Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 322

Draft:David_Lock
''I, Dclock99, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Dclock99 (talk) 23:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:20, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Hartlepool United FC.png
Is there any chance (way?) of restoring File:Hartlepool United FC.png as I want to include it back in the history of the Hartlepool F.C. page? It is pretty central to the article. I can add/amend to a valid rationale too if need be Abcmaxx (talk) 23:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done use it or lose it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Ranjeet S Mudholkar
114.143.216.187 (talk) 13:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Charles Lewis Camp
''I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Abyssal (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:19, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Azmi Haq (2)
Azmi Haq be undeleted based on the fact that he is a prominent Pakistani actor and political figure. You also checked the notability guidelines for people and he meets that criteria based on the cult following his television dramas have in Pakistan and the fact that he is often taped by media for political commentary. I had previously submitted the request to your kind office and the page was undeleted, but now when we checked again, it's again deleted. Kindly undelete it at the earliest as all the facts are truly presented. You can check his current activity on his website i.e www.saloncamden.com

If there is any information required to undelete this page, we will be happy to assist you.

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shah.azeem.naqvi (talk • contribs) 06:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Who is "we"?
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Azmi Haq (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The only reason this page was undeleted last time was because the AfD that led to its deletion had low participation. That isn't the case this time. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 18:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Levi Grangeiro Silva
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Levygs (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. article drafts in the English Wikipedia need to be in English. Try the Portuguese Wikipedia.  Hut 8.5  21:55, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Mark Yale Harris
''I, Artworkintl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Artworkintl (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.  Hut 8.5  21:57, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:openHAB
Hi, could you please restore Draft:openHAB to my user discussion page or send me the wiki source code via e-mail? I'd like to save the wiki source and work on it maybe in other Wikis. Maybe also some minor parts can be used later on for a new proposal. Thanks, Eff0ktiv (talk) 20:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I've sent you an email with the contents.  Hut 8.5  22:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I've sent this again as you requested.  Hut 8.5  19:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Now I have it, thank you! Eff0ktiv (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Lucidchart
The deleted page was an overview of Lucidchart. Lucidchart is a cloud-based flowchart and diagraming software. The reason for deletion was originally stated as "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". The intent of the article was not promotional in nature. —66.60.102.226 (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator . Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. It doesn't matter what the intent was; if the text of the article was noticeably biased in its favour then G11 applies. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 23:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmm... I'm kinda disturbed that the article has a long history with many contributors. Generally I'm hesitant to speedy-delete those, although I have on occasion. when you tagged this with G11, did you see anything salvageable? ~Anachronist (talk) 16:28, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I know what you mean and I hate tagging something with that many edits. But no, I found only promospam. It sometimes comes to pass that promocruft exists for years before being caught. Also, I cannot see into the heart of the article's creator. They might honestly not know the difference between encyclopedic and promotional writing. It also sometimes comes about that said content is passed over in hopes that someone might improve it. I see an edit summary from 2016, "again, cited solely to the product website - not encyclopedic info".-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 17:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Looking at older revisions in the deleted history, I agree that while it isn't blatantly promotional in tone, the points emphasized and the citations make it come off like a product brochure, making it seem like the intent was to use Wikipedia as a publicity platform. I recommend the requester create an account, disclose any association with Lucid Chart, and start over in draft space, submitting it for review via WP:AFC. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

I thought it seemed like a notable topic, so I spent a bit of time to draft a new version, from scratch. I do not consider my version to be promotional.
 * update

I request the revisions from the prior version be restored. Geo Swan (talk) 01:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

2nd The Seoul Awards
The page was created by a blocked user, however i believe the topic has notability and i would like to improve on the content and citations if it is restored. —43.239.79.36 (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * . All of the information in the deleted article is already in the main article The Seoul Awards (but organized differently). I suggest you improve on that article instead. I am skeptical that the second occurrence has sufficient notability all on its own to justify a stand-alone article separate from the main topic. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Cycling Without Age
Article was speedily deleted under article G12. Indeed, the first version of the article was created with an entire paragraph lifted from the organisation's website, triggering the speedy delete. This was done by a novice user, and I attempted to save the article by re-writing it in its entirety. I published this new version of the article, which was free from any copyright violation, and I posted in the Talk page. However, it looks like I must not have followed the correct procedure in contesting the deletion, as the page is gone - along with my completely rewritten version. Are you able to undelete and/or review my version? Or can it be userified? I would rather not start from scratch. Thank you — RadishSlice talk 00:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Mobispine
Deleted following PROD however Special:Log shows previous log PROD and should have been declined. Deleting admin ignoring request but talk page indicates will not deal with exPRODs. Probably not unreasonable to pathway straight to AfD. Thankyou. —Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC) Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Wesley J. Hall
''I, Canucks111, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Canucks111 (talk) 17:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

