Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 68

Jackson Harris
notable artist with many national articles and reviews written about them. Toured across USA, has millions of views on YouTube and large fan base. How can this be up for deletion? -SSMNYCWIKI (talk) 18:36, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done Well ssmedianyc and their affiliate accounts didn't really make that clear, somebody nominated it and it got deleted per a somewhat poor discussion. Right now it can't be undeleted here as uncontroversial, see top of page. Suggestion: wait for some fan to do it better. Or change user name, prepare a draft and go to deletion review if you see fit.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Didn't make what clear? There were plenty of links to National articles (not sure when this was deleted but can confirm that when it was created, there were many articles posted). Where is the "somewhat poor discussion"? And how can I get a copy of the old article to add more credible things to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSMNYCWIKI (talk • contribs) 20:12, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The article mentioned newspapers and magazines but only linked to youtube and shorefire pressleases, not really using the external sources. That may not have been clear to the participants at Articles for deletion/Jackson Harris. If you commit to using one account only and a username name change, I'd restore the old one. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:22, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * This sockpuppet account of blocked user User:Ssmedianyc has been blocked for block evasion. Presumably SS Media in NYC is a press agency or other publicity outfit, since all the edits of these accounts are publicity accounts about obscure performers affiliated with an equally obscure outfit called JK Music Group. I do find a listing or two for something called SS Media Works in Brooklyn. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  20:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Gordon J. Key
Apparent victim of mass PROD in 2010, author of E-Type (video game), Apocalypse (1990 video game), other Fourth Dimension titles, some BBC Micro games and apparently also. - -- Trevj (talk) 09:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * -- Trevj (talk) 11:01, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. You need to add references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 11:02, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll see what I can include by way of refs shortly. -- Trevj (talk) 11:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

As Blood Runs Black
This article was originally deleted because the band was not significant enough. At the time of it's original deletion, the band was not significant. They had released only one album and had disappeared. However, on 03/15/2011 (since the last delete), the band has released their second album. They've changed line ups and they've been touring extensively, including the Summer Slaughter Tour 2011. I believe this band now meets the criteria for a Wikipedia entry. The French wikipedia left them in: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_Blood_Runs_Black The german, portuguese, polish, italian and spanish wikipedias also have an article for this band. I feel like there are much smaller bands on Wikipedia and this band is getting a short stick. This article needs to be re-added. -Kevinh456 (talk) 15:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Since this article was deleted through the AFD process, it is not subject to recreation here. The matter should go to WP:DRV or WP:RFPP; the former is probably more suitable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:44, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

AV News
reasoning -Seeker4264 (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

I am trying to create a page for the AV News, which is a competitor of the Antelope Valley Press. You allow them to have a page but not us. Why?

What is wrong with this content?
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 18:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Bollywood Xplorer
This wiki article has written from neutral point of view. If any cause is present i will try to improve the article. please undelete it and i will try to improve. this article is about a news and imformation website related to indian film industry -Aman Rajveer 18:16, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://bollywoodxplorer.com/about-us/. GB fan 19:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Zephyr : Cultural Fest of Orissa Engineering College
Because it's an event of such an institute which is the first private technical institute of eastern India and is the host to many famous inter college competitions. - Radhamadhab Sarangi   (Talk2Me&#124;Contribs) 19:31, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You can contest the speedy by typing on the talk page. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 19:48, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Now it's deleted - and does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for an encyclopedia article ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 10:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Vera Peiffer
reasoning Vera Peiffer is a notable writter. You deleted it so fast that I did not have the chance to improve it -688dim (talk) 09:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

