Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 285

Draft:Olson Communications Inc.
Speedily deleted G7, but the questions the principal author is asking about it at the Articles for creation help desk and at the Teahouse suggest that at least one other editor has contributed to it, even if only in the form of explaining what was wrong with it. This also appears to be the source of a cut-and-paste move to Olson Communications Inc., with the G7 possibly intended to conceal the history of the page. Undeletion would be appreciated so that what is going on can be untangled. There will be plenty of opportunity to delete it from draft later. —Worldbruce (talk) 23:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please turn this into a redirect if it is required for attribution. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Three Legged Dog
Reached #1 on the ARIA chart, so is notable per WP:NALBUMS. I don't know how extensive the article was before, but I intend to work on it if it isn't up to scratch. — Jjamesryan (talk &#124; contribs) 04:03, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done That page is not about an album, but an unconnected non-notable band. I assume you are asking about The Cruel Sea (band). No one has written about this album yet. So you can start one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

KL International School of Chongqing Bashu
''I, SchoolConfi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SchoolConfi (talk) 17:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  20:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Fatherland-Nebe.jpg
This file was originally listed as a fair use image in SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer to illustrate the appearance of the rank insignia in media, specifically the black SS uniform in film. A discussion about this was also held here. The matter (now three years ago), was quickly dropped when the deletion nominator became upset and made hostile statements, threatened to use their admin powers to block others in the discussion then admitted they were holding resentment about a previous matter from about a year before that. The deletion discussion then abruptly ended. Its since been determined this image is most likely under copyright, but could be allowed in the article under fair use to illustrate the appearance of the insignia in media. Note: I am not wishing to revisit what was said three years ago between editors; only that I was recently contacted about why this image was removed and wish to see if this deletion can be given another look. -O.R.Comms 21:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC) —O.R.Comms 21:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You'll need to take this to deletion review, this page is only for undoing uncontroversial deletions and this was deleted as the result of a deletion discussion (the deleting admin appears to be inactive). Personally I don't think you're going to get very far by arguing that this should be restored as fair use.  Hut 8.5  21:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I might actually just leave this one alone. There was a lot of anger about this three years ago and I don't want to reopen feuds and bad feelings. -O.R.Comms 21:18, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

inovair
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —DVespremi (talk) 18:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

I substantially revised the page and asked that it not be deleted before the revised version was reviewed. Please restore so that this version can be reviewed.


 * Given the reason for deletion you will need to ask the deleting admin, User:Explicit. Personally I don't think the changes you made would have changed the result of the discussion.  Hut 8.5  20:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The deleting admin is, but I agree the most recent revision would still qualify for deletion as spam. If you are being paid to edit, please see WP:PAID for instructions on disclosing your paid editing relationships, as you entered in a legal obligation to do so when you created your account. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Alidivandari-work2.jpg
It's Ali Divandari's work with OTRS #2011042710008208. — Hafez  Talk  19:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * See my note above. While the names of the works aren't mentioned explicitly in the release, the release covers works uploaded by the account who uploaded them. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:33, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Chinese enclaves in Silicon Valley

