Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 69

File:JackOfAllTrades Complete.jpg
not my image, needed for article, I'll fix licensing -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --Tikiwont (talk) 19:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 21:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Ghost (Phish song)
deleted as being "non-notable song" which is absurd as it is one of the band's most significant songs, both as a concert showpiece and as the title track (sort of) of an album -65.207.69.2 (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:29, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Template talk:Expand
Undeleting this talk page is necessary for people who wonder why this template must not be used. The current version is nominated for deletion, but "keep" votes are coming in and "delete" votes are absent. -George Ho (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done --Tikiwont (talk) 19:27, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you serious, or is this the wrong template you substituted? --George Ho (talk) 19:29, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Done i meant but I couldn't see the outcome because of an wikimedia error. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Gray Plant Mooty
The Gray Plant Mooty page was deleted by an editor on the grounds that the law firm did not exist, when in fact it does exist. Please visit www.gpmlaw.com for confirmation. I have contacted the editor that deleted the page and he did not restore it because he's no longer active on Wikipedia. -207.67.87.22 (talk) 21:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * This was deleted 4 years ago, and contrary to your claim, it was NOT deleted because it didn't exist; it was deleted as it does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, especially under WP:CORP. Wikipedia is not a listing of businesses or firms; it is an encyclopedia ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 22:37, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Tales From The Aniverse
Originally prodded this for sources and it was deleted. However, I found a couple. - Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:43, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. — ξ xplicit  00:59, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

We As Human
"I would like to open an undeletion discussion about an article I created about the band We As Human. File:We As Human.jpeg I can prove that they meet the WP:MUSIC, WP:GNG & WP:BAND criteria. They are a very notable rock band signed to a MAJOR music label (Atlantic Records) and have been on national television for years, i.e., xbox commercials, music channels, television interviews on frequent rotation, etc. They recently finished the winterjam Tour that afterwards took the #1 position on the tour charts - which meet the WP:GOODCHARTS criteria - for the first quarter! http://instagr.am/p/JQWDcpCnmU/

I'm not sure why this article was actually deleted. The researched cited in the deletion discussion was poor and unfounded at best. I feel it is mostly discriminatory since We As Human is known as a christian band. This was, I believe, a simple case of poor wikipedian academics and anti-religious bigotry"


 * (Copied from http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AUndeletion_requests%2FCurrent_requests&diff=70877151&oldid=70874402 -User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 04:14, 9 May 2012 (UTC))
 * (It was posted there by user . JohnCD (talk) 09:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC))
 * ❌. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/We As Human so, as stated at the head of this page, it will not be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should approach user, the administrator who closed the discussion. Then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review.


 * Please read WP:No personal attacks and comment on content rather than making assumptions about the motives of other contributors. Accusations of bigotry will not help your case. JohnCD (talk) 09:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the great advice on proper Wikipedian conduct. I didn't mean any harm by my comments and I will procede in a professional manner. --Jamnashville (talk) 06:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Digital workplace
this page explains what the phrase digital workplace means. It is a growing subject. I started the page last year and it has been edited and improved by other contributors since then. I can't understand why you propose to delete this page. If you can contact me by email at {redacted) with more details and anything that can be done I will try to do so. I was only informed by someone this morning because they knew I created the page.  Thanks, Mark Morrell -86.173.152.167 (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done I've restored that page under a redirect to virtual workplace where you can consult it and maybe work on it. Not that the target is without problems, but the previous article here seems indeed full of original research and style problems and would need a fundamental rewrite. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Yahoo Falls.JPG
Was speedily deleted for "recreation of deleted material", which simply isn't the case. A previous image with the same file name was deleted two years ago, which I think lead to confusion when I uploaded a new image -Masebrock (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC) Masebrock (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Sorry for the inconvenience. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Film_Riot
Useful article! -184.7.171.165 (talk) 22:30, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Does not appear to meet notability guidelines. Is only useful if Wikipedia was a how to guide ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 00:13, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Boruch Szlezinger
Just do a Google search to see its notoriety (his twitter account in particular). -Juzeor (talk) 01:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Boruch Szlezinger, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — ξ xplicit  01:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

