Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 288

Knifehandchop
I placed a request to have this userfied almost two weeks ago, and it was archived without resolution. Re-filing the request. —Chubbles (talk) 01:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done as the deleting admin appears to be inactive, see User:Chubbles/Knifehandchop.  Hut 8.5  11:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Kateb University
Want create this page, deleted under G12 —Wisalahmad523 (talk) 09:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this page is a copyright violation. You are welcome to start a new article at this title though, as long as your version isn't also a copyright violation.  Hut 8.5  11:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Apostle Suleman Johnson
Can you kindly userify the above article. It was deleted via PROD and I intend to work on it now. —ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 13:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. This was userfied to User:Mahveotm/Suleman Johnson by . ~Anachronist (talk) 05:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

File:University of Bristol Coat of Arms.png
Was deleted as unused after being removed from the article, intend to restore it back to the article —Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, restored. Please include it in an article within the next 7 days. After you have done so, remove the deletion tag from the image page. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello Design
Not sure why or when this page was deleted? Even an explanation would help. Hello is an MDC Partners agency and if you look at the page for MDC, other agencies like CP+B, Bruce Mau Design, and The Media Kitchen all have their own pages. —208.77.232.38 (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * It was deleted in July as unambiguous promotion. Further, it was created by an editor with a conflict of interest; that doesn't always mean the article is spammy, but it increases the odds. —C.Fred (talk) 18:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Also see WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. It doesn't matter what other articles may exist on Wikipedia; each one stands or falls on its own merits. If other promotional articles exist, that's a reason to delete them, not a reason to include one more. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Albi Albertsson
The article contained a list of published works including very famous songs, to which this composer was linked. It is not uncommon for fans of popular music like K-Pop to look up an overview of a specific composers works. Requesting for the page to be undeleted with possible deletion of information not backed by reliable sources. —91.66.237.80 (talk) 05:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
 * Because you originally prodded this article, you may want to consider WP:AFD instead, if the subject isn't notable. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Plays.tv
''I, Aunva6, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' -- Aunva6talk - contribs 05:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sabrina Ho
The user Primefac deleted Draft:Sabrina Ho due to "G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Editorofthepage1) in violation of ban or block". However, upon review of Draft:Sabrina Ho's history, editorofthepage1 did not create the article. —Judgewang (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Since you have started a DRV, we can let that run. It does appear that User:Kelvinlei created the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * My DRV was closed for being an "obvious sock" (I am not). I don't have time to argue with bureaucrats on Wikipedia to unblock me so I made a new account. Besides, Wikipedia is viewed by millions... if an article was incorrectly deleted (as this draft was it's quite obvious), it shouldn't matter what user is making the request... that's petty politics instead of focusing on creating a better Wikipedia for all. Simply stated, a valid article is bigger than any one user and should be treated as such. Judgewang1 (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Well in any case this page is only for undoing uncontroversial deletions, and that doesn't include G5. The right forum for contesting this is WP:DRV, or potentially WP:AN.  Hut 8.5  18:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft John Sparrow (musician)
The article was deleted due to bad links. I would like to have a chance to update with better links —Brivett924 (talk) 20:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Inkspired
''I, 94.254.171.59, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 94.254.171.59 (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.  Hut 8.5  21:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Beyond Technologies
''I, Gubp, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gubp (talk) 21:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ritual Network
''I, Kru666, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Kru666 (talk) 05:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * We would like to add more sources which support our request to get this page on Wikipedia "Save page" button below —Kru666 (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * . Who is "we"? Is the username Kru666 representative of a group, or shared between individuals? ~Anachronist (talk) 06:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Kru666 is just one person (me). I am the media contact person for www.ritualnetwork.com. I am representing this company. Therefore I used the term "we" in my request... we from Ritual Network. But it is just me who is handling the content on Wikipedia. Kru666 (talk) 07:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Please see WP:PAID and comply with it, preferably by putting the paid editor template on your user page. This is a legal obligation that you agreed to abide by when you created your username. When you have done so, reply here and I'm happy to restore the draft article. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your quick replies. This is very appreciated by me. I put the paid editor template on my user page like requested, now. Please, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kru666 Kru666 (talk) 07:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you.
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

