Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 265

Defance, Ohio (band)
Meets the criteria in 'Wikipedia:Notability (music) Criteria for musicians and ensembles' numbers match up with numbers in notability guide.

1. Defiance, Ohio has three full length albums and an EP released on No Idea Records, an EP on Plan-It-X Records, and Anti-Creative Records and several other releases on less notable lables. Their only self release was their fist album and demo.

4. They've had several international tours of the USA, Canada, Australia, Europe and Iceland. Here's a few announcements I found on google. https://www.punknews.org/article/48584/tours-defiance-ohio-spoonboy-east-coast

https://www.punknews.org/article/42909/tours-defiance-ohio-nana-grizol-your-heart-breaks-toby-foster https://www.punknews.org/article/32477/defiance-ohio-new-relese-tour-dates http://thepunksite.com/news/defiance-ohio-announces-tour-in-support-of-new-full-length/

7. Defiance, Ohio was one of the largest bands in the wave of folk punk in the mid/late 00's and had a large influence in the Bloomington punk scene. —Evanw (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Softdelete challenged. Please add some regular references. You can also remove the notability tag. PS Page was at Defiance, Ohio (band) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:36, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Micropolis (company)
The article was PRODed last month stating it was about a non-notable topic and completely unreferenced. While I don't know if that article contained any valuable information (already), the topic (a former company in the disk drive and operating system business) is clearly notable and needs to be covered by us for historic reasons. Being unreferenced is not normally a valid reason for deletion if notability is given and the article meets at least stub-class. Therefore I request undeletion. —Matthiaspaul (talk) 13:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Priam Corporation
The article was PRODed last month stating it was about a non-notable topic and completely unreferenced. While I don't know if that article contained any valuable information, the topic (a former company in the disk drive business and IIRC also of disk related software or operating systems) is notable and needs to be covered by us for historic reasons. Being unreferenced is not normally a valid reason for deletion if notability is given and the article meets at least stub-class. Therefore I request undeletion —Matthiaspaul (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It's a bit late to challenged the prod, and it was done already. You must have missed Articles for deletion/Priam Corporation. Anyway since I too think we should have such an article I have moved it to a draft at Draft:Priam Corporation so you can properly show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Kalok
Yet another article PRODed last month by the same nominator stating it would be about a non-notable topic and unreferenced. I don't know if that article contained any valuable information (already), but the topic (another former disk drive vendor) is notable enough to have some entry in order to better cover the history of micro-computing. Again, being unreferenced is not a valid reason in itself for deletion unless the article doesn't meet at least stub-class or would be about a non-notable topic. Therefore I request undeletion. —Matthiaspaul (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:AlternaScript
''I, AmILab, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' AmILab (talk) 14:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

4Story
The article was deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7. Please userfy it because I want to improve it. —Gheoan (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * In this case you should ask the deleting admin user talk:DGG as it was deleted with A7, no claim of importance for a web content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpl_(company)
The article was initially put up by someone who said they'd help. Wasn't aware that he ran a mass advertising farm. All the information in the page are sourced from reputed Indian and international news sites. —Roshansam (talk) 03:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ Although this was deleted by a PROD, the creation by a banned user speedy delete criterion still applies. So if I restored it, I would have to delete it again immediately. If you are not a reincarnation of a banned user you can recreate the page. You can still appeal this with User:Premeditated Chaos or using WP:DRV though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Samuel Ogden Edison, Jr
''I, Vansh Bhardwaj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' NeonLightsDiscoDude 05:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

I would like to use more articles to write more text. I was away at the time of deletion. —NeonLightsDiscoDude 05:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hi User:Vansh Bhardwaj, can you please make a link to your user talk page in your signature to help us to talk to you? The page is actually at Draft:Samuel Ogden Edison, Jr. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

GNSS FATIMA
Article recently deleted per authors request, while I remember reading it as informative. There are also several internal links pointing to it. The article possibly warrants expansion to discuss the general concept of a Martian satellite navigation system, including other sources and other concepts. —— JFG talk 08:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please note that Articles for deletion/GNSS FATIMA is still in progress, and I suggest that you contribute to the discussion there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

dont bite the newbies!
Who is deleting sandboxs. This seems carazy. Victuallers (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't host spam! "...the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service." We also delete attack pages, copyvios, etc. And this really should be on the talk page. --Neil N  talk to me 16:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Environmental Irrigation
''I, 101.165.7.220, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 101.165.7.220 (talk) 00:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Niv Horesh
entry has existed for several years and is linking with an important and growing body of work by the author —31.210.180.117 (talk) 08:39, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nick Z Marino
Nickzmarino (talk) 18:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note that Wikipedia articles have to be based on facts already published, not on what you know. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

