Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 31

Extended Community Canon project
Userfication -Daywalker03 (talk) 03:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done. Now at User:Daywalker03/Extended Community Canon project. Protonk (talk) 03:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Ontrac
Simple request of content for review of it; please undelete and move to a subpage of my user page. Thanks. - Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 06:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Dennisthe2/Ontrac. l'aquatique  [talk]  17:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Caspian pony
deleted in error while trying to edit -Lidibib (talk) 11:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ the page has not been deleted, just moved to Caspian Horse. Thryduulf (talk) 11:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

deleted page in error while trying to edit -86.135.118.133 (talk) 11:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC) deleted in error -86.135.118.133 (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ Actually on further investigation, the article has been stable at Caspian Pony for some time, but a new user tried (and apparently failed) to move to Caspian Horse, just leaving circular redirects. I've restored the content at Caspian Pony without prejudice to a properly executed page move if there is consensus for it. Thryduulf (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * they did a copy paste move to Caspian horse. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ I've now fixed the move.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Colonel Robert Morris
reasoning -75.66.159.39 (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ Sorry but this was discussed at AFD and there is a clear consensus that we shouldn't have an article on this subject. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, the clear consensus on the AfD was that the existing article was a copyright violation. If the content thereof was accurate, I believe a very good case can be made per WP:MUSICIAN that we should have an article about him (one, obviously, that reflects verifiability and respects copyrights). -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * After re-reading the AFD, you're probably right. However, we should definitely keep an eye on any such article for BLP issues seeing that the subject would rather we not have an article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Pullman (Chile)
Information not covered elsewhere. The main Pullman (car and coach) page has a link to European Pullman coaches: why should there not be a link to a Chile Pullman service that I researched with illustrations? -Duncanogi (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC) Duncanogi (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The only content on there aside from the scan of a ticket was "Pullman trains also operated in Chile." the article was deleted as a duplicate of an existing article.  I'm not sure that I agree with that decision, but I cant unilaterally reverse it.  You could leave a note on the deleting admin's talk page asking to have the article restored. Protonk (talk) 17:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The contributing editor created the article so that he could upload his own photo. His contributions consist in no small part of scanning family photos and uploading them to pages that have the tiniest possible link to the subject (usually at screen-breaking sizes). I disagree that "research with illustrations" is the correct term to use. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

steve acito
note was placed that there was limited link or support material for article but there was some present and more was being added. i asked each of the others who flagged the article for help - and was hoping for response, none was given. this article should be on wiki in my opinion, it may need help to be wikified but it is close and i have support info for every element mentioned - I just don't have the knowledge or skill set to put it in at this point. I am hoping for some insight from a wiki guru  -Cinematographer23 (talk) 18:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted because it covered a living subject but contained no substantive references about the person. All you need to do in order to allow me or another admin to restore the article is provide one reference which covers the subject in substantive detail.  The source must be reliable but you don't have to know how to format it for wikipedia or anything.  A bare link will suffice. Protonk (talk) 18:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Well World
reasoning -M@ (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

A plot summary is not simply cruft. This page is referenced from other pages.M@ (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done. Restored as a contested proposed deletion.  Note that without reliable, secondary sources the article may be nominated for deletion still. Protonk (talk) 05:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Sam Plank
 Sam Plank has just died and I was searching for obituary material.

He has in fact had a very varied career with significant achievements in changing the face of local broadcasting and many charitable and political campaigns.

Please reinstate his page urgently so that people can add to it.

The ADMINISTRATOR concerned is taking a WIKIBREAK so I cannot contact him. Nompere (talk) 09:01, 11 February 2011 (UTC)nompere
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

MARSEC-XL
MARSEC-XL Foundation is an existing (since 2007) not-for-profit foundation dedicated to the dissemination of marine software engineering and promoting more openness in the maritime industry. MARSEC-XL is a foundation in Malta, Europe operating under the Maltese law. MARSEC-XL is supported by the government of Malta and the maritime industry. This request is being submitted by the president of the MARSEC-XL Foundation, Krystyna Wojnarowicz. MARSEC-XL is active also in an open source community, currently working on an open source project for the maritime industry related to an open source software systems architecture, creating the backbone for marine software engineering. The deletion of the MARSEC-XL page as well as the deletion of the page related to marine software engineering was unjustified and causing direct harm to the entire maritime industry and open source initiatives. Please bring it back online immediately! Thank you   -Kissia13 (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, in case s/he wishes to consider nominating it at WP:Articles for deletion. What the article needs is references from independent reliable sources to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

