Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 304

Draft:Example
Shoshi.p (talk) 06:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Draft:ScholarshipOwl restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:59, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:King Slim Soul
''I, Uanfala, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. – Uanfala (talk) 11:33, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: . ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡)  14:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Tom White (sculptor)
''I, Emadams95, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Emadams95 (talk) 15:08, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

ryck collyns
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Ryck Collyns (talk) 16:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC) why
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done This was vandalism, which is not tolerated on Wikipedia. To be honest, your account looks like it's WP:NOTHERE. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mingo OK
''I, Jjjjjjdddddd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 15:34, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Jjjjjjdddddd, there's really nothing there to restore. The only content was this:
 * There's nothing to stop you from creating a new draft, however. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh, really? Never mind then. Thanks, Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Severelevels.jpg
The file was deleted because "Unused. Little foreseeable use." However it is used as part of User:Animum/Vandalism information which is used both in Template:Vandalism_information/gallery and transcluded on several user pages. Every time the level goes to its highest these pages all just show an error. —KylieTastic (talk) 19:25, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Gasable
The app is used for ordering butane gas for home delivery throughout the Middle East. Could not find many references in English (though there are a couple of good ones in the article), but there are many in Arabic. It's the first app of its kind, and it's a good reference for other similar apps that may start popping up in the West —ShabbatShalom (talk) 22:25, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, "delete because of a paucity of English-language sources" is a horrifically bad deletion rationale, and smacks of the nominator not doing a sources check with automated translation beforehand. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 00:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Teton Guitars
''I, Mistermoab, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Mistermoab (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Pompea Smith
''I, 82.61.144.170, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 82.61.144.170 (talk) 08:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

It has been over six months since I have been able to edit this article —Lily Prigioniero (talk) 08:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Draft restored Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Rajesh Ram Satiija
In last a few years, Rajesh Ram Satiija has become an inspiration for those who want to commence their business journey in Mining. His journey from humble roots to multimillion business is inspiring millennials in India to start their business on the foreign land. He has been featured in many reputable and trustworthy platforms including The Guardian and Business Insider and many people want to know more about him. And there's no other platform as reliable as Wikipedia. His story is not merely a resume but an inspiring story which is actually encouraging people in India and Africa. As far I have researched the reason for deleting Rajesh Ram Satiija page is the entire page talks about his wealth only which is not true. The page also details his philanthropy, his association with Indian Council for United Nations Relations and there are reliable references for the same. There's no advertisement on the page. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Garima77Singh (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done advertisement. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Fluffy Critter
The Fluffy Critter cocktail is a notable entity, as shown by the external references. The Fluffy Critter was included in an article by the BBC which ironically matched cocktails to major political figure's personalities and styles. Also, it is the cocktail of choice of the Red Bull Formula 1 racing team. —2001:8003:4411:8800:4C3F:5536:4217:369B (talk) 12:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. —C.Fred (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Nippon Bearing Co. Ltd.
Hello, Nippon Bearing is one of the biggest ball bearing manufacturers in the world and should be represented on Wikipedia. It already exists in the Japanese Wikipedia. By now I gathered more independent sources from Scientific Magazines etc. —Marvinwest (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done See above, as this never made it to article space. —C.Fred (talk) 15:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Nippon Bearing Co. Ltd.
''I, Marvinwest, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Marvinwest (talk) 12:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: . @Marvinwest: You made a request for restoration last year, but the article sat unimproved. I strongly suggest that you actually work on it; otherwise, it may be more difficult to have it restored next time. —C.Fred (talk) 15:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Rajesh Ram Satiija (2nd request)
There's no advertisement on the page, neither it's a resume of a person. His journey from humble roots to multimillion business is inspiring millennials in India to start their business on the foreign land. He has been featured in many reputable and trustworthy platforms including The Guardian and Business Insider and many people want to know more about him. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it and need to update the page. —Garima77Singh (talk) 12:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Rajesh Ram Satiija, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. @Garima77Singh: Additionally, as you noted, a version of the page was deleted for blatant promotion. You should not use that as a starting point for a new article; it would be better to start fresh with a new draft. I have no objections to you creating Draft:Rajesh Ram Satiija for that purpose; make sure you cite The Guardian and other reliable sources as you build the draft. —C.Fred (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Please don't make multiple requests. This has already been declined twice. Follow the advice in the reply. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ty J. Young
''I, Smithnr, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Smithnr (talk) 17:10, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