ANISH KUSHWAHA
Enter your reasoning here it doesn't look good I will put another one and then click the "Save page" button below —Anishkushwaha (talk) 13:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ In the case of User:Anishkushwaha, Wikipedia is not a social networking site. There are other web siteslike Facebook or LinkedIn suited for this purpose. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ZAxploitation
''I, S.A.MovieManiac, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' S.A.MovieManiac (talk) 14:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jaroslav Čejka
''I, Yak~cswiki, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Yak~cswiki (talk) 17:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Zero Point Module
Just a request for information at this time: what deleted or non-existent page did it redirect to? — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 22:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * It redirected to Ancient technology in Stargate. Content in the page was merged on 21 September 2008. It had a big history as an article before then, as did the talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Would you userfy Zero Point Module ( unless Ancient technology in Stargate contained far superior information or sourcing on the topic; in which case, I can ask the AfD closer to userfy it for me unless you feel comfortable doing so ) to User:Godsy/Zero Point Module? I'm considering adding something about the fictional device to Technology in Stargate, and redirecting the term there to answer the over 30 red links that currently exist. I'll make sure to handle the history appropriately if I copy from it. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 00:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Godsy/Zero Point Module. It could do with better sourceing, not just primary, unreliable, or sources that don't mention it! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Adhitia Sofyan
Enter The page was deleted due to claims on no existence of notability, where there is some. —Jordi Rossell (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a X mark.svg Not done since this looks to be an obvious sock. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Clinton_Keith
''I, 2600:1011:B103:10C:C4A3:B1DF:143D:BF7A, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2600:1011:B103:10C:C4A3:B1DF:143D:BF7A (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Although the page was nominated for deletion hastily, it was an A7 not a G13 delete. In other words there was no claim of importance and little content. What was there started "Clinton Keith is a former video game developer and a Certified Scrum Trainer and agile coach" by Jouster66. I suggest that you look for sources of information first that can show WP:Notability.  If they exist you can start again at Draft:Clinton Keith where you will have more time to gewt the page ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)


 * There looks to have been more content at Draft:Clinton Keith, so it might be worthwhile to restore that if they return to this page. I'll ping since this was likely him posting. It looks like there was an attempt to remove the G13 tag at the draft article, but it was restored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mohammed Amin Kholwadia
''I, Officedepot00, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Officedepot00 (talk) 04:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Kishva Ambigapathy
This is a page being administered by the Royal Commonwealth Society on the elected youth Chairperson of the worlds largest and most diverse organisation, Commonwealth Youth Council. The data is in process of uploading and especially after his numerous involvement and awards in the Commonwealth. We are hoping that we can put back up this page. thanks. and then click the "Save page" button below —Rcsyouthmalaysia (talk) 08:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Kishva Ambigapathy, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Also please be aware that Wikipedia usernames are not allowed to represent organisations, but only individuals. So please change your user name, as it sounds like a club name. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Dr Jayanti Prasad Nautiyal
This page was deleted for want of Third party proof. Now the proof is submitted as under "Save page" button below —Aajpn (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Awards/Certifications:

http://www.limcabookofrecords.in/record-detail.aspx?rid=170 http://www.iibf.org.in/iib_cpdsuccessfullcan.asp

References Hindi wikipedia http://napshindi.blogspot.in/2015/10/drjayanti-prasad-nautiyal.html

Books/Articles written: http://www.amazon.in/Hindi-Pratinidhi-Kahaniyan-Taatvik-Vivechan/dp/8188118982/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1485857952&sr=1-1 https://www.sapnaonline.com/shop/Author/jayanti-prasad-nautiyal https://www.flipkart.com/sahitya-vivechan/p/itmdf88j4dkp34jp http://www.hindibook.com/index.php?p=sr&Uc=HB-22604 http://jainbookagency.com/booksearch.aspx?aname=Jayanti%20Prasad%20Nautiyal http://14.139.122.36/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=10839 http://rajbhasha.nic.in/sites/default/files/corp-nautiyal.pdf http://nationallibrary.gov.in/showdetails.php?id=546818 http://www.sanskritiuk.com/hindi_language.php http://www.amanprakashan.com/catelogue14.php http://kgpbooks.com/author/497

