Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 266

Touriosity Travelmag
''I, Paritoshnandi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Paritoshnandi (talk) 07:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry since it was resubmitted and rejected. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

User_talk:121.54.32.0 (3rd request)
How about a different account? Nobodycaneverherehimcall (talk) 18:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Nope. WP:Block evasion, which you are doing now, and would be doing with another account, isn't tolerated here. Get yourself unblocked first. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Todd_Schroeder
''I, Stevenlevine1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Stevenlevine1 (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Wishing Well Pictures
''I, Kent at wwp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Kent at wwp (talk) 15:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Better Left Said
''I, Kent at wwp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Kent at wwp (talk) 15:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Clifford Henry Fitzherbert Plowman
Heraldic (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Thomas London
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Wikibussster (talk) 18:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC) The Author Page for Thomas London was deleted because only one source cited him. I have collected over 25 different news media mentions, as well as an IMDB page and would like the page reinstated to build it back out. Thank you.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
 * And also nominated for speedy deletion since the subject is definitely not notable, and appears to have produced only self-published works sold on Amazon. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Division by zero
This page should be restored as it was it was tagged with but was still deleted as a hoax. —-KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I've restored it as a harmless non-mainspace page. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Remove kebab
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —49.151.166.122 (talk) 13:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * There was no content, it was just a redirect to Srebrenica massacre but I restored it anyway. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Austrian Aviation Museum
''I, Gert Haussner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gert Haussner (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Insurify
I would appreciate having a copy of the draft for my personal records. Looks like the page was deleted under G13. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Todkiry (talk • contribs) 21:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
 * You have another six months to improve it and resubmit for review, if you like. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Thad Roberts
Thad Roberts Quantum Space Theory is just about to become accepted in the established physics community. His TEDxTalk has almost 1 Mio. views and the deletion of his Wikipedia entry has been premature, most probably by somebody jealous or with negative intent —Soaring (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * No, not at all, it was deleted by clear community consensus by our set policies, and so it was closed as delete. It would especially if you show us what substance you'll use for a new article, so we can gauge the chances. "1 million views" is not quite what convinces us. SwisterTwister   talk  17:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * SwisterTwister is correct. X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Thad Roberts, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, if you contact me, please do not start off with unsupported accusations of bad faith towards other editors, thanks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Scepter Publishers
Would like historical content to rewrite in adherence to Wikipedia standards using Wizard & 3rd party editor in collaborative manner. Thank you. LesTP 20:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
 * I suggest you ask the deleting administrator if he or she would be willing to restore it to draft space for improvement. If it were restored to main space, it would be quickly deleted again, because there is no credible assertion of significance made in the article, and no coverage by independent reliable sources as required by WP:CORP. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@Anachronist Thank you. I have done as you suggested. Thank you. LesTP 21:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LesTP (talk • contribs)

Shadab Siddiqui
he is directed 6 short films and now he is going to direct movie so please do not delete this page —Theimagemotion (talk) 22:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * did you even read the message in the big blue box at the top of this page? The article isn't deleted, and this page isn't for contesting a pending deletion. Go to Articles for deletion/Shadab Siddiqui for that. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Insonic
I am learning how to use this system. I just would like to create an entry for my work as musical producer. My website is at http://www.insonicmusic.com and I already released 2 albuns, that is at many stores and spotify too. I stoped writing to assist my childs for 30 minutes, and when I came back the article was removed. Where can I start please ? Some links about me: —Mcezzare (talk) 03:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC) Mcezzare


