Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archives/August 2009

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gutensite


I want a copy of the original article for my records, perhaps that means it needs to be userfied, or emailed to me. Eventually I'd like to know why it was deleted so I can contest or improve upon the article. It's a worthy Content Management System that deserves to be an article on Wikipedia. Chadwick Meyer 05:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Chadwickmeyer
 * I can't find any deleted article at Gutensite or Gutensite:. Also, nothing in your deleted contributions remotely similar. -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  15:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I have already restored the article to User:Chadwickmeyer/Gutensite and left a message at the editor's talkpage.  Skomorokh  15:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

EurekaDB


userfly Please email me the deleted page so changes could be made. Thanks EurekaDBwiz (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No page has ever existed at that title. Are you sure it's correct? lifebaka++ 20:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Looking at the editor's talk page, s/he might mean Eurekadb. I personally don't like to userfy coi pages, but I won't fault anyone else who wants to.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  22:58, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ I've emailed the content, please do not re-introduce it unless you can improve it such that it meets inclusion guidelines. – xeno  talk  23:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Okumkpa


Okumkpa is a traditional African performance. It was exhibitied in Seattle Art Museum recently (see Seattle Art Museum and African Art Gallery). The post was speedy deleted as a "Blantant hoax" (why?), which is entirely untrue. If that's not possible, please send the original text back to me so that I can keep record for myself. Thanks.MrsPorter (talk) 02:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅. I suggest you place a under construction tag on articles you're working on to avoid further misunderstandings. Cheers.

Metastorm


other business software companies are represented on Wikipedia including SAP & IBM. Also looking for userfication. Saustin1 (talk) 15:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * ✅ Userfied to User:Saustin1/Metastorm. Given that it's been speedied several times, I'd strongly suggest placing a helpme tag on your talk page and having someone look it over before moving it back to main space.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  17:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Traditional marriage movement


Contested AfD, a weak consensus determined that, after 7 days of discussion, the article failed to demonstrate notability. I'd like to cut the article down a bit, look for more/better sources and maybe give it a go again Schrandit (talk) 06:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅. Available at User:Schrandit/Traditional marriage movement. If the DRV upholds the deletion, please make sure you talk to