Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 271

Draft:Hellenic Electronic Center
''I, Thanos7v, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Thanos7v (talk) 14:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:J. Geoffrey Stevenson
''I, JGeoffreyStevenson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Geoff Stevenson (talk) 09:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:10, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Medieval Engineers
The deletion says the game is not notable and has no reliable sources. It has sold over 250,000 copies and has multiple articles on major gaming news sites like PC Gamer and Rock, Paper, Shotgun. —CptTwinkie (talk) 15:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC) : Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  21:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this page is a copyright violation.  Hut 8.5  21:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

I will be happy to remove any copyright violations from the page. I can't do anything while it is deleted though. --CptTwinkie (talk) 11:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * if you removed all the copyright violations from the page there would be literally nothing left. I suggest you start from scratch. No doubt you can do better than copying some promotional blurb from the official website.  Hut 8.5  19:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Cité-jardin du Tricententaire de Montréal
''I, Cveltman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Cveltman (talk) 16:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will need to translate this into English if you want it to be accepted on the English Wikipedia though. Otherwise try the French Wikipedia.  Hut 8.5  20:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Andretta (music))
''I, Sherifandretta, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Sherifandretta (talk) 13:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  20:56, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

XLispStat
Expired PROD, reason given was lack of references, but I have found numerous references in Google Books: This software has been widely used in statistics, hence there are many references to it in published literature. It is far less popular than it used to be, since it dates to the late 1980s/early 1990s and probably saw its greatest popularity in the early-to-mid 1990s with greatly declining usage since. There is a paper explaining why UCLA's Department of Statistics abandoned it in 1998, and their reasons probably hold true for many other of its former users. Anyway, I think this is clearly notable as a formerly widely used piece of freely available statistical software which is the subject of mutliple published works, forms an important part of the history of statistical software, and should be restored on that basis. —SJK (talk) 07:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Detailed summary of this package in a guide to statistical tools for astronomers.
 * Assertion that this package was historically influential in the field of statistical visualization.
 * The author of the package wrote a book about it, published in 1990–while that is not strictly speaker an independent source (unlike the other sources I cite), it was published by a respected publisher (John Wiley & Sons)
 * This reference discusses its use in GIS.
 * Used in speech acoustics research
 * Book on econometrics which extensively discusses use of xlispstat to perform econometrical calculations
 * Describes statistical software known as "CoCo" for contingency tables which extends xlispstat
 * Book on regression analysis which includes a regression analysis software package written in xlispstat
 * Also has seen use in epidemiology


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  20:59, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of state highways in Polk County, Texas
Requested by —JMHamo (talk) 20:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Manel (term)
The page describes a pervasive and well documented phenomenon which is observed across many disciplines. —BionicWoman (talk) 10:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.~ GB fan 10:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Young Stunna
Artist is living and has meet all necessary criteria and needs article on Wikipedia to confirm Twitter Verification. I would appreciate it if it is sent back as a draft or to my email to allow further clarification on the article if the said article can not be restored. Thanks —Rexchuqa (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * @Rexchuqa: X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Young Stunna, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--
 * P.S This also appears to have been a blatant copyright violation of this (so it cannot be emailed).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

talk the article in question is young Stunna (musician) not just young Stunna. Oh well thanks for your reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexchuqa (talk • contribs) 07:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The title is irrelevant. The topic was discussed at AfD, though in this case the title was moved, so the restoration I considered was the deleted version.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Rehmat Aziz GoldMedalist
for god sake do not believe this page i am very famous person you can search on internet —Rachitrali0 (talk) 05:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This is probably User:Akbaralighazi, a sockmaster. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * More likely to be User:Najaf ali bhayo, another sockmaster. – Uanfala (talk) 09:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Lectonar (talk) 13:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Emil Audero
Conorod18 (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mr. Tim Swain
''I, Essenbrown, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Essenbrown (talk) 18:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

11:18, 20 June 2016 JohnCD (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Mr. Tim Swain (G13: Abandoned Article for creation – to retrieve it, see WP:REFUND/G13: promotional - verging on G11)
 * X mark.svg Not done this page is a copyright violation of various sources including and . The page was also very promotional and "verging on G11" is a little generous.  Hut 8.5  20:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Maurice Claypole
''I, Celia612, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Celia612 (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)


