Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 60

Holy Child College Obalende, History
am trying to complete the wiki page for the College -4olashade (talk) 02:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

I think I undid it and deleted it by mistake I am a new user to Wiki. I m not sure if the stub needed to be removed and how?


 * ❌ The article is not deleted. GB fan 03:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Marikit-Park-Olongapo.jpg
The file was deleted from the article of Olongapo due to Copyright issues. It was appropriately sent with an email containing the proof of copyright. The owner's permission was included in the email. No one replied nor verified about the status of the image, but was rather deleted. -War1addict (talk) 08:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * When the OTRS volunteer reads the email they will ask for restore. If there is a problem hopefully they will email you back.  If you sent the email to the wrong place take a read of WP:PERMIT. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Philadelphia University (Jordan)
because I am the owner of the Website and responsible for all the data and information -Philadelphia jordan (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please state your case at Articles for deletion/Philadelphia University (Jordan) as the article is not yet deleted. If you can prove that there is no copyright violation your case for retention is improved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * ..and therefore [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 18:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Please undo page deletion of stylishandtrendy
PROD -125.18.56.188 (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, in case he wishes to consider nominating it at WP:Articles for deletion. What the article needs is references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Farhan Zameer
There were two pages on wikipedia with same topics, I requested to delete one but accidently deleted the other one named "Farhan Zameer", which I want to undelete now -Farhan.zameer (talk) 19:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please see our guideline on editing pages you may be involved with. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It looks as if you blanked the page. This can easily be reversed if you look at the history and undo the edit, or pick an earlier version and edit that. Also Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Muhammad Farhan Zameer exists. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Hospice of Southern Illinois
The article was deleted because it was tagged as speedy deletion. I will review the page if possible, however I was unaware of the tag. I would at least like to be able to view the deleted page because I do not understand the reason for deletion. -Cjuehne (talk) 20:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done if you want to review the page, most of it came from here, http://www.hospice.org/about-us/mission/ GB fan 20:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

List of weather websites in the Philippines
This article was deleted while I was continuing to work on improving it. I had added more content to it, added more secondary and primary sources, reorganized its presentation, and re-titled it to List of weather agencies and websites in the Philippines, then it disappeared. I am pretty sure this article can be improved to meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. Requesting that a copy of this article be placed into my user space sandbox for more improvements, (at the bottom of the sandbox page). Also, please see my comments located at Articles for deletion/List of weather websites in the Philippines. Thank you for your consideration. - Northamerica1000 (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Northamerica1000/List of weather agencies and websites in the Philippines. Do not introduce the page back to main space without approval of the community though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

ICarly season 5
The page was deleted after being blanked and its content copied and pasted to iCarly (season 5). The edit history was lost in the process. Thanks. -Kevinbrogers (talk) 03:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ - cheers mate!   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 05:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Memeburn
reasoning -Angrynative (talk) 04:45, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Article was deleted for non notability. Reasoning for requesting undeletion is that the article can be userfied.
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Angrynative/Memeburn. It was actually deleted for no claim of importance. Notability may  or may not be a problem, as no one has checked yet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

April Masini
The Wikipedia article "April Masini" must be undeleted.

It is imperative that April Masini's Wikipedia page be made public. April Masini is one of the most esteemed executive producers in the United States. In addition, Masini is a published author, columnist, and relationship advice expert whose expertise has been featured in ELLE magazine, and Match.com. Her lists of credentials are extensive: http://www.askapril.com/press.html

Throughout her career, Masini has brought various film and television productions to Hawaii and financed them. This is turn brought in revenue for the local economy and created foot traffic to box offices across the globe. Her exceptional character has brought her to the attention of multiple television networks and productions, including The Bill O'Reilly Factor which she was an interviewee. April Masini was also hired by Old Spice to be their Voice of Experience - Dating and Relationship Editor in 2007, and served on their panel with NASCAR Champion Tony Stewart, among other exceptional accolades which can be found on her website www.askapril.com.

The initial deletion request was submitted by user Tokyogirl79. Members within the WIkipedia community that did not extensively research the validity of Masini's career achievements and stature allowed for this deletion to occur.

