Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 41

adriana-mugnatto-hamu
 I don't know why the article was deleted - I'm guessing lack of notability. I don't know if I'm using the right process to find out - any help would be appreciated. I'm not yet contesting the deletion - I don't even have any information about why it was done, so I wouldn't presume to contest the reasoning. -Bobagem (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's actually quite easy to find out why it was deleted. The title of the article above is red, which shows that the article does not exist. However if you click on that "redlink" and the article did once exist, you will see the deletion log which shows who deleted it, when and why. In this case it gives a reference to a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu. The reference to WP:POLITICIAN there is to a policy which says that (to discourage use of Wikipedia as an election campaign platform), merely being an unelected candidate for political office does not confer notability. If you want to pursue this, you should first approach user, the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Grant George
Over-zealous editor removing an article on a prolific voice actor. I mean come on - look at the sheer number of pages that link to him - even from other wikis that cover his roles! -203.122.219.202 (talk) 00:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Other wikis are not reliable sources; neither is the IMDb, nor his own websites. Oh, look: that seems to eliminate all the "sources"! -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll also add that this was an unsourced BLP. I'm usually the first to argue that contested PRODs should be restored without any hassle but in cases like this it's better to leave it deleted but allow any editor to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

CreditLoan.com
The article was deleted on the basis of G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion; however the criteria states that "An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." The article on CreditLoan is neutral. No negative information was available or it would have been included. The article explains what the website is, and who is behind it. It is a high traffic site, with a large number of financial articles, and is described and referenced in the Wikipedia article, but no recommendations or suggestions of patronage are made. Please reconsider and undelete. -RiverWriter (talk) 02:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ Whether or not an article is "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" is subjective but in the view of the deleting admin it was. You need to discuss this with Athaenara. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:19, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

PSY (Korean Hip Hop Singer)
Psy is a legendary singer in Korea and deserves a Wikipedia page. The issue was "Expired PROD, concern was: no third party sources to indicate notability". Not sure what that means, but he is definitely a "notable" person. Ask any Korean =P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.53.199.60 (talk • contribs)
 * ❌ Though deleted by PROD this was an unsourced BLP. However, any editor with an account is free to create a new sourced article on this subject. I'll also be happy to incubate this article upon request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP
OTRS permission received in ticket 2011061410014865 for all content under http://www.parkerpoe.com/about-us/ -– Adrignola talk 19:26, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Some of the content was from other sub-pages of the site, does the ticket cover that as well? January  ( talk ) 20:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done, removed content from other sub-pages in the meantime. January  ( talk ) 21:02, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Even if they are cleared, it might be better not to add back the other sections, which could well get it speedied G11, being all first-person and peacock terms: "We are proud of our TerraLex relationship and the global resources it brings to all of our clients.... dedicated to providing a quick response to clients' needs... innovative solutions... ongoing and immediate benefit to clients of our firm..." JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * My statement that "all content under" may have been ambiguous, so to clarify, that page and all subpages. – Adrignola talk 20:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Indian media bias in politics
In India News groups are in business houses hands. Business houses area alaways foucs on their interst. Also this is a big story in past how business houses are beneifited by Indian Govt. So news/ media can be biased  or in favour of Govt as all business in india has deep influnce/controll from Govt.

As a Citinizen of India I feel we should know all information arround such topic. I would request you to open this link

Regards Indian -134.159.168.104 (talk) 07:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Redirects to Media bias in India, no previous article in the history or logs. Target has been proposed for deletion but is not yet deleted, if this is the article you meant please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. January  ( talk ) 13:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Since the article had previously been discussed at AFD and also considering this "misplaced" challenge. I went ahead and removed the PROD. However, this won't prevent someone from taking it to AFD if they wish. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:AFL-Uniform-Current-COL.PNG
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Colorado Crush. -Zundark (talk) 09:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done January  ( talk ) 12:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Check_Into_Cash
I could not find much information in the deletion log other than "blatant advertising." That can easily be remedied and I would like to look at the original material and get this article re-published, informatively. Information can be added - I see no reason for the article to be deleted without a chance to revise it. Thanks. -Checkn2cash (talk) 12:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The original material contained canned marketing phrases like "As a leader in the payday lending industry, the company offers small, short-term loans...". No independent sources or any sourcing of any kind to verify the claims. Written by the company, (your account name does seem to have a conflict of interest), I would suggest you read the Business FAQ first to understand our policies. -- Alexf(talk) 13:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Hey boys and girls (truth of the world pt 2).jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Hey Boys and Girls (Truth of the World pt.2). -Zundark (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ I'll give you 24 hours to add it to an article. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   15:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, but as I said in the request, it's already in an article. --Zundark (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:KishMauveBlackHeartAlbumCover.png
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Black Heart (album). -Zundark (talk) 15:45, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * As above. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   15:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Boys Don't Cry.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Boys Don't Cry (album). -Zundark (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:HoldYou.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Hold You (album). -Zundark (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Lalbum.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in L (album). -Zundark (talk) 16:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Outbreed.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Outbreed (album). -Zundark (talk) 17:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done January  ( talk ) 21:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Roustabout.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Roustabout (album). -Zundark (talk) 18:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done January  ( talk ) 21:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:The Shit.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in The Shit (album). -Zundark (talk) 18:32, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done January  ( talk ) 21:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

