Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 96

Pneumatic line thrower
Deleted by prod on grounds it is unsourced. I see no reason that this should not have an article. It is a common piece of maritime hardware. After a quick check for sources, I don't think that I would be able to source all of this article, or even most of it, from free online sources, but there is enough out there to show at least that it is notable. - Spinning Spark  19:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Virginia Society for Human Life
Page seems to have been deleted arbitrarily by user with an "anti-anti-abortion agenda" (page blanking? -Badmintonhist (talk) 06:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Page has not been deleted, but redirected. And no, there is not always an agenda....why do so many people think so? Anyway, the right venue is redirects for discussion. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

MatrixSSL
a quick search found refs [www.ietf.org/proceedings/67/slides/tls-3/tls-3.ppt‎] -  Widefox ; talk 07:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Lectonar (talk) 08:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Flock Associates
For my own personal file -LibertyS91 (talk) 09:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * There has never (thankfully) been such an article. You attempted to promote that business via your userpage, but it was rightly deleted.  You may not promote an entity that you are involved with.  I might be willing to e-mail the content to you, but such promotion cannot be undeleted.  I see you approached the deleting admin after creating this request (they should have been your first stop), so I will allow that conversation to continue at this point (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 10:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Submissions/Alim Kamara
I, 90.202.214.60, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 90.202.214.60 (talk) 17:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Actually, this should have been deleted as a G11 years ago; the submission sat virtually untocuhed for almost 5 years. I will give you a quote: "A truly powerful wordsmith, his written expressions paint profound, vivid imagery for his listeners.Humble yet blazing with fiery passion, Alim AKA the seeking scholar is set to blow up the UK RAP scene." Lectonar (talk) 18:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

irv da phenom
This is a professional recording artists wikipedia used frequently & was deleted for no reason. -2605:E000:1414:35:54A4:85D9:A9A2:32E0 (talk) 18:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code (replacing   with the name of the page you wish to have restored and   with the reason for your request). Lectonar (talk) 18:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Alex (software)
reasoning -JoeOfTheWiki (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

When any programmer decides he wants to add a custom parser and lexer to an application implemented in Haskell, Alex & Happy used together will often be his first considered option. The following pages refer to it: Haskell Platform, Comparison of parser generators, Happy (software) and I was about to add it to Lexical analysis when I decided to request undeletion.
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. But the article needs work to come up to scratch. I'd say do not wait to long. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

StarMade
Somebody traced down all of my pages and deleted them after I was trying to write a page about a very popular game. -RookeryPhysics (talk) 00:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done As you have been told on your talk-page, this was not notable and borderline spam; I also suspect a conflict of interest. Please read WP:FAQ/business. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Ashley Sutton
article was deleted under a7 however reference verification can be found at http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3748314/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 -LisaAnnUF (talk) 03:47, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. IMDb's content is user-submitted and therefore not generally reliable as a source. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Ashley Sutton
please reinstate the page here are verification references: will this work? http://jacksonville.com/interact/blog/mac_mcdonald/2010-03-17/macinations_newsletter_for_wednesday_31710 and http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3748314/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 -LisaAnnUF (talk) 11:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done See above; I think Ms. Sutton is not notable enough for Wikipedia at the moment. This may change in the future, though. Lectonar (talk) 11:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Carpal Tunnel Review
This was a wiki page for a site that I constructed as a help guide for people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in helping them find a treatment option aside from surgery, the option most people with CTS jump at without looking at their other options first. It is a medical health site. -JohnDRhoads (talk) 16:08, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately your site does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and it is not Wikipedia's role to advertise or drive additional traffic to your site (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 16:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

INVEST Financial Corporation
I have reformatted the previous article so that it will not be an advertisement. Posting it as early as I did was a mistake; I didn't realize that when I saved the article, it would automatically be available for everyone to see. Thank you. -CPeffley (talk) 17:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Yes, and it still is at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Invest Financial Corporation; you should wait for the evaluation. At first glance: I still do not see the notability of this corporation. Lectonar (talk) 18:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Brendan Gallagher
Article has been re-created. Please restore edit history. -Dolovis (talk) 21:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done There are no useful revisions, only copyright violations, redirects or nominations to delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Rebaked
article is written without advertising language to inform, using facts -Calliedoodle (talk) 04:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have restored Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rebaked, but it probably does not pass the WP:CORP criteria as well. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Suicide Squeeze Records
Meets the WP:MUSIC definition of "an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are notable". Artists get plenty of media coverage. -Chubbles (talk) 17:00, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Well, more sources need to be added asap. Lectonar (talk) 18:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Could I also ask for restoration of the redirect We Ragazzi? I am curious to know if there is salvageable content for an article in that redirect's edit history. Chubbles (talk) 01:54, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It was only the redirect, nothing else......Lectonar (talk) 07:19, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, and done now...Lectonar (talk) 09:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

