Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 38

Lindeneau_Elementary_School
Undelete to userspace so I can use my article on the schools official website. I will then delete again -Dstryker (talk) 18:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Dstryker/Lindeneau Elementary School. Just tag it with db-u1 once done. I've also created a redirect in place.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Undelete Mike Bloom (Musician) page
I believe Mike's Bloom's page may have been taken down in error. I am doing research on Mike Bloom for his upcoming solo album release, as well as the release of the third Elected album. I see his page has been 'redirected' to The Elected page. I have used his Wikipedia page in the past and know it to be factual, so I am surprised it seems to be deleted. Please 'undelete' his page so I can use Wikipedia as a source for the article.

Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bljoe (talk • contribs) 20:29, 11 May 2011
 * ❌ - see WP:REFUND further up this page. However, you can see the content that was on the page, for your article, like this: click on Mike Bloom (musician) and you will be taken to "The Elected." At the top of that page, just under the title, it will say "(Redirected from Mike Bloom (musician))". Click on that link and you will get to the redirect page. Now click on "View history" at the top, and on the resulting history page click on "23:19, 7 April 2011" at the left of the second line in the list of revisions. That will show you the page as it was before being redirected. JohnCD (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * On second thoughts, there is a much simpler way: here is a direct link to the page as it was before being redirected. JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * replied on my talk page. Note that this was actually intended to be a non-prejudicial supervote so any editor, including Bljoe, is free to revert the redirect. However, I would strongly advise against doing that without sources as it's a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Steve Comisar
I am trying to make a page on behalf of Mr Comisar. He has been a legitimate albeit small time actor and has had some significance in the media. I am beginning to think that the "speedy deletion" of every single article I write is vindictive in nature. The speedy deletion of the biographical article on Mr Comisar, without comment or editing appears to also be vindictive in nature. -SpartacusXXX (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If you're talking about Steve comisar, that was deleted as a copyright violation. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Online codes highlevel.png
 Deleted for copyright reasons despite having license tags. I created it. -Agl (talk) 02:52, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done please add text to the file description page to say that you created it, preferably more verbosely and using the template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Online codes time against blocks graph.png
 Same as above, file deleted for copyright reasons despite license tags. I certify that I created it. -Agl (talk) 02:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done please add text to the file description page to say that you created it, preferably more verbosely and using the template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:58, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Zeta Phi Beta 1957
Would like to work from both this page and the Spanish Language page for the organization es:Zeta Phi Beta to create a referenced page. Note, if this can be done and placed in the Mainspace, it would be as Zeta Phi Beta (Fraternity) (should the Fraternity as a disambiguation in the title be capitalized?), as Zeta Phi Beta is an unrelated Sorority. The administrator User:Mikkalaiwho closed the AFD was subsequently banned as a sockpuppet. (as well as the sockpuppeteer) -Naraht (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Y Done See User talk:Naraht/Zeta Phi Beta (fraternity). Fraternity should not be capitalized as it is not a proper noun in and of itself and not part of the title proper.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Ad Dimaniyat Islands
OTRS permission confirmed; ticket 2011050810003792. -– Adrignola talk 12:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --Tikiwont (talk) 20:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Al Saleel National Park
OTRS permission confirmed; ticket 2011050810003792. -– Adrignola talk 12:19, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --Tikiwont (talk) 20:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

The Khawrs of the Salalah Coast Reserve
OTRS permission confirmed; ticket 2011050810003792. -– Adrignola talk 12:19, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --Tikiwont (talk) 20:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Fernando Herrera (Fireman)
Little or no debate after only a couple of hours! The article in question is of a high ranking member of the Houston Fire Department and mayoral candidate for the 2011 Houston mayoral election. Surely SOME debate needs to be done instead of just arbitrarily deleted without debate. -Hourick (talk) 19:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no assertion of notability there. Neither high-ranking members of the HFD, nor candidates for mayor, are notable as such. (See WP:POLITICIAN.) -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:58, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I understand, so basically, I have to find more "local" coverage to be able to create an article about him? As the election gets closer, I don't think that's going to be much of an issue, since it promises to be a heated campaign. --Hourick (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No, such coverage is likely to be about the election, not about Herrera as a person. The rule of thumb here is that we don't cover candidates just because they are candidates, unless they would be notable if they had never run for office. Wikipedia is not a newspaper and does not normally cover people brought to public attention due to a single event (such as a candidacy); we do not provide candidate profiles for people who may never be heard from again if they lose their elections. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, while I agree with you as a whole, there has been a significant number of articles that contain candidates that done nothing BUT run for office. Jimmy McMillan is an example of a WP:ONEEVENT, Jonny Porkpie is another.  Both ran for Mayor of NYC, BTW. Just so you don't think I'm just picking on NYC: Walter Moore (politician), James Harris (politician), and Chicken John.  The ONE candidate that I have started the article on was only started because of his current position.  That's not to say that anyone else that comes and throws their hat in will have an article, but at least this one person has just enough notability than the other candidates in the various cities that I have seen.  Believe me, I looked before I started Herrera's article, and if you see my contributions in the past, I have no ulterior motive to making this particular article. --Hourick (talk) 16:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done and will not be done Come back if he actually wins. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 00:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Carfax Abbey
kay, I am not fully versed in Wiki anymore (it's been forever.) But, the name I believe was Carfax Abbey, the url was http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carfax_Abbey http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carfax_Abbey&action=edit&redlink=1