nanoceramic
reasoning -Kmparnell (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

Not to sure why this has been selected for deletion. I have re-read it and it is factual and educational. I'm beginning to think that women are being cyber bullied by this website!!

Karen
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. As to the other: HORSEFEATHERS AND POPPYCOCK! Nobody knew or cared as to the gender of the creator of the article; but we require verifiable citations from reliable sources as a necessary component of articles: and that's what was being asked for. Gender bias is too important an issue for this kind of nonsense to distract us. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:45, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

The Armory Foundation
OTRS permission confirmed in ticket 2011061710012325. -– Adrignola talk 20:52, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done January  ( talk ) 21:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Nena Daconte-He Perdido Los Zapatos-Frontal-1-.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in He perdido los zapatos. -Zundark (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:The Legendary Pink Dots - Malachai (Shadow Weaver Part 2).jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Malachai. -Zundark (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Memphis Drama Vol3.jpeg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Memphis Drama Vol. 3: Outta Town Luv. -Zundark (talk) 08:33, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:The Dandenong Journal - 1966 21th Apr - page 1.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Westall UFO. -Zundark (talk) 08:42, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The image proposed is used in a gallery, normally not allowed, can you supply a reason why it should be used, rather than a description of what it says with a reference? Also the image was over 1000 pixels high, as need to make the text of a newspaper page readable, but this would be too large for a fair use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If you think the image should remain deleted for reasons other than the one for which it was deleted, that's OK with me. (As for adding a description of what it says to the article, I obviously have no objection to that, but I can't do it myself, because I don't know what it says.) --Zundark (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply and thanks for the good work deorphaning images. I will mark this [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done for reasons that use is not fair. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:MacKillop Catholic Regional College Werribee crest.png
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in MacKillop Catholic Regional College, Werribee. -Zundark (talk) 08:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Girlicious - Baby doll.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Baby Doll (song). -Zundark (talk) 09:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Cruel.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Cruel (song). -Zundark (talk) 10:50, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:hallohallo.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Hallo Hallo (Ace of Base song). -Zundark (talk) 16:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done January  ( talk ) 17:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:BonniePinkMorningGlory.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Morning Glory (Bonnie Pink song). -Zundark (talk) 16:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done January  ( talk ) 17:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Strasbourgcover.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Strasbourg (song). -Zundark (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:CD SUPR LRG.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Supernatural (Hillsong album). -Zundark (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Finger Puppet Games
 Provided ample justification for validity and significance of page and it was deleted without discussion. Very bad form. Please reply and discuss.-Questmachine (talk) 22:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done This could just as easily have been deleted as a G11 for its promotional tone. This is a brand-new company which hasn't even issued any product yet; the author seems to feel that reflected importance of a city, an executive, etc. is sufficient to make up for a complete lack of any asserted notability of the subject itself. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Kay Kristin Boutilier
The article was deleted under A7 and G11 criteria if I remember correctly. As the author, I felt as though neither of these reasons were valid and had been performing edits to ensure, for example, that there was nothing that could be taken as advertising or promotion of any particular group or entity. The article was well referenced and unbiased. The article was about a musician and under the criteria listed in the wikipedia guide as to the relevance of musicians/bands/singers, the subject met multiple of the suggested reasons for being included in wikipedia. I believe that the article was not only deleted without justification, but also before edits/discussion was complete- which should have been obvious by examination of the talk section for the article, in which a discussion on numerous points was being had with the person who had tagged it for speedy deletion to begin with. As the contributor of the article, I think it was deleted without proper review and would appreciate its restoration. Finally, a point that was brought up in the talk was that it was a possible COI, however, I would like to assure that this was not the case. Thank you for the time. -Wiki86420 (talk) 02:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The article was undeleted by the deleting admin for further review. I removed the tag and sent it to articles for deletion. If you wish this article to be kept then you can make your case here. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Image:Logo landbank.png
orpharned because it was replaced by a version uploaded on the Commons. That version is now deleted. This image will be restored to Land Bank of the Philippines. -Bluemask (talk) 08:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done January  ( talk ) 13:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

