Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 294

Phillip Stutts
There is no clear reason that this page was deleted. All text of the conversation regarding the article's deletion was based on political opinion about Phillip Stutts, and not the merits of the information provided in the article. The article was properly sourced and included no promotional material.

Here is a copy of what was originally taken off Wikipedia. We request the article be undeleted so that we may update it.

—Bassalid (talk) 20:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Now that I have just restored the AfD after it was blanked, I can see that the first two Delete arguments are not about politics but about whether or not he satisfies our basic notability guideline, and the one Keep argument relied on the sheer number of times he's been quoted by the press; quotables are not reliable sources in any sense of the word. Arguments that a subject's sourcing is not enough for the subject to satisfy that guideline (which details our core inclusion criteria) isn't "political opinion about" the subject, but more an indictment of how few news stories there are that are actually about the person specifically. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 20:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

The political opinion I refer to is that when in the discussion they refer to him as a "spinmaster" and show personal bias. My request is simple. Allow me to submit a draft of a new Phillip Stutts article that will satisfy the requirements of proving "notability" and will have plenty of outside sourcing. Bassalid (talk) 15:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * First answer the question: Who is "we"?
 * Second: "No clear reason"? Are you kidding? Did you even read the discussion at Articles for deletion/Phillip Stutts? Have you read Notability? If you did, you would realize that we keep or delete articles not based on "the merits of the information provided in the article" but on whether the subject of the article is notable by virtue of having received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * At the time the request was filed, the AfD had been blanked. I restored it shortly before replying to this. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 03:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

By "we" I only meant it as interested parties in Phillip Stutts. I did read the discussions and I do not believe they are relevant at this time due to their date. I have requested permission to submit a new draft for the article so that it is appropriately reflective of Phillip Stutts and can be reconsidered in the terms of "notability." Bassalid (talk) 15:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * With what you had before you don't have much. A large number of the links you provided are either inappropriate to cite (such as opinion pieces he himself has authored or interviews he has given), 404 out/are on dead domains, or are passing mentions that merely quote him. Wikipedia needs multiple third-party sources that talk about him specifically in some depth in order to satisfy the notability requirement. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 19:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

I am willing to submit a completely updated entry that will have plenty of third party sourcing. If you feel it still doesn't contain adequate sourcing, or the discussion still assesses that he is not what qualifies as "notable" then that's fine. I'd just like the opportunity to create a new article on Phillip Stutts.Bassalid (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Then go through the Article Wizard and create a draft. You don't need us restoring the old page to do that. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 00:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Six Degrees
''I, Bodb Derg, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bodb Derg (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please find some references Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

User:SteveStrummer/Sandbox6
Userpage previously deleted by my own (author) request via G7); now seeking restoration for further use. —SteveStrummer (talk) 03:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Localguide123 (talk) 06:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC) Sir I make an humble request that brij bhushan mani tripathi was an prominent and respectful politician he was mla from milkipur legislative assembly and there is a statue of him on the main market of that area which was inogranated by cabinet minister of India I beg to say that we should add an article about him because he was very honourable and he is dead now that people should know about carrer problems he faced to become a big politician this will give them motivation please you can also see the status on websites of his on http://wikimapia.org/10123110/Late-Brij-Bhushan-Mani-Tripathi-Smarak-in-Front-of-Primary-School
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Dr. Brij Bhushan Mani Tripathi Wikimapia is not a reliable source. Please find some newspapers. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

M. J. Kang
She is an awarding winning playwright and actor with 8 produced plays. She is listed in Canadian Whos Who since 1990's. She has been nominated for a DORA Award for best new play, Noran Bang: The Yellow Room. She was also a series regular on Riverdale. She played Becky Snow and has worked with three academy award winning actors: Philip Seymour Hoffman, Timothy Hoffman, and Ellen Burstyn. She has acted on stage in New York, Toronto, London, Los Angeles, Winnipeg, Montreal, among many other cities. She is married to Oren Safdie. Together, they have a daughter, Mia.

https://library.ryerson.ca/asianheritage/authors/kang/ http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0437632/bio https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1235057.M_J_Kang

