Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 54

Joe Napolitano
I feel as a supporter and contributor that my page Joe Napolitano was deleted for some unknown reason. I would like whoever deleted it or is in charge of the deleting to contact me directly and explain exactly why? All I did was made some corrections to the information and reformat it to make it more understandable. I didn't even create the page, it was done years ago by someone or some organization. I KNOW FOR FACT THAT ALL THE INFORMATION ON THAT PAGE WAS CORRECT AND CAN BE SUPPORTED AS SUCH. So whoever is responsible for the deletion should step out from behind the Wikipedia Curtain they hide behind and I'll show you where all the info can be verified, such as the IMdb. -75.4.10.111 (talk) 16:57, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I have procedurally nominated it at WP:AFD using the original Prod rationale. GB fan 17:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note, however, that the IMDb is notoriously not a very reliable source, and people have been known to pad their resumes there. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  19:09, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Roger Boas
personal vendetta -Rogerboas (talk) 20:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

My edits were removed due to a claim they did not adhere with the "neutral Point of view" Rules, however, this was pertinent information that was submitted using factual, accurate documentation.
 * The article has not been deleted. Your edits, however, were removed as they did not achieve WP:CONSENSUS.  Based on the bold, revert, discuss cycle, you might be able to obtain new consensus on the article talkpage.  A significant warning: you appear to have massive conflict of interest, and the only edits you should be making to an article about yourself would be to remove unsourced derogatory content from a WP:BLP.  This is not a place to edit your autobiography, ever. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 21:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Adding ... the "sworn in as Chief Admin Officer" is clearly non-encyclopedic, and will not be undeleted ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 21:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd like to note that I'm attempting to help this editor via WP:COIN, the article's talk page, and their talk page. The user added some good information but at the same time, removed good information.  I don't believe they are the subject of the article either.  If there problem persists, I'll take it to WP:COIN and WP:ANI.  Ol Yeller21  Talktome  22:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

The Inkredibles
The Inkredibles are a music production duo responsible for many US Billboard albums and singles. There are a plethora of lesser producers that have remained on Wikipedia uncontested. I arrived on the deleted page looking for more information on the producers, and as best as I could tell, the page was deleted by a user who has made a name for himself within Wikipedia by deleting entries spanning very diverse subject matter (indicating much of his proposed deletions are likely unfamiliar to him) by leveraging technicalities within Wikipedia's rules. From what I could gather, the article needs cleaning up, but should not be deleted. Thank you. (Redacted) -24.251.66.212 (talk) 04:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Although this was an expired WP:PROD, [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject..  In short, the article was rightly deleted because it was wholly unsourced and unproven.  Using WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is never a good argument.  You should be aware that admins delete WP:PROD articles across a range of topics because other people nominated them for deletion, made valid policy-based arguments, which can then be verified by the admin before they are deleted - no technicalities involved. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Ahmad Afsar
Important information about Equestrian Professional in India -Naseehat (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject..  Although this is a WP:PROD, the requirments under biographies are very clear as to references. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 14:01, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

The forgotten emigration of Muslim Cretans
reasoning -178.135.1.34 (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

The forgotten emigration of Muslim Cretans This is an article based on personnal attestation of real emigrants who left the island CRETE in 1897 and their story was not narrated in any historical textbook. Although it is possible to find the story of the SITIA massacre in TIMES magazine issued in 1897 in 20 february.

I will be glad to get any specific reason for this article to be deleted, or the way it is wanted to improve its quality. Thank you. Author: Dr.Ali BEKRAKI
 * Contest the PROD by removing it, but don't be surprised if someone takes it to WP:Articles for deletion. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 21:52, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

dr ajay pratap singh
reasoning -Dr ajay pratap (talk) 16:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

dr ajay pratap singh

pag

page is undeleted because the information is correct,authenticated

during editing page is deleted ...while want to add images .,,,,please tell me how to add images
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  Orange Mike  &#x007C;  Talk  21:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

london ethnic
The page was totally rewritten after it had been flagged up for deletion. References to any websites other than academic ones were removed. Wikipedia would benefit from more pages about fashion - as an eg, there are hundreds+ pages on musicians and hardly any on designers, yet both groups produce artistic material that is sold commercially. In fact, almost all fashion designers are much less commercial than most of the musicians with wikipedia pages. To a lot of people fashion is a very important part of their culture and an online encyclopedia would be the best place for fashionistas to see new designs, movements in fashion and who is doing what and where. London Ethnic refers to a movement that is happening in fashion in London now..It refers to St Martins College and the London School of Fashion and what their students are doing.. -Saumen75 (talk) 18:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * So you're saying it's an up-and-coming next big thing, then? -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Benchoff