marine software engineering
 -Kissia13 (talk) 00:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Um, can you be a little more clear about what page you want restored? l'aquatique  [talk]  05:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it is the same page that was restored a day or so ago. Look up a few threads. Protonk (talk) 05:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done it was Marine software engineering- I am going to move to Marine Software Engineering and will tack on a notice at the PROD nom's page (it was the same person that nominated the one you restored. l'aquatique  [talk]  05:37, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Erm, didn't read names close enough there. It was the same nom as the one JohnCD restored a few threads up... My mind is dead. l'aquatique  [talk]  05:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Ramesh Srinivasan
 The article was originally deleted by editor Atama for the following reasons "‎(WP:PROD: Nominated for seven days with no objection: Concern was: Non-notable per WP:ACADEMIC, unreferenced." I wish to submit a referenced article about this person that demonstrates the notability of this living American academic.  A draft of this article is in my userspace User:Kairyth/RameshArticleTest  -Kairyth (talk) 19:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Also note that I contacted editor Atama about this matter on 9 Feb 2011 with no response. Kairyth (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.. This is an unusual situation: both Atama, the admin who protected the title because the article had been repeatedly re-created, and the user who proposed for it deletion, have retired or are no longer actively editing. I have therefore restored the PRODded article, and you are welcome to update it in line with your draft. I have to say that neither version seems to me to show notability to the standard of WP:PROF - notability requires showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", and lengthy lists of writings by Dr Srinivasan are not a substitute, in notability terms, for substantial independent comment about him. Unless something more appears it is likely that this may be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 20:45, 11 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Also even though the more recent revisions don't have copyvio problems the first few revisions were copied from a CV online. So be careful reaching into past revisions to improve the article. Protonk (talk) 21:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Good point; I have deleted and restored without the copyvio versions in the history. JohnCD (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

BuySellAds
I dont see why this is should be deleted. All these companies do the same thin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdBrite http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdTaily http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blogads http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontera http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zedo why doesn this deserve to be there. i am a big fan of this. it helped me a lot. so i wish evryone to use it. correct me if i am wrong. i think everyone should be given a fair chance.
 * This article hasn't been deleted, so there's not much we can do for you. I have to say, as an admin that does speedy deletions, if it was my call I might easily delete it as spam. Since I've replied here, though, I will leave that to someone else. I would suggest you read how not to be a spammer and then go through your page and remove anything that sounds even remotely like an advertisement if you want the article to survive. l'aquatique  [talk]  06:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

It was not my intention. Im sorry. can u be a little more specific on the links that seem adverts. It was seriously not my intention to spam.


 * It's not links, it's kind of the whole article, it was written like an advertisement. Though, in the end it appears that it was deleted as non-notable- you may want to read our notability guideline and then talk to Nyttend, the admin that deleted it. Best, l'aquatique  [talk]  18:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Mersher Miller
Two days ago, the article on Mersher Miller was deleted via WP:PROD. I disagree with the decision for several reasons.


 * 1) It was proposed for deletion under the rational "Does not meet notability requirements" but doesn't mention "how" it fails. The article (#1) clearly establishes him as a notable underworld figure in New York's Lower East Side during the turn of the century and (#2) his saloon was the site of a notable robbery by Johnny Spanish.
 * 2) There were two reliable sources the article used, "The Apaches of New York" by Alfred Henry Lewis and "The Gangs of New York" by Herbert Asbury. The former book devoted an entire chapter to Miller.
 * 3) The administrator who deleted the article commented "90% of the article is about Mersher's brother, not him". This is, perhaps, a bit misleading since the article itself was a stub and primarily detailed the very notable robbery that occurred at his saloon (this was the crime that eventually forced Spanish to flee New York).

Here is a cached version of the original article. It could definitely use some expansion but the notability is obviously made clear in the introduction and includes reliable sources to support it (which is why it was created via WP:AFC in the first place). 71.184.55.112 (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ as a contested proposed deletion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 20:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

MILLMANTV1
reasoning -Cookienuts3 (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Please Undelete this article, it is perfectly credible with external links to show it's credibility, as far as I know I haven't broken any guidelines and I am writing about a real person who has news articles written about him. Please consider undeleting this Ben


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.. Protonk (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Template:FSCnom/init and Template:FSCnom/intro
The preload templates for Featured sound candidates nominations, which set up the page and explain how to fill it out. It having been deleted makes creating a featured sound nomination much more difficult.

Deletion reasoning given is patently false, since no other copy of them exist (or, if they do exist, aren't used), and this is the one used by a featured content process. T3 thus doesn't apply.

I presume the deletion was in error, probably confusing them with Template:FPCnom/init. However, Wikipedia handles sounds very differently to pictures. For formatting, they need to use a very specific template with unusual syntax, which, if doene correctly, means they can be coppied directly to WP:FS without need for any tweaking.. An FPC nom will NOT use that template or syntax, and is thus unsuitable.