This band has had two full releases. Second Skin (2004) (was sold at cdbaby, tower records, virgin records to name a few) and It Screams Disease (2007) (was sold in itunes, cd baby tower records, virgin records.) Had been on the label Dancing Ferrets. (believe they still are.) And, as well three demo/EP/smaller releases.

Has released two or more albums on a major label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of whom are notable).

Dancing Ferrets is the label of The Cruxshadows (which has had a #1 dance hit chart within the last few years. As well many other notable (at least to the darkwave and goth genre crowd) Voltaire I'm fairly certain shares this label. While not many are "charting" that shouldn't fully discount them. Well, feel free to delete this, whether you reinstate the page or not. If the page wont be re-instated, I would like to get some information from the stored copy. Is there anyway I can do that? (sheesh, didn't realize just cause something got "old" it would be deleted if they hadn't released something within a few years. Now I'm glad I never really put a ton of time into wiki work.) - bleh, it keeps saying i didn't submit this right... and, I honestly don't have the time to relearn "formatting" just to see if you'll not delete a page that, with some small bit of research, in my opinion never should've been proposed for deletion in the first place. -- 67.124.202.148 (talk) 09:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion: that would start a seven-day discussion. What the article needs is references to confirm what you have said, and that the band meets the notability standard of WP:BAND: if you are not confident about adding them yourself, explain on the article's talk page Talk:Carfax Abbey. JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

SB_Alliance English page was deleted
French and Spanish pages exist already -ACFreyd (talk) 13:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

I am the new person in charge of the SB Alliance (www.sballiance.org) and I would appreciate to be able to create an English page, knowing the page exists in French and Spanish already and we are an international non-profit organisation. Currently updating our website.

Here is what I found about the previous page you deleted: "The result was Delete, after discounting comments that are unsigned or from unregistered or very new users, as is customary. Stifle (talk) 18:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)" Here is the link to the discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SB_Alliance

I hope it's possible to do it again!

Thank you for your time, A.
 * Well, conflict of interest is brutal in this case, and English Wikipedia's rules for notability are different than on other projects. It looks like an ad for a non-profit, which is still an ad.  We agree not to write about ourselves our our companies. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 00:06, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Riviera Multimedia Ltd
reasoning -Deztone (talk) 14:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia. Please do not delete the page Riviera Multimedia Ltd. Although we are a company, the page contains on factual information about the company history and purpose. There are no adverts on the page and the company is a relevant contributor to the current media and music industry and the new technology available. I would add that there are other such organisations on Wiki that have not been deleted dispite similar content. I refer you to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_Performance_LTD. Please if you could un-delete the page I would be most grateful. Thank you, --Deztone (talk) 14:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Writing about yourself or your company generates a conflict of interest. Further, please be aware that Wikipedia is not an advertising medium, and the presence of other similar articles doesn't mean your article should remain. If your company is truly notable, someone will eventually write an article about it that can pass notability standards for companies. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