File:FrancisMarionSwampFox.jpg
Botched move, there is no source information in file description on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FrancisMarionSwampFox.jpg (file on commons will be deleted in 7 days) -Bulwersator (talk) 06:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Nevertheless I'm not seeing a source information here as well. Maybe you can contact User:Chris 73 and fix it. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * User notified Bulwersator (talk) 11:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Toshio Yamaguchi/Tesion building
CSD U1ed userspace draft which I want to work on again. --- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 10:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done --Tikiwont (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Kip Knoll Kip Noll.jpg
According to Falcon Studios's terms and conditions, any content must not be used for public display. However, I requested and then have received permission from the Falcon Studios via www.buddy-support.com to use this image for the Kip Noll article. Therefore, this must be tagged as non-free with permission if WP:NFCC is passed. -George Ho (talk) 00:18, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done Given their restrictions, please follow the instructions at WP:OTRS and have the appropriate party contact the foundation regarding the copyright issues. Once a ticket is provided through OTRS, an admin with OTRS access will be able to undelete the image with the appropriate licensing.  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 02:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Delta II/III Launch Vehicle Family
If I remember correctly, this article was prodded about six years ago, when I was somewhat inexperienced, because it duplicated the scope of other articles. I can't remember whether I prodded it myself, or simply agreed with someone else's prod which should have been contested, but in hindsight, as a more experienced editor, I realise that the correct course of action would have been to merge it into Delta (rocket family) instead, leaving the article as a redirect so that it's history would be available. I am therefore requesting that it be undeleted so that this merger may be performed. - W.  D.   Graham  11:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 14:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Know Models Were Harmed
it was listed on the interent movie data base, movie is getting released. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2144180/ -76.91.25.250 (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - just because a film exists (or will exist) does not make it notable ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 17:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

paldo GNU/Linux
Article about Unix-like computer operating system, developed independently of established linux operating systems, with a unique xml-based packaging manager. The article subject is notable but, as with many software subjects, has a limited pool of published sources from which to draw references. Nevertheless, the article should be undeleted. -Oogbus (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please add some of those sources you have in mind. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Sarah Michelle Geller as Kendall Hart.jpg
I have replaced this screenshot with File:Sarah Michelle Gellar Kendall Hart ABC promo.jpg. However, I wonder if the photo that I uploaded is for commercial and editorial uses, as well, as the Steve Urkel image from Getty Images is not allowed. Which one is more substantial: the screenshot or the promo image? -George Ho (talk) 03:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done with timer reset so you have some time to figure it out. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Austin_%28songwriter%29
 This article was deleted because the administrators overlooked 3rd party reliable sources that were better actually than the administrator's research seemed to show.

Additional online references will be cited to support the notability of songwriter John Austin.

The information contained in the article "John Austin (songwriter)" is factual. John Austin meets the notability requirements, having worked with many artists of notability, having received favorable reviews by international magazines (such as Paste Magazine), and having released publicly documented works for over 20 years. Paste Magazine has written feature articles on John Austin, and JA's album "Busted at the Pearly Gates" received an honorable mention in Paste Magazine as one of the most important albums of 2002. Please contact Paste Magazine's editor-in-chief Josh Jackson to verify.

Please undelete the article "John Austin (songwriter)".

Thank you.