 * Because you have a conflict of interest about yourself (see WP:COI for guidance) you should not be writing an article about yourself in main space. You should use your sandbox or draft space, and submit your article for review by someone who doesn't have a conflict, before it can be accepted in to main article space.
 * A glaring problem is that those links aren't "about" you, they are created by you. We need significant coverage from reliable sources that are independent of you. See Golden Rule for more information.
 * In the meantime, I have moved your article to Draft:Insonic for you to work on it further. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, in addition to the requirement for significant coverage by independent reliable sources, we have additional criteria for inclusion at WP:MUSICBIO. If you don't meet any of them, then we cannot publish an article about you or your work. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Blaine Graboyes
''I, AhNjom, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' AhNjom (talk) 00:58, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Olga Prokopova
I ask you to revise the deletion of the page Olga Prokopova. I read about copyright infringement, and I can assert that the article I created is original and does not violate copyrights. I wrote to the administrator who deleted the page Olga Prokopova, he did not answer me —Marino Asler (talk) 12:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * , because the article exists. Since you have re-created the article, I decline to restore the deleted revisions that were problematic. The article still appears to have some sentences or phrases copied from http://www.volhajewelry.com/info/ although I agree it's minimal. I am not convinced, however, that the topic merits an article here, so I have nominated it for deletion at Articles for deletion/Olga Prokopova.
 * Of greater concern is your association with Olga Prokopova, given that your first two attempts at creating this article suggest that you have a conflict of interest. Be aware that you are required to disclose your association; this is mandatory, not negotiable, and you entered in a legal obligation to do so when you created an account here. See WP:PAID for details of disclosure. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Waleed Hassan
''I, Wwhoami, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Wwhoami (talk) 15:04, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Jim gee and the revolution
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jimbogeer (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2017 (UTC) punk band uk swindon Wiltshire to be listed
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
 * Also, since you seem to have an association with the topic, you should really be working on this in your sandbox or in draft space, not main article space. See Golden Rule and also WP:BAND to get an idea of what's required before the band merits an article on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Daphne Lantier/sandbox
This had a list of books I'm planning on reading, some of which need articles. I was concerned that I wouldn't be able to find good sources for these, but I think I'd still like to try after more consideration. Thanks. —Daphne Lantier  22:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, sandbox restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Daphne Lantier/Reading List 2017–2018
As per the above request for my sandbox being restored, which was done by. I just figured out that it was in fact this page I needed restored. The sandbox is useful too so I'd like to keep that. —Daphne Lantier  00:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, page restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi
Reliable sources has been added for confirmation —47.247.1.28 (talk) 06:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * So? Did you read the blue box at the top of this page? ~Anachronist (talk) 06:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

martin stoltz
I would like the chance to put the proper reference into my page but can't seem to bring up the original source page. My background is one of the most experienced cinematic directors in the video game industry having work viewed by millions of people and several articles and presentations around the world about the industry. —Pteor (talk) 21:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Martin Stoltz, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Also, your conflict of interest is rather obvious; deletion review is thataway. Lectonar (talk) 21:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Fcia0423/draft article on Confucius Statue
''I, Fcia0423, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Frances Di Lauro 11:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Draft article on Peter Nicol Russell memorial
''I, Fcia0423, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Frances Di Lauro 11:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

SARP Honorary Award
I originally prodded it 2 years back. Now I have seconds thought and I think this may be a notable award. Awarding of this award has been often covered by the main Polish daily:. This IMHO makes it notable. —Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Vuevent
 [No explanation provided.]  Jderocher (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This was already restored twice before, and the last time you didn't really do anything with it. This will be the third and last time.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —CXPowell (talk) 17:53, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

I request restoration of this page. It was NOT primarily restoration of material deleted from the Bill Murphy page. To the contrary, it was all original material.
 * , nothing to do, the page isn't deleted, it's just a redirect. The history of the redirect is fully intact. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Prompt Softech
This page is not contain any promotional material and It is display only about the company stands for good work in particular fields. —Wmasterus (talk) 06:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 