ROBODOC
reasoning -Nnetravali (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

I received a message saying that there may be a conflict of interest, which is true. However, I don't believe there was any copyright infringement and would still like to edit the page based on what I had previously submitted.


 * X mark.svg Not done The page was a copyright infringement of this page, which is not explicitly public domain. It therefore cannot be used anywhere on Wikipedia.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Canary (dance)
I protested the deletion proposal immediately a couple of minutes later as per procedure yet the article including my protest was still deleted afterwards. All within a time span of 18 minutes! -LazyStarryNights (talk) 20:30, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * This is the subject of a merger proposal; since the proposal is still under discussion, it was inappropriate to start the article as if the discussion was over. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I was the one that did the merger proposal. I created the page to be able to put the merger discussion into the talk section of that page. Thus the deletion deleted the merger discussion. I luckily created a backup and moved the discussion to my sandbox, but I cannot imagine that is how it is supposed to work. What went wrong in the process? I tried to follow the merger guideline from which I understood the best place is to add the discussion on the proposed target page. I raised this in my protest against deletion on the same talk page that was deleted. LazyStarryNights (talk) 22:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The procedure is predicated on the assumption that you are proposing merger into an article that already exists, not into a brand new article. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  01:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks for clarifying. So is there a different procedure described which should be used instead or do you think the existing procedure should be refined? I still do not have a clue on how to do this properly. LazyStarryNights (talk) 06:41, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I copied the merger proposal talk to one of the source pages (Canarie (dance)) as per Wikipedia talk:Merging. Thanks to Flatscan for pointing out this procedure in the footnotes of Help:Merging and Merging. LazyStarryNights (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Tony Lee (actor)
I disagree with the prod's contention that Lee only had "a few bits". He had an important guest role in three episodes of Lost and guest starred in several other notable series: ER, Without a Trace, West Wing, JAG, Monk. Here's the IMDB page. 207.118.90.154 (talk) 04:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Dos y Dos
Deleted at a WP:NOQUORUM discussion, now needed to proceed at Article Incubator/Greenhouse -Unscintillating (talk) 12:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ so you have a few months to make use of content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

THE REVIVAL INFO
under submission process while only preferences were named to be upgraded suddenly it was deleted for saying it is a promotion while truly it is informational -Chris Springer 14:54, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌ This has not been deleted see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Revival Info. THis took me a while to find and your user: User:Wikipedinfo! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:50, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Tabernacle of Faith International


Tabernacle of Faith International or TFI is a well-known church in the country. It held the same status such as JIL and VCF achieved.

Also, regarding with its past issues, the article will be watched (by me) and will remain neutral. It will not be biased towards church or Pentecostalism (or Protestantism for that matter) but will only tell published facts, mostly from sources published on the web. -PH 0447 (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Tabernacle of Faith International, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user . After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Khajji Cooperative Society
Good Evening Sir, I have mistakenly create the page on my personal ID, so that I have called my friend to make an other ID for the article to be published on your site, So if you have any doubt on my friends ID and my ID you can visit to our Organization's site http://www.kcs.org.pk hope you will be satisfied form my comments -KCSKhairpur (talk) 17:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:04, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The same ❌ applies to Khajji Cooperative society Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

TIPAN USA, ANGKAN NG MGA VENERACION
reasoning -Drxgonzales (talk) 20:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

My article was deleted with the following information: 09:29, 25 July 2013 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page TIPAN USA, ANGKAN NG MGA VENERACION (A1: Not enough context to identify article's subject)

