Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 263

Please restore from DELETION: Draft:Clean Energy Economy (G 13 (TW))
Daedalus67 (talk) 05:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Logic Financial Consultants
I wish to make changes, and include possible sources to verify the existent and information given about the company. —Gwhitby26 (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The purpose of Wikipedia is not to promote companies. If there are independent sources, perhaps you could start again at Draft:Logic Financial Consultants. There also needs to be a claim of importance, and I see none in the deleted page, so if it was restored it could be deleted under A7 as well. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Tee-ball. Contents. History. information deleted on Claude Lewis.  ClueBot deletion found between 14:38, 25 January 2016 and 15:32, 25 February 2016.
{{subst:refund|1= Tee-ball |2= Tee-ball table of Contents, History. The information on Claude Lewis beginning tee-ball in 1958 in Warner Robins, GA has been deleted by ClueBot. I found the deletion between 14:38,25 January 2016 and 15:32, 25 February 2016. We want the information added back into the article. Information after ClueBot states Reverting Possible Vandalism. Report False Positive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:A60A:400:F960:B465:1637:E5B8 (talk)
 * If you don't tell us what article you mean, nobody here will be able to help you. Nyttend (talk) 20:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I found a bit more in the edit summary: "The information on Claude Lewis organizing T-ball in 1958 in Warner Robins, GA was deleted without permission. We want it added back to the article. Lewis has recently received recognition from the GA Sports Hall Of Fame. contact ria25"
 * It looks like they're referring to this edit on the Tee-ball article, where someone removed content to center on just one person as an inventor. I have to caution the IP address that there is no WP:OWNERSHIP of the article and people can edit it at any point in time, however that said the listing of the various inventing claims seems to be at least partially justified since it's only a small group that is cited and the information doesn't favor one person over the other. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  22:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * I've re-added the content to the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  22:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Mughal conquest of Chittagong
retrieving WP:G5 deletion —Prisencolin (talk) 08:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You should be asking User talk:SpacemanSpiff who deleted it.  I can confirm that the user that wrote it was a sock of a blocked user, so we really need a reason why this should be restored, or a least a claim that you want to take responsibility. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If it's anything more than a stub, then I feel it's worth recovering. If it's not, then nevermind.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It would be a start class article. How will you check and take responsibility? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Azamara Club Cruises
I wanted this page restored again because I believe it was again unfairly deleted. This is an information about a cruise line and its vessels are still sailing with the cruise line and I believe the page should be restored again because there is still information about it. —Angelgreat (talk) 23:59, 27, February 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Azamara Club Cruises, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  01:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Mukti Subedi (2)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Muktivai (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC) DON'T DELETE THAT PAGE
 * , it is deleted and is not eligible for restoration by request. It also seems to be a duplicate of Mukti Mohan. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

MALKA (musician)
MALKA is a successful female artist with radio play on BBC 6music, BBC Scotland, syncs on Degrassi, Scream 4, Skins and Catfish and reviews in The Independent, The Line of Best Fit and Drowned in Sound and should have a Wikipedia page.

Some links below:

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/malka-reveals-video-for-breakout-premiere-a7558511.html

https://www.thelineofbestfit.com/new-music/discovery/malka-breakout — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamkalolo (talk • contribs) 20:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Fatima Convent High School
ksinkar (talk) 17:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Eclipse Jazz
recently received national music magazine, downbeat, article on eclipse jazz which should provide sufficient citations for publication — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annreb (talk • contribs) 17:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Domenic Johansson custody case
Article deleted at AfD (Articles for deletion/Domenic Johansson custody case) in 2013 because it failed WP:GNG. Since then, it has attracted (more) coverage in reliable sources, such as this book and this Le Figaro article. Please userfy and allow me to expand the article. —StAnselm (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:StAnselm/Domenic Johansson custody case. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

anna ciddor
want to work on the article and get it published —Retengineer (talk) 02:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

