Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 79

Contact (word game)
content was unsourced because no sources yet exist. I have searched extensively for the origin and official rules of this particular game but have found nothing on the internet thus far other than a few personal webpages despite the fact that this game is very widespread at several universities in my state. it would be wise to have this as a wiki page simply so internet users can see them and add to them according to how they play this game since we constantly encounter different groups of people who play with slightly different rules. -108.194.169.124 (talk) 06:12, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a How To guide or set of instructions (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Yespetshopboys.jpg
In discussion, this image is not eligible for Commons because of United Kingdom's very low threshold of originality. I'll have it nominated for deletion. -George Ho (talk) 11:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I changed to JPG and its file name because this revision has the old name and I've checked other revisions. --George Ho (talk) 11:46, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Timer reset. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:45, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Petals Around the Rose
The game of dice is notable enough for inclusion, and lack of notability is the reason it was deleted through PROD. -ZtObOr 19:17, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please try to establish its asserted notability better.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Futz!
This is a TV show, the existence of which is easily verified, and so to which A1 doesn't apply. -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 13:07, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * A1 certainly did count - there was zero content other than a Wikilink to Nelvana. Note also that "existence" and "notability" are 2 different things (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Your statement contradicts both WP:CSD ("Caution is needed when using this tag on newly created articles.") and WP:N (given that any TV show is virtually guaranteed to satisfy all of the criteria). I would therefore ask that you reconsider. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 16:35, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done No, there's no contradiction: the article was deleted a full 45 minutes after its "creation". There are multiple possible CSD categories this could have fit in.  See WP:FIRSTARTICLE for the basic requirements for an article to remain.  See WP:AFC or WP:USERSPACEDRAFT for your way forward.  Do no try to argue that a basically blank article deserves to remain on Wikipedia (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

The Demigodz
This group of musicians has quite a following and individual members have Wikipedia pages. The page was apparently deleted because the article lacked references. The page should be restored to allow for references to be added. -Ras ebisu (talk) 21:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

These artists have been making music since before the inception of Wikipedia. They deserve a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.181.188.159 (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Demigodz-one of the 10 albums in my lifetime I have purchased, They have a huge loyal following, and make great Music. Bring Demigodz page back! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.36.86.218 (talk) 22:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

As a fan of Demigodz group, I would like to request that the group's page be undeleted. They are a very relevant hip hop group that has existed for several year, has toured internationally, and gained a large following. The leading Demigods members Apathy and Celph Titled have a following of over 60,000 fans on Facebook alone. The group has worked with several prominent hip hop groups and artists including DJ Premiere, Army of the Pharaohs, RA The Rugged Man, Diabolic, Vinnie Paz, Cyprus Hill, Jedi Mind Tricks, Fort Minor, and many many more.

The removal of the page is insulting to the thousands of supporters of Demigodz and other underground music, and counterproductive to the Wikipedia's credibility as an encyclopedia that includes artists and musicians. I strongly urge Wikipedia to reverse this action and continue to provide information about one of the most influential and well-regarded groups in underground hip hop.

Thank you - Trevor -69.137.255.183 (talk) 22:26, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I am looking at this, but considering Articles for deletion/Demigodz (2nd nomination). Articles for deletion/Demigodz had a no consensus.  The recent recreations were also copyright violations.  Cindamuse should reconsider the G4 deletion, because the article is different, and has many more new references, so G4 does not apply. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I would like to add that even Apathy, a member of this group, wanted Wikipedia to review this article to undelete it on twitter. (https://twitter.com/ApathyDGZ/status/265912016290582528). JoyRider (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC) From according to Facebook; The fan base for Apathy is 22,692. The fan base for Ryu and DJ Cheapshot (who are also in group Styles of Beyond 18,057. Celph Titled has a fan base of 47,706. And Esoteric of 7L & Esoteric has a fan base of 5,558. This is approximately 90'000 fans. JoyRider (talk) 19:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I would like to add, in regarding to Graeme Bartlett, I was the original creator of the first Demigodz page and admit, did breach copyright rules. This was easily spotted by a bot. I was okay with it being deleted but recreated it and this time copy-edited it and put it in my own words. Making sure I wasn't copyrighting other source of information. This time it wasn't noticed by a bot but a user realised that a page with this name had previously been deleted, so re-deleted the article. I also have (new) never before seen  information that I typed up myself (With references) that could be added to the article. JoyRider (talk) 19:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Black the Ripper
The musician now has more recognition than before. He has released a new recent album (Black is Beautiful: Volum 2) which was released last week. Also he has received many views on YouTube (just 1 milion) and had special guest appearance from Lowkey,Ghetts,Dot Rotten, and many others -JoyRider (talk) 19:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Black the Ripper, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:18, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