98.117.242.142 (talk) 19:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/John Austin (songwriter), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. It would help to provide some links to the sources you have in mind when contacting The Earwig. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Let's not forget that they were advised of the same thing at WP:ANI ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 20:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

The problem is that the article should not have been deleted in the first place. The reason given for deleting the article was the name "John Austin" was too common. There are 20 years of references to the work of John Austin from album credits to credible national magazine reviews -- which can be cited legally. The research seems to have overlooked a few sources, including an editorial from Paste Magazine's editor-in-chief, Josh Jackson:

http://www.pastemagazine.com/high_gravity/2008/08/paste-favorites-with-new-records.html

Paste Magazine issue #2 has a feature article on John Austin, and also includes one of his songs on that issue's CD sampler.

www.pastemagazine.com/images/samplersleeves/Issue2.pdf

Another Paste article features an interview with John Austin on his thoughts about late songwriter Mark Heard:

http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2003/07/mark-heard.html

The article "John Austin (songwriter)" has been in existence for many years. While some of the past links may have broken over time, there are numerous sources that can be found with a little more research.

This article was deleted because the administrators overlooked 3rd party reliable sources that were better actually than the administrator's research seemed to show.

Would someone please help us work through the undeletion process?

98.117.242.142 (talk) 23:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Take it to deletion review - it will not be handled from this page. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Civil War of Maywood
Does provide information to students at our school, and only students from my school will search it. -Jason S. Smith (talk) 03:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done and will not be done Deleted as a hoax - and will remain that way. There is no place on Wikipedia for this.  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Nuba Wrestling
reasoning -Nijel 05:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) ❌, page has simply been redirected to Nuba fighting. Click on Nuba Wrestling, and it goes to Nuba fighting. As simple as that. :-) Dipankan  ( Have a chat? ) 05:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Thermomix
From looking at the last version before deletion, the article had a few phrases that could be misconstrued as promotional, but certainly wasn't a giant ad. The product is popular and unique enough in its field. I can undelete it myself, but thought I would see what the consensus was. -Chuq (talk) 02:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Whilst this board isn't really for determining consensus I agree that it seems salvageable. Nevertheless I've converted it into redirect till you or anybody else has a moment to give it a once over. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

otzarstock
I think I can provide evidence of notability, and some 3d party sources -69.164.142.194 (talk) 02:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you could contribute. JohnCD (talk) 13:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Philker
the article was based in media, blogs , news websites. if you believe that philker is not an important article to be posted here in wikipedia then I'll show you these proof. http://ph.news.yahoo.com/ovp-website-3rd-victim-pinoy-hacker-group-philker-013207199.html http://www.quotednews.com/2011/06/20/official-website-of-vice-president-binay-attacked-by-hackers/ http://www.abante.com.ph/issue/jun2111/news10.htm http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/223568/scitech/pinoy-hacker-group-strikes-fda-website http://www.techalang.com/2011/06/philker-hackers-strikes-again-at-office-of-the-vice-president-website/ http://www.tribuneonline.org/nation/20110621nat1.html http://www.zambotimes.com/archives/32688-VPs-website-falls-to-Pinoy-hacker-group-Philker.html http://www.mb.com.ph/node/323519/ovp-web http://www.spot.ph/newsfeatures/50130/vice-president-jejomar-binays-website-hacked-on-new-years-day http://www.techalang.com/2011/06/pnri-website-hacked-hackers-warns-against-poor-security/ http://www.philippinenewsdaily.com/2011/06/8239/philker-hacked-defaced-ovps-website.html

I'm hoping that the page will be retrieve soon. thanks -Tr3nomiax (talk) 12:59, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Tr3nomiax/Philker. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted.--Tikiwont (talk) 18:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Zoey Zo
reasoning -76.105.104.31 (talk) 17:59, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No such article exists. You asked that one be created, but since it had no substantial content to establish notability, it was declined. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * ..and [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 18:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Nips school of hotel management
reasoning -Ashifshah (talk) 19:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

