Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 93

World Security Network Foundation
The article has been deleted "speedily" without discussion yesterday. The arguments given for deletion were that the article would (a) include publicity, that it might (b) violate copyrights and/or that it (c) might not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. I would like to discuss these points. As to (a): This is partially correct. The tone of the article was very positive, which however seems to be due to the subject matter. The WSNF is a non-profit organization aiming at promoting peace, international cooperation as well as tolerance and respect among different cultures and religions. It is not so easy to write critically about this. However, the article can be improved in this respect to include less of the organisation's own ideas. As to (b): The copyright objection hasn't been specified. I think it is unsubstantiated. As to (c): The WSNF is an international non-profit NGO operating in more than 30 countries since 11 years. Its online media reach severeal 100.000 recipients, most of them multipliers. So I think the World Security Network Foundation is notable for Wikipedia both as an NGO and as a medium. -DownUnder36 (talk) 08:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. The copyright issue was with the previous (2009) version, not this one; but see Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. Being a Noble Cause does not exempt an organization from the notability requirement to show references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Your references are only to the WSN's own publications; you need to show that people independent of it have thought it important enough to write substantial comment about. Also, your article reads very much as the WSN telling the world about itself - see User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard. Think hard about notability, and read WP:N, WP:CORP, WP:BFAQ. If you think you can show notability, I will "userfy" the article for you - undelete it into a sub-page in your user space where you can work on it. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Young Boys Haarlem
The article was deleted by User:Jimfbleak, who only stated that A7 was applicable. I, however, think that the article meets/meeted the notability standards for clubs. The scope of their activities was national in scale: the club played in the Saturday Hoofdklasse A, a national football league in the Netherlands. Also, information about the club and its activities can be verified by multiple, third-party, independent, reliable sources. If necessary, I will edit the page and add more of those sources.

I initially created the page because the club had (and again has a red link on the 2011-12 Hoofdklasse page. I also made pages for the other clubs and none of them were nominated for deletion. Young Boys Haarlem was declared bankrupt in 2012, but that is no valid argument for deletion, as per DEFUNCTS. -Dnarbys (talk) 08:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Strong vs Weak sustainability
the video clip should be undeleted as I believe it adds value to the subject with good practical examples -MBA2012E2 (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Assuming you mean File:Interview with expert on Weak vs Strong sustainability.png, this is ❌ due to this being a file for delete discussion result. See Files for deletion/2013 May 23. The reason being it does not satisfy the non free use criteria.  It is replace able and does not aid understanding. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Inbar Lavi
This actress has had notable roles and press coverage since the article was deleted in 2010. -Korny O&#39;Near (talk) 19:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please add references to the press coverage. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Alec Kirschner
Contested PROD -Dolovis (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Stivasoft
There is no advertising since this article has been written by example of one that has been accepted -- if this page has been deleted, so why other pages which I can specially point you are not. There is a lot of resources and references to be added. I followed the instruction and actually have an example of an article that had been accepted before. Administrators are unconsistent with their nominations. Point exactly where advertising and promotional language has been used in the article, because I do not agree with the deletion, language is neutral and based on facts and company events... -Gadelichka (talk) 07:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Stivasoft has never existed, however I am checking out StivaSoft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌ Using terms like "unique" "new concept" "premium project" "add value" and "Visit the official company website" sounds promotional. However about half of it was fairly neutrally written.  I would suggest that you make a Userspace draft instead and get it cleared of advertising before entering article space.  Stivasoft Hotel Booking Software Review was pure promotion, so your edits do seem to be improving. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Future Telugu Bible
Shalem Arasavelli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shalem65 (talk • contribs) 11:24, 13 June 2013‎
 * ❌. This is the English-language Wikipedia, but your submission was in Telugu. You should submit it to the Telugu Wikipedia at http://te.wikipedia.org/wiki/. JohnCD (talk) 19:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

The Wendy Walk
contested PROD -Arthur goes shopping (talk) 12:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 19:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Pablo Sebastián López
This page was speedily deleted on grounds A7, no explanation of importance, but the article clearly stated that he was a deputy on the provincial council in Salta in Argentina for 8 years, and will be a candidate in the national elections later this year. -PatGallacher (talk) 15:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Neither of those appear to meet the notability requriements as per WP:POLITICIAN, so A7 appears to be appropriate (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, I quote WP:POLITICIAN: "Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature." As an ex-member of a provincial legislature he is inherently notable.  Also, speedy deletion criterion A7 is not quite the same as notability. PatGallacher (talk) 13:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