SWGEmu
I have reviewed the claims against this page's notability as being lacking of third-party sources establishing it as such, and I feel there is a strong case against this. I would cite that even a simple Google search with keyword 'SWGEmu' will land you with more than 70,000 results. SWGEmu is a community which offers an online game server hosting regularly 1,000 concurrent users, peaking at 1,600. Examining the search results from Google, you will also find that SWGEmu is debated on LucasForums, an affiliate fan site of LucasArts, which is a third-party source. On these forums, you may read that SWGEmu was contacted directly by LucasArts to negotiate terms that would place SWGEmu under LucasArts legally. These talks broke down, resulting in SWGEmu declining to be absorbed by LucasArts, so that they may pursue the project independently. Likewise, a Google search also lands one on the Nvidia discussion forums, where SWGEmu is heavily discussed and encouraged by forum administrators. I find it somewhat ridiculous that the article was deleted citing lack of notability, when in fact, so much third-party coverage of the project is easily discovered on the Internet. There is also a minor claim that the software is not available. I refute this claim by providing that SWGEmu is an open-source project which allows absolutely anyone the chance to download, compile, and run the source code for their own SWGEmu powered server. Furthermore, the original article cited sources of independent magazines and sites reporting on the SWGEmu project. This also negates the lack of third-party notability argument. It is somewhat disturbing that a unanimous decision in this regard could be reached on something a simple search reveals to be untrue. SWGEmu IS a notable project, and I appeal that it is re-evaluated with a little more effort involved. -67.61.224.160 (talk) 21:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * {[[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/SWGEmu (3rd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:11, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

DVDxDV
This article is still evolving and I would like to have the chance to further expand on it. -Dsm1156 (talk) 22:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ I'm sorry but this was deleted under CSD A7 so you'll have to discuss it with the deleting admin. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Emedicalpoint - Doctors, Health & Medical Web Portal

 * Deletion reason - the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Emedicalpoint.com is a biggest health & medical web portal which provides the free health and medical relation information around the world. Please, review my consideration so that i can create more interesting page for the viewers. --Rehmanmd (talk) 18:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done as it was an advertisement. You are free to write a new non promotional version. You should call this Emedicalpoint Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Chaos
 This page was deleted after this discussion, but there should have been a proper deletion discussion. The page history seems to be broken now. Also the old content should have been moved to other articles, not just removed. -202.124.73.8 (talk) 10:33, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The history was moved already to Chaos/Psuedo dab page. It had a life before 2 jan 2006 when the current Chaos was created, but there are so many revisions overlapping in time that a history merge make no sense.  It could be restored at a sensible name and redirected so that old revisions can be seen.  Since it was deleted as a G6 if contested it can come back, it just needs a sensible place to return how about Chaos/old version? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The page (in the form here: http://chaos.co.tv/) existed from 2006 until 10 May 2011, when it was deleted by moving Chaos_%28disambiguation%29 over the top of it. Shouldn't there have been an AfD to decide the deletion? Or a suggested merge of the old content to other articles? I would suggest restoring the old deleted Chaos article, and then bringing it to AfD. Deleting page histories without an AfD is against WP policy, isn't it? And if by G6 you mean CSD, surely that doesn't apply to the deletion of a long-standing popular article?
 * I tt was not actually deleted by that onlya redirect was overlayed in the move, However I have restored the old version to Chaos/old version. ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:06, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

File:10th icosahedron.png
The licensing and permission is the same as that for File:9th icosahedron.png. I uploaded the image, so I should know the licensing and permission. Please undelete the image, as it will probably be needed in the future to expand The Fifty-Nine Icosahedra article. -4 T C 07:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Timer reset to provide proof of permission. This seems also to be missing on the 9th file.--Tikiwont (talk) 08:33, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I removed the delete tags as "4" created the images from the program that required attribution. It does not need any further proof. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

File:11th icosahedron.png
The licensing and permission is the same as that for File:9th icosahedron.png. I uploaded the image, so I should know the licensing and permission. Please undelete the image, as it will probably be needed in the future to expand The Fifty-Nine Icosahedra article. -4 T C 07:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Note; although these are images, I do not know the correct venue to request undeletion of images. Hence I have made the requests here. Thank you, 4 T C 07:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Venue is fine. Timer reset to provide proof of permission. This seems also to be missing on the 9th file.--Tikiwont (talk) 08:34, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Coyle
I'm going to write an article about him, but I'd like to watch the previous version of this article. I also need some info about him to add to my fan-site. -31.28.203.165 (talk) 09:50, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are going to write an article, you will need to register an account, which is easy and free. If you do that and then leave a message here, I will userfy the article (put it into a user sub-page) for you to work on. JohnCD (talk) 13:05, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

OK. I'm now registered. My login - BurnleyBen.
 * ✅ restored to User:BurnleyBen/Nick Coyle Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:40, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