this article is for a 19 year old institute which has created an unique record, having alumni all across the globe needs a neutral review.
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject..  It may be possible for you to write a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, but it sure cannot be promotional like this one was ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 20:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Infocom Cornerstone box art.jpg
Non-free image, hard to replace. Deleted for no fair use rational, which can be added. If there are two versions, and the reduced-size version is under 300px (maximum thumbnail size) please restore the larger version so I can modify to 300px. -▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  05:17, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done. — ξ xplicit  05:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  05:32, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Mageia
http://distrowatch.com/index.php?dataspan=1 Page Hit Ranking :-) Work in full swing, the distribution develops, works excellent (Mageia 2 RC), it uses a lot of people. But despite this page in English-language Wikipedia removed. It's no secret that Mageia - a direct descendant of Linux Mandrake, in contrast to the modern Mandriva. Simply situation similar to OpenOffice.org / LibreOffice :-)

P.S. I used Google Translate, do not know much English. -46.185.61.78 (talk) 08:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Mageia, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:19, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Ron Craddock
reasoning -Ron Craddock (talk) 09:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

(Info. seems to be incomplete.) Ron Craddock, b. London, 1933. TV producer/director at BBC mainly during 1970s, 1980s. Produced the largest number of episodes of 'Z Cars' of any producer, nearly 300. Was the initiating producer of 'Angels', commissioneing the first writers and directors, and engageing first casts ... alongside producing the first 44 (50') episodes. Also produced ‘A Legacy’, a novel written by Sybille Bedford (‘a masterpiece of English prose’ per wiki. ref. and 'an orphan');  ‘Charters & Caldicott’ by (X ref.) Keith Waterhouse;  based on the characters of Hitchcock’s ‘The Lady Vanishes’; ‘The Consultant’, dramatised by (X ref.) Alan Plater from novel by John McNeil;  'Penmarric' the novel by Susan Howatch (X ref.):  ‘Nightmare Man’, (became a a cult horror video) Douglas Camfield, director, (X ref). also several other multi episode serials. Also directed ‘Vendetta’, The First Lady’, Troubleshooters‘, ’Dr. Finlay’s Casebook’, ’Z Cars’, ’Angels’, ’East Enders’, ’District Nurse’, ’Rockliffe’s Folly’. Ext. ref. IMBd.com
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  Additionally, please check WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI.  Also, imdb is not a valid reference, especially for biographies of living people. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:02, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

shazzie
You recently deleted the page Shazzie which I believe to be in error. Your comments were that "it was self promotional and that you can't call yourself a TV presenter if all you've done is record an 8 min clip for an obscure…" This information is incorrect. Shazzie is a writer, TV presenter and recording artist. She has contracts with publishers both in the UK as well as the USA. Her TV show is in the final editing stages and is due to be aired soon throughout Europe. If you take issue with the TV show not being live yet, then of course remove that and it can be added again once aired, and even query anything that you find "self promotional". Shazzie is a recognised published author and I am requesting that you please undelete the page. I look forward to your reply. Thanks for your time. -Scribble64 (talk) 16:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject..  Right now, the sole basis for possible inclusion may be the show - but WP:CRYSTAL cannot say whether it might create such notability ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 16:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Sabrina Fabian
famous person, intesting article -Sabryanto (talk) 17:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 18:01, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Mageia
https://forums.mageia.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2428&p=18065&hilit=wikipedia#p18065 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.185.61.78 (talk) 21:09, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Mageia, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Dipankan  ( Have a chat? ) 04:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Fateh Ullah Khan Kundi
The person is enjoying high fame these days because of his bold stance on the ongoing Baloch conflict in his oped pieces. He is a regular contributor to many major newspapers of the Pakistan on the worsening situation of Balochistan. he is regarded as an expert on the Baloch issues and geography.So i am requesting the undeletion of this article as if wikipedia is not for such people then go with your policy of filling it with the biographies of dirty politicians -Mr Kundi (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done This has now been deleted six times and at a certain point it needs to be clear that it would need articles about him as apposed to articles by him and that attacks aren't helping either. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * In other words - Read WP:Notability (people). — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 03:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