File:St. Augustine's College Yarraville Logo (black and white).jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in St. Augustine's College, Yarraville. -Zundark (talk) 08:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done January  ( talk ) 13:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Reading Cloggies
reasoning -ChrisJBrady (talk) 09:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC) This page was deleted DESPITE the Talk feature requsting that this not be done. Further - there was no communication from the administrators saying that this would happen. i am not going to waste my life creating pages only to have them arrogantly deleted by self-appointed administrations who know nothing about the subject AND who don't have the courtesy to communicate with the authors they hack and delete. Never again.
 * ❌. Administrators are not "self-appointed" - they are appointed by the community after a fairly tough grilling and a selection process that lasts a week, and they work to standards agreed by the community. You were notified on your talk page that the article had been tagged for speedy deletion; the notice gave the reasons and relevant links, and it also explained that an article which meets the criteria for speedy deletion, in this case WP:CSD, may be deleted without delay. If you click on the "redlink" to the article, you will see the deletion log which will tell you that the article was deleted by user, and he is the person you should approach if you want to proceed. First, read Your first article and consider whether you can show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to meet Wikipedia's notability requirement; if so, ask Nyttend (perhaps more politely than this request?) to userfy the article - copy it into a user sub-page - for you to work on. JohnCD (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

JCI Bangladesh
It is not a advertise rather share the activities about active citizenship which the organization is pursuing for the betterment of the community -Mahibekram (talk) 10:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. The first few versions of your article were too promotional; also, they were copied from your website, which is not allowed unless a formal copyright release has been made. The last version was not promotional, but it still did not give any reason why the organisation was important or significant enough to have an encyclopedia article. In Wikipedia terms, that's called notability, and is not a matter of opinion: it has to be demonstrated by showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The test is, have people independent of the organization thought it important enough to write substantial comment about? More advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Frank Lauren Hitchcock (1875-1957).jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Frank Lauren Hitchcock. -Zundark (talk) 10:42, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

This Week in Tennis
I believe This Week in Tennis article should be undeleted because I wasn't able to add additional information to article before it was deleted. I figured I'd have to add onto article in a timely fashion and didn't know about the Speedy Deletion method. This Week in Tennis is similar to Tennis Week which currently has an article on Wikipedia even though it's no longer in business. Thank you for your consideration. -Mickle75 (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Mickle75/This Week in Tennis. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted.  Salvio  Let's talk about it! 13:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Amaranthe


I believe this band meets Wikipedia notability criteria. There are four pages in different projects (check the Swedish page), the band has two independently notable musicians (Olof Mörck and Elize Ryd), their first album charted in at least two countries's national music chart (check this reference) and the band has been the subject of multiple published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself (check the Portuguese page). If necessary I help to improve the page. Thank you for your consideration. 189.74.193.181 (talk) 04:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ The article was deleted under our speedy deletion criteria so is beyond the scope of this board. You'll need to first discuss this with the deleting admin and then at deletion review if not satisfied with the answer. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:09, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Girls-aint-nothing-but-trouble-single.gif
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Girls Ain't Nothing but Trouble. -Zundark (talk) 10:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

PKsoft
'PKsoft''' is an real company in Sri Lanka -  P  asindu Kavinda  Talk 12:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ Yes it's a real company but none of the deleted versions were able to state what set it apart from the millions of other "real companies" in this world. The Cuban restaurant a block from where I live is also a "real company" (and it serves pretty good food) but it doesn't have an article nor should it. See WP:CORP. Also, the article was created and deleted multiple times by the same editor who was eventually blocked for spamming. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

subhash sasidhrakurup
biography -Sujathasubhash (talk) 12:50, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that your first experiences here were negative. The subject (whether you or not) sounds like an amazing person but unfortunately the world is full of amazing people and the article failed to state what set him apart from all the other network security engineers in the world. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Juiced-JoseCanseco.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Juiced: Wild Times, Rampant 'Roids, Smash Hits & How Baseball Got Big. -Zundark (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