New edits which should allow for publishing —Smithnr (talk) 17:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Gavin Hardkiss
''I, Gavareli, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Gavareli (talk) 19:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Due Justice (film) concern
''I, StarWix, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' StarWix (talk) 00:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

This film is in pre-production and our time to edit on Wikipedia is extremely limited as we spend massive hours creating the movie. We will work much harder to update this page regularly. —StarWix (talk) 00:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a substitute for a billboard. Also, we do not allow shared accounts what-so-ever. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 00:15, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:@HOLLYWOOD
@HOLLYWOOD is a company created in 2001 by actor Jerry Buys. I want the world to know who my company is and that I am the owner/creator of @HOLLYWOOD CORPORATION and who/what we are about. We will work much harder to update this page regularly. —StarWix (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)}}
 * That isn't what Wikipedia is for. Try using social media or another suitable website. For more details, see WP:Notability and WP:Notability (organizations and companies). Finally, we don't allow shared accounts. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 00:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:At Hollywood Entertainment
@HOLLYWOOD is the LOGO of the company (yes) created in 2001 by actor Jerry Buys including At Hollywood Entertainment, At Hollywood Productions, the original @HOLLYWOOD CORPORATION in California and others. WE OPERATE SEVERAL LIVE @HOLLYWOOD WEBSITES ON THE INTERNET including @HOLLYWOPOD RADIO AMONG MANY OTHERS. I want the world to know who my company is and that I am the owner/creator of @HOLLYWOOD CORPORATION and who/what we are about. We will work much harder to update this page regularly. —StarWix (talk) 00:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That isn't what Wikipedia is for. Try using social media or another suitable website. For more details, see WP:Notability and WP:Notability (organizations and companies). Finally, we don't allow shared accounts. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 00:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Grace Kennedy (BBC British Singer)
After undeleting the talk page, it should be moved back to where it was, Talk:Grace Kennedy (singer). Since Grace Kennedy (BBC British Singer) was deleted, no redirect is needed. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done  Hut 8.5  06:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Anna Margareta Jonsson Borgeryd
''I, Poljw, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Poljw (talk) 07:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:St Davids Society of Singapore
A society web page which has gone through member turnover and now able to update to publish —Adbcook (talk) 02:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you implying that the account you're using is shared? —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 07:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Condé + Beveridge
Hi. I will remove all copyrighted material and re-submit. I want the draft page sent to me as there is a lot of other material that is not copyright. surlyaaron —Surlyaaron (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * . You'll have to start over from scratch. We cannot legally restore copyright violations. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Could the page be emailed to me rather than restored? surlyaaron — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surlyaaron (talk • contribs) 16:45, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: Restoring to email was my advice at Teahouse. As far as I know, there should be no problem with that. Copyrighted material can be removed before the unproblematic parts of the draft are re-published. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The copyrighted part is about 100% of the prose. The rest is just a big list exhibitions. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I agree that the majority is a long list of exhibits. It is the long list that I would like to access! It took a long time to look up the sites and create the links, etc. Surlyaaron (talk) 17:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

My Face (album)
Can the deleted edit history at this page please be restored per any possible WP:CWW concerns? (I am not concerned if I am credited as the page's creator or not, but it seems that this redirect, per the page's deletion log, may have been erroneously deleted in 2013, considering that the first entry in the deletion/move log was moving this page to the target I created this page/redirect to target.) — Steel1943 (talk) 15:37, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The only things appearing in the deleted contributions are things that already mirror the logs:

