Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 295

Draft:Nippon Bearing Co. Ltd.
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Marvinwest (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Rajiv Jain (Indian Cinematographer)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —AP 14:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Found out some good referencesAP 14:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Stuart Patterson
''I, GaiBenHinom, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' GaiBenHinom (talk) 21:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

I was delayed in reediting the page. Will come back to it soon —GaiBenHinom (talk) 21:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Clifton Hill Community Music Centre
This collective was an important part of Melbourne and Australian post punk, experimental and electronic music history. It's mentioned in books and web page histories of this period. I didn't notice it had been deleted until I tried to link it from other artist pages. thanks —Kathodonnell (talk) 02:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Clifton Hill Community Music Centre, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. If you have more references, you may be able to get this back as a draft if you ask Mark Arsten. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ok, thanks for this. I'll check with Mark Arsten. cheers Kathodonnell (talk) 04:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Arctic Zero
Please recover this page to my Userspace or as a Draft, I intend to work on it and submit properly through the AfC process —Bbarmadillo (talk) 12:04, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You had better talk to the deleter user talk:Bilby about this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * thanks. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 04:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Amaëlle
''I, Amaëlle, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Amaëlle (talk) 15:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Amaëlle Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Abe Issa
Page deletion did not go through proper discussion —Vinny009 (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ✔️ restored by RickinBaltimore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:National Association of State Chief Information Officers
''I, Danielledoak, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Danielledoak (talk) 20:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . You will need more references to get this live. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Gudinva Saloh
Unaware as to why this page was deleted in the first place. Gudinva is a prominent (at least within the country) Burkinabe figure. —82.41.102.125 (talk) 20:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Why this is not a hoax will need to be addressed though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * FYI, I've nominated the article for deletion at Articles for deletion/Gudinva Saloh. --Finngall talk  21:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Jacob_Teitelbaum
Cannot fathom Dr. Jacob Teitelbaum's Wiki bio being deleted. He is a popular speaker at medical conferences and a leader in numerous fields, including CFS, fibromyalgia, and autism. He is the author of many books, among them the best seller 'From Fatigued to Fantastic', considered the Bible of chronic fatigue syndrome. Could go on, but to keep it short: please restore his page, as deleting it from Wikipedia is silliness. Thank you. —ForeverBeach (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. you may wish to be aware of this restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notification. I'm now retired from WP, so I'll leave it to others to decide. My objections to the article in its last-known state are noted on the talk page, the main one being a very obvious SPIP issue. – Robin Hood  (talk)  00:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Nate 2169/common.js
I would like to do things that have to do with stuff relating to JavaScript on this subpage. —Nate 2169 (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, page restored, and blanked to prevent further deletion. You could have just re-created it yourself, though, because there was only one line in the history. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:26, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Bakhtawar Bhutto Zardari
Because the content was not sufficient earlier I would like to put it properly in place and request not only undeletions but protection as well allowing a select few users to build up the content - in the event that a mere tweet by this 'non-notable' can affect the outcome of elections in constituencies I would like to consider the said person as pretty notable Nukout (talk) 06:42, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

It was nominated for deletion by a user who sympathizes with an opposing political party and that user created a page for a member of the said party which was deleted - the page itself was not well maintained HOWEVER notability largely may be ascertained by a mere google search in the news and specific events and contributions to society by the individual mentioned across media such as The Scotsman, BBC, Newsweek and other publications internationally as well as published books (ISBN - 978-1-4331-0336-0) —Nukout (talk) 06:42, 7 February 2018 (UTC) .


 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Bakhtawar Bhutto Zardari, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I should note that that region of the world generally has a fundamental misunderstanding of what Wikipedia actually is, as demonstrated by the Express Tribune characterising Wikipedia articles as "profiles" as if it were a social media site. The article also makes a couple other critical researching errors, stating that a subject needed "primary and secondary sources" (primary sources do not count for notability, and this is actually acknowledged earlier in same article), seems utterly mystified about the WP:Articles for deletion process (it claims Aseefa Bhutto Zardari was reinstated after a second AfD nomination, when the actual AfD closed as "delete and redirect", and characterises the rather civil discussion as "heated") and states the PPP has an "official" page (they don't.) —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 08:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:WegenerNet
''I, WEGC1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' WEGC1 (talk) 09:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Don't paste content from other websites into articles here! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Bishwo Gautam
please undelete this.files I will edit and make it comply with wikipedia rules., I researched and wrote this articleis taking 9 hours today and found out that there was another one which was delete few days ago.please let meme edit it please. I have put too much effort in it —Ktmstreetrider (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 21:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

