Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 272

Hernan Aguilar
{{subst:refund|1= Hernan Aguilar |2= There is no reason to delete the page of this Argentine renowned director. There is plenty of evidence on major National TV programs, interviews, and newspaper articles (I could count more than 20) that refer to Hernan Aguilar and his popular film Madraza which was bought and distributed by The Walt Disney Company. You can check on IMDB.com, i could include hundreds of links, or really any google search or youtube search including "hernan aguilar madraza" will come up with thousands of results, videos on youtube, facebook, and major newspapers, where you can see him in major talk shows and the biggest news channels. I don't understand why anyone would delete this article, and it is suspicious that the user that did it deleted 177 pages in such a short time. please let me know of the necessary steps to undelete this article. the reason given was wp:director, and the article follows all the guidelines for WP:DIRECTOR :Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals: The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. YES ( on many major pages, and you can even see an interview at the DAC webpage, the Directors Asociation) The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. YES (many critics mention this, for his unusual genre mix)   The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. YES he has created many critically acclaimed films that have been shown in cinema theatres around the country. The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, YES (c) has won significant critical attention, YES. In summary: this article was about a famous Argentine director who's film was bought by Disney, and there is no reason to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nanernan (talk • contribs) 16:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Better references than IMDB are needed. see Hernan Aguilar. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Inexhibit
Jpboudin (talk) 20:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Seth Frankoff
Notable now after he was promoted to the major leagues. —Yankees10 22:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @Yankees10: Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Creamy Cocktails and Other Delights
Futuragirl (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @Futuragirl: Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!"--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Futuragirl – for this to be accepted you will need to cite reliable, secondary, independent sources that discuss the subject in substantive detail. Such sources are needed to demonstrate the topic's notability and to verify its information content. Please remove your citation to another Wikipedia page. See WP:CIRCULAR.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

‘arif
I noticed that the page I created was deleted as copyvio. I created it while working on the dab page "Arif". This is not my area of expertise, so I have no slightest recollection what I did, but it is inconceivable to me that I cut and pasted something from a book. Can someone please temporarily restore the page with history into my user space, so I understand what happened. —Staszek Lem (talk) 22:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done I'm afraid this was a copyright violation and we can't restore those, even to userspace. However I have managed to find out what happened here and it isn't your fault. You created this page by splitting out from another article in this edit. The text was added to the previously existing article by an IP in this edit in 2006, and that IP is the plagiarist. I am confident that the original addition was copyvio as the book given as the source was published in 2005.  Hut 8.5  22:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thx; I updated wikipedia accordingly, from the plagiarized ref. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Narihito Munakata 1
''I, 100.37.145.253, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 100.37.145.253 (talk) 01:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Currently working on gathering more information about N. Munakata through qualitative research. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —100.37.145.253 (talk) 01:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" The page needs a lot of work, including a claim of importance and independent references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Okika Technologies Inc.
''I, Greefkes, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Greefkes (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Grow.com (company)
199.192.165.58 (talk) 15:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Peter Warren (musician)
Contest PROD. Jazz musician who appears in standard encyclopedias. (I'm presuming the deleted article is about the bassist born 1935.) —Chubbles (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * . Not the same person. The deleted article is a one-liner about a New Zealand drummer "who played drums in bands including Lip Service and DD Smash." Feel free to start a new article about the bassist of the same name. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * OK Thanks Chubbles (talk) 21:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Adam9007/A7 myths debunked
Deleted under U1, but I feel it's time for it to return. —Adam9007 (talk) 23:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done  Hut 8.5  09:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Mdd/Visualization
Use page under construction (and temporarily blanked to put the content off line but not as deletion request). I would like to proceed and get its history back —Mdd (talk) 10:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, history restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:37, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:TopSpeed.com
''I, WikiAlexandra, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' WikiAlexandra (talk) 00:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Federația Internaționala a Asociațiilor Inventatorilor
''I, 2604:2000:E254:8A00:2CBB:95B1:665D:D57B, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 2604:2000:E254:8A00:2CBB:95B1:665D:D57B (talk) 01:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There is no chance that this will be accepted on English Wikipedia. Either consider Romanian wiki or translate it to English. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:31, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Oxford University Wine Society
Appears to have been maliciously or accidentally deleted —85.255.237.119 (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. COrrect process for deletion appears to have been followed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Hakim Ludin
''I, ScienceGuard, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' ScienceGuard (talk) 10:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Ksenia_Kuzmenko&action=edit&redlink=1
J araneo (talk) 18:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. add template when you are ready, or move it yourself to article space. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Banerjee test
The reason given for deletion is highly subjective ("Insanely technical page."). —89.101.206.54 (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  18:00, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center
140.163.0.5 (talk) 20:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Vitaliy Poliakov
Page was deleted as it was missing references to reliable sources. They're provided below:

