Sail With It ‎ (Removing link(s) to "International Artists Records": Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records. (TW)) (current) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist). . (-4)‎ . . Daniels Recital Hall ‎ (Removing link(s) to "International Artists Records": Article deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records. (TW)) (current) 10:41, 12 February 2017 (diff | hist). . (+1,613)‎ . . Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Artists Records ‎ (Closing debate, result was delete) (current)

Lynn Andersen International Artists Records


 * No explanation? The discussion at Articles for deletion/International Artists Records isn't sufficient? You had ample opportunity to participate there. The notice was on the article for at least a week.
 * Furthermore, it seems that you haven't read Conflict of interest. Do so now, because you clearly have a conflict of interest here. Be aware that you should not make substantive changes to any article with which you have a conflict of interest. You should propose your changes on the talk page instead. Wikipedia is not a publicity medium and should never be used that way.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/International Artists Records, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Ramaj Eroc
someone on twitter purposely deleted my account —Jcakamril (talk) 12:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That page isn't an account, it's a deleted article about a non-notable musician. It's been created so many times in violation of Wikipedia inclusion criteria that it has now been protected from re-creation.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Ramaj Eroc, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually it was who closed the original deletion discussion (3.5 years ago). I just deleted the most recent creation of the article, and salted it per the decision of the original AfD, and the fact that it has been recreated at least twice since. Other than that, the above advice sounds good. Thanks!  &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Daniel J. Arbess (2)
I didn't create the page, but I would often use it when searching for some of Mr. Arbess' articles and would refer people to the page. He is an investor/commentator with interesting viewpoints and is often on tv. It would be very helpful if you would restore the page. Thank you.


 * . This was already declined above. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

User:Mdd/History of architectural drawing
There is a draft version in its history, which I might continue. The page blanked to temporarily remove the text offline, not as deletion request. —Mdd (talk) 12:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Holy Dave
Melvin Wachira (talk) 19:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Holy_Dave&oldid=729649455 for an earlier version. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Target Open House
''I, Daylen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I would like to update the intro section and merge it into the Target (company) article.'' Daylen (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Woven Words Publishers (OPC) Private Limited
This was the first article I wrote and I see it was deleted by someone but I would request the administrator not to delete it because it was not meant for any promotion or advertisement. Where it costs a lot to self publish books, they publish books for free and according to some local body they are about to open libraries where people can read books for free. There are similar pages that exist on wikipedia. The reference link that takes to an article published by The FreePress Journal newspaper Mumbai edition proves the authenticity of the publishing house. Hoping to hear from you soon. —Aqeeq Ahmed (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That's not what the article suggests which contained clear violations of our policy WP;What Wikipedia is not and the article was deleted by our policies. Examining this "Free press Journal" finds it be a mere business announcement, it's what our policies consider convincing. Other existing articles will not apply when all articles for companies are judged by their own merits. SwisterTwister   talk  00:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Del Toro & Santana
this law firm is the law firm which former Governor Carlos Romero Barceló founded and which he quit after election to Congress as Resident Commissioner of Puerto Rico. This has historical significance. Another of the firm's founders, Russell A. Del Toro, became a national figure after becoming the first Hispanic elected to preside the Federal Bar Association in Washington, DC, another fact of historical importance. —Estequestacatras (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. However you will need to address the concerns lodged by by providing coverage in independent and reliable sources. I'm also concerned that the page reads a little promotional. Also, if you are affiliated with this law firm or any of the people with the firm, you must disclose this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  02:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