David Harris (designer)
reasoning -Joseperez77 (talk) 02:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC) will be updating with new content and sources -Avalon3377 (talk) 02:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/David Harris (designer), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 19:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leo D. Lichteberg (schrijver)
I, 82.169.37.198, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 82.169.37.198 (talk) 10:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done Stale draft not in English. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

PC Edition
I changed it from copyright to an article, but forgot to add the website ModDB as a reference. Apologies -Aerotactics (talk) 20:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done Copyright violation of a review of a non-notable game mod still in beta. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Sightings (band)
meets notability requirements, respected underground band for over a decade, see articles at The New Yorker (http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/musical/2010/05/24/100524crmu_music_frerejones), Pitchfork (http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/14134-city-of-straw/), Village Voice (http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2013/04/sightings_new_album_qa.php) -98.191.221.2 (talk) 17:00, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please add any relevant references. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 09:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Jared Gomes (ice hockey)
Contested PROD. Meets criteria #4 of WP:NHOCKEY - CIS (AUS conference) First All-Star Team -Dolovis (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please update with references to establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 09:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International University of Fundamental Studies
I, 112.135.70.237, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 112.135.70.237 (talk) 00:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. What was deleted was Articles for creation/International University of Fundamental Studies (without the "talk" after Wikipedia), which was at the wrong title and had no content. Your actual submission is at the title linked above and has not been deleted, but was declined again for reasons explained in the notice at the top. You are welcome to continue to edit and resubmit, but it might help you to read WP:Your first article and the WP:College and university article guidelines. JohnCD (talk) 09:22, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

University of Houston Creative Writing Program
reasoning -Onthedeck (talk) 00:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Subject is a top ranked creative writing program (no. 2 and top ten respectively). Subject includes notable faculty members, many of which have their own wikipedia pages and has produced a number of successful students. UHCWP was founded by Donald Barthelme and is home to two award-winning publications. The page falls under the exemption for educational institutions.
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/University of Houston Creative Writing Program, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The exemption you refer to (a) is only from speedy-deletion and (b) applies to schools and universities, not to departments or courses within them. JohnCD (talk) 09:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

inkaura
didn't give enough time to update. Wikipedia is not about authoritarian decisions and the admins should start taking some responsibility in coordinating with authors to make this a truly community project. The high handedness of deleting without proper dialogue is totally condemnable. -Tinytrixoffer (talk) 06:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is also not about allowing people to use the project for free advertising for non notable businesses.  and will not be done. Spartaz Humbug! 17:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Celinés
I, Tito5918, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Tito5918 (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. This is the English-language Wikipedia, but your submission was written in Spanish. Also, it is a copyright violation from http://www.angelfire.com/ct3/dvonct/celines.html


 * El texto está escrito en español; además, es una violación del derecho de autor de http://www.angelfire.com/ct3/dvonct/celines.html. JohnCD (talk) 21:28, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Seattle Totems (NHL)
Article was speedy deleted. I request that this article be moved to my User's space so that it may continue to be worked on as information about this current event continues to be reported. -Dolovis (talk) 04:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Dolovis/Seattle Totems (NHL). You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 09:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kidz in the Kitchen
I, Tricia Ziemer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Tricia Ziemer (talk) 06:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Please re-instate Kidz in the Kithen. Their seventh season is going to air as of December 2014 at 4pm every Tuesday on Channel Digital 44/C31. Australian Community Broadcast Radio and C31 Melbourne - Geelong are supporting this show. I had not re-edited waiting for the release of the new season. There are also plans for it to go to air in New Zealand as well as Australia within the next 6 months. But I will update it immediately, so its place is not lost. The message fro changes came in over the weekend and I just now got the email to be able to edit and reply etc.