00:12, 5 January 2013. . Legobot (talk | contribs | block) m (53 bytes) (Robot: Redirect to a deleted or non-existent page) 23:38, 9 January 2011. . Tassedethe (talk | contribs | block) (21 bytes) (moved My Face (album) to My Face: no need for dab)
 * Perhaps you mean My Face? That had 10 deleted edits, which I have restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Good find, but yes, I do believe that I'm referring to the two deleted edits which you refer since the redirect was originally created as a R from move. Steel1943  (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I have restored those too. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ ... since I'm not sure if the bot needs this to archive or not, so it can't hurt. Steel1943  (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * no, not needed, but doesn't hurt to add. The archiver goes by the date of the most recent comment in a section. Some of these requests don't even get resolved before the archiver takes them off the page. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Example
Nitareeny (talk) 02:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * So what do you want restored? Draft:Zack Love or Draft:Sex in the Title? I can bring back only the versions without copying from other places. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Please restore Draft:Zack Love. Thank you. Nitareeny (talk) 17:58, 1 May 2018 (UTC) Nitareeny
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:09, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you' (talk) 21:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Nitareeny

Draft:Crashing The Party (film)
''I, Dem2004, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' McHistoryNerd (talk) 19:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Gamma_Phi_Circus
Gamma Phi Circus is THE SINGLE OLDEST circus arts school in the U.S. and world famous. It absolutely should have a wikipedia page, and had one without complaint for TWELVE YEARS. Frankly the nominating editor seems to have a vendetta against circus pages. —Bedno (talk) 20:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Soft delete reversed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't think that accusing me of things is a valid point to restore a page. Obviously, no one bothered for those twelve years to acturately check the topic's notability, of which there appears to be little. Paris' oldest cornershop does not have an article either and so does Poland's oldest church. The circus is not world famous or anywhere near that, it's just those wild claims flung around, just like on Triton, that triggered the deletion request in the first place. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 23:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Battle For Dream Island
Although I am not a creator of the page, I wanna say why Battle For Dream Island should not be deleted: Firstly, this should not be deleted because this series has become popular in 2018, the latest episode "Enter The Exit" has 511,333 views. The first episode "Take the plunge" had 70,067,617 views (Part 1 and Part 2 combined, Part 1 has 56,009,413 views and the Part 2 has 14,058,251 views.) Secondly, this is show that inspired by other people, they make shows like for example, "Inanimate Insanity", "Object Insanity" or "Code Red (Created by TTGuy10000)". Last but not least, that page was created when the show was unpopular back in 2013 / 2010 (IDK) and as I mentioned before, it become popular now. —John Harry Lau (talk) 06:53, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator instead. None of those rationales count for notability as Wikipedia defines it what-so-ever. In fact, appeals to popularity and number of views/followers are among the worst arguments you can make on this page. —Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 07:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I've no idea about whether Battle for Dream Island is a notable topic now but the content deleted in 2015 was minimal and based on unreliable sources so undeleting it would be of no use. If you think it is now a notable subject and you can create some content supported by reliable sources then I suggest you start afresh at Draft:Battle for Dream Island.  Nthep (talk) 13:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Robin King
I would like to improve the article in order to re-submit —Wrk1945 (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Nthep (talk) 22:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:WebERP
''I, RafaelEChacon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' RafaelEChacon (talk) 02:22, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Christopher Freeze
''I, HansDelbrück, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' HansDelbrück (talk)
 * Someone submitted my previous draft before it was ready for AfC consideration. Please replace it. Thanks. HansDelbrück (talk) 17:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done It appears that you have not edited this before. Please remove the promotional sounding text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Omard, Michigan
''I, Wikidumbo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Wikidumbo in the haus. (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The page was moved, see Omard, Michigan. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Ahmad Zohadi
''I request for the undelete of article which was deleted after being nominated for AfD under: GNG. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' | --Ganeshprasadkp (talk) 11:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:07, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Shali Kashmiris
''I, Amit shali, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Amit shali (talk) 07:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . You will need some real references to support this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:08, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ...And the restored page has been moved to Draft:Shali Kashmiris since the "Draft:" space is the preferred location for drafts. Steel1943  (talk) 18:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Choosey (rapper)
''I, Nate Whitsell, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Nate Whitsell (talk) 22:23, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ionix Advanced Tecnologies
''I, The Cat Whisperer, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' The Cat Whisperer (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Rubber elasticity/models/Integrated Network models
I have made significant changes to the article in response to the editors objections that it was too difficult to read —Davidhanson471 (talk) 15:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 19:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