List of DirecTV channels
To make a new draf, add sources, update, and possibly fill a gap in "Requested Articles" —Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This was deleted at AfD by in 2012, so you'll need to ask him. I do have to share in concerns from the AfD that the list will be forever at risk of being incorrect due to changes in channels and it could be seen as a bit too much of miscellaneous data (WP:NOTDIR), especially given that we could just easily link to the company's website, where the lineup is already given. I'm not saying that it could never be on here, but you'll have to show where this is of lasting importance to Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  02:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah I'm not feeling it. Drmies (talk) 05:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Elaine Mazlish
Not having a page for 'Elaine Mazlish' while we have a page for 'Adele Faber' is like having a page/article for only one of the Winklevoss twins. I understand that the content provided by ME was not in compliance of Wikipedia, but that should be regarded as MY incompetence and not challenge the merits of the article/page as clearly, I had no intentions to make it look like a promotion or a marketing blurb (as the people in question are aged 89 and above and have not requested for the same). —TopCipher 07:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ as it was copied from another website http://www.fabermazlish.com/about_us.php. Articles here must not be copyright infringements. You can start writing again, but not by copying anyoneelse's work. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Urban Psychology
I would like to add sources and extend the article, since in the meantime I've found new material to add. Thank you. —Ecila~dewiki (talk) 12:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Lectonar (talk) 12:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Standardized Account Code Structure (SACS)
{{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Standardized Account Code Structure (SACS)}


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Jye Bolton
No reason as to why this page should have been deleted. He is my son who has a number of prestigious awards attributed to him through Australian Rules Football, with many pages redirecting to his page which has no information on it. Please can you restore this page so we can upload information for people being redirected to that page about achievements and his career. Thankyou —203.59.41.37 (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The page only said "Is an AFL player", so you are missing nothing. I suggest that you start with Draft:Jye Bolton and provide the newspaper articles etc that give the story.  Since you are close to the person it is best if you do not write what you know, but use other people's writings and put in what is true and balanced. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lolla Tek
''I, Lollatek, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lollatek (talk) 07:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Lollatek, there's nothing to restore as the submission was blank. You can still make a new submission at that location though, so no worries. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I do want to caution you about making an autobiography and about the notability guidelines for performers, which is admittedly strict. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Emtec
''I, Devers9, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Devers9 (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Would like to add more links to address issues highlighted earlier. —Devers9 (talk) 11:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Eyeden
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Boby3362 (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Eyeden was created by me I had all the reliable sources and reasons creating this article but user User:C.fred has deleted this article for giving me no reason what so ever and was keep making different excuses I suppose this Wikipedia user was reported by other users as well, he was being very offensive to my created article and I was putting so much hard work into it very disappointed I need it back.
 * That article was created by Mastereditor2239, a sockpuppet of a blocked user. If that's you, and you want to participate here, you should get your original account User:Shingling334 unblocked first. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Boby3362 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC) Those are my accounts but I cannot log in to those accounts anymore I have to use this one because user c.fred has blocked it forever and there is not an expiry date I have to use this one from now on to create and edit articles.
 * Excuse me? You were using the Mastereditor2239 account just 4 days ago! You can certainly log in there, and post an unblock request on the talk page. You must not evade your block, you must deal with it instead. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

MAKE award
To put the old content in draftspace, for improvement or final deletion —Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Restored to Draft:MAKE award. You will need to modify it heavily and submit it for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Aika Tappaa
Inappropriate G4 deletion. Following a controversial AFD close based on the number and quality of sources, the text was userfied; substantive improvements were made, including the addition of apparently reliable sources, and the text moved back to mainspace. Then it was G4'd at the request of the AFD closer, who has also stated that the article cannot be restored except through DRV (which is also pending). The texts were not substantially identical; whether or not the new sourcing is sufficient is to be determined by standard deletion process, not administrator fiat. —21:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk)
 * The admin who G4-deleted the page restored it 15 minutes later. There were a handful edits in the deleted history, so I just restored those. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Undeletion request for title=Draft:Em_Rossi
Revanoff (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Paint (musical group)
''I, Jeepster33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jeepster33 (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This was restored last year without any improvements on the page. What do you plan to do this time if it is restored? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