File:SaharaCasinoLogo.svg
Restore revision 20071117190141!SaharaCasinoLogo.svg. This version is the full version of the logo, the subsequent upload was to satisfy a policy of WP:LOGO that no longer exists. -Svgalbertian (talk) 14:24, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem with the restoration, but want another admin to look at the old image - the first time I tried looking at it the last line of text came out all red... don't want to restore a corrupt image, but, it might just be my craptastically slow connection & a rendering problem. Skier Dude  ( talk ) 01:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done As far as I see the previous one has an extra line of white text, but strangely I now can't see any log of it being restored. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:59, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

N8VEM
N8VEM home brew computing project is a volunteer community, not a business. "advertising" is an invalid basis for removal since it is a non-commercial group -Lynchaj (talk) 16:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Please reinstate the N8VEM page. The N8VEM page is a valuable reference for Homebrew Computer enthusiasts worldwide. It is a Non profit Project founded by Andrew Lynch who generously offers his time and knowledge to those interested in learning how to build a home brew computer. I have personally benefited from the N8VEM group in knowledge and skills needed to build my own Homebrew computer. N8VEM deserves a reference in the Wikepededia because it exists and has existed for many years now as a purely educational resource that can only benefit Computer Enthusiasts. Your Sincerely, Nik B. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brizza62 (talk • contribs)


 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The article has been submitted to WP:AFD ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 23:49, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Nicolas Kent
I have no idea why this article was deleted. Nicolas Kent was Artistic Director of the Tricycle Theatre in London between 1984- 2012 and appears in WHO's WHO. He was profiled in the Saturday interview in The Guardian in February this year, and the Daily Telegraph and the Times in November last year. He was made the first ever Freeman of Brent in May of this year. The article about him was accurate, and he is mentioned in many other Wikipedia entries. He won the TMA Special Achievement Award, and the Peter Brook Empty Stage Special Award 2011 as as the Liberty Human Rights Arts Award 2011. -90.0.51.19 (talk) 21:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The article was deleted because it was created 5 July 2011 and between then and when it was deleted 12 April 2012 it never had any sources in it. Our policies require articles about living people to be sourced.  GB fan 22:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Factseducado
As a user talk page it is not eligible for U1, It appears that the editor may (or may not) be thinking about a WP:RTV request and since the editor is still editing this needs to be restored and the correct procedure followed. I have asked the deleting admin Anthony Bradbury but it looks like they may be away at this time. - Mt king  (edits)  02:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * by Elen of the Roads ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 15:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Burned in Blizzard
Did not have enough time to add information why this band is important. In the middle of edit my article was deleted, I did not save all the written info with all codes and symbols and basic band info. If by speedy deletion they mean delete while you edit, then they did just that! -Karurisu (talk) 14:31, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The "article" certainly did not meet any of the required criteria to remain on Wikipedia, see especially WP:MUSIC. You're welcome to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, and then ask for assistance in verifying if it's ready for articlespace ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 15:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Remaining BBC logos
According to WP:deletion review/Log/2012 January 30, BBC logos are possibly non-free in the UK. --George Ho (talk) 03:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done All the images exist. The second one, BBC Japan, can be found here. The .png version was deleted because of poor quality. Dipankan  ( Have a chat? ) 09:45, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * File:BBC.svg concurrently exists in both English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. --George Ho (talk) 19:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Now two more file concurrently exists in both English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Multiply (website)
It has just come to my attention that the Multiply (website) page was deleted. I found a discussion from 2006 discussing deletion with a resolution of disambiguating that Multiply.com is different than multiply (as in multiplication), but I couldn't find any reason given there as to why it was deleted in 2010 or 2011 (I'm not sure when it was actually removed). The website/company is still going strong and is one of the few (if not only, though some of the shop sites are slowly becoming more social) social networking sites that enables people to sell products (their own or others) through a fully functional social networking system. The company is also moving its offices to Southeast Asia which I think shows an interesting shift in how social media is being used in various places around the globe. I don't work for Multiply. I've just been using the site since 2004 and was surprised to see that though it was the first to have a feed (like Facebook's feed, only Multiply had it years before them) and though it was the first to include audio and video replies (among several other firsts) it's not even got a mention on the social networking list page any more. What gives? -Barefootmeg (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * As you can see when you try to view the article, it was deleted because it was written as an advertisement. That doesn't mean it was not-notable, but when it reads like advertising copy, there's no possible way for it to remain ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 15:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy undelete and trout slap (if not whale slap) UtherSRG for deleting this. It existed for 6 years before deletion,had survived AFD, there were old version of the article that didn't suffer from the advertisement-speak, the article wasn't "exclusively promotional" (as WP:CSD requries), and even if all of these hadn't been true, it could have been stubified. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * How do I view the article? Is there a way to see something that's been deleted? The person who first wrote the article was a Multiply employee, so he was understandably biased. But I thought I had modified what he had done enough to give information without it being advertising. There's all sorts of firsts that Multiply achieved that I never had the chance to add, simply not having the time. What is the next step to bringing it back? -Barefootmeg (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:54, 22 May 2012 (UTC).
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] Done Restored latest reasonably stable version from 2010, after which mostly spam by single purpose accounts or updated alexa rankings. Will need work and vigilance, though. Best --Tikiwont (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, Tikiwont! I'll try to get it updated soon. Barefootmeg (talk) 22:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)barefootmeg

