Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 298

Draft:Ablative analysis
''I, John hanley parc, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' John hanley parc (talk) 12:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

John hanley parc (talk) 12:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also note the talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

René Fris
Reason for deletion stated ambiguous advertising, G11? I hope to fix it so it falls in line with the rules. —Xeion (talk) 02:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. —C.Fred (talk) 02:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Democratic Services
''I, TheGarratt, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' TheGarratt (talk) 23:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You asked for this before and I restored it, but you did nothing, so what do you intend to do this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:GKM variety (G2: Test page)
This was not a test page. As GKM variety currently does not exist, this draft page can be used to develop a mainspace article. —Taku (talk) 00:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The only content on the page was a citation to .  Hut 8.5  21:59, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

OK here was the content as written by the requestor: 
 * Was it? (I cannot remember but it was meant as a draft not an edit test.) If not much to ask, can you copy-paste the content here? For example, what was the link name for the page? (I just want to know what I had before so I can recreate it.) -- Taku (talk) 23:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * a GKM variety is

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:51, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Richard Paul Gonzales, GKM theory of rationally smooth group embeddings, 2011 thesis.
 * Thanks! -- Taku (talk) 05:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

User:Deoshankarnavin/sandbox
''I, 202.41.10.5, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 202.41.10.5 (talk) 03:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The only content of the page was "Deo Shankar Navin". I suggest you start again.  Hut 8.5  07:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Allan Velasco Garcia
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Allan V. Garcia 04:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.  Hut 8.5  07:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Lastee
Article had reliable sources —Rusboot (talk) 14:00, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done as a contested soft deletion. Ping User:Gbawden as the AfD nominator.  Hut 8.5  22:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

iGrafx
Page has been deleted and restored previously, now for some reason deleted again —24.254.152.16 (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * It was last seen at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IGrafx in 2013. Are you requesting it to be recreated and moved to Draft:iGrafx? —C.Fred (talk) 22:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Clearsettle


Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 22:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

iGrafx
This page was previously deleted then restored. No log of when last deleted, by who, or reason. —24.254.152.16 (talk) 22:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC) Please Restore page.
 * For the benefit of any admin who wants to review this, thanks to a series of page moves the article in question is here. Although the company is notable in Wikipedia terms, looking at the deleted article I'd consider it pure spam and would be very reluctant to restore it. &#8209; Iridescent 22:09, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:TribalVision
''I, Gwilks401, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gwilks401 (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  22:11, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Rick Mitry
The article does not say why it was deleted. If there was a problem with the content, something should have been posted so that those problems could be remedied and the content could be changed. —120.151.134.79 (talk) 22:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Rick Mitry, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 22:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

UCD American Football
{{subst:refund|1= UCD American Football |2= Page had no right to be deleted, as the team still exists in Ireland and was to be updated by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.17.206.206 (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. see UCD American Football Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:34, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

‪Chung Eui-yong‬
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —AdmiralNelson (talk) 02:22, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Someone add sources in Chung eui Yong it no need for deletion it alright
 * ❌ The problem is that the content was copied from http://www.amchamkorea.org/flyer/2010/InnovationSeminar/2nd/bio_Eui-Yong%20Chung.pdf . It needs to be rewritten from scratch. Or else the source web site should be modified to release the content under the same or compatible license. (I have now deleted another copy of the same content in userspace). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