This is a quote within the Delete Request that acted as the catalyst for the April Masini Wikipedia page removal:

Weak delete. There are some articles that brush upon her claims, although many of them vary as far as how certain they are of how involved she really was. Most of them put far more emphasis on her husband being the deciding factor. [90], [91] I also want to note that she seems to be a mostly self-published author. The claims of notability are sort of vague, to be honest and probably could just be added to the Baywatch article. Most of her notability really seems to have stemmed from her being married to Mancini. After her divorce that notability sort of dried up, so I don't know how notable she is as far as she herself goes. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:12, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79 If someone can find information to show that she's notable I'm persuadable, but other than her possible influence over Baywatch I can't see where she's really notable. Just about everything about her on the web is either her website or a promotional blurb.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:15, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

The language used in this post is clearly subjective, and bears no evidence. There no resources listed that reveal evidence of user Tokyogirl79's claims against April Masini's character and career. A subjective claim such as this one should have been more extensively researched by the Wikipedia community members reviewing the deletion. April Masini's creditably is in her career history; her endorsements speak for themselves: http://www.askapril.com/april-masini-endorsements.html

The April Masini Wikipedia page must be undeleted. The current page entitled "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April Masini" must be removed from the Wikipedia site.

Thank you. -Gmhayes4 (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/April Masini, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 07:02, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Seinfeld logo.svg
This image, per WP:MCQ, is ineligible for copyrights, yet trademarks apply. Will you undo the removal of old revisions of this file, please? -George Ho (talk) 10:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please first request with, the administrator whole deleted these revisions.   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 02:31, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have recently contacted . --George Ho (talk) 03:01, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done by Maxim. --George Ho (talk) 03:50, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Sharif University of Technology Association
the page is quite useful as it reflects a large and important association with international scope -Bahram (talk) 15:25, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * This page has been userfied to User:Hamrolly/Sharif University of Technology Association. What are you looking to do?    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 16:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Raymond Aaron
As i have stated already, I was reading one of his novels and i really liked it so i thought of posting an article about the guy, but i found an already deleted article that time, so i edited that article and re posted it. Some of the users thought that i am the same guy and filed a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raymondaaron case against me. Various people checked and found out that i am a different person and the case was closed. I know the article was deleted previously that is why i edited the article a little, removed self praises and re posted it because that guy surely deserves a mention. -Nitishthelegendkiller (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌. Since that article was deleted after a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Raymond Aaron, any attempt to re-create it is liable to speedy deletion as a repost of deleted material, unless it is clearly different and overcomes the reasons for deletion at the AfD. Your best course would be to write a new article in your userspace at User:Nitishthelegendkiller/Raymond Aaron and then approach user, the admin who closed the AfD, to see whether he agrees that you have overcome the reaasons for deletion. If he does not agree, you can apply at WP:Deletion review. If you wish, I will userfy your deleted article for you to work on, but I suggest you might do better to start from a clean slate.


 * The important thing is to establish WP:Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones like his publisher, and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people independent of him thought him significant enough to write substantial comment about? See WP:Notability (people), especially WP:AUTHOR, and WP:42. JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Mohammad Nashir
Mohammad Nashir is a literary author and linguist, he has contributed on Amazon, by evidence available on the Amazon website, in addition his poetry has been published (see United Press Ltd and Forward Poetry Press) his noteworthy contributions are archived as noteworthy by the comment's who commonly praise his work. His Linguistic work is available on Livemocha on his profile, where he commonly dedicates his time to aiding people with his linguistic skills. He has many linguistic skills and has definitely aided research because of the highly-positive-feedback available on his methods, this page is not marketing or promotion whatsoever, Mohammad is an author and in addition freely shares his work and is a prestigious artist and academic. I hope you put up his page back up. I can display the work of the Academia and Research with positive reviews of his work and feedback, I hope you put up my latest page on him back up, thank you. -Tw3ak1t (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. The article was also completely unreferenced, which is not permitted under the biographies of living persons policy ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 19:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Shuto Con
Please undelete the Shuto Con page. I just wanted to add a listing to show we exist, just like all the other Anime Conventions on the list shown here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anime_conventions. I am not trying to promote or advertise Shuto Con, I am just trying to give a link to the listing on the list. -ShutoCon (talk) 18:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:General notability guideline and WP:What Wikipedia is not. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)


