Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 95

Ron Leejack
Important side bar information relating to former members of and early development of the internationally ubiquitous Heavy Metal Band KISS -71.197.179.197 (talk) 01:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Lectonar (talk) 08:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Sam Ward (actor)
reasoning -Samuel0102 (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2013 (UTC) References were cited, page should not have been deleted.
 * Besides being a copyright infringement, this person does not appear to meet the notability requirements, and since IMDB is user-editable, it cannot be used to justify biographies (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 14:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

ZDROWIE Direct
Page has been deleted despite the America's equivalent eHealthInsurance is in wikipedia.

I added some reasons to leave it here on the talk page. But no one answer me.

Zdrowie Direct has built a pioneering Internet technology that customers can get health insurance entirely via the Internet. It is for the first time in Poland.

It created his own Approval internet system which can approve applications during one online session. It is the first online marketplace in Poland, next to the eHealthInsurance in United States, where customers can get health insurance entirely via the Internet and compare various plans of major insurance companies. -Registrar88 (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;  Talk  20:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Hal and Sidra Stone
They are world known specialists -Jaceknow (talk) 23:34, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. All of the article's sources are primary, the Stones' own website and writings. In order to establish WP:Notability, it needs references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 14:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Erich Schelling ‎
Would a kind administrator please move this article to my userspace? It was deleted because it contains content in Spanish. I will remove that portion of the article. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ (German, actually) to User:Candleabracadabra/Erich Schelling. Check out WP:Translation and note that if you translate from an other-language-WP you need to use Translated page on the talk page to give attribution . JohnCD (talk) 14:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Miguel Angel Builes‎
Would a kind administrator please move this article to my userspace? It was deleted because it contains content in Spanish. I will remove that portion of the article. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ to User:Candleabracadabra/Miguel Angel Builes. I have commented out the categories while it is in user space. JohnCD (talk) 14:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Arturo Robledo Ocampo ‎
Would a kind administrator please move this article to my userspace? It was deleted because it contains content in Spanish. I will remove that portion of the article. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ to User:Candleabracadabra/Arturo Robledo Ocampo. This one still has some Spanish Categorías. JohnCD (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

file:kim possible 09.jpg
This must be resurrected. I will add the link to this deleted file into Kim Possible (character). -George Ho (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✔️ by Orangemike. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

ZippyChatter.com
It Is My Web Article Not Copyright And I Removed Link Of My Web From Article -EpaCco (talk) 18:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information.  If you're related to the website, note that such spamming may lead to a block (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 23:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Dzidzio
Please, undelete the page about the Ukrainian band Dzidzio. This is one of the most popular bands in Ukraine, and with many followers in Internet. As well, the information in the deleted page was obtained from the the group's website (www.dzidzio.com) and from the Ukrainian version of Wikipedia (http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B7%D1%96%D0%B4%D0%B7%D1%8C%D0%BE_%28%D0%B3%D1%83%D1%80%D1%82%29). I wish the article will be undeleted

Thank you. -Fjgalindo (talk) 05:57, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.  Note also that the notability standards on the Ukranian Wikipedia are nowhere near as strict as that for the English Wikipedia (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 10:34, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Matt Kalinski
This page is needed -Mattedia (talk) 06:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles_for_deletion/Matt_Kalinski_(2nd_nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 10:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

shopame
i'm a fan who would like to share info about the product with others. what happened to the page? why is it blocked? -Victoria388 (talk) 09:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines.  Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information. (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 10:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

TES India
No opportunity was given to allow any changes to be made to the TES India page. TES India is a website and represents the teaching community of India by supplying free teaching resources and lesson plans for teachers to download at no charge. I would have happily addressed any issues the Wiki user Lesser Cartographies had. No opportunity was give to amend the page. I request suggestions for improvement of the page and reinstatement of the Wiki entry. -78.146.224.62 (talk) 14:03, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Oh, and see this. Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Smith Hall (Georgia Tech)
Please restore this article so we may merge this information with Georgia Tech main campus article per this discussion Thanks -Mistercontributer (talk) 22:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Caldwell Hall (Georgia Tech)
Please restore this article so we may merge this information with Georgia Tech main campus article per this discussion Thanks -Mistercontributer (talk) 22:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Brown Hall (Georgia Tech)
Please restore this article so we may merge this information with Georgia Tech main campus article per this discussion Thanks -Mistercontributer (talk) 22:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Harrison Hall (Georgia Tech)
Please restore this article so we may merge this information with Georgia Tech main campus article per this discussion Thanks -Mistercontributer (talk) 22:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Immaculate Conception Of Saint Joseph
reasoning -Albin013 (talk) 05:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC) This page contains valid data
 * article was de-PRODded by IP editor, was never deleted — rybec   05:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done for bot archiving. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