The Rinaldi Group
I request to restore/undelete the article The Rinaldi Group. How can an article be deleted on the basis of only a single vote? Deleting the article without proper AFD discussion is very inappropriate. Please also consider that editor (user: Mattyjohn) who participated in the AFD is a non-active user, who merely have any contribution over Wikipedia. I was about to vote for keeping the article, but before that, the article was deleted. I believe the subject is notable and fulfills the Wikipedia's notability requirement. Also, the reason for nominating the article for deletion was just an opinion, and Wikipedia sees the facts, not an opinion. —Nausad Ahmed 15:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Was closed as WP:SOFTDELETE. SoWhy 15:38, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Application readiness
I want to finish it, I forgot about it but an email reminded me, it is done, I just need to make some changes. —Matija Kordic (talk) 11:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 15:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Widdershins, LLC
The company in question came into controversy in the same vein as the metoo hashtag. It is notable because it serves as an instance of a rather large company in the cosplay/steampunk community who ran multiple large events on the east coast having to deal with the founder being accused of misconduct, sexual and otherwise, which has already begun to resonate across the cosplay, comic-con, and steampunk event communities. —66.210.114.12 (talk) 20:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
 * ... and nominated for deletion at Articles for deletion/Widdershins, LLC. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:53, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Facundo Barcelo
''I, Struway2, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Struway2 (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)


 * ✅ by your command --Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 23:50, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

ESforce
See the comments at Draft talk:ESforce (moved from Draft:ESforce). The article should be undeleted and moved back to the draft namespace so that the author, MariaKR, can continue working on it. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:58, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done see Draft:ESforce Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Anton Vitkovskiy
24.185.174.236 (talk) 06:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Dj younjosh
Reliable sources were present —Rusboot (talk) 07:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:57, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Peter W Weber
I intend to improve this draft to article-quality. —Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator . Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 19:10, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Can I email it to you? As is, it will just get tagged for CSD again and we'll keep cycling this way.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 19:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't have any personal investment in it, to be honest. How promotional was it? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * A total rewrite would be best. I think the lead was OK, if memory serves. --Dloh cier ekim </b> (talk) 23:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Meh, never mind then. Thanks, Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:06, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I wasn't very helpful there.--<b style="color:black">Dloh cier ekim </b> (talk) 02:54, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem though, thanks. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 20:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:The_Oregon_Golf_Club
Ready to continue updating. Deleted because draft wasn't updated in 6 months. Ready to finish project —Jrossduce (talk) 19:31, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done history restored, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:The_Oregon_Golf_Club&oldid=710055263 Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Neermaathalathinte pookkal
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —117.221.187.130 (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:16, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

File:ThreeValleysWaterLogo1.png
This is a historical logo and would help to illustrate the history of Veolia Water Central with commentary. —Cloudbound (talk) 21:05, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done please use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Dolores Cannon
{{subst:refund|1= Dolores Cannon |2= None of the administrators who deleted the Dolores Cannon page in 2013 have responded to repeated inquiries asking them to reconsider. Dolores Cannon died on October 18, 2014, and she deserves to have a page on Wikipedia that documents her life and achievements like any other author. This decision was made arbitrarily and in a discriminatory fashion, with obvious bias, and with incorrect information, including a claim that her books were all self-published. She wrote 19 books published by different publishing companies including Ozark Mountain Publishing. Her last two books, The Search for Hidden Sacred Knowledge (2014), and The Convoluted Universe: Book V (2015), where published posthumously by Ozark Mountain Publishing. Dolores Cannon was born on April 15, 1931 and died on October 18, 2014. Obituary: http://www.brashearsfuneralhome.net/obituary/2752170. Dolores Cannon's website: https://www.dolorescannon.com. The official website for Dolores Cannon's Quantum Healing Hypnosis Technique (QHHT): https://www.qhhtofficial.com. The popular website Collective Evolution has covered Dolores Cannon in several articles and interviews: http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/02/19/we-are-living-in-the-most-important-time-in-the-history-of-the-universe-dolores-cannon-discusses-our-current-paradigm/

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/05/12/the-secrets-of-ancient-history-are-locked-deep-within-your-subconscious-mind-this-is-how-you-can-access-it/

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/01/30/what-i-learned-from-dolores-cannons-work-how-it-changed-my-life/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkkMi1e-wB0&ab_channel=DoloresCannon