Further, preload and editing intro header templates cannot accept parameters, so even if the changes were minor (and they aren't at all minor; these are very different content types), it would still be necessary to have separate templates. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC) -Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done T. Canens (talk) 02:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Akonic
Akon -110.36.5.184 (talk) 02:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Akonic, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   10:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Nemerle
This is an academic topic of interest -Jes5199 (talk) 10:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Nemerle, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   10:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growing_self-organizing_map
A quick search through google scholar or the ACM archives reveals that this is a widely used and studied algorithm. This was marked as a COI -- I'm at a loss as to how that would be the case. -Imprecisekludge (talk) 14:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ as a contested prod. I also noticed that the IP editor slapped a shootload of other tags on the article in the same edit so I removed them all. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Playa Fly
Page was deleted because "notabilitity of artist" was not addressed. Playa Fly, born Ibn Young, is one of the most prolific and well respected lyricist of Memphis hip hop in Memphis, TN. A former and original member of Three 6 Mafia, Playa Fly left the group early on to follow a solo career after ownership and recognition disputes. Although lacking mainstream national recognition, Playa Fly is regarded in Memphis as the true voice and spirit of Memphis rap, and is a legendary artist, historian, and teacher. Memphians are proud to announce their love for his blues and soul infused music, his profound and clever lyrics, and his raw and unprecedented style of delivery; he should definitely be included in Wikipedia. Please restore this article. -24.158.181.252 (talk) 20:38, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, in case wishes to nominate it at Articles for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Angelo Zawaydeh
Request to WP:USERFY article until additional references can be found to pass WP:GNG. When article was created I believed that there were sufficient references in reliable sources provided. I, the creator of the article, was away during the PROD process, therefore could not defend it. Furthermore during the AFD process one commenter stated that they believed there were sufficient references from reliable sources, so it has some merit. -RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ - userfied to User:RightCowLeftCoast/Angelo Zawaydeh. Before returning it to the mainspace you must get agreement from user, the admin who closed the AFD, that you have overcome the reasons for deletion, or if he does not agree take it to WP:Deletion review. I must warn you that in my opinion merely piling up more references to the same facts will not achieve notability in Wikipedia's sense - see WP:BOMBARD and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will do my best to find more references to increase the quality of the article so it can mature out back into the main space. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 11:42, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

More deleted Jewish-American mobsters
Harry Strauss, Philip Kovolick and Yasha Katzenberg (a redirect to Jacob Katzenberg) have been deleted in the past few days. These articles were prodded by now-proven sockpuppets. 71.184.39.2 (talk) 10:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ - restored as contested PRODs. JohnCD (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Rati Ram Sharma
Proofs submitted for Albert Schweitzer Prize-1989 & nomination for Nobel Prize-1996 -Rati Ram Sharma (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

I noticed 14 Feb 2011 that my biographical article "Rati Ram Sharma", composed & posted by a friend was deleted in Sepember 2010 due to absence of proofs for my gettng the Albert Schweitzer Prize -1989 and nomintion for a Nobel Prize-1996. These proofs are now given below with the request for restoring the article. Thanks & regards. Rati Ram Sharma, DSc, PhD, MD(MA), MSc, MAMS, FIAMP Professor & Head (retired), Deptt. of Biophysics (with Nuclear Medicine),Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India;Present Res. address: H. No. 615, Sector 10, Panchkula-134113, Haryana, India;Phone: (0091-172)-2563949, Mobile: 9317655775; email:  rrjss615@gmail.com, ; web site:  http://physicsrevolution.com ; link to Natural Philosophy Alliance-profile: http://www.worldsci.org/people/Rati_Ram_Sharma

Further you may visit my website http://www.physicsrevolution.com and NPA profile via link::http://www.worldsci.org/people/Rati_Ram_Sharma