JTField/sandbox
I made my account for a class I'm enrolled in at UMD. It is called INST201, the introductory course to InfoSci. I'm not sure why I had my page deleted; it had things my professor was grading on it and I do not know what to do here to receive my credit because someone else deleted my own personal notes page, or my "Sandbox." The assignment is merely checking my contributions to a Wikipedia page. I recently edited the SEO, Search engine optimization, Wiki page. Anything else on there was work that had yet to be graded. —JTField (talk) 03:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:48, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Whatisthismagic/sandbox
The content on my page was an outline of what my group members and I were intending to add. We are editing an article in compliance with a class and as a group project we had dedicated my sandbox to be our group page as we started on a draft. The information on there was not ready for publication but was the layout of what we needed to accomplish.. It was my understanding that the sandbox could be used for this initial, fine tuning purpose —Whatisthismagic (talk) 06:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:48, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Incestophobia
The article was incomplete and placed on wikipedia for editing and advice from wiki experts.Wiki said it might take 6 months or more before it was even looked at so I thought I had lots of time to add my bibliography and references. I got no email stating my work was going to be deleted from the sandbox, and this has caused me much chagrin and time lost trying to find my latest edited version. I hope you will put it back. Best regards. Richard Morris — Preceding unsigned comment added by IzaacAbe (talk • contribs) 06:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like this was deleted by via WP:U5, misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost, and was nominated by . I've pinged RHaworth to this discussion to see if he'll restore it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Actually, I'll go ahead and restore this since it was meant to be an AfC article. Offhand though, the article contains a lot of WP:OR, so you'll need to work on that. It also doesn't have any sourcing that I can see - you need in-line citations. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I had doubts the OP would return which is why I nominated this for CSD as webhosting. But now that they have I should raise secondary issue of serious but fixable copyright violations. &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 07:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hmm... it looks like they aren't copying without attribution, as they seem to be putting things in quotations and showing where it's from, but these quotes are particularly large and should be minimized - although they also should not use blogs as a source to begin with, as one of these is a blog. Another is urban dictionary, which shouldn't be used as a source either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You are right again. I stand corrected.
 * I apologize. I did not mean to discourage you from editing. You should know that it should not take 6 months for a review. 6 Weeks maybe but not 6 months. I have had articles reviewed in minutes sometimes. But several declined tags will make your draft look very suspicious. I would suggest waiting till you have a good quality formatted draft before submitting. &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 07:35, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Andrew Duplantis
76.72.32.50 (talk) 19:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

No reasoning given. —Williamfbailey (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I restored this for you in 2015 and no improvements were made to the page at all. What do you intend to do this time ? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Undeletion of an article/Victor Ike
Undeletion of an article/Victor Ike —Tracy Williams (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Hi! I wrote an article about an artist Victor Ike, whom i believe has a good profil that merits to be on wikipedia, it was delected by CYP and when i contacted him for the reason of the article delection, he told me that it was voted for delection by some sect of people and directed me here to make a request for undeletion of the article. please could you kindly undelete my article? cos i believe the artist article merits to be here on wikipedia. and if there are corrections to be made on the article, you are free to let me know or assist in correcting them but not deleting my article. Thanks
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Victor Ike, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. There is no point in a deletion review unless there are sources like magazines or newspapers available. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Also I assume that the request to restore an article about your namesake American professional wrestler is unintended. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Mroselogo.jpg
I recently changed the status of the logo to PD as the logo is too simple for copyright. Previous revisions should be undeleted. —George Ho (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have changed one revision only, the other two are different, and copyright would apply to these. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Scholarships.com
The page I created, like several others I have created before or since, is referenced from another Wikipedia page. I was creating the page and adding to it, learning the ins and outs of creating and editing wikipedia entries and attempting to get help from the community. There are several Wikipedia entries of very similar substance and style that may have a note on them asking for edits from members, but mine just keeps getting deleted. I do not understand why it keeps getting deleted rather than the community on Wikipedia helping to add to it or better it, as I see is happening on so many entries. I have learned a bit over the last few weeks through reading and trial and error. I would like to opportunity to "try try again". —WonLove (talk) 22:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC) WonLove (talk) 22:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * . Having been deleted as a result of (a) a deletion discussion, (b) due to unambiguous promotion and (c) lack of evidence of notability, it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page.
 * Please don't use the main article space for practice. Instead, work on drafts in your sandbox or in draft space, such as Draft:Scholarships.com. And then submit your article for review via Articles for creation if you want help and advice on how the article should be improved.
 * Note also that the existence of other articles that may not be acceptable is not a reason to add yet another one, it may be a reason to delete those. WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't a valid argument to keep or restore content. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:53, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