silvertech
I purposely kept any client name, services, etc. out of the silvertech article. The article was created as it is the company that purchased a historic building, Ash Street School, in Manchester, New Hampshire and therefore felt the basic listing was appropriate. -Jeffmcpherson (talk) 18:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * - Notability is not inherited; a subject does not itself become notable by buying a notable building, jewel, patent or whatever. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:20, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Images linked from Banknotes of the Indonesian rupiah
An edit war recently raged at Banknotes of the Indonesian rupiah over how many fair use images can be used in the article, resulting in the page being protected until May 25 on a version without the images. Alas, this rendered the vast majority of the images orphans, resulting in them being nuked on May 20. There is a host of discussions all over the place on the copyright status of the images, which may in fact all be PD or free (see eg., , ), as well as an RFC on how many fair use banknotes are acceptable; but in the meantime, can we restore the images under their original fair use license, and ideally ensure that they're not nuked as orphans for at least a month of two? The lost images are linked in from this revision. Jpatokal (talk) 12:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for posting this-the edit warring by the problematic admin is getting old.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hold on a moment... wouldn't it be better to remember what version had them all linked, and then undelete them only when the RFC concludes? Undeleting them now is likely to lead to the edit war's resumption. Courcelles 12:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The topic of the edit war was whether the images should be linked into the article. This is distinct from the fact that the images exist, and keeping the images deleted means that they cannot be used anywhere else either, or retagged as free content if consensus so decides (and it's increasingly looking like that's the case). Jpatokal (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Bump. Jpatokal (talk) 22:57, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Not touching this with a ten foot pole. When you get consensus on specific images as to their copyright status or the validity of the FUR, post them individually and I'll restore them.  Until then I can't/won't restore the images pending discussion into a holding pen.  If they are free, re-upload them to commons.  Otherwise just let us know which ones have valid FURs. Protonk (talk) 23:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * That's the thing -- I am planning to move them to Commons, but I was not the original uploader and thus do not have the original images to upload! Jpatokal (talk) 03:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Which images exactly do you want to move to commons. Post those links and I can restore them (just don't want to mess w/ fair use business). Protonk (talk) 04:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. Commons should be sorted out and ready to receive the images now, so the list is: Jpatokal (talk) 12:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Bump! Jpatokal (talk) 06:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Indonesia 1946b 5r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 5r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 10r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 10r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 25r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 25r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 50r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 50r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1946b 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1948 50s o.jpg File:Indonesia 1948 50s r.jpg File:Indonesia 1948 1r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1948 1r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1948 250s o.jpg File:Indonesia 1948 250s r.jpg File:Indonesia 1953 1r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1953 1r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1953 250s o.jpg File:Indonesia 1953 250s r.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 5r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 5r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 10r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 10r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 25 0.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 25r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 50 o.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 50 r.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 100 o.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 100 r.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 1000 o.jpg File:Indonesia 1952 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 5r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 5r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 10r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 10r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 25r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 25r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 50r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 50r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 2500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 2500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 5000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1957 5000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 5r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 5r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 10r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 10r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 25r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 25r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 50r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 50r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1959 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 5r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 5r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 10r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 10r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 25r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 25r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 50r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 50r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 5000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958 5000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 10000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 10000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1963 10r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1963 10r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 25r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 25r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 50r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 50r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964b 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964b 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958b 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958b 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1958b 5000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1958b 5000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964b 10000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964b 10000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964c 10000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964c 10000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 1s o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 1s r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 5s o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 5s r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 10s o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 10s r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 25s o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 25s r.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 50s o.jpg File:Indonesia 1964 50s r.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 5r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 5r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 10r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 10r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 25r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 25r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 50r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 50r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 2500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 2500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 5000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1960 5000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 1r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 1r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 250s o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 250s r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 5r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 5r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 10r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 10r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 25r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 25r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 50r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 50r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 5000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 5000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 10000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1968 10000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1977 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1977 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1977 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1977 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1975 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1975 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1975 5000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1975 5000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1975 10000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1975 10000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1982 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1982 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1980 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1980 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1980 5000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1980 5000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1979 10000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1979 10000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1988 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1988 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 100r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 100r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 500r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 500r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 5000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 5000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 10000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 10000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 20000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1992 20000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1993 50000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1993 50000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1993 p50000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1993 p50000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1995 20000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1995 20000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1995 50000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1995 50000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1998 10000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1998 10000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1998 20000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1998 20000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1999 50000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1999 50000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 1999 100000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 1999 100000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 2000 1000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 2000 1000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 2001 5000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 2001 5000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 2005 10000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 2005 10000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 2004 20000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 2004 20000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 2005 50000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 2005 50000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 2004 100000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 2004 100000r r.jpg File:Indonesia 2009 2000r o.jpg File:Indonesia 2009 2000r r.jpg
 * ✅. Please either transfer them to Commons as soon as possible. They will continue to clog our database reports of non-free unused images until this is completed. Courcelles 13:56, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Downloaded, thank you! The images can now be removed. Jpatokal (talk) 11:43, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Goffs Oak F.C.
Created by the copyright holder, confirmed in ticket 2011062010002517. -– Adrignola talk 18:16, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I see this was restored and the OTRS permission given on talk page. However, it would be really good in future if you stated what is actually needed to put to bed the copyright issue—that the material had been properly released under a license compatible with ours (or into the PD of course). I assume that occurred and that it is tacit in what you say above, but it really would be good if it was stated more explicitly. The plain meaning of your message would not normally be at all sufficient from a non-OTRS person, i.e., if someone told me "I have confirmed the copyrighted material was added by the copyright holder", the proper reply to that would be "that's good, now have they released the copyright under a suitable license in a verifiable manner?"--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The talk page notification states the licenses it was released under and the ticket number for verification. My status as an OTRS volunteer implies that I've taken all actions necessary to ensure compliance with copyright laws and project policies.  Content of emails is confidential and if a copyright holder has edited the wiki directly and not disclosed it publicly I'm not permitted to identify their username.  If I provided all information necessary for a non-OTRS member to verify for themselves that would be a violation of the privacy policy and also defeat the purpose of the OTRS system. – Adrignola talk 16:08, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm wouldn't ask you to disclose any confidential material. In fact, what you say a few posts below is all I would want: "OTRS permission confirmed in ticket...", which is quite different than what you say above. I agree that proper permission is implied by the status of you being an OTRS volunteer, and I said that in my post, but when what I've been told is that an OTRS ticket has confirmed that the copyright holder was the creator (as above), as opposed to confirmation of permission (as below), I'm not sure I wold restore the material based on that.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:14, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