RareNoiseRecords
RareNoiseRecords was the wiki page of our record label, operating for now 9 years in US, UK, Europe, Japan. The Label's activity has been covered in the press, quite extensively, either directly or through reviews of the Label's production. The page was created by a third party (possibly a fan) and I proceeded to maintain and expand it from there. The page was crucial, as it provided a nexus to link together all the pages of artists involved with the label, whose output was listed on their pages. We understand that the page was soft deleted, and we ask that you please revert the page to its previous state. We are happy to provide you with links / information etc that you may need. Please advise. —Gbruzzo (talk) 12:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. If you work for them, you must disclose this per Wikimedia's Terms of Use. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The AFD was closed as "soft delete" which means it's eligible for restoration by request here.
 * Please see WP:PAID and comply with it by putting a paid editing template on your user page, as you agreed to do when you created your account. I have restored the article for now, but please don't make any more changes to it until you have disclosed your paid editing status. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

User:Starletes/sandbox
Starletes (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC) Starletes
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ChocolateLMS
''I, Sweet Learning, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Sweet Learning (talk) 06:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Hillsong Church Kiev
The page was speedily deleted back in August because of a false charge of copyright violation by someone who has not done WP:BEFORE. The nominator thought the article was lifted from the church's Facebook page; however, the FB page he linked to is an _unofficial_ page; it's not the church's official page. I happen to be sure that some random fans created the page and just copied the text from the Wikipedia article (the page has a reference - "Content from the Wikipedia article Hillsong Church Kiev (contributors) licensed under CC-BY-SA"—although I don't see the content in question anywhere; I think it is a community page where the content is automatically fetched from WP, and since this content has been deleted from WP, it is also not there on the FB page). Although I now have no access to the history of the page to provide relevant links, but I happen to remember how that article mostly came about—it was a serious tug-o'-war between different contributors, so I encourage administrators to study the article history and see for themselves that the article text was not just lifted from somewhere. Moreover, Facebook Pages was introduced in November 2007, and I seem to remember that at least part of that text-congealing must have taken place _before_ that. I don't know how to look up when a particular page on Facebook was created, but I'm pretty sure the FB page in question was created years and years after the Wikipedia page; and if the page on FB is indeed a "community page", those were introduced in 2010. I can provide the original of the picture that is the userpic of this FB page (which its authors have lifted from here, Wikipedia). There was a page deletion discussion a couple of years ago, which happened without me because I don't really monitor my talk page. The result was "keep". I don't intend to put up a fight about the page as such (if someone thinks the content should be merged into the main Hillsong page, I have nothing against it), but I do take exception to an article of mine being deleted for copyright infringement where there was none. For all I know Wikipedia keeps logs of editors whose articles were deleted for copyright infringement, and my username is now on some blacklist or whatnot. So please investigate the matter per above, and please first undelete—and then merge or whatever. —Latreia (talk) 22:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Pinging User:Alex Shih as the deleting admin. The Facebook page does appear to be copying Wikipedia.  Hut 8.5  22:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * According to Timeline of Facebook, "Community Pages", which are populated with content from Wikipedia, were introduced in April of 2010. "Pages" as such were introduced on November 6, 2007. Some milestones that I remember from that time make me think that most of the article that is requested to be undeleted took shape around September-October 2007. Someone who has access to the article and its actual history can verify. Latreia (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Yes facebook copied Wikipedia, and even credits it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * My apolgies to, and thanks to and . Alex Shih (talk) 18:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Bino George
Page was PROD-ed saying does not pass WP:NFOOTY, but he's head coach in top division league, I-League in India and thus passes WP:NFOOTY —Coderzombie (talk) 09:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Ping User:ArsenalFan700 as the PROD tagger. (It looks like the team he's coaching hasn't started playing in that league yet but they're due to do so in a few days.)  Hut 8.5  18:43, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ameer Alkhawlany
''I, Bialowieza2017, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bialowieza2017 (talk) 13:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Alpha Pi Phi
I've found some secondary sources. —Naraht (talk) 14:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Ping User:Galobtter as PROD tagger.  Hut 8.5  21:42, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Brannavan Gnanalingam
''I, Mjwellington, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mjwellington (talk) 16:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Only Kashmir
''I, BilalBashirBhat, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' BilalBashirBhat (talk) 18:56, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will need independent sources to show any notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

The STEM Advocacy Institute
The page was updated after labeled for deletion. It is now up to code with what wikipedia wants. I believe it was deleted accidentally. —Fmuindi2016 (talk) 00:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
 * It was also deleted in accordance with WP:G11 for being unambiguously promotional.
 * If you are associated with the institute, you have a conflict of interest, which means you should re-start the article in draft space and submit it for review via Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:38, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