A pic I posted yesterday was questioned, perhaps scheduled to be deleted, so I edited today to clarify accordingly. The pic has a website address, and my clarification states that I have no affiliation with that website who took the picture of that airline crash. It is a news item, the FAA [encyclopedia type] lists have such events logged. Previously I also have had my own website address on the page [www.angelfire.com/dc/gov/index.html], which links to the appropriate FAA site and other similar reference sites; so no deletion should be made. -Benchoff (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. The file has not been deleted. Just to let you know, just because you find the picture(s) on the web, it does not mean they are public domain. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 12:46, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Sepyrecord.JPG


This image was uploaded and used on a blog about Sepy in the public domain. I asked the editor to assist on correct citing. I am new at the uploading process so would appreciate some assistance. ThieleOTT 15:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The file was not in the public domain; it was uploaded to a blog, but that does not excuse the copyright violation. It was not being used to illustrate an article on that (incredibly obscure) recording, but rather to decorate an article about the person who recorded it. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  19:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

iGrafx
The page was proposed for deletion by Oct 28 for lack of notability. G11 was referenced as a reason for speedy deletion on Oct 26 before changes could be made. Any information considered as promotional will be removed given a chance to revise the content i.e., "More than 1 million licenses have been shipped worldwide. It is considered one of the global market leaders in its field.[3]". References will be added to support notability: a) A book that talks about how to model processes and how to select the appropriate software. iGrafx is one of the software choices: http://www.barc.de/de/studien/prozessmodellierung/prozessmodellierung/prozessmodellierungswerkzeuge.html  b) 3 published articles in E-3 magazine jan 2008: http://www.e3cms.de/index.php?id=3053 nov 2009: http://www.e3cms.de/index.php?id=636 april 2010: http://www.e3cms.de/index.php?id=3404 -69.30.60.3 (talk) 16:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you want to start working on a draft of the article in your own user space? If so consider creating a Wikipedia account, and then leave a response here. The coverage in http://www.e3cms.de/index.php?id=3053 is disappointing. Though this is a supposedly independent magazine the writeup on iGrafx sounds quite laudatory and promotional. Armin Trautner, a company official, is allowed to speak at length about the virtues of his product with no critique by the interviewer. It would be valuable to have some neutral-sounding third party coverage -- even to verify mundane things like the one million licenses. EdJohnston (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * You're editing as an IP, and you may not be able to answer here due to the semiprotection. If so you can leave a reply at User talk:EdJohnston. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ❌ — Unless the user will follow up with creation of an account. EdJohnston (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Ed, I've created a user account, what do you need to see to consider allowing the page to go back up? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gretchenburthey (talk • contribs)
 * Can you find at least one published review of iGrafx which compares it against other products, rates its pros and cons, and does not sound like advertising? EdJohnston (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Ed. Here is an unbiased publication: A German book that talks about how to model processes and how to select the appropriate software. iGrafx is one of the software choices: http://www.barc.de/de/studien/prozessmodellierung/prozessmodellierung/prozessmodellierungswerkzeuge.html Also the Gartner Magic Quadrant: iGrafx is reviewed and placed in the leaders quadrant: "Magic Quadrant for Business Process Analysis Tools, David Norton, Mike Blechar, Teresa Jones Publication Date: 22 February 2010 © 2010 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved." Gretchenburthey (talk • contribs)
 * Do you have access to what those studies say? Do they give both pros and cons of the tools they consider? I don't think ordinary civilians can access those works without paying a lot of money. That may not be a fatal objection if you can quote from those studies when people have questions. EdJohnston (talk) 02:32, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

I have access to the Gartner study, they do one every year that can be quoted or printed, but not republished in electronic format. The report evaluates 15 vendors including iGrafx and gives strenths and "cautions" for each. I can certainly provide pros and cons of the iGrafx solution if questioned. Gretchenburthey (talk • contribs)