James White (basketball, born 1993)
The player is active again and is playing in the same team he played before. Article is only deleted by expired BLPPROD for unsourced BLP, not by any CSD criterion and I intend to do work to that page. —Baby miss fortune 11:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Lectonar (talk) 12:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Hubert Girault.jpg
OTRS request was sent. Ticket#2017022010010031 —TiberiusRufus (talk) 11:18, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * In this case we wait for the OTRS ticket to be evaluated to see what it says. As the image was labelled fair use, and it was not fair, it won't be restored.  However if the OTRS ticket comes from the photographer and is granting a free license then it could be restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Music of Junk
''I, 185.46.137.18, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 185.46.137.18 (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

I will continue to work on the article —185.46.137.18 (talk) 20:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Mundo Reader
I think the speedy deletion of Mundo Reader is an error. I would like to ask for it's undeletion and for a regular deletion procedure. Also I would like to ask for copying Mundo Reader and Tempo (retailer) somewhere in my user pages, so I can try to improve them. Thanks. —  Ark25  (talk) 21:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Have you asked User:Vanamonde93 about this yet? I am inclined to agree with you on Mundo Reader as it was nominated for deletion by a WP:SPA. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * For Tempo (retailer) you should ask User:Sarahj2107 first as she was the deleter based on Articles for deletion/Tempo (retailer). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * - I have moved Tempo (retailer) to User:Ark25/Tempo (retailer) so you can work on it. Please do not move it back to main space until all the concerns raised in the deletion discussion are addressed. Sarahj2107 (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll ask Vanamonde93 about Mundo Reader. Thanks for all the kind answers! —  Ark25  (talk) 22:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

R.B. Walsh (Risteárd Breathnach)
''I, Believeingood, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Believeingood (talk) 07:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It is not deleted, your sandbox was renamed, see Draft:R.B. Walsh (Risteárd Breathnach). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you know why it was renamed,, or how I can access it apart from clicking on the link you gave me? When I look at my sandbox, it's empty. Believeingood (talk) 00:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It was renamed because it was part of WP:AFC. Once you submit them, they will likely be moved to the draft space. We can make your sand box a WP:Redirect, but there is no point, you can click on that link. I would suggest that you add the Draft:R.B. Walsh (Risteárd Breathnach) text to your user page, then you can find it again easily.  Another way to find it is to click on "my contributions" and then you can see all you have done on Wikipedia with your logon. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I see. Many thanks for that . There's a lot to get to grips with. Ought I to be signing this or is that unnecessary?

Tanjung Api Airport
I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —Adelina Arsova (talk) 00:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are not a reappearance of Joanna Gunadi, I would suggest that you start again. The only text said "Tanjung Api Airport is an airport in Ampana, Indonesia. " with a source of http://www.gcmap.com/airport/AMP Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Douglas Blair Turnbaugh
''I, Douglas Turnbaugh, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Douglas Turnbaugh (talk) 02:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" If you are the subject of this draft, please also take a look at WP:autobiography. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Vivian McPeak
Ready to add sources —Pyrodney (talk) 04:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please add sources soon. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:29, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Artist Publishing Group
Artist Publishing Group