News Clippings: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Hindi-topples-Mandarin-as-widely-spoken-language/articleshow/46078856.cms http://www.thehindu.com/2005/03/06/stories/2005030610530300.htm http://www.abhivyakti-hindi.org/snibandh/hindi_diwas/hindiphirpahlesthanper.htm

Key Note addresses at Universities: http://cutn.ac.in/department-of-hindi/eminent-scholar-visitors/ http://www.milagrescathedralkallianpur.com/news_view.php?id=97


 * FTR: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jayanti Prasad Nautiyal. Various WP articles have been spammed with the person's name, website, and/or fringe linguistic theories over the past few years. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. --bonadea contributions talk 10:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * ❌ There has not been an article called Jayanti Prasad Nautiyal or Dr Jayanti Prasad Nautiyal. You have no deleted contributions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Jasbant Kaur aka Jasmine Kaur


This is not a sockpocket account however it uses a shared PC and credidentials may be same in terms of IP. Can I verify via email address? Kumar679 (talk) 23:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ As for the Jasmine Kaur article, it will not be restored. It was blanked by the author, and prior to that was a promotion of  Jasmine Kaur's ideas. It is possible to prove that you are a known person by using email to the WP:OTRS team, and after that the user page of a person can then be associated with a real person, with some sort of proof. However this is not a requirement. People are discouraged from writing an AUTOBIOGRAPHY. I don't think it would be possible to prove you are not another user by email, as it is too easy to make up a new email address. The only way would be if you are already another well known person who has their email identified on the internet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Eric Draven (wrestler)
This article was actually deleted under WP:PROD twice, with no intermediate undeletion. Well, for future improvement, the article should be undeleted and draftified to Draft:Eric Draven (wrestler). —24.205.24.240 (talk) 01:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It looks OK to be improved as an article anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Camellia Posoncuy
''I, Aljolar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Aljolar (talk) 06:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

We are now working on improving Camellia Posoncuy's profile. The project took a backseat as we were busy with other matters. —Aljolar (talk) 06:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * , can you clarify on the use of the term "we"? Shared accounts are not permitted per Wikipedia's guidelines. Also, you will need to disclose any WP:COI that you may have in this situation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Siddhant Vats
The article is of a notable Indian entrepreneur who started an Android Smartwatch company. There has been a lot of online hate by spammers lately against Mr. Vats and I had been following it closely and I am guessing someone reported false things to an Administrator who deleted it. I was in touch with the admin who deleted it and they said "in-depth coverage of a topic. Mr. Vats seems to have become briefly of media interest in early 2013 for starting a company intending to release a smartwatch, but there is no further coverage of him or his company that I can see. Even his company's website is defunct. I don't think there is a basis for maintaining his article on Wikipedia."

This was the original link of the article for your reference - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siddhant_Vats — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronks123 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

It's interesting to note the biased opinion of the administrator as, yes, Mr. Vats is one of the founders of the company and that's why it was widely covered by all the leading International publications such as CNET, TechCrunch, London Evening Standard, Times of India etc. to name a few, and it followed all guidelines of wikipedia to have notable references. The administrator deleted the page saying "starting a company intending to release a smartwatch", whereas the company was launched and widely covered in all media articles in the references, and the reason there is no website now as the company was closed later and Mr. Vats left it.

So, the administrator lacks knowledge of the company and Mr. Vats and deleted it without proper knowledge. So, I would like to respectfully request you for your kind consideration to restore the page of a notable Indian entrepreneur who has not only contributed so much in the technology sector, but if you are able to access the previous wikipedia page, you will see all the references of his work in the non profit sector towards the society.

I request you to kindly help either restoring the page completely or send me a copy of the wikipedia article and I can add more references if you prefer for republishing.