 * WP:PROMO and WP:COI. Editor blocked as representing an org. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 19:50, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Hannah Cornett
''undelete page request, sources deleting page, an uncredited source and celebrity dirty blog "deadpan", are currently being sued for fraud, defamation of character, and more. They did not have any authority to delete Hannah Cornett for history of a pro-athete, actress, model, producer. All sources were credited including, awards, magazine cover photos, clips of films and television, sources for her pro-athlete career and more. She is a style icon who also runs a charity, helping over 300 youth in difficult situations. She has been on wikipedia for over 6 years and a dirty celebrity blog being sued for defamation has no right to ask for the removal of her site. Please review this request and we are not looking for public response, we are looking for a credited authority on wikipedia.'' -76.202.69.142 (talk) 19:36, 19 January 2012 (UTC)


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Hannah Cornett, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 19:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Images of Taxi (TV series)
These above images were wrongfully deleted. I don't know how they were deleted, but some IP editor must have horribly removed them from this article. --George Ho (talk) 23:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I have restored the first two in good faith. The third is a smaller duplicate of the first. Cheers,    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 00:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

London Prepares series
it seems to be a notable topic, and has been linked to from various Wikiprojects. Happy to have it userfied, really just want to see if there's a useful starting point there or if it's better to start from scratch. (Originally deleted as created by a banned user) -Paulbrock (talk) 17:18, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ - userfied to User:Paulbrock/London Prepares series. Cheers!    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 00:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * excellent, thanks. More than I thought it would be.  Will hopefully have it as a useful new article by the end of the weekend Paulbrock (talk) 00:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Steven A Williams
The article was originally deleted as it wasn't adequately referenced. I would like it undeleted to restore references and have Steve's profile made public again. Thank you. -94.172.13.84 (talk) 11:05, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Steven A Williams, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 11:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Repeal Citizen's United
This article states facts, the Citizen's decision is controversial, there is a petition currently pending on the white house site, in order to sign petitions one must create an account. These are all facts that can be easily verified.

the article contains facts only -Michaelanarchist (talk) 17:11, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌. Wikipedia is not for advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind. This article was not purely factual: it was a campaign appeal, ending: "We must get the President to take a stand on this important issue. Please visit the the White House site, create an account at We, the People and then go to the following link and sign the petition:" JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Kristian Bertel
reasoning -Kristian Bertel 21:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, see WP:Autobiography. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 21:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Beware also of WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIO ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 12:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Paigah_(Hyderabad)
There is no dipute in this article, every contributer have shared the best of knowledge they have about our family and there is no disagreement from any branch, this article describes my family lineage in every possible details, I request the Administrator to please restore the page for our future generations to have knowledge about there ancestors, my identity is as follows: Paigah/Sir Khurshid Jahi Paigah/Nawab Imam Jung Bahadur/Nawab Mohammed Karim Uddin Khan Shamshir Jung Bahadur Jung Bahadur/Nawab Md Ejaz Uddin Khan Bahadur/Nawab Md Hamed Uddin Khan, kindly do the needful. Thanks and Regards -Mdhamed99 (talk) 10:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ... although what you state above is exactly what NOT to do with Wikipedia (it's not a place for geneology or family trees, and articles should not be edited by people with WP:COI), the article has not been deleted. It was up for deletion discussion, but survived with the understanding that geneology stuff was to be removed ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 12:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