 * this page has been restored twice before as a result of G13 deletions, at least one of which was at your request. Draft space is intended for people to work on content with a view to turning it into a viable mainspace page rather than for indefinite storage of content. Can you give any details of improvements you intend to make to this page?  Hut 8.5  21:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Virus Total Screenshot.jpg
Hi, Technically not undeletion but I was wondering if an admin could restore my "09:07, 23 January 2017" revision - I planned to reupload however now I don't have a 1366x768 laptop my new version would probably look odd on bigger screens, Also I'll add this time, Thanks, —– Davey 2010 Talk 17:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * What is wrong with the current version as it stands? The one you're requesting is too high-resolution for 'fair use' on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Because nothing in the image can be seen, There is no image limit when it comes to fair use - It should be minimal/small however it should be readable too which at present this image isn't, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 19:10, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn - Nevermind I'll just reupload seeing as it's too much hard work restoring one simple revision!, Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Militant Mothers of Raymur
''I, Mooack, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mooack (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  20:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually it was a well sourced well written complete article. Someone forgot to send to mainspace before but I've promoted it. Good job. Legacypac (talk) 06:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:David Bernon
''I, Venetjaa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Venetjaa (talk) 04:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this page is a copyright violation.  Hut 8.5  06:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mark Stanley (guitarist)
''I, Walrus Boot, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Walrus Boot (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Depth of Knowledge
''I, Jwalkupcash, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jwalkupcash (talk) 20:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Goutam Kumar Jain
He is a notable Bollywood director and is also a co-founder & executive direvtor of M Tech informatics pvt. Ltd —Nitin819 (talk) 11:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Your activities suggest you may perhaps have a financial or business connection here, and if so you are required to see policies WP:What Wikipedia is not and WP:Paid as they're legally non-negotiable. SwisterTwister   talk  22:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I would have speedy-deleted it as G11 if it had been proposed. I'm uncomfortable restoring this rather blatant promotional piece to main article space, even if it was deleted by a prod.
 * I am willing to restore this to draft space for you to work on and improve, but when you are done you must submit it for review via Articles for creation. Additionally, see WP:PAID and disclose your paid editing affiliation. As SwisterTwister said, this is not negotiable. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Bonin Bough
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —173.68.61.173 (talk) 18:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Can someone explain to me why Bonin Bough's page was deleted? And what needs to be done to get it back up online?

Thank you,

Sofia


 * Bonin Bough was deleted to move it to Draft:Bonin Bough which was deleted as "Draft:Bonin Bough (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND)" You are asking in the right place but I'm not an Admin and you need one to undelete. Legacypac (talk) 21:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your investigation; it saved me some time.
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Jay Towers
I work with Jay at his radio and tv station as his assistant. This page was created to have a bio on him and link from his radio station and television station pages where he is already listed as an employee. This is not a promotion of him, rather a link to his bio since his name is already mentioned in many articles. —Jonklaft (talk) 18:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. It was also at least partly a copyright violation, which would itself be enough to decline this request. I suggest you read our rules regarding conflicts of interest before attempting to make edits about your colleagues.  Hut 8.5  19:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

File:KidzBop16.jpg
Deleted as "Unused non-free media". Page that was using the image was improperly turned into a redirect, but has been restored. —Kaldari (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done  Hut 8.5  19:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:HGR Industrial Surplus
''I, Gtabasso, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gtabasso (talk) 17:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  20:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mark Stanley (guitarist)
''I, Walrus Boot, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Walrus Boot (talk) 04:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ in response to the identical request above.  Hut 8.5  20:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Eurocharm Holdings
''I, Irisyatingyu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Irisyatingyu (talk) 04:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  20:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Chetu
The original page was created to provide information on what Chetu is, our history, and our progress. It is not intended to be an advertisement but instead to be informational. —50.192.171.26 (talk) 15:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The page and its intended purpose was informational, detailing the company history, accomplishments, all of which are verifiable on multiple sources. —50.192.171.26 (talk) 15:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Page deleted with the concern "Pure advertisement, sourced to press releases, directories, and the company site.)". Wikipedia is not an appropriate place to promote your business. It may be ok for a page about your business to exist if it passes WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:N which requires significant coverage of the business in independant sources. If your business is "Notable" in Wikipedia terms some unrelated editor will wrote about it. Legacypac (talk) 01:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Eng. Yasir I. Kashgari
Hi ...

It is nice to be in touch with you ... I would like to undeleat my page ... and for, future refrence ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ykashgari (talk • contribs) 13:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC) and this page could be my biography ... and this page could be category at biography, author, books, innovation, creative, culture, ...   and Merci ... It is nice to receive your next email soon ...