—2606:6000:6014:A200:208E:406D:5333:9ADD (talk) 16:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. —C.Fred (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sylvia Schwenk (2)
''I, Barrytevans, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Barrytevans (talk) 11:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You were told above that this isn't going to happen because it's a copyright violation. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 11:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this page is a copyright violation. @Barrytevans: If you intend to work on it, you have to start from scratch; you can't get back what had already been contributed because of the copyright violations. —C.Fred (talk) 16:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Michael Holyk
Royroyson44 (talk) 12:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 17:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Wong Seng Weng
We would like to retrieve the articles so that we can make the necessary amendments and upload it again. —Flowerwild399 (talk) 08:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * What is your connection, if any, with the article subject? feminist (talk) 08:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Administrator comment: Who is this "we" you are referring to? And no, we cannot restore it, because it was deleted as the result of Articles for deletion/Wong Seng Weng. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Sanam Teri Kasam
Requesting undeletion per WP:CSDRFU. I would like to take a look at the content of the disambiguation page before it was deleted, so that I can decide whether Sanam Teri Kasam (1982 film) needs to be moved back to the base title or not. —feminist (talk) 08:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅. This seems to be a valid and necessary disambiguation page, so I have restored it. Sometimes G5 deletions make no sense, in my opinion. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

sam alhaje
Hi wikipedia community, in the concern regarding the deletion of the Australian Actor's page Sam Alhaje. I honestly think (along with evidence below from his agent) that an administrator has erred in deleting the page Sam Alhaje due to the fact that he has acquired and has been cast in 3 new television shows and series airing in 2018 in which he is the main character "KARIM" in one (concern for welfare which is airing on SBS in Australia) A role on the ABC TV tv series RAKE as a supporting actor "DELL" to prestigious actor richard roxburgh and Damien Harvey, Another ABC TV brand new comedy as another supporting actor "JAL" in the upcoming show SANDO.( source is his very own agent Catherine Poulton. link is http://www.cpmgt.com.au/talent/sam-alhaje/. And has also been on hold for a third session of the successful show that branched him out "here come the habibs". He has also received recognition with the sci fi feature film "hidden peaks" which has just been sold and began distribution in USA,ASIA & Australia with a release date in the first quarter of 2018. he also has just been cast in the new theatre play as the main character for the Parramatta riverside theatre play called "Lakemba". He has also just finalised a commercial where he worked with the fabulous Australian legend Roy Billing for the prestigious bank "Macquarie Bank Group". Sam Alhaje has been covered thoroughly through his career so much so that he has been featured on various TV shows such as The Today Show, Today extra, 20 to one, the footy show" Print magazines such as TV week, Woman's day, Online with Daily mail, News papers such as Daily telegraph as well as radio interviews and catch ups with sam alhaje on radio stations 96.1 edge FM, power FM, 104.5 FM, and 106.5 Kis FM which is the biggest in the country, along with various and constant red carpet invites as one of the special guest stars which is evident through his social handle on instagram https://www.instagram.com/samalhaje/ . Not only has he been covered thoroughly publicly by the media, his 3 television shows, International feature film release, International Commercial he has just filmed for Macquarie group, and his Theatre casting for "Lakemba" all show that he is clearly a well established and loved celebrity and is only growing a even bigger traction and following. And with his new roles, he will also be further covered publicly even more. People know this guy, he is a established figure and he was even a candidate for a Logie. http://www.cpmgt.com.au/talent/sam-alhaje/
 * We don't cite the subject's agent or any other proxy, we don't cite social media, and being nominated or an award once isnn't enough to satisfy WP:Notability (people). The sources need to be there first, especially for biographies. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 19:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
 * you prodded this. You might want to take this to AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Retail meltdown
''I, UnitedStatesian, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:National Venture Capital Association
''I, UnitedStatesian, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Eugene A. Woynoski
Stevepolar (talk) 04:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Vee Fishnets
''I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:KSL Classifieds
''I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Peter Rawlinson
''I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Why are you asking for so many drafts written by others? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Hardcore of Sergeants
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Rasal Lia (talk) 14:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Hardcore of Sergeants was a guerrilla force formed with some children aged maximum twelve years old and worked in Sector- 9 during the liberation war of Bangladesh in 1971.