ADFM
It was deleted because it had few notability before. But looking through Google now I see much notability. Therefore, I can fix general errors in the article, and add more notability.Dipankan In the woods? 11:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/ADFM so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here. If you have new information, you should first approach user, the administrator who closed the deletion discussion; then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Roger-Luc Chayer
Inclusion in the classical music portal since he is a notable french horn player and update on his music career -Edito514 (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC) I will do that, thank you Bwilkins --Edito514 (talk) 16:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The article had not yet been deleted when you brought it to our attention - it has now been deleted. First, as a biography of a living person, it absolutely must be referenced by reliable sources.  Second, as this is the English Wikipedia, the article should be in English, not French.  Although I personally could have translated it, there was nothing worth translating - especially considering the above.  My recommendation: make a draft of the article in your userspace.  When you think it's ready to go, ask a few trusted editors if it is, indeed, ready.  Pay close attention to WP:FIRSTARTICLE ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 16:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Living In Peru
'* 'I am still in the process of writing the pages. I had to leave home for a few hours before i could finish writing the pages. Please put them back up so I can finish writing/editing. They are not for promotional purposes. I live in the United States, and I wanted to put a Wiki up for a few different things I enjoyed/experienced when I was in Peru and since I have left Peru. It is informational, not promotional. -Pureimaginari (talk) 03:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC) -Pureimaginari (talk) 03:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That is the textbook definition of promotion as far as Wikipedia is concerned. We aren't a travel agency. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 03:44, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Autoluminescent
recent film documenting important Australian musical history! Why was this deleted in the first place? How offensive to have deleted this. Here, some information on this film: http://www.abc.net.au/arts/stories/s3395725.htm and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpP9iWupUo0 - thank you. -114.74.156.138 (talk) 04:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The article was not about a film, it was about a non-notable song from Teenage Snuff Soundtrack. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Okay, thank you, I understand now that this page was not about the 2011 Australian film, the subject of which is Rowland S. Howard (in fact that's a song from his first solo album - http://www.liberation.com.au/shop/item/1202/teenage-snuff-film) -- and how does one, then, begin a new article on this same page/address for the 2011 film 'Autoluminescent'? Thanking you in anticipation.


 * A registered user can create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, or an unregistered user can start an article for creation ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 12:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Stanley_Kubrick/Sandbox
It was restored, Thank you. Puddytang (talk) 07:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Puddytang/Stanley_Kubrick.

Andrew Weinreich
The article "Andrew Weinreich" was proposed to be deleted, but there were no objections for 7 days. There is no valid reason for deletion. The article is in accordance with your terms of service. Unfortunately the administrator "Fastily" who authorized the deletion will be unavailable from January 23rd to February 8th. This 2 week period is the only time in which we are able to rectify this deletion. -InsideSiliconAlley (talk) 18:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It was proposed for deletion because of "Apparent self-promotion violating notability requirements"...which is the reason for deletion, not the 7 days. Although a contested PROD, I'm concerned about undeleting something that may not meet WP:BLP guidelines ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 19:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

GNU AutoGen


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_code_generation_tools#cite_note-0

This refers to a number of open source code generators that have pages. Someone got a bee in his bonnet about mine and pushed and pushed until it was removed. Please see, for example,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMDX

I do not have time to vigorously defend my contribution. For software programs, I think you ought to consider widespread usage in lieu of widespread citations in refereed journals. -Bkorb (talk) 19:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for pointing out another article that can be deleted for lack of sourcing. Please note that popularity is by no means objective notability. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Marketplace Mall
User:Fastily deleted this page under G6, making way for an uncontroversial move, but no such move occurred, and I can't tell what page was going to be moved. I can't even tell what the content of this page used to be -- if it used to be a redirect or a disambiguation page, or what. Fastily is unavailable beginning today, so I cannot ask Fastily directly to undelete it or for clarification. -Powers T 20:44, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please undelete the talk page, as well. Powers T 20:45, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Done GB fan 20:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Gagnongrave.jpg
This image file was deleated in that I missed for failing to log in to notice prior to January 1 and today. I had no chance to respond to any concerns about the file. I cannot speak with the admin, User:Fastily, who deleted it as they are away from Wikipedia until sometime in February. This image file was created by myself from two photographs, front and back, of the headstone of Iwo Jima flag raiser, Rene Gagnon, at Arlington National Cemetery. I believe I had released its rights to CC. This image was determined, somehow, to be "3D Art," among other issues, which I could have addressed had I time to respond. The Rene Gagnon article is now missing this illustrative photograph as a result of the deletion. Please undelete this image file. Thank you. ~ (The Rebel At) ~ 15:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC) - ~ (The Rebel At) ~  15:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Administrators will not restore pages here that were the subject of a deletion discussion; try WP:Deletion review instead. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 02:18, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Jeremy. I had thought I'd found the right place to request an undeletion.  I'll try your link. ~ (The Rebel At) ~  15:14, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Ghulam Raza Bhatti
Ghulam Raza Bhatti is a notable academician from Pakistan. He has received the Highest academic rank of Pakistan i.e. Meritorious Professor. He is the Founder of Pakistan's first botanical garden and center for biodiversity and conservation. Therefore, his notability cannot ignored. -116.71.15.116 (talk) 18:49, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Based on the deletion rationale, the article (along with many others) was deleted because it was created by a rampant copyright violator. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Vinci hair clinic
reasoning -Sumon Rahman 03:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Honorable Admin,

Hope you well and doing good. Sir after a very hard research I've write the article "Vinci Hair Clinic" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinci_hair_clinic), Sir I did very hard work for the last 2 months to publish this article regards of A good number of students are looking for study about Hair Care, a huge people are suffering Hair problem, kin problem, Breast Surgery, Facial Surgery, Hair transplants and many more. Sir I believe there's no chance to promote any website or business here on Wikipedia, but with full confidence I can tell you that this article is not promoting any business or website! Sir I'll very very grateful to you if you kindly stop the "Deletion" of VInci page.

I promise you that If there any kind of changes, edits can save this "Deletion" I'll do, I'm ready to do! Sir just let me know what can I do to save this page. Sir there are some same kind of pages on WIkipedia published:


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hair_care
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hair_Club
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vindon_Healthcare
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hair_transplantation

If they can live on WIkipedia so why not mine :'-( Sir just provide me a chance.

Looking for your soonest kind reply.

Sincerely Sumon Rahman


 * If you can't see how the above is blatantly promotional, you won't be able to write in the neutral tone Wikipedia requires. Also, Article X CAN NOT be used to justify Article Y - all articles must stand or fall on their own merits. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 07:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * If people need to read encyclopedic articles about the topics, they can actually go to those articles - they certainly do not need to be directed to a corporate entity that does those - Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 12:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * User has recreated article content, tagged for CSD under A7, G11. Gsingh (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Stanley_Kubrick/Sandbox
The editors of Stanley Kubrick were using this page to store some material that they may want to use in a future re-write of the article. When I created the associated page, Stanley_Kubrick/Sandbox, it was deleted, and the talk page was deleted because it was a talk page associated with a deleted article. Please help us recover our work that was stored on the talk page! Puddytang (talk) 16:45, 23 January 2012 (UTC) -Puddytang (talk) 16:45, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm a little concerned about the original sandbox: it appears to have been a copy/paste from the original article - thus violating all the attribution principles that are required. Second, this appears to have barely been done a day ago ... how much work happened in those few hours? ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 17:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I created the main page yesterday, but the Talk page has been in existence since October or earlier (it was moved from a different page). All of the citations should still be in the copied text. A lot of work has been going into this article, but a lot of work still needs to be done. Editors need this material for the citations and resources it contains that can be used in future re-writes, as well archived discussions about why certain sections were deleted. It is not anyone's intention to put material into the article without proper attribution. We are trying to make sure that everything in the article is backed up by Reliable sources. Puddytang (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The material originally in the earliest URL Talk Sandbox was there for many weeks with ongoing discussion and of two kinds:
 * 1) material copied and pasted from the original article for proposed rewrites and sometimes (though not always) deleted from the original article in the process.
 * 2) user comments on the rewriting process.
 * I thought the purpose of a sandbox was test-edits. As such, I am mystified by the objection of copy/paste from the original article. To write a later draft, you want the original as a reference. That's what a sandbox is for!! What's all this about attribution principles?--WickerGuy (talk) 18:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The 'Stanley Kubrick/Sandbox' page was created only yesterday and was more or less a complete copy of the artilce (Puddytang did that to work on trimming it). 'Talk:Stanley Kubrick/Sandbox', however, has been in use since October, and was where we were storing material taken out of the article. It was just snippets of text, with some discussion inbetween. The reason it was created at that namespace was as an extension of the SK talk page. If this is too confusing however, I'm sure we can just relocate it to one of our own userspaces. --Lobo512 (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello? Clearly it was deleted by mistake. The only reason it is not fixed is that the User:Fastily is away from the Wikipedia. Could someone please restore or recover the text? Puddytang (talk) 04:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Southern toc logo.png
Will be deleted on commons (UK logo), PD in USA, please restore and replace now commons template with [[Template:Do not move to Commons] -Bulwersator (talk) 08:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