Thankfully ... _______________________________________ Eng. Yasir I. Kashgari

Mobile: Jeddah Saudi Arabia and then click the "Save page" button below — Yasir I. Kashgari 13:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Hi . I assume this is about your userpage, User:Ykashgari which was deleted under CSD U5—for pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. This page was properly deleted. Wikipedia is not a forum for self-promotion. It is not a place like LinkedIn, Facebook or other social media sites, but is an encyclopedia. Your userpage may contain some limited material about yourself, but its purpose is chiefly for describing Wikipedia related matters. See What may I not have in my user pages? As to having an article on you (i.e., an encyclopedia article in the article mainspace), after looking at your deleted userpage, I do not believe that is possible. I believe you (just like me and the vast majority of people on the Earth), are not notable, as we use that word here to mean the subject of substantive discussion in reliable, secondary and independent sources. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:East Wall Fire
''I, Stardomax, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Stardomax (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. From its first edit, the draft was a blatant copyright violation and was plagiarism of this site .--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Chris Swanson
''I, Berndtjb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Berndtjb (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. This page was a blatant copyright violation and was plagiarism of his iMDb bio. Don't do that again.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Suzanne LaFleur
''I, Cmemart26, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Cmemart26 (talk) 01:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @Cmemart26: Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * See my edits on your talk page regarding copyright. In short, the draft I have restored is the later one, created by on August 30, 2016‎, and not the one you created on September 17, 2014. That earlier one by you contained blatant, copy-and-paste, copyright violations and plagiarism of the artist's biography at her website. It might or might not have contained copyrighted content from elsewhere; I have not looked since its academic as deleted and not restored. But, you must not do that again and you need to be aware that if you do, now that you've been told about this, not only will those edits be removed, but that will subject you to a block from further editing. Thank you for understanding.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Baile24
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Baile24 (talk) 22:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done No page name specified, no reason given. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 23:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Volta (Cirque du Soleil)
User:Justlettersandnumbers continually deletes this page for no reason whatsoever. He/She request citations of information that is not cited on any other similar page and is destructive rather than constructive with their edits. —Tom1819 (talk) 12:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. This page is not deleted it is redirected. Deletion is a technical term, meaning the page, with its page history has been removed, in a manner that only adminstrators and other with higher permissions can undo. The redirection of a page is not a deletion. Anyway, your comments above show you have not read and understood Wikipedia's core requirements for good edits, e.g., that verifiability of our content, through citations to reliable sources, is the lifeblood of good Wikipedia edits and content. The logic underlying your comment falls under WP:WAX – yes, bad edits abound; yes, there are lots of poor articles that need editing to bring them into line or need to be deleted. That is not a validation for making more bad edits or creating deletion fodder. In sum, I agree with ' redirection, and hope you will to try to learn why.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , I've made that page into redirect twice. The first time was because of copyright violations, the second time because the content you added was without any references at all. The two are not connected. And yes, I do constantly request citations for information. If you find unsourced information in other pages you can do the same, or simply remove the material. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Samira Khan Mahi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Shariqlucknow (talk) 04:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC) reference to your deletion of Samira Khan Mahi page, please check the "list of bangladeshi actors" in wikipedia. 90% pages references is same newspaper papers which is used in samira mahi page.no nobel work show in 90% pages and some pages is given only one reference but still these pages is in wikipedia since many years. They are worked less then Samira Khan Mahi but they still in wikipedia.

She is notable person in Bangladesh. All references given from leading newspapers of country.
 * X mark.svg Not done. This page is not deleted but at AfD. If you want to comment, then go to Articles for deletion/Samira Khan Mahi. Note that if does get deleted as a result of discussion there, a request here will not work (see the top of this page for what's within and what's without its ambit)--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Estimation of the anterior chamber of the adult human eye using EZ Ratio
''I, Melbourneeyeresearch, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Melbourneeyeresearch (talk) 02:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @Melbourneeyeresearch: Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:S. Fitzgerald Haney
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Solyesh1 (talk) 23:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

I would like to continue editing the page to address the issues raised (citekill).