—StarCruiserNY (talk) 03:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * References from the subject themselves are not considered reliable in the slightest. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 04:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The page wasn't deleted for that reason it was deleted for being promotional. It was deleted in accordance with WP:G11, and is therefore ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You'll have to ask the deleting administrator about that. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Seems like a reference from a reliable source was required for the biography of a living person as per this proposed for deletion talk. I provided the references to scientific articles published by reliable sources about Polykov, not by Polyakov. Only the last reference is to a book he worked on that's been recently published. 01:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * There has not ever been an article at Vitaliy Polyakov. Where was it originally published? ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 18:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Somebody changed the title of the article linked without giving a reason, I've changed it back.  Hut 8.5  19:58, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The article was here: [Vitaliy Poliakov]. 01:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sierra Cartwright
''I, Whitpach, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Whitpach (talk) 05:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:35, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:UARM
Siaopan (talk) 07:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ultimate Products
I want to finish it —Powerscourt Consumer (talk) 12:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Alejandro Jenkins
This was deleted because the article was largely about the contents of a single Scientific American story by the subject. It seems to me that that called from improving article, rather then deleting it. The article had been created several years ago. —Eb.hoop (talk) 23:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nine Satra - The Legend of Muay Thai
Puckapao (talk) 08:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

BOMcheck
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Aidan.turnbull (talk) 16:27, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Interesting when user requests undeletion before I delete the thing. WP:CSD. Cheers, Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this page is a copyright violation.  Hut 8.5  17:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Marcquelle Ward
This person is of importance to the acting world. His body of work alone speaks volumes and should be reinstated. A recognised person on IMDB. Verified on Facebook, Twitter, Vine. Pivotal person in the British acting industry —Mcnia (talk) 09:27, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Marcquelle Ward, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I should point out that we don't use wikis or social media as sources, and being on IMDb, Facebook, et al does not grant notability by our standards. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