File:Bulawayo_Montage.jpg
to rectify copyright status -Demaru56 (talk) 14:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 15:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done I'm not seeing how you want to fix what has been uploaded as montage "compiled from both public and copyrighted images". --Tikiwont (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Selbourne Avenue.jpg
to rectify copyright issue -Demaru56 (talk) 14:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:00, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done Unless you can convince us that it isn't one of the copyrighted pictures mentioned above. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

instaVIN
I would like to have the article named "instaVIN" emailed to me or restored to my page so that I may edit to bring to Wiki's standards. Thank you in advance Ehirtens (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC) -Ehirtens (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Seems you'd need to set up e-mail first. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done E-mailed. Let me however reiterate also here that an article on the NMVTIS should be written from scratch based on reliable secondary sources.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Material Overindulgence
The page was deleted per copyright violations. I have received permission from the authors of the material in question to be used on Wikipedia and have forwarded the emails received to permissions-en@wikimedia.org -Cbliege (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Cbliege (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Cbliege
 * The article was Material overindulgence. Wait for an OTRS volunteer to confirm permission, and they can post here if they cannot undelete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

California Dream Week userfication (not undeletion)
rewriting article -Ludmila cdw (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I need userfication (not undeletion) for page California Dream Week. Thanks. Ludmila cdw (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Ludmila cdw/California Dream Week. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Nuesoft
This was deleted because of "Advertisement for another non-notable software business." The article is meant to house information on a legitimate company and it's technology. We would like to undelete and revise the content so it is not promotional. -50.73.87.146 (talk) 14:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Who is "we"? -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  14:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_(book)
Useful information, and no replacement page. -156.34.155.31 (talk) 20:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Even though this was deleted almost 2 years ago now. Someone will quickly need to establish its notability, and provide references. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 20:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Grand Doctor of Philosophy
I created this page to publicize a new degree available for doctors of philosophy in order to help solve global issues -Thegreatestwork (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

The Grand Doctor of Philosophy Degree goes above and beyond the Doctor of Philosophy and was created to improve the world by the doctor's contributions in solving global problems; and received a signed decree from King Albert II of Belgium to create this level of education. The World Information Distributed University was founded by award winner Master Eduard Evreinov of the Order of Science, Education, and Culture. The Forum met in Madrid, Spain on November 11, 2002 at The College of Medical Doctors where many dignitaries, college presidents, diplomats, and candidates for office took part in The Conference on World Peace. Much exchange and excitement continued throughout the day with greetings, salutations, dissertations, the presenting of medals to the awardees. In the evening a film on poverty was given by the Founder of the London Diplomatic Academy, Dr. Alphonso Roldan More. The candidates wore translators since much of the dialogue was in Spanish.
 * Please give the exact title of the page you mean. There has never been an article The Grand Doctor of Philosophy or Grand Doctor of Philosophy or Grand Doctor of Philosophy Degree or any variation that I have tried. Also, there are no deleted articles in your account's contribution history: the account has made no edits except one to its user page and three to this page. Do you have another account you used to make the article? JohnCD (talk) 22:59, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Bedwetting Alarm - Selecting an Alarm
This article: Bedwetting Alarm - Selecting an Alarm is an unbiased procedure to help potential users and buyers to apply rational criteria to select a suitable alarm. It has been present in this position in Wikipedia for over two years, and has inexplicably disappeared. Many readers have found it useful. Please restore. Thanks. -Nomorebedwet (talk) 00:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a how-to manual. Just because it's been around for 2+ years doesn't mean it's immune to deletion. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 05:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Elisa Gabrielli
What the heck?!! I am an actress who has worked hard at my career and was pleased to see I was listed in Wikipedia. I have approved updates to my info in the past and have been secure knowing that people looking up past projects...ie: "Madagascar" etc would be redirected to my name if they were interested and would find concise and appropriate information there.

I have received several calls saying that my listing has been deleted. How can this happen? Here's the info on the person who did it:

Editing Elisa Gabrielli A page with this title has previously been deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below. 00:08, 23 October 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted "Elisa Gabrielli" ‎ (WP:PROD: Nominated for seven days with no objection) 03:28, 9 July 2008 Alway Arptonshay (talk | contribs) moved Elisa Gabrielli to Elisa Gabrielli on treads ‎....and why can this person do this without me being contacted first?! Thank you, Elisa Gabrielli