facebook
reasoning -luiedog 06:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Facebook has not been deleted (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Enzina Fuschini
I refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_November_12#Enzina_Fuschini, strongly recommending the undeletion of the article. --Jpvandijk (talk) 11:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Enzina Fuschini, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much BWilkins for the advice. being the first time that an article I wrote was deleted I am not aware of the procedures in Wikipedia.

If I find some time, and I find it also of sufficient importance to dedicate more time to the argument, I will proceed with adressing the administrator, and if necessary placing it on the deletion review as I understand this is the correct procedure. I am a bit busy in this period, and therefore do not have a lot of time, which does not help Wikipedia a lot to become objective being so much dependent on how much time people have or retain to have time for WP, but well that's life. --Jpvandijk (talk) 12:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh and oops I forget to mention that, of course, as you made me aware the article was not deleted but redirected actually. --Jpvandijk (talk) 12:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

UFC on Fox: Evans vs. Davis
I am building 2012 in UFC (see User:Oskar Liljeblad/2012 in UFC) and I need access to the deleted article's contents. If possible, mail it to me via emailuser. -Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Nevermind, the contents is already there, only replaced. Sorry. Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

UFC on Fuel TV: Sanchez vs. Ellenberger
I am building 2012 in UFC (see User:Oskar Liljeblad/2012 in UFC) and I need the contents of this article so that it can be incorporated into the 2012 page. If possible, please mail it to me via emailuser. Thanks in advance! -Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File:PetSopBoysIntrospective.jpg
Per discussion, this album cover may still be copyrightable in the UK because of the country's low level of originality. -George Ho (talk) 12:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Timer reset. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Nellie_Snyder_Yost_portrait.jpg
reasoning -Yotsuya48 (talk) 19:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

The image in question is an author portrait provided by the author's estate and was specifically taken during the author's life for use in promotional materials and any error in how the photo was uploaded and license selected should not disqualify this image from being on wikipedia. The licensing options listed when I uploaded it seemed to indicate that I had chosen the correct option, so I do not know what I did wrong and would appreciate help in selecting the correct license for a photo of this nature. I rarely log in to wikipedia and I just saw the message today so I am responding today. If the photo cannot be retrieved, I can upload it again, but I need assistant to select the correct license for a photo of this nature. Yotsuya48 (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I've (just) retrieved the image. It needs a so called fair use rationale. See Non-free use rationale guideline and the links on your talk page, also where you cna get further assistance. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

KUNG FU HD
Improvement & Expansion on Notability & References -LONGEDDY (talk) 21:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC) LONGEDDY (talk) 21:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:LONGEDDY/Kung Fu HD. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, once you're happy please contact, the administrator who deleted the page per Articles for deletion/Kung Fu HD, about it. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:04, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

UFC_155
Was deleted per some bizarre WP:NOT arguments despite an overall consensus towards keep. Was deleted on a more confusing basis than the FX or Fuel cards that were deleted, as well. -Byuusetsu (talk) 12:35, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/UFC 155, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:25, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