I have a revised version to post — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeepster33 (talk • contribs) 11:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, I have restored it. If it isn't worked on, it will be deleted again in a few months, likely permanently. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:StockUnlimited
Brian Zhenqiang Low 06:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Portal:Business and Economics
Per this redirect's history, there may be some revisions prior to the page's creation that should be restored. — Steel1943 (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The deleted contribution history of that page is empty. There is nothing to restore. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Odd, considering that the redirect's deletion log hinted otherwise. Well, I suppose if nothing can be found, feel free to close this request. Steel1943  (talk) 22:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I checked Portal:Business and economics (lowercase) also, and there are no deleted contributions there either. It looks like the page with the title case got moved to the new title with all contributions intact.
 * So, because there's nothing else to do. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:SlipSafe
''I, Eva1403, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Eva1403 (talk) 10:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * , it looks like you requested that this be restored back in April 2016, but made no edits to the page. There was also some concern that the content was far too promotional to be accepted, which is likely due to the fact that the draft heavily relied on content used elsewhere on the Internet. The reason I'm mentioning this is that it might be better for you to just start a whole new article from scratch in your own words, as this might make it less likely to be promotional. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sir Peter Blake Trust
''I, Jaco495, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jaco495 (talk) 03:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * . It wasn't deleted under WP:CSD, it was deleted under WP:CSG (unambiguous promotion) and is therefore ineligible for restoration by request on this page. I suggest you start over from scratch. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Protegent Antivirus
I accidentally saved the blank page when I was practising it in sandbox. I will add some content to it. —Harshitgpt89 (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * . you weren't working in a sandbox, you were doing this in main article space. Please don't do that. Create the article in draft space (like Draft:Protegant Antivirus) or in your sandbox, and submit it to WP:AFC for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

I will keep it in mind and will do in the draft space. Thanks--Harshitgpt89 (talk) 06:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Katharine Towne
The page was deleted after fifteen years, citing a lack of relevance, however I feel that the subject has enough relevance to warrant inclusion. She hasthree dozen listed credits on IMDB, many of which are starring or featured roles, all of which are verified, and is still listed in the Top 5000 on the IMDB Starmeter. In addition, the cultural/historical significance of her family bolsters that the page is a valid resource for the entertainment industry.

She is linked/referenced on the following pages:

Julie Payne (mother) Robert Towne (father) Charlie Hunnam (divorced)

She's also linked to many acting credits on Wikipedia.

I tried contacting the admin who deleted the page, but received no response. Thank you for your time and consideration. —Chrisfullerton1974 (talk) 21:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * We don't count IMDB or Wikipedia as reliable sources, but they can suggest that there would be more information. Can you find some actual web sites, magazines or newspapers that have an article on this person?  We need more information than just a one line mention of an acting credit to be substantial. The deleting admin looks not to be very active.  But if there are better references available then I would make this a draft for you to work on. Otherwise if everything in Articles for deletion/Katharine Towne is correct, there are no substantial, independent, reliable sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Here are some additional sources on the subject, interviews, reviews, etc:

Hollywood.com YourTango.com Buffy Wiki Rotten Tomatoes Variety LA Times BuddyTV.com Additional scans of articles about the subject:  Chrisfullerton1974 (talk) 23:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Katharine Towne, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I'll add that other wikis, directory listings, directory profiles (e.g. Rotten Tomatoes), interviews, and trivial mentions don't count toward notability either. There must be significant coverage of the person (not a few sentences) by multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Additionally she must meet the requirements in WP:NACTOR to be considered for inclusion on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Since you didn't bother to read any of the previous things written here, I'll go ahead and summarize:

I tried contacting "Daniel" and he didn't respond. The original editor who replied to my post here said he's been inactive, so let's go ahead and mar that one off the list.

Second, the Notability requirement says "Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities: Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.", however, you don't take into account movie or television credits, via verifiable sources, such as IMDB, which is pretty much the standard reference for film and television credits. What is it you're looking to be proven? That she was in the things IMDB lists? That she has a fan base? She's Top 5000 on IMDB, so clearly there are a fair amount of people interested in her.