Dolores Cannon also appeared on Conscious Media Network which was later broadcast on Gaia TV, among many other TV appearances:

https://www.gaia.com/video/dolores-cannon-et-s-and-human-evolution

Dolores Cannon was and is a respected figure in the metaphysical community and New Age Movement and a pioneer of past life regression. If the editors who deleted this page have personal beliefs that do not accept metaphysical concepts that is irrelevant to the question at hand: Dolores Cannon was a real person, an author and metaphysical researcher, hypnotist and past life regressionist. These are facts. They do not require belief to be valid any more than one must believe in any religious figure including Jesus Christ, or the Christian faith. Her books exist and her QHHT method of hypnosis continues to be practiced and taught by an increasing number of people around the world today. Therefore we request this page be reinstated.
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Dolores Cannon, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The new references still seem to be interviews or non-independent of the the subject, so the issues in the deletion debate are not yet resolved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * You might also want to read the policy Wikipedia is not a memorial website. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Nothing to do with memorial, she was a pioneer in her field and extremely well-know. Who are you to decide what gets included and what doesn't? Really sick of these Wikipedia Nazis deleting things for no reason. 74.72.186.163 (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Wolfgang Römer
''I, Panthersilea, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Panthersilea (talk) 01:42, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Piezodorus guildinii
''I, Alarob, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' I made the mistake of doing some work on the article in a text editor and not publishing them to Wikipedia. I'm amazed that I didn't get around to it for months! -- ℜ ob C. alias ALAROB 02:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
 * Please find time to work on it. If you don't, and it's deleted again in 6 months, it's unlikely to be restored upon a second request. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Stephen Mbogo
The article about Stephen Mbogo is back at that title, so the talk page should now be undeleted (possibly temporarily, as the article is currently under BLPPROD, and may have sources added later). —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Christopher Freeze
''I, HansDelbrück, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' HansDelbrück (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Follow the instructions when you want to submit. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Roscoe Divine
Deleted more than 10 years ago. Deleting editor has apparently disappeared. —Trackinfo (talk) 09:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Seems to have been an IAR delete, but I hope you can improve the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Operation: Eco-Nightmare
Also request the undeletion of Operation: Weather Disaster (will merge them into the same article as they are two games in a series). Was deleted from the mainpage with edit summary "Undersourced, incubate in draftspace". I forgot these articles existed in my draftspace until they were deleted recently from being untouched. Would like another crack at getting it mainspace ready. —Coin945 (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
 * Draft:Operation: Weather Disaster is not deleted. The mainspace title by the same name is just a disallowed cross-namespace redirect and won't be restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Naanol Tesfaye
It is a clear violation of CSD G4/8! I have reviewed it and the subject is an icon of Ethiopian football, he is one of the youngest players ever to reach these merits and per relevance criteria is very-accepted for a note, It's bizarre it was deleted and I am expecting it to become put back ASAP, thank you. Per GNG he is notable CSD G8 require an identical text which it very was not. Please re-put the article ASAP... I via GNG request the article to be re-created and any bias in regards to former deletion is not ideal when notability is explained, I expect it to become re-input. The subject has received compliments from a nationality football president while coverage has been made in platforms such as TV, radio, magazines, and media, it is very clear coverage and via GNG he is at the very least acceptable. As mentioned I expect it to become re-published ASAP and at the very least the article sourcing could increase which wikipedians can do. Good day & best regards—Avaay (talk) 22:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done If you feel that the article was not a substantial recreation, then you need to contact directly. If you are not satisfied with the deleting admin's explanation, your next recourse is WP:Deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 22:47, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I have undeleted it and AfD'ed it, at Articles for deletion/Naanol Tesfaye (2nd nomination). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * It has subsequently been speedy deleted under CSD G5; is blocked as a sockpuppet. —C.Fred (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