show still going to air again in December 2014 and also going to air in New Zealand as well as Australia and I did not realise they needed to be updated every 6 months. I do apologise and ensure my edits are within the 6 month period. I am new to wiki. -Tricia Ziemer (talk) 06:43, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Edward Pasquale
Please restore the edit history for this recently recreated article -Dolovis (talk) 21:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Landon Ferraro
Please restore the edit history for this recently recreated article -Dolovis (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Schneiden von Stahl mit Hartmetall-Sägen
I, 77.116.247.10, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 77.116.247.10 (talk) 04:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. This submission was declined because it is in German. You also submitted it to the German Wikipedia where it has been edited by other users and is now at de:Hartmetallsäge. There is an English article on the subject at Carbide Saws. JohnCD (talk) 09:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/La Stèle du rêve
 Kayax012 (talk) 04:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. This submission was declined because it is in French; also, there are already articles on the subject here in the English Wikipedia at Dream Stele and in the French Wikipedia at fr:Stèle du rêve. JohnCD (talk) 09:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Araucana
On the 7th May this year, I edited the Araucana chicken details on Wikipedia regarding the genetics of Blue Egg production. This new information was the result of 3 years of experimental breeding. A relevant article on this topic has been accepted by the Araucana breeders Group of Australia. I can send you the article if you advise me what is the best way to forward it. My edit on Wikipedia was deleted, Could you tell me what to do now. I write extensively around the world on bird genetics, mostly on budgerigar genetics and have never encountered this problem before.

Don Burke OAM from Burkes Backyard. -Burkes Backyard (talk) 08:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * as the article is not deleted. Don, unfortunately we do not typically accept original research. The I would hate to suggest that the Araucana Breeders Group would be considered to be an accepted scientific organization, as would be required to support scientific claims. That said, the Reliable Sources Noticeboard would be the best place to discuss the strength of any potential reliable source. As well, ALL edits to Wikipedia required consensus - if yours were removed due to lack of sourcing/original research, that can be understood - however, as per WP:BRD, you should try and discuss potential changes on the talkpage of the article - that is how this project functions. In the end, your genetics additions may not be accepted - so be it; I have, after all, had hundreds of edits and a half-dozen articles deleted. (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 09:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Crafter
Crafter guitars are well-known around the world, they have been around since 1962. -193.77.151.160 (talk) 12:14, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 12:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Excuse me, I cannot agree, as this is totally not true, there are numerous articles and multiple sources about Crafter guitars in various languages. Where can the links be provided? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.190.51.18 (talk) 09:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Approach the deleting administrator, user, and show links to a few references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Ask Mkdw if s/he will "userfy" the article - move it into a sub-page in your user space where you can work on it. If you do not have an account, you will need to register one, but that is easy and free. JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Skyline UF
the article was deleted supposedly because we have no "importance". This is wrong because we won a regional championship. please undelete our page asap as it is a work in progress and we will continue adding to it. -SKYLINEUFC (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Individual high school sports teams do not meet notability guidelines and the title has been rightly redirected - although I would argue that even the redirect title should not appear on Wikipedia (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 10:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Artur Gavrus
Please restore the edit history for this recently recreated article -Dolovis (talk) 19:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 08:39, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Bugei ryuha daijiten
seems to have been deleted by mistake. Do not think 'g8' criterion applies. -222.144.183.166 (talk) 02:48, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. That was a G8 deletion because it was a redirect to Bugei Ryūha Daijiten (with upper-case R and D) which has been moved to the WP:Article Incubator after a deletion debate at Articles for deletion/Bugei Ryūha Daijiten decided that the sourcing needed to be improved. It is now at WP:Article Incubator/Bugei Ryūha Daijiten and you can edit it there, but please do not move it back to the main encyclopedia without agreement from the closing administrator, user, or failing that from WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 08:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/MD Rabbi Alam also known as MD Alam
I, Aaty87, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Aaty87 (talk) 06:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. On inspection, this is largely a copyright violation from sites like Elect-MD-Alam-to-the-MIssouri-Secretary-of-State and MD Alam for KCMO District-6 At-Large - Standing against Crime & Creating a Safe Community. Wikipedia cannot hold copyrighted material unless a formal copyright release is made as described at WP:Donating copyrighted materials. That would not be worth doing in this case, because the material is far too promotional in tone for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion and is certainly not a place to post copies of "Vote-for-ME!" election material. I suggest that you read WP:Your first article and write a much shorter bio in a neutral tone. JohnCD (talk) 08:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HeavyWeight Yoga
I, Ronseybold, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Ronseybold (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Amosace
It is a growing e-commerce website in the state of West bengal, India -Mohit Shaw (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Founded in 2013? Clearly fails our tests. I suggest you read WP:UPANDCOMING. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;  Talk  18:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UK Hand Knitting Association
I, Pauliebee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Pauliebee (talk) 22:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