I've always been a champion of Wikipedia, but now I understand the complaints I've heard. Chrisfullerton1974 (talk) 04:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * IMDb is actually not a reliable source by our standards because it's a wiki, and thus (a) subject to radical change at any point and (b ) lacks professional editorial oversight and factchecking. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 09:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Since you didn't fully comprehend my earlier response, I'll summarize: Your early block of sources above (IMDB and Wikipedia) are not acceptable for establishing notability. Your second block of sources are unconvincing, because they consist of trivial mentions, directory listing blurbs, coverage of a show but not the actress, and interviews, none of which constitute significant coverage of the subject. And merely having "credits" in numerous shows doesn't count, we need significant roles. The deleted article contains an unsourced claim that she won an Oscar! If you had a reliable source for that, we could reconsider.
 * So again, . You are free to take this to Deletion review to get a consensus on whether the deletion was improper, or you can start a new article, preferably not in main space but in draft space (if you do it in main space it would be speedily deleted per WP:G4). Nothing is preventing you from creating a new article. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Also just in case they contest this here again - this is the wrong avenue for this, as it went to AfD. If the deleting admin declines or doesn't respond then the only place to take this is deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * On the Oscar, it looks like the article was referring to her father, who won the Oscar. Something to note is that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by being the child of notable people and it's not always inherited by being part of a notable TV series or film - the only time that would give someone notability is if their role is major enough to get noted in coverage of the film/series. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lark Quartet
''I, Benjamin James, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Benjamin James (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like parts of it were taken or closely paraphrased from this source, which likely explains the promotional-ish tones in the article. Since there's WP:COPYVIO we can't restore it for you, although we can email you a copy so you can clean out the copyrighted content. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  20:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  20:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand. How do I arrange to have a copy emailed to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin James (talk • contribs) 21:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll send it to you now. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  21:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Dr. Lawrence Gordon
Please undelete and transfer to user page per Teahouse. No need to discourage new editors. &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 23:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC) — &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 23:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not deleted per se - but I can copy/paste the latest version to their userspace. It looks like one version of the article was deleted at AfD back in 2013, so they'll need to overcome that AfD in order to have it be kept. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  01:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done There's a copy of the article at User:The1Fr33m4n/Dr. Lawrence Gordon. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  01:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  01:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Atrenne Integrated Solutions
This was my first wiki page please give me a second chance I was confused about what I was doing. Thanks! —Atrenneintegratedsolutions (talk) 19:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done User blocked for promo user name, promo edits. --Neil N  talk to me 20:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:SlipSafe (2)
''I, Eva1403, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Eva1403 (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This request was already declined previously; see above. Repeated requests won't change the decision. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

List of Easy Company (506 PIR) veterans
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Endsord (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/List of Easy Company (506 PIR) veterans, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Author Frank Delaney.jpg
not my upload, but as a recent death I can make a case for it —Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * . The file description says simply "Photograph by Jerry Bauer, copyright owned by Frank Delaney" and nothing else. This would require permission from the copyright owner before we could restore it. And it is unlikely that Frank Delaney is actually the copyright owner, since he's the subject of the photo, and typically the photographer owns the copyright. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Soumik Datta
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Tana Wollen (talk) 10:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

I need to continue working on this. Became so disheartened and confused by the rejections that I gave up for a while. I need to get back to it and hope someone can help me with more specific instructions.

Wiki instructions are confusing. The instruction above says to 'click the Save page' button below.' There is a 'Save Changes' button but no 'Save page' button.