A_Moonclad_Reflection
This Article Was Deleted For Being An Un-Notable Demo Album, But I However Believe That It Was A Great Album And That The Article Previously Posted Was Accurate And Should For No Reason Have Been Deleted, As The Band Who Created Thus Demo, Is Great And Awesome.. I Dont Know, I Just Love The Demo And I Think It Should Be Represented Equally As The Other Albums Because It, In Essence, Created The Music Fusion That Made The Band What It Is Today. -205.206.103.77 (talk) 03:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately WP:ILIKEIT is not a valid reason for non-deletion. See WP:MUSIC for more (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:53, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

it.jobs.bg/f1514040
I want to see the description -Todor.pavlov (talk) 12:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌. This page is for requesting undeletion of Wikipedia pages. The page you are asking about was on another site, jobs.bg, which is nothing to do with Wikipedia: you should approach jobs.bg directly. JohnCD (talk) 12:19, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Consultative Group to Assist the Poor
This article was deleted with the reasoning "NON notable unsourced vanity piece.Appears to lack the sufficient notability criteria". However, CGAP is a well-known resource in the field of Microfinance and is part of the World Bank Group. CGAP is used as a citation for many articles on Wikipedia (ie branchless banking, microfinance, microcredit to name a few). Here are several web articles that mention CGAP: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/14/4984964/cgap-and-ideoorg-collaborate-to.html and http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-04-06/news/31300200_1_financial-inclusion-cgap-financial-access and http://blogs.cgdev.org/open_book/2011/12/careful-new-review-of-randomized-trials-of-microfinance.php. CGAP recently relaunched its website so some URLs in the original article may need to be corrected. -Stag05 (talk) 19:00, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Their own website wouldn't be acceptable as a source (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

That's fine, here are a few other sources: http://mastercardfdn.org/Projects/consultative-group-to-assist-the-poor-cgap and http://www.microcapital.org/microfinanceuniverse/tiki-index.php?page=CGAP+(Consultative+Group+to+Assist+the+Poor) and http://www.omidyar.com/portfolio/consultative-group-assist-poor-cgap and http://gpfi.org/about-gpfi/partners/consultative-group-assist-poor for instance. Thank you for your attention to this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stag05 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Press releases are not reliable sources, however the promotional piece you created yesterday has your name on the on the bottom .."Contact: Erin ..", evidenced by your userpage.. "Hi, my name is Erin". Please see WP:NOPAY and WP:NOT. In Addition to your conflict of interest and SEO, there is an extensive history of spam, promotional abuse and exploitation of Wikipedia by your  group. and Microfinance Gateway sock spamming case (project of CGAP). Wikipedia is NOT a "vehicle for advertising" . Equally Wikipedia is not a place to to promote CGAP. --Hu12 (talk) 20:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Produsage
Seems that this was deleted a while ago as a neologism. Perhaps back in 2009 that might've been justified, today it is a term that has entered scientific discourse (numerous sources can be found through Google Books and Scholar). I have no idea if there is anything salvageable in the entry, but I think it can be restored nonetheless - in either case, I intend to create an article on that subject, properly referenced, for a DYK entry, and it would be nice to have the full article's history, even if just for attribution, if I have to rewrite everything. If the entry is a total piece of crap, please userfy it for me so I can verify that myself. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC) -Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  20:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Produsage, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  03:57, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Dyad (Greek philosophy)
original was due PROD the talk page was deleted by same user so reasoning for deletion is not available. the page may be worthless but id like to know. -Stan318 (talk) 21:21, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Endorse. At the very least, this concept seems serious enough to merit a proper AfD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I've also restored the linked talk page Talk:Pentad (Greek philosophy). Let me know if you want that page as well or in case you come upon inspection to the conclusion that it isn't worth it. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

homes.com
was deleted for being not notable. Site receives over 10 million monthly visitors and is currently ranked #5 in real estate by Comscore and Hitwise. If needed I can supply countless mainstream media references (not PR's). I can also (objectively) edit the page if the previous content was questionable. -Dhoegerm (talk) 20:26, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done By Explicit. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