Albert Schweitzer Prize-1989 Established under the Government Parliamentary University Act No. 16 of 1978 THE OPEN INTERNATIONAL UNOVERSITY FOR COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINES (Established as per 1962 World Health Organization Alma Ata Declaration and accorded international recognition to make Alternative Medicines popular and established under the authority of Medicina Alternativa International and recognized as a Deemed University by authority of His Excellency The President of The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, by ref. No,. 196/1 of March 26th, 1968) Recognized by the United Nations as a University by letter of authority No. 35/55/5/XII/80 of August 15th, 1986. CHARTER OF MEDICINA ALTERNATIVA (Alma Ata Declaration 1962) Reply to:28, International Buddhist centre Road, Ref. No. MA/12/89. Colombo 6, Sri Lanka Date : 14th December, 1989. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This is to certify that Prof. Dr. R.R. Sharma, Head, Department of Biophysics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India was awarded the Albert Schweitzer Prize during the 17th World Congress and European Community Symposium of Complementary Medicines held at Amsterdam from 27th to 29th October, 1989. He presided over a scientific session and also presented a paper entitled: "Molecular Biophysics of the Micro Dose". Albert Schweitzer Prize was instituted in 1988 by the Open International University for Complementary Medicines during the World Congress held at Costa-Del-Sol in Spain with unanimous mandate of 330 recognized medical associations from 76 countries as the highest award in Complementary Medicines with a wider scope of recognition of Medicines than the Nobel Prize. It comprises a gold medallion plus an accolade and promotes understanding between people in health and disease. Two prizes,one for research and the other for clinical practices, are awarded yearly. Dr. Sharma was awarded the Albert Schweitzer Prize for elucidating the science of Homoeopathy through his two and a half decades' researches and the book MOLECULAR HOMOEOPATHY. He, for the first time ever in the world, showed by experiments and theory that the dynamization processes of raising potencies induce the diluent medium (lactose, water, alcohol) to acquire the chemical specificity of the initial drug to act as the therapeutic agent and that the homoeopathic dose is not "micro" but contains plenty of the medicinally active diluent molecules. This avoids the perpetual conceptual impasses due to Avogadro's law that potencies higher than the 12th centesimal cannot have any molecule of the initial drug. He has explained all the homoeopathic laws, principles and tenets scientifically. For this he has proposed three new sciences of INDUCTIVE CHEMISTRY, XENOBIOLOGY, INDUCTOXENOPATHY. He has shown that so far Homoeopathy has been regarded as unscientific placebo therapy due to inadequacies of the sciences themselves. He has removed these inadequacies and made the sciences richer with new, bold concepts. He deserves all help and encouragements to take these researches further for the good of the ailing humanity. Signed (Prof. Dr. Sir Anton Jayasuriya) Dean, Clinical Studies The Open International University For Complementary Medicines

Nomination for Nobel Prize in Medicine-1996 Ref. No. MA/02/96 Date 18. 02. 1996 Dear Colleague, Thank you for your excellent thesis on Molecular Homoeopathy. I have sent it to the Nobel Committee. It is with great pleasure I wish to inform you that the Senate of The Open International University for Complementary Medicines affiliated to Medicina Alternativa has decided to confer on you complimentary the accolade of Merit of Excellence for your work at a special ceremony organized at the World Congress of Locomotor Medicines to be held from 27th to 29th December 1996 at The Bandaranaike Memorial Conference Hall, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Delegates from 100 countries have been invited for this conference.…………………………………………………………………. Yours sincerely, Signed. (Lord Pandit Prof. Dr. Sir Anton Jaisuriya)


 * As noted at the top of this page, you may only request undeletion of noncontrovertial deletions. The article in question was deleted due to a community discussion located here.  You will need to visit deletion review to request undeletion.  However, let me advise you that the massive WP:COI that you have, the fact that we do not permit autobiographies, and the biographies of living persons policies will not lead to a decision in your favour. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Casa do Zezinho
I have the rights on the text -GwenBrasil (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

I am from the Casa Do Zezinho organization in Brazil, I own the copyright on this text therefore making it possible for me to post it on wikipedia. Thank you for your time,

Gwenaelle MaitreGwenBrasil (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done. It is not sufficient that you own the copyright to the text.  In order for that text to be used verbatim on Wikipedia the text itself must be released to the public domain.  Simply giving permission for it to be used on wikipedia is not enough because we allow all free content on wikipedia to be reused by any potential downstream user.  If you want to release the text to an appropriate free license, we can tell you how to do so. Protonk (talk) 16:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Washin-Ryu Karate-Do
Article should not have been deleted. This is a style of martial arts that is important. -192.249.47.165 (talk) 17:42, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done as a contested proposed deletion. Protonk (talk) 17:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Cover of 'Never Mind the Balkans, Here's Romania'.jpg
Non-free orphaned image, I was not aware of this. Asked the user that notified me for help, he forwarded me to WP:REFUND. The article will be up in a day, can someone please restore the image? - Thanks, Pim Rijkee (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done. be sure to make the article promptly or it might be tagged again. Protonk (talk) 20:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks Protonk, article is up and running, including cover image. Pim Rijkee (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Sanchin-ryu
User has requested userfication on my userpage (here). Requesting it here on the user's behalf. As I can no longer see the history I have no opinion.''. -Mkativerata (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ to User:Bcecka/Sanchin-ryu. I will give the user some advice about notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