MarketMuse
''I, Akibalogh, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Akibalogh (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Vijayanathan Dhaharasen
Tash18 (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Teri Raza
It was deleted and reason was to make way for another, but no any article was made since then. I am requesting to undelete please as it was second name of notable series Shehryar Shehzadi —122.8.18.186 (talk) 12:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, redirect restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Samuel Havelock Jr.
''I, 216.236.170.228, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 216.236.170.228 (talk) 14:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

INeedSupport/sandbox
I've been thinking of creating a couple of articles. Thus, I wanted to revive my sandbox so I can work on that. I previously asked my sandbox for deletion because I have no thought on creating an article. Thanks —INeedSupport(Care free to give me support?) 02:40, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There wasn't anything there but a sandbox template. You could have recreated the page. In any case I have restored it. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh okay then. Thanks for the undeletion nevertheless! INeedSupport(Care free to give me support?) 14:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Wendy Torrance
''I, Erik, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 16:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sophia Vari
''I, 208.104.148.220, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 208.104.148.220 (talk) 16:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

''I, 208.104.148.220, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 208.104.148.220 (talk) 18:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Ethics of animal research
I am asking that this page be undeleted on the premises that the conditions it was deleted were inaccurate. It was deleted under section A10 (for the criteria of a speedy deletion): "This applies to any recently created article with no relevant page history that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia topic, and that does not expand upon, detail or improve information within any existing article(s) on the subject, and where the title is not a plausible redirect." I believe that the article I submitted greatly expanded on the philosophical debates surrounding the ethics of animal testing. I went into sufficient detail only from the philosophical side with plenty of references to show that this is a stem of ethics within the philosophical community. When the article was deleted under A10 I was redirected to "Animal Testing #ethics" which only offers a few sentences on the viewpoints of a few philosophers (and only ones against animal testing) and the rest about different types of experimentation and animals that were used that sparked protest- a different angle to the one that i provided; which focused purely on going into depth on the philosophical moral arguments. I believe at minimum that the content i provided would have fit under content to be merged: "This does not include split pages or any article that expands or reorganizes an existing one or that contains referenced, merge able material. It also does not include disambiguation pages." I also want to express my disappointment upon going to the lengths to research appropriate philosophical content for this article only for it to be quickly deleted without discussion or any formal deletion process. I am a relatively new writer to wikipedia having this process formally overlooked by my university. I have taken special care not to do any of the above reasons for which my article was deleted.--ExistentialMariachi (talk) 23:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC) —ExistentialMariachi (talk) 23:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


 * given the reason for deletion you'll need to use WP:DRV to request restoration of this. Personally I don't think this deletion was valid and I'll support overturning it if you post something there.  Hut 8.5  06:41, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree. would you object to restoring the history rather than going to DRV? Also pinging  who nominated it as A10. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't object to restoring it to draft space, and the content carefully integrated into the articles where this content is already well-covered. This is a very typical student editing thing, where articles are plopped into WP without regard to content elsewhere that has been intensively worked on and debated. I believe user:Tryptofish has worked a lot on content in this area and could provide clueful insight (not being an admin, they can't see the content, of course) Jytdog (talk) 14:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * User:ExistentialMariachi -- what class are you in? You don't link to it anywhere.  (Given that you posted a request for [peer review, I am guessing it is OLES 2129 that we have been discussing at EDUP [[Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard#OLES2129|here]], but I am not sure)  Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 15:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I see, you restored the history and then protected it so it can't be made live again. That makes sense. Jytdog (talk) 18:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping. I have no particular opinion about the deletion, although taking it to draft space sounds like a good idea. The main issue I would point out from past experience is that the subject area has historically attracted a lot of opinion pushing, sometimes with an anti-science, pro-animal rights, POV. Obviously, that needs to be avoided here. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:07, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Laura Petela
I see no reason why the article was deleted after being published for many years. Just because the subject is a former child actress does not make her less worthy of an article. She starred in a major UK tv series based on the works of Enid Blyton (The Famous Five) which has a cult following. The page has proved useful to fans of the series to find out what she is currently doing —13ten (talk) 23:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 00:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Yvan Forclaz
''I, Toldo83, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Toldo83 (talk) 03:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Cum Town
Was deleted for being a "patreon funded meme podcast with no 3rd party coverage." While it's true the podcast is patreon-funded, that alone is not reason for deletion. The podcast did in fact receive third party coverage--such as from reliable sources such as Vox and The Guardian. This is a popular podcast with a very large fan base and is certainly relevant. —ModerateMike729 (talk) 02:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Cum Town, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. You could write a draft using good references, as the deleted article had flimsy reference with either minimal content or not independnet, connected to the topic.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:29, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I can spare you the first step. I am confident in my close, and have no intention of reversing it. bd2412  T 11:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Steven Boyle Freemason
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Centurio1612 (talk) 19:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Just edit the page to reset the G13 clock. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 20:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