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solyesh1 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @Solyesh1: Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Jeff Ansell
We noticed that Juliancolton deleted the Jeff Ansell page. Janny64 is another user, so that reason is speculation and not fact. Here’s an additional source that has been published for further background on Jeff Ansell: Rock 'n' Radio: When Djs And Rock Music Ruled The Airwaves https://www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/rock-n-radio-when-djs/9781550654691-item.html —Jaa.office (talk) 15:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Jeff Ansell, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't understand the reasoning in your message above. The page was deleted because there was little evidence of substantive coverage in the reliable, secondary and independent sources that are needed to demonstrate notability—not because of who edited it. The nomination by (not the deletion basis by ), mentioned as a seeming side note, that the user name of the user who created it gave an implication of there being a conflict of interest, but that was not the basis for the deletion, or certainly not its crux. Meanwhile, the link you place above adds nothing whatever to address the actual bases. This link is to a bookseller's site, with the blurb being a quotation from the book itself. It adds nothing to evidence notability. Meanwhile, the content of the deleted page was essentially a promotional résumé belonging on LinkedIn maybe, but not Wikipedia. Promotional pages like this are always added by insiders; there is no reason why any independent person, here with a proper aim to expand the encyclopedia on a topic of knowledge, would ever decide on a topic like this and attempt to write an article.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Indeed, just to clarify, the possible conflict of interest that the username Janny64 might have represented was not the crux of the reasons why the article was listed for deletion — it was merely mentioned as an aside, while the core of the deletion argument was the fact that the article was not citing any reliable source coverage to demonstrate that Ansell passed any of our notability criteria. A writer does not get an automatic inclusion freebie on Wikipedia just because his book or books exist — the way to demonstrate that he passes WP:AUTHOR for writing books is to show that real media (the kind with actual editorial standards, such as newspapers and magazines and literary journals) have published content about him and/or his writing (e.g. book reviews). Simply showing that his book has a profile on Amazon or Goodreads is not evidence of notability in and of itself, because every book that exists at all has a profile on one or both of those sites. Bearcat (talk) 14:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Request for Undeletion: Eric Leach
Wiki page active for five years and is now gone. Request to undelete page —Thetruthtoo (talk) 01:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page was redirected, not deleted; all prior edits remain in the revision history. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 02:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Jeremy, can you help me understand the error "an automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive? I'm updating it accurately. Thank you for your help.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetruthtoo (talk • contribs) 05:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi . You are being caught by an edit filter. It's not a human but an automated program (in other words a dumb bot). They actually are pretty good at identifying and keeping out vandalism. In this case though it's a false-positive to your detriment. It has something to do with the edit you're trying to add having curses in it and in all caps, Like "FUCKED, LET'S ROCK COMPILATION". The first thing you should try is not using all caps – which is wrong anyway, the album title's should not be in all caps, and should be italicized btw – place doubled apostrophes around the titles). If that doesn't work, try leaving out the one with curses, and then added it in later, in a single edit. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! (talk) Thetruthtoo (talk) 15:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

User:SageGreenRider/Navitas
Why the rush to delete? —Talk to SageGreenRider 02:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * pretty sure I tagged it. It was a blank page containing only article wizard text. There is noting to restore. It was also very old. Legacypac (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the only content was the default wizard text and an experiment in formatting a reference. I'll restore it if you like but there isn't really anything there.  Hut 8.5  06:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . Yes, please restore it. It was a placeholder for a project I'm working on that took longer to mature than I anticipated. Talk to SageGreenRider 16:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done  Hut 8.5  18:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Suß
This page, and Sueß also, were just created at WP:AFC/R. However, they were deleted by AnomieBOT III (so of course I have not talked with the deleting administrator), and it looks like the creator just messed up and redirected them to a nonexistent place. Could you undelete them and point them to Süß? 208.95.51.38 (talk) 12:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC) —208.95.51.38 (talk) 12:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ and fixed, had two pieces of info switched.  ~ GB fan
 * Thank you, . Could you also do Sueß?  208.95.51.38 (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ also, same problem. ~ GB fan 12:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Bonin Bough
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Sofiapoyhonen (talk) 19:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

I worked with a freelancer to create a Wikipedia page for Bonin Bough. The Wikipedia page was already up until user Fastily deleted it. User Smartse then restored it to draft mode. (See below).

I've reached out to both administrators to find out why they felt the page needed to be deleted. Bonin is one of the most well-known marketing executives in the world and just had a TV show on CNBC with LeBron James about revitalizing neighborhoods in Cleveland and they are planning to do a second season.

Would appreciate any help with letting me know why the page was deleted.