KMess
 This page has been deleted over a month ago because it seen as not notable. However it is still blocked, making it impossible to create a new page which is compliant with the Wikipedia quality standards. -Rubenvd (talk) 20:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. Make a draft in your user space at User:Rubenvd/KMess, as I see you have started to do, and then approach user, the administrator who closed the deletion discussion and protected the title, for permission to post it. If he does not agree, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Memories of a Dying Whore
Notable heavy-metal band -Scottdrink (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Unilateration
The article was relevant, actually I was studying it, yet it has been deleted nevertheless because of a 'Expired PROD'. -200.0.70.254 (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Restored, as a contested proposed deletion.  That article is kind of a mess though.  I don't see any hits for the the title in google apart from wikipedia and wikipedia mirrors and most of the content in the article reads like buzzword laden gobbledygook. Protonk (talk) 21:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Reply! Inc
 Not sure why this was deleted please have someone contact me immediately. cannot get a live person 925-983-3400 ext. 5038 -Replyinc (talk) 18:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The spam notices all over your talkpage were good explanations. I have unfortuntely blocked you for promotional username/spamming.  I have also left you some useful information on your talkpage, and will watch there. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 19:16, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Carvelli
I tried to update the page without knowing the rules and I've made too many changes and was considered spam. In all fairness to the artist, I would like it returned to before I made any changes. It was independently made by a person that had no connection to the artist and had been up for a long time. -Rach Beau (talk) 23:24, 17 February 2011 (UTC) Rach Beau (talk) 23:24, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Carvelli, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. Protonk (talk) 23:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

VAD 43 MRC Klang Chapter
First and foremost, I would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused. I would like to humbly request for the undeletion of the VAD 43 MRC Klang Chapter as it is a reputable social service action team serving actively in its area of supervision. Thus it would be easy for members of the society to get to know social service teams like these. Furthermore, this team is under the supervision of the Malaysian Red Crescent which is a member under the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Members of this group are also above 18 years old in age which shows that they are no influence of schools. I hope my request would be taken into consideration to undelete the above mentioned page. Thank you -Manoj22majin 18:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No need to apologize but no need to undelete anything either as you have already reposted it yourself and already have a backup copy in your user space. With respect to content, we do have an article on the Malaysian Red Crescent Society but would in general not have articles on the individual chapters of such societies. In that sense Wikipedia isn't the best place to inform about your noble cause. Best. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Fwix
1) This company has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works. Please see articles in the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/technology/start-ups/31fwix.html), Forbes (http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/06/new-york-times-news-aggregation-business-media-fwix.html), TechCrunch (http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/03/fwix-geo-index/), and several more. These are considered good sources by many standards. 2) It is not advertising as it describes the company's technology and is not promoting its product. 3) The original submission is neutral - it is not describing the company as superior to other companies, nor does it refer to competitors as inferior. It simply states what the company is attempting to do. 4) There are thousands of other companies (small and large) that are on Wikipedia. -75.101.56.216 (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The admin who deleted that article watches this page, so I'll wait for him to reply, but my recommendation is that restoring the article and adding those sources is the right course of action. Because of the way the article was deleted, I can't unilaterally overturn it but hang tight and the admin in question should weigh in soon. Protonk (talk) 22:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Steve Romanko
There are numerous sources available online attesting to the legitimacy of the article, one example, Steve Romanko is listed on IMDB.com which checks information for accuracy -97.65.178.2 (talk) 02:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * IMDB is not a sufficient source for biographical entries. Protonk (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * And many people in the IMDb, like myself, are not notable. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Still, it is an expired PROD. Unless it's an entirely unsourced WP:BLP, I'd suggest it should be restored (and perhaps sent directly to WP:AFD of course).
 * I'm hesitant to restore a PROD that mentions BLP concerns in the deletion summary because of the somewhat fuzzy scope of Proposed deletion of biographies of living people. But if you want I'll restore it. Protonk (talk) 23:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't see it and I didn't notice the BLP note. If the IP is willing to try to source it, I'll help and would like it restored (unless you see a serious and unfixable BLP problem of course).  If he/she doesn't return, I see no problem in letting it go... Hobit (talk) 05:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0738843/ There are 51 entries of work in IMDB. http://www.academyart.edu/film-school/mfa_faculty.html is listed as MFA and BFA Film Faculty. http://www.horrorsociety.com/2009/01/04/new-zombie-film-the-hell-patrol/ .  http://cargocollective.com/13thgenerationfilms film production company site (under construction).  http://vimeo.com/channels/13thgen Production company video site.  http://www.zombierama.com/brainwaves/hellpatrolinterview.html Interview in Zombierama online zine.  http://insidepulse.com/2010/09/26/the-hell-patrol-dvd-review/ review of a title produced by Steve Romanko. http://www.revenantmagazine.com/HellPatrolinterview.htm interview in Revenant magazine.
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. The unsourced-BLP concern was about a fairly irrelevant "early life" paragraph. As this was written by user it was probably autobiography, but we can't know that; however IMO it was not contentious enough to need rev-deleting, so I have restored the article and removed that paragraph, leaving a stub that can be built on. JohnCD (talk) 22:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I've put in the sources I can find. We do need some actual coverage of the man in reliable sources.  Please ask me for help on my talk page if desired.  I've added some poor-ish sources to the article, but it won't be enough to prevent the article from being deleted (and I'll nominate the article myself for deletion if we don't seem able to improve it...) Hobit (talk) 02:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File:GVHS.jpg
reasoning -Route11 (talk) 01:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ This was deleted as a copyright violation F9 with incorrect author and license information. It ultimately is replaceable fair use - anyone with a camera can take a picture of the school.  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File:GrandValleyHighSchool.jpg
reasoning -Route11 (talk) 01:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ This was deleted as a copyright violation F9 with incorrect author and license information. It ultimately is replaceable fair use - anyone with a camera can take a picture of the school.  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