hubzilla
This page should not be speedily deleted because even if the Fediverse services are still in development and small, there are reasonable chance that they will grow following the path of Mastodon, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastodon_(software). They are listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_software_and_protocols_for_distributed_social_networking and deserve a proper page. It's also listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub/. I'm not linked by any means with the service in question, it's not marketing or other bullshit :) Could you revert the deletion? Thanks for your attention. —Crickxson (talk) 14:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello! My name is Cryptic and I'll be your decliner today.X mark.svg Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.Succintly, this and your two following requests were indistinguishable from marketing or other bullshit; and, just like the big box at the top of the screen told you when you edited this page, they won't be undeleted here. —Cryptic 15:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

pixelfed
This page should not be speedily deleted because even if the Fediverse services are still in development and small, there are reasonable chance that they will grow following the path of Mastodon, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastodon_(software). They are listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_software_and_protocols_for_distributed_social_networking and deserve a proper page. It's also listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub/. I'm not linked by any means with the service in question, it's not marketing or other bullshit :) Could you revert the deletion? Thanks for your attention. —Crickxson (talk) 14:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. —Cryptic 15:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Pleroma
This page should not be speedily deleted because even if the Fediverse services are still in development and small, there are reasonable chance that they will grow following the path of Mastodon, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastodon_(software). They are listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_software_and_protocols_for_distributed_social_networking and deserve a proper page. It's also listed on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub/. I'm not linked by any means with the service in question, it's not marketing or other bullshit :) Could you revert the deletion? Thanks for your attention. —Crickxson (talk) 14:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. —Cryptic 15:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Roelof Jan Minneboo
''I, Rminneboo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Rminneboo (talk) 08:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Roelof Jan Minneboo is a Dutch screenwriter, known for Corn Island, The Gentle Indifference of the World and My Foolish Heart.
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —Cryptic 15:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Family Plastics
A page on Family Plastics was earlier in wikipedia and it got deleted. The recent fire accident happened in the same company has given the numero uno plastic products manufactures of Kerala has made the company 'notable' in India that has 'unfortunately' faced a loss of 500 crores. 122.164.180.205 (talk) 15:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)         —122.164.180.205 (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Wikipedia uses a stricter definition of "notability" than you are in this request. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 18:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

"Churari"
''I, Prashantfromchurari, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Prashantfromchurari (talk) 02:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

I wish to continue editing the post and follow my passion providing the authorized information "Publish changes" button below —Prashantfromchurari (talk) 02:03, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ (see Draft:Churari); but we need solid sources, better grammar, and a neutral point of view. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  02:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Nic Fanciulli
As per WP:N This DJ is still quite notable. The artist is still releasing material and has articles about him on Google News. —Angryskies (talk) 17:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * "articles about him on Google News" don't confer notability on a subject. We need actual sources that provide significant coverage. According to Articles for deletion/Nic Fanciulli there are insufficient sources to merit an article. If that situation has changed, you can contact the administrator who deleted it. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:52, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo of KCMH Chula.png
File was originally tagged as fair-use and previous version was deleted by RonBot under F5, but it should easily be PD-textlogo. —Paul_012 (talk) 07:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

BGC - Brand-Generated Content
''I, Sociallybuzz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Sociallybuzz (talk) 11:39, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You should also change your username as Sociallybuzz is an organisation name. You must have a user name for a person, eg Andre Kay, but not the company they work for. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:The Great Roo Incident of 2016
''I, HoLeeFook, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' HoLeeFook (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

User:TheUltamateBoss3900
If the Page is speedy deleted I won't be able to edit or create articles —TheUltamateBoss3900 (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That makes no sense what-so-ever. You don't need a userpage to be able to edit or create articles. —Jeremy v^_^v  Bori! 22:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