S.J. Ramprashan
accidentally deleted the page on November 6th. This article was not intended to be deleted by user Sharan.satku initially created in August 2012. Kindly restore the page. -Sharan.satku (talk) 02:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Brought up also at User_talk:Malik_Shabazz and aswered there. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:11, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Artemis Records
Huge number of backlinks, and a lot of entries in Category:Artemis Records albums. I have a suspicion that the A7 deletion was invalid. - Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done by Fayenatic London. Tikiwont (talk) 10:15, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Hearts XP.png
This image was incorrectly removed from the article Hearts (Windows) and subsequently deleted as an orphaned fair use image. -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 20:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Timer reset. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Dahl Mobile
The article has enough references to prove that it is a legal company and not a bogus one. Some users here requested so hard for its deletion because of few external links but the company is newly establihed. -OptiStar (talk) 12:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Dahl Mobile, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. On a side note, there's no suggestion anywhere that the company does not exist.  However, on the English Wikipedia, there is a requirement for notability not existence - unlike on some other language projects.  See WP:CORP for more details (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cho_Min_Hye
According to the verifiability page a link to the work itself or a publisher of the work is considered verified. The sources provided on the stub verified the very minimal facts presented: date of birth, name, and musical works. I don't follow how there were no "reputable" sources. -Blackheart0113 (talk) 19:28, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. This was deleted as a BLPPROD. There were two sources on the article when the BLPPROD was added.  GB fan 20:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Survivor Series (2012)
reasoning -24.59.163.4 (talk) 02:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. This is being discussed at Articles for deletion/Survivor Series (2012).--Tikiwont (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Frankie Bones
Why was this deleted? People need to learn their facts before marking something as non-notable. Frank was a pioneer of American techno music. See http://thedjlist.com/djs/FRANKIE_BONES/bio/ -98.207.18.199 (talk) 04:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please supply more citations. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Vishaal Nityanand
reasoning -223.232.21.59 (talk) 18:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Feel free to comment at Articles for deletion/Vishaal Nityanand --Tikiwont (talk) 20:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Southern Organization for Live Action Reenactments
The article was PROD'd in 2008. I'm working on the subject in my userspace, but I wanted to restore the old version of the article to see if there was any content or sources to help build the article with. Can someone please restore this article to my user space? -SudoGhost 19:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:SudoGhost/Southern Organization for Live Action Reenactments. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

UFC on Fuel TV: Korean Zombie vs. Poirier
I am building 2012 in UFC (see User:Oskar Liljeblad/2012 in UFC) and I need the contents of this article so that it can be incorporated into the 2012 page. If possible, please mail it to me via emailuser. Thanks in advance! Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2012 (UTC) -Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The original version of this had already been restored to and is still at User:Newmanoconnor/UFC on Fuel TV: Korean Zombie vs. Poirier. Some others as well but have been hastily moved back to main or later recreated without the edit history and with the already messy edit histories and our need for attribution I'd advise against e-mailing content that you actually want to use also with respect to the adjacent requests. Moreover, I note that 2012 in UFC events itself has been deleted perArticles for deletion/2012 in UFC events (4th nomination) and List of UFC events in 2012 is currently at AfD. So I'd suggest you focus on the big picture first and write some well sourced prose for those events. Once the main article is up and agreed upon to be notable, details can still be added content restored under redirects for merging. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your suggestion. In fact, I am already doing that (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts). As for the article: are you sure that is the latest version? There are no results in there, but the article was deleted long after the event actually occurred. Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 20:53, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

UFC on FX: Johnson vs. McCall
I am building 2012 in UFC (see User:Oskar Liljeblad/2012 in UFC) and I need the contents of this article so that it can be incorporated into the 2012 page. If possible, please mail it to me via emailuser. Thanks in advance! Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2012 (UTC) -Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