LiveYourLifeMag
The article served to show a different type of online men's magazine and describe it's content. -Jjttaa123 (talk) 02:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chips_%27n_Bits_Magazine&action=edit&redlink=1
The Magazine was started in the Early nineties and was about BBS'ing in Australia. It was the only magazine to devote itself uniquely to BBS, FIDO-Net and eventually the Internet in Australia. According to Gordon and Gotch, the publications distributors, up to issue 8, it was a complete sell-out. The original was deleted by a USA based college student who having grown up with the Internet obviously had no understanding of how rare and unusual early BBS users were.-Tomkoltai (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ as a contested prod but you need to add sources as it won't otherwise survive if someone takes it to a deletion discussion. Spartaz Humbug! 06:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Ajl772NonWikiExample.JPG
 It is part of some documentation that is stored on my user page. User:DASHBot orphaned it by editing the image out of the documentation. Afterwards, User:DASHBot marked it for deletion. For more info, see User talk:Ajl772/Archives/2010/September

-Ajl772 02:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It is just some HTML in a text editor. I assume it was non free because the text editor was proprietary.  If that was the case it doesn't belong in userspace.  Either way I can't really see the utility of the image. Protonk (talk) 03:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to send the image to me via email, so I can decide if I really want to keep it? Ajl772 03:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * And I'm not sure what you mean by "it doesn't belong in userspace". What doesn't belong? Ajl772 03:54, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * When you take a screenshot of a non free program that screenshot may include copyrighted images (logos, images, etc.) so in an abundance of caution for downstream use our non-free content policy basically forces us to declare most screenshots of non free software as "non free". It is the non-free image itself that doesn't belong in userspace.  I'm not sure as to where our guidelines on screenshots are, probably someplace like WP:SCREENSHOT or something.  it would be pretty trivial to edit the picture tom just include the instructive part ofmthe image or use some Free (that's with a capital F) text editor.  As for the image itself, it isn't hurting anything.  I'll just restore it and you can look at it on wikipedia.  When you ae done you can ask to have it deleted again, modify it, or simply leave it alone and it will be deleted automatically after a period of time. Protonk (talk) 05:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I have edited it and re-uploaded it. Would you mind taking a look at it to see what changes (if any) I would need to make to the copyright information, or direct me to someone who can help with that? Ajl772 17:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Strikeland Brotherhood Sisterhood
I am one of the founders of strikeland brotherhood sisterhood, i want to add this article in your wikipedia. -Strikelandbsi (talk) 12:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning organisations. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning organisations will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I also recommend you read the guidelines regarding conflicts of interests before writing an article about an organisation you are significantly involved with. Thryduulf (talk) 17:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * As a bit of a clarification, it wasn't deleted for not meeting the requirements of WP:ORG, it was deleted for "not asserting notability". If you can fix the article and explain why the organization is notable, please do so.  But be aware that if it doesn't meet the requirements of WP:ORG it will just get deleted again. You can contact me on my talk page if you have questions. But please do read WP:COI and WP:ORG as well as WP:RS first.  Even if they don't make sense the first time through, reading them will help...Hobit (talk) 02:46, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * As a bit of further clarification, I referred to not meeting WP:ORG as a reason for not restoring the page whilst pointing out to Strikelandbsi on their user talk page that they have a copy in that pages history as well as COI and possible issues with a role account. After a request here has been handled, the requesters' talk page is often the better place to offer help and the like.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Hobit (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Efterskole
The said page has been deleted on February 7 under the G12 criterion. However, there is the OTRS ticket #2011020310008453 which has been received on February 3 and which comes from the domain mentioned in the deletion. Not being an admin I can't see if the page doesn't meet the other deletion criteria but I feel it should be undeleted with the OTRS template placed on its talk page. Thanks, -odder (talk) 02:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment, the article was first deleted as G12 copyright violation on 2nd February, and then an identical copy deleted on 7 February, again as G12. I've had a look at the content, and while it needs work to make it encyclopaedic in style this would be possible and it doesn't appear to meet any other speedy deletion criteria. I'm not OTRS enabled so I cannot view the ticket nor therefore comment on the applicability of the G12 in light of it. I'm not 100% sure from your comment whether you are saying that the OTRS ticket gives the appropriate release(s) or not, so I am erring on the side of caution and not undeleting it at this moment. I have no objections to it being undeleted if the ticket does make G12 a non-issue, and will do so if you clarify to this effect (and nobody gets there before me!). Thryduulf (talk) 03:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The OTRS ticket is valid so I have undeleted this. Odder, are you able to sort out the tags for the released text? Spartaz Humbug! 03:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, sorry for not answering so long — it was due to timezone differences. I have already added ConfirmationOTRS template to the article's talk page and am about to reply to the copyright owner and close the said ticket. I hope you can wikify the article a bit. Cheers, odder (talk) 12:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