WECAN SOCIETY
reasoning -Tombhaduri (talk) 07:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. The advertising language in the article put aside, it also seems to be a copyvio. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Musashigawa stable (2013)
I lost the material I wrote, and want to use it in either other established articles, or to add material to make it more notable. FourTildes (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ Restored to user:FourTildes/sandbox 6. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:56, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Zipwhip
This is a legitimate article about the company Zipwhip (www.zipwhip.com) that was deleted due to the sockpuppet investigation. While the page was created by one of the banned accounts, it has been edited and refined since then. Please restore it. -108.16.27.23 (talk) 19:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Hmm, apart from the banned user creating it, we had some edits of an editor with a very probably Conflict of interest, and some weeding out of the puffery stuff, some categorization...all in all, I'd say deletion review should be the way forward here; undeletion would not be uncontroversial. Lectonar (talk) 08:05, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Link2city
I, 50.198.245.157, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 50.198.245.157 (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done The draft could have been deleted as a G11 (advertisement) easily, as it was extremely promotional. If another admin wishes to restore nonetheless, feel free. Lectonar (talk) 08:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Andy Pandini
After five years, much more notable -84.39.116.180 (talk) 03:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Andy Pandini, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. And you would have to present the reliable sources to sustain your assumption of him being more notable. Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

(no title supplied)
 MichaelLeeStever (talk) 05:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌ user has no contributions to undelete, but please let us know the article if there is one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I just think it might actually be the one above: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saturday Nightmares: The Ultimate Horror Expo Of All Time!, only a bit malformed. In the history of that AfC, we have user Michaellee4, which is near enough as usernames go to just think he might be the same editor as the requester above. Lectonar (talk) 09:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Saturday_Nightmares:_The_Ultimate_Horror_Expo_Of_All_Time!&action=edit&redlink=1

 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

PME Power Solutions
Still building the page and aiming to provide significant information regarding transformer manufacturing and engineering, procurement and construction measures applied to power substations worldwide -Nehapuri2304 (talk) 11:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done but improve this quickly as there is no text here yet! I have placed a prod on it that you are free to remove. But if you do nothing this will get the chop. If you are going to be slow, then a sandbox is a good idea. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

List of Gullah Gullah Island episodes
Invalid R3 (Speedy deletion was declined appropriately in 2011) -76.110.65.48 (talk) 18:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done I don't think that what you say is true, however we need it for attribution of the target. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Cross Enterprise Document Sharing
very little discussion at delete time - I now wish to improve it -Medconn (talk) 23:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC) This is a significant means of sharing medical information which has been slow to catch on the US (though meaningful use regs are now pushing it) but it is widely used in large parts of Europe, Australasia and Africa, with use in hundreds of hospitals and many thousands of people working on implementations. I see that only 2-3 people contributed to the delete discussion (none of them names I know, and one frankly wrong in his dismissiveness - probably looking from a US perspective). OK - it might need some improvement/better references, but I'd prefer to start from an existing page than from scratch!
 * X mark.svg Not done The page has been userfied and can now be found here: User:Medconn/Cross Enterprise Document Sharing. Lectonar (talk) 07:52, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Gene_D._Matlock
Quiet popular author, supported by multiple reliable sources. -Capitals00 (talk) 03:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Atul Punj Page restoration.
Person is holding chairmanship and MD position in $2.4 Billion company and well known Industrialist in India. With other detail about him, page must be restore. Administrators are kindly request to restore Atul Punj page. -Gokulchandola (talk) 05:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. If it is as you say, finding reliable sources should be no problem. Lectonar (talk) 07:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, these are reliable sources. Also there is no advertisement or promotion. --Gokulchandola (talk) 04:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Wisreed
reasoning -Plamen Grozdanov (talk) 13:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Information for the reader
The article on WisReed was written by me and several months later deleted (under "speedy deletion" policy), because it allegedly appeared to be an advertisement of a single company. This is a misunderstanding, because the text had no praise, endorsement or any other improper qualifications on WisReed (if anything, I was and am critical of this half-baked communications protocol). The following is justification why the article on Wisreed should not have been deleted and ought to be restored.