UFC on FX: Maynard vs. Guida
I am building 2012 in UFC (see User:Oskar Liljeblad/2012 in UFC) and I need the contents of this article so that it can be incorporated into the 2012 page. If possible, please mail it to me via emailuser. Thanks in advance! Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC) -Oskar Liljeblad (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Niels povlsen
the page is about my father who passed away 8 months ago. I'm very interested in reading the content -87.104.167.120 (talk) 20:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. and not one at Niels Povlsen either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The best I can do is point you to the Danish version at da:Niels Poulsen, it never linked to an English edition. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:49, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

List of locations used in Transformers: Prime
Please userify this for me so I can transfer it to Wikialpha.org -Mathewignash (talk) 02:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ see User:Mathewignash/List of locations used in Transformers: Prime Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:09, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

alina abbas
reasoning -FAZALskb (talk) 11:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Zementis
The Zementis page contains valuable information about company history and products pertinent to the open standards and predictive analytics communities. Company pages are important for users to have a 360 degree view of the landscape in a certain industry, specially if such an industry moves as fast as the pace of technology. In this particular case, Zementis is a leader in Big Data and predictive analytics, two of the hottest topics in information processing. Besides, it is a PMML powerhouse. PMML is an open-standard used by the entire data mining community to represent predictive models. Zementis products are transformative in which the combine open-standards and predictive analytics to solve the Big Data challenge. For this reason, the Zementis page is extremely valuable in Wikipedia. As any company page, it was deleted for being perceived as mere marketing, which does not apply here. -Sunsetsky (talk) 22:41, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Bullpuckey. The article started by saying Zementis "is a software company focused on predictive analytics"; then turned into an advertisement for "predictive analytics" as the next big thing for businesses smart enough to use Zementis products. The promotional tone was as bad as or worse than the above post by Sunsetsky, and that's saying something. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  00:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Estakhr's Constant (physics)
reasoning -5.122.201.136 (talk) 06:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

i found this article: Estakhr Constant (physics) interesting.

why it was deleted!? I want to use the paper for my research.

while you have an article like this:Worldsheet in wikipedia without any reference this is not fair to delete this one Estakhr Constant (physics)

i think it can be confirmed in Wikipedia as a non peer-reviewed physics paper — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.122.201.136 (talk) 07:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Estakhr's Constant (physics), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the User:Fram who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. Lectonar (talk) 09:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

article was deleted with 'NO' scientific reason!. i use google cached webpage, article was really interesting!. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.120.19.66 (talk) 09:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Bump (Internet)
Pages link to it and it is a topic that deserves to be on Wikipedia. -Port A Build (talk) 03:34, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I also recreated necropost and necrobumping, are there any other alaises? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Gauntlet Hair
Contesting PROD. The press coverage of this band's last album easily will pass WP:MUSIC. -Chubbles (talk) 07:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Jeff Duran
new article/subject -JosephDann (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC) — JosephDann (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Jeff Duran, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

United People's Party (UK)
reasoning -193.130.78.102 (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/United People's Party (UK), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  16:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Sufian Younas Khan
reasoning -Stevenparkerukpi (talk) 18:14, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

This page was important because this man sufian younas khan did a lot of thing in Wah Cantt Pakistan for welfare cause like social campaigns, provided employment, introduced 1st Call center in wah cantt and started Free Training for Gym and Karate.

I will request you to undelete this page.
 * Well Sufian younas khan was deleted because of no claim of importance. Do you have any references to show any of the information is correct? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:44, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

it:CSOA La Strada
reasoning -82.49.193.204 (talk) 14:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

I linked this article (Italian Wikipedia, title "CSOA La Strada") some time ago from openstreetmap, and by the time I was reviewing the article and it made sense to link against, recently I found it deleted. Maybe the user deleted also other Stuff?