 * legitimate article topic deleted due to WP:G5 —Prisencolin (talk) 06:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I suggest you talk to the deleting admin, User:Sphilbrick. G5 can be used to delete articles on legitimate encyclopedic topics.  Hut 8.5  06:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It seems to be a valid deletion, which doesn't mean the contents are useless, but deleted per wp:deny. Frabkly, I'm not fully sure what our policy is regarding restoration. I have a vague recollection that it be permitted if someone else, i.e. you, take responsibility but I'm not quite sure how that works.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  12:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi - we can restore it if someone else is willing to take responsibility, however if we're not comfortable restoring something created by a sockpuppet we can always email the content or paste a copy of the content in someone's userspace, if we don't want to deny the sockmaster recognition. I know that I've done that on more than one occasion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's exactly what I am planning, if they confirm they still want it.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure I'll take responsibility for this. Btw sorry about the formatting not sure what happened.--Prisencolin (talk) 15:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll respond by email.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  16:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Email sent.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  16:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay, I responded to the email, thanks.--Prisencolin (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅-- S Philbrick (Talk)  02:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Alidivandari-smilemonalisa.jpg
It is Ali Divandari's book cover with OTRS #2011042710008208. — Hafez  Talk  19:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * We will need confirmation from an OTRS agent that the permission is valid before restoring this. Same goes for the image below.  Hut 8.5  20:12, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, the OTRS permission letter was in Persian, but Google Translate revealed the contents to be a release under the terms of GFDL 1.2 or newer. The email was signed with the author's links (Facebook and Wikipedia) including a Yahoo email address, which don't really do anything to confirm his identity, but I think we can assume good faith that the person is who he claims to be. The image isn't a self-portrait or photograph, but a creative work. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Well the image is a book cover, unless the book is self-published I think the copyright is likely to be with the publisher rather than the author. I don't think GFDL 1.2 is sufficient for a 2011 upload in any case.  Hut 8.5  06:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

David Bozza
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Aussiesport1 (talk) 03:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Content will be uploaded from sources
 * Yes check.svg Done To avert g13 deletes you could move this to your own userspace. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Exsite Webware
''I, Santamoly, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Santamoly (talk) 08:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:57, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Graham Oliver
Graham Oliver is my grandfather and we would both like the page undeleted as i was proud to show people the facts, career and life about him. All descriptions within the page was correct. I would have created a fresh page myself but this page which was deleted was fine. —Groywiki (talk) 08:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

User:Siratul_Mustakim
That is user page. I am not using it as my personal website or something else. Why it has been deleted? —Siratul Mustakim (talk) 10:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * What was there looked to be an article about you. This is a WP:FAKEARTICLE. What you could keep on your page would be the green box headed "Informations about users". If you did have hundreds or thousands of edits to Wikipedia the userpage may have been kept. But instead most of the writing you did on Wikipedia was about yourself. Do you want me to get back the green box of userboxes for you?  Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Juan J. de Pablo
''I, Lequieu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lequieu (talk) 17:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  19:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Carpet Mills Arts District
''I, Rachelautumn, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rachelautumn (talk) 01:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Thirtysomething (disambiguation)
Is the deleted dabpage (almost) similar to Thirty-something (disambiguation)? If so, can the deleted logs be transferred to that newer dabpage? —George Ho (talk) 20:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, histories merged (including the talk page). ~Anachronist (talk) 20:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Outside GC
''I, Lynnkuzneski, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lynnkuzneski (talk) 15:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Big Frog Franchise Group
I was not finished creating the article Alyssaw212 (talk) 17:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You'll need to work on it else it will be deleted again in six months, and you will have a much harder case to make to restore it. For now: Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Fontself
''I, FranzHoffman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' FranzHoffman (talk) 09:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Pilar Corrias Gallery
''I, Venitkol, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Venitkol (talk) 15:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

PH Games
Deleted as a hoax, and it was a rather queer one if I recall. Can this be archived to List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/PH Games? —Adam9007 (talk) 01:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Bernardo Urbina
Enter your reasoning here and then click the this page is a legit source of information. Bernardo aurbina is a reknowed furniture designer. He has been featured in the NY times. He studied in Pratt institute later gpt a masters in politecnico di milano and relocated for 3 years to Philippines before starting his Brand in Costa Rica.