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I have restored Hard Core Sergeants and not Heardcore of Sergeants which doesn't exist (it existed with a capital 'Of' but that one is ineligible for restoration). ~Anachronist (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * But now we must ask user:Amortias why it was deleted with G4, and what deletion discussion is applicable? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd need to check to see what I viewed around that time to have confirmed it met G4. I'm unlikely to be able to do that for a couple of days and am loathed to try to use the tools from a smartphone so if anyone wants to restore it till I can find what I'm after that would seem best. Amortias (T)(C) 06:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I have restored it so that anyone can check if g4 applies or not. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:03, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It is now at Articles for deletion/Hard Core Sergeants if anyone has an opinion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:21
Doesn't count as "housekeeping". —Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually the page is now at Draft:9 + 10 = 21, and the deleted bit was just a redirect, so no loss. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * In retrospect, the redirect doesn't seem worth it. Thanks for the help though! - Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Amigurumi
''I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Just start this one over again if you want, the entire content was "Gather yarn and needle" not even enough to copyright or tell what this is about. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Wait, that's what it was? I don't need it back, it's just some draft I came across one day. Thanks though. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to New York (2018 film)
The article was recreated, thereby effectively challenging the prod. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 06:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done history restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Velibre GmbH
Velibre is at the forefront of a dynamic change in the coffee capsule industry. This industry creates 75 000 tonnes of waste each year in plastic and aluminium. Velibre has created a paper capsule which is of enormous public interest and of enormous interest to the environment —Velibre (talk) 11:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * None of what you wrote has anything to do with notability as Wikipedia defines it for companies. See WP:CORP. Therefore...
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Velibre GmbH, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:John conti Coffee Company
''I, Ost316, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ost (talk) 15:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I found some sources that I believe should flesh it out. —Ost (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  18:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Cody Longo
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Stephnicolelongo (talk) 18:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Information and original page on American actor and musician needs to be restored!

When you type in “Cody Longo” it re directs to “Hollywood heights” which is not current. Cody Longo needs a page for his name...not his show.

There was previously a whole page on this celebrity but it was either removed or deleted.

Please restore page. Thanks!
 * The page was deleted almost 3 years ago for lack of coverage in reliable sources. Has that changed since then? Perhaps creating a draft (like at Draft:Cody Longo) would be a start. -- ‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town  ‖ 19:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with Ebyabe – if this is undeleted, it should be placed in WP:Draftspace until it can be appraised to see if it currently meets our WP:Notability (people) guidelines... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

PH wikidata/settlement_type
I started the subpage just yesterday. I haven't it yet right to become live. —Kangaroo caught (talk) 00:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, template restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Spark FM Logo 2015.png
File deleted under F5 (unused file), Thanks, —– Davey 2010 Talk 01:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, file restored and put in the infobox in the Spark Sunderland article. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Michael Granville Hogg
''I, Richardswu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Richardswu (talk) 01:28, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  07:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Michaelelijahtanuwijaya
i'm still try to make a good edit for new user page for me.. cause i'm still newbie to make an user page.. wikipedia doesn't give me a time to try improve my edit on my user page.. i still confuse to make a new user page, cause you know i think too much tutorial to i read before make good edit for my user page.. until yesterday i never have deleted edits on English Wikipedia.. so now, i have 5 deleted edits.. it's make me little dissapointed.. —Michaelelijahtanuwijaya (talk) 10:00, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If the page above is the page you mean, then it was likely deleted because you blanked it, which makes administrators think you want it deleted. Thankfully G7s can be restored here on request. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 10:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done the page was deleted because you placed a template on the article (db-self) asking for it to be deleted. I've restored it for you.  Hut 8.5  21:00, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Asenath Bole Odaga
''I, FuniHistory, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' FuniHistory (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sunnie Giles
''I, Mohmentum, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mohmentum (talk) 21:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:ANDERW CHEN XIAOXING
''I, Shkui, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Shkui (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  22:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_FX
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Mixahead (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

If more requested links are needed it can be provided

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_FX


 * Yes check.svg Done as a contested soft deletion the article has been restored on request. I suggest you improve the article to address the concerns in the deletion nomination, otherwise it may be deleted again. Also ping User:Duffbeerforme as the AfD nominator.  Hut 8.5  22:32, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Online Education Services - OES
220.101.38.65 (talk) 23:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Shelley Goodstein
Kpounds (talk) 02:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jose Raymond
This draft was deleted based on G4 on Articles for deletion/Jose Raymond (2nd nomination), but these are two different people with the same name. The person in the draft does not appear to be notable, but that is a reason to decline the draft, not to delete the draft. Please restore the draft into draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC) —Robert McClenon (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Given that this was deleted under G4 you'll need to contact the deleting admin or use deletion review. While the draft was about a different person to the one deleted in the second AfD (the one you linked to) it was the same person as the article deleted in the first AfD and the text appears to be the same. Deleting drafts of articles deleted in mainspace under G4 is a little dubious though and you may be able to get it restored.  Hut 8.5  21:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ✔️ by :RHaworth. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Interesting. So the first deleted person was the same.  Okay.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Radmin
The page exists on other languages (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAdmin, https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Administrator, https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radmin) and was speedy deleted because the content was advertorial. I can rewrite the article in accordance with Wikipedia rules. The page was about Radmin remote control software - the project is being developing and has milions users wordwide. The official website: www.radmin.com. I can verify the content with independant product reviews, ratings and make it encyclopedic and neutral. —Happywren 18:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I suggest you contact the deleting admin (User:Jo-Jo Eumerus) - they may be willing to restore the article to draft space for you to improve it.  Hut 8.5  22:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * That was already asked for. I personally think that rewriting it from scratch may be more appropriate in this case. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Bristol porcelain (1770-1781)
''I, Nickpanes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Nickpanes (talk) 12:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 15:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Redmon Group
''I, Redglenn, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Redglenn (talk) 15:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