C-Real (band)
They are a kpop group that debuted October 2011, so I don't understand why their wiki page was deleted. -128.205.161.218 (talk) 11:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * A few things: first, the article was deleted via two separate article for deletion discussions, so it cannot be undeleted here. Second, the notability requirements for bands are very strict - you have admitted they just debuted in Oct 2011, so it's very difficult to become notable according to standards in that short of time.  Third, the article was sent for "incubation" until notability was actualy established...so in a way, it's not deleted, but it's also not an active article yet ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DATA_Inc.
reasoning -Gnikanorov (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

To whom it may concern,

I recently started a page to chronicle the history of the DATA Inc. organization and what it has done over the past several years. This includes history, recognition, etc. A Wikipedia reviewer ended up flagging this page for deletion without what I deem as a proper review. After appealing for him to re-read the page, and if necessary, let me know what needs to be corrected, he stated that I should appeal my case to the main administrators.

Based on this recommendation, I am bringing my request to you to undelete the page, re-analyze and render a final decision...and if not, to please userfy the page under my account and outline exactly where the problem lies, so I can correct it appropriately.

Please let me know as soon as possible.

Thank you...
 * — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 01:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Kritika Kamra
The reason for deleting this page was: "She's only been in the one show, and that started in January of this year. A smattering of minor references in the Indian press." It has been 18 months since and a lot has changed. She is a very popular actress on indian television now. Search on google and no for yourself :) -106.51.76.255 (talk) 21:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Kritika Kamra, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Hollyhurst
reasoning -202.154.141.21 (talk) 03:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

This page is true.


 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Hollyhurst, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 03:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Override (Transformers)
Can you please userify this article so I can work on it? Thanks. -Mathewignash (talk) 01:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Mathewignash/Override (Transformers). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I used the material in there to help write this article http://en.wikialpha.org/wiki/Override_(Transformers), I believe I have it properly referencing the Wikipedia article licensing. Mathewignash (talk) 21:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Andy_Pickford_Music
a page about Andy Pickford (musician) is required because Andy Pickford (myself) has been a recording musician for 20 years. I have released over a dozen albums, received regular airplay and regarded as an important composer in the field of synthesiser instrumental music -95.149.182.223 (talk) 14:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You might have missed some of the core concepts of Wikipedia here - first, you may not write articles about yourself. Second, your userpage does not belong to you, it belongs to the Foundation, and cannot be used to promote yourself.  Third, if you have been blocked, you may not either create a new account, nor edit anonymously because the block applies to you the person.  Fourthly, your original username is invalid as it represents an organization. Finally, as highly as you regard your body of work, WP:MUSIC has very very clear guidelines to notability - if you are as important as you say, then someone totally unrelated to you would be working on an article ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 14:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Colin Tarrant
The administrator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Athaenara) who deleted this page on the grounds that Colin "is not a notable actor" was mistaken in my view. Over the course of a decade I had the pleasure of directing Colin in the UK Tv series, "The Bill" and can assure you that his portrayal of Police Inspector Monroe was superb. Lest it be thought that is all Colin can do, think again. I have seen him in many other productions - he's a very good actor. Given that all the others on the "List of the Bill characters" page were not deleted, perhaps you can tell me why Mr. Tarrant was singled out? Many thanks. -195.137.96.77 (talk) 15:24, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * He wasn't "singled out"; the prod on his article expired. However, please see WP:Notability (people) and WP:Biographies of living persons. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 18:24, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. What the article needs is references to reliable sources to confirm notability - see WP:NACTOR. IMDB is not considered enough. JohnCD (talk) 19:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