I feel that the page, due to my edits, is purposely being targeted by hateful users. I have no affiliation with the company, I simply saw a section on Mike Caren's page and decided to fill it. I have filled the page with credible information from Billboard and other credible music news sources, the official APG website was only used once, therefore, I do not understand why the page is continuously being flagged and deleted. It is in no way a page used for promotion and I am doing my best to abide to all Wikipedia rules. Please advise on how to move forward and publish the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ab34hj788 (talk • contribs)


 * This user repeatedly ignored the advice to read the policy about notability of companies, prominently linked in the notability-Companies tag placed on their article. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Artist Publishing Group, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Woman’s City Club of Greater Cincinnati
''I, 4.15.98.130, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 4.15.98.130 (talk) 19:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:30, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Geoscientists Canada
''I, Rkumargeo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rkumargeo (talk) 23:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Feminist Five
''I, Gobonobo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' gobonobo  + c 00:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Zaskia Gotik
I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —Adelina Arsova (talk) 00:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like one version of this was deleted as A7, but the other was deleted as G5 - a sockpuppet evading a block. I'm pinging and, the former since he deleted the page and the latter since they have dealt with the SPI. No offense meant, but we need to make sure that you're not a new sock. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done I took a look at more of their edits and it seems like a WP:DUCK situation now, so I've blocked them. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Gamaliel Audrey Cantika
I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —Adelina Arsova (talk) 00:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * See my comment above, we need to be sure that this isn't a sockpuppet. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Cakra Khan
I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —Adelina Arsova (talk) 07:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I've opened up an SPI, as I'd like to have the question of whether or not you're a sockpuppet evading a block answered before anything gets restored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Vino G. Bastian
I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —Adelina Arsova (talk) 07:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * See my above comment. I would recommend against making any new requests at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

The Voice Kids Indonesia
I would like the page to be restored to my userspace so the article can be improved. —Adelina Arsova (talk) 09:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I've opened an SPI against this account, as they've requested many articles that were deleted due to sockpuppetry. I'd recommend against restoring anything until that closes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

William_Inglis_and_Sons_Pty_Ltd
''I, Rod mcinnes, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rod mcinnes (talk) 01:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Reincubate
''I, 109.154.247.179, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 109.154.247.179 (talk) 08:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Driving reinvestment in research and development and responsible antibiotic use
''I, Victoria wells, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Victoria wells (talk) 10:42, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

I would like to restore the draft article so that I can make edits and add references now that there are more references available. Once the references are added I would like to re-submit the article. —Victoria wells (talk) 10:45, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mount French School
''I, Kerry Raymond, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Kerry (talk) 04:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

I will work with User:Lastlion0 who created the draft to improve it or whatever is most appropriate —Kerry (talk) 04:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Muhammaed Yasir Ahmed Taher
He is in the news again, under the name "Yasir al-Silmi". I request that history be merged to Mohamed Tahar. —Geo Swan (talk) 04:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, histories merged. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Les Newman OAM
''I, Cini gra, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Cini gra (talk) 13:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AnyFileBackup
''I, Count Andrew, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Count Andrew (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please note it has been restored to Draft:AnyFileBackup as AFC drafts are no longer hosted as sub-pages of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Credihealth
CSD A7 states "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance." But the article claims with reliable sources: Credihealth "launched an around-the-clock ambulance request service in Gurgaon, the first of it's kind in India where ambulatory medical care is unreliable." yahoo article, https://www.yahoo.com/news/credihealth-introduces-24-hour-ambulance-083214069.html.

Three articles that cover Credihealth:  Business Standard India: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/how-credihealth-helps-you-choose-the-right-doctor-115092400317_1.html

The Economic Times: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/credihealth-perfiniti-folksvagn-shaadi-e-khaas-four-start-ups-with-innovative-ideas/articleshow/32089651.cms

Yahoo News: https://www.yahoo.com/news/credihealth-introduces-24-hour-ambulance-083214069.html

Credihealth is one the oldest healthcare player in India, It has 1000's of doctors on his platform. You can check some of doctors under Credihealth on Wikipedia, Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=100&offset=0&profile=default&search=Credihealth&searchToken=ekv0xd29ktg0jx5wahxdw1qyf