MTF Ltd
Article on one of the biggest finance companies in New Zealand. It can be improved through the citing of independent third party sources and general increase in detail -219.89.247.105 (talk) 23:36, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please improve it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Mohammad Shaikh
Hello! I see the deletion log on the Mohammad Shaikh page and it is very sad. Why is Wikipedia's editors being so harsh on the writers of this page? I have read and reread the instructions as not to make the same mistakes the other creators made. There were many others who worked on the Mohammad Shaikh page before I created a Mohammad Shaikh page today. It was deleted fast due to saying it was the same page. This is not true because I did not work on the other pages, nor have I seen the other pages, nor do I know the people who wrote the other pages. I respectfully request that the page goes back up. I do have a few minor edits I would like to make concerning some facts. If anyone else would like to contribute with some extra facts they are more than welcome. However, my finding of how there was speedy deletion is contrary to Wikipedia's policy of assuming good faith. When I ask a question, I am given citations of links I have already read. This makes no sense to me. Do you want to help build a page or delete them? I am frustrated. This is my first page, and I want it to stay up. There are pages that have one sentence and they are up. This Mohammad Shaikh page has a long record of frivolous charges against the creators for whatever reason to keep the page deleted. I want to stop this nonsense now. This page is grammatically and mechanically correct. I do need to edit a couple of pieces of factual information on the page after checking my facts later today. Wikipedia is for everyone to enjoy and anyone notable can be in Wikipedia. Mohammad Shaikh is notable. Please respond in kind. I don't know how to write to the specific editor on their page. I have looked for links and cannot find the link. Thank you kindly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mindingthequill (talk • contribs)

reason for deletion is an error  -Mindingthequill (talk) 04:28, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Please put page back up. Deletion took a few moments. My request is being ignored. Please put the page back up and if there is any errors that is legitimate, I welcome anyone who proves themselves professional to find facts to add to the page. Thank you kindly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mindingthequill (talk • contribs)

❌, please see this thread. This article has been recreated and deleted multiple times, and three formal deletion discussions have established it is not a suitable topic. If you want to have this discussion reviewed, you will need to initiate a full discussion at WP:Deletion review. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

ahsaan rizvi
 A strong article with fulfilling all the necessary conditions of Wikipedia Organization. Strongly referenced article (references are of high repute and reliability) has been deleted with the stance that there should be more references when already there are four English references. Urdu references are also present. -182.177.115.162 (talk) 09:06, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Ahsaan Rizvi, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

Rooma Mehra
Enough time was not given to research and fill in Citatations that were requested for. It was deleted within a day without a request for "Speedy deletion" and while a discussion was still going on, and a request for clean up was not allowed to happen. Research is a long process and requires time. Request undeletion of the article -Anthonio2010 (talk) 09:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * This was deleted early out of policy. The Afd discussion is at Articles for deletion/Rooma Mehra was closed in under 4 days .  I suggest you contact Cirt, or ask at WP:deletion review the article could also be userfied. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:13, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Over a week, surely? The AfD was created on 7 May and closed on 15 May. Or am I missing something? --bonadea contributions talk 10:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Bonadea is correct, not deleted early. Anyway I am not undeleting this, it needs a deletion review if consideration is needed that it was closed incorrectly. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Bangor University Law Society
This page page was intended to show how the society can improve the skills of Law students academically and socially. The work that was published on here was not copyrighted. The website in question http://www.lawsociety.kk5.org was designed by myself and all of the material on that website was created by me. Furthermore the administrators like to delete articles without showing any consideration and specifying a vaid (non computer generated) reason as to why it had been deleted and do not show how i can go about improving it. The second time i created the article from scratch, i avoided using words like 'we' and 'us' which gave a sense of promoting and publisising which i understand is not allowed. Please explain how this article is any different to any other Law society on wikipedia? -Ali 15:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. We have to assume that anything published is copyright, see Copy-paste, and we have no way to be sure that someone on the end of a wire is really the copyright holder. In any case, this was not deleted for copyright reasons but under speedy deletion criterion WP:CSD as giving no indication of importance or significance, and you should approach user, the deleting administrator. See the WP:FAQ/Organizations for more information. JohnCD (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