You asked "what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article?". I have made significant changes to the text in my article (/Integrated network models/ on the /Rubber Elasticity page that should make it more accessible to non-scientific readers. I think that the rest of the Rubber elasticity page needs to be revised but I have not done that pending some review of my revisions.  Can you tell me how to properly request a review of the current article? Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidhanson471 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Privacy, free expression, and transparency
The content of the article is useful, I'd like an opportunity to rework it and published under either a different title or break it down to add to existing articles where appropriate, not sure why it was not just moved to drafts originally. —John Cummings (talk) 12:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Presumably the content can be found here: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002466/246610E.pdf . You can see Articles for deletion/Privacy, free expression, and transparency for why it was deleted and not userfied or turned to draft. It appears that people did not think it was a suitable topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:26, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , whilst the source text is available there a lot of work went into adding the references to the article, it would br very helpful to get it back. Thanks, John Cummings (talk) 13:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As the deleting admin, do you object to userfication? I see over 140 citations in the last deleted revision of that article. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * To close this off, Ritchie333 restored this to Draft:Privacy, free expression, and transparency. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The Daisygrinders
More citations are about to be referenced to satisfy the notability criteria, previously questioned by moderators —Drewza7 (talk) 05:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I cannot see that there was such an article or draft (with or without the or capitals). Please check the name. You have no deleted contributions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually ✔️ see Draft:The Daisygrinders. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Piedmont (ecoregion)
Was speedily deleted (in error) as copyright infringement of a state's page which was copied from EPA Public Domain - Government material.
 * Deleter has not responded in a month. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vegaswikian#Back_to_Piedmont
 * https://web.archive.org/web/20090323083835/http://georgiawildlife.dnr.state.ga.us/cwcsEcoregions_conservation.aspx
 * ftp://newftp.epa.gov/EPADataCommons/ORD/Ecoregions/al/alga_front.pdf

"Thank you for your inquiry. I was off last week and only catching up on emails now, so I hope it’s not too late. Are you looking for correct attribution, or to reproduce the maps? The maps are EPA (government-produced) publications so they can be reproduced without restriction.

Thank you for your interest in EPA science.