I tried to undelete it myself, but than found a message that undeletions were restricted to admins.

thank you, Martin


 * ❌. There has never been a page CSOA La Strada here on the English Wikipedia. The Italian Wikipedia is a separate organization with its own rules and standards. The Italian page was deleted there after this discussion, and you should approach the Italian administrator who closed it, whose name you can find at the foot of the discussion. JohnCD (talk)

Full Throttle Media
I believe I made changes the conform with the Wikipedia guidelines. Admittedly, I was not familiar with the Wikipedia guidelines and am still learning the site. Any advice you have for me would be appreciated. -Full Throttle Media (talk) 16:38, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Usernames here must represent people, not companies. And you should not write about your own company, as it will be very hard for you to not promote it. The page you talked about User:Full Throttle Media contained promotional text. Dubious content includes "the vision we have" "highly developed" "break out brand" "high-quality, innovative" "We fully embrace the challenge" "cutting edge" "Our brand" "groundbreaking" "RJ understands" "we are welcomed into the inner circle" "is a testament to the desire" and so on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Username-blocked, explained WP:UPNOT, WP:COI, WP:CORP etc. JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Yves Arman
page is referenced with links in many related pages and was about to be completed with more information, like the french page on the same article, which is not deleted -Faranne (talk) 01:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * As it's an expired WP:PROD, it can be undeleted - however, I would highly recommend that it be immediately move out of articlespace into a personal sandbox as a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. There's nothing there that remotely hints at the notability requirements on the English Wikipedia which are very very different than the French Wikipedia.  In other words, it will immediately be WP:AFD'd, and was originally eligible for immediate deletion in the first place.  (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅. Bwilkins' advice is good. I have "userfied" the page to User:Faranne/Yves Arman where you can work on it. As it was deleted by PROD, you are free to move it back to the main encyclopedia, but in its present state it would certainly be sent to WP:Articles for deletion. Advice on your talk page later today. JohnCD (talk) 12:14, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Grate_(band)
a7 -188.2.33.214 (talk) 14:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello,

My name is Goran Beg, and i'm one of memebers of Grate band. Please, i don't understand why are you delete our band wiki page. It's normal wiki page, like other bands have. If we make some mistake, plase let us know.

It's very important for us to have wiki page for our band. We play rock/metal music since 2007, so plase tell us what to do.

Thank you.
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 14:26, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Groove (Transformers)
Please userify so I can work on the page. Thanks! -Mathewignash (talk) 15:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Nyttend (talk) 05:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Dean Constantin
reasoning -LaGloiredujour (talk) 15:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Please also note, you may not create articles about people you represent as an agent, manager, or other promotional reasons (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:00, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Issues In Darusman Report
I have reverted the copyright issues and wrote the article on my words after claiming it has copyright problems. But still it has been deleted. -Himesh84 (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rasamalai
OK, it seems I had an user page that was deleted, I'm copy pasting the e-mail notification I got in some British language I don's speak, perhaps Scottish: Please monitor whomever was trying to delete it since it seems like a trigger happy person who never bothered to contact me first to see if I'm a real person or not, and whatever happens I hope he never gets to run anything on your website.ç

Best regards, Claudia Liliana/rasamalai

Dear Rasamalai,

the Wikipedia page User talk:Rasamalai haes been creatit on 26 November 2012 bi MF-Warburg, see http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rasamalai for the current version.

This is a new page.

Editor's summary: content wis: ' ' (an the ae contreibutor wis '99.237.226.18')

Contact the editor: mail http://sco.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Emailuser&target=MF-Warburg wiki http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MF-Warburg

The will be nae ither notifications in case o faurer chynges unless ye visit this page. Ye cuid reset the notification flags for aa yer watched pages on yer watchleet forbye.