DANiiVORY
Apparently, this was one of a series of PRODs across multiple musicians. -William Allen Simpson (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 2013-06-16T22:58:54 – DANiiVORY (talk · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DANiiVORY&action=edit edit] · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DANiiVORY&action=history hist]) PRODed by Vividdreams93 (t · c) was [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=DANiiVORY deleted]
 * The reason given for deletion was "Not a notable figure. A search brings up nothing but social media links." Heck, since her international tour with 2NE1, she even has a Korean fan club! That only makes her more notable (Notability (music) item 4).
 * Notability was clearly detailed on the Talk page, should have been self-evident by the references section.
 * There are ample 3rd party citations and newspaper articles, all with inline citations.
 * This musician has been in multiple notable bands, and in bands with 2 or more notable musicians, and on major television (most recently Beyonce, Super Bowl and world tour). See Notability (music) items 6 and 10.
 * And a simple search for "theresa flaminio"+"Imagine Dragons" (a tour she was on for only ~7 months) yields 742 hits: several newspaper articles, numerous band interviews and tour date announcements, and concert videos by an independent producer.
 * As to "theresa flaminio"+"Cee Lo Green" (an extensive and well-reported international tour), there's just too much to detail here: 14,400 results. And those Saturday Night Live et alia TV performances are yet another qualification for notability (section 10 cited above).

In addition, I'll note for the record that Vividdreams93 had previously removed the artist's stage name from a prominent band, replacing it with her birth name:
 * 2013-02-21T04:28:34‎ Vividdreams93 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (32,614 bytes) (+21)‎ has no log comment

Other pages and redirects will need to be restored as well:
 * 2013-06-16T23:03:35 Ronhjones (talk | contribs) deleted page Talk:DANiiVORY (G8: Talk page of a deleted page)
 * 2013-06-17T04:12:58 Tokyogirl79 (talk | contribs) deleted page Dani Ivory (G8: Redirect to a deleted or non-existent page)
 * 2013-06-17T16:16:34 INeverCry (talk | contribs) deleted page Theresa Flaminio (G8: Redirect to a deleted or non-existent page)
 * 2013-06-17T16:16:34 INeverCry (talk | contribs) deleted page Talk:Theresa Flaminio (G8: Talk page of a deleted page)

Note that failed to follow policy, which clearly states:

--William Allen Simpson (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ as a contested prod. No comment on the appropriateness of the deletion. Spartaz Humbug! 13:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Dapo Torimiro
Apparently, this was one of a series of PRODs across multiple musicians. -William Allen Simpson (talk) 00:34, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 2013-06-16T22:58:48 – Dapo Torimiro (talk · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dapo_Torimiro&action=edit edit] · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dapo_Torimiro&action=history hist]) PRODed by Vividdreams93 (t · c) was [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Dapo_Torimiro deleted]
 * This was a mere 6 seconds before DANiiVORY. See timestamp.
 * The reason given for deletion was "Not a notable figure. A search brings up nothing but social media links." This is the same as DANiiVORY (above)!!!
 * Notability was self-evident by the references section. There are ample citations.
 * For goodness sake, this is a multi-platinum musician! See Notability (music) item 3:

Also restore:
 * 2013-06-16T23:03:39 Ronhjones (talk | contribs) deleted page Talk:Dapo Torimiro (G8: Talk page of a deleted page)

I've checked the deletions log for, which indicates he's certainly not checking actual veracity of PRODs! He deleted hundreds of PRODs each a few seconds apart. This is contrary to policy Proposed deletion, which states that each administrator must