Aaron Ferster Lead Science Writer-Editor Communication Lead, Sustainable & Healthy Communities Research Program U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20460 Phone: (202) 564-0321 Cell: (202) 557-0696" —SEWilco (talk) 03:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * ✅, restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Rome Foundation
My page was deleted. I spent a lot of time researching and providing this information. I was trying to provide educational material on the Rome Foundation because there is NO information about in Wikipedia. It is a well-established international organization that helps patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. It is not promotional and may actually help someone improve their lives by connecting them to an organization that could helping them identify difficult diagnoses. Please restore! Can you please email me a copy of all the info that I worked so hard on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medwriter77 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: I requested deletion of the drafts. They were promotional, listed non notable board members, and were weighted with unencyclopedic technical explanations and copyright violation content. The user hasn't acknowledged or responded to COI and copyright violation issues. The request for undeletion underscores the likelihood of conflict of interest, as well as the promotional intent. 73.159.24.89 (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This is also being discussed at Deletion review/Log/2018 May 6. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done. Please confine discussion to Deletion review/Log/2018 May 6. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:The Voice (franchise) coaches
It was deleted as per G7, but 470 articles use this category, which is rather a lot, so I'm confused. Is undeletion an option for this category? —Bizarre BizarreTalk modern to me 19:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It could also be simply recreated with but the creating user also took 2.5 hours to put all those pages into the category. User:Linguist111 did not use edit summaries to explain themselves, so it is probably best to ask them about it. if you want to keep it, you will not want to have it removed. But there is probably a reason. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry about all this, guys. After I created the category last night, I was going to create, but then I saw that that category had been deleted via WP:CFD two years ago (under a different title, ) with the argument that the category failed WP:PERFNAV. And then I found that the category I created had been deleted via CFD under , so I speedy-tagged it. I thought a bot would automatically remove the category from the articles once it was deleted, but I take it this hasn't happened. I personally don't mind if you want this category undeleted, but I'd like to know what , who made the 2016 nominations I mentioned, thinks. Linguist un Eins uno (Linguist111) 23:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ by . I have no prejudice against a CfD discussion. Linguist un Eins uno (Linguist111) 13:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Falconbrook Primary School
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Cbriscoe (talk) 06:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Rome Criteria and Rome Process
The Rome Criteria and Rome Process page that I was working on for many hours was deleted from my sandbox without any notice. It was content about a well-established internationally known process to develop diagnostic criteria (in the medical field) that's been around a long time but there's no information about it on Wikipedia. I provided multiple credible references. I thought that was what Wikipedia was all about--telling the history of processes etc, especially those that don't have a story that's told yet. The Rome Process/criteria helps diagnose people with functional gastrointestinal disorders, thus people with this condition would be very much interested in this information. I spent a long time writing this and would like to know: 1.) the reasons why it was deleted 2.) if there is anything that can be changed so that it would be accepted 3.) if I can at least have the content back that I worked on for many hours. Also I'm curious to know which of these expert Wikipedia administrators can answer these questions: 1.) Can you tell me why other medical conditions are accepted as appropriate content here and not this condition (as I have seen MANY other medical conditions included on Wikipedia)? 2.)Are functional GI disorders not considered as important as other conditions? 3.) Could you justify that it's not important to someone who actually suffers from functional GI disorders? 4.) Can you tell me why it's ok for other foundations and organizations to be represented on Wikipedia but not this one? I've seen MANY on Wikipedia (Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, American Heart Association just to name 2 of many) 5.)If you are truly wanting to improve Wikipedia, why don't you all give constructive feedback on how to modify articles instead of unilaterally deleting someone's work without any notice? All information was factual information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medwriter77 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. Please confine discussion to Deletion review/Log/2018 May 6. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Billel Aggab
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —129.45.9.44 (talk) 10:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * , nothing to do. The article isn't deleted. You can participate in the AFD, though. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Rome Foundation (2)
The Rome Foundation page that I was working on for many hours was deleted from my sandbox without any notice. It was content about a well-established internationally known process to develop diagnostic criteria (in the medical field) that's been around a long time but there's no information about it on Wikipedia. I provided multiple credible references. I thought that was what Wikipedia was all about--telling the history of processes etc, especially those that don't have a story that's told yet. The Rome Process/criteria helps diagnose people with functional gastrointestinal disorders, thus people with this condition would be very much interested in this information. I spent a long time writing this and would like to know: 1.) the reasons why it was deleted 2.) if there is anything that can be changed so that it would be accepted 3.) if I can at least have the content back that I worked on for many hours. Also I'm curious to know which of these expert Wikipedia administrators can answer these questions: 1.) Can you tell me why other medical conditions are accepted as appropriate content here and not this condition (as I have seen MANY other medical conditions included on Wikipedia)? 2.)Are functional GI disorders not considered as important as other conditions? 3.) Could you justify that it's not important to someone who actually suffers from functional GI disorders? 4.) Can you tell me why it's ok for other foundations and organizations to be represented on Wikipedia but not this one? I've seen MANY on Wikipedia (Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, American Heart Association just to name 2 of many) 5.)If you are truly wanting to improve Wikipedia, why don't you all give constructive feedback on how to modify articles instead of unilaterally deleting someone's work without any notice? All information was factual information. Medwriter77 (talk) 17:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medwriter77 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * . No, that isn't what Wikipedia is about. The draft clearly existed for publicity or promotion purposes. That's why it was deleted. Please read our policy about what Wikipedia is not. We won't restore articles deleted in accordance with WP:G11. You must ask the deleting administrator about restoration. If he declines to restore it, then you can go to Deletion review to get a consensus as to whether the deletion was proper. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Medwriter77 has already contacted me in multiple ways. The matter is at Deletion review/Log/2018 May 6 and I request that all discussion of this page should be done there. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Would it be fair to revert off any further requests for this as long as the DRV is ongoing? —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 21:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I believe so. The editor has now been told multiple times that this page isn't the proper forum for discussing those articles, and further requests indicates a case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:54, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Neelanjona Neela
Deleted that page mistakenly, now i want to retrieve that page again —Rubayat Habib 13:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Macedonian Greek
''I, Ντουβισνός, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Ντουβισνός (talk) 18:51, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