The Sting House of Brands
Dutch retail company which has over 60 shops in 4 countries. Pages appears to be have been speedily deleted. —John a s (talk) 00:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
 * It appears you took unilateral action to speedy-delete a non-promotional article without anyone nominating it for deletion. I am assuming you were using the WP:A7 criterion. I agree the article isn't ready for main space, but it may have potential in draft space. Do you object to restoring it there? ~Anachronist (talk) 00:42, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Meh, go ahead. I found sources to support its existence, but that's all; if there's anything more to support notability than what I found, so be it. DS (talk) 02:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. I have restored the article to Draft:The Sting House of Brands for you to work on and improve, then submit for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Kelly Kline
''I, 96.39.191.19, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 96.39.191.19 (talk) 00:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:56, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. for Draft:Kelly Kline which perhaps is what you want. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Samskip
Samskip derives from the Federation of Co-operatives, Samband, which started a shipping company, Samband Line, in 1943. Samband Line, a division of Samband, was changed into a limited company in 1991 called Samskip hf. Samskip employs approximately 1,500 people working in more than 26 countries worldwide as well as agents in other locations. It is a well known company and has a lot of news activity. It should therefore be on Wikipedia, without a commercial text. For example: http://www.tradewindsnews.com/daily/95272/samskip-to-buy-geest-line https://theloadstar.co.uk/coolstar/euro-container-line-acquisition-a-cool-move-for-samskip/ http://worldmaritimenews.com/archives/226064/samskip-to-expand-norway-presence-with-nor-lines-takeover/ —MitchellStrb (talk) 08:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator . Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. No prejudice to going through the drafting process, that said. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 08:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ not only the above, it was written in French and so unsuitable for en.wikipedia. You should start again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Fortis Bangalore
Fortis Bangalore is a hospital that everyone needs to know. It is different from Fortis Healthcare both in structure and management. Ideally located in Bangalore's Cunningham Road, a wikipedia page on FORTIS BANGALORE provides more scope to the health instituition. —09:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Annakoppad (talk)Annakoppad
 * You should ask User talk:Anthony Appleyard to reverse the deletion, as there was a claim of importance. 1000 beds and 4 locations should be a claim of importance. It would certainly have helped if there were references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Metagenics, Inc.
I would like a chance to do some revising if necessary. It was deleted previously, and I was told it was written in too promotional a tone. So, I cut all superiority claims and promotional statements (which were pulled from outside sources), and now it was deleted again for having SOME of the same text (G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion) User: PaleoNeonate User:Anthony Appleyard I am new to this and would love to understand how I'm supposed to approach this. I assumed another user would review the new text since I addressed the previous issue; however, it was not considered and automatically deleted for another reason. Please, please advise; thank you! —Sydniev51 (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ draft restored. The page is still too press-release-like, so should be rewritten in a more encyclopedic tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Victor Sanz
I was never notified of the article's deletion, and I feel that the notability was not properly addressed here given that the artist had multiple chart entries on Hot Country Songs. Please undelete so I can improve the article and make his notability clearer. — Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:55, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ since it was an AFD I have turned it to a draft. see Draft:Victor Sanz. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

250th Expeditionary Military Intelligence Battalion (United States)
This is a military unit page representing the new name for the battalion which is now an expeditionary military intelligence unit, which is different than the normal military intelligence unit. This is the reason for the name change and the redirect. —Policeguy31 (talk) 02:53, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I cannot figure out why anything needs to be restored. So The page "250th Military Intelligence Battalion (United States)"  has been moved to "250th Expeditionary Military Intelligence Battalion (United States)" which involved deletion and no restoring.  I hope that is what you want. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:52, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

jesselynn desmond reactivate!
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —MissAbundance (talk) 03:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC) I know for a fact that Jesselynn Desmond is an actress, singer, community leader, psychic, etc. She is in the College Football Hall of Fame for being the loudest fan. In a google search with her name JESSELYNN DESMOND you will find she comes up in every single listing in the first 20-30 pages. There is no denying she needs her own page. She is an actress ( http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1029032/) and has done 23 films and many TV shows.
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Jesselynn Desmond, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:53, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Odoo_Community_Association
Comment was added before signing in so signing this note. StuartJMackintosh (talk) 11:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

This is a valid page but requires further citations. If I can get the source, I can store off-line and post when the content is up to speed. It is important to raise the profile of the OCA as the OCA ensures that the Odoo product (one of the fastest growing business applications in Europe) remains Open Source. —195.114.103.73 (talk) 11:11, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

''I, 195.114.103.73, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 195.114.103.73 (talk) 11:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC) StuartJMackintosh (talk) 11:17, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