List of occupations
Lists of occupations —5.41.6.96 (talk) 11:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The deleted contributions will not be restored because this page will not restore content deleted via deletion debate, and DRV endorsed the deletion when the debate was challenged. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 21:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

List of jobs
Lists of occupations —5.41.6.96 (talk) 11:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a G8 deletion, since it's removing a redirect to a empty page post-AfD. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 21:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Hamblema/sandbox
I am trying to get the content back I created to see if it is worth editing further. Thanks for any assistance. Hamblema (talk) 19:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, sandbox restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Miss_Progress_International
''I, Joeitalia, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gibi 16:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

I haven't been able to watch alerts —Gibi 16:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It isn't deleted, but I restored the contribution history. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Barbara Smith Wynne
99.203.142.225 (talk) 20:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Do not copy material from other websites to this page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Rabah Benlarbi
the page I created (Rabah Benlarbi) meets the criteria by coaching a Burmese club (Zwekapin United FC) and being part of the staff for other fully pro teams see (WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues) and I was definitely not creating it for advertising purposes. Das osmnezz (talk) 05:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC) —Das osmnezz (talk) 22:38, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ✔️ by Fastily. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Supreme Sundar
''I, Vikash rajendran, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Vikash rajendran (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Venn Digital
''I, Gript0n, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gript0n (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:DJ M.O.S.
''I, Jcoren, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jcoren (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

DJ M.O.S.
I would like to keep editing the draft of this page to further verify that the page should be reinstated —Jcoren (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * See above for draft restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Skidmore Group
I would like the article I created Skidmore Group to be restored. It was deleted moments after I created it under G11 criteria, although the article was written in a very neutral tone and it was deleted without discussion. I would like the article to at least be restored in draft form so that I can work on it some more. Thanks :) Jessymacdonald (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You should be asking the user that deleted it without tagging: user talk:Yunshui. Perhaps it can be returned as a draft. The fact that it was declined 3 times at AFC for advertising should have given you a clue that it may not have been suitable for an article yet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Manolis (Emmanuel Aligizakis)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Μανώλης Αλυγιζάκης (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC) I don't understand why you deleted my profile. I'm the person in the profile and all material in the profile are true. How can I prove this to you, so you can restore my page? I also tried to open a new account and so far you haven't approved it. What do others do to establish a profile wit Wikipedia?

Emmanuel Aligizakis (legal name), Manolis (pen name)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. The page was deleted because it was copied from http://memberservices.membee.com/feeds/directory/directory.aspx?action=Listing&value=295&cid=1043&did=100
 * We don't host material already published elsewhere. This is a copyright violation. Even if you have permission to reproduce it, Wikipedia doesn't have permission, and we don't rely on the word of random Wikipedia accounts for such permission.
 * Whether it is "true" or not is irrelevant. If you don't meet our inclusion criteria as spelled out in Notability and particularly Notability (people), you cannot have an article here.
 * Furthermore don't write about yourself on Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't place to "establish a profile". This is an encyclopedia of human knowledge. If you want a profile page, go to a social media site such as Facebook. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Patrick Rump
I wish this article to be restored. This is work in progress and there will be more content on notability (will improve reliability also). I should be profoundly grateful if you could kindly restore this article and let me continue working on this.

129.78.56.202 (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Patrick Rump Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

A Lexia Nicole's Show
Because i would like to continue to edit it —EdwardJeromeButler (talk) 07:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:A_Lexia_Nicole's_Show Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Rahul_Verma_(social_activist)
HelloDolly89 (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC) New York times recently did a front page story on him, in this article it is clearly visible that he remain media shy for so many years. His work is praised not only in India but around the world. http://www.nytimes.com/images/2017/12/29/nytfrontpage/INYT_frontpage_global.20171229.pdf

One Man’s Stand Against Junk Food as Diabetes Climbs Across India ( online addition) https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/26/health/india-diabetes-junk-food.html Same article was featured as a two page article in printed addition of Gulf times http://gulfnews.com/culture/people/a-father-sues-to-curb-junk-food-as-diabetes-spreads-1.2150937 Here is video featured about his work by CNBC TV 18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZYVav8_r2o —HelloDolly89 (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Rahul Verma (social activist), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. It is probably OK to have information about this person in this article: Uday Foundation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Arun Ravi
no deletion —Arun Ravi (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ❌ Note that Arun is not deleted or planned for deletion. Also Arun Ravi was blanked by you. But there was no claim of importance before being blanked. There is very similar content in User:Arun Ravi/sandbox, so you do not need the content back.  Please read WP:Autobiography. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Bubble
''I, Markillman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Markillman (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator . Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 18:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC). Thanks for the response Jeremy</i>. I appreciate the clarification, but would also add that it's not my intent to create any kind of spammy page. Wikipedia has the most comprehensive listing of Project management in existence and it feels very much like a chicken and egg situation with regards to joining the list. I will do as you suggest however, and pick up directly with the deleting author. Markillman