I will continue working on the article —Ντουβισνός (talk) 18:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Blackcraig Castle
''I, 185.7.230.26, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 185.7.230.26 (talk) 10:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

linked to Facebook page and want to update content —185.7.230.26 (talk) 11:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I had to remove two sentences copied from the source. You must write content in your own words. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Christophe Caïs
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Dom from Paris (talk) 06:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC) This page was deleted as a G7 but as I had also edited it and I believe this subject may be notable I would like it restored. The article creator requested deletion after I added negative information to the article from one of the sources they provided. Probably originally a soapbox article from a COI editor but his role in a major company's demise strengthens the notability. Dom from Paris (talk) 06:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ✔️ by Anachronist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The article sort of looks like a hatchet job, even though it's short. If the subject is notable for just a single event (WP:BLP1E the ruination of a company), then it may be best to delete it. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I totally agree but I don't like the idea of editors that are not newbies thinking they can create puff articles and when there is negative information added (from sources they provided) think it's ok to blank the page and ask for deletion. I had a look and could not find much to support notability apart from his role in the ruination of biche de bere so I will be siding on delete in an Afd. Dom from Paris (talk) 08:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Rosa Honung
The page was deleted because "all references are dead links". Just because something goes 404 does not mean the facts disappear. Also it is possible to use something like the Wayback Archive to verify the sources. —Liftarn (talk) 14:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If a biographical source goes 404 it needs to be replaced or, failing that, the sentence it was supporting needs removed. —<i style="color: #228B22;">Jeremy</i> v^_^v  Bori! 17:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
 * Also, the page is create protected so that only extended-confirmed editors or administrators may re-create it. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The page was allegedly deleted according to A7, but it is not true as if fails the A7 criteria for deletion as there is credible claim of significance. I will contact the admin in question and see what happens. // Liftarn (talk) 10:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * No luck with that. He accused me of harassment and threatened to block me. // Liftarn (talk) 09:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network
''I, StenhoBJ, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' StenhoBJ (talk) 11:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

wikipedia.org/wiki/digitaljournal.com
Negative references suggest that Digital Journal is not a notable publication. Digital journal is a publication with one to three million readers a month. Any basic google search shows lots of external links, third party sources and more. This page should not have been deleted. —2607:FEA8:84C0:A42:CCE:44C:3A92:235 (talk) 01:25, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I've changed the target to point to the actual page, and not the redirect. —<i style="color: #228B22;">Jeremy</i> v^_^v  Bori! 02:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done with logo. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Paris & Simo
''I, EDMhouselover789, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' EDMhouselover789 (talk) 01:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It wasn't deleted, but I restored the 3 edits in the revision history. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Mike_Aho
The person in question is a heavyweight Hollywood player, following their trajectory seems appropriate. The page could be renamed Mike_C_Aho Carry being middle name —ds (talk) 01:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done but not moved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:56, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

User:PratyushSinha101/common.js
I feel I need the page now —Pratyush (talk) 15:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done  Hut 8.5  18:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

User:PratyushSinha101/vector.js
I need the page now —Pratyush (talk) 15:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done  Hut 8.5  18:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Jasmine Kaur Roy
''I, Roy.avinash, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Roy.avinash (talk) 16:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done I've restored the edit history of Draft:Jasmine Kaur Roy. There was already a draft there so you can't see the restored content visible immediately.  Hut 8.5  18:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Shamlal_Ahamed
I was trying to expand/draftify some of the members listed in top 100 business owners in Arab world as listed by Forbes in 2018. Could you please undelete it so that I can expand? —Ibrahimfx (talk) 14:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


 * This page was very promotional, it's very close to qualifying for deletion as spam. You'd likely be better off starting again. The sources cited were   if that helps.  Hut 8.5  18:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Steven Jones
''I, Zaltru, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Zaltru (talk) 01:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Reading Eggs
''I, Valerie.m, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Valerie.m (talk) 01:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Codeforces
I believe the topic is notable, and AfD discussion should take place —RedGreenCode (talk) 02:03, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. If you want an AFD, then please nominate it with appropriate reasons. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

WWWF
—5.41.13.147 (talk) 17:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The only deletion in the page history is a broken redirect from Dec 2015. G8s aren't generally restored without good reason, and this doesn't seem like one. —<i style="color: #228B22;">Jeremy</i> v^_^v  Bori! 22:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)