User:Adam9007/My problems with A7
It's about time I finished this —Adam9007 (talk) 22:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done  Hut 8.5  22:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Zaid Ali
This article strongly fulfill the criteria of General notability guideline so why it is nominated for deletions again and again, so by draft or by any source want to restore/create —Wisalahmad523 (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC) Thanks!
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. The article is, at present, salted against re-creation. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:58, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Zaid Ali (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.  Hut 8.5  22:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I can spare you the trouble of contacting me on my user page. There was a fair debate in the discussion which resulted in a clear policy-based consensus in favor of deletion. Nothing has changed in the interim. I see no reason to undelete. bd2412  T 22:51, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:James Lewicki
''I, Lisalewickihermanson1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lisalewickihermanson1 (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

international ice swimming asscoiation
I will edit the page based on your comments. I understand your comments. I am learning. There is a huge interest in my sport and others on Wikipedia are trying to hijack the interest. This is why I asked to allow the redirection of Ice Swimming to Winter Swimming to be cancelled. —Rbarkai (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5 or G11 be undeleted here. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Put you comments on Articles for deletion/International ice swimming association Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:LiveRC
This is a useful tool I have been using on the French Wikipedia and I would like to see it imported here. — « « «  SOME GADGET GEEK  » » » (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The page was totally blank, so you will get nothing if we restore it. Instead you may wish to ask here: Requests for page importation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Hillier Parker May and Rowden
''I, Philjones573, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Philjones573 (talk) 21:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Samuel Abiola Robinson
Article re created with wiki guidelines —Nabeelkallayil (talk) 02:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * See Articles for deletion/Samuel Robinson (actor). Your version is much worse than the deleted one! -- Orange Mike  &#124;  Talk  02:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * It is worth mentioning that this article has also been deleted under the name Samuel Robinson (actor). It is also suspicious that two distinct versions of the Samuel Abiola Robinson were created by different editors on the same day, so we may be looking at UDP or COI editing.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * And deleted earlier under the name Samuel Robinson (Actor) with a capital 'A'. The (actor) and (Actor) pages were created by a single-purpose account (likely the subject himself based on the username and immature comment on the userpage), and that same SPA account contributed to this latest incarnation as well as providing the only 'keep' vote in the last AFD. Probably not UDP but definitely COI. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Garrett / teh ROBLOX Player
I would like a copy of "Garrett / teh ROBLOX Player", "User:Garretttehrobloxplayer", "LUCK-e Jumper", and "LUCK-e (character)" and its revision history to be temporarily restored so I could copy the text into a text document. This should only be until February of 2018.

Edit: The account to restore to is "User:Garretttehrobloxplayer" —137.119.111.10 (talk) 01:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, as for the first one, that was deleted as WP:A7 so it's ineligible for restoration. As for the others, I could userfy them somewhere, but where? You aren't posting from an account. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Sydney Sandpipers
Expired PROD on a semi-professional national sporting team with detailed, significant coverage in reliable sources over many years. Shocked it was ever deleted. —The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 12:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. see if you can actually add some reliable sources! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:DJ Zarkin
(no text provided) Djzarkin (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Not sure what it is you want done. The draft already exists. There were 2 deleted edits in the contribution history so I restored them. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:12, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Clive Jacobs UK
''I, Dopmetoll, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dopmetoll (talk) 01:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Celebrity Big Brother 2 (disambiguation)
Can the disambiguation pages for "Celebrity Big Brother" 2, 3, 4, and 5 (disambiguation) please be moved to subsets of my user page? Although I see the public's point in the pages not needing to exist in Wikipedia's mainspace, I was wondering if I, as the creator and main editor of those pages, could still have access to the information provided in them (especially for helpful editing of the "Celebrity Big Brother" page itself.

Thank you for your assistance. Paintspot Infez (talk) 02:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC) —Paintspot Infez (talk) 02:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I combined them all into User:Paintspot/Celebrity Big Brother in your user space. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:17, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! :D Paintspot Infez (talk) 22:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

John Hoffmire
The reason that was cited for deletion from the administrator, who goes by the alias of Sandstein, was that my argument for keeping the piece was disregarded because he doesn't like that I argued using upper-case letters. This argument is ridiculous, to say the least, because an article must be deleted only if it fulfills Wikipedia's deletion criteria, not because a user doesn't like the way someone argues. Moreover, the person whom I created a Bio in Wikipedia, John Hoffmire, easily fulfills criteria 5,6 and 7 from Wikipedia's WP:NACADEMIC criteria, which should have been a strong argument in favor of keeping the article. The discussion can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Hoffmire, the administrator response to why the bio I created was deleted can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sandstein#Deletion_of_Dr._John_Hoffmire_page Finally, I do admit, that arguing with upper-case letters is not the most polite way to do it, yet, there are criteria by which Wikipedia guide discussions and settle arguments, and arguing in upper-case letters does not violate any of Wikipedia's criteria. Moreover, I'm more than willing to modify any the Bio in order to comply with any other issues there may exist in order to keep the article. Best Regards and thank you! —Mario5554 (talk) 06:18, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. All-caps on the internet is interpreted as screaming, but that wasn't why it was disregarded. It was disregarded because your argument relied on sources that are tied to the subject. It's asinine to think that a subject's alma mater or employer is a third-party source (a third-party source has no connection, direct or indirect, to the subject what-so-ever). — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 06:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This is not the proper venue. Please consider using Deletion review instead, since the article was deleted as part of a deletion discussion. Alex Shih (talk) 07:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