Save page" button below —201.191.198.239 (talk) 21:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please add some extra information and sources for it! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Stephen Matthew Gill
''I, LadyMay, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' LadyMay (talk) 02:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Codeproof
''I, Shilpacs, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Shilpacs (talk) 05:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWICS_Group_of_Companies
Its a normal company page which represents WWICS group, consisting of Various Companies, the intention to keep this page was to make people aware about WWICS group and not promoting company or Its Services, However targeting WWICS group of companies a claim has been made that it just reflects information from Company Website however you can check the website http://www.wwicsgroup.com/ the content is no where taken from website or representing anything which is available on website , requesting page restoration —Abhinav Poonia 07:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/WWICS Group of Companies, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Eminemshakethat.jpg
I'm currently fixing errors in the music templates and spotted this error. The file was speedy deleted as F5: Unused non-free media file for more than 7 days in 2016. - The template fields in the article had been messed up by a user at that time, making it impossible for the image to be displayed. The user added a  field to the Track Listing template, which meant that the Extra Cover template couldn't function. This file was deleted in error and should be restored. —X201 (talk) 11:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done  Hut 8.5  18:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Regional Democracy
''I, 62.253.255.124, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 62.253.255.124 (talk) 11:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  20:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Peter Mimi
This is a famous film director why his article was deleted Is it possible to create an article about him? —156.216.188.93 (talk) 00:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is possible. Start over, preferably at Draft:Peter Mimi and submit it for review via Articles for creation. This one was deleted for being promotional. Wikipedia should never be used for publicity or promotion. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Alexander Monteith (surgeon)
I believe this page was speedy deleted in error.No reasons were given and I cannot think of any reason why it should be deleted. I'd be grateful if it could be restored. If this is not agreed please send me the reasons and email a copy of the article to me Papamac (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, restored. It wasn't deleted in error, it was deleted because you blanked it, which is interpreted as a request to delete in accordance with WP:G7. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

List of Powerhouse Films releases
The aim of the page is to create an article exactly the same as that which exists for Arrow Films found here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_Films. Powerhouse Films is also a UK distributor of classic, horror, and cult films on Blu-ray and DVD. If a page is required for Powerhouse Films similar to that of Arrow Films this can also be created e.g. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_Films. It would useful to understand why these pages are allowed but not for those of Powerhouse Films as the aim in creating such pages is to serve the same function. —Rockwell05 (talk) 18:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * As the page was deleted by a deletion discussion it doesn't qualify for restoration through this process. I suggest you talk to the deleting admin (most recently User:DGG) or ask at deletion review. The central issue is the lack of evidence that the subject meets the notability guidelines. The argument of "why do we have an article on X then" doesn't go down too well around here.  Hut 8.5  20:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * You might try to make an article on the company, not just a list of films. Please do it as a draft via the WP:Article Wizard, not in mainspace. DGG ( talk ) 21:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Rex Brinkworth
He is a notable person, founder of the UK Down's Syndrome Association —Paulgwilliams (talk) 10:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Günter Bechly
I am a researcher interested in the relationship between science and Wikipedia and wanted to see not so much the article for Günter Bechly, but the rather its talk page and edit history. I know it was deleted due to WP:CAN after pro-IDers flocked to the page. It is these processes that preceded the article's deletion that interest me for academic purposes. Is there any way to receive access to an already deleted talk page? And, more importantly, to the different edits that were made overtime (i.e. the changelgo)? —Wikigenstein (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC) Wikigenstein (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Here is the revision history of the talk page Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

(diff) 06:01, 14 October 2017. . JJMC89 (talk | contribs ) (657 bytes) (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G8). | TW) (diff) 15:20, 13 October 2017. . PaleoNeonate (talk | contribs ) (645 bytes) (title, sign, reply) (diff) 14:20, 13 October 2017. . 178.157.250.81 (talk ) (41 bytes) (←Created page with 'Where is the page? Why has it been moved?') (diff) 15:11, 23 March 2017. . Kevmin (talk | contribs ) (3,685 bytes) (→‎Notability?) (diff) 13:17, 23 March 2017. . Oharar (talk | contribs ) (3,191 bytes) (diff) 17:35, 26 April 2015. . Hza a 9 (talk | contribs ) (2,852 bytes) (diff) 17:19, 21 August 2012. . Dr. Günter Bechly (talk | contribs ) (2,747 bytes) (→‎Article by the subject: odonate phylogeny is ...) (diff) 13:19, 21 August 2012. . Brookie (talk | contribs ) (2,192 bytes) (→‎Article by the subject: Thanks - is there an article to be created in your PhD subject odonate phylogeny? I have no idea what it is!) (diff) 11:06, 21 August 2012. . Dr. Günter Bechly (talk | contribs ) (1,823 bytes) (→‎Article by the subject: response by subject) (diff) 08:22, 20 August 2012. . Brookie (talk | contribs ) (980 bytes) (The subject is now openly editing the article) (diff) 12:40, 14 August 2012. . PKT (talk | contribs ) m (678 bytes) (diff) 12:40, 14 August 2012. . PKT (talk | contribs ) (677 bytes) (diff) 12:26, 14 August 2012. . Brookie (talk | contribs ) (374 bytes) (→‎Article by the subject: new section)
 * Here is last version before afd delete (I demoted the headings)