We Leak Info
The original author has disowned this page and I wish to continue its creation. —Databreaches (talk) 16:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Since the person who deleted the article has stated that his account was hacked and someone else created it under his name, I'm pinging him here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  17:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * My guess is that the user who wishes to "continue" this article is the same person who hacked my account to create it in the first place. There is probably some motive inspiring this person other than improving the encyclopedia. What reason would someone have to hack the account of someone like me, who has been an editor for just over 10 years, other than hoping that the article might somehow be subject to less scrutiny? In my opinion, any user that expresses a desire to re-create this article or make any of the edits that the hacker made in my name should be immediately blocked. I had to suffer such inconvenience and indignity. So, let such person prove that their intentions in making contributions here are noble. Taxman1913 (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The only contribution has made to the entire encyclopedia is the above request for undeletion. S/he has the audacity to say that the "original author" has disowned the page. You, Databreaches, are the original author. Why don't you own up to what you did? Do you really expect people to believe that you suddenly created an account, and the first thing you noticed was a deleted article, and you innocently wish to continue its creation? You must think that the people here cannot put 2 and 2 together. I know that my tone departs from the decorum that is appropriate for Wikipedia, but you wasted my time yesterday, you wasted the time of  yesterday, and now you're wasting the time of more people. If you want to promote a commercial product, find another way. Wikipedia is not the place for that. Taxman1913 (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Databreaches has been blocked as the likely perpetrator of the account breach. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Dr. Igal Elyassi
117.198.57.210 (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Dr._Igal_Elyassi&diff=611449013&oldid=prev


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Anarkali Marikar, click from movie Vimaanam, December 2017.jpg
Could you undelete this image file so that it can be used in the article Anarkali Marikar as a photograph. Thank you. —Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done using the image for that purpose wouldn't be compliant with the non-free content criteria, in particular the image is replaceable by a free alternative.  Hut 8.5  21:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Velayutham poster.jpg
This poster was legitimately uploaded by me, complying with Template:Infobox film, but was deleted without my notice when another user (now inactive) replaced it with his own preferred poster. —-- Kailash29792 (talk)  04:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please add this to an article or it'll be deleted again at some point.  Hut 8.5  21:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

User:CJ Rider/sandbox‬
Cj rider (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this page is a copyright violation. Most of it is taken from the subject's LinkedIn profile.  Hut 8.5  21:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Sync.com
I would like the chance to improve the sources on this article as per WP:ORGDEPTH. Thanks! —AllenAdam76 (talk) 17:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

1 -3
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Joachim 08:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC) To get back to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joachim Oforchukwu (talk • contribs) 08:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


 * @Joachim Oforchukwu: I don't see a page by that name in Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The deleted piece of work the requester wrote was an essay about leadership in the Nigerian church and starts with a quote from Matthew 20, 24-27. It was in User:Joachim Oforchukwu/sandbox. So User:Joachim Oforchukwu, is that what you are asking about? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Away Resorts
''I, Jmbroomie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jmbroomie (talk) 10:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Since User talk:DGG deleted this as advertising, you should ask him if he is willing to restore the draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Emeka Odidika E
''I, Mekasnoop4u, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mekasnoop4u (talk) 11:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Although it was deleted under WP:G13, this was equally a candidate for WP:G11. You may not use Wikipedia as a tool to write about yourself; we are not Facebook. If you have no interest in building an encyclopedia, but instead simply wish to add promotional material about yourself, please go elsewhere. Yunshui <sup style="font-size:90%">雲 <sub style="font-size:90%">水 12:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Roxanne O'Connell
''I, Roxanneoconnell, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Roxanneoconnell (talk) 18:49, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:YesReneau
''I, L8 ManeValidus, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' L8 ManeValidus (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 02:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:ThreatModeler
''I, Bbeyst, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bbeyst (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:International Younger Chemists Network
''I, Sophie.paris, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Sophie.paris (talk) 08:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