Thank you. Regards

Ronks123 (talk) 16:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Ronks123


 * In your prod notice, you requested to be pinged. Restoring the article would effectively be de-prodding it, so as a courtesy I'd like to give you an opportunity to respond. It will be restored, because that's the procedure here, so you might consider proposing it at AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I was just about to restore it, but I see it's already been restored as an expired PROD by User:Huon. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have restored it and sent it to a full deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Siddhant Vats. Huon (talk) 22:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Score (Carol Lloyd album)
I honestly do not know why this page was deleted. A different album by the same artist (Love Carol) was nominated for deletion per A9 and was deleted, yet this article (that I believe was up to standards and was even nominated as a GAN) was as well without any prior notice or warning. I'm requesting this article for undeletion primarily because being the page's sole contributor, I was completely caught off guard by the action; I don't want to play the experienced card, but I've written my fair share of music-related articles and have never had a page deleted before (especially like this). I've asked the admin why he deleted the page but he/she hasn't replied to my question. Thank you, Carbrera (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC). —Carbrera (talk) 02:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Carbrera/sandbox7.
 * Per policy, articles about songs are speedily deleted in accordance with WP:A9 when there is no article about the artist. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

User:August Joseph Faber
''I, August Joseph Faber, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' August Joseph Faber (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done That wasn't deleted under WP:CSD, it was deleted under WP:CSD. Wikipedia is not to be used as a web host for personal essays unrelated to Wikipedia. There is no benefit to the project in restoring this page. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

User:Iambic Pentameter
I self-requested deletion under CSD U1 since this is my user page. Having thought about it, this isn't really what I wanted to do (I'd like to have the old revisions restored) and I will probably redirect the page to my user talk for now until I'm happy with what I want on the page. Sorry for the inconvenience this may have caused — Iambic Pentameter (talk / contribs) 17:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Done --Neil N  talk to me 20:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Anstalin
It is a real person and unpublicity social worker —Gandhi (talk) 10:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done You will have to create an acceptable draft via WP:AFC. --Neil N  talk to me 20:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Air US
''I, The garmine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' The garmine  (talk)  13:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Honda CB125 TD Superdream
''I, Eagleash, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Eagleash (talk) 15:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:MDSupplies and Service
''I, 2600:1:D104:8A4E:9C24:DF41:52F0:91B8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2600:1:D104:8A4E:9C24:DF41:52F0:91B8 (talk) 15:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Olivier Fleury
''I, JC2033, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' JC2033 (talk) 15:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

a prominent person, author, social activist, organisational director with worldwide impact in the field of Christianity among oecumenical dialog and collaboration for the unity of different denominations such as Greek Orthodox church, Roman Catholic church, Reformed church, Anglican and Evangelical church. The draft article requires more sources, however many are in French which may not have been understood by reviewers, other articles and sources are still arriving, please be patient —JC2033 (talk) 15:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Adrian Doherty
Eki1001 (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:IF Management
''I, Michaelsones, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Michaelsones (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

AlexNet
I am not able to have a look into the deleted article, but if it covers the convolutional neural network from Krizhevsky et al, 2012 (Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks) this may be a very bad decision. The reasoning for deletion was "Can't find any references that do more than simply mention AlexNet in passing". A quick search on google scholar gives over 10000 citations which is a lot for a scientific paper. To put this into perspective, Claude Shannons paper defining the fundamental bandwith limits of analog to digital conversion only has 7228 citations. Furthermore, AlexNet has been implemented for most if not all of the popular machine learning frameworks, including Tensorflow(1), Caffe(2) and Theano(3) —C-M ?! 21:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. There isn't much to that article, though. Just 2 sentences. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Marques "Merk Murphy" Elliston
Edit to include updated resources —Vebra123 (talk) 02:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rajeev Gupta
''I, Prabhat 9, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Prabhat 9 (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Faiza Abidia
66.214.83.214 (talk) 02:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

HoH SiS
I was 100% unsatisfied with the JoJ, and I would like HoH SiS to do it all over again. — Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:51, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * There's no deleted article by the name "HoH SiS" but there's one deleted as WP:A3 called HoH SIS (uppercase I). And it consists of one line: "You know you want the joj. Call HoH SiS now". So . I don't see the point in restoring it. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It was an april fool's day joke based on a YouTube Poop. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah. That didn't occur to me. It isn't yet April 1 in my time zone. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