1) Statement of personal involvement or personal interests
I have  no  personal involvement or indeed  any  involvement with WisReed or Fujitsu (who allegedly have created it),  nor  do I have any personal interest (such as even the slightest benefit) in Fujitsu, its products and in particular WisReed.

2) History
Last year I was investigating the technologies and the communications protocols suitable for [Smart Metering]. Someone (a non-technical person) had suggested and claimed that WisReed were a major candidate for such a protocol and its implementation in UK was imminent and planned by a competitor to the company in which I am working. However there was something not right in this claim -- having spent my life in telecommunications, I had not heard of WisReed at all so it was quite improbable that it were in competition with all main-stream communications technologies for Smart Metering. Consequently, I set at finding out what WisReed was. Hardly to any surprise, I found that it was just a half-baked concept, which had Fujitsu as a proponent making grand, but not yet substantiated claims. My research found that WisReed was not as good as it was touted to be and far from the panacea for M2M (machine-to-machnine) communications that our competitors were alleging. And it certainly was not in competition with the main-stream technologies for Smart Metering in UK, and above all it had no chances of being approved by DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change in UK) for deployment in the UK Smart Metering Network.

Having spent time on investigating this rudimentary and yet-unproven communications protocol, I decided as a public service to write a short article in Wikipedia so that others could find quicker what it was about (Wikipedia is alsways the first port of call in all my research and I thought that this article would provide some information and dispel some of the unfounded allegations and claims about the greatness of WisReed).

3) The content of the deleted article on Wisreed
The content was written by me, I tried to be as impartial as possible, and I did not make any statements in praise of WisReed (or unsupported critique, as a matter of fact), I only included some of the allegations of the creators of WisReed but made sure that each of these statements opened with the words "Allegedly..." or "It is claimed that..." making it absolutely sure that the reader would get the correct impression that these were just unproven claims. If anything, I was trying to avoid being too critical of this half-baked protocol and its too-grand claims of being a sort of panacea to M2M. Unfortunately, since the creators of WisReed came solely from within Fujitsu (with whom I have no affiliation nor any personal interests), it appears that this fact led to Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion to be falsely triggered. Note that there was no other way how to describe WisReed in an article without making it clear that WisReed was only an attempt by a single company at a proprietary M2M protocol, and not a global de-facto standard to be imminently implemented in millions of Smart Meters in UK.

4) Why I would like the article on WisReed to be restored
I think that it would be a good thing to restore the article on WisReed because:

4.1) The text contained no praise, nor advertisement, not even an endorsement of WisReed. The same goes about Fujitsu (the text contained no praise, nor advertisement, not even an endorsement of Fujitsu).

4.2) The alleged mentioning of a single company was not for commercial promotion or advertising, it was for good reasons -- there was no other way how to describe WisReed without making it clear that it was only a proprietary communications protocol (as opposed to a an accepted de-facto standard). The text of the article pointed out that WisReed was created and developed only by Fujitsu (hence the inevitable mentioning of a single company name).

4.3) Even unproven concepts and unpromising technical ideas (such a WisReed) deserve to be described in Wikipedia, if for no other reason, than for making it a clear that WisReed was nothing else but a concept and any allegations about its grand potential must be taken with a pinch of salt until proven with facts.

Summary
I propose to restore the article on WisReed. It was not written as an advertisement, its text did not praise WisReed and even did not endorse it, its text made it clear that the claims made by the authors of WisReed were just claims and not yet proven facts. The text was written in a balanced way and it provided information to the reader, which was useful in clarifying what WisReed really was.