raja sikandar sultan
I belive that the article was deleted in a haphazard way without giving due consideration to the merits of the article. The page on Sikandar Sultan Raja should be added back as he is a federal secretary to the government of Pakistan equivalent to the secretary of any department in the USA or a permanent secretary to a particular department in the UK. If for example, they have their Wikipedia pages up then why delete Mr. Sultans? 5-6 federal secretaries pages are up from Pakistan, for example, Fawad Hassan Fawad, Rizwan Memon. Why is it that he was only singled out and deleted without giving through the process or the administrator himself seeing the merits of the article and importance on the site. This site is made to educate and help people in research and deleting such pages hinders the peoples right to information. It is clearly seen that some malafidey has happened to remove this page in a hurry by the person who nominated its deletion without citing proper reasons and even if this page remained up no harm was being done. So it is kindly requested to put it back up — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.42.10.173 (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done see Raja Sikandar Sultan. The deletion was accorded due process with a discussion page here: Articles for deletion/Raja Sikandar Sultan. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Giuseppe_Ragona
''I, Hjuma, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Hjuma (talk) 13:30, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

User:SteveStrummer/Sandbox7
Userpage previously deleted by my own (author) request via G7); now seeking restoration for further use —SteveStrummer (talk) 23:37, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, page restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Nikhil chandwani
Dear Admins Nikhil_chandwani article was deleted previously because of unreliable sources but now it has reliable references and fulfill Wikipedia criteria kindly review the article references and take a positive action (undeletion) as per Wikipedia guidelines —Truembp (talk) (talk) 11:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done this process is only for requesting the restoration of uncontroversial deletions, which doesn't include this article. I suggest you ask the deleting admin (most recently User:Shirt58) and go to deletion review if you aren't satisfied.  Hut 8.5  11:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Erukala
Unclear why Anomiebot deleted it in the first place. —– Uanfala (talk) 01:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It was meant to be a redirect to Yerukala people; instead it redirected to the redirect Yerukala. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  03:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * So it was deleted because of being a double redirect then? The solution I'd expect to such a problem would be simply repointing it to the ultimate target. Is there any particular benefit in deletion? – Uanfala (talk) 03:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The page Yerukala people did not exist at the time it was deleted, as the page was deleted the previous day. You can recreate the redirect now if you wish. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, so that's why! Mystery solved now, thanks! Adding ✅ in case this is needed for marking the thread ready for archiving. – Uanfala (talk) 16:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Kiranraj K
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —117.249.211.204 (talk) 13:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done this page was deleted through a deletion discussion and isn't eligible for restoration through this process. Deletion review is the correct venue.  Hut 8.5  19:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Chase McMorrough
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —67.8.114.161 (talk) 14:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  19:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Charles Robertson Grant Deed
''I, Bertmbc, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bertmbc (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  19:05, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Kannan
Kannan is a Tamil name and the article was a WP:DAB, as shown by this archive. It was recently speedily deleted by as a WP:A7. I can't tell what happened to the article to warrant speedy deletion but I guess an editor turned the dab page into a biographical article. Can the article be undeleted and restored to a version when it was a dab page? —Obi2canibe (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done restored Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Antoine Blondeau
''I, Bbarmadillo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:38, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * thanks. This wasn't my draft. But thank you for the instruction anyway. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 06:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Adult Learning Australia
''I, Lifelonglearning1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Lifelonglearning1 (talk) 06:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Since your user name matches an organisation, I recommend you request a name that represents a person at WP:CHU. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Andrew (Yaun-DU) Yang
''I, Atmyseria, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Atmyseria (talk) 07:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Comparison of VPN providers
''I, Suncatcher 13, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Suncatcher (talk) 09:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * This was restored about 7 months ago with no improvements made. What do you plan to do this time if it is restored? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kekcroc
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —50.71.242.136 (talk) 03:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC) i wanna find out if its real
 * See Articles for deletion/Kekcroc, the game was probably a hoax, and not a very notable one. Not only that you will see a much better story here: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/kekcroc. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:52, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * There is a copy of the article here for you to see what it was like: http://deletedwiki.com/index.php?title=Kekcroc Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sky Thieves
Dominika j (talk) 11:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Dan Walker (Author)
Dominika j (talk) 11:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

List of Singapore MRT disruptions
Hello, the article "List of Singapore MRT disruptions ", previously at the URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Singapore_MRT_disruptions, has been deleted. It states "The article that you're looking for doesn't exist." The page's history only goes up to end Nov 2017, so I can't view the reason for deletion. The article is about an important event in Singaporean history, the city-state's 6 year long spell of rapid transit disruptions and related technical faults. —Qwspasot (talk) 13:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/List of Singapore MRT disruptions, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)