Thank you,

Sofia


 * 09:32, 18 May 2017 Smartse (talk | contribs) restored page Bonin Bough (35 revisions) (restoring to move to draft)
 * 05:53, 18 May 2017 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted page Bonin Bough (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND)
 * 20:51, 14 April 2017 MelanieN (talk | contribs) deleted page Bonin Bough (G6: Deleted to make room for an uncontroversial page move)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Bonin+Bough&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&subtype=


 * You haven't asked either myself or User:Fastily about this. The reason it was deleted was because the freelancer you were working with (User:Janweh64) requested that it be deleted, first at Bonin Bough and then again at Draft:Bonin Bough . The draft has already been undeleted per the request further up the page that was made 3 days ago. Please see the comments that other users have made at Draft:Bonin Bough regarding why they don't think the article is suitable for inclusion. SmartSE (talk) 20:15, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Lal Fonseka
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —43.250.241.50 (talk) 02:58, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Lal Fonseka, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Parviz Iskenderov
A new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page (undeleting the page with the following addition of new information). —Parviziskender (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Someone has already placed a request on the talk page of BigDom. It is though also appears in a speedy deletion done on 2 September 2008 by Maxim? OK, no problem. Thank you.
 * X mark.svg Not done this page was deleted as the result of an AfD discussion (Articles for deletion/Parviz Iskenderov) so it isn't eligible for restoration though this process. You can contact the admin who closed the discussion (User:BigDom) or go to Deletion review. There is nothing preventing you from writing a new article at this title as long as it addresses the reasons that led to the other one being deleted.  Hut 8.5  20:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The prior speedy deletion was as a copyright violation, we're not going to restore that because you think something has changed. If the deleting admin doesn't respond or declines you'll need to go to deletion review. Rewriting it is likely a better option, if things have really changed then you'd have to make plenty of changes anyway.  Hut 8.5  18:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Vectone Mobile
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Tankst (talk) 08:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Nyttend (talk) 02:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Drew270/sandbox
(no text provided) Drew270 (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  20:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Iraq Boy Scouts and Girl Guides Council 1980s.png
this older emblem has recently been readopted —Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Kintetsubuffalo, can you cite something? The links in Iraq Boy Scouts and Girl Guides Council are all years old (one of the ones in the ELs is now just the words "Account Suspended" on a pretty background), and I'm not finding anything, anywhere, that uses this logo.  Please ping me if you respond, because I'll probably forget to come back here.  Nyttend (talk) 02:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * thank you for getting back to me on this-I was afraid it was going to go stale. Unfortunately, nothing that would cut the mustard-personal correspondence and a Facebook post. Not surprising they have no internet presence considering what "my" country did to theirs... (I didn't get the "Account Suspended" bit-should I mark something as a dead link?) Thanks--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. In that case, I don't think I can do it — we need some source, if for no other reason than WP:V.  And in the hours since you left this note, you've marked the dead link.  Nyttend (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Paronym
Article deleted via WP:PROD. The English wikipedia is probably the only major wikipedia without an article about the topic. —– Uanfala 11:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please add references! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Monica Kulling
I fully understand the need for G5 deletion of this page; it's just a shame because the article just went through AfD and another editor and I put some work into finding enough sources for a keep consensus and I had already begun incorporating them into the entry, only some of which are listed in the AfD discussion itself. Might it be possible to userify this to me so I can have those refs? I'll re-write the prose of the entry from scratch before re-publishing. Thanks for considering. —Innisfree987 (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * if you just want the refs they were:           Hut 8.5  20:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Candidly I was hoping for the source version with refs already properly formatted so I didn't have to do that all over again! Is it any better to email it to me instead of userify? I understand if it's just a no-go though. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, I've sent you an email.  Hut 8.5  17:57, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I've undeleted. Pages that have survived AFD may not be speedy deleted (unless they're found to be copyvios) aside from housekeeping-type reasons such as G6 or F8; the WP:CSD policy doesn't allow a G5 speedy here.  Nyttend (talk) 11:40, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Northern Ford Premiership
Contest PROD. Article has significant notability as a historical professional rugby league competition. Previous request for undeletion a month ago was ignored. —86.3.174.49 (talk) 17:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:FXPRIMUS
''I, GemnavEEr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' GemnavEEr (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  20:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Rival
50.200.196.50 (talk) 20:28, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Rival
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Alepo
''I, 2601:280:4580:240:83:9E57:5927:EE5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2601:280:4580:240:83:9E57:5927:EE5 (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Zied Chaari (Inventor)
37.211.154.25 (talk) 23:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Zied Chaari (Inventor)d


 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:FXPRIMUS
''I, GemnavEEr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' GemnavEEr (talk) 22:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Comparison of font editors
''I, John doe 120, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' — john doe 120 (talk) 05:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @John doe 120: Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

alex vandoros
recover my texts —Alexios Vandoros (talk) 21:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This reads like a résumé and was highly promotional content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)