shahre mubarak masjid
This is real fact needs to be included in wikipedia -125.17.161.253 (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ The article exists and is under debate at deletion at Articles for deletion/Shahre Mubarak Grand Masjid Calicut. If you want this kept you need to make your arguments there (though I suggest you read both Arguments to make in deletion discussions and Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions first). This page is only for article that have already been deleted and on uncontroversial bases, so it has no applicability whatever to the deletion debate.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

BS.Player
' I rewrote the article here: User:Gryllida/BSplayer'''. I was unable to find players market share charts to estimate the userbase, but tried to give accurate, independent coverage of this software. --Gryllida 11:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC) -Gryllida 11:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The version in your sandbox still shows no real notification of notability ... it's just another playa. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 11:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Cannae (band)
Uncontested PROD. Are notable because they have two releases on a major record (Prosthetic Records). While they barely pass #5 of NBAND, they are a notable band. - TheWeak Willed  '' (T * G) 18:36, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, in case s/he wishes to take it to Articles for deletion. It will help if you can add references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to confirm notability. JohnCD (talk) 11:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Prosthetic is not a major record label, and to claim so is misleading. They may be a sizable indie label with a metal focus, but they are not major, nor are they a subsidiary of the four major labels.  I will give this a bit of time for sourcing, but if the label alone was the reason for the undeletion, some research needed to be done first. MSJapan (talk) 15:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * PROD is only for uncontested deletion, so a PRODded article is restored without question on any request. JohnCD (talk) 15:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Vicki Lansky
OTRS permission confirmed in ticket 2011062010009314 for material from http://www.practicalparenting.com and http://bookpeddlers.com. -– Adrignola talk 19:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. As usual with material copied from websites, it is promotional and lacks independent sources - I have tagged accordingly and removed the most blatant ad phrases ("perfect for... ", "ideal gifts" etc.). JohnCD (talk) 14:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Sigma Chi Omega
Copyright Issues resolved -Rudyryan (talk) 08:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC) This page was originally deleted because it was believed to be a blatant of copyright violation of sigmachiomega.com however if one were to double check the home page of the cite it clearly states that "The text of this website is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License." Thank you Rudyryan (talk) 08:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. The deletion log shows that this title has been salted after being deleted numerous times both as Sigma Chi Omega and as Sigma_Chi_Omega,_Multicultural_Fraternity,_Inc.. Although copyright concerns were the cause of deletion in April, the deletion this month after Articles for deletion/Sigma Chi Omega, Multicultural Fraternity, Inc. was on grounds of notability. Deletions at AfD cannot be undone here. The closing admin, user has userfied the article for you and told you what to do: find independent references, if you can, to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, and then take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Media Tenor
This article was deleted because of CSD G11, Blatant Advertising. Media Tenor International AG is suing our publishing house AZ Medien AG because of an article we wrote about them. I would like to verify the old English Wikipedia article about Media Tenor that was deleted on 2nd of February 2008. I would like to see the editing history again. -Christianbuetikofer (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I am asking advice about this - see WP:ANI. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Requester directed to legal@wikimedia.org. JohnCD (talk) 12:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