I am a new contributor to Wikepedia and still learning your language, rules, etc. Please accept my apology is I fall short of your expectations. My article TIPAN USA, ANGKAN NG MGA VENERACION is under construction, hence there is still not enough context to identify article's subject. I would like to continue developing it according to your standards. This is about the history, legacy, etc. of the Veneracion Clan that started in the 17th century in the Philippines. The clan is now spread all over the world with more concentration in the Philippines and the USA. Please advice on how I can do this without being deleted. Thanks.Drxgonzales (talk) 20:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Drxgonzales
 * Unfortunately, we cannot let you experiment in live article space. You're welcome to try and work in your personal WP:SANDBOX, and there's not a significant amount of information to undelete and copy to your sandbox.  Note, however, if you are involved in the organization you may not write about them due to conflict of interest.  Not all organizations are WP:NOTABLE, and it's highly probable that yours is not.  Please review our Manual of Style for any future edits (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 20:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Equivalents of Duke in other European languages
The page was deleted because it was a list page, and should be merged into the "Duke". However, it was deleted without this being done -Huyderman (talk) 23:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Wait, what? Who said anything about merging anything? It's a list of translations of duke into other languages. There's nothing encyclopedic here to merge. You can find the same translations by going to Duke and looking at "Languages" in the toolbar to the left. Wilhelm Meis (&#9742; Diskuss &#124; &#x270D; Beiträge) 21:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The deletion proposal said "A list of translations of a word is outside the scope of Wikipedia (see WP:NOT). The proper place for this content would be in the "duke" article at Wiktionary . Additionally, verifiability and notability have not been established." Note: this refers explicitly to the duke article at Wiktionary, not the duke article on Wikipedia. Also, it appears the objection was not raised until 26 July (18 days after the article was deleted), by an editor who never had any involvement with the article (nor made ANY edits other than this objection since 2009). I don't see any appearance that the objection raised is founded in policy or deletion procedure. Please delete again per the original PROD rationale. Wilhelm Meis (&#9742; Diskuss &#124; &#x270D; Beiträge) 23:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * We only delete once under the prod. Once challenged it is not to be used again. But you are correct in that what is there does not make an article. I am expecting that the requestor will make use of the content for improving Wiktionary.  If attribution is not needed then a G6 delete can be used to give this the chop. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Wilhelm Meis (&#9742; Diskuss &#124; &#x270D; Beiträge) 17:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Jha (surname)
page was relatively new and contents were being added. It shouldn't be deleted just for looking like a blog page. -87.210.192.27 (talk) 08:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

subisu
I am writing this article because this is the first company who has provide the internet service through cable TV and this one is more important in Nepal as well and this is not for business purpose -Adhikarimahesh (talk) 09:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Shoe Fest
There was no reason to have this article removed. It is a factual depiction of a legitimate music festival. -Jwsausen (talk) 17:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. To have a Wikipedia article, it is not enough to be "a factual depiction of a legitimate festival": the inclusion criterion is called Notability and requires references showing [[WP:42|significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources

]]. JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Emerante Morse
Although the original PROD states that Morse is "Not a notable person", in fact she was and is a renowned Haitian singer and folkloric dancer, as the article on her son, Richard Auguste Morse, correctly states. It is very hard to find information about her online, but her contribution to world music and dance is significant. -71.192.161.255 (talk) 21:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. If the article is to be kept, it is very important to find references. The Verifiability policy is that "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and the Notability requirement is for evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. References need not necessarily bye on-line, but they must be published, s that in principle it would be possible to check them. JohnCD (talk) 21:49, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Michael Arnstein
The page was adequately sourced with secondary sources but unfortunately deleted as created by a banned user. I want to further improve the page so i'm requesting a review and userfication -TheFruitarian (talk) 16:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Any update?--TheFruitarian (talk) 17:34, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done These requests are always a bit tricky, as you can see by the reluctance to answer. I'd say deletion review shoud be the next step, as an undeletion here would probably be not uncontroversial. Lectonar (talk) 07:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, and if you have a conflict of interest, you should probably declare it...just saying. Lectonar (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advise!--TheFruitarian (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Tornaibow
I believe that my Article Tornaibow was unfairly deleted because of simple misunderstanding and misenterptitation. the criteria for deletion was G3 vandalism, however after reading said criteria, i believe that my article was incorrectly cited and deleted. i wrote that original article because none existed with that name and or subject matter. any and all copyright infringement within my article was purely accidental and not intended. i wish to be informed of what material within my article should be edited or removed so as to rid it of any and all copyright infringement material. i apologize for any and all inconvenience this event caused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iliya.Pan (talk • contribs) 22:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done Unsourced, probable neologism. Please read WP:YOURFIRSTARTICLE. Lectonar (talk) 07:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Dacasso
The article was nominated for speedy deletion and deleted instantly. I didn't even have time to contest the nomination. The article was about a leather company which is notable by considering some cases. The White House also uses the brand. So, I think the article meets the notability of Wikipedia although it may need some modification. So, please kindly review the article and if possible, revive it. Thank you. -Sourov0000 (talk) 04:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. I followed some of the links, and....well, I feel like you are trying to lead us down the primrose path, in a way. The brand being used by the White house does not confer notability. Lectonar (talk) 07:55, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Looking at other articles this editor has created, there seems to be a pattern of filling up articles with useless references (maps, directory sites, blogs, press releases, etc.) to give the topic an illusion of notability. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:COMPETENCE, or more....? Lectonar (talk) 20:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I think "more", since the account is clearly not a newbie. I've prodded a few other of this editor's articles. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Yuval tisf Nativ
the article is about my teacher at college who deserves a page for being such an enthusiastic educator -RobinPWalker (talk) 15:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request.  Note however that being "an enthusiastic educator" is not a valid notability measurement as per  WP:ACADEMIC (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 16:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Inky Mail
I am not promoting the company in any way--I am merely just talking about a great mail client -Mtully95 (talk) 18:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Key word concept is "multiple mentions in reliable sources - not reviews or commentary".  Your "article" - now deleted 3 times - was tremendously non-encyclopedic (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 20:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Mazor Robotics
on July 19th Mazor_robotics was deleted by user:INeverCry, who is no longer an administrator,  clamming that it is promotional material.

I respectfully disagree with the deletion and would like to know what would be the proper way to appeal. Mazor robotics is a publicly traded company that developed a unique medical device, that has value and interest to Wikipedia readers.

When writing the article, i have used other Wikipedia articles as references such like MAKO_Surgical_Corp., Intuitive Surgical, Medtronic and more. there was no intention to publish any promotional material, and it was intend to meet the Wikipedia standards.

if I failed to meet or break any guideline, I would assume that the proper way to deal with the article should be to edit the wrong phrases. the way it was done - a brutal deletion seems to be too aggressive.

please kindly advise how should I proceed.

finally, unfortunately, I do not have a copy of the original article and can't even start to edit it.

thank you for your help

ap2297 -Ap2297 (talk) 11:04, 29 July 2013 (UTC) Ap2297 (talk) 11:04, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * X mark.svg Not done Well, the deletion was logged as a G11 (perhaps he was in a hurry), but was indeed meant as a G5, as the main content of the article was witten by confirmed sockpuppets. So you will have to go via deletion review here, as an undeletion via this board would not be uncontroversial. Also, allow me to be a bit wary as you, being a "new" user, managed to find this page straight off. Lectonar (talk) 14:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * ap2297 I feel trapped in a situation taken from Kafka, where one problem leads to another, with no way out. it all starts from a pure mistake, of inconstantly violating the rule of sockpuppets, then my user name was blocked, then the article was deleted. in order to appeal, I have not other choice but to open a new user (ap2297) and now I can't even defend the article because i am a suspected "new user".
 * my original user name is ap2296. User was blocked with an expiry time of indefinite due to Abusing multiple accounts (see Sockpuppet_investigations/Morning277).
 * I admit that I made a mistake by offering other people who works under the same LAN to edit the article I wrote. it is a mistake, I admit, but I never personally used multiple accounts, and had no intention of do it.  I regret that other people working under the same LAN edited the same article. I was unaware to the rule, and promise not to do it again.
 * then the article in discussion Mazor Robotics was deleted due to the same reason and since my user name was blocked, I have no way to defend my case and argue that the article should be published.
 * more over, I don't have a copy of my work, and I have no idea how to find it in the Wikipedia recycle bin and try to re submit it under a new user name (if that's the right procedure.
 * so please, can someone help an innocent man who got into trouble  with the Wikimedia police to be bailout and be accepted back to society?