--Plamen Grozdanov (talk) 13:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Great heart shall not be denied. While I agree that it is not very promotional, it still is not ready for mainspace, imho. Therefore, I have userfied the article for you to work upon. It can be found here. Please have a look here to learn more about article writing; the article as it stands does not really confirm notability, and is in dire need of reliable sources. Lectonar (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Louis Barajas
Hello, I am writing to request the page Louis Barajas not be deleted from Wikipedia. The article was deleted for G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. However this page is not advertising any product or promoting the sale of anything. It is simply an article on a public person. The article is still in the process of being completed. Louis is an Author and National Public speaker, he is on national television and radio weekly. Louis is on CNN and NPR's Marketplace Money as a financial expert, along with KCAL9 News, He tours the country giving seminars and speeches to people of all different walks of life. He is known for his work in the Latino Community, he is also the first Latino in the United States to receive the Certified Financial Planner designation. He has written 5 books; The Latino Journey to Financial Greatness, My Street Money, Overworked, Overwhelmed, and Underpaid, Small Business, Big Life, and Small Business Big Life for Women. Louis has also been in national news articles with the L.A. Times, Mutual Funds magazine where he was named as one of the Top 100 Financial Advisors. He also was chosen by People en Espanol as a person making a difference in the lives of Americans. Louis being known across the nation for his books and public works should have an article in Wikipedia. I hope you take into consideration the article was still in progress and choose to undelete it. Thank you -Mystreetmoney (talk) 21:34, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Let me just quote 2 lines here: "Louis Barajas defies the traditional concept of financial and business expert. Louis connects with people through their hearts, their dreams, and the often-difficult realities of their lives." If you deem this is not advertising the subject of the article....let me be frank: this is a long way from an article worthy for inclusion here. I would advise you to read WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE, and declare openly any existing conflict of interest. Lectonar (talk) 21:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Flag of Republic of Korea.svg
no clue why it has been deleted -Paulc206 (talk) 03:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code (replacing   with the name of the page you wish to have restored and   with the reason for your request). There is no deleted content there...Lectonar (talk) 09:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Oberoi Splendor Grande
reasoning -Oberoirealty0 (talk) 05:42, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done This was pure advertising. Lectonar (talk) 09:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

jumpido
I am new to Wikipedia and tried to read all the rules before I created this page. Indeed, I agree that the page as written is not ready. I had to stand up from my computer and could not finish the article (I planned to finish it today and add more information and references. The way the references are done is quite complicated and I have troubles understanding it (my tech background is modest) but I will make sure to read and understand all the rules before I edit the page the way it is supposed to be. If I need some help I will ask the fellow Wikipedians. -Portfolio123 (talk) 07:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. You might also want to read WP:FAQ/business, and it would be positive if you could declare any conflict of interest. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Doolist
reasoning -Dave knowles (talk) 09:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done The article is pending review here. Lectonar (talk) 09:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Vida Vacations
Deleted under criteria G11 for Speedy Deletion. However the article cited several independent sources with in-depth coverage, as required by WP:CORPDEPTH, and was not written using any promotional language. I certainly don't think it deserved speedy deletion - at least a deletion discussion would have left scope for improvement of the article. If nothing else, would appreciate having the material back for another draft. -Shoreditch Lib (talk) 11:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done placed back in your sandbox User:Shoreditch Lib/sandbox. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Andrew Brott
Andrew Brott is an American Master Glass Artist and part of the Studio Glass Art Movement that came out of the University of WI- Madison. Several noted artists on your site, including Dale Chihuly came out of this Studio Glass Movement. This is not a business promotional article. If you view Dale Chihuly's articles you will also find a link to his studio website. I ran out of time to post additional references to support this article. I didn't realize someone would be all up in it and not even give me the consideration of fact checking first before deleting. I am reluctant to even continue this any further. -KellieGrengs (talk) 00:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment by deleting admin You didn't mention any of that in the encyclopedia article: instead you included material like "The UL listing is just one feature of their quality that sets them apart from inferior imports." Wikipedia does not accept advertising.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Lectonar (talk) 08:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

rooh the soul
It is the new album of bohemia the punjabi rapstar.It is released this month but its details are not provided on wikipedia.i think it should not be deleted but it should be improved. thanks. -rsinghduhan 08:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually it wasn't deleted before your request; it is now, as we have no article about the musician. For writng articles, follow the explanations given at WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE. Lectonar (talk) 08:27, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