AV News
It is just as notable as the page for AV News competitor Antelope Valley Press and that page is still here. SO either delete both or allow both. -Seeker4264 (talk) 11:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Already declined above. Please read the links provided to you so that you may better understand policy around here ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:27, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Bollywood Xplorer
This article has only 13 words relevancy. It is not violating the copyright Wiki guideline says that couple of sentences can be quoted and it is safe. How it is violating the copyright?- -CrazyAboutBollywood 20:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * As per the extensive discussion on my talkpage, you already have a way forward ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 21:27, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * And it's more then just the first sentence. the first version of this article. (mopsters only) was an exact word per word copy of http://bollywoodxplorer.com/about-us/ . This article needs to be started from scratch, preferably by someone with no connection to the subject. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Roy Shildt
I am Roy Shildt. My page was taken down to delete my achievement as the Missile Command Champion in the 1986 Edition of the Guinness Bk of WRs My score was verified and in good standing todayMy photo was also published in the 1986 Guinness Book because I was the first computer athlete inducted into the Hall of Fame I was a star of the "King of Kong A Fistful of Quarters and was called the missile command champ 9n the movie because the producers reverified the information. My Wiki page was deleted by some who doesn't like me for malicious intent. -69.234.43.13 (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Roy Shildt, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 21:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Synergy Resources
The Synergy Resources page was on par with the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicor page. Both were references for ERP software creators. If the Epicor page continues to exist, then that is an inconsistent application of the guidelines. Epicor is one example of dozens of company references that are available that were consistent with the Synergy Resources entry and the Epicor entry. If those pages remain, it is because they adhere to the guidelines and the Synergy Resources page followed suit. The "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" link referenced in the explanation of the deletion was not available, so I could not contest the deletion. Suggesting that I would use an unavailable function does not allow me to interact. Making a notification at 1:30AM (GMT -0800), then a deletion soon thereafter gives me no opportunity to respond to the nomination before it is deleted. -Dewolfe001 (talk) 15:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌ The article Synergy Resources made no plausible claim of significance. Epicor may or may not need deleting too, but either way that has no bearing on whether Synergy Resources should be deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Brower,RobertH.jpg
reasoning -With all due respect, Orpherebus. (talk) 12:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Don't know how to put a copyright tag on it With all due respect, Orpherebus. (talk) 12:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It is currently not deleted, so why did you make a request for it? Also, is that picture created by you? Or is it created by someone else? Dipankan  ( Have a chat? ) 15:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Dipankan  ( Have a chat? ) 11:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Global Adolescent Project
This is a valid Non-profit organization with 501(c)(3) status. It is a recognized organization run out of Los Angeles and the article is providing valuable history and information on the organization. The article was deleted due to "(A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content)" but the status of the organization and it's work as described on the article shows the significance. -Reedalvarado (talk) 01:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - although causes are typically very noble, this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning causes. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 09:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Henrik Breimyr
This match makes Breimyr pass WP:NFOOTY -Mentoz86 (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Henrik Breimyr, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 09:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

dear dead valentine
reasoning -Deardeadvalentine (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

This is the official wiki of on of Australia's succeessful bands. They also do close work with charity.
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 09:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have cause-name-blocked the user and recommended Myspace if they want to set up an "official wiki" for their band. A new user,, at once popped up and re-inserted the article; we may need salt. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Larson Financial
no reason to delete, notable company, many awards, local business in Denver, CO -Larsonmedia (talk) 15:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Larson Financial so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should first approach user, the administrator who closed the discussion. Then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can raise them at WP:Deletion review. Please note that Wikipedia is not a business directory and, as you are evidently associated with the company, please first read the guidelines WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. JohnCD (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

List of best-selling boy bands
I think it was a nice information on who's the best selling boyband, also how well boybands do compared to general/"real" bands and among themselves. Besides, List of best-selling girl groups is there so why remove the boyband one? Thank you. -Krystaleen (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, in case s/he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you could contribute. JohnCD (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Krystaleen (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manoj_Bhargava
reasoning -Melanie Grimes 16:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Please restore the image that I submitted for this page. I also sent the documents showing that I had complete ownership of this image Melanie Grimes 16:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melapatella (talk • contribs) 16:48, 30 April 2012‎
 * ❌. That image file was on Wikimedia Commons, a separate organization which stores files such as images for all the Wikimedia projects. Their deletion log for it is here. You need to request undeletion at commons:Commons:Undeletion requests. JohnCD (talk) 17:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Master Johnny Guerrero
this is strictly a biography of a person. it is not promoting a business or anything for that matter. -Thekneeonbelly (talk) 14:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  It's a resume, not an encyclopedia article ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 15:27, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Michael Titus
reasoning -ArtLifestyle (talk) 03:36, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