Astral Projection (band)
Someone on IRC helped me restore the page Astral Projection (band) (or perhaps Astral Projection (group)) to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Oskar_Liljeblad/Astral_Projection_(band). I have since then made one reference, added a sentence, and added another reference. I could manually update the page but the person who helped me said it would be good if the history could be restored as well, and that would require an administrator. -Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 19:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything there that even hints at notability, especially as per WP:MUSIC ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 19:47, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It's hard to find references on the net. I've added the ones I found. They are one of the biggest trance/goa acts. They're noted on Wikipedia in many other languages, but even on those pages references are mainly missing. I don't know what else to do... Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 05:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Some semi-reliable source ([]) claim their album reached #2 on Israel album chars in 1995... Unfortunately there is a huge lack of reliable sources on the subject. Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 16:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I have added more sources now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oskar Liljeblad (talk • contribs) 17:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * History under Astral Projection (group) restored. As it actually has bee prodded under that title, remaning notability concerns should  setteld at AfD--Tikiwont (talk) 20:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Jozef De Ley
reasoning -83.111.172.50 (talk) 03:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

This article was about by grandfather and I would like to retrieve this. Thank you
 * It's not appropriate as an article - and was deleted almost 2-1/2 years ago. Is there parts of it that you need e-mailed to you? ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 20:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Nick Hellfort
I am representng Nick Hellfort and created this page on his behalf and on his request -Hkindt (talk) 11:19, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject..  You'll also want to read WP:COI and WP:PROMO ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:31, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

I have new references from other sources that can show the content of the data of the page...THANKS
reasoning -93.146.14.255 (talk) 06:54, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done There is nothing to refund as the deleted article has alrady been restored to User:Giuseppe Martucciello and that would be the only purpose of this board here. Whilst Wikipedia needs subject matter experts, conflict of interest is also to consider. As the person might be notable enough, you may want to check Articles for creation --Tikiwont (talk) 19:44, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Giuseppe Martucciello

Pediatric Surgeon - Inventor - Discoverer. Investigator who published in 1992 the first genetic alteration - 46, XX, del 10 (q11.21 q21.2) karyotype, and the RET proto-oncogene as major gene  of Hirschsprung's disease or congenital megacolon. This development of this publication was the discovery of the first major causative gene of Hirschsprung's Disease on "NATURE", 1994. Giuseppe Martucciello was also inventor of diagnostic tools for histochemical diagnosis of megacolon.