jumpido
I am new to Wikipedia. The first time when I created the page I did not finish it and it was deleted. The person that deleted it told me that I should include reliable sources and I believe that I did that. In the article I include Bloomberg Businessweek, Capital (the most respected business newspaper in Bulgaria), Israel Gateway, Inventures, etc. Also, I was told that the article should not be considered advertising or promotion in order to stay. In the article is mentioned only the type of activity the company has. There is nothing mentioned about prices or where the office is located. Regarding the significance of the subject - I believe that a company that started couple months ago, works in 3 countries, is mentioned by Bloomberg Businessweek and other well respected media and receives investment from a fund with very rigorous selection criteria is notable to mention -Portfolio123 (talk) 08:30, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see the response a few sections back. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * And my explanations on your talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done

Dax Networks
Company is top 3 networking company in India and provide all networking solution including high end Enterprise Networking solution etc. Company is more than 25 yeas old, which is significance of notability. For article/page improvement we need to give some to public -Gokulchandola (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I suppose there would have to be a claim of importance in the article about that top 3 position along with evidence about that. Press releases and a company web site will not be sufficient citations for this to survive.  Providing those solutions is not a claim of importance itself. As for 25 years old. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Dax Networks shows importance in IT industry, especially in India. There is huge demand in Government department of Dax IT equipment's. If we review of Dax Networks products, show clear importance of company. For further clarification we can read about company from many reliable sources. (Gokulchandola (talk) 06:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC))


 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. None of the claims are apparent in the article as it was.  Perhaps you can generate a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT that is appropriate.  I also hope you do not have WP:COI (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 10:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I strongly believe to restore this page, Dax Networks. There is no WP:COI. Administrators are kindly requested to review this article for restoration. (Gokulchandola (talk) 10:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC))
 * I agree with BWilkins; a draft of the article in your userspace should be the way forward here; or you could use the process laid out at articles for creation. Lectonar (talk) 20:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * 'Dax Networks is information page and may part of Wikipedia: This is well know networking product manufacturing company. So I request to Administrators to restore this page. (117.212.120.230 (talk) 14:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC))
 * Again, a userspace draft is the way to go here. Closing. Stifle (talk) 14:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Boston Audio Society
Possibly meets WP:GNG, as publisher of the BAS Speaker and noted by numerous other sources, possibly satisfying WP:ORGDEPTH; long established organisation with international interest. If deleted content is unsuitable for mainspace, please consider this as a request for a move to User:Trevj/Boston Audio Society, where content can be edited before moving back to mainspace. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 14:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 
 * ✅ - userfied to User:Trevj/Boston Audio Society. As you can see, the deleted article does nothing to show notability, but that was five years ago and your list of refs suggests notability. Check with user, the deleting admin, before you restore it to mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 11:10, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Will do. -- Trevj (talk) 05:39, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Wolan
The article about similar company already exists. This is the article of another company http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingo24 Wolan also works fos olympic games in Sochi. It should be known around the world. -Komarych (talk) 12:59, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Note that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason for the existence of another article (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 13:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Sweet Pool
The reason this page was deleted was "Non-notable novel/game" I don't think this is true -90.224.36.36 (talk) 13:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Although an expired PROD, this was deleted over 3 years ago. The article was unsourced, showed no signs of notability, and failed WP:FIRSTARTICLE as a whole.  Due to sourcing and other issues, it cannot be undeleted (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 13:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Tagum Cooperative
reasoning -FELCEAZAR (talk) 13:59, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg This page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 14:04, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

HD 133600
Is notable, many papers e.g. http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-4357/669/2/L89/pdf/1538-4357_669_2_L89.pdf -Robert Walker (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please add the reference, and make clear that this is the same as HIP 73815; the paper does not mention HD 133600, and it took me some research to find out why it was relevant. JohnCD (talk) 18:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for undeleting it, have done that.Robert Walker (talk) 19:59, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