This article was proposed for deletion on the grounds that "[a] search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals... Consequently, this article is about an American actress that appears to lack sufficient notability." After a seven day wait for objections, there was no disagreement with the nominator's reasoning, so the deletion was carried out. No offense, but we do not contact the subject of an article before it is deleted, since this is an encyclopedia, not Who's Who. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  19:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * As Orangemike says. We are not obligated to contact the subjects of articles we've deleted, and in any case a subject on Wikipedia needs to have been discussed in multiple third-party sources not controlled by the subject. No sources, no article. Simple as that.
 * Also note that, per our biographical policy, unsourced or insufficiently-sourced material about living persons, whether good or ill, can be deleted without repercussion. This includes fluff articles written by non-notable actors who act holier-than-thou when things don't go their way. (Not to be rude, but screaming at us isn't going to make administrators inclined to undelete your page, even if it wasn't a biography with insufficient sources.) — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Ok...one more thing...why are these responses so hostile? I am honestly confused by the first two responses. i didn't put myself on the site initially, I am a BIG supporter of and believer in Wikipedia and a big fan of its founder.I think it's a wonderful and informative site...This is my first time needing to interact with anyone on the site. reasoning -Juniper99 (talk) 18:53, 4 November 2011 (UTC) *** Please refer to imdb as well as articles in Variety, Hollywood Reporter, the Los Angeles Times etc, an HBO Special on "The Making of Madagascar", ..... I am unsure how to contact  you, but would appreciate your guidance in this matter. You can also go to my website (Redacted) for other press quotes, link to full resume etc. Thank you.


 * I'm sorry if you perceived my response as hostile; it was not intended that way, and I regret that our interaction has gone so awry from your point of view. Since we go out of our way to keep our articles neutral in viewpoint, and free of public relations material: fluff generated by the subject's press agent or published by the subject, etc., I fear that your question "and why can this person do this without me being contacted first?!" was not received well, since it could be interpreted as conveying a sense of entitlement. I disagree, however, with Jeremy's characterization of it as "screaming", although of course I am not empowered to apologize on his behalf. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  20:13, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  00:01, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

DJ Octane
I am the Manager and Publicist for DJ Octane. He is a Music Producer and notable & popular american veteran DJ. He also has links to outside sources on the page i created. why would this be deleted -Barryshannon (talk) 21:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I would also suggest you stop writing about your client. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 21:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)


 * WP:MUSIC is very clear about the notability requirements for musical artists. WP:BLP is even more clear about 3rd party reliable sources for living persons.  Jeske has quite rightly noted conflict of interest. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 21:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:Amphibian and reptile articles needing a taxobox

 * Category no long empty, tag with emptycat when restored. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done as well as its parent Category:Animal articles needing a taxobox --Tikiwont (talk) 14:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Glacial World
It is really a saga of fantasy novels written by an Indian author. Though it has been published recently so it is not so famous. -HMHunt (talk) 09:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 09:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Flint Diao (singer)
The article was contested for speedy deletion (even though the article author was showing the support and the importance of the singer) and while I was still contesting it, the article was directly deleted (one minute after the administrator contested it) even though that I'm not yet done. He didn't even give me a little time to contest it, one minute isn't enough for me to write a long speech to deny what he just contested. Hope you'll consider this request. -Winion (talk) 11:55, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. If you disagree you should bring this up with the deleting administrator, NawlinWiki, because here is for uncontroversial stuff. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Kotura
This is a true company formed in 2004 and functioning in advanced technology (fiberoptics). Kotura is currently involved in the Ultraperformance Nanophotonic Intrachip Communications (UNIC) program is a project of DARPA. It is dedicated to funding projects by chip makers to create nanophotonic microprocessors. On March 3, 2008, Sun Microsystems announced that it had received a USD$44.29M grant from UNIC for a "five and a half-year research project focused on microchip interconnectivity via on-chip optical networks enabled by Silicon photonics and proximity communication[1]"; this project also involves collaboration with Luxtera, Kotura, Stanford University and the University of California, San Diego. Ultraperformance Nanophotonic Intrachip Communications Please consider the reinstatement. -Dchang26 (talk) 22:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.  Salvio  Let's talk about it! 01:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Buraidah College of TechnologyLogo.png
I tagged the file as a duplicate when I should have tagged the other one, now that it has been deleted, could an admin copy the fair use rationales to File:TVTCLogo.png? (No need to restore) -&mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done. FUR rationales copied to your talk page. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 10:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

murl thrush
reasoning -Philogelt (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

murl thrush was a signifigant man in the nys public school athletic program he got wrestling instituted as a sport- he also was the new york athletic clubs wrestling coach and he helped change their religious and racial discrimonation- he won 2 city championships in 2 different sports and taught at stuyvesant high school in nyc for 36 years please let me know what i can do so the article can be published many will contribute to it as so many people of my era are his lifelong fans
 * I've taken the liberty of fixing the report as well. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