SongsNepal
SongsNepal is an online leading entertainment portal from Nepal, popular globally and ranking 10 most visited Nepali Website and in entertainment category of Nepal. SongsNepal intends to promote Nepali Music and allow easy access to Nepali Music Videos for Genuine Nepali Music Lovers through one source. With successful socializing of SongsNepal through various events and online apps, it has already been one of the most common online Brand for the Internet users here in Nepal and abroad. —Ghsian (talk) 08:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.  Hut 8.5  17:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Man on the Moon III
''I, 1Sire, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 1Sire (talk) 11:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  18:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Ever-1.jpg
Picture was deleted because "free equivalent available"? Where? (Original pic was non-commercial use & permission explicitly given to Wikipedia + fair-use rationale; I don't fully understand the deletion log) —2A02:C7D:8EAB:9100:2CA3:366A:270D:EC6D (talk) 22:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done "Replaceable" means that someone could take a new photo of the android and release it freely (for commercial use). If you can demonstrate that EveR-1 no longer exists then its use could be justified as it is no longer possible to photograph. Perhaps you could ask Korea Institute of Industrial Technology to provide an image that has a compatible licence - free for commercial use and modification.   Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd be very surprised if EveR-1 still exists, because didn't Hiroshi Ishiguro once say that his actroids' silicone skin shrinks too much after 2 years? and KITECH have moved on to EveR-4. 2A02:C7D:8EAB:9100:302E:6CCE:1404:8081 (talk) 07:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * There is some confusion about the wording of the original license from KIST (Internet Archive link). The English text includes the phrase "provided that it is not used for commercial purpose", but this phrase is not there in the Korean text (at least not according to Google Translate). Do we know if the KIST representative sent the email in both languages (Korean and English), or if the English was added by a Wikipedian translator?  If we added the English ourselves, why was the phrase "provided that it is not used for commercial purpose" added if it wasn't there in the original Korean? Can we double-check the history of the deleted page to see if that phrase was added at a later time?  Do we know which Wikipedia editor pasted the KIST license into Wikipedia, and can we ask them why the phrase "provided that it is not used for commercial purpose" is present in the English version but not in the Korean version? (Edit: it was Ujames12 but they haven't contributed for 9 years so I don't know if they're still reachable.) I think there's a possibility that this was a free image after all but that somehow got lost in translation.  (see also Korea Open Government License which seems to have been alluded to in the message) 2A02:C7D:8EAB:9100:302E:6CCE:1404:8081 (talk) 08:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The English and Korean texts were both added by User:Lakshmix within an hour of each other. An email like this should really be sent to OTRS rather than an individual editor so that other people can examine it. (Lakshmix has since been blocked as a sockpuppet so don't bother asking them for anything.)  Hut 8.5  18:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:PTSD Journal
173.54.171.36 (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Aayo1978/sandbox/ContractCareers
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aayo1978 (talk • contribs) 06:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Rajveer Singh(Actor)
The page seems to be have been deleted accidentally. I request the administrators to please review and restore the article. This page contains the biography of a well known Indian Television actor who is of a lot of significance to the industry. Hence, I request for the page to be restored or at least the content be e-mailed to me, so that I can make an improvement and re-submit it. —CuriousNinja (talk) 09:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done the page was deleted because you blanked it. That was interpreted as a deletion request. The page had previously been turned into a redirect, if you want to view the content without being redirected click here.  Hut 8.5  18:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

So, now, I assume that I can re-edit and save the page again? I need help, as I am new to this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuriousNinja (talk • contribs) 05:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Toni Graham
''I, Venuslands, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Venuslands (talk) 00:49, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  14:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:TPConnects
''I, Raju Dubai, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Raju Dubai (talk) 06:30, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  14:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Furies: Erinyes
I would like the article page (and the Talk page) to be undeleted, for the content to be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace. The article is a work in progress towards completion as an encyclopaedic featured article page. The article was deleted as "Miscellany for deletion" ("prod") with criteria of: "Original research. Phenomenal, yes, but not encyclopaedic". —FUSTER1965 (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Furies: Erinyes, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.  Hut 8.5  15:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nathan Matthewson Shippee
OrangeMouse (talk) 20:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  15:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jeff Tidball
Renee in mich (talk) 19:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. We do already have an article on this person at Jeff Tidball, I suggest you incorporate this material into that article as we don't have duplicate articles on topics.  Hut 8.5  15:06, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