Draft:Stan Greene
''I, Stan Greene, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Stan Greene (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles Conger Ervin
''I, Cececre, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ce Ce CRE (talk) 19:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Currency UK Ltd
''I, Maytran007, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Maytran007 (talk) 22:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Keene Seventh-Day-Adventist Church
Fjdkgh321 (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This is a copyright violation, as it used material taken from this link. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Pronto Woven
''I, Raycd21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Raycd21 (talk) 02:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Pompea Smith
Lily Prigioniero (talk) 07:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Pompea Smith
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sri Muneshwara Swamy Temple
''I, Somshkr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Somshkr (talk) 12:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Previously it was deleted since there was no article in the news or media. Please find the new article about that temple here: http://www.deccanchronicle.com/150524/nation-current-affairs/article/bengaluru-animal-sacrifice-kills-peace-defence-colony OR http://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/sri-muneshwaraswamy-temple-sheep-chicken-goats/articleshow/47391002.cms? —Somshkr (talk) 12:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Keith St John/sandbox
''I, Keith St John, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Keith St John (talk) 22:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:49, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mars City Design
''I, Brahms1975, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Brahms1975 (talk) 00:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:John Freddy Narvaez
I created the page and I was attempting to get the organizer of the 'World Latin Dance Cup' to make competition results of earlier years available so they can be referenced for this article. I have found some information that has become available that I can use to update some of the references. I still wish to pursue editing the article and submit for review by Wikipedia "Save page" button below —Rgnod (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Chittoor V. Ramamoorthy
''I, Rgnod, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rgnod (talk) 07:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KSL.com
''I, Lee Choquette, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lee Choquette (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

The Atlantic recently published a story about KSL.com (https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/04/ksl-craigslist-classifieds/521916/) which I would of course make one of the main references in this draft article. I am not affiliated with KSL, but have long been curious about how it's much better known than Craiglist in this region. Lee Choquette (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

List of Stanley Cup Finals broadcasters
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —BornonJune8 (talk) 06:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

It isn't fair that the National Hockey League's premiere championship event doesn't have its own individual article for its broadcasters while other sports do. That article took a really long time to set up and put together to just let it go by the waste-side. And just because they aren't fully sourced on the proper article itself, doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't non the less, more thoroughly sourced on the respective articles for said television networks. BornonJune8 (talk), 23:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user, or who deleted it most recently in accordance with WP:G4. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ryan McKibben
''I, Rmckibben, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rmckibben (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Timothy M. Herbst
''I, Eaglewbc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Eaglewbc (talk) 00:19, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Green Star Media Ltd
''I, Rugbyboy2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rugbyboy2 (talk) 12:44, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Tokyogirl79. Yes please there may be something that can be used from that earlier draft Rugbyboy2 (talk) 15:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC) Many thanks Rugbyboy2 (talk) 15:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like the article was accepted and moved to Green Star Media. Are you looking for the article history prior to that? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done, I've restored the history, which you can find here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have merged the histories of the draft and main space articles so that everything is now in one place. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Anachronist Thank you Rugbyboy2 (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Run in Red
A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events) Shortcut: WP:A7 Further information: Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance This applies to any article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event[8] that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions.[9] This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums (these may be covered by CSD A9), software, or other creative works. This criterion does not apply to species of animals, only to individual animal(s). The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion. —KillickK (talk) 16:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