My name is Daniel and the article that I wrote is about a college professor that I had at Southern Utah University. Professor Titus was my favorite teacher while I attended last semester (Fall 2011) and I was moved to include him in Wiki for his amazing work. I have seen print image after image that this man did during his career as a combat photojournalist that are nothing short of amazing. I feel my article was penalized because of my lack of experience in submitting to Wikipedia. I tried to add references to support my article but am not sure I did it correctly. Some of your comments about my article which is not autobiographical but rather from candid interviews with professor Titus that I conducted while at SUU. Mr. Titus is a well know Artist and Photographer
 * ❌. This article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Michael Titus so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here, and you cannot simply put it in again. If you consider that the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should approach administrator, who has protected the title against creation. Then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review.


 * Your problem is that Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability policy requires that "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source." Your personal knowledge of Mr Titus, and information you gained from interviewing him, are original research and not an acceptable source. Also, your own opinion that his work is "amazing" does not help to meet the WP:Notability requirement for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Finally, the whole tone of your article was promotional - an encyclopedia article should not contain opinions, just plain facts, neutrally stated and backed by reliable published sources. JohnCD (talk) 15:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Jorge Casado
Has featured for Real Madrid's first team in a competitive fixture this season, thereby passing WP:NFOOTBALL. -Bobby (talk) 07:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Fernando Pacheco Flores
Has featured in a competitive fixture for Real Madrid's first team this season, thereby passing WP:NFOOTBALL. -Bobby (talk) 07:54, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ Ditto. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Zoey Zo
Alonzo Mathews better known as his stage name (Zoey Zo) (born April 6, 1991) is an American Performing-Rapper Artist from Berkeley California. He is known for Writing all songs.He has collaborations with Larry Mathews January 18.1993(Super Star) (Diplomats). Terius Nash (The Dream)September 20, 1977 (Radio Killa)along side appearances from (Kid Cudi). Alonzo has a debut album to release. He has also appeared on Bet 106 & Park and MTV top ten. The song he wrote "Brilliant" is approved by the RIAA Recording Industry of Americia -76.105.104.31 (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 18:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Redouchelicant
reasoning -Peacemanager (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

This information is fair use under U.S. copyright law because it is (1) noncommercial, (2) transformative in nature,and (3) does not compete with the original work and could have no negative effect on it's market.And it's well understood and accepted by a majority of the public.
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. This was not deleted for copyright reasons, but because it was an attack page, designed only to disparage its subject. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda. JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Also note that Wikipedia is not a place for something you made up one day; articles here are about notable topics not for new words you want to insert into the language. (The use of "douche" as a pejorative component of your made-up word must also be considered as rather sexist.) -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  16:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

QuoteMeFive.com
page was still under construction -TheOneBusiness (talk) 16:20, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Article was deleted for reason A7 for speedy deletion - not having significance. I had the new {newpage} heading signifying it was still under construction. Thank you for your time and consideration

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  16:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Charlieroselogo.PNG
This logo is text and ineligible for copyrights. There must be previous revisions still surviving. -George Ho (talk) 21:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done, one revision restored. — ξ xplicit  22:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Tunnels Roderick Gordon & Brian Williams.jpg
This is the front cover of the novel Tunnels, temporarily removed from that article by an IP/vandal, and subsequently deleted under F5. -DoctorKubla (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done. — ξ xplicit  22:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Riskay
Requesting userfication for possible restoration. -Chubbles (talk) 06:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Chubbles/Riskay. Minus a low-fi version after the afd. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

A-fu Teng
reasoning -Jin888 (talk) 07:18, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