I understand, thank you to both of you for your kind advice! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mario5554 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Husch Blackwell
As someone who follows the legal industry and likes to improve related articles, I would like to work on the last draft of this article and improve it with third-party content. This firm is well known in the midwestern United States and has appeared in some industry news, e.g.  and  (just from one source that I regularly follow). —Sekicho (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * You're the AFD closer. Any objection to restoring this to draft space for improvement? ~Anachronist (talk) 17:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Undeleted and draftified to User:Sekicho/Husch Blackwell as a contested soft deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, see above. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:20, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

User:Kierancox04
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Kierancox04 (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. All you had on there was an advertisement for your YouTube channel, and it was correctly deleted per WP:NOTWEBHOST. That isn't what user pages are for. See User pages and you're free to create a new page that conforms to Wikipedia policies. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Cashaa
''I, Zacktera, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Zacktera (talk) 02:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Yemenite Jewish etiquette
I wish that the article be restored as a draft, so that I can continue to work on its improvement, hopefully, making it fit for Mainspace —Davidbena (talk) 23:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, restored to Draft:Yemenite Jewish etiquette along with its talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks!!!Davidbena (talk) 06:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Sakshi Joshi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Manav2406 (talk) 10:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Victoria de Grazia
38.140.115.194 (talk) 14:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Jeakson Singh Thounaojam
He's part of Indian Arrows, which now play in I-League, which is top division and thus passes WP:NFOOTY. source. source —Coderzombie (talk) 11:51, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done by TonyBallioni.  Hut 8.5  18:37, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

User:JoeyPknowsalotaboutthat
Reviving the page of my uncles's account —2407:7000:817C:1730:5906:3419:91D1:F3D (talk) 05:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Your "uncle" has been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. I don't see why his account should have a user page.  Hut 8.5  18:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:John Baguley
''I, Steve Cullen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Steve Cullen (talk) 21:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I restored this before, but you did nothing to improve the page. What would you intend to do this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking at my submission. No work has been done on the article until now as I have been gathering further data to contribute towards notability. I didn't have the data before, hence why I haven't requested a restoration - the previous restoration was not at my request.I now have some more significant data on the subject that i hope will allow my article to meet the notability requirements. Regards, Steve
 * Thanks for your explanation.
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Southwell Company
''I, Beveritttx, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SouthwellCo 22:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beveritttx (talk • contribs) 22:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this page is a copyright violation. and possibly other sources.  Hut 8.5  16:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Surveying & Spatial Sciences Institute (SSSI)
''I, GFunvake, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' GFunvake (talk) 22:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  16:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Brad Smith
''I, GRuban, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' GRuban (talk) 01:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  16:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Duality (Set It Off album)
''I, Afallone18, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Afallone18 (talk) 03:07, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  16:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Narrows (band)
''I, Realronaldb, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Realronaldb (talk) 04:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  16:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Philip Goring
I questioned the deletion of the page but nobody (person who had proposed deletion) returned my correspondence. Philip died on the 9th November this year although we had not had chance to update his page —Ainsley Brown (talk) 15:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
 * @Ainsley Brown: I don't see where you participated in the AfD discussion. Also, just dying probably isn't enough to make the person notable. However, if it generated a significant amount of in-depth coverage in reliable sources, then we might need to look at whether he now meets WP:GNG. —C.Fred (talk) 16:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Affle India Pvt. Ltd.
''I, Aiosfeder, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Aiosfeder (talk) 08:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  16:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:CYBERBIT
LeeBraun (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done The language of this draft was very promotional, to the point where it would have qualified for deletion under WP:CSD independently of G13.  Hut 8.5  16:28, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ian Anand Forber-Pratt
Gretchennewby (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Spitshine Records
Spitshine Records, while small, was an important label in the queercore scene. Other small labels from that scene are documented on Wikipedia. See, for instance, Agitprop! Records and Outpunk. It is not clear under what criteria Spitshine should receive differential treatment other than, perhaps, the article being only a stub. —Mackaye (talk) 19:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Elvin polanco
Valid sources will be added
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Elvin Polanco, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)