 * thank you for listening.


 * Ap2297 (talk) 12:34, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * As I said above: go to deletion review, and you are very far from Kafka here, unless you are turning into a beetle as we speak. Lectonar (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Milutin Pavlovic
92.244.150.56 (talk) 06:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of article Minetest
The page was deleted without warning. The reason given, "R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace" for deletion was ludicrous because en:Minetest was a real page and was never a redirection. Furthermore, Minetest fits the notability criterion, and it is already available in multiple other languages including German de:Minetest, French fr:Minetest, Russian ru:Minetest, Chinese zh:Minetest and Cantonese zh-yue:Minetest. -Anthony Fok (talk) 09:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Minetest, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 12:13, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Colossus bets
The article is factually accurate as stated in the terms and conditions of colossus bets at (Redacted) -RossOlliver (talk) 10:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 12:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Barbara Beck
reasoning -97.79.165.242 (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC) Barbara Beck was an important news anchor in LA who must have hurt somebody's feelings along the way because her Wikipedia page was deleted. Can you restore it?
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Although an expired WP:PROD (it was deleted >1.5 years ago), the biography of living persons policy requires extensive referencing, and based on those in the deleted article, she will not meet our notability requirements.  Clearly wrong to suggest it was deleted for any other reason. (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 18:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Qpawn
reasoning -Katrasay (talk) 13:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

The article was about one of the longest running popular forum games qpawn, which has been going since 1998. the article was not finished. and importantly the article does not aim to just promote the game it is merely for people interested in the history of such forum games. And for people interested in such games the history of this game is very important because it started this particular genre of games. And currently on wiki there is no current background on the history of these games.


 * X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user . If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
 * Please see Notability and Notability (web) to understand the inclusion criteria for such articles, and why this article failed to meet them. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Profound Decisions Ltd
I missed the PROD and would have objected. According to the deletion log, the article had no independent references, but that doesn't match my memory. The article was horrendously out of date, and I've been meaning to find the time to update it for a while, but I still believe it was useful. If it's not appropriate to undelete directly, can I request userfication so I can bring it back up to scratch? -—me_and 09:07, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 09:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I now see my memory was wrong (I was thinking of Maelstrom (live role playing game)), and have commented as such at User talk:Stuartyeates; if it gets AfD'd (or re-PROD'd, if that's possible in this circumstance), I'll not contest the deletion, but merely request userfication. —me_and 10:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BambooCommune
reasoning -BambooCommune (talk) 09:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done It was not deleted before your request, but is now. This was pure and simple spamming. Please read WP:FAQ/business.Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Movie Feuds
reasoning -SpaceCaseGame (talk) 16:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Why would you delete a article on a Youtube certain channel, but not delete other youtube channel articles? I created the page quickly, and planned on doing a lot of improving, for I work 2 jobs, and do not have alot of time on my hands. If you would have just given me more time to work, I would have stated the "importance" of this article. Please undelete this page, for I was still working on it.
 * Oddly enough, you appear to have already known that it should not be in "live" articlespace, as you took a draft and moved it. Drafts exist for things that are not even close to be ready for the actual encyclopedia because of things like notability.  EVERY article must meet notability BEFORE it goes into articlespace.  Please also review this concept when it comes to deletion discussions - every article must stand on its own, and cannot be compared to other articles/topics (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 16:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Kevin Thelwell
reasoning -90.204.190.106 (talk) 20:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC) I would be grateful if you could reinstate the above mentioned page. The individual in question has recently been appointed as Head of Football Development and Recruitment at Wolverhampton Wanderers FC. On this basis he becomes one of the few "Directors of Football" currently employed within English Football, a position of huge interest in the modern game and to the public in general. Page to be updated to reflect tis in due course. As such I believe that this warrants the restoration of the page.
 * ✅ I suggest updating the article as soon as possible to avoid re-deletion. Lady  of  Shalott  20:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Comm Int.JPG
Works by Boris Kustodiev (d. 1927) are evidently - judged by the number of his images uploaded to Commons - in the public domain both in the United States and in the source country. -Eleassar my talk 07:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅, but consider transferring this image to Commons if it is truly public domain. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

scientific wizard
It's authentic -Richu 11:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Deon Swiggs
Mr. Swiggs has many noteative resources and references. He is a great Rebuild Icon and has been recognised gy 3news NZ and even Stuff.co.nz. I think to suggest there is insufficient references is silly. -LukeChandlerNZ (talk) 15:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * . The admin who closed Articles for deletion/Deon Swiggs evidently viewed the arguments in favor of deleting as stronger. If you feel the closing decision was improper, inform the closing admin and take your case to Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:42, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

User:Jamaal E. Carter
reasoning -Jamaal E. Carter (talk) 17:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code (replacing   with the name of the page you wish to have restored and   with the reason for your request).