{|align="left" width=30% style="border-radius:0px 100px 100px 0px;border:10px solid #FF5A70;padding: 36px;background: none;text-align: left;margin: 0 auto;width:29%;"

Article by the subject
A feeling in my water says that this was penned by the subject - no evidence - just a hunch.  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 12:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Substantiated by reading the article's history.  PK T (alk)  12:40, 14 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The subject is now openly editing the article.  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 08:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The article was created by a colleague at our museum and subsequently expanded by myself. We are also going to add further scientists, who fulfill the relevance criteria, from our institution and other German paleontological and biological research institutions, because we noted a striking absence of German living scientists in our field of activity, compared to those of other countries (e.g. Michael S. Engel, David Grimaldi, Alexandr Pavlovich Rasnitsyn). I know that Autobiography discourages (but does not prohibit) editing pages about oneself. As long as the edits are not obviously biased, fulfill the relevance criteria, and are supplied with valid sources, I see no problem with that.--Dr. Günter Bechly (talk) 11:06, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks - is there an article to be created in your PhD subject odonate phylogeny? I have no idea what it is!  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 13:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "odonate phylogeny" is the evolutionary relationships and fossil history of dragonflies and damselflies (insect order Odonata). There is actually a section on phylogeny in nearly every article on systematic groups of organisms. I am currently adding more content on odonate phylogeny to Wikipedia, e.g. recently the page for the fossil dragonfly family Stenophlebiidae. Next will be a page for Tarsophlebiidae. Greetings--Dr. Günter Bechly (talk) 17:18, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Notability?
With all respects to the subject, are they notable enough to have their own page? By way of comparison, Volker Mosbrugger, the head of the Senckenberg museum, and also a paleontologist, doesn't have his own page. Oharar (talk) 13:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That seems to be a good point, there aren't many secondary sources that cover Mr. Bechly. Thus may be worth nominating for deletion.  For the same reason I have not tried to write an article for the preeminent myrmecologist Gennady Dlussky even though he was one of the for most ant and fossil ant taxonomist of this century.-- Kev  min  § 15:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * }


 * By our usual standards I think he does meet WP:PROF., and I intend to write an article some time this year, since  I frequently writearticles on scientists. As for Mossburger,  the head of a major museum has always been found notable at WP.  As for Dlussky essentially everyone who's ever described new taxa has been. Secondary sources that meet GNG are not needed for people who meet WP:PROF, which can be shown by citations alone, and has been so used in thousands of discussions, with fewer than 1% of aberrant decisions. The   exceptions have usually been where there is some reason why people are looking for an excuse to delete. For the subject to push for getting an article has often been considered a reason., and I suggest that Dr. Bechly should stay completely uninvolved in this.  DGG ( talk ) 15:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Muhammet Ali Mevlüt Dündar
I would like to create the article but noticed it has been Speedy deleted, can it be restored so that I can add to it? —Aca rblx (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * you are welcome to write another article at this title, it was only deleted because the person who wrote it isn't allowed to edit Wikipedia.  Hut 8.5  14:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I want to better the articles about people involved in the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt Can I get a copy of the deleted article in my sandbox or does it contain the likes of personal information etc that needs to remain private?--Aca rblx (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I don't like restoring these, it tends to encourage the banned user who created the article when they shouldn't be editing at all. However I won't object if another admin wants to restore it.  Hut 8.5  20:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I understand, perhaps you could email the contents to me?--Aca rblx (talk) 17:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Depends, what are you going to do with the contents if I do that?  Hut 8.5  18:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Adobe photoshopelements2.jpg
Image was deleted under F5 due to being removed (partially) by vandalism now fixed on Adobe Photoshop Elements —KylieTastic (talk) 18:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, image restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jay Schwartz
''I, ARouleau, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' ARouleau (talk) 20:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ already by . ~Anachronist (talk) 17:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Agata potato.
This talk page should be undeleted and moved with no redirect to Talk:Agata potato. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