--William Allen Simpson (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ as a contested prod. Spartaz Humbug! 13:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Halogen_Software
Since the article a number of important changes have happened at Halogen, notably the company went public on the TSX just a few weeks ago. I currently work at Halogen, and would like to create a version of the page that is consistent with Wikipedia's content policies. -Mikeypotter (talk) 13:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Please also see WP:COI. Perhaps you should let someone who doesn't have a financial stake in the article having a wikipedia page deal with it. Spartaz Humbug! 14:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Eye Level Learning
I am the PR and Marketing Associate for E.nopi which is now Eye Level. Can we have the E.nopi page link to the (should be) undeleted Eye Level Learning Page. It is very confusing for our customers. Please contact me at (Redacted) for any questions and concerns. -Eyelevelhub (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have moved E.nopi to your new name. What you did is called a cut and paste move. The article should have been renamed instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Lasere cuantice în cascadă
I need the entire formatting of the article in order to post it on http://ro.wikipedia.org/ instead of http://en.wikipedia.org/; the article was originally deleted because it was translated from English to Romanian and posted on English Wiki, which leaded to a foreign-language speedy deletion. Thank you in advance! -Rădulescu Flavius (talk) 19:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. I have emailed you a copy of the wikitext. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Órbita Bicycles
On this wiki there's a description with references from one of the very few successful, certified and quality bicycle manufacturers that is not made in China (like all other 99% of bicycle manufacturers) that is available and mostly unknown to many bicycle riders in the U.S. and worldwide; no copyrights or policies violations have been intended when writing this content if corrections must be made I request help, since my expertise and time are limited. The Proposed deletion of Órbita Bicycles was in effect when I have made some changes to cover it's faults by adding references and it's verifiable information at this time a Speedy deletion nomination of User:SamNos was present and with no real credentials for it to be taken... Please review my Órbita Bicycles page and provide me help on how to inform people about a 42 year old reputable bicycle manufacturer. -Nosimo (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌ I think this request has been ignored because the deleted article looked promotional. And you also asked for help. The topic may be notable, but the article has to be written in a way that does not make the bicycles and manufacturer sound great. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Kernow Positive Support
I wish to use it for reference -Rankersbo (talk) 08:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. I have returned it to AfC at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kernow Positive Support in the version before it was moved to mainspace. Plese check with the deleting admin,, before moving it to mainspace again. I now see from his note on your talk page that it contains possible copyvio: please remove or rewrite that ASAP. JohnCD (talk) 12:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Ezzat
reasoning -Alaa Hany (talk) 16:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page is a copyright violation. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Fie:Titanic (1953).jpg
It came from the Italian Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manvs.Food (talk • contribs) 16:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * This is a derivative image (screenshot of a file) and the license is with the original rights holder for the film. A PD tag is therefore incorrect and this is a non-free image being used incorrectly with no FUR. Sorry but this can't be undeleted. Spartaz Humbug! 17:42, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You uploaded it as "Public domain", but being on Italian Wikipedia does not make it PD, and from the notices at it:File:Titanic_(1953).jpg it evidently is not. If it is to be used here, you must supply a Non-free use rationale to show that it complies with WP:NFCC. JohnCD (talk) 17:44, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

List of Degrassi episodes (disambiguation)
There are three Degrassi series, things like Degrassi (season 1) need to go to a disambiguation page. This page was deleted without discussion as "uncontroversial maintenance". -117Avenue (talk) 06:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Well I can't see why List of Degrassi episodes is not the right place for this as there are no links to List of Degrassi episodes (disambiguation). However if you dispute it it does sound controversial. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I disagree, I don't think there is a primary topic of Degrassi (season 1). 117Avenue (talk) 02:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Why hasn't this been undeleted yet? 117Avenue (talk) 02:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌ Because no one thinks it is worth restoring. The content you wrote has this:

List of Degrassi episodes is a list of episodes of Degrassi Junior High and Degrassi High episodes. List of Degrassi episodes may also refer to: * List of Degrassi: The Next Generation episodes