T. G. Baynes Solicitors
was unaware of proposed deletion -62.49.41.17 (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It may still be nominated at Articles for deletion (where I see it has been deleted once before, see Articles for deletion/T G Baynes). It needs to establish notability by references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Kindest Lines
 Being a page about an artist/musician, it meets the criteria of noteworthiness for having been written out by more than 2 reliable sources independent of the subject itself. It was flagged for speedy deletion, stating the article fails to prove the subject's noteworthiness, which is false. Though sparse, it presented all currently relevant information concerning the artist and contained proper citations. As such, it should be undeleted. -Jacksongravy (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. You should talk to the deleting admin, user, and then if you are not satisfied you can go to WP:Deletion review. But first see WP:BAND for what a band normally need to have achieved in order to have an article. With their debut album just released, it does not seem that Kindest Lines are there (yet). JohnCD (talk) 21:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Boris Mavashev BLP Wikipedia
reasoning -93.172.27.179 (talk) 17:02, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

This article was deleted on 7 June 2011 by Phantomsteve talk. The reason was no reliable sources. The editor also suggested to make the article more concise and more cohesive. Dr. Mavashev has presented such a more concise and more cohesive article with reliable sources,they were written about him and not by him. These reliable sources verifiable include -the journal Science Reprint Series -an article by L.Chyi, Dept. of Geology, University of Akron, USA, -an article by I.KObal in the Journal FIZIKA B (Zagreb) -the International Bibliographical Centre, Cambridg,m England, The International Einstein Award for Scientific achievements, Asia/Pacific Who's Who. -Who's Who in the world -My name is Ilja Moser, iljamose@012.net.il. I am the translator of the more concise version of this article and copyist of the new reliable sources, and I can send you both the concise article about Professor Boris Mavashev in English and the reliable verifiable sources. Please indicate to me an email address, in order to send you the concise article with the verifiable sources. Best regards, Ilja Moser iljamose@014.net.il
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. You are welcome to replace it with your improved version and sources. Read WP:Your first article for advice. If you need help, place  (two curly brackets each side) on the article talk page, with a question below it, or ask on my talk page. JohnCD (talk) 21:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Ksan cw.png
Logo is used in KASN article. It had been replaced by an incorrect one, and I have reverted but the image was deleted as it was unused -Peter E. James (talk) 17:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cesarcorralesboxing2010.jpg
 Permission was sent via email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org by Mr. Corrales. The email was further confirmed by Wikipedia through a contact form submission on Cesar Corrales' official website (www.cesarcorrales.weebly.com). -Booth088 (talk) 17:54, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Pokeware
Note: I'm not sure what's going on here: the complete text of this article was posted here, twice, just before it was posted as an article at Pokeware. As far as I can see, it has never been deleted, and as an article it may be OK, though there are notability and COI issues. I'll talk to the author. JohnCD (talk) 21:52, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's been deleted four times and supposedly protected from creation.-- Beloved Freak  21:59, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Now why didn't I see that? It was re-created as POKEWARE, but when I searched "Pokeware" it only turned up the new article, and there were no deleted versions in the author's edit history. It is now at "Pokeware" because I moved it there, thus busting the protection, but the system didn't give me any warning. Google suggested to me that a case for notability could be made. Oh well, bedtime, I'll look into it in the morning. JohnCD (talk) 22:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah well that explains how it was recreated - I was wondering how the creator had got around the protection! -- Beloved Freak  22:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Guillaume Dabinpons
reasoning -Simonabkarian (talk) 18:20, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