naija247news
Pls why did u guys deleted my article? and whats ur rules here...can u undeleted again pls -Godwineks (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * User talk:edgar181 deleted it with reason Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. You can ask for userfication so that you can improve it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Midway Drive-In (Texas)
The article provides information on one of three unique Midway drive-ins from the 40s and 50s era. All sources are valid. More sources are available from the time when the article was deleted. The article was proposed for deletion because of concern that the sources were not reliable compared to the other two Midway drive-in articles. -Rendered-data (talk) 23:25, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ as a contested proposed deletion. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Midnight on the Mavi Marmara
 It is a book edited by Moustafa Bayoumi, as his other works this book should has a Wikipedia page. The book is contributed more than a dozen of writers or thinkers, and it is an important source of a very critical event. -Mary Beth Connor (talk) 08:17, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has not been deleted: if you disagree with deletion, you can simply remove the PROD and PROD2 templates from the article. It may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion unless references are added to show that it meets the notability standard of WP:Notability (books). JohnCD (talk) 10:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Mohammad Shaikh, again
Editor said that I created the same page that was deleted before. This is not true. I had nothing to do with the page that was created before. Assume good faith!!! -Mindingthequill (talk) 17:43, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Why is a Islamic preacher/ teacher who has references not a suitable topic? There are plenty of others with the same credentials who are on Wikipedia. Why are you subjective in your decision making instead of following Wikipedia's policies? What policies are you going by? And if there is such a policy then I want everyone else off that is breaking this policy ASAP. Thank you kindly! What is fair for one, is fair for all!

Page was said that it could be recreated with proper grammar, which I provided. Then it was deleted anyway. See the following Wikipedia discussion from editors and administrators. Please restore page. I do have a few minor changes to make. :Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Shaikh (2nd nomination) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Is someone can find better sources then feel free to recreate this. Will userfy/incubate upon request. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC) [edit] Muhammad Shaikh AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Muhammad Shaikh 	Articles for deletion/Muhammad Shaikh (2nd nomination)

Muhammad Shaikh (edit -Mindingthequill (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. As it says at the top of this page, it is not for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions. It is not that you created the same article, but you created an article about the same person, and there have now been no less than four deletion debates on articles about him:
 * Articles for deletion/Muhammad Shaikh - 12 Jun 2009
 * Articles for deletion/Mohammad Shaikh - 4 Dec 2009
 * Articles for deletion/Mohammad Shaikh (2nd nomination) - 12 Oct 2010
 * Articles for deletion/Muhammad Shaikh (2nd nomination) - 12 Jan 2011
 * All of those concluded that he did not meet Wikipedia's notability requirement, which requires showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. As you were told further up this page, if you want to take this further, you will have to go to WP:Deletion review. You will not succeed there unless you can show more independent references. If you can do that, ask user, who closed the last deletion debate and offered to userfy if better references were available, whether he is willing to restore your article into a user sub-page for you to improve before taking it to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Both versions of the name have been redirected to the article International Islamic Propagation Center about his Institute. JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File:StellaTruncRhombicTriaconta.png
 I added the Copyright that I used Great Stella. -KirbyRider (talk) 22:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done I changed fur to information and added PD-shape. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Simon Plumbe
reasoning -SimonPlumbe (talk) 23:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

I am not sure of the reason behind the deletion of the page but it appears from the brief description that there may be a concern regarding clarification regarding a match between the identity of the convention organiser and freelance writer referred to in the article. As the said person mentioned in the article, I can provide evidence to support this, and links to bodies of work online (and interviews with myself or features referring to both aspects of my work) that will substantiate information in the article that had been deleted.

I believe that the article was created originally by someone familiar with both aspects of my work when there was a crossover period in my earlier days in science fiction fandom and working in the computer industry.

I can be reached on -redacted- should more information be required.

Simon Plumbe, Freelance Writer / Convention Organiser
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Stltigga
My page was an original information work meant to inform the world of a composer. I was told that the page was ok on May 14 and on May 15 my page was deleted. I would like for my page to be reinstated so I can see what else was 'wrong' about my page, and a reason for a valid reason for its deletion.

After speaking with someone in the help section I was told that it was because it was advertising, Mr. Williams but in what way? Please this process is becoming very insulting and from where I am sitting counterproductive to why people should submit articles to this site.