References /


 * Martucciello G, Bicocchi MP, Dodero P, Lerone M, Silengo Cirillo M, Puliti A, Gimelli G, Romeo G.Total colonic aganglionosis associated with interstitial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 10. ( 1992 July), Pediatric Surgery International. Vol 7, 4, 308-310, DOI: 10.1007/BF00183991
 * Teitelbaund DH, Coran AG. (2006)."Hirschsprung's disease and Related Neuromuscular Disorders of the Intestine".Chapter 99; ed. Grosfeld JL, O'Neill JA, Fonkalsrud EW, and Coran AG." Pediatric Surgery" Sixth Edition; Mosby Editions, pp 1519
 * Romeo G,Ronchetto P, Luo Y,Barone V, Seri M, Ceccherini I, Pasini B, Bocciardi R, Lerone M, Kääriäinen H & Martucciello G.(Jan 1994) Point mutations affecting the tyrosine kinase domain of the RET proto-oncogene in Hirschsprung's disease. Nature367,377-378(27);doi:10.1038/367377a0
 * Romeo G, Ceccherini I, Celli J, Priolo M, Betsos N, Bonardi G, Seri M, Yin L, Lerone M, Martucciello G.(1998 Jun). "Association of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and Hirschsprung disease". J Intern Med.243(6):515-20..
 * Martucciello G. (2008 Jun) "Hirschsprung's disease, one of the most difficult diagnoses in pediatric surgery: a review of the problems from clinical practice to the bench". Eur J Pediatr Surg. ;18(3):140-9. Review..

External links


 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

List of Mobile Fighter G Gundam episodes
This page was deleted about a year ago, as far as I know (which admittedly is fairly little in terms of why this article was deleted) the article was simply an episode guide for the anime Mobile Fighter G Gundam. The logs show that it was deleted March 6, after an expiration of Proposed deletion. I have looked around to see if there was any discussion about it (just to be absolutely sure). The Log entry for the article's deletion is as follows:

00:26, 6 March 2011 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted page List of Mobile Fighter G Gundam episodes (Expired PROD, concern was: Unclear, unsourced. What is the subject?)

I'd very much appreciate if this article could be restored, or in the case that there is not enough content to avoid deletion in the future, I will be more than happy to add more to the article. -GokuSS400 (talk) 02:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It was a list ... of one. It was unsourced.  Not sure what else is going to help ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:05, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Mageia
Article page recreated on 20 May 2012‎ at Mageia. - -- Trevj (talk) 08:20, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * As you stated, the article was re-created. As such, the contents of the talkpage when it was deleted has little relevance to the current re-creation.  ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:02, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I conflicted with you Bwilkins and restored it. There wasn't much on the talk page in this case, but my thinking was that in general it is useful to restore the talk page so that previous discussions about the article can be reviewed by other editors. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, so will it be deleted again? Is it stated policy that talk pages won't be restored if the article is recreated rather than undeleted? Anything of little relevance can always be archived.
 * Anyway, can I safely add some WikiProject tags to the page, please? Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 12:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You could have done that before its restoral - as you can see, the contents are not useful, hence my decision NOT to undelete. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 12:49, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Yes, I know I could have done that. But I didn't know whether the page contained valid discussions or not. It didn't seem to be a good idea to create a new page containing WikiProject banners if the deleted page contained relevant material. Sorry to drag this out but I'd just like to know whether the talk page is likely to be imminently deleted again (I understand that if the article is deleted in the future, the talk page will follow). (And regarding whether the contents are useful, the statement by Crxssi "it is good practice to state what you are doing and *why*. This can be done in the box called "Edit summary" and possibly also here" could indeed be useful to whoever the message was directed at.) Anyway, I've now included the banners on the old page and hope that's OK. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Tamara Brooks
reasoning -LeonardoCiampa (talk) 11:23, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Tamara Brooks was one of the most important female conductors and one of the most important choral conductors of her time. It was surprising to me to read the questioning of her "importance" when the article clearly demonstrated her widespread international successes. See also here: http://necmusic.edu/tamara-brooks-1941-2012  I consider this deletion to be in error. LeonardoCiampa (talk) 11:23, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Not only was there significant issues related to copyright, the entire article was unreferenced. As such, although there may have been weak claims of notability, they were not supported whatsoever.  As you have access to source material (remember: primary sources are invalid, and WP:COPYRIGHT cannot be broken), you might be better off drafting a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT before proceeding ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:40, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