I would request you to please recheck the article and un-delete it. Also would like to please have a full discussion about this article. — — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kahonaakaho (talk • contribs) 01:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This is an unconfessed paid advertisement motivated by the company, as shown at Draft:Credihealth, which is currently nominated as such, and also the article being deleted for the same criteria: Self-advertising. The sources above, with easy examination, show clear labels showing the company as the author, including using their own company-hosted words. Wikipedia is not the place to advertise and that's exactly why, so restarting or resubmitting is not an alternative. As a precaution, I gave the user one final warning to cease self-advertising earlier today and, as for the full discussion, they are aware of the MfD linked above; the Yahoo! link itself is a labeled press release, and this wouldn't satisfy our simplest standards. SwisterTwister   talk  03:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is open source platform with lakhs of information being shared every day with lakhs of people. Firstly I am not at all associated with Credihealth or any such company, Kindly verify the edits going on from my iP as compare to Company IP if you have any. Secondly, If you verify other References available on Deleted page they are referring Geniune News from popular Indian media. I accept That ambulance part has missing proper Ref. but scope of improvement is there, If you will please allow me to do so. Thirdly and most importantly, I am not paid anything by anyone. I just copied draft from Draft:Credihealth Modified some data and then published it. Please let me know what part of article you find advertising, I will Improve that part from my end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kahonaakaho (talk • contribs) 04:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
 * I don't see being the first ambulance service in a town as a credible claim of significance either. It may be significant to that locality, but every city has an ambulance service that could claim to be "first" in that city, and we don't write articles about each of them just because of that. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Anachronist: It is first one in whole India, which is seventh largest country in world. So this is significant to a country.--Eliteal1122 (talk) 08:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:James MacDonald
''I, TeepTeep, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' TeepTeep (talk) 04:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Brad Delaney
Just looking to have the article sent to my sandbox as the deleter said that they would not do it and that here was the place to request such an action. —Fleets (talk) 19:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Fleets/Brad Delaney. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks.Fleets (talk) 18:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Jonathan Grado
A few years back I ended up investing more time than expected into this article after reading an interview with Jonathan Grado in Esquire Magazine. I thought I'd be writing more articles, but life happens and I ended up with one article I'm proud of. I recently saw the subject of this page on a tv show and thought I'd check on the article, only to find it was deleted. I'm not too sure why it was deleted, but with all the credible sources I had gathered from film and print (WIRED magazine, New York Times, TechCrunch from what I remember) I don't really see why this was removed. Some Googling brought me to a recent commercial American Express had featured him in as well. I'd be happy to update sources if need be. —Jennifer.roselyn (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like part of the PROD rationale was that it was promotional sounding, so I'm going to transfer this to your userspace for you to work on. It's likely the quotes, since those are used pretty frequently. You can find this at User:Jennifer.roselyn/Jonathan Grado. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  21:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