I. Kudigame
Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. — Greenbörg  (talk)  15:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

C. Sandanayake
Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. — Greenbörg  (talk)  15:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Ajantha (cricketer)
Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. — Greenbörg  (talk)  15:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

G. Fernando
Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. — Greenbörg  (talk)  15:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

C. Thusara
Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. — Greenbörg  (talk)  15:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

D. Kodikara
Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. — Greenbörg  (talk)  15:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

D. de Silva
Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. — Greenbörg  (talk)  15:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Cliff Chapman
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —The Magic Wanderer (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Cliff Chapman - "unsuccessful actor" is libellous and career damaging. Cliff Chapman works as an actor, represented by Meredith Westwood Management Ltd and London Voiceover, and regularly books work with amongst other employers, The Black Library, part of the Worldwide Brand Games Workshop limited, as a voiceover actor, as well as Big Finish for their Pathfinder Legends audio drama range, again based on an international brand game. Recent commercial clients include Dulux paint for a voiceover to a web ad. An actor is not only successful if they appear in Hollywood movies or top rated TV shows. An actor is successful if he or she continues to earn a living. Cliff Chapman has a valid IMDB, UK Spotlight page, Equity union membership, and many 2017 credits.

Cliff Chapman also appeared in The Future Boys Trilogy of stage shows and subsequent successful Kickstarter funded audio comedy-dramas. The writer, Steve Jordan has a Wikipedia page. Cliff Chapman is referenced on this. Therefore surely the actor is entitled to a page?

All CV links available via www.cliff-chapman.com

Once again, to delete the page with ref: "Unsuccessful actor" is immeasurably career-damaging and NOT correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Magic Wanderer (talk • contribs) 11:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The article was deleted with the reason "Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". That is an objective statement of fact. Nowhere does it say "unsuccessful actor." Don't invent claims of libel where none exist.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment:, I am not sure it met the criteria for being speedy deletion, which requires the person to obviously have not even a reasonable claim to importance, but if it s restored there is not a chance it will pass our regular deletion process. Wait until they aremajor articles about him, not just mention in a review,and then try in Draft space.  DGG ( talk ) 21:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

G. Jayantha
Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. — Greenbörg  (talk)  15:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Queen V (Musician)
''I, Edmartin4, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Edmartin4 (talk) 14:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Liyana de Silva
Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. — Greenbörg  (talk)  15:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  17:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

DLMA analysis
New sources for the previously deleted page establishing notability of the business tool http://www.grantthornton.co.uk/insights/the-board-creating-and-protecting-value/ https://www.perivantechnology.co.uk/boards-blog/what-is-the-ideal-mix-of-perspectives-in-your-boardroom —120.21.189.213 (talk) 22:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Horn The Hunt
''I, 46.208.71.81, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 46.208.71.81 (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The University of Oklahoma Men's Glee Club
Benhudd96 (talk) 20:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC) Draft:The University of Oklahoma Men's Glee Club
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I assume you meant Draft:The University of Oklahoma Men's Glee Club. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Anthony Baratta (designer)
Greetings,

Hope all is well. I have been handed your information from a colleague of mine in regards to our company's wikipedia page that I understand has been deleted/taken offline.

Please assist me with figuring out how we get our page back up and running successfully?

Greatly appreciate your help and hoping we can expedite this process.

Please advise how we proceed?