John Westin
Page was deleted on January 19th, but has been recreated by another editor. Please restore edit history for this recently deleted/restored article. -Dolovis (talk) 14:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. Please add to the article some reference to show that he actually has made his debut for Elitserien - even the new article says only that he would make it on February 19. JohnCD (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Juan Castillo (filmmaker)
article was deleted maliciously, as the information featured in this page is verifiable through a simple web search -Elba2323 (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ The article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Juan Castillo (filmmaker) so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you think the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should first approach user, the administrator who closed the discussion. Then, if you are not happy, you can go to WP:Deletion review. Please read WP:Assume good faith; your case will not be helped by throwing around accusations of malice. JohnCD (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Zoroastrian MC
Motorcycle club Started in 1991 as a member of the Zoroastrian Brotherhood. Originally in Minnesota the club has expanded worldwide. Zoroastrian MC are involved in yearly community events. They promote regular toydrives in Chicago and Las Vegas to help underpriveleged children during the holidays. Zoroastrian MC also supports all cummunity activities that help the homless and financially distressed members of their areas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wordmassa (talk • contribs)
 * ❌ Sorry but this was deleted under CSD A7. You'll have to discuss this with the deleting admin. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Brandon Hunt
Brandon Hunt is a King of the Cage Champion. His record and history is important to the MMA project. -Koten (talk) 00:49, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ as a contested PROD. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Jimmie Rivera
The article was deleted because Jimmie Rivera was not considered an important person. He has since won the KOTC Flyweight Championship making him an important part of the MMA project. -Koten (talk) 00:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ Sorry, no can do for this one as it was deleted under CSD A7 but you are free to create a new version that properly asserts his importance or significance. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Chiya Abramowitz
reasoning -Chaninamaccabeatlover (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Lambert Road Baptist Church
I don't believe that this page should have been deleted. The administrator said that this church is not significant, but in South Africa it has significance in being over 100 years old. Please review this deletion -41.146.165.242 (talk) 09:48, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I've also restored the logo. It is still possible that someone brings it to a deletion discssion. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Gary J. Aguirre
 T:TDYK refers. Okay, this is somewhat strange. This article has been G7-ed, and if I understand this right it is due to some sort of outing of the subject's email address. I hope I am in the right place to ask: Can the content somehow be restored WITHOUT reinstating that information (e.g. per copy-paste)? Article already got a DYK tick, I thought it might be a pity to lose it. -Pgallert (talk) 12:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Seems to have been restored already. Protonk (talk) 21:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Mikk Reintam
The page was deleted, but I had no time to have a copy of the article. Please provide me a copy. Thanks. -Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request., prod nom notified. l'aquatique  [talk]  16:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