CSS Publishing Company
reasoning -Cspar.css (talk) 12:20, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I see the request for deletion due to advertising of company. I was not finished with the page. I was hoping to have some time to fix some things- per the guidelines. This company is very important in creation of tools for preaching in past 40 years and should be made note of on Wikipedia. I will work on complying with guidelines as best as possible and remove anything that appears to be advertising. I only meant page to be informational. I just imported alot of things from other places, which were meant for advertising- therein lies the error. Please give me some time to make these changes. Thanks, cspar.css
 * See the editor's talkpage ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 22:01, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Sérgio Kato
wish to have the article undeleted, because this Article based on the personal Information from this Person himself, the Biography is about! -95.91.241.79 (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * As per our biographies of living persons policy, we must insist on valid third party reliable sources for any and all claims/statements. The "article" was full of primary sources, which are unacceptable.  IMDB, blogs, youtube, etc are also not valid. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 21:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

kandanvilai
reasoning -101.212.124.110 (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * We have never had a page called Kandanvilai. To help us locate the page you mean, please give the exact spelling of its name, or the username of the user who created it. JohnCD (talk) 10:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

The Chapel Studios
We wish to have the article reinstated as it is a key source of advertising, it provides a key understanding of the history, the facilities we provide and what we do at Chapel Studios. There is no false/foul content on the article; it simply states facts about our organisation, and references projects that Chapel Studios have been associated with. So if you could please reinstate the article, it would be much appreciated. - Chapel Studios — Preceding unsigned comment added by StevenChapelWilliams (talk • contribs) 15:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above is the exact reason to not undelete it. Wikipedia may never be used as a medium for advertising or marketing.  This is an encyclopedia, not a business directory.  An encyclopedia does not care about the services you provide, and should not be used as such.  ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 16:10, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

The Chapel Studios
{{subst:refund|1= The Chapel Studios |2= I have just recently started at the Chapel Studios and have misinformed you. I quite frequently look at wikipedia for information and was quick to realise that there wasn't an article about the studios. I realise the purpose of inclusion on wikipedia is not for advertising but purely for information. Im sorry for any confusion. Thank you

Nathaniel Brown — Preceding unsigned comment added by StevenChapelWilliams (talk • contribs) 16:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px]] Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles_for_deletion/The_Chapel_Studios, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 17:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Rustam Akhmyarov (Chechen leader)
This expired prod was closed a long time ago, but the prod placer didn't leave a heads-up on my talk page, so I only learned of it now. Since this is from a long time ago the article may not meet current standards, I am just going to request userification. -Geo Swan (talk) 17:38, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Content has been userfied to User:Geo Swan/Rustam Akhmyarov (Chechen leader). User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 17:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Punch Sulzberger Award
The prod placer didn't bother to leave a heads-up on my talk page, and I only became aware of the prod now. The justification was "total lack of notability" -- which I would have disputed. Granted, the award is not as notable as a pullitzer. Only those working for a paper in the New York Times group are eligible. But the NYTimes owns regional papers all over the world, so this is a large pool of journalists. Because it has been a while, I request userification, not restoration to article space. -Geo Swan (talk) 18:21, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Geo Swan (talk) 18:21, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ to User:Geo Swan/Punch Sulzberger Award. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 25 May 2012 (UTC)