 * In any case the U5 delete nomination has been withdrawn, and we won't be deleting that userpage, so there is nothing to do here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Interstate 174 in Iowa
Interstate 174 was a proposed Interstate Highway in Iowa and Illinois. It is not a cross-namespace redirect. —Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 05:12, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It was a redirect to Talk:Interstate 280 (Iowa–Illinois) which was cross-space. It never had content. Does it make sense to redirect to Interstate 280 (Iowa–Illinois)? If so then create it that way. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I must have accidentally redirected it to the talk page, instead of the actual page. Thank you for bringing that to my attention. The deletion notice should have been clearer. Also, it shouldn't have been deleted without being nominated to the Redirects for discussion page. I will remake this redirect. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

User:Jason Rees/Atlantic retirees
the page served as copyright attribution for Talk:List of retired Atlantic hurricane names and should never have been deleted.2001:A61:492:BC00:2507:E75C:1C33:57AA (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC) —2001:A61:492:BC00:2507:E75C:1C33:57AA (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The edit history is still present in the article; Rees deleted the old draft from his sandbox. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  23:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That's wrong. Part of the old draft was edited in by copy and paste; and as such the entire history of the old draft with all its contributions has to be preserved visibly.2001:A61:492:BC00:2507:E75C:1C33:57AA (talk) 00:43, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft: Ellen Nisbeth
''I, Wekuethe, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Wekuethe (talk) 14:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says . —Cryptic 22:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:RSX-180
''I, 193.191.6.250, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 193.191.6.250 (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —Cryptic 22:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Khalifa International Stadium.jpg
The previous image used for the Khalifa International Stadium article has been as a freedom of panorama case. Images of the stadium are not free works under Qatari law, and this non-free image with a well-written rationale for its use, was the satisfactory image used for the lead image of the article. —– PhilipTerryGraham (talk &middot;&#32;articles &middot;&#32;reviews) 23:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * In this case the image is replaceable by a free-er version that may infringe on Qatar FOP law but not US law. Such an image could be hosted here on Wikipedia. You can still ask the deleting admin user talk:Explicit for reconsideration. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest asking a Commons admin for a copy of the file on Commons so it can be uploaded as NFC here. —Cryptic 22:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

International Public Health Film Competition
I acknowledge the copyright issues regarding the last version of this page and have made significant alterations to the wording of the page to address these comments. However I think that the International Public Health Film Competition is still notable in its own right and deserves to have a page separately from the Public Health Film Festival —Uthoang (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done. This process does not restore articles deleted at AFD. I see you've already made your way to the right place. —Cryptic 22:35, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

User:Barbara (WVS)/Recognition
Restoration requested to rework and add content to the page. I would rather have the content sent to me by email so that it doesn't appear that I am pushing the limits of my topic ban. If that isn't possible, I will ask another user if they would allow the recreation of this user page as a draft in their user space.—   Barbara    ✐  ✉  16:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Mailed. —Cryptic 22:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I deeply appreciate your help. Best Regards,   Barbara    ✐  ✉  00:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:BitMitigate
''I, Tisafa, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Tisafa (talk) 08:40, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Azmi Haq (3)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Shah.azeem.naqvi (talk) 08:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi,

Hope you are fine and in goo spirits.

I request Azmi Haq be undeleted based on the fact that he is a prominent Pakistani actor and political figure. You also checked the notability guidelines for people and he meets that criteria based on the cult following his television dramas have in Pakistan and the fact that he is often taped by media for political commentary.

Looking forward for the undeletion of this page.

Kind Regards, Shah Azeem Naqvi
 * X mark.svg Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Azmi Haq (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. I cheerfully undeleted this a couple of months ago, but another AFD debate was conclusive. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Clare Cunningham (musician)
''I, Clare Cunningham, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Clare Cunningham (talk) 08:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Clare Cunningham (musician) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Side Dish (band)
''I, Burtmacklin31, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Burtmacklin31 (talk) 15:12, 6 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

kc da beatmonster
Kcdabeatmonster (talk) 13:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC) how do i get one of you guys to edit a page for me im a music producer from atlanta. ga and i have worked with alot of celebirties and want people to be able to know who i am please contact me at


 * A page about this is at User:Kcdabeatmonster/Kc da beatmonster. Please read WP:Autobiography. Wikipedia is not for advertising. If your work gets written up in misic magazines or newspapers, or some books are published about you, then there will be material to use to write an article. https://www.hiphopcanada.com/550-masquerade-video/ has a mention of kc da beatmonster, but it is merely a mention and nothing to write an article about. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:The Plug Entertainment
This talk page was mistakenly deleted due to messy page moves. After restoring, the page should then be moved to Draft talk:The Plug Entertainment. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:03, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Restored and moved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Sora Choi
By now, Choi has enough of her own notability and reliable sources to have a page that doesn’t redirect to Korea’s Next Top Model. Normally I would do it manually, but since there’s an abandoned draft I can fix that to Wikipedian standards. Trillfendi (talk) 06:31, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Sora Choi Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