This page should not be deleted because

- This page is not an oprhan article. It can be linked to 3 different internal pages.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Little_Prince_(Lost)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Place_Is_Death
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brothers_and_Sisters_(season_5)

- The article was deleted twice. The first article was including references and external links to explain every facts. Everything written is verifiable via external webpage:
 * http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3191130/
 * http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Guillaume_Dabinpons
 * http://followmyfilm.com/2010/07/29/meet-guillaume-dabin-pons/
 * http://www.africultures.com/php/index.php?nav=evenement&no=6887
 * http://www.theatredufrene.fr/toutpublic.php
 * http://www.ciegerardgerard.fr/index.php/les-gerard

- written with a neutral point of view, this article cannot be considered as advertising or promotion.
 * ❌. The article was previously deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Guillaume dabinpons so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here. If you consider that discussion was wrongly decided, you should approach user, the administrator who closed it; if you are then not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. Please note that AfD did not delete the article as an orphan, or as promotional, but because it did not show that he met Wikipedia's requirement of WP:Notability, see also WP:NACTOR. JohnCD (talk) 18:51, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

St. Martin of Tours Catholic Church (Louisville, Kentucky)
Unclear how page fits deletion criterion; church in question significant part of Louisville religious history in mid-19th century -Maskaggs (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌. The complete text of the deleted article was "Saint Martin of Tours Catholic Church is a Roman Catholic parish in Louisville, Kentucky. It is part of the Archdiocese of Louisville and is located at 639 South Shelby Street." If you can write an article that explains why the church is important or significant, please go ahead, but read WP:Your first article first. I will put some other useful links on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Evan Knappenberger
I would like to have the last revision of this article emailed to me for review. No mainspace restoration required. -Phearson (talk) 02:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The only content of this article was a redirect to Iraq Veterans Against the War which was deleted at Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 May 31. There was also Evan knappenberger (lower-case k) which started as a two-line autobio by, created on 5 Sep 2007, and was also turned into a redirect on 16 Sep 2007. I have emailed you its text. JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

XSitePro
I would like to get a copy of the page text so that I can restructure my article for this website design software. -Martinjohnsonuk (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

I would like to retrieve the latest copy of the live page for 'XSitePro' before it was deleted. I intend to use the page content to restructure the article.
 * ✅ As you already seem to have a draft at User:Martinjohnsonuk/XSitePro, I have userfied the version before CSD to User:Martinjohnsonuk/XSitePro2. Keep one of them! ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 14:39, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Cool & Start Aviation
I believe this page should be not reinstated because, i work here so i have the correct permission to post up information on what my company specializes in. -Angelito17 (talk) 15:25, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * First, WP:COI. Second, notability issues. Third, just because you work there does not give you permission to copy their website.  Let's say your boss designed an airplane, you do not have the right to take the blueprints home and build one, then give it away ... ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 16:33, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Pat Noble
Notable and reliable sources provided -69.141.225.67 (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

The original reasons for deleting the page included a lack of notability and not enough reliable sources.

Since the article's deletion, Noble has officially become a registered candidate for Freeholder in Monmouth County, New Jersey, making him the only Socialist candidate[] on the ballot in New Jersey for 2011. He is also the Chair of the Socialist Party of Monmouth and Ocean Counties[].

Noble's candidacy has been featured in the [| Asbury Park Press], [| Red Bank Green], and [| Underground Progressive Radio].
 * - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Pat Noble, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 17:32, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, please note particularly that (in order to prevent Wikipedia being used as an election platform) the policy WP:POLITICIAN says that being an unelected candidate for political office does not confer notability in Wikipedia terms. JohnCD (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Nokia Sans
It was deleted because a PROD saying “non notable product”. The typeface is notable as it’s one of the corporate typefaces of Nokia, and it help describe design processes of that company. I didn’t see the state of the article, but if it is an stub, I can help expand it. —Fitoschido [shout] \\ 24 June, 2011 [04:05]
 * ✅ --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I moved the stub to a subpage to work in it. —Fitoschido [shout] \\ 24 June, 2011 [20:19]