The person who deleted this page was using the standard of '''notability ''' which is NOT the policy of wikipedia. Where an article is credible in supporting the significance then the page MUST remain. When an artist is published by BMI, distributed by itunes, Spotify and Deezer... they have then become significant. I demand that you reverse this decision to delete the page of Run in Red.
 * . No such claims of significance were made in the article, therefore a A7 deletion was appropriate. Take it up with the deleting administrator, . ~Anachronist (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Balkrishna
Suddenly the page has been deleted. Whenever I used to get time, I used to add things to this page. He is among one of the richest billionaires in India. How can someone directly delete the page without a reason. Please restore it.Didgeri (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC) —Didgeri (talk) 12:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * since it was deleted as WP:G11, but waiting for a response from User:JzG. If JzG won't restore it, you may have to take this to Deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a bit rum:
 * I suspect off-wiki collaboration. Guy (Help!) 22:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * What does "off-wiki collaboration" have to do with a unilateral WP:G11 deletion? I asked you for your rationale at User talk:JzG/Archive 146 and you gave a dismissive reply. The article you deleted had zero resemblance to the version that was deleted by Bbb23 in 2014. Is it such a big deal to slap an AFD nomination tag on it instead? ~Anachronist (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam! Guy (Help!) 19:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Another non-answer? What was being spammed? It was a fully fleshed-out article with many references to reliable sources. Why did you feel it necessary to take unilateral action to delete the entire article without review, versus any number of other things that could have been done, such as removing the spam links, going to AFD, blacklisting some links, and so on? And if the article were restored, what specifically would be your objection? Nobody here can read your mind, so please enlighten us about your reasoning. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I suspect off-wiki collaboration. Guy (Help!) 22:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * What does "off-wiki collaboration" have to do with a unilateral WP:G11 deletion? I asked you for your rationale at User talk:JzG/Archive 146 and you gave a dismissive reply. The article you deleted had zero resemblance to the version that was deleted by Bbb23 in 2014. Is it such a big deal to slap an AFD nomination tag on it instead? ~Anachronist (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam! Guy (Help!) 19:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Another non-answer? What was being spammed? It was a fully fleshed-out article with many references to reliable sources. Why did you feel it necessary to take unilateral action to delete the entire article without review, versus any number of other things that could have been done, such as removing the spam links, going to AFD, blacklisting some links, and so on? And if the article were restored, what specifically would be your objection? Nobody here can read your mind, so please enlighten us about your reasoning. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * What does "off-wiki collaboration" have to do with a unilateral WP:G11 deletion? I asked you for your rationale at User talk:JzG/Archive 146 and you gave a dismissive reply. The article you deleted had zero resemblance to the version that was deleted by Bbb23 in 2014. Is it such a big deal to slap an AFD nomination tag on it instead? ~Anachronist (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Lovely Spam! Wonderful Spam! Guy (Help!) 19:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Another non-answer? What was being spammed? It was a fully fleshed-out article with many references to reliable sources. Why did you feel it necessary to take unilateral action to delete the entire article without review, versus any number of other things that could have been done, such as removing the spam links, going to AFD, blacklisting some links, and so on? And if the article were restored, what specifically would be your objection? Nobody here can read your mind, so please enlighten us about your reasoning. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Thailand national under-14 football team
This page is true information. Information from AFC and FA Thailand website. —BTechTV (talk) 14:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * but this version is substantially the same in content (the new one actually has less sources) than the one deleted previously at Articles for deletion/Thailand national under-14 football team. Also, read the message at the top of this page. This page isn't for contesting pending deletions, or deletion outcomes. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Whirlpool (song)
Please restore this page (contesting the PROD so that the edit history may be restored), then afterwards, replace the page's entire content with the following text:"" (I'm not contesting the subject's notability, just wanting the edit history restored since this can become a redirect.) Thanks! — Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Johnny Symons
''I, Dchein, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dchein (talk) 22:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This contained WP:COPYVIO from his official bio, (a fairly good chunk of the article is his official bio) so we can't restore it. I'll send you a copy of the article if you like - you can't repost it "as is" because of the copyvio, but it could be helpful as far as general information goes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sent, Dchein, check your email. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