Bioscale
This was at articles for creation when it was rather rudely deleted without warning. I'd just like to get a copy of it. -70.79.73.253 (talk) 09:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Typically, we restore recently deleted AFC submissions unless they a) have copyright issues, b) are unambiguous promotion/advertising, or c) are attack pages. You have chosen not to go that route, and merely want a copy of the contents. Unfortunately, as an anonymous editor, you don't have a WP:SANDBOX or an e-mail addresses associated with you, so it is difficult to provide the contents. (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 10:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you send it to  please? 70.79.73.253 (talk) 01:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ Mail sent Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Article Incubator/ITablet
Deleted at a WP:NOQUORUM discussion, now needed to proceed at Article Incubator/Greenhouse Please also undelete the talk page. Unscintillating (talk) 00:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Apple Users' Society of Melbourne (AUSOM Inc)
New material is now available and the article is to be amended and resubmiied -AUSOM PO (talk) 03:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

ferdie catropa
reasoning -68.191.34.228 (talk) 03:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC) 1969 westchester county jr golf champion
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bethsaida AG Church
I, Vibinandrews, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Vibinandrews (talk) 10:28, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Shane barnard
reasoning -83.93.58.100 (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC) You should probably try googling him again, as there are plenty of material about him, like interviews, videos, homepages etc. So it makes no sense that you found only advertisements, as that is simple not true. Kind regards, Tina Rosenberg
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bethsaida AG Church
Hope to revise content and submit per policy -Vibinandrews (talk) 11:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✔️ It is already restored, see above and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bethsaida AG Church Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

sebuikan karate academy jlt
i was working on it will recreated if wikipedia thinks it is promotional,kind regards Sid -Sidisfamous (talk) 11:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually the user would be wanting Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Still . The deleted article was not deleted because it was promotional, it was deleted because the organization lacks notability.
 * There was almost no information about this academy; the bulk of the article consisted of a general description of karate (for which we already have an article) as well as WP:HOWTO advice, which isn't allowed. Also, the English was nearly incomprehensible and would have required a major re-write to correct.
 * Finally, the article included zero sources as required by WP:CORP, and it contained zero assertion of significance or notability. The article was therefore correctly deleted per WP:CSD.
 * If Sidisfamous wants to build this article, he can do so in his own sandbox, not in main article space. There wasn't enough valid content beyond the short lead paragraph to make it worth restoring or even userfying. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

himank jain
It will have multiple sources linked and will be recreated ,kind regards sid -Sidisfamous (talk) 12:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks like a CV, so ❌. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:39, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Ruthy Alon
Some days ago I received a warning message about a deletion proposal of my 'Ruthy Alon' entry. I gave a glance to the motivations and it seemed to me that I understood what kind of changes I needed to do and that I had time until august 4th. Today, on august 2, I intended to make changes to the entry but I discovereDanielaagazzi 12:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)d that someone deleted my page. I cannot access to the text now. Please help. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielaagazzi (talk • contribs)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Danielaagazzi/Ruthy Alon. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arun Vinayak
many information was there on that page. -117.206.82.105 (talk) 21:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There was not much information on that page, not even a claim of importance. See Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arun Vinayak Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Barada Bhushan Chakraborty
All iformation is authentic according to the references mentioned -Arun Balubari Chakraborty (talk) 06:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ - the article has been restored and improved by user . JohnCD (talk) 09:23, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Jordan Pickford
Has become a notable subject today by playing his first game in a professional association football team, thereby passing WP:NFOOTY -Clicriffhard (talk) 17:50, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ❌. The deleted article said only "Jordan Pickford is an english under 16 football golekeeper" plus irrelevant family detail; but I have unprotected the title so that you can make an article. Make sure to include a reliable source to show how he meets WP:NFOOTY. JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Guillermo Cervera (photographer)
reasoning -Lolagars (talk) 23:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC) This article was deleted for "(G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)" however Guillermo Cervera is one of the main Spanish photojournalist. Many evidences of the importance of this photographer you cand find them at many interviews with him for example: at The New York Times: http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/28/trading-war-for-waves/ At Vice magazine: http://www.vice.com/es/read/entrevista-guillermo-cervera-un-outsider-del-fotoperiodismo At Surfer Magazine: http://www.surfermag.com/features/danger-close-2/