The Southside Six
"It is the longest distance running race in Scotland's largest city!" -Nnnnvvvv (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 23:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Capital Factory
I would like to see what is already there for a possible attempt at a new article. -Scott Illini (talk) 02:18, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Scott Illini/Capital Factory. If you built on it, use the move option later on, otherwise you can tag it with db-userreq. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Ilovethebeach.com
reasoning -Paulmcanders (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Two of my pictures : File:Members 01 sm.jpg and File:Ilbeach.jpg will be deleted if my page is not put back online. I would like for either my pictures online in my user page or for the article to be put back to the main page. Thank You

Paulmcanders (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The page already exists at User:Paulmcanders/Ilovethebeach.com. Please note that our userpage policy expressly forbids nonfree media files within userspace; you will need to make do without them for now and reupload them later. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 06:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done What Jeremy said. Fair use images to improve articles only, not articles to justify images. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

The Weekly Post
Article originally deleted as an expired prod, can meet notability guidelines as the primary source of record for Wayne County, NC -RadioFan (talk) 15:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Georgetown University Alumni & Student Federal Credit Union
I didn't notice this was nominated until after it was soft deleted without discussion. The Washington Post featured this student-run bank just last year, and BusinessWeek also did a piece highlighting it. Being the oldest, largest, and most successful in its category doesn't automatically confer notability, but that sure does help! - Patrick, o Ѻ ∞ 18:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done By the closing admin, Stifle. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Phillip Klinger


This article should not have been deleted. Firstly it was not a hoax, if you will undelete it I will add references to verify the information. Secondly the fact that you cannot find reference to Mr Klinger or his company is because he does not pay tax and has had himself removed from the electoral reigster, as well as the fact that his company is listed in Israel, in Hebrew, whilst he doesn't have an office there most english speakers cannot speak Hebrew, thus it is ideal for him so few people know. I know all this as I was his secretary for 14 years, until 2011. Please undelete my page immediately, it was not a hoax as you suggested.

Additionally if I am to add references I need this article to be restored so that I can edit it -Badgerkli (talk) 21:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment from deleting admin. Article was deleted under criterion CSD G3, blatant hoax. Some of the claims were so outrageous that the article was deleted as a hoax, rather than going the route of a prod for a BLP without sources. No objection to creation of a new article, but only on the condition that reliable sources are presented as the article is being created. —C.Fred (talk) 22:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * As per my agreement with both the BLP and hoax aspects above ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 13:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Grange Co-op
I would first like to see what is in the article to perhaps update/fix to be more informative. -Getfive (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have e-mailed the contents to you ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 13:10, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * As Getfive seems to have used the content for recreation, I've restored the history as well. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

CYMA Systems
Company is a legitimate organization. Our awards were not cited, but they exist. User Explicit never responded to multiple undeletion requests. We will remove recognition section -98.191.115.39 (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Although an expired WP:PROD, this article was deleted almost a year ago due to it being unreferenced, and highly promotional in nature (WP:CSD). As the creators were asked to fix the citing issues at least 6 months before deletion, this deletion was viable.  If you disagree, you may take this to WP:DRV, but please read WP:DELETE and WP:COI in order to better understand both your role, and the arguements to use/not use in (un)deletion discussions ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 13:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

paul chow
Not an insignificant footballer in non league England. He has scored in three finals running, equal fourth highest goal scorer at his club. i believe the person deleting this record doesnt knwo the topic adequately -86.47.54.234 (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "non league"? We have rather strict requirements for athletes, espcially as listed under WP:FOOTY ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 12:59, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