1. A-fu Teng 2. why would the singers bio on wikipedia be deleted. everything is correct. she is an uprising star in taiwan. the page should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jin888 (talk • contribs)


 * Comment. If I were the deleting admin, I might have been inclined to reconsider as I think there is enough reasonable doubt as to the subject's notability. However, after reading the article creator's comments on Bwilkins's and Sandstein's talk pages, I wasn't to impressed with the chip he seems to have on his shoulder about this. Timmyshin, (I know you're reading this) you worked hard on this article, it was deleted and you're pissed. I would be too. However, the way you talked to these two admins is not the way we talk to each other here and I have to praise Sandstein for restarting the AFD after your more qualified admin cheap shot. At this point I would recommend you work on a userspace draft and then submit it to deletion review. Also, I am curious as to why you didn't !vote in the AFD? Note to Jin888. There may be good reasons to undelete this article but the one you provided isn't one of them. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Derek Frye (All My Children)
Are there any revisions that do not infringe soapcentral.com or pinevalleybulletin? If so, will you redirect this to List of All My Children characters? -George Ho (talk) 12:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done There was just a redirect, restored and pointed as above. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Obama Eats Dogs
This is an important meme in the current political climate. People should be aware of the fact that Obama actually ate dog meat and, as an adult, did express any regret for this. -128.91.72.149 (talk) 18:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. I've eaten dog meat; I might have even inhaled at college. Big deal ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 21:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

bittele
I was trying to put a EMS company's information in wikipedia, but later I found it to be deleted. The reasoning given to me was : "...advertisement". I was not promoting the company and do not have any intention to promote this company. Please let me know this in detail. -Asuraastra (talk) 20:40, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 21:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

PlayStation 4

 * I received this message in my user talk page:
 * I request history undeletions of PlayStation 4 & Playstation 4 (as well as their talk pages). I also request that Playstation 4 is redirected to the same section as PlayStation 4. SNS (talk) 04:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Presumably the grounds for his request is that "there is now more definite information that PlayStation 4 is coming": see PlayStation. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:58, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Presumably the grounds for his request is that "there is now more definite information that PlayStation 4 is coming": see PlayStation. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:58, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Cascade Lakes Brewing Company
Prominent Brewing Company in the Northwest, I originally came to wikipedia to get more information, but saw that a page for it did not exist. Several other pages refer to the page, but there is not even a stub. -Lossy (talk) 18:17, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. If the article is to be kept, it needs references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Windows 1.0 logo.svg
This file is ineligible for copyright protection per. -George Ho (talk) 13:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Dipankan  ( Have a chat? ) 07:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Wait, what about prior revisions? --George Ho (talk) 07:50, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It's the same pic I see in old revisions. Dipankan  ( Have a chat? ) 16:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

David Akin
There is a David Akin who is a political reporter in Ottawa, the Capital of Canada. This article basically accuses him of colluding with the Prime Minister, like "James Guckert / Jeff Gannon" colluded with George W. Bush. That one reference, alone, would not be sufficient to establish notability for David Akin, journalist. An earlier article was deleted as WP:CSD, 6 years ago. I request userification of the earlier article on David Akin, to see if it is about the same individual, as the accusation may be sufficient to push him over the edge to notability. Oh, yeah, the administrator who deleted the article has been on wikibreak for six months. Geo Swan (talk) 08:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 08:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * mirror
 * ✅ to User:Geo Swan/David Akin. Looks like the same guy. Five years ago that was an NN autobio, but maybe he is notable now. JohnCD (talk) 09:00, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 09:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Toshio Yamaguchi/First case of Fermat's last theorem
Page was deleted under WP:CSD U1. I want to work on the draft again. --- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 11:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Not much there, though. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. I need to expand it. :) Thanks for restoring it. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 13:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Double sharp/Alkaline earth metal
This was speedily deleted by G7, but I want to start working on it again. The current article (Alkaline earth metal) is really in bad shape. Double sharp (talk) 14:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC) -Double sharp (talk) 14:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --Tikiwont (talk) 18:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Hallmark logo.svg
This image has prior revisions because the image itself is out of copyright by either lack of copyright notice or lack of copyright renewal registration. I wonder if restoring prior versions is worth a time. -George Ho (talk) 19:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done not worthwhile, the older image is smaller than the current one, but looks to be same resolution. Same uploader. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Nardo FK
I want to create an article about this club, and realized that an previous article had been speedy deleted. I want this article userfied, to see if it is anything worth keeping in that article -Mentoz86 (talk) 21:52, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at user:Mentoz86/Nardo FK. but it was not really worth doing! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