Tana Wollen


 * I have restored the draft. It looks like a reasonably good start to me, although I agree with the reviewer that the references need to be improved to demonstrate notability of the subject. Please read Golden rule to get an overview of what is expected. Note also that interviews are considered Primary sources and don't count as "coverage" of a subject. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Insomnia (College Festival)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Shrutijm (talk) 04:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Westfield Mount Druitt
Article was deleted in 2016 and was redirected to List of shopping centres in Australia. Please undelete and restore it or userfy it so I can work on it. —BugMenn (talk) 02:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * We don't have to restore anything for you to see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westfield_Mount_Druitt&oldid=717541221 . The deleted revisions are very minimal, with a two line stub from 2006. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Two Gentlemen of Verona (Forest).png
I want to replace the JPEG version with the PNG version. Also, I want to copy the descriptions of the JPEG file into PNG file for cleaner description. —George Ho (talk) 01:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Would it harm anything to do a history merge of the jpg to the png, so there's just one version of this thing? ~Anachronist (talk) 02:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * PNG and JPEG are two different image types. However, you can merge description history logs as long as image revisions are not merged. Is that possible? --George Ho (talk) 02:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Alternatively, I can copy and paste the descriptions into the PNG page. --George Ho (talk) 02:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please use and improve. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

R.B. Walsh / Risteárd B. Breathnach
I want to complete this entry —Believeingood (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It is not deleted, see Draft:R.B. Walsh (Risteárd Breathnach). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Kishore Buxani
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Djcohon (talk) 08:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

The original page was under the label Buxani which could have been confused with other names of developers. Page Kishore_Buxani did not use any sources from illegitimate media. Please reinstate the page
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Buxani, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Although the deletion was tagged with a G4, the AFD discussion did say to delete this page too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

List of Rise of the Robots characters
Please do not delete this page. —GrandMaster 20:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/List of Rise of the Robots characters, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Rise of the Robots (series)
Please do not delete this page. —GrandMaster 20:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This is not yet deleted. Give your reasons why it should not be deleted at Articles for deletion/Rise of the Robots (series). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example
Jph6t (talk) 21:20, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I restored: Draft:Bury Me In My Boots (album) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

es:Mi Cancion
My article https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi_Cancion was about a TV program for kids  that was a litle bit famous in my country. I´ve seen similar TV programs that have their pages in wikipedia. So I decided to create an article about it. I had some reference mistakes so it was deleted after 30 days. I understood it and then again I created a new article, and this time I made sure I add two references from newspapers to make it more accurate. But an administrator deliberately decided to delete this even after I fixed my error. Please restore this article. —Ilikepanama15 (talk) 23:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done English Wikipedia administrators cannot undelete pages at Spanish Wikipedia. I suggest that you contact the deletiing admin,, at es:User talk:Alelapenya. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Smash David
This article was just deleted because of a dispute with other editors a few months ago, but this article should be reconsidered now since Smash David accomplished much more now, with a single he produced for Big Sean, Bounce Back, which his Sean's highest charting single in the US at number 6 on the Billboard Hot 100 and certified Gold by the RIAA, and another single for Khalid, Location, which is at number 52 on the Billboard Hot 100, so clearly this article has passed WP:NMUSIC, so it should be undeleted. —Bloomdoom2 (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Smash David, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * They're not active on here, so I'm going to ping . I also have to caution you - producing isn't always a guarantee of notability, as a song or album can have a great many producers. Since one of those two songs were already on the article at the prior AfD, you'll really need to give them a lot of good sourcing to justify inclusion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see that the concerns at AFD have been met. I would recommend another discussion if undeletion is still desired. Jujutacular (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Programming_in_the_large_and_programming_in_the_small
This article was deleted for the following reason: "Expired PROD, concern was: single-sourced neologism largely sustained through wikipedia itself." However, a Google search for the article title returns several references to peer-reviewed Computer Science journals that use the term. Therefore, it seems that the concern about this article is Template:Refimprove. —CheeseInPosition (talk) 19:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Only Sun
My article about the band Only Sun was tagged for deletion and I was told I would have the chance to make changes to it. Before I could even start to make changes, it was deleted. Myself and the people who wrote the page did not even get a chance to start making appropriate changes to the article and given the chance would do them. We were in the process of gathering references when the page was deleted. I don't believe the reason it was deleted in the first place was fair and then not being able to even make changes, doesn't seem particularly fair either. —Vicksmithh (talk) 18:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You should ask the deleting administrator User talk:Deb.  Perhaps you can have this as a draft to give you more time. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Pixel Crunch
This shouldn't be deleted as it is a rapidly growing company and information will be added quite fast as they are expanding and are working with other big companies, this is an online company —Maxwell.mckay (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * There was not much of a claim of importance. Show that it is notable first by getting independent references before writing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Anton enus.jpg
I am the copyright holder and uploader of this image, but I do not use Wikipedia regularly enough to respond to a 7-day deletion review. Once the image is restored I can add metadata. —PabloZ (talk) 03:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Mukti Subedi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Muktivai (talk) 05:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do, the page is not deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