Draft:Military Foundation Day
''I, Finnusertop, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Tres Mares
''I, Docreynolds, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Docreynolds (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Gisele Afeche
{{subst:refund|1= Gisele Afeche|2= I deleted it by mistake and need it back please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giseleafeche (talk • contribs) 19:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says {{button|Submit your draft for review!}}. see Draft:Gisele Afeche, as for your userpage it never had anything on it, and you can create that again if you wish. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Dylan Hartigan
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —74.105.125.247 (talk) 23:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Dylan Hartigan, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

The Student Life
Article was deleted as non-notable with minimal discussion and merged into Pomona College. However, article is notable in that TSL is the oldest student newspaper in Southern California; student newspapers of similar reputation (age, awards, student body size served) most often have Wikipedia pages. In any case, merging into Pomona College was an inappropriate resolution, as TSL serves all five Claremont Colleges with no special emphasis on Pomona. —Sdkb (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It isn't deleted, and never was, it was just redirected. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The redirect took out 90% of the content on the page, so it may as well have been deleted. As I alluded to above, very few people participated in the discussion about the deletion, and the few who did were clearly not familiar with the subject and thus erred in their decision. If this isn't it, where would be the appropriate forum to challenge the decision? - Sdkb (talk) 01:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No, it did not - the edits remain in the history of that page (see here). Deletion wipes out the history. —<i style="color: #228B22;">Jeremy</i> v^_^v  Bori! 02:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Robotics Creation Matters
''I, Yanyan.ding, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Yanyan.ding (talk) 06:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —<i style="color: #228B22;">Jeremy</i> v^_^v  Bori! 06:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * For these it is best for the potential restorer to look to see if the page was truly abandoned after its prior restoration. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

User:BrySchec
Would like to bring back profile —BrySchec (talk) 15:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You didn't have anything there, just one line: "I am just getting the hang of this website. I probably won't edit often, but when I do I'll try my best." Feel free to start over, keeping in mind the Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service and that User pages can be used only for specific purposes. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Dictionary Rally
''I, Capek, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Capek (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:50, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Popovy Sisters
Most of the article is legit, only few sentences must be fixed, there are a lot of reliable sources/ publication and I will be adding more —Julia mji (talk) 06:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this page is a copyright violation. Material was copied from http://popovy-dolls.com/exhibition/ - please start over from scratch. As a paid editor, you must refrain from making any substantive changes in main article space. Therefore, start over in draft space (e.g. Draft:Popovy Sisters), and submit your draft for review via Articles for creation. That is really the only venue available on Wikipedia for editors with a conflict of interest to create articles here. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Update: I see you already had a draft version, which was deleted. I have restored it: Draft:Popovy Sisters. Please work on that and submit it for review. Do not move it to main space yourself. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Nial Family
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —157.41.250.103 (talk) 09:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Just start again from scratch. The entire content was "family". If you are going to take a while, I suggest that you write at Draft:Nial Family. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Chris Devins
The reasoning given for the p0ages deletion is incorrect. The subject is quite notable, with many examples of positive press. The negative press came from a misunderstanding of the media that the Artist is a Placemaker who often uses curated found images in his work. In the negative press tha5 occurred, members of the media ran with a misquote by DNA Info and failed to look at any of his other work to provide context. DNA Info was facing dissolution and played the scandal quality of the story for increased visits to its page. The other media outlets ran with the story without thorough facts checks. The mural in dispute was successfully installed and still exists to this day. No lawsuit was filed, etc}