MegaSearches
California State University Sundial Newspaper -Takapoisa2002 (talk) 09:22, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It exists. However, it's not necessarily notable.  For example, Dogpile is also a metasearch engine - but has distinct claims of notability.  The article, as written, was also deletable as highly promotional - the language and phrasing were like an advertisement. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Armbrust/Snooker player points
Deleted under U1, now I want it back. -Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 01:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done. — ξ xplicit  05:19, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 05:38, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

damon dash
reasoning -108.95.128.189 (talk) 01:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC) ❌, The article is currently under the scrutiny of the Wikimedia Foundation Office and is protected for legal reasons. Dipankan ( Have a chat? ) 06:53, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Nikhil Singh Kirola
this article means alot for me as this is my first articles so i would sinceraly request to the authorities to renew the article so that i can make further changes in the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikhilnapster (talk • contribs) 04:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  Dipankan  ( Have a chat? ) 06:55, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

John Serry, Jr.
notability: A simple Google search on John Serry will confirm that I am an internationally known recording artist, pianist and composer. The search results should not be confused with my father, John Serry Sr. who was a an accordionist that worked as a local sideman for many years in the New York / Long Island area. Nearly all search results that one can find are about me and my work. (I dropped the Jr. decades ago.) My brother has written, shall we say, a very impressive representation of my father at Wikipedia. Ironically, although I am internationally known with recordings on major labels, a Grammy Nomination, and an active international career as a jazz pianist and jazz and modern classical composer, the Wikipedia article about me (written by others and slightly corrected by me after the fact) was deleted around the time that the one on my father was made. Note that of the few search results that come up about my father virtually all of them are the Wikipedia article itself or derivations of that article. In case there is any confusion, if an internet item does not have Sr. appended to the name, then it is about me, not about me father. (I have not yet found an exception to that, although one or two might exist.) In any case a careful reading of any item concerning John Serry will show that it is about me, the jazz pianist, jazz and classical composer and sometimes percussionist, rather than my father the accordionist who also played organ in a wedding chapel and wrote some (primarily accordion) music and method books. ADDENDUM: Among numerous sites in which you will find reference to me (as pianist, composer and occasionally percussionist), there are recording artist and jazz websites e.g., allmusic.com, allaboutjazz.com), websites about modern classical pieces that feature percussion (e.g.,mostlymarimba.com which publishes several of my compositions; professional and student concert and recital programs that include my works, performers discussing my works), announcements of performances of my jazz groups or of my solo piano concerts (primarily in Europe where I have been for the past 8 years), cd and lp vendors (amazon.com, cduniverse, vinyl resellers that offer my early albums), well known jazz musicians (e.g., Peter Erskine, John Riley, Bob Sheppard) in whose resume or biography I am included, major magazine websites where I have been favorably reviewed (e.g. JazzTimes), my website johnserry.com (currently under reconstruction to prepare for my new album release), professional networking sites (myspace, linkedin), numerous videos uploaded by fans and colleagues (my jazz recordings/performances and my classical works, e.g., at youtube), sites about films/videos for which I have composed the soundtracks, etc. (One of the unfortunate consequences of the deletion is that at a couple of websites that I have seen, my recordings or videos have the John Serry Sr. bio attached to them. Some sites automatically use a Wikipedia biography and think that the John Serry Sr. biography is me. This is very frustrating as my father has virtually no recordings or videos and some of mine are found with his Wikipedia biography attached.) Anyway, all of these things can be viewed online. -Jserry (talk) 13:05, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * A few issues here. First, the article John Serry Jr was deleted in November 2009.  Second, this in part because it was a biography of a living person that had no references - a huge no-no.  Someone (not you or anyone related to you) might have a good opportunity to create a draft article, or use articles for creation to develop an entry that is acceptable for inclusion.  Note: this means it proves notability (especially under WP:MUSIC, has valid third party sources, etc. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 17:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Ron Brown (Nebraska)
{{subst:refund|1= Ron Brown (Nebraska)There is not enough reason to delete it, the article is NOT controversial, but rather deleting it is. I think the true reason for the deletion is that there are those who disagree with and despise Ron Brown's beliefs and what he stands for, remember it is his first ammendment right to speak against gays,abortion, and the unfair ethics behind our so called "Human Rights". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.242.63.182 (talk) 15:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Ron Brown (Nebraska), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user {{user1|Ron Ritzman}}. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The article was not deleted because Brown is a bigot (as you say, he still has the right to speak; and we have articles on lots of bigots); it was deleted because he's an assistant coach, and the consensus was that like any other assistant coach, he is not notable. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  16:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