File:WSP Square Logo Trademarked (4) (1).png
I am new to Wikipedia and was unsure of what to put under "non-free content criteria". Now that I have become better acquainted, I wish to submit this photo under the justification that it meets all 10 Wikipedia requirements for usage, and in adding the tag to the photo itself. As this is the official logo for the organization for which I am editing a page, there is no free equivalent. Its usage will not infringe on the intended commercial opportunities for it. The photo will only be used once, in finalizing and publishing Draft:Warrior-Scholar Project, and has been published multiple times both on the Warrior-Scholar Project webpage, and in various news articles. Should the image be restored, I will personally edit the description page in order to reflect a better understanding of the non-free use rationale, with all necessary information provided. —96.95.24.97 (talk) 20:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * One of the non free content rules says that non free media can only be used on articles. So it cannot be used on a draft. When the page becomes an article you are welcome to have this restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Secondly the user name that uploaded the logo was "Wspsocial2017". User names here must represent individuals and not organisations. You could be "person from WSP" instead.  If you register and you are paid by WSP take a read of WP:Paid editing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Patient Zero
Would just like my user page reinstated, still on indef wikibreak but looking back I didn't really want to delete my userpage. —Patient Zerotalk 10:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Andre Duza
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —2601:43:0:4AE0:303A:D0B3:A8B7:7AD7 (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Andre Duza, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Einar Kuusk
This article was recreated after previous deletions. Can anyone please undelete the deleted revisions of this article? — GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 02:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This looks like a ripe candidate for deletion to me in spite of three AFDs. I see no evidence of meeting WP:NACTOR criteria for inclusion, and I'm surprised the point was neither made nor refuted in the AFD discussions. Being "mentioned" in sources doesn't confer notability, and neither does routine coverage. I have no objection to restoring the history, but the deletion of this should have way more intelligent, policy-grounded discussion than has happened yet. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Good Shepherd English School
Please do restore the article. It is one of the 3 CBSE schools in Karaikal port city. It has its one significance. Many students who studied there made a record like a twins studying in the school for the first time in India got the black belt in Karate.--wiki tamil 100 (talk) 09:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This was deleted at AfD in March of last year by and was taken to deletion review a few days after that, where  closed it as no consensus. I've tagged both of them to this request, but the general gist is that this isn't something that can be restored through REFUND and you'd almost certainly have to go through deletion review if you want to argue that the article should have been kept. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have no particular opinion on whether this should be restored, other than to agree with Tokyogirl79 that this is the wrong forum, for the reasons stated. WP:REFUND is for pages [...] that were uncontroversially deleted, and this is clearly not that.  -- RoySmith (talk)

Nicholas Wooldridge
Can provide additional data to support the subject —159.147.173.91 (talk) 09:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This looks like it was deleted twice per user request and at one point was moved to User:Janweh64/Nicholas Wooldridge as per a request by its creator, . There is a little bit of article history that wasn't included in the move, so I've merged that with the other article in case Janweh could use it. Since it is in another users's userspace I'd recommend checking in with Janweh64 before making any edits just to see what his plans are. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I will transfer it back to draft. I was preserving in case someone was interested in future. &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 06:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Bandicam
Please visit https://www.google.com/search?q=bandicam%20wikipedia I have no idea why I can't find the Bandicam page on en.wikipedia.org. Someone must have made a mistake. You can see the Bandicam page in different languages such as https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam, https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/반디캠, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam, https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam, https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/باندي_كام, https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam and https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/แบนดิแคม I believe that Bandicam is notable enough to go into en.wikipedia.org. —Zune2000 (talk) 08:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done It was deleted via WP:PROD, so it can be restored here. As far as it existing on other foreign language Wikipedias, be careful since notability guidelines can differ greatly depending on the guidelines for that particular language and the English WP tends to be the most strict of the group. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Johnny Bullet
Hervé Utoro (talk) 11:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Swiss Draw in Ultimate Frisbee
''I, Cschff, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Cschff (talk) 15:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Khojaly Massacre recognition
I will place some information from that deleted article here —Interfase (talk) 06:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Khojaly Massacre recognition (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. I am assuming you meant Khojaly Massacre recognition as there does not appear to be a draft:Khojaly anything around. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


 * , referred them here so I think that he's OK with sending this to userspace - it's just not something he personally does. I've pinged him to see what he thinks. I would argue that the Khojaly massacre memorials page could probably be merged into the main article as well and edited down for brevity, perhaps just a list of each country that has a memorial, with the only exceptions being where the memorial is especially controversial or noteworthy - ie, where the memorial itself would possibly warrant its own page or where the coverage is very, very extensive and goes beyond stories about it being built and notifications of opening ceremonies and such. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * However I've pinged him here just to make sure that this is what he meant by sending them here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That's right. Thanks for the ping.  Sandstein   15:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Interfase/Khojaly Massacre recognition. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:SCAD Diving
Hi, unfortunately I missed the opportunity to carry my work on the draft and forgot about the 6 month rule. I would like to contiue. I only got a reminder today, but the draft had already been deleted :-( please restore! —Scad Diver (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)