DAGames
Just because one person couldn't find reliable sources doesn't mean that an article should be deleted. There was no real discussion on the subject matter. The article was swiftly deleted based off of a problem that could be easily fixed. There're reliable sources about and surrounding DAGames. You just have to look harder to find them. —Dannyyankee12 (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please add those sources. (and you could have commented at the AFD before it closed!) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Rodrigo Doxandabarat
I wish to keep working on the draft until all requirements are met for it to get published as an article —Nicolas.quintieri (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:High pressure fog systems
(no text provided) Francois Weber (talk) 13:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  20:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Stand By (film)
Requesting for undeletion so that it may be improved with sources. Was deleted as a creation of blocked editor — ✝iѵ ɛɳ  २२४० †ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * There wasn't a lot there to be honest, just a one sentence plot summary and a cast listing.  Hut 8.5  20:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * ok than I'll recreate the article. Thanks -- ✝iѵ ɛɳ  २२४० †ลℓк †๏ мэ 01:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

List of Singapore MRT disruptions
Page was deleted for being a collation of unnotable delays and disruptions, and I intend to salvage the remaining content as a 'main page' for major events (such as Joo Koon rail accident, Nicoll Highway collapse and others). Also quoting what the nominator said "only the ones with articles are worth keeping" and most of the major one have or warrants an article. —1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 02:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/List of Singapore MRT disruptions, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Given the amount of POV and minor stuff that should go, I think it might be better to start from scratch, as a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * OK then, Thanks! 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 14:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Naji Omar
''I, Najmusic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Najmusic (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:European Air Ambulance
''I, Pinballdot, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Pinballdot (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Loha Vete
''I, 78.196.197.214, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 78.196.197.214 (talk) 11:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I have concerns that the previous draft is too promotional in tone; we'd be better served if a draft was started from scratch than bringing back three-year-old spam. —C.Fred (talk) 18:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Adele Pickvance
''I, Fathoming, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Fathoming (talk) 05:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 18:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ruth Greenspan Bell
''I, Cruz1016, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Cruz1016 (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  22:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Roomi S. Hayat
—124.109.51.254 (talk) 08:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC) It was deleted due to link with website. It is an organizational website having authentic information about its people so please restore
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Roomi S. Hayat (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Read the debate to see why it was deleted. Notability proofs need independent sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:02, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

aix1
i (It's a draft for editing so what's the problem ? I'm still working on it [references]) —Akesc (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You're going to have to ask, who deleted the draft as well as the main space article, if it would be OK to work on it in draft space. The article was already deleted as a result of Articles for deletion/AIX1, which indicates that the topic is not suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything worth userfying. If they want me to email them the content, I will, but I suspect they have it already since they recreated it and then moved it to draft to try to avoid CSD. If they want an emailed copy, they can reach out to me on my talk page. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Whoever Was Using This Bed
''I, Andykay71, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Andykay71 (talk) 10:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:ScienceAtHome
''I, Patriciazsofia, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Patriciazsofia (talk) 13:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:48, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Brandon Amison
''I, 73.166.85.125, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 73.166.85.125 (talk) 05:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Orghielleis
Recently AfD'd here: I asked the closer to draftify the article to my user space here User_talk:Sandstein so I could improve the article as mentioned in the AfD and they agreed. —SportingFlyer  talk  06:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done see User:SportingFlyer/Orghielleis.  Hut 8.5  07:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

User:PittsburghRangers/sandbox
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —PittsburghRangers (talk) 05:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  07:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Ravi Teja's Touch Chesi Chudu.jpg
It was removed from Touch Chesi Chudu by an IP user without an edit summary. —-- <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  08:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Please use it to avert deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Odiyan
Hi, this page about a local legend was AFD'd due to lack of sources, in June 2017. Later, a film on the same name Odiyan (2018 film) was created and was moved to Odiyan (film) and finally to Odiyan. So, could you restore the original deleted page into a draft or into my user page ? I would like to rework and recreate it as sufficient sources are available now. Thanks. —-- Let There Be Sunshine 16:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅. I have restored the deleted revisions. They were all from before the AFD, July 2017 and earlier. There isn't much there, to be honest. You can find the revisions in the article history. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks. Could you separate that into a draft or user page. My plan was to request the film page to be moved to Odiyan (film) and move the draft/user page to Odiyan after a rework.-- Let There Be Sunshine 06:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You can do that yourself. All of the revision history has been restored. Simply click on the "history" tab and go back to July 2017. As far as I can tell, all the revisions are about the same subject, so it would be inappropriate to create a fork of two articles on the same topic. It isn't technically possible to move selected revisions into a separate article. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Skippa da Flippa
Someone deleted it —73.199.114.145 (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's true. The article was created by . If that is you, then you need to get your sockmaster account unblocked before you can do any more work on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Matt Ox
My Draft is deleted —73.199.114.145 (talk) 18:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Was it yours? It was created by . Is that you? Or are you one of the accounts mentioned in the reply below? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