E_STRICT
I found a reference to this page here, suggesting that there was available source for testing. I recognize this is not the appropriate forum for storage of source code, and the page was deleted according to WP:NOTDIC. That said, I believe php.net is the appropriate forum. It is my intent to post the relevant sections of the deleted page to php.net as a comment on the documentation. As such, they would fall under a CC-BY 3.0 license, which I believe is compatible with Wikipedia. Also, I would attribute the text to WP & its authors. (I'll even list all the authors if you give me the page history too.) In order to do this, I'm requesting that the deleted page be emailed to me. Based on the date of the posting on php.net, I'd appreciate it if I could have the revision that was visible on 26-Nov-2008 06:39. My email address is confirmed, so you can reach me through Special:EmailUser/PolicyReformer. Thank you!! ---Policy Reformer(c) 20:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ - text and history emailed. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you!--Policy Reformer(c) 20:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File:MadhulikaLiddle (2).JPG
this photo belongs to my wife Madhulika lIddle and I am unable to link this to her page Madhulika Liddle -Tarun73 (talk) 04:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I also suggest you stop writing about your significant other. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 05:39, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Jesse Dirkhising image
Hello. I would like the deleted image for the article Murder of Jesse Dirkhising restored. The image of Jesse was nominated and deleted here. No mention of its nomination or deletion was ever discussed on the talk page for the article. Furthermore, there was no consensus for it being deleted by User:Fastily in the first place. The nominee (User:SchuminWeb) claimed it was a non-free image, yet the media used the same picture for years. How are we to get free images from a murder victim? It's not possible. I see a disturbing double standard here. Why keep non-free images such as: File:Matthew Shepard.jpg and File:LawrenceFobesKing.jpg and not Jesse Dirkhising? Those last two are not free images so why keep them? If Jesse can be deleted for not being free, then Matthew and Larry must also be deleted for the exact same reasons. Otherwise please restore the image of Jesse Dirkhising. Thank you.  Caden  cool  23:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Restore and relist for broader discussion. The image meets 9 of the 10 WP:NFCC (including WP:NFCC -- portraits of dead people are assumed to meet this, and especially so in this case). The argument is that it does not meet WP:NFCC ("would significantly increase readers' understanding"). Do portraits meet WP:NFCC or are they merely decorative? I don't know. It's arguable that they do, I think. It would be very simple to resolve this kind of issue by adding (something like) the following to WP:NFCC: "Portraits are assumed to not meet this criterion, absent some extraordinary circumstance". (An extraordinary circumstance would be Cyrano de Bergerac for instance). The absence of such a clause indicates that the matter is not settled. The precedent cited was Caylee Anthony and that was contentious. I will bring this up presently at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content and perhaps we can get consensus that portraits don't meet WP:NFCC, but in the meantime this warrants a re-discussion. Herostratus (talk) 01:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The RfC is here: Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 52/Archives/ 41 Herostratus (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Geez, Herostratus ... you've never been to WP:REFUND before? We don't work like WP:DRV so save those argument styles for WP:DRV. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * @Herostratus. Thank you for the RFC. @BWilkins. Wow!  Caden  cool  20:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * @Bwilkins -- you're right. No, I haven't been here before, to my recollection. You're right, this should be at DRV and not Requests for Undeletion, so I'll move the discussion there, and in the meantime this can be thread can be closed, if I understand aright. Herostratus (talk) 06:19, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Bubble Babble
I would like a copy of it in my userspace, or alternatively it emailed to me, so that I can merge it with other pages and create something more useful. -Allens (talk) 05:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I have explained on my talkpage. Spartaz Humbug! 08:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I see. I'd like a copy in my userspace, or it emailed to me, for my personal usage (including but not limited to future policy discussions of changes/clarifications of what is considered a reliable source). There isn't any question of copyright violation or libelous material against a living person, so I trust you'll do this. Allens (talk) 15:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have e-mailed a copy of the article - it would not have been appropriate to userfy it, as it was AFD'd, and "userfy" was not the consensus at the time ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 15:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Michael Capponi
The page was proposed for deletion by November 7 for describing the article as acting like a reference. G11 was referenced as a reason for speedy deletion on November 7 before changes could be made. I am a supporter and contributor to this article and there have been numerous verifiable references to the article that have been cited. I created the page initially and others had also been adding to this page. Also the page has been up for over 6 months, and yesterday I added another page Capponi Construction Group that may have appeared to have been written like an advertisement and was linked to this page (because it said this page Michael Capponi was an orphan) so I created the Capponi Construction Group page since this is one of the companies this individual owns. -Cometcomputing (talk) 06:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note that the inclusion of sources has no bearing on a G11 deletion. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Would you be able to restore it temporarily or to draft mode so I can at least grab the content off so I can revise it? Thank you. Mryayo8 (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not an admin myself, however one could email the contents to you. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 23:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * What a piece of junk advertising. He's not notable without the article below, and even that's pushing it. So, you can either work on the one below and include Micheal and try and create something valid, or this specific article.  I would not be willing to allow this back on Wikipedia servers, even in draft mode all considering. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 23:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