Thank you -Stltigga (talk) 01:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Page has been userfied to User:Stltigga/Julius Penson Williams. Some advice added on user's talk page. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Fifteen ice-hockey players
A string of requests from with the complaint, in each case, that "This referenced article was improperly deleted after a BLPPROD was removed by a 3rd party."
 * ❌. I have replaced these with this single entry to save space, because this page is not the place for contested speedy deletions like these. As you have already approached, the deleting admin, without success, you should take these to WP:Deletion review. I suggest a single combined entry there. JohnCD (talk) 11:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Shusaku number
Originally deleted because notability was only established through an allegedly dubious source. I would have objected to the prod if I'd found out about it earlier! Certainly the page needs improvement. However, the assertion made in the prod (see User_talk:Aditsu) is incorrect: there does exist a Wikipedia article for the source Sensei's Library. The page may well end up being deleted, but I think it's worth discussion, and I hope the mention at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Go will gather some constructive attention. -Jowa fan (talk) 08:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it. JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Engineering Expo
reasoning -Shibani.gharat (talk) 10:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. You posted the article again as Engineering expo and it is the subject of a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Engineering expo - that is where you should give your reasons for keeping the article. JohnCD (talk) 13:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

World Ju-Jitsu Federation
reasoning -86.152.184.51 (talk) 14:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/World Ju-Jitsu Federation, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

National Inflation Association
The topic "National Inflation Association" has been totally blanked out and the Discussion and View History are not on the page. I would like to view this old material, as well as possibly edit it. Thanks -Alexethan31 (talk) 18:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * - there was no talk page, no discussion. The "article" consisted of the group's name, that it is "an organization devoted to preparing Americans against hyperinflation", a weblink to a press release about Ron Paul, and a statement that it issues press releases and "produces propaganda videos." If the organization is actually notable, you will need to create a new, more substantial article, with some evidence of actual notability. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

PaceButler Corporation
I believe PaceButler Corporation Wikipedia page should be undeleted because it is a legitimate company that has been in business for almost 25 years with a good track record. They are a notable business and should be recognized through avenues such as wikipedia. Any questionable links, submissions, etc. will be immediately changed and/or deleted. There is no intent to promote or advertise PaceButler Corporation through Wikipedia. I would like to state what the company does, length of service with references to support the company on your site. Any submission that was considered advertising or promotion was not intended in that matter and again, will be deleted or changed. Thank you for your consideration. -ChameleonMarket (talk) 15:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.


 * Looks like you've had a couple of tries at it, and the article still reads like an advertisement. I'd suggestion you read WP:FIRST, then try a version at WP:Article Incubator. When you think you've got it right, ask for constructive feedback there before making a request at WP:RFPP to have the new version moved over. HTH-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  00:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

It should be noted that "Chameleon Marketing" is a PR company working via social media; the account is a spam/role account and is being blocked. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:CFY musical.jpg
okay, let's try this one. Again not my image, needed for article, I will fix rationale, thanks -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Please check if it's okay. :) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

The Strategy of the Dolphin
Strategy of the Dolphin: Scoring a Win in a Chaotic World (Morrow, hardcover; Fawcett Columbine, paper) is not an obscure work. The book was a Literary Guild alternate selection, has been published in three German and two United Kingdom editions and in French, Portuguese, Spanish, Greek, Hungarian and Turkish. The German edition of Strategy of the Dolphin (Paidia Verlag) ranked No. 5 on the German business book bestseller list and No. 1 on the self-growth book bestseller list and has just been issued in its third printing. In France, Strategy rose to No. 3 on business-book bestseller lists and recently had its second printing. The book has hundreds of favorable citations on google.com. One of the most recent is this one on NewsnetScotland: http://www.newsnetscotland.com/economy/2424-what-do-we-do-about-the-sharks.html} For other highly positive references to the work, see these Wikipedia entries: Strategic management, Whole brain literacy, Marketing warfare strategies and Clare W. Graves. Also see these links for comments on the efficacy of the dolphin strategy model: http://www.brainmeup.com/blog/2006/05/struggling-with-the-sharks/ and http://www.brainmeup.com/blog/2005/10/nurses-and-dolphin-strategy/ } -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mind quester (talk • contribs) 23:14, 17 May 2011
 * ❌. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/The Strategy of the Dolphin so, as stated at the head of this page, it cannot be restored here. If you think the debate was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should first approach user, the administrator who closed it; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 19:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Mark Noyce confused poker player.jpg
OTRS permission confirmed; ticket 2011050810004639. -– Adrignola talk 00:52, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Keep Young and Beautiful (song)
notable -Colonel Warden (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:59, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Eltaibzh/Giad
Giad industrial group is considered the biggest industrial complex in Sudan. It produces almost everything people need, from wheat floor to tractor and buses. It also employees thousands of people. I would like to have to article restored to me user space so I can improve it. Thank you. -Eltaibzh (talk) 13:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. The page in your userspace was a copyright violation, being material copied from the company's website at www.giad.com. Wikipedia cannot host copyright information, even in userspace, unless a formal copyright release has been made. In any case material taken from a website is likely to be unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, being too promotional and/or too detailed, and lacking the independent references need to show notability. You would do best to write an article in your own words, with references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

levi stephen
levi stephen did in fact play professionaly for Glasgow Rangers and Clydebank football club, but he played under the name Levi Smith, he signed for Rangers in May 1990 and stayed there for three seasons, he then went on to play for Clydebank in the old First Division.