It is the reason I don't understant what this article was deleted and I request for undeletion, thank you,
 * Do want this to go to WP:Articles for creation? It looks like the original attempt was to put it there, but it just went to mainspace instead.  The deletion nomination was for no claim of importance, but I disagree with that.  It is written in a slightly promotional way, but this could probably be corrected at AFC or in a sandbox. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:21, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

So, How can I undelete it? thank you,
 * ✅ - I have "userfied" the article for you to User:Lolagars/Guillermo Cervera (photographer) where you can work on it. There is a "submit" button at the top which will send it to WP:Articles for creation for review. I suggest that you add those references so that they can be accessed from the article - see WP:CITE for advice - and any others that show independent sources discussing his work; also, try to make it more neutral in tone, avoiding "peacock" words like "unparalleled". JohnCD (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Fantastic, thank you. I already changed the article, added the sources and submited: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lolagars/Guillermo_Cervera_%28photographer%29 I will wait for the ok. Thank you

Paul Loeb the dog trainer
He is an author of many books on dog training, been on many TV shows, on the Lecture circuit with Dr. Benjamin Spock and currently doing dog training in NY. I have no idea why his page was deleted, and can't find out why so this request may be inappropriate. However, I would rather update the old page than create a new one. I found the following reference to the old page on the web http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/index.html?curid=11835685 if that would help locate it. -Gap1234 (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user, who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. As you can see, there is very little there: in particular, there are no references to WP:Verify what the article says, so I have added a "BLP-prod" template which you may remove when you have added at least one reliable source, failing which it will be deleted again in ten days. JohnCD (talk) 17:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Gil Christner
I am still writing and performing and appearing on television and in films, and I have more and/or more recent credits than Warren Thomas, Larry Bubbles Brown,  Jim Giovanni, to name but a few who still have their wikipedia pages intact. -76.95.68.217 (talk) 17:59, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

fiqarnot
reasoning -fiqarnot.com 20:29, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself.  Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. and also this was just an advertisement. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Ram Rudra Prasad Deo
Ram Rudra Prasad Deo Is A Former Principal District Judge (Jharkhand).Judge Deo was born in Jaisidh ,Deoghar (Jharkhand). Date of Joining In Judicial Service 18.10.1982.He did L.L.B from T.N.B Law College, Bhaglpur. Judge Deo remembered for his judicial accountability, probity in public life and social justice.

links 1.http://www.veethi.com/places/jharkhand-deoghar-district-367.htm 2.http://digideoghar.webs.com/ 3.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deoghar_district 4.jajharkhand.in/about/pdf/list_dist_judg.pdf? 5.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasidih‎

He Is Famous Judge In Jharkhand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshdeo4 (talk • contribs) 06:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Harshdeo4/Ram Rudra Prasad Deo. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact, the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.  Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk) 13:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Dixie Evans
Subject no longer living therefore not subject to deletion as unreferenced biography of living persons; significant references available -70.173.177.21 (talk) 08:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. JohnCD (talk) 12:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ID SOFT CORPORATION
I, 124.43.233.76, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 124.43.233.76 (talk) 08:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Southwest Airlines Flight 345
I wish to work on expanding the deleted article in my user space, what with the new NTSB finding made public today, and upcoming possible hull loss proceedings by the airline. The deleted article is becoming borderline notable already, and I would like to work on it some more. Per discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Southwest_Airlines_Flight_345#6_August_2013.2C_2nd_NTSB_Update I have been directed here to seek userification of this AfDed article, complete with its edit history. -Mareklug talk 02:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Mareklug/Southwest Airlines Flight 345. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:44, 7 August 2013 (UTC)