It's not advertising or meant to be advertising, it was a list of all his accomplishments and he is a known celebrity in south beach as well as a philanthropist. Could you at least email the content to me so I can re-write parts of it or provide a draft so we can see the references? Thanks that way I don't have to start over, I had been adding to this article over the last 6 months and haven't really had any issues with it. Michael has done some pretty amazing things for the community and south beach in general. Please help out a fellow Canadian wise BWilkins, much appreciated! If you could provide any guidance that would be greatly appreciated since it looks like you have been on Wikipedia for a long time, and it would be great to learn how to write articles properly. Mryayo8 (talk) 04:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I was the admin who deleted the article, and I am emailing you the text, which I think will meet your requirements. You didn't even have to come here--had you asked me on my talk page, I would have done it. (I think it would need such total rewriting that there's no point in putting it in user space as is--it will be better to use some of the references and a small amount of the material to write it from scratch.) In my opinion, he's   notable, so there is no reason why it should not be possible to write a satisfactory   article, and the possibility of doing so will be much greater if you start over. I've started a page for the purpose  in your userspace at    User:Mryayo8/Michael Capponi with the infobox, so you will not have to code it over again.   Please see your user talk page for some advice about how to improve it; I'm perfectly willing to do anything reasonable to assist you, if you rewrite in good faith.  DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you DGG very much appreciated, so I can start working on this. Mryayo8 (talk) 05:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Capponi Construction Group
The page was proposed for deletion by November 7 for describing the article as acting like a reference. G11 was referenced as a reason for speedy deletion on November 7 before changes could be made. I am a supporter and contributor to this article and there have been numerous verifiable references to the article that have been cited. I created the page initially and should have left it in draft mode since there was more information I needed to add to it, but it was seen as written like an advertisement. Please restore to a draft mode so I can make the edits necessary. -Cometcomputing (talk) 06:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Google cache shows only one reference (a press release) and the article would need improvement to survive AFD but it doesn't look like "unambiguous advertising or promotion". Peter E. James (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

✅ Userfied at User:Cometcomputing/Capponi Construction Group. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * as your user name has changed, It's been moved to User:Mryayo8/Capponi Construction Group   DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Bill Ufo Hunter
The article is about a film -Baratus (talk) 15:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Seems that the article is going to be deleted because is an information about a website, but is not like that. The information that I wrote in wikipedia is about a 3D animation shortfilm. Its true that i didnt put more links about the film, but is because Imdb didnt include the film yet. Anyway, Imdb.com go to include this film in their website. This film is not so famous, and there is not many articles about the film in internet (i didnt saw very much things about it), but this is not free publicity about a website, is just information about a film. I hope that you can see it. Other reason because there is not many information is because is a totally free shortfilm, is not a commercial movie, but I think that is not a reason to delete the article. A greeting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baratus (talk • contribs)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Wikipedia does not accept original research or articles for which there do not exist reliable sources of information. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;  Talk  15:15, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Not to mention IMDb is not a reliable source and thus is unusable here. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Terry Daniels
Heavyweight Boxer who fought Joe Frazier and is linked on Joe Fraziers page. page is a proposed deletion -162.111.235.34 (talk) 15:49, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted five years ago, and could not be undeleted now as it would violate WP:BLP ... there's not a single reference on the article. Someone could, perhaps, create a new article with proper references. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 15:52, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm forced to agree. The deleted article was an unsalvageable BLP and POV nightmare, However, any logged in editor is free to write a new sourced article from a neutral point of view. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