futuresoft
This is a major corporation and company. They have had significant history in the development of Terminal Emulation and Bible Applications. They have existed for over 30years. I believe the article should have never been removed. -Quantum85leap (talk) 16:05, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/FutureSoft, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  16:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Tarana Wireless
This is not advertisement and was written from a neutral point of view with references that can be verified. Please explain or undelete as I've seen many similar pages to the page I created. -Danfoxy (talk) 17:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  Anytime you think you need to add "™" to an article, it's usually past the point of being an encyclopedia article, and has gone into promotional.  Please also note, the existence of one article does not mean another should ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 17:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

itsachat
reasoning -Auxiv (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Why do you allow Wireclub a wikipedia page, but our chat site can't have one? We have been on the web for 5 years!! JUST as long as wireclub!! We were working on our itsachat page!
 * WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, conflict of interest, promotions, lack of notability to name just a few ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 17:32, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * PS: It had not been deleted yet - but it has now. See WP:FIRSTARTICLE ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 17:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Forward
So...why would Wikipedia delete the associations of the slogan "Forward" to socialist european countries associated with Mao, Lenin, Stahlin and Hitler? You can't delete history, no matter how hard your elitist historical revisionist members of the media want to. We are here, we are watching, and we have already archived the Wikipedia notation before you changed it today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.121.104.221 (talk) 19:01, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * . Create a request that is based on some form of policy, and it may be considered. Soapboxing is not a ground for restoration. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:04, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I will also point out, since the "sources" you are relying won't, that "Forward!" is the state motto of Scott Walker's own Wisconsin. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  20:09, 10 May 2012 (UTC) (proud of Wisconsin)

SDL Tridion
Deletion was apparently for advertising, however there ought to be a page about such a significant organisation. I'd like to see the content that was previously there with a view to editing out any advertising material. -Dominic Cronin (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:DominicCronin/SDL Tridion. You may work on improving the article's content at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

File talk:AsimovOnThrone.png
The file deletion log says it all: this page should be preserved because it is linked from File:Isaac Asimov on Throne.png on commons. -Yoenit (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --Tikiwont (talk) 09:46, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Train a puppy to stop biting
Article deleted in the middle of an unclosed deletion discussion (Articles for deletion/Train a Puppy to Stop Biting), and is not a valid early closure. Undelete it, then it may be deleted again if the discussion says to do so. - jfd34  ( talk ) 13:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done While the deleting admin cited neither, both CSD#A10 and WP:SNOW seem applicable. Lady  of  Shalott  15:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Redwood Technologies
I am an employee of Redwood Technologies Ltd. and it seems our wikipedia page, which was sanctioned by the company, has been deleted without trace. We're both keen to understand why this was, and to have it restored as soon as possible. Thank you for your time. -213.249.207.82 (talk) 15:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done It has been deleted per the outcome of Articles for deletion/Redwood Technologies (2nd nomination) by, who you may want to contact for further info as it cannot be uncontroversially restored here (see top of page). But please have first a look at the discussion, as well as at our guidelines on notability and Conflict of interest.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Floridays Resort Orlando
Valid information, written in an editorial fashion, similar to other hotel articles found on Wikipedia. I'm open to "userfying" direction of the article, if that helps. Thanks in advance for any help which can be offered to me. -Brian Walton (talk) 18:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done Userfying isn't an option as you actually still have the draft at User:Brian Walton/sandbox And if regardless of any other stuff around you can't see that this isn't remotely resembling an encyclopedic article you're probably too close to the subject.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:22, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Images by Kaalos of ar