Thanks again,

-Tyler — AB Designs (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌Wikipedia cannot be used to promote companies or people. In this case the user that created the page was not permitted to edit. Also if people are paid to write a disclosure must be made. If it is not, all that writing must be removed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Russell Harrison (inventor)
(talk) 09:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC) I would like this page to please be undeleted. This is because I believe that the mi-pad concept counts as encyclopaedic content. This is a contribution to the construction industry and a revolution in house building. Please follow the link to show proof of the patent https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2523915}} Off site construction is becoming the future.Sw2016 (talk) 09:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Clarification needed. @Sw2016: Are you requesting that the article be restored to the main encyclopedia, or are you requesting the history be restored into draft space (i.e., to Draft:Russell Harrison (inventor))? I'm happy to do the latter, since the AfD indicated that the article might be improvable. However, it's clear from the community that an article about Harrison is not warranted at this time. —C.Fred (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Felipe Smith
This page should not be speedily deleted because this article is not unambiguous promotion and has been written from a neutral point of view; it also provides references and includes specific page numbers of bibliography consulted. This article is about a notable writer/artist who is already mentioned in many wikipedia articles(MBQ,Peepo Choo,Ghost Rider (Robbie Reyes)). --˜˜˜˜ —Kailey.marie.valentine (talk) 07:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The speedy was actually removed by a different editor as inapplicable. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 08:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I think this was a reaction to a speedy deletion proposal, which was declined. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Articles that were deleted and which are currently up for deletion as well
Hi, I am Wikipedia editor and I would like to say that a lot of articles like these ones Death of Aisling Symes, Disappearance of Carla Losey, Disappearance of David Guerrero, Anna Christian Waters, were deleted and these articles Vernon Jones, Category:Deceased American professional wrestlers, Category:Deceased English professional wrestlers, Category:Deceased English professional wrestlers are currently up for deletion. I would like to say that people who I listed were people who went missing whose disappearance WAS very notable, and the reasons that people gave for deleting them were NOT good ones. Their claims that most of the sources that I used were only local doesn't make sense to me, as most news does not make world wide news. With the exception of one person who I just met yesterday EVERYRONE ELSE who I know personally says that local news is still notable (some of the sources which I used though were not just local) and the deletion of the articles was wrong. One editor claims that make an article on dead people could get too massive, but look at this article Category:Living people which is totally massive, I think that is a poor argument, I also think there is something wrong with the deletion process and what makes these people's judgement's right in what they are claiming shouldn't be kept? I feel that this is a form of bullying and harassment and think it should stop as there should be stricter guideline against unnecessary deletion. I would like to know if I have a valid complaint, if can these articles be restored, and if we can have stricter policies against unnecessary deletion? Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Articles deleted via XfD are not eligible for undeletion here. This is also not a place for general discussion. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Where exactly do I go then? Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That depends. Deletion review is the venue for overturning XfDs. If WP:DRVPURPOSE applies, then follow WP:DELREVD. To discuss the various deletion processes/policies/guidelines, start a discussion on the process/policy/guideline's talk page. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Or back to User talk:Iridescent where the issue was first raised. If there was a "should I make an article on this?" noticeboard that would be the best place but we don't have such a thing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:52, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Royal Cruising Club (RCC)
''I, John Langdon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' John Langdon (talk) 23:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  10:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:BlueVine
''I, Golden tamarin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Golden tamarin (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

The entry is blank and I'd like to create a new, complete entry —Golden tamarin (talk) 18:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done I have restored the edit history of the previously deleted draft.  Hut 8.5  10:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Cotton candy clouds.jpg
I have the original photo in my cell phone, and already added more information about it, please be more specific and require more data that will proof my copy right and then click the "Save page" button below —Sayed_Barakat 12:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * you haven't added any information about the copyright status of the image. Wikipedia doesn't host files unless they have been released into the public domain or made available under a limited number of free licences. See File copyright tags.  Hut 8.5  15:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