Yer freendlie Wikipedia notification seestem

-- Tae chynge yer watchleet settins, visit http://sco.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Watchlist&edit=yes

Feedback an faurer assistance: http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents

reasoning -Rasamalai (talk) 07:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Your user page on the English Wikipedia has never been deleted. It appears you created a page on the Scots Wikipedia, which was deleted - that's a different website, and we at en-wiki have no control over what they do there. The messages above all refer to sco-wiki (which also explains the dialect. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  08:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Welcome and advice added on user's en:wp talk page. JohnCD (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Dakota (musician)
This article has been created, and used correctly following wiki's guidelines. It was created by myself who is a fan and wanted to give accurate details about their fellow Chicago artist. There are ACCURATE cites, yes all of which are blogs, but they are straight from the artists page or pages with notable credibility. This page has only been edited by one member because of the validity of the sources and to my knowledge, there is not much info that must be changed except minor edits. I have followed all of Wiki's guidelines, rules, and provided accurate and quality information that people have been searching the internet for. This page should NOT have been deleted. Please reconsider your decision. Thank you -TheCANNON123 (talk) 12:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Dakota (musician), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Lectonar (talk) 12:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Bonnee Buttered Beef Steaks
reasoning -65.12.201.178 (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

01:18, 28 September 2012 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted page Bonnee Buttered Beef Steaks (Expired PROD, concern was: non-notable product.)

Please restore my article about Bonnee Buttered Beef Steaks. This product is no longer sold, but it was widely sold from the mid 1940's to the mid 1960's in the US, and a lot of baby boomers remember them fondly and wonder what happened to the company that made them. Thank you for your consideration of my request.
 * Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Lectonar (talk) 13:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * See: Bonnee Buttered Beef Steaks

Paul B. Wiegmann
the article was deleted because of copyright infringement. This was a simple glitch which is easy to correct. I request the restoration of the article in my user space so that I could correct the glitch -Awwriter (talk) 13:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Awwriter (talk) 13:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page is a copyright violation. We do not even restore those to userspace. Lectonar (talk) 13:55, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Maverick 58 Classic Rock Band
I Saved in English Wikipedia by mistake, need the text to portuguese wikipedia, could you email me, took me a couple of hours writeng -Camabap (talk) 18:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done sent via mail. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Caitlin Kelly
Administrator who deleted the page claimed it was an advertisement. The page was about a luxury swimwear designer that was created in a similar fashion to that of Rachael Zoe, the stylist. When asked for additional information, the administrator refused to elaborate. -Tamara Walker (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Promotional garbage like "These programs pushed her harder than she had ever been pushed creatively, but she flourished under the pressure and scrutiny. As a result of her hard work and unwavering tenacity" has no place in an encyclopedia article. The deleting admin was very right. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;  Talk  08:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 08:29, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Dale J. Stephens
Looks like the page was automatically deleted after the tag WP:PROD had remained on the page for seven days. Checked google archives and the page has sources from CNN, The New York Times, ABC, among others, so it meets the notability for WP:BLP. -Godfatherscookies (talk) 22:12, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Disagree: after discussion on the Talk page, Stephens failed to meet the basic criteria for WP:BIO or WP:BLP given WP:WHYN and WP:N (and some instances of WP:SPIP). Coverage in the media is not, in and of itself, sufficient criteria for notability. Further, specifically on his book, it must actually be published before he meets the criteria for being an author. Steuben (talk) 22:37, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Stephens has an overwhelming quantity and quality of press to meet notability for living people. These are from the most credible, reliable sources publications possible: Inc. Magazine: http://www.inc.com/magazine/201109/peter-thiel-college-dropouts.html CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/18/opinion/bennett-thiel-education/index.html Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/youth-radio-youth-media-international/creator-of-uncollege-gets_b_871214.html?ref=tw The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/dale-stephens-unschoolers-create-their-education/2011/08/22/gIQAp3VMjJ_story.html ABC: http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/education&id=8151836 New York Magazine: http://nymag.com/news/features/college-education-2011-5/index4.html