Here are some links as evidence,

http://www.neilbrown.newcastlefans.com/clydebank/clydebank.htm

http://www.rangersfchistory.co.uk/players/playerss.php

http://www.rangerspedia.org/index.php/Smith,_Levi

http://www.carlowayfc.co.uk/modules/page/Page.aspx?pc=12&mid=30468&pmid=0

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/cup-that-cheers-falls-a-little-flat-for-minnows-rowley-earns-the-praise-as-buckie-march-on-1.205071

-94.173.6.122 (talk) 17:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. Please update it with these references. JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Leonard Kaye (Leonard K. Collins)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettybaiu (talk • contribs) 23:40, 18 May 2011
 * ❌. As explained on your talk page, the article was deleted because it was a copyright violation, copied from http://leonardkaye.webs.com/. Wikipedia cannot host copyright material - see Copy-paste - unless a formal copyright release has been made. I have deleted from above here the same material which you copied again. Material copied from a website is in any case likely to be too promotional for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view and references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. You would do best to write an article in your own words, but first read WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Jesper Jensen (ice hockey b. 1991)
Please restore the edit history for this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Vera Baker
reasoning -andycjp (talk) 04:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Are we allowed to know nothing about the woman?


 * I suggest that you bring this article to the attention of Deletion review as it would be reasonable to argue that the AfD should have been closed with "No Consensus". Dolovis (talk) 05:03, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Vera Baker so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be restored here. If you believe that the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should first approach user, the administrator who closed it; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

HyperCITY Retail (India) Ltd
Article was deleted from userspace draft under (R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace). Live page was deleted when it was under revision as spam. There was no intention of spam or advertising. (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion).The talk page where I mentioned that I was trying to revise the article was also deleted under(G8: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page: the associated page was deleted per WP:CSD#G11 as unambiguous advertising / promotion.) Like the page to be restored and so that it can be re-written -OnlinePR2011 (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done The last version wouldn't be a good start for an article and shouldn't be restored for copy right concerns, the other was point ing at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HyperCITY Retail (India) Ltd which I've now deleted as blanked by author. If after reviewing our conflict of interest guideline, you want to work further on this topic you should start fro scratch using only one account.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

India as a rising superpower
reasoning - Neilpine (talk) 07:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC) This artical made by me was recently proposed for delation by users User:MrGRA and User:Swedish_pirate and has been deleted. The reason given that the format was messy and had nationalistic characteristics. I do beleive this was not well formated but it is not reason to be set for deletion again and again. I believe that the given in time any article can be well put to the regular standards by other contributing users. I do not however believe that anywhere in the article there were any nationalistic issues that were brought up in the discussion page. I also believe that page in detail stands on its own from the page Potential Superpowers. I would also like to make an argument that the users proposing and in favor of the page getting deleted were all european and micht have some antisemitism towards Indians. I would like the admin to consider to undelete the page.
 * ❌. This article was redirected to the "India" section of Potential superpowers after being deleted at a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/India as a rising superpower, following earlier deletion with other articles after Articles for deletion/China as an emerging superpower (fourth nomination). As stated at the head of this page, articles deleted after a deletion discussion cannot be restored here: you should first approach user, the admin who closed the discussion and then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. Please read WP:NPA and do not attack other editors' possible motivations: the only question is whether the article meets Wikipedia's standards and requirements. JohnCD (talk) 12:25, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * See also Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Sicadis
The information contained in this article was taken straight from the band's website and displays a neutral outlook on the band by only containing the achievements and history of the band. I can provide links to verify any debatable content. -Sicadis (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * First, you have massive WP:COI. Second, the band fails to meet the notability requirements for bands. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 22:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khadija_Zeynalova
the page was deleted due to there was no source mentioned, I've got a source to mention now. could we please restore the page? -79.197.174.253 (talk) 12:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done I have reset the delete count down timer, so please add the sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Bernard McNamara
 Article was delted under (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). The person invovled is a significant player in the 2009/2010 downfall of the domestic Irish banking sector, being a debtor of c. EUR1.5bn of the main Irish banks. -194.69.198.227 (talk) 11:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The article as written was a very brief advert, with no assertion of what you state above. Nothing even remotely worth saving. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