FuturLab
CSD A7 claimed but notability likely:, , User talk:Kalvinlyle. - -- Trevj (talk) 10:07, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Minor nitpick here. A7 is about "importance or significance" not "notability". The entire article read FuturLab is a game development company in Brighton, UK. They made Coconut Dodge. The only thing this tells you is that this is a "game development company" that made something called "coconut dodge". (what is coconut dodge) I would have tagged/deleted this as A7 too. I suspect that if you were to write another article stating what makes this company significant and/or what sets it apart from all the other game development companies, it would not be tagged for A7 (or if it was the tag should be declined). --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Max Kaur (Jermakov)
This article was deleted despite the discussion with given questions and provided facts. We see that discussion transformed in constructive to political debate. Max Kaur (Jermakov) meets the requirements: This man is involved into Estonian politics for at least 15 years. Former vice-mayor of the town of Maardu. At the moment, this politician is a Chairman of the Law Enforcement Commission of the City Council of the Capital of Estonia (both it is a serious position considering that Tallinn is the Cultural Capital of Europe, 2011). Just to mention - Mr. Kaur was political advisor of the head of the popular party "Centre Party" Mr. Edgar Savisaar (I am not trying to use invalid criteria "That person A has a relationship with well-known person B", but I would like to mention that he was Estonian Prime minister from 1990 to 1992, got most of the votes at Parliament elections in 2011, at the moment - mayor of Capital of Estonia, ). He is most mentioned person of "Centre Party" in press. While the article and the politian we talk about met the requirements of "notability", our opponents started to use such expressions like "youth section of centre party", "small-time politician", "yellow journalism garbage", "his supporters should show up here... but this doesn't mean we need take what they say seriously" etc. It is absolutely non-professional and non-encyclopedic. We aren't discussing people. The article is about the well-respected man who is very famous in Tallinn and the main state of Estonia - Harjumaa, leading Institute of Society Development and giving lectures in ECOMEN institute in Tallinn. Moreover, this person has recommended himself on international area as a solid man, presenting Estonia in serious Worldwide organizations like International Human Rights Movement "World Without Nazism" (has offices Bruxelles, Moscow etc..), making lectures and reports - people of Estonia proud of such persons. I saw a lack of neutralism and justice while discussion. It was very abusively for me to hear such words like "supporter from youth section of party" from participants of so named discussion (it looked like a political debate). With a hope, I ask moderators to return the article. -Johannes xz (talk) 19:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done Should have been brought up with Spartaz and has now been listed at Deletion review/Log/2011 November 9. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:00, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

TinyRa1n
reasoning -1966bataman (talk) 01:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm fed up with this Speedy Deletion, All this Article tells you is about my service!!!!
 * ...and I'm fed up with WP:SPAM :-) ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 01:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

tabikap
The article was deleted for not having references and I found one: www.sotscm.org -Psa3rvb (talk) 23:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 07:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. it was not speedy deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Now deleted as a copyright violation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Comparison of Windows and Linux
Hi. I was wondering if it is possible to userify this article to my email address. I need small portions of it for another article but I have a hard time finding them with Bing. I do acknowledge the fact that this article has been a subject of three AfDs in the past and I promise I will not cause any trouble in that respect. Thanks in advance. -Fleet Command (talk) 18:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Userfication will not be easy as a bigdelete permission is required. Are you happy to get one revision + attribution list? I have emailed it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I am perfectly happy with what I received – thanks a lot – though I make neither head nor tail of what you said. I guess I had better steer clear of the word "Userification" in the future. Fleet Command (talk) 09:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfication would be to restore it as User:FleetCommand/Comparison of Windows and Linux. This would require a steward to do this undelete as it has so many revisions in its history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:05, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Sevonica
Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Sevonica is tied historically and currently to many other bands in the Memphis, Austin and Los Angeles music scene. This not only includes current and past bands but also successful producers, management and labels. Sevonica is a key piece to the early 2000's post core music scene and modern alternative rock scene. It's members have worked with multi-platinum selling artists such as Guns N Roses and Jackyl. It's past members are signed to licensing deals with MTV. To claim Sevonica is not musically relevant is to claim that any newer group that still has been able to perform at the acclaimed SXSW and digitally distribute a professional product is only relevant if they sell gold records. In this day and age that should no longer be the bar at which a band's relevance is judged. What is relevant is the body of work it's members have completed over many years and that influence on other bands and the industry itself. Additionally, WIKI has many bands that are unsigned and with much less content that this article. I am confident you will find this Sevonica article is well written and the sources are legitimate. You can only expect this article to grow over time along with those associated with it.