James Severn
Now meets WP:NFOOTY (which it failed here, as he has now appeared in a senior football match "46:11 Substitution James Severn joins the action as a substitute, replacing Stephen Bywater." http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_1/9402074.stm -CumbrianRam (talk) 20:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * the AfD was relatively recent, so I don't want to overturn it by myself, but I will leave a note with the deleting admin. Protonk (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I was the closing admin there--No objections to undeletion, the provided source indicates that the primary rationale for deletion provided during the discussion is no longer valid. Thanks for the note! CumbrainRam, would you make sure that ref gets added to the article?  I'd really appreciate that. (PS:  I recognize that this is a bit out of process, as that was an AfD not a PROD, but I don't think this undeletion will be controversial, and I'll accept the trouting if I'm wrong.)  Cheers,  --j &#9883; e deckertalk to me 22:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No problems from my end. I just left you a note so you could weight in or undelete it yourself!  Thanks for the quick response. Protonk (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as the consensus reason for deletion is no longer valid, as closing admin, the article has been restored on request. --j &#9883; e deckertalk to me 22:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Padmashri P.R.Krishnakumar
absolutely verifiable facts written about subject -Vaidyahema (talk) 04:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done. The article was deleted because it failed to indicate the significance of the subject but it could have easily been deleted as an advertisement for its subject. Protonk (talk) 04:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

COL Richard T. Curry
reasoning -Bengal40 (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

COL Richard T. Curry is a very historical figure in resent Ohio Military History, having been the only Ohio National Guard Officer to deploy both a Cavalry Battalion and Infantry Brigade Combat Team to Iraq during OIF. The 37th IBCT deployment was the largest since WWII making it historically significant and him being the commander very relevant to Ohio history. I can not think of a better place to store this historical information for future use and research than Wikipedia. Please reconsider and restore the current artical to an active site. Thank you for your consideration. Bengal40 (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done This has been addressed before here. Protonk (talk) 04:29, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Padmashri P. R. Krishnakumar
this is a valid article that can be completely backed up factually by many news articles on the subject in question and should be firmly reinstated ASAP. He is a very well known proponent of Indian Medical Science,culture,philosophy ,philanthropist,and has been recognized and honored by the Government of India for his services to the field. -Vaidyahema (talk) 05:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * You already posted about this two threads up and received an answer. You don't need this content undeleted. Instead, go write a neutrally-worded article that cites independent, published reliable sources that discuss this subject in detail and the article will not be deleted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_schools_in_India
The information of School Ranking of india is sought after by many parents who are looking for top schools in India. The content provides such ranking based on survey -59.160.165.58 (talk) 12:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px|link=|alt=]] N Not done This page is only for article that have been deleted and deleted on an uncontroversial basis. The article you are here about has not yet been deleted so this page has no applicability whatever to it, and if it is deleted through the AfD process it could not be undeleted here in any event.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Antal International
reasoning I was not aware of the limit on submitting an article - so once I had followed the advice given and submitted a final version, it got deleted for being repeatedly recreated, if the final edit it acceptable, please could the deletion be put back

-GraemeRead (talk) 15:32, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The page's deletion was not on the basis that it was repeatedly recreated. Your last version, like the one before it, was deleted under CSD G11 as found by the deleting administrator to be unambiguous advertising or promotion. The title was protected from recreation after that deletion, because it had been repeatedly recreated. Whether or not I agree with deletion on the basis stated, or the length of protection, the page will not be undeleted through this page as this page is only for undeletion of content on very specific uncontroversial undeletion bases, such as pages deleted under CSD G6 as "housekeeping", and expired prods. Please see the top of this page where this is discussed. I suggest you contact the administrator who both deleted and protected the title against recreation at his talk page: User talk:Lectonar. If that is unavailing you do have the option of seeking unprotection at Requests for page protection to then seek to repost, though I suggest you work up a better, less promotional and better developed version of the article in a subpage before you do so. You can also seek the have the deletion itself overturned at Deletion review, though this will only occur if it is found that the article pretty clearly did not meet the criteria it was deleted under.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

oswald lange
we wrote the obituary -Opa1912 (talk) 23:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC) Isent a message to
 * The fact that you assert you wrote the material is not enough to avoid deletion because we can't simply take an anonymous person's assertion that it is so. In fact, even if we knew you had written it, we would need more from you to use it—you would need to release the content into the public domain or under a free license, not just give us permission to use it. So, you need to show us you own the copyright in a verifiable way and release the copyright. Instructions for this can be found at Donating copyrighted materials. By the way, the article did not cite to any reliable sources to verify its information content, which is necessary..--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:05, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

DaveighC.jpg
the pic I uploaded was deleted fast by wiki for no reason -Clarisse21 (talk) 03:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done. The image was deleted as a copyright violation on Wikipedia Commons.  You can see the deletion log here.  Wikipedia and Commons are supported by the same organization but we have no power to reverse their editorial decisions here.  I would suggest you request undeletion there but it appears to be a copyvio so they are unlikely to grant such a request. Protonk (talk) 04:08, 24 February 2011 (UTC)