MHISoft eVault
I want to retrieve the content and rework on it —Tony Xue (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Pinging User:Jimfbleak as the deleting admin. I think there may have been some sort of mistake here as the deletion reason is one which only applies to drafts and this wasn't a draft.  Hut 8.5  10:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like it was deleted because it was an advertisement, even if the delete code does not indicate that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks as if I clicked on the wrong item and didn't notice. Apart from the promotional tone, it lacks independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. I notice that this user removed speedy deletion and COI tags at least five times for each, and if this continues, here or elsewhere, a block for disruptive editing may be necessary Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  16:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Cultural Health
Please Reinstate this article because the argument for deletion is that “Cultural Health" does not exist. This is contrary to the fact. Cultural Health is a widely used term in the Unites States where I live, to include the United States Government. See Think “Cultural Health” https://www.thinkculturalhealth.hhs.gov

Not to mention more then 58 million hits in a google search of which other Wikipedia articles on aspects of this very subject are prominent in the search results. millions have viewed this Cultural Health article on Wikipedia and there has been discussion on the talk page but non that I recall about the existence of Cultural Health as a widely used term in the USA.

If you wish for me to utilize the US government as a reference i will be glad to. please reinstate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aunk (talk • contribs) 19:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 07:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

User:Bmlls/sandbox/Institute of Biomedical Laboratory Science-Laboratory Medicine
I first wanted to remove 'User:Bmlls/sandbox/' in the title —Bmlls (talk) 21:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Please delete this page because I have made a draft page of this page!

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmlls (talk • contribs) 00:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✔️ But your page Draft:Biomedical Laboratory Science Online Education is still there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nash Albert
''I, Ceribolk, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ceribolk (talk) 09:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:NUGEN Audio
''I, PaulTapper, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' PaulTapper (talk) 10:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Donald Trump and handshakes
The deleting admin has agreed to restoring Donald Trump and handshakes as a subpage of my userpage i.e. User:DrStrauss/Donald Trump and handshakes to work on with a view to selectively merging content to Donald Trump in popular culture per his closing comments at the AfD. I was not involved in the creation of the page but believe some of its content is worth saving. — Dr Strauss   talk   13:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ apologies for the delay. Please let me know if you end up using non-trivial amounts of the text elsewhere because there'll be paperwork to do to satisfy attribution requirements. If you decide to get rid of it, please arrange for the history to be moved back to the original location so it can be found if it's needed.  HJ Mitchell  &#124; Penny for your thoughts?  14:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

User:Roberta Simpson brown
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Roberta Simpson Brown (talk) 16:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:CSD by Anthony Bradbury, whom i pinged on my user talk page.Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Narada_News
Narada news is a media platform which in a short period could establish its place in Indian Journalism. The media hold the major agenda against corruption, fascism, racism and superstitious beliefs still existing in India. Narada news works in a mode similar to the performance of non-governmental organizations structure In 2016 March 14 when Narada news published the anti-corruption sting operations to public, Kolkatta high court and Supreme court of India did order probe into it. All those featured in narada sting tapes were found accepting bribe from a representative of a fictitious company. Currently, the two major investigative agencies of the country CBI and Enforcement Directorate are on prime charge of investigating the corruptions of Senior politicians found in Narada News revelations. The investigations continue to go on —Naisamkp (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * . We don't restore unambiguously promotional articles here. If you want, you may start over from scratch in your sandbox, user space, or draft space (such as Draft:Narada News) and submit it for review via Articles for creation.
 * Also, Wikipedia doesn't have articles about media platforms that "could establish its place" in journalism. The subject of an article must comply with WP:CORP inclusion criteria now, not at some unknown time in the future. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Responded to user on my talk page.Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

I want my all accounts Delete from Wikipedia, I do not have any interest anymore. Now in Wikipedia, I do not want my name to be in Wikipedia yet. Please delete my all accounts from Wikipedia.Thanks —2405:204:E408:2BF7:EB58:B781:F118:A919 (talk) 11:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , and wrong venue in any case. Accounts cannot be deleted. If you have no more interest, simply don't log in. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * comment The venue you seek is Courtesy vanishing. Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)