zana tetrazini
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Shawndadoe (talk) 03:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC) the idea is made by myself and myself only. there is nothing else like it in the web.
 * X mark.svg Not done Don't take this personally, but Wikipedia isn't a place to host recipes, nor things that you came up with WP:ONEDAY. I would instead recommend that you look into adding it to one of the recipe hosting sites like Allrecipes.com instead. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:James Manning (1917-1989)
''I, Joslad1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Joslad1 (talk) 01:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:James Manning (1917-1989)
''I, 2407:7000:8767:5770:BC47:DA97:7F45:2CD6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2407:7000:8767:5770:BC47:DA97:7F45:2CD6 (talk) 02:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Helga Moray
Hreynecke (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Neal Collins (politician)
This was PROD'd because the individual in question was just a candidate for office. But now they have been elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives, and are therefore inherently notable per WP:NPOL. —LtNOWIS (talk) 02:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Spit_like_this
Deleted claiming the band to be local, despite having several internationally distributed releases through recognised channels, signed to Sony/ATV, performed internationally and so on. Any quick Google can verify all these facts https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22spit+like+this%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab&gfe_rd=cr&ei=myLyWLSzA8bHXp-ggSA —84.51.134.119 (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Spit Like This, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Double the Vivek Singh Chaudhary
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Double the Vivek Singh Chaudhary 13:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself, as it isn't a social media site. If you pass notability guidelines then it's likely that someone will eventually write about you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  19:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

sujok therapy
the containing information is very valuable and useful for the society at large. Sujok therapy is such a natural method of treatment accepted global and I believe that this article can stand here and improve —Smile Dhaval (talk) 06:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 22:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Oswaldo Oropeza, el compositor de Latinoamerica
''I, Caribana10, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Caribana10 (talk) 02:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

I would like to request the undeletion of the page I am writing to my father. I started my own company 2 1/2 years ago and it is only now that it is starting to work and I have time now to finish my father's page, which I will complete with pictures and then publish for approval. Please help me in retrieving my father's Wikipeida page agEnter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Caribana10 (talk) 02:27, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? This page has been deleted as an abandoned draft three or four times. Most drafts only get undeleted once, maybe twice. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 22:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

宗 also known as.
thank you @wikipedia 🌿 editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyroyal (talk • contribs) 01:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 03:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Karthik ganiga/sandbox
This is the wikipage going to be created for the Alva's Institution of Engineering and Technology and i am fully authorized by the organisation to create the wikipedia page and use content from the organisation website.Please allow me to continue to create wiki page on the same.Thank You —Karthik ganiga (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * That isn't how it works at all. See WP:Donating copyrighted materials for information on donating copyrighted text. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 04:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Espoona
I see no reason why a fun, made up team can be deleted. I put my heart and soul into it! —93.191.207.78 (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Wikipedia is not a place to post content that you came up with one day. I'm giving the account that made the page a NOTHERE block until they can show that they are willing to edit within policy, given that they kept recreating the page even after a pretty clear warning that it wasn't acceptable. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Lucas Bambozzi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Diphusa (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC) A translated page about Lucas Bambozzi was speedy deleted without the opportunity for reviewing the mistakes or attributions requested. As explained to the contributor, Diannaa the article is about an artist/person who is notable in his working field, so the words for describing his actuation are surely in close relation to his biographic details, both in English and Portuguese. A proper attribution, quotation of sources and history of links will be fully provided in the reviewed article. Many thanks, --Diphusa (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Diphusa (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * , the page for Lucas Bambozzi is not in English. All pages on the English language Wikipedia must be in English or it will run the risk of getting deleted. Prior to that you had also added content from this website, making it a copyright violation. This is why deleted some of the prior verisons of the page. If you want the page retained, you need to translate it into English. However even then you need to be careful to make sure that he passes WP:NBIO guidelines on Wikipedia - just because his page exists on another language's Wikipedia does not mean that he passes notability guidelines on here. An individual is not automatically notable for existing and putting out work in their field. You have to show notability by providing independent reliable sources that establish how Bambozzi is notable. Primary sources (ie, things released by Bambozzi or people/organizations affiliated with him) cannot show notability. I'm also concerned that the name of the article is Lucas Bambozzi, yet the article itself talks about someone named Lucas de Silveira. If he operates under a professional name, then this needs to be noted and sourced in the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marcus Gosse
''I, Lismatthews, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lismatthews (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)