User_talk:121.54.32.0
I just recently found out about Wikipedia:Sandbox and I would like to continue my project over there. —203.87.129.163 (talk) 07:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * . Why don't you register an actual account first? The IP address you're posting from now is dynamic, and can be reassigned to someone else at any time. We're not going to keep shuffling a template article from one IP address to another. Create an account, then come back and ask again. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sajid_ishaq
He gave Me No Re son To Deleted the page here and then click the "Save page" button below —Nabeelpk007 (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It was deleted by our main policy WP:What Wikipedia is not which is used in every deletion. SwisterTwister   talk  18:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The reason given was quite clear. Two reasons actually: WP:A7 and WP:G11. As such, the article is ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You can ask the deleting administrator, and if that doesn't work, you can ask that the deletion decision be reviewed at Deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Hesham Watany
''I, Carbon011, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Carbon011 (talk) 13:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

It is a page for artist lives in Egypt, here it is the verified facebook fanpage https://www.facebook.com/HeshamWatany —Carbon011 (talk) 13:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The article was moved to Draft:Hesham Watany because it was deemed not yet ready for main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Co-operative Socialism
''I, John courtneidge, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' John courtneidge (talk) 13:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Teo Mora
I am Teo Mora, the person to which such entry is dedicated.

I hate to have my name quoted even in scientific papers even if this is partilly unavoidable.

In particolar I consider a negative representation of myself to see my name and my research activity connected not with my important results but with two results (FGLM and Grobner fan) of which I have a very negative opinion.

This probably is not relevant, but I assume to have the right to pretend oblivious in the form which is available

Simply: I DON?T WANT TO APPEAR INTO AN ENCYCLOPEDIA —130.251.60.15 (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Not only is this not the proper page (this page is for undeleting articles that have already been deleted) but we do not remove articles at the demand of an article subject, especially if the subject is legitimately notable under our standards and the threat is coming from an IP address that is potentially shared by dozens of users . You may attempt to go thru the Wikimedia Foundation office but I'm not certain they will acquiesce to your demands. —Jeremy <font color="228B22">v^_^v  Bori! 03:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The article is being discussed at Articles for deletion/Teo Mora. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:R King Crawford
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Marcus Of Oz (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)time period exceeded for editing due to unforeseen circumstances. Now wish to resume listing procedure.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Mandorla Art Award
Eternal-Optimism (talk) 07:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/Minority Genders
The editor who created the project subpage left in a huff after being asked not to insult other editors, link here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Women_in_Red. Other editors are trying to work on this project in good faith and should be permitted to do so. —<FONT COLOR="#000000">freshacconci</FONT><font color="#FF0000"> (✉) 20:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, page restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Togashi Masachika
''I, 3family6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 3family6  ( Talk to me  &#124;  See what I have done  ) 05:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I created this draft before I was aware that draftspace is not indefinite, and the draft was deleted before I had time to respond to the speedy deletion notice.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me  &#124;  See what I have done  ) 05:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. This wasn't an AfC submission, but I will try and work on this.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me  &#124;  See what I have done  ) 03:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:David Carlson (artist)
User:Tonya.howe. Howe 13:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Diffuse Capillary Malformation with Overgrowth (DCMO)
''I, Derm2014, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Derm2014 (talk) 00:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC) Didn't have time to finish edits previously, now want a chance to revamp article to make a final submission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derm2014 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Turntablist transcription methodology
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —68.194.62.249 (talk) 02:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC) The Turntablist Transcription Methodology is a notation for dj music that has been recognized by musicians around the world as well as various media outlets. It has been featured on the hit show CSI, BlackBook Magazine, XLR8R Magaizine, as well as the internationally distributed feature film called "Scratch" the movie directed by Doug Pray released in 2001. After having been feature in numerous publications, articles, websites and films over the years, it is tragic that Wikipedia admin "Courcelles" chose to delete the page for being "non-notable". The system was first released in a book format on February 17th 2000 in front of a audience at Symphony Space in New York City.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
 * since you endorsed the original prod, you may want to propose this at AFD if you are unconvinced by the comment above. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Three user pages


(I'm posting all three here in order not to spam the page - hope you're OK with that).

Hello. A few days ago I requested that my user pages be deleted. Coming to think of it, two (three) of them are actually useful additions to WP that could be finished within a few hours, 2 days max, and posted to readers' benefit. Plus, I wouldn't consider the time that I spent on writing them wasted. Sorry for the inconvenience.