 * The Deletion reason includes: orphan dab whose navigation function is served by a hatnote on the base name article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That is not the complete contents of the page, and it is a orphan because the links were removed so that is could be deleted. If you would like more information on why the page was created, we can discuss it on its talk, or a proper deletion discussion. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saltstick
I, Louisrb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Louisrb (talk) 00:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 07:58, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Love Matters (media)
I, Tariniti, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I´ve tried many times to have the Love Matters page approved but never succeed. Recently, the sexual education project Love Matters expanded to four more countries and won 2 awards which are relevant criteria for wiki approval. I am right now creating a new text with these facts and it will be posted within two weeks. Please bring back the Love Matters page. -Tariniti (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Add more references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources and then re-submit. JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Spencer's Magic Meatball
can you userify the page that was speedily deleted? -DDreth 11:42, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done see User:DDreth/Spencer's Magic Meatball Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:40, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Dnipro Kherson and 8 other hockey teams
Contested PRODs. - Hockeyben (talk - contribs) 17:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * All Yes check.svg Done - as contested proposed deletions, the articles have been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed them, and who may choose to nominate some or all of them at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 19:52, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The problem was that these were amateur / semi-pro teams, and did not quality for notability. They also lacked sources... I'll probably nominate them again--Львівське (говорити) 20:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

King Felix (musical group)
i was still gathering information and official archives for king felix since it was relisted on june 14. since the relist date only occurred less than seven days ago I feel i did not have adequate time to gather the proper information for the King Felix (musical group) before the page was deleted. -Iwoulddawforyou (talk) 23:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/King Felix (musical group), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 09:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Curtis Paradis
If We Work Together, We Can Make It Not Meet Any Speedy Deletion Guildlines! -TylerJamesMackey (talk) 23:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. No, actually, if the subject doesn't meet Wikipedia's WP:Notability standard, we can't. This has now been created so many times that it has been protected from creation. I will give you advice on your talk page within a day or two about what you can do next, but in the meantime read WP:Your first article and WP:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

The Sammus Theory
Would like page userfied -Jax 0677 (talk) 01:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. As this was a recent AfD, I would rather you asked the closing admin, . You will need to convince him that you actually intend to develop this, and you will need his OK before resubmitting it, anyway. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ...and ✅ by Lankiveil. Thanks. JohnCD (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

User:Jax 0677/Back From Ashes
Would like page emailed to me for my archives -Jax 0677 (talk) 01:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. I now see that the MfD covered four more similar pages which, as closing admin, I should have deleted too. I will email those to you as well. JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

User:Jax 0677/Two Dollar Grey
Would like page emailed to me for my archives -Jax 0677 (talk) 01:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 10:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

geoinfosys
This is a social entrepreneurial initiative to provide opportunities for people -GiGbGd (talk) 04:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. That may be, but see Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. What you wrote did not give the references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources necessary to establish WP:Notability, and it was written as an announcement from the company ("Please express your interest by contacting us... ") in extremely promotional terms: "professionals with dedication, determination, discipline and perseverance... applying creative and innovative concepts to develop solutions... " That is not an encyclopedia article, it is an advertisement. JohnCD (talk) 11:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Anno Domini Beats
Editor believed the page was created by a representative of the company itself. This is not the case and the page was in fact edited by several different authors including myself, none of which are representatives of the company. Article was also tidied up and links reviewed a day before deletion. Editors did not bother checking this. -86.135.244.19 (talk) 07:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Anno Domini Beats, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.


 * Being written by someone with a COI is not directly a reason for deletion, but it means that the evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources required for WP:Notability is checked carefully, and that is what was lacking. The only changes made the day before deletion were tidying up by a "bot" and would not have affected the outcome. JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Alen Stepanjan
Article should be undeleted because athlete continues playing in professional football league -195.96.78.11 (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add a reference to show that he has played in a fully professional league as defined in this list. JohnCD (talk) 12:47, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gateway Arts District
I, Crazyartsyguy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Crazyartsyguy (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