D.U.D.A.
reasoning He is a notable rapper and musician who is famous amongst Albanians all over the world and has had success with selling his music to Albanian speaking people. D.U.D.A. has also appeared on MTV in Germany and Scandanavia -Oltianruci (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ Though deleted by PROD this is an unsourced BLP. However, you or anybody else is free to write a new article with sources. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Seven Group
This article was deleted two months ago via an expired PROD tag ("The article is not notable, no in-line references"). The thing is the Seven Group, or "Big Seven", was a major criminal organization during Prohibition and a precursor to the National Crime Syndicate. And there isn't much point in adding in-line citations when there's only one reference listed. -72.74.221.5 (talk) 22:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * - if the information is correct, we would need some sources that are not a solitary other encyclopedia. What were Sifakis' sources for this article? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

The book is available here though there's plenty of sources available online. 72.74.225.43 (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No comment on the merits of the article/request at this time but I would like to point out that the article was originally PRODed by a blocked sock. See also here. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Between the nomination by a blocked sock and a first reference present, I don't really see a reason not to restore it as contested prod. No prejudice against merging or bringing this to AfD. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Greylingstad
i could not paste new article over previous version -Ecbotha (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I FOUND THIS ARTICLE ON GREYLINGSTAD THAT SEEMS TO BE MUCH MORE ACCURATE THAN MY ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION, I TRIED TO PASTE IT IN DURING EDIT, BUT I COULD NOT DO IT. CAN YOU PERHAPS DO IT FOR ME? THE LINK TO THE ARTICLE, WHICH CONTAINS IN PART SOME OF MY PERSONAL WRITING, IS: http://boksburghistorical.com/index_files/BHAjulaug2010.pdf

MANY THANKS

ETTIENNE BOTHA 
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done You tried something that neither worked nor would be the appropriate way to improve the article. So I had to revert your edit and also removed the text here. As you probably noticed, your previous addition had been removed as well. The article of yours may or may not be a good source for some info but it shouldn't be simply pasted as it is something different than what we're trying to do here. That being said I hope you find a way to share with us what you know about Greylingstad.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:16, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

charlton-king-vandam historic district
This is a landmarked New York City neighborhood which had an entirely accurate description. For some reason this was deleted. No idea why. Please revert. Thank you! -67.250.34.197 (talk) 14:17, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see revisions under the name you gave nor the one I'd expect. Can you check the title? looking at the other redlinks in List of New York City Designated Landmarks in Manhattan below 14th Street, I see some haven't yet been created, others deleted because created by a banned user. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:53, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

SoldierKnowsBest
It is now a show on the revision3 network, the previous article was deleted as there was not enough third party information at the time -86.40.234.250 (talk) 19:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/SoldierKnowsBest, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

omniscient technology
 No where does this page actually advertise anything as claimed by the people who deleted the page. It is menat as an informational page about the term omniscient technology. -71.202.105.17 (talk) 20:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ This was deleted as a result of this deletion discussion so it can't be restored here. You'll have to discuss this with Cirt. However, he's usually pretty good about restoring and reopening the AFDs for "1 voters". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌, only able to userfy for registered users, not request of an IP, unfortunately. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 02:26, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

✅, back at AFD. Relisted. -- Cirt (talk) 04:15, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Worcester County Mathematics League
WP:NOTPAPER; league is more notable than others that remain (with stub-quality articles) -Rjyanco (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ as a contested proposed deletion. Note that this will not prevent another editor from nominating the article for deletion and if that happens, NOTPAPER and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS arguments won't cut any ice. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Undeletion request
Can the following deleted articles be placed in my userspace please? Thanks Mathewignash (talk) 21:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Bruticus
 * Fangry
 * Flamewar (Transformers)
 * Over-Run
 * Scalpel (Transformers)

Nelson Mariano II
Because it's our own picture that we tagged in my account in Facebook -CKwarrior (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Eldar Gasanov.JPG
because i'am the one who took a picture of it and upload it on Facebook then make it a picture of the Subject -CKwarrior (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Well face book says uploader was "E Lo Isurina Mariano" If this user can place a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license text aginst the iamge we can believe the claim. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)