THUNK a cappella
this is a page dedicated to Northwestern University's premiere co-Ed a cappella group. It seems odd that other a cappella groups from the same university are allowed on Wikipedia and this one is not. Please undelete the THUNK a cappella page in due time as it is an important page to have to allow representation of Northwestern and of the Arts at NU. -Mer253 (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. And please read this. Lectonar (talk) 07:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Article restored/recreated, see above. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 01:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * In spite of it having been deleted twice, Mer253 recreated the article. --Rob Sinden (talk) 13:22, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Poly.pov
Per Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates, the justification for deletion - that it was supposedly a completely useless file - is incorrect. The file is needed to generate larger copies of the polyhedra, which will be done after undeletion. - Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done but take a copy of what you want soon, as this is not a valid file type for the Wiki, even if it is useful. Graeme Bartlett (talk)

international fighting spirit week and international high spirit week
Dear PeridonI had created two pages..one was about a cause and to create awareness about that cause and you deleted it. Could you please let me know why and if there was an issue why wasn't I given a chance to rectify it?Considering that day is just around the corner and awareness is important. I did mention in the article that more details would be added ...I would request you to restore the page and please let ne know the issue so that I can resolve it along with modifications.My second page simply had one word as draft (again set aside for modifications) as I was going to write that after I completed my previous one and that page had been deleted too without giving me a chance.I have seen so many pages on Wikipedia where people have written single sentence and never modified them.I don't say that I intend to do so but please restore my pages and especially the content so that I can work on them asap especially because dates are very close for the cause I am writing for.Looking forward to positive reply soonRegards -Hiepoonam (talk) 06:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Answered at my talk page. There are four ghits for "International Fighting Spirit Week" - all Wikipedia or a mirror. (There are only two WP and a mirror for the Day...) Peridon (talk) 10:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Lectonar (talk) 09:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Sadaqah the Android App
I believe some of the sentences are similar to my previous article from another site of mine, But I am not doing the copy pasting for sure. If you want I can rewrite the Article. But, I would request to not delete this Article from Wikipedia. -Sifatedhardy (talk) 19:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Lectonar (talk) 09:23, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Phat Ravis
Hello, I would like my article to be undeleted, if that is possible. Many of my fans have been asking me if I had a Wikipedia page, I made one and it gets deleted. -Music317 (talk) 06:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Oh, and please read this Lectonar (talk) 09:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Softacom Ltd.
This page is really important to people who want to know about CRM and IT-companies in Belarus -Adyak (talk) 10:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Lectonar (talk) 09:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson
I would like to improve the page so that it does not seem like promotion/advertising -64.132.107.3 (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I have left a note with the deleting admin. Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * After talking to the deleting admin: Yes check.svg Done. But this needs a lot of work, and it would be advisable that whomever works at this declare any conflict of interest. Lectonar (talk) 11:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

United Students Against Sweatshops
Subject is notable. Old content should be improved, not deleted. -12.4.233.1 (talk) 22:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Work it needs, though. Lectonar (talk) 09:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Matmon Internet, Inc.
I didn't even have enough time to build the page out before someone nominated it for speedy deletion. I would at least like the chance to put in the information to show relevancy before being moved to speedy deletion. -Elliottgbrown (talk) 02:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Lectonar (talk) 09:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Per this discussion, I think it would be helpful to userfy the content until it's ready. -- Trevj (talk) 10:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Userfied at User:Elliottgbrown/Matmon Internet, Inc., thanks. Lectonar (talk) 10:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Rapid Hire Centres Limited
Please can you not delete my article, I do feel it is important, showing the history of the company over the years and it's formation. I do appreciate that the article in it's present state could do with more work and maybe more references to the subject of tool hire as a business. -Kirk H Stansfield (talk) 10:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

I think the article was deleted because, all it looked to be saying was about the company only, and may not be of great interest in it's present state. I would appreciate any help or advice, so that I can structure the article better, thus giving it a more interesting read. Can I get the article back to work on?