User:PorkchopGMX/userpage
In March 2018, i made some edits to this page and it was deleted for speedy deletion requested by me. While this is my userpage, I want the other revisions to be restored, and if you can’t find any on that page look on User:PorkchopGMX872 instead. Thank you! PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 03:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC) —PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with  four tildes!) 03:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The user page User:PorkchopGMX872 was moved to User:Porkchop Sr. and the userpage was moved to User:PorkchopGMX/userpage.css. It appears that only redirects have been deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Look at the deleted edits on both pages, I think there’s still some edits there. I’m pretty sure it’s PorkchopGMX872. PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 07:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * What I’m talking about is Teahouse/Questions/Archive_733. In this case, PorkchopGMX2 is me and PorkchopGMX is PorkchopGMX872. After being notified that my ttt subpage is a case of WP:NOT, I for some reason tagged the ttt with U5 CSD. And then User:PorkchopGMX872 (User:PorkchopGMX at the time) got deleted. Hope this helps. PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 07:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Well it looks like that you have to look at the logs of just User:PorkchopGMX (as target). On March 7, the page was deleted. Could you restore those revisions from that time? PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 07:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * See here. PorkchopGMX (Sign your posts with four tildes!) 07:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * OK there is some content prior to the redirect, written by user:PorkchopGMX872 Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi, welcome to my Wikipedia account. I have been editing Wikipedia using multiple IP addresses before creating this account and have been interested about Wikipedia

My YouTube channel is at http://mygmx.ga if you are interested.

Have a good day!

(List of subpages is located here)

File:Yalghar.jpg
It was deleted per f5 but was connected to Yalghaar, actually some unexperienced editor by mistake removes it from article and after seven days it was deleted assuming orphaned. Please undelete it —119.160.118.67 (talk) 12:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:WorkPuls
''I, SFilip, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' SFilip (talk) 14:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Marloes Horst
A 2 second Wikipedia search can show you just how notable she is without even having an article, as a cover girl and as a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit model by itself. Anyway, there are more than enough reliable sources out there to verify her notability in other areas. Someone just didn’t do their due dilligence. I can fix this page. Trillfendi (talk) 15:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Harrison Williams
CHCDigital (talk) 15:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * ( Non-administrator comment ) Article subject is the founder of CHC Digital. Username has been reported to WP:UAA. --Finngall <sup style="color: #D4A017;">talk  15:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Trance Fury - deletion recovery
I would like to respectfully request the undeletion/recovery of the Trance Fury article. I believe it was rather quickly deleted and needs to be edited to help cite additional sources. It is a valid artist who needs a little cleanup and is working with a Grammy nominated engineer on his upcoming album. Thank you for your time. —Fury88 (talk) 16:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Kelly Mittendorf
Even though model is mostly retired, her career certainly has notability and there are many reliable sources such as Vogue and New York Times to prove that. Page was previous deleted as A7 and someone said it read like an advertisement but I can easily fix that. —Trillfendi (talk) 19:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Campbell Grant
''I, Thmazing, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' Thmazing (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Just as a note, this page was deleted just a few hours after I was warned it might be. I never had a chance to do anything about it. Thmazing (talk) 22:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please add some sources to get this to main space standard! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:36, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Thmazing (talk) 21:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

2019 NBA draft
''I, 68.103.78.155, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' 68.103.78.155 (talk) 22:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G7, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —Cryptic 22:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Mariah Parker, aka Lingua Franca
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —47.32.76.76 (talk) 01:38, 8 November 2018 (UTC) 1= Mariah Parker 2= She is a public figure. She is a County Commissioner. She is an activist. She is a rapper. She has an album.
 * [[Image:Symbol note.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. None of what you listed meets WP:Notability, WP:Notability (people), WP:NPOL, or WP:NMUSIC. This also confirms to me the request above is indeed related to that AfD discussion, which precludes it being undeleted here. —<i style="color: #228B22;">Jeremy</i> v^_^v  Bori! 01:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Projector_EOD_L5_A1_(Baldrick)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Cepmenderer (talk) 00:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

I thought that I had already published this page. I would like to review and publish it now.
 * Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)