UrbanClap
It was the first time I had written on this title while being aware it's previous deletion records. The matter was with the language, my article was labeled as no different from the previous ones. But I have never seen how previous ones were because they were actually deleted. I wrote the article after having a good read around the other articles of the similar kind. I was ready to improvise but it was speedy deletion so I was left with no choice. The company passes WP:GNG as there are plenty of sources. And I believe just having a bad article written on a notable subject does not disqualify it from having a Wikipedia page. So now I would like to request an undelete to improve it. —Bulle Shah (talk) 16:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This is at DRV already. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 23:03, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Please discuss this at Deletion review/Log/2017 June 16 rather than here, that is the correct venue.  Hut 8.5  15:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Kenneth_Calhoun
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Kencalhount (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, this page does note why this is a significant contributor and does have 3 sources/citations.
 * ❌ I don't think those sources were independent. However since this was speedy deleted with A7, you should ask User talk:DGG about it. Also intewrsting is that user:DangerousPanda rejected a speedy delete nomination a day earlier but it was deleted anyway. If this was about you, I suggest you read WP:Autobiography. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:European Plate Observing System
''I, LucaPost, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' LucaPost (talk) 13:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Anant Narlikar
The deletion reason was stated "Expired PROD, concern was: The references were fake and dead. Needs correct references to avoid deletion". Would you please check if the deleted article was about Indian scientist Anant Vishnu Narlikar, member of Indian National Science Academy? If it is about him — I've noticed myself that many of these academicians have nonworking links to the INSA database, however the correct link can be easily found and replaced; e.g. the A.V. Narlikar's profile is http://insaindia.res.in/detail/N93-1128. If more references are needed than this one - please userfy it for me, so I can find and supply the others as well. —Tatewaki (talk) 02:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done userfied to User:Tatewaki/Anant Narlikar, you should feel free to move this back to the article namespace when you like as this was a contested proposed deletion.  Hut 8.5  15:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Xpress Money
''I, JnaedAkra, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' JnaedAkra (talk) 04:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Jazi Zadeh
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Zaberta110 (talk) 07:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC) Hi I have provided the references for Jazi Zadeh and would like to continue editing this page. Thank you, Zaberta110
 * ✅ Turned into a draft at Draft:Jazi Zadeh. Please add references and clear claims of importance before moving back to an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:James Culleton
''I, Mkochsch, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mkochsch (talk) 02:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

United Nations Youth Association of the Philippines
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jerzmac (talk) 09:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

This is not a copyright violation because I have permission from the owner.
 * Not only do you need permission, you must prove to everyone that you have permission and what that permission is. The simplest way to prove it will be for the owner of the blog unap1947unyap to put up a message or comment on the blog to say that it has the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL license.  Another way is via email to the WP:OTRS team to prove that you can release their content under this license. Once the license is proven ask again here, and give us the link to the site with copied content with the new copyright notice. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Gordon Griffin
''I, Rogersansom, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rogersansom (talk) 12:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

I am requesting this draft article be un-deleted. I hope I am following the correct procedure, apologies if not, I am not computer-savvy and have only created three or four Wikipedia articles, some years ago. (I presume that I will be contacted if the draft is re-instated, or do I just keep looking?) My reason is that I consider the subject of this submission an interesting and prominent practitioner in a very specialised field. My submission, at which I made several re-drafts, was turned down by an editor who responded that the subject was not notable. This seemed final and I left it. Last month I received a message re deletion. Yesterday I read that the subject has been awarded an MBE honour in the Queen's Birthday Honours List. Recognition at national level seems an argument against non-notability, and certainly something fresh to include in a new submission. Thus I am requesting un-deletion so that I can try again. Alternatively I have my previous draft as a computer file, so could start the process over, but requesting un-deletion seems the right approach as far as I can discern. Thank you.