Positive press to prove notability

“Brand Building”	2/19/14	Southside Weekly: Harrison Smith	Feature Story	Chris Devins and Bronzeville Legends Initiative	http://southsideweekly.com/brand-building/ DNA Info 	4/17/2015	DNA Info 	Feature Story	Mahalia Jackson	http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150417/chatham/whose-face-is-that-on-building-on-81st-street-chatham DNA Info	6/7/2014	DNA Info	Feature Story	Travis Beautification Project	http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20140607/chatham/chatham-beautification-project-seeks-boost-investment-pride DNA Info	8/12/2014	DNA Info	Feature Story	 Nat King Cole Mural	http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20140812/bronzeville/nat-king-cole-mural-part-of-mans-effort-boost-bronzevilles-image Pullman muse-um proposes mural that would make a statement 5/14/2015	Chicago Tribune	Feature Story	A Phillip Randolph Mural 	http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-pullman-museum-mural-met-20150513-story.html Gospel Queen grins on Chatham	6/4/2015	DNA Info	Feature Story	Mahalia Jackson Mural marks 1st public art initia-tive for Pullman monument 7/2/2015	Chicago Tribune	Feature Story	Pullman	http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-pullman-workers-mural-unveilling-met-20150702-story.html New mural un-veiled at Pull-man museum 7/6/2015	WGN	TV Clip	Pullman	http://wgntv.com/2015/07/06/new-mural-unveiled-at-pullman-museum/

Meet Chris Devins	7/10/2015	Hue Foreveryman HUE GENT feature	All	https://www.facebook.com/hue.foreveryman/posts/438129059700819 Chicago mural-ist focuses on everyday Hyde Park residents 8/17/2015	Chicago Tribune 	Feature pg 4 http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-hyde-park-murals-met-20150816-story.html Artist @LeagueOfExtra picks fresh faces for murals in Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood	8/17/2015	Tribune Reporter Tony Briscoe on Twitter	Tweet	Hyde Park Heroes	https://mobile.twitter.com/_TonyBriscoe/status/633277382992916484/photo/1

New project highlights the great and or-dinary Hyde Parker 8/19/2015	Hyde Park Herald	Feature	Hyde Park	http://hpherald.com/2015/08/19/new-project-highlights-the-great-and-ordinary-hyde-parker/ Artist/master Of Urban Planning Planting Iden-tity Affirming Murals On Chicago’s South Side 10/28/2015		Feature		http://www.boredpanda.com/artistmaster-of-urban-planning-planting-identity-affirming-murals-on-chicagos-south-side/

New Mariano's To Feature Pho-to Murals of Famous Bronzeville Residents 3/7/2016				https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20160307/bronzeville/new-marianos-feature-photo-murals-of-famous-bronzeville-residents

Imagery of Chance the Rapper and Common Boosts Chatham	4/11/2016	Columbia Chronicle	Article		http://www.columbiachronicle.com/arts_and_culture/article_757ce9ba-fe15-11e5-a6da-4720ffda921e.html

Chance the Rapper And Common Hon-ored With South-Side Chicago Murals 4/20/2016	All Hip Hop	Article		http://allhiphop.com/2016/04/20/chance-the-rapper-and-common-honored-with-south-side-chicago-murals/ Common and Chance the Rapper Honored With Murals in Chicago

4/22/2016	The Boombox	Article		http://theboombox.com/common-chance-the-rapper-honored-murals-chicago-murals/ Chance The Rapper & Common Hon-ored By Chica-go Murals 4/22/2016	Hip Hop DX	Article		http://hiphopdx.com/news/id.38443/title.chance-the-rapper-common-honored-by-chicago-murals Chance The Rapper & Common Hon-ored By Chica-go Murals 4/22/2016	Hip Hop Wired	Article		http://hiphopwired.com/2016/04/21/common-chance-the-rapper-part-chicago-art-project/

Metro Minutes	5/11/2016	Columbia Chronicle:	Video 		https://www.facebook.com/lauren.kostiuk/videos/1381595318533161/?fallback=1 Common Bond 	6/1/2016	Southside Weekly		Kezie Nwachukwu	http://southsideweekly.com/common-bond/

6/6/2016	Fox News			Contacted me

Chicagoan Brings Attention to South Side Through Art

8/18/2016	Fox News			http://www.fox32chicago.com/news/193652880-video  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32kTu8FlIBw&t=10s ——C.Fred (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheLetterist (talk • contribs) 22:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.  Hut 8.5  22:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Albert A. Sicroff
''I, Hortonio, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Hortonio (talk) 23:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: . @Hortonio: Have at it. —C.Fred (talk) 02:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Pulse Microsystems
Page was deleted for "marketing", but I would like to get the draft back to post for others to help review, and to fix so I dont need to start over. —Csgoldberg (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, no. First, you haven't complied with WP:PAID as requested on your talk page, as you agreed to do when you created your account. Second, articles deleted as WP:G11 are ineligible for restoration by request here. You can ask the deleting administrator to consider restoring the draft; otherwise you will need to start over. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Anachronist he is the one who told me to try here! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csgoldberg (talk • contribs) 16:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No, he didn't. He offered to email the source to you. And you still haven't complied with WP:PAID or disclosed your conflict of interest. Sorry, but there's no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring a spam draft, or to cater to editors who can't or won't follow our policies. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