 * File:Bathtimefordoggirl.JPG
 * File:Daisy the dog girl getting ready for Halloween.jpg
 * File:Closeupofdaisythedogslave.JPG
 * File:Daisy sleeping.JPG
 * File:Daisy always there.JPG
 * File:Lock and bolt system that makes daisys face permanent.jpg
 * File:Locked up in a coset.jpg
 * File:Eye of a trapped pup.JPG
 * File:Choice2.jpg
 * File:Getting bolted in.jpg
 * File:Trying to escape 0.JPG
 * File:Trying to escape 1.JPG
 * File:Trying to escape 2.JPG
 * File:Failure to escape.jpg
 * File:Putting away the tempoary face.JPG
 * File:Image-Kaalos g locked-in a.jpg

These files were deleted as "Orphaned, no encyc use for this series of images". While I cannot see the deleted files, other images by the same author are relevant to petplay, and have been called "very useful and unusual images". I think they should be restored (and moved to Commons) until a consensus for their deletion is established.

Cheers! Handcuffed (talk) 00:55, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Since the Commons affects a lot of projects, I would suggest to get a consensus here before any kind of move is done. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 04:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, but nobody seems to comment here, and besides, the Commons community is different. Isn't it easier to move them to Commons and see what happens in a possible deletion request? As I see it, the burden of proof should be higher for deletion than for keeping, and no consensus was established for the deletion in the first place. Handcuffed (talk) 22:50, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Yuri Rutman
Please restore the page Yuri Rutman. This is not autobiographical and in line with thousands of other media executives and film/tv producers. A similar issue on this was resolved more than two years ago. Further, there are numerous public profiles, major news articles & stories (MSNBC, FOX NEWS, etc) that correlate to all the information provided -Euromogul (talk) 20:02, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * As per your forum-shopping at ANI, WP:DRV is thataway...( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 10:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Noci Pictures Entertainment
Prominent private equity media firm that has been written about in worldwide third party media and press. Nothing self promotional about it. Shows statement of facts that can be verified from independent third party news media and links. -Euromogul (talk) 20:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Euromogul (talk) 20:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:18, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

number1hater
reasoning -Meganmeade (talk) 00:29, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

I can provide the links www.Number1hater.com  www.myspace.com/number1hater  several important magazine press from blender magazine, stuff , beat magazine and  movie soundtracks as well as a popular book called myspace a place for friends seems like it qualifies for a wiki page. blender magazine is the best selling music magazine besides rolling stongs and they labeled Number1hater the biggest unsigned act on myspace and the most popular
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

End of American Soap Opera Era
I wonder if deleting it is a mistake. Previously, it has sources, but are they reliable enough to suffice notability of this topic? If so, it must be undeleted and then renamed to decline of soap operas in the United States. Otherwise, does this topic meet standards of notability in any way?] -George Ho (talk) 10:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: it looks WP:SYNTHy to me ("Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources") - are there sources actually about the decline rather than illustrating aspects of it? As this was a PROD deletion, you can have it back just by asking, if you think something can be made of it - up to you. JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If full of original research, then no need to undelete it. However, if there is at least one sentence that explicitly explains the decline of soap operas in the United States, then which ones? --George Ho (talk) 10:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)