ROGER SANSOM

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Rogersansom (talk) 12:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @Rogersansom: Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Universal Capital Bank AD Podgorica
''I, Naz081, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Naz081 (talk) 18:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring
''I, SunTzuWarmaster, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SunTzuWarmaster (talk) 13:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Google Bomb Miserable Failure.png
I am looking to restore a previous version of this file. The previous versions were deleted under F5 - Orphaned, non-free revisions. This deletion was valid, but the version that remains has been reduced in size by DatBot to the point where it is completely illegible. The size/resolution had already been reduced, , and. The fourth reduction in size was just too much for a screenshot. Care will need to be taken that Template:non-free reduce is not added again. Thank you. —menaechmi (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Amr_Awadallah
The page was nominated for seven days with no objection under Proposed deletion. I think a lot of work has been poured into the article with all the vetting and good referencing. The page was created in the first place with a suggestion that this page need creation while I was browsing Cloudera Inc. page. It was deleted while I was away during my college exams. —Khaled Abolaynain (talk) 23:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Lisa Olstein
Lisa Olstein is a prominent poet with a forthcoming collection of poetry (her fourth) debuting from Copper Canyon Press in October, 2018. Her oeuvre and influence continue to expand and deserves documentation/representation. She is the current co-director of the New Writers Project at the University of Texas at Austin where she also teaches at the Michener Center for Writers--a program ranked among the top ten MFA programs in the United States. She falls within the poetic lineage of James Tate and C.D. Wright. As found editor of the literary magazine jubilat and a lyricist for the singer Jeffrey Foucault, she wears a variety of artistic hats. Her work far exceeds that of other poets featured on Wikipedia and the rationale to delete this page (see below) seems insufficient given that her body of work continues to grow, inspiring conversations within literary and musical communities across the United States. The reason cited for deleting her page was, "Listed sources are not what convinces actual independent notability and substance and her works are only held in 779 libraries, and the highest only being 277, which may if at all be a significant achievement in..." I was unable to find the rest of the reasoning. If undeleted, I will personally comb through the previous article's sources to ensure scholarly credibility and supplement with additional research as needed. —KatelinKelly (talk) 00:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Sometimes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sometimes_I_can%27t_relate, this article was deleted within few hours after i created with A9 clause, but the article subject was credible and had 3-4 artists having wiki articles, so please let me know if A9 is applicable for the deletion. Please retrieve the article Populationindex (talk) 04:41, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * For speedy delete like this you should ask the deleter: . So which of Eric Roberts T C Stallings, Téa Mckay, Jenn Gotzon, Dey Young, Rachel Hendrix, David Topp have articles?  If you use the WP:Wikilink like this Eric Roberts you can see if the link is blue and it goes to the correct person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Yi Gu
''I, RichardYee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' RichardYee (talk) 06:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ramesh Mehta (comedian)
''I, Gazal world, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gazal world (talk) 09:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Recostudio1037
The following conclusion can be drawn from this passage in the encyclopaedia: Although the historian who wrote this passage does not seem to believe in the full sense that Islam is the religion of Allâhu ta'âlâ, he admits that it is a perfect religion, that it enjoined belief in one Allah, and that it made a civilized nation from the savage Arabs, and he specially praises and lauds our Prophet. huseyinhilmiisik.com huseyinhilmiisik.com --Recostudio1037 (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC) and then click the "Save page" button below —Recostudio1037 (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ Firstly the page is not deleted yet . Secondly the page is not in English, and thirdly it has an unsuitable name and no context as to what it is about. So it is unsuitable as an article. Perhaps you want this as a personal sandbox, and if so it can be moved for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * To all of which I want to add that it isn't even an article. It's a single arbitrary paragraph copied from the German Wikipedia article on encyclopedias. Largoplazo (talk) 11:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Annika Bruhns
''I, MiMee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' MiMee (talk) 12:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * @MiMee: Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Alliance éthio-française of Dire Dawa
''I, Nesrine.khelifi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Nesrine.khelifi (talk) 14:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Alliance éthio-française of Dire Dawa
need to improve the article and then click the "Save page" button below —Nesrine.khelifi (talk) 14:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ draft restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gennaro_Napolitano
I have a new draft that is correctly cited with official news articles. —MuaazShakeel (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Then I suggest you put it into Draft:Gennaro Napolitano. Social media, official sites and IMDB are insufficient.  We need newspapers and magazines etc. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jane_Maree_Kitto_Andersson
''I, Johan-fridell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Johan-fridell (talk) 09:35, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Urška Arlič Gololičič
Julia Dobry (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jane_Maree_Kitto_Andersson
We have now managed to gather a number of better sources in order to complete the article so it would be wonderful if it could be restored again. —Johan-fridell (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. OK no need to ask twice Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Wendel AE/sandbox
''I, Wendel AE, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Wendel AE (talk) 12:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. This page was a blatant copyright violation of this pdf.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:MNI Targeted Media Inc.
IdaValloMorris (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:MNI_Targeted_Media_Inc.&action=edit&redlink=1
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:University of Alberta Faculty of Arts
''I, 142.244.40.27, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 142.244.40.27 (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Retrovision
Although it was a "local event" it kick-started the entire Retro gaming movement in the UK and was unique of it's time —80.229.251.23 (talk) 16:32, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)