New York Fashion Shows
I don't think that the article should have been deleted due to the faults it was accused of. It was not promoting anything nor was there no indication of importance. I was trying to research the company and looked to Wikipedia as a source. The program bounced me out of the page while I was still reading which I thought was very annoying. The Wiki page was informative and to me, didn't try to promote or sell anything, there was just information on the company itself. I did not see anything about a person nor organization on their page. -Tchris8d (talk) 01:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done The entire article is about an organization. Crap language like, "The company’s Live Fashion Shows incorporate the Fashion Week Experience through a high impact presentation, spectacular runway, musical direction, and upscale designs" has no place in an encyclopedia, even if the illiterate and irregular capitalization were to be fixed. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  01:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Nik Stamps
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (I am Nicholas Walker Stamps, I am related to the Stamps family which has a page on wiki already. I am myself, Nik Stamps/Nicholas W. Stamps and I have achieved a level of fame and success in the online viral world and established myself in the local community in Philadelphia with my work/art. Here is the link to my family's history on Wiki. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stamps_family I would also like to submit my YouTube Channel for approval as it displays my best work. I create and direct films. I have posted 40 unique films from music videos, fashion film, comedies and documentaires on the local history in Philadelphia where I live. Here is my channel. http://www.youtube.com/user/StampsPixDotCom Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. I will also include my email and facebook page and my Photography page on face book below. Thank you kindly! I hope you approve the creation of a Nik Stamps entry. https://www.facebook.com/StampsLamps https://www.facebook.com/nik.stamps ) --Nik.Stamps (talk) 09:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC) -Nik.Stamps (talk) 10:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  Facebook and youtube?  Wow.  Try reviewing WP:COI and WP:GNG (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 16:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Accelerated Technology Laboratories, Inc.
It is a legitimate company and should be included in Wikipedia. If something should be changed please don't hesitate to message me. -Atlincsales (talk) 18:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Article was A7ed, re-created by a separate account and deleted again. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Article was G11'd and G11/G12'd prior that to for a copyvio of http://www.atlab.com/index.php/about/about-atl. It should be noted that the contributor's username has also been reported to WP:UAA as a WP:CORPNAME, and has a clear WP:COI. --Drm310 (talk) 21:16, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Micro Tech Global Foundation (2nd submission)
I found two drafts, intending to request deletion of one and improve the other, but I accidentally put the deletion template on the wrong one. I would like to fix it up if I could have it back. I have a copy of the text, but since it was not mine to start with the edit history would be nice to have back. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 20:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Darkness Shines/Pogroms
For History merge with Talk:Anti-Muslim violence in India. User:Darkness Shines copy pasted the content of the talk for avoiding the word "Pogroms". This can be a fair argument for the article since it contains only his inputs but this is no reason to copy paste the content of the talk page. - The Legend   of Zorro  17:33, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note-I am requesting History merge of talk page only, not the actual page. The Legend   of Zorro  10:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * So far I have restored User talk:Darkness Shines/Anti-Muslim Violence in India which seems to contain the talk you want, but I have failed to be able to history merge with a move, perhaps the title blacklist is affecting this so I cannot do it. Perhaps some other admin can do the next step! A cut and paste move may be acceptable as I expect everyone has signed their comments. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Michael S. Kearns
Mr. Kearns is indeed a very important person in the world of military sky diving. This page is a work in progress, and I have devoted a great deal of time to research Mr. Kearns and his accomplishments, and I do not believe it was fairly deleted. He is important, his accomplishments are important, and I would like this page to remain active and available for editing. Thank you. -KTB86 (talk) 22:45, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Articles for deletion/Michael S. Kearns, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  01:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

As I am semi-new to the workings of Wiki, how to I contact the administrator? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KTB86 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you click on the word "talk" after her name in, you will get to her talk page. You can add a new message for her by clicking on "New section" at the top, and filling in a heading and your message on the form that appears. Please sign your message by ending it with a group of four "tilde" signs  which will tell her who you are by adding a "signature" of your username and the time and date, like this: JohnCD (talk) 22:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Amyra Dastur
improvement -Amogh0990 (talk) 12:19, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. This has now been deleted 3 times - the most recent time because you, yourself, requested deletion by blanking the contents.  The "actress" is not sufficiently notable as of yet (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 12:31, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Firth Cleveland
No chance to contest A7 category or improve article before deletion. Note: this user already has at least one complaint on his talk page for multiple speedy deletions, no history of article creation and only four months experience of WP Keomike (talk) 18:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC) -Keomike (talk) 18:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done history restored, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Firth_Cleveland&action=history but please consider if the content should go where the redirect points.  Myself I think the original topic had a claim of importance but insufficient content to stand alone from Charles William Hayward. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)