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  15:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

THUNK a cappella
reasoning -Mer253 (talk) 14:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Despite the fact that this article has been deleted several times, I am contesting its deletion once more. As a multimedia and fine arts producer from Northwestern, THUNK a cappella is mentioned in the Northwestern University Wikipedia page, as well as many other a cappella wikipedia pages. I am asking for undeletion of this article because it is a representation of Northwestern University and collegiate a cappella across America. Additionally, more references can be added to object this article from speedy deletion. I would also like to edit it so that it doesn't seem like promotion or advertising. Please undelete this article so I can continue to edit. Thank you very much.
 * Have a read of WP:BAND. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done and will not be done You requested this to be undeleted on 16-Jul (still above, at this moment) and were told flat-out why it could not be undeleted and should not be undeleted. You then re-created it in a format contrary to the advice you were given.  This article will NOT be undeleted, and please consider yourself appropriately warned against promotional editing and creating inappropriate articles (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 14:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I find it very rude that you think I have created inappropriate articles, and/or been filed for the use of promotional editing. I recreated the article WITH the advice you gave me, and unfortunately, your rudeness has failed to notice that. Additionally, BWilkins, Wikipedia is supposed to be kind and welcoming to new users, and you failed to do so. Mer253 (talk) 15:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, then I suppose we're equal. You've had at least 8 people tell you that you're creating an inappropriate article, and yet I'm the one you take your anger out on.  No - you did not follow the advice that was given to you by anyone.  You have continued to (with likely conflict of interest write a live article about a group that fails our strict notability guidelines - these guidelines are not optional.  I honestly believe that after the first attempt of assisting you was unsuccessful, you were no longer "new", and are now either willfully ignoring the advice given by others, or somehow believe that other admins would allow this through.  Sorry if you consider this rude, but it's also rude to not listen to advice in this community environment (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 18:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * BWilkins, I must apologize to you for displaying anger; it was not my intention; however, I must disagree with you on some aspects of your comment. I would not say I had 8 people tell me anything. When I first created this article, it was almost deleted instantaneously before even allowing me to edit it. Secondly, I was not given any advice. I was given a notice of speedy deletion, which I read over dozen of times, ultimately coming to the conclusion that I did not know what to fix in order to remove that speedy deletion tag. Thirdly, not one person even tried to assist me. They just went right in and deleted the article. If this is truly a community environment that you speak of, you shouldn't speedily erase people's work that is truly credible and associated with multiple other articles found on this very encyclopedia. I am VERY open minded and willing to listen to you and your advice, yet, you didn't really give me any. Again, I apologize for any inconvenience or harsh statements I made, but keep in mind that I still am a "new" user on here, so it would be nice to receive some help rather than just deleting my article. If you could merely undelete this article, as well as give me advice on my talk page of how to fix the article, I am more than happy to listen. I do, however, feel that this article is credible and important. If you disagree, then please let us discuss this. Also, this article is within the Wikiproject Chicago, serving as useful information to improve the coverage of the Chicago area on Wikipedia. Please notify me if that serves as useful information in the undeletion of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mer253 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The article will not be undeleted into articlespace - if could be userfied if needed, but since you seem to have been able to re-create it for the fourth time already, then there should be no need for that. Part of your problem: your account has been renamed - you should no longer be logging in as User:Mer253. You may recreate the article either in your WP:SANDBOX or use the articles for creation process, however, once an article is deleted through WP:CSD you may never simply recreate it - which you have unfortunately done more than once. Please read WP:FIRSTARTICLE before trying to recreate it in your sandbox, and please do not make further comments in this thread - the article will NOT be undeleted, as you have already been advised. The people who told you it would not be undeleted have ALL given you links to what was wrong and how to fix it (both here, and on your talkpage) ... you've simply not paid attention to/visited those links. If you want the most recent version moved into userspace, let me know on my talkpage - as this is not a forum for further discussion. Do not attempt to recreate this article in articlespace (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 19:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Jeffrey Gurian
reasoning -JeffreyGurianwiki (talk) 17:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this page is a copyright violation. And just in case you are the copyright-holder: there are links on your talk-page how to proceed. Be aware, though, that just releasing the copyrighht does not necessarily mean there will be an article. And please read this. Lectonar (talk) 17:23, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

ACE College of Engineering
This is about a genuine educational institution where about 300 students are studying for 4 year Engineering degree course. I don't know much abou AfD, but when I had given resoning to moderators who tagged it for AfD, they removed the entries from talk page, which I thought was affirmative. Please guide me how to reccreate/undelete the article. I can provide more reliable references if required. -Afzal (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/ACE College of Engineering, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 18:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Dominic Angerame
reasoning -Dangerame (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Source: http://lightcone.org/en/filmmaker-6-dominic-angerame
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Appears to be an autobiography AND copyright violation. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;  Talk  20:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)