If it's relevant, 'Dutch vowels' and 'Dutch recordings' are meant to massively improve Dutch phonology, which has sourcing problems (and then also Help:IPA for Dutch), whereas 'Differences from other accents' will improve the section on the pronunciation of Cardiff English.

There are also two other articles that were deleted, but there's no point in restoring them. Mr KEBAB (talk) 14:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, those three pages are restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parijat Chandra
''I, Jai0505, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jai0505 (talk) 13:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The page has been restored to Draft:Parijat Chandra.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Michieldewit/sandbox/New tab page
''I, Michieldewit, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Michieldewit (talk) 15:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Melanie Williamson
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Redwatermelon (talk) 17:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

I am not sure why this page was deleted. I have reached out to the person who deleted it, and I am waiting to hear back. I came to update content about the subject, on current events, with verified links, and the page was gone. Please help me restore this page, it was deleted by error or with-out full consideration. This is my formal request to restore the page.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
 * The article has many problems, as indicated by all the notices at the top. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Ikiebe
''I, 7ru57, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 7ru57 (talk) 10:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Lectonar (talk) 10:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rick G. Nelson
''I, Jessemansfield2014, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jessemansfield2014 (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This has already been restored twice, without you working on it. Lectonar (talk) 10:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Princeton - Blairstown Center
''I, Tbarnold, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Tbarnold (talk) 22:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Lapse in time —Tbarnold (talk) 22:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Lectonar (talk) 10:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Knowledge acquisition (philosophy)
Please restore it to Draft:Knowledge acquisition (philosophy). —Fixuture (talk) 21:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Please ask the deleting admin if that's OK. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Could you please restore it to draftspace? --Fixuture (talk) 18:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done. --Kurykh (talk) 04:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

User: Patient Zero
I'm back again. —Patient Zerotalk 09:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done Welcome back. Regards  So Why  09:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . :-) Patient Zerotalk 09:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Capital Novus
i am collecting and make proper content of this page so "Save page" button below —Abid2310 (talk) 03:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

''I, Abid2310, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Abid2310 (talk) 03:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * . The article was not deleted under CSD G13, it was deleted under CSD G11 and CSD G12 (unambiguous promotion and copyright infringement, respectively), and is therefore ineligible for restoration by request. Please start over in draft space, at Draft:Capital Novus, and submit the article for review via Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Gridware
It is for a company profile which is completely permissible and accurate content. The grounds for deletion were not sufficiently reasonable in the circumstances. —Gavinmcdowell (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia doesn't include articles that have content merely "permissible" and "accurate". Topics must meet notability criteria for inclusion. Not only did your article fail even to state why the company is significant, but it also include zero evidence of coverage in reliable independent sources of national scope as required by WP:CORP. So yes, the grounds for deletion were reasonable and justified. Therefore:
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I suggest you use Articles for creation to submit a draft for review, instead of attempting to write the article in main space where it would be quickly deleted. Also see Golden Rule to get a brief overview of what we expect in articles before they can be accepted in main space. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:17, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Bathymodiolus platifrons
This isn't strictly an undeletion request, I'd just like to know who created the original article which was deleted as G7. I've since recreated it (as I saw the article before it was deleted), but I'd like to know who the author was. Cheers. —Laurdecl talk 11:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have restored the contribution history so you can see for yourself. The original author requested that it be deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

User_talk:121.54.32.0 (2nd request)
Here's the account like you asked. Nobodycaneverherehimcall (talk) 00:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you get yourself unblocked, you may re-request userfication of that page to your sandbox. As long as you're blocked, though, there isn't much point in restoring it. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Open Access in Angola and Benin
the articles were properly quoted under cc by UNESCO — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filippo Morsiani (talk • contribs) 08:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Nothing was quoted with attribution, it was simply copied and pasted. Please point out where the Creative Commons license is stated on the UNESCO website. I don't see it on the pages that were copied, http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/access-by-region/africa/angola/ or http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/access-by-region/africa/benin/ . ~Anachronist (talk) 16:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)



Please refer to this page: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/ please just scroll down at the bottom, you will find the cc licensing for all the content in the GOAP portal, if this is not sufficeint then i'll need to edit every single page with cc licencing this will mean over 170 times... please let me know how to continue. ~Filippo Morsiani

Draft:Celiveo
No reasoning given. Testagaia (talk) 08:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)