The DuchAz
notable musician with reliable sources —Rusboot (talk) 07:53, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:53, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ...and deleted again as advertising and copyvio. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I just restored the thing per request-- see my talk. Then redelted as a copyvio. --<b style="color:black">Dloh cier ekim </b> (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Userfy deleted At Boshoff
Can the deleted page on At Boshoff please be userfied for me so I can keep editing it and keep adding 3rd party sources. —Mvnrsa (talk) 06:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Timothy Freke
LuciaAnna (talk) 20:59, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Draft:Timothy Freke, which is appallingly promotional and relies on what the subject says about himself. Please be aware, LuciaAnna, that we do not care what the subject says about himself, his philosophy, his books, etc. We care about what reliable, notable third-party sources have to say about him. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  22:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jillian Aversa
''I, 96.255.83.58, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 96.255.83.58 (talk) 22:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Done – history restored see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Jillian_Aversa&action=history for early versons. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Marjorie Nodelman
''I, L7schwartz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' L7schwartz (talk) 23:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

List of Jungle Beat episodes
Considering that Jungle Beat has been running since 2005, I highly doubt that it is not notable as claimed by the PRODder. Same for Sunrise Productions. —LaundryPizza03 (talk) 07:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:07, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

User:14Sommer/Comparison old European Hydronymy
''I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shaza Zafer Al Jundi
''I, Khaledalwarea, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Khaledalwarea (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:12, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Portals
''I, Cmedits, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Cmedits (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC) Cmedits (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Equestria Daily


This is more like asking for opinions, as circumstances have changed regarding this website: it was added to the Library of Congress yesterday. This probably boosts the significance of the website in some way and therefore its case needs to be reconsidered, although I'm personally indifferent to the final decision. Thoughts? 88.182.48.88 (talk) 09:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The Library of Congress collects everything published. So its appearance in that library is no claim of significance, but only a claim of existence. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah? I thought they had some selective process in place. They cannot collect every single personal blog post or Youtube video which was trending for five minutes at some point.88.182.48.88 (talk) 10:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * They would select web pages, but it does not prove notability, unless someone there wrote a story about the web site. If a newspaper published a story about LOC collecting that site, then that would show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:35, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I see your point... I guess? Anyway, it looks like nobody out there covered its entry in the LoC, except for Slate who mentioned briefly its archiving last year, which is odd, since ED themselves say it happened yesterday. Weird. Anyway, nobody seems to have covered it extensively, so I guess it's settled.88.182.48.88 (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Romanal
''I, 178.49.152.66, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 178.49.152.66 (talk) 14:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  17:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Zak Elbouzedi
This article was deleted as a result of AfD a couple of months ago. It has been re-created, and it looks like it will pass AfD this time because Elbouzedi's soccer career has advanced. Is it appropriate to undelete and merge the deleted version for proper attribution? Thanks! —Jack N. Stock (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done I've restored the history, if there's anything in there you think is usable then feel free to add it in.  Hut 8.5  17:49, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Human Design
For many years now I have repeatedly encountered people telling me they were surprised that there is no Human Design article on Wikipedia, typically after I tell them about itq and they do a little research on their own. I have probably been told by 10 or 15 different people how surprised they were that no Wikipedia article exists. I finally spent a couple hours today reading everything I could on this particular deletion and what I've found is that the previous Human Design System page was deleted via the Articles for Deletion (AFD) process but this page, "Human Design," was only deleted with reference to the previous AFD. So I am not sure how that fits in as to whether it should be added to Requests for Undeletion or whether it's a request for review. In any case, it's been about 9 years since the original page was deleted. Nothing has changed since then in terms of notability, although Human Design was notable then as well, as evinced by the plethora of books and websites about it as a topic. These are books and websites in many languages, all over the world, from authors who do not know each other, so it's not like it's just some small group who is studying and writing about this topic. On Feb 9 2009 the Human Design page was deleted with "No claim of notability." Then it was deleted again one year later for being about a group or company with no indication of the importance or significance. Deleted again for "unambiguous advertising" for listing a book written about it. I agree with this latter statement, that the book has no place in the article. What I would be interested in is a simple, factual description of what Human Design is, and its history. —fissionchips303 (talk) 22:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ( Non-administrator comment ) The most recent iteration of the article was userfied to User:Mikemahalo/Human Design, but judging by its appearance, I'd advise starting over from scratch if you're looking for "a simple, factual description of what Human Design is", assuming it meets Wikipedia's notability standards to begin with, which looks doubtful to me at first glance. --<b style="color: green;">Finngall</b> <sup style="color: #D4A017;">talk 00:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