SM City Olongapo
The article's reason for deletion was because of Insufficient notability and lack of sources. SM City Olongapo will be the very first SM Mall to be opened in Olongapo and in the whole province of Zambales in the Philippines. It will feature 7 levels of mall area, about 42,000 sq. m. The mall will be grandly opened in 10 Days so the article has to be there already. At first I didn't noticed that it was nominated for deletion so I made this edit and it was reverted back. To expand the article further, I can merge the information that was made available on an earlier version of the article here with corrections and appropriate references, if this request has been approved SM City San Fernando already has an article but it will not yet open until March 2012, so I don't see the reason why can't SM City Olongapo have its own article this time. -War1addict (talk) 12:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing out that SM City San Fernando should not have its own article yet either - I have redirected it back to its parent company as well due to WP:CRYSTAL ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 13:06, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * So the mall have to be fully opened first before it can have an article of its own? --War1addict (talk) 13:27, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The mall has to be notable before it can have an article ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 14:58, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Lab4
Dear Sir,I was part of a band called Lab4 from 1994 - 2007. There was a wikipedia page for the band that also connected to the many other projects and releases that I was involved in. I did not create the page(s) myself. I don't know who did but the band was very successful during it's time playing on BBC Radio 1 for John Peel as well as righting music for Reebok, Bacardi, Polaroid etc. and being voted best live act in Mixmag in early 2000. Can you tell my why all this seems to have been deleted with no record of it's deletion?Thanks,Adam Newman. -Adamlab4 (talk) 13:37, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * With respect to the lack of record, the article was at Lab 4, now fixed above. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:10, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * As for the deletion reason, it was for of asserting sufficient importance. You may want to review the relevant guideline WP:MUSIC and then either bring this up with Alexf how deleted it or ask me here for restoration to a common space where independent editors can have a second look and try to improve it. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

XtraDB
There are some reliable sources about xtraDB, for example http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7356/ The xtraDB is open-source fork of InnoDB storage engine which can be used in MySQL and in forks of MySQL: MariaDB, Percona. Page was deleted: 22:58, 11 March 2011 Y (revisions| contribs) deleted "XtraDB" ‎ (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (talk) 14:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * There may be good sources out there but inside the deleted article was only a press release and some hype. Actually, not every software fork needs a wikipedia fork and InnoDB is rather short. For a separate article, I'd start from scratch but if you still want it userfied drop a note here. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Roddie Clark
Wish to work on the article in my userspace, to bring up to scratch. Was procedurally "speedy" deleted under a G7 because I sent it to AfD (in good faith, to test its notability). -PorridgeGobbler (talk) 09:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Fails notability test in WP:FOOTY ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 13:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Lamar Smith.jpg
Deleted as unused fair-use image by Orphaned image deletion bot, following vandalism on Lamar Smith (activist), which went undetected for too long -William Avery (talk) 23:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --Tikiwont (talk) 09:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Matthew Pace
reasoning -70.191.184.182 (talk) 08:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Not only can Matthew Pace and Pace PC Solutions be verified, Matthew is a registered partner with Microsoft and a Certified Apple Associate (you can check the registry at apple.com. In Google the Pace PC Website has been given Site Links and performs locally in the Northwest region of Florida. Third party resources can be confirmed with Microsoft's partner registry and Apple's certification registry. Information about Pace PC Solutions and Matthew Pace and also be verified with www.sunbiz.org, Florida's official Division of Corporations where official documents have been filed since April 17, 2008 and yearly thereafter. In my personal opinion, I believe Matthew Pace should reinstated on Wikipedia on the grounds that this information can be verified. Basing decisions on whether there are a large number of Google Direct Hits or not, does not seem to be a reliable way of determining eligibility.
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Although a contested PROD, the "references" were fake (nonexistent), and being a certified Apple associate and/or Microsoft associate is only useful in LinkedIN ... not on an encyclopedia of knowledge.  The notability guidelines are what are used to determine eligibility for an encyclopedia article - and this guy just does not appear important, nor does his company. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 13:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)