== T-ball History. The information on Claude Lewis organizing T-ball in 1958 in Warner Robins, GA was deleted without permission. We want it added back to the article. Lewis has recently received recognition from the GA Sports Hall Of Fame. contact ria25... ==

{{subst:refund|1= T-ball History |2= information on Claude Lewis organizing T-ball in 1958 in Warner Robins, GA has been deleted. No one had permission to delete this information, and we want to add it back to the article. Lewis is 90 years old and recently was recognized by the GA Sports Hall of Fame, was inducted into the GA Recreation and Parks Association Hall of Fame, and into the Warner Robins GA Hall of Fame. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:A60A:400:F960:B465:1637:E5B8 (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, person using IP address 2600:8807:A60A:400:F960:B465:1637:E5B8. Unfortunately, I can't help you yet, because I'm not sure what page you're talking about?  Could you give us the precise name of the page that was deleted?  Even a little difference in the title, such as a single letter being capitalized differently, will keep the page from showing up.  I checked T-ball History, but it's never existed; Claude Lewis was deleted, but that was in 2005 (the entire contents were Mayor of Carlsbad, California, not something related to T-ball), and your log of deleted contributions has nothing in it.  Nyttend (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VIPLE
I know I did not provide enough information last time but I was out of the country. Please undelete and let me prove and show why it is important for this page to be on Wikipedia! I have multiple contributors this time and am ready to provide much much more information this time. Also I am now much more similar with the WIKI guidelines so we should not have a problem this time. —Smengi94 (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Smengi94, the page was deleted through our Proposed Deletion process, and if someone asks for a proposed deletion to be undone, it's virtually always granted, so it's now visible again. Please add the improvements that you're talking about; undeleted pages can still be deleted through a deletion discussion, and if you don't improve it, you run the risk of someone trying to get it deleted that way.  Nyttend (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Kaplan
Ann Kaplan is Canadian business women and local celebrity who is on the television show Real Housewives or Toronto. —Cstainton (talk) 20:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It was deleted because of its promotional tone. Either you can ask the deleting administrator User talk:Bearcat to restore it, or you can rewrite it in less glowing terms so that it can stay here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Me Too.ogg, File:Better.ogg, File:Watch Me Do.ogg
Requesting to restore the aforementioned files. It seems like all these files comply with the criteria. Their captions had sufficient information to justify a sample and there were no copyright problems.--Shane Cyrus (talk) 12:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please use them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Nasir Khanjan
Maybe the previous version will be deleted having copyright content or having no notability criteria but what's wrong with this please do something for this I spend almost 3 hours by creating this —Wisalahmad523 (talk) 14:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Nasir Khanjan (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:John Baguley
''I, 2A02:C7F:5C22:B500:E887:AA10:D6AA:BF3F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2A02:C7F:5C22:B500:E887:AA10:D6AA:BF3F (talk) 17:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

''I, 2A02:C7F:5C22:B500:E887:AA10:D6AA:BF3F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2A02:C7F:5C22:B500:E887:AA10:D6AA:BF3F (talk) 17:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)