I cannot read User:Mikemahalo/Human Design as it appears it was deleted. I assume it had zero useful content. I would be willing to write a couple paragraphs about the topic if it is notable. There are at least 6 threads on Quora asking for info about Human Design, with a lot of responses, and there are some authors (none of which I have found yet who have a Wikipedia page, so I suppose not notable authors) who have written about it both positively and negatively. For instance, Morten Tolboll is a published author who wrote a critique of it. But then, he is not notable enough for a Wikipedia entry so I'm not sure what that means for notability. I think it is kind of unfortunate how many people ask about it, and are obviously trying to find objective information, rather than simply trusting the proponents of it, but if it isn't notable then I suppose they can continue to wonder why Wikipedia has articles on things like "netflix and chill" but not something that literally thousands of people have spent 10s of thousands of hours studying. fissionchips303 (talk) 12:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm prepared to restore the version at User:Mikemahalo/Human Design if you want but it is frankly pretty terrible and I think you'd be better off starting from scratch. The title Human Design has been protected against creation because of the number of times articles have been created at that title and then deleted. If you want to write an article on Human Design then your best bet is to write the best draft you can and then get it reviewed - first try asking the protecting admin and if they say no you can try deletion review to get outside input. I doubt anyone will want to unprotect it without a decent draft which addresses the concerns which have been raised about previous versions, particularly our guidelines on notability and fringe theories.  Hut 8.5  12:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Hut 8.5. I cannot see the version you are referencing but I would not want a terrible version to be restored. Thank you for the advice. Appreciate it. fissionchips303 (talk) 01:36, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I've created a draft page here and will contact the protecting admin. Draft:Human Design. Thanks again for your help. fissionchips303 (talk) 02:47, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Edulji Navroji Mehta
There was no need for the page to be deleted. The person in the article was sufficiently significant —Vipcarortann (talk) 05:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.  Hut 8.5  07:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Kurt Hill
The reason for deletion is not at all true. Currently I compete in Asia's top formula racing category called Asian Formula Renault Series. Please see wiki page 2018_Asian_Formula_Renault_Series. —Khracing96 (talk) 07:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ~ GB fan 09:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:John Morgan Wells
''I, Pbsouthwood, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' &middot; &middot; &middot; Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:25, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Geoffrey James (writer)
Please undelete it and merge histories with Geoffrey James (journalist). - recently recreated and appars to have reasonable notability, for at least three things: The Tao of Programming, several other less famous books, and award-winning blog. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC) —Staszek Lem (talk) 21:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Oleg Prezhdo
''I, ParmeetNijjar, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' ParmeetNijjar (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)