File:Deftones - Back to School EP.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Back to School (Mini Maggit). (This is the end of my backlog. Thanks to all the admins who have handled these requests.) -Zundark (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done by Courcelles. --Zundark (talk) 13:18, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Iain Brown
reasoning -Supernood (talk) 21:08, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done Unsourced biography where asserting importance not credible. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Adarsh Mishra
I put mistakenly speedy deletion tag over it. while writing article. i unknowingly wrote in my first article. then i wanted restore my mistake i put speedy deletion tag to adarsh mishra -Sospm (talk) 22:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. You also seem to be mistaken about the sequence of events as this was created by tow different accounts, (and you should only use one account!), and then tagged by other editors. The secodn version was deleted by  Diannaa. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Shalini Bahl
The outside source of published articles and journals containing original research of Shalini Bahl being incorporated. request you to mail the deleted article so that changes can be made. One such example of her talk can be found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tp2fuDgnCk thanks

The article on Shalini Bahl have been deleted, citing A7. Request you to undelete the page as the Subject person has done extensive and authentic research on Mindfulness approach towards every aspect of life, be it business, personal lifestyle or general work environment. She has written 100s of article on various subjects ranging from management, spirituality and social media besides other. The above writings can be accessed at. The page been edited and her achievement were being included. She is already a famous personality in Amherst, MA. Her articles on subjects of management, social media, spirituality being widely published in respectable Journals like Journal of Consumer Research (forthcoming), Journal of Advertising, and Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. She is also a well known speaker appearing in TED, AWEtv and being invited in various national and international forums. The page has not been created to advertise the product and services but Ms Bahl has evolved an unique approach iAM approach - which stands for the Innovative, Authentic, and Mindful approach to business. This approach been used to help individuals, whether they are self-employed or employees, to become acquainted with what is unique about them and channel that for maximum productivity, engagement, and enjoyment in their work. Her original work of research on various subject, alliance (1), authentic (16), authentic branding (3), authentic business (2), authentic differentiation (1), authentic mission, statement (1), authentic personal brand (2), authentic women entrepreneurs (1), awetv (1), balance (1), blogging (3), blogging frequency (4), brain (2), branding (1), breathing (2), business (1), challenges (1), cluster analysis (1), community (1), conscious capitalism (1), consumer research (1), covert marketing (0), customer well being (1), effective communication (1), efforts (1) environment (1), environmental scan (1), ethical marketing (1), finding purpose (2), freedom (1), good questions (1), happiness (1) hidden beliefs (5), hidden fears (1), highest potential (2), how to do viral marketing (1), iAM Business Consulting (1), iAM person of the month (1), iAM Tip (2), increase productivity (2), inner conflict (1), inner critic (1), inner purpose (7), innovation (5), innovative (3), insights (1), inspiring (2), integral business (1), integrated (1), Life's lessons (2), LinkedIn (1), local business (1), market research (1), marketing (2), marketing with integrity (0), Measuring success (1), mind (2), mindful (3), mindful approach (4), mindful business (2), mindful marketing (6), mindful practice (1), mindful pricing (1), mindfulness (7), mindfulness practice (2) mission statement (1), move with ease (1), New marketing paradigm (3), new mindset (3), non profit (1), old thinking patterns (2), online id (1), paradoxes (1), passion (1), perfect business name (2), Personal branding (6), Pranayama (1), present moment (1), pricing (3), processes defining authentic business (1), product (1), professionl identities (1), profits (1), purpose (2), quotes at work (3), self awareness (5), sex sells (1), sharing online presentations (1), slideboom (1), slideshare (1), small budget marketing (1), social identities (1), social media (10), social media sites (1), Sri Sri Ravi Shankar (1), storytelling (1), stress (2), Sudarshan Kriya (2), sustainable (1), sustainable business (1), TCR (1), tools for digital identity (2), Transformative Consumer Research (1), transparency in business (1), truth (2), twitter (2), Uncategorized (1), unemployment (3), viral campaign (1), viral marketing (1), volunteering (1), win win situations (1), word cloud (1) can be accessed at. Request you to reinstate the page. -Szolan (talk) 02:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. -- Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  02:16, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

dear mike The outside source of published articles and journals containing original research of Shalini Bahl being incorporated to meet the requirement of notability from external sources. request you to mail the deleted article so that changes can be made. One such example of her talk can be found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tp2fuDgnCk thanks & regards

(Szolan (talk) 10:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC))


 * ✅ I have userfied the article User:Szolan/Shalini Bahl, but I honestly see nothing that is salvageable. You need to understand notability very well before trying to make this article work.  You also should read reliable sourcing and WP:YOUTUBE.  Do not try and move this article back into articlespace until you have checked with some respected senior editors about its quality. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 13:34, 24 June 2011 (UTC)