The page should be restored based on those sources alone. Godfatherscookies (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * We did consider that, but the sources had no further insight into his notability other than a self-appointed expert. The number of sources (and quality) still, in this case, don't justify encyclopedic record—at least not until he's accomplished something "notable," which the discussion failed to show. Again, this seems to be rehashing what was actually in the article and not discussion of the article itself; these arguments were made and addressed in the Talk page so until something changes, it doesn't belong. I'm actually actively looking for someone who knows him (and I know people) to try to see if there's something to be revived here, but no luck thus far. Steuben (talk) 23:40, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. It may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a discussion lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 15:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Sardar Mahadik family Gwalior
reasoning -114.143.120.89 (talk) 09:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svgNot done That page was deleted in a community discussion, and this page isn't for challenging the results of deletion discussions like that. If you believe that the deletion discussion concluded wrongly, please go to WP:DRV to contest it, since (unlike here) that page is set up to evaluate malformed deletion discussions.  Nyttend (talk) 15:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: - recreated at Sardar Mahadik Family Gwalior, tagged G4. JohnCD (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

User:Dom497/AFC Newsletter
Requesting undelete to User:Nathan2055/sandbox/afcnewsletter. I know it's weird because it's another users userpage, but if you look at the history you can see I was a major contributor. -Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Yes, definitely unusual, but since userspace pages don't 100% belong to their users, there's nothing inappropriate here. Thanks for pointing out that you were a major contributor; I might not have made that connection if you hadn't mentioned it, and I wouldn't undelete someone else's userpage without a good reason.  Nyttend (talk) 23:35, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Nyttend! Dom said to me on his talk page that he isn't interested in the newsletter project any more, so I'm going to take it over. --Nathan2055talk - contribs 04:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

flight level aviation
reasoning -98.111.233.114 (talk) 03:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done That page was deleted in a community discussion, and this page isn't for challenging the results of deletion discussions like that. If you believe that the deletion discussion concluded wrongly, please go to WP:DRV to contest it, since (unlike here) that page is set up to evaluate malformed deletion discussions.  Alternatively, you could present multiple reliable sources that discuss this company in depth, since the sole reason that it was deleted is that it didn't appear to have sufficient reliable sources that covered it.  Nyttend (talk) 03:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Shivnarayanpur,mathurapur
I cannot understand why this was deleted under G1. It only had some grammatical mistakes - Anbu121 ( talk me ) 16:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: the first half may have made some sense, but the second half was entirely uncomprehensible. Can you explain what "Shivnarayanpur  are in " followed by a list of things that includes "DJ Masters" actually means?? There also was not even a single reference to be found (✉→BWilkins←✎) 17:45, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * As far as I can remember, the list included things/places/shops that were present in the village. But, even then, how come G1 applies to it? Isn't G1 supposed to be for an article where you don't understand what the article is talking about. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 19:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, and the second half of the article made the entire article nonsensical (✉→BWilkins←✎) 19:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Its just poor writing and poor grammar. I still feel that deleting it under G1 is unjust. I will clean it up, if restored. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 20:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Anbu121, 50% of the edits on that article were yours, including explicitly claiming in an edit summary that you were performing a "clean up". Yet, this is the result;
 * This is is incoherent gibberish(G1). I'm not confident this will survive inclusion if restored.--Hu12 (talk) 05:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Initially I removed some irrelevant text at the bottom of the article. Then I rephrased the first sentence and added wikilinks. To rephrase the above quoted text, I was googling to find some source. But the article was deleted before I could do so. Do you think, I am not capable of cleaning this up. Believe me, I have written a GA. In any case, I still wouldn't accept that the quoted text is G1, its just poor writing and poor grammar by a person who is semi-literate. The intention of this quoted text is to communicate that the neighbouring village 'mathurapur' has some rich people, but the village 'Shivnarayanpur' (subject of the article) is not in a impoverished condition and that the village has a market, some showrooms, police station, bus stand, park, etc. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 05:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how any of the above is relevant? A list of shops and base services is not appropriate in any article (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if irrelevant, how will that come under G1? Even if you delete this entire sentence from the article, the first sentence alone stating that it is a village is sufficient for a stub. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 17:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I have recreated the stub for you at Shivnarayanpur. There seems to be enough evidence online that this exists. Please add references and categories etc. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I really didn't expect this amount of resistance and defending for a mistake. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 11:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I really didn't expect this amount of resistance and defending for a mistake. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 11:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)