I have tried to do this, I am not deliberately disobeying policies, I just find it difficult to use. You cannot fault me for being a first time contributor, trying to navigate everything and receiving zero help... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csgoldberg (talk • contribs) 17:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Also - I cant declare any connection if a dont have a draft to use...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csgoldberg (talk • contribs) 17:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Will continue on your talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

DR. SYED MUHAMMAD ZAFAR IQBAL
110.37.209.10 (talk) 07:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

DR. SYED MUHAMMAD ZAFAR IQBAL He is currently working as assistant professor at Khwaja fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar khan Pakistan was registered as a Ph.D. student on 09.12.1999 in the department of physics, The Islamia University Bahawalpur, Pakistan. He started research on the topic entitled as “Solar Radiation Assisted processing of Advanced Materials” which was approved by the academic council of the university.
 * Wall of text removed. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.37.209.10 (talk • contribs) 07:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * . There is no deleted article by that name in draft space or main space, uppercase or lowercase. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm going to guess he wrote the article here, thinking it was a place to ask it be written. —<i style="color: #228B22;">Jeremy</i> v^_^v  Bori! 20:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

User:SteveStrummer/Sandbox8
Userpage previously deleted by my own (author) request via G7); now seeking restoration for further use. —SteveStrummer (talk) 00:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done  Hut 8.5  18:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

sandbox
''I, Cj rider, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Cj rider (talk) 10:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do. Your sandbox isn't deleted, and the article called sandbox isn't either. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Also X mark.svg Not done, assuming that this relates to the deleted version of User:CJ Rider/sandbox - large portions of it are a copyright violation of the subject's LinkedIn page .  Hut 8.5  18:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Imosley/sandbox
Need to get the text that I had and was unaware of the sandbox policies and did not mean to publish. I will delete as soon as I have copied the text to a word file. Thank you! —Imosley (talk) 16:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I have sent you the text by email.  Hut 8.5  19:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Emilian Vettath
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2405:204:D10E:E05:2507:481B:7196:5EE (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The article had no content at all, just an infobox. Because it is not ready for main space, I have restored it to Draft:Emilian Vettath. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Full Service
''I, PanagiotisZois, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Barts
''I, Bart in de encyclopedie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Bart in de encyclopedie (talk) 14:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Outdoorphoto
I wish to update the article as suggested. Need the original information as foundation to work from —AnnaODP (talk) 14:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Nemra (band)
The article is notable according to this 2 points Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network. —Dreamer14513181 (talk) 21:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Nemra (band), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.  Hut 8.5  21:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Um, it looks like the requester moved the article to draft (which was the AFD outcome) and then moved back today. It never actually got deleted. So I'm not sure what the requester wants here. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * still exists. – Athaenara ✉  00:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * That's because it was moved back a few minutes ago, and the main space title has been protected. Which, I think is the best outcome. The draft wasn't ready for main space, IMO. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Understood. – Athaenara  ✉  00:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arquivo.pt:_the_Portuguese_web-archive
"The content was original, there were only a few words repeated from the original site (Arquivo.pt), which I obviously can replace by synonyms. I answered on the talk page and the page was deleted with no further explanation. If Wikipedia still decides that the content should not be published please send me the deleted text so that I can publish it elsewhere. It didn't not cross my mind that the article would be deleted, so I didn't make copy of the text. Thank you for your attention. /Daniel Gomes, Manager of Arquivo.pt" —Dcgomes77 (talk) 10:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You should be asking the deleting administrator: user talk:RHaworth who may be able to examine the extent of copying or email you a copy. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Nintex
''I, 38.140.5.242, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 38.140.5.242 (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Alison Denham
''I, Soldenh, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Soldenh (talk) 20:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . You will also need sources independent of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Arrouche Lakhdar
(no text provided) Arrouche Lakhdar (talk) 21:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. And, at the moment, it is unsuitable. Wikipedia isn't a placed to host CVs or "profiles". This is an encyclopedia of human knowledge.
 * Also, you really, really need to read Autobiography. In a nutshell: don't write about yourself on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Andhra Pradesh Special Category Status
''I, 96.95.119.150, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 96.95.119.150 (talk) 22:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)