Thank you very much! Jason Babin -Mbabin1978 (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.. Relationships or not, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 01:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Not to belabor the point, but how is the following act more relevant to music and therefore maintains an article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_James

They have even fewer sources. Sevonica itself has attained as much credibility as this aforementioned article with SXSW and album releases alone. The sources are additionally valid within the Sevonica article. I mean, don't make me trout you! This is legitimate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbabin1978 (talk • contribs) — Mbabin1978 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The present existence of one article does not in any way justify the existence of any other article; see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If you think that other article fails our standards, then go ahead and nominate it for possible deletion. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  15:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

"If you think that other article fails our standards, then go ahead and nominate it for possible deletion. " ...looks like I'm going to be busy ; )

Zedbazi
reasoning -Sonax (talk) 20:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://wewantzedbazi.com/#about. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

The Grinning Man
The article regarding the cryptid was ignorantly deleted by Robsinden when he moved the Jonathan Creek episode of the same title into this space. Now, the history has been converted to the episode's history, not the previous cryptid article's, so it can't be reverted. There was an extensive discussion about the cryptid article's notability in which it was agreed that it was notable, so it didn't just get deleted, it got overwritten by someone not paying attention. I hope we can get the old article back. Thank you. Geeky Randy (talk) 04:19, 8 November 2011 (UTC) -Geeky Randy (talk) 04:19, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Not correct, Robsinden moved the JC episode article to what at the time was a red link. The article on the cryptid was deleted two months prior to that as a result of this AFD discussion. I think you owe Robsinden an apology. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:34, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * For future reference, how do I dig that kind of information up? Do I have to sort through endless pages of AfD articles, or can I search for it to make the process quicker?  Geeky Randy (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Just be aware that non-admins can't move articles on top of other articles. If you see something like this in the future just check the logs for the page which can be accessed from the "history" tab. In the case of this article, it will show that it was deleted before the current article was moved in its place. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Localization Industry Standards Association
This trade body has recently folded and removed all of it's content from the web (the domain name has expired and been purchased by an ad farm). It has played a role in the creation of a number of standards (such as ISO 12620). I believe that is was notable and that I can find sources for the page. Could the page please be userfied please? -Stuartyeates (talk) 07:24, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ to User:Stuartyeates/Localization Industry Standards Association. This was actually a PROD and could have been restored directly, but it is in such poor shape (a single sentence plus a link to their defunct web-site) that I have userfied it for you to improve - hardly worth digging up, but the history should be preserved. There is actually a rather fuller Russian article at ru:Localization Industry Standards Association, but that doesn't look as though it wil be a lot of help to you either. JohnCD (talk) 11:59, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I have raised this to the level of a well-sourced stub and move it back to the main article space, see Localization Industry Standards Association. Feedback welcome. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:42, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Barry "Reazar" Richards
reasoning -EliBrown6 (talk) 01:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Requesting that this page not be deleted. Subject is an important character in the development of the music business in his native Washington DC as well as other parts of the country. His television archive is among the most important music footage from the period 1968-1985, and is only now being re-discovered by the masses.


 * The page Barry "Reazar" Richards is unlikely to be salvageable unless in-depth, independent third party coverage of them can be found, see WP:MUSICBIO and WP:RS. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done, article has not been deleted. I removed a BLPPROD as sources have been added, but I've listed it at WP:Copyright problems as it's taken from the subject's Facebook page. January  ( talk ) 09:41, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Pure bending
 Pure Bending; this is a topic in mechanical engineering and needs some description. It is not in the Wikidictionary etc. and in fact Wikipedia is the ideal place for it to be described. I believe (but do not know) that it is when a plate is bent only through edge moments... ie, twisting at the edges. I don't know what the original article may have had in it but would like to know. -108.32.14.27 (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. It seems that the twcleanup tag was added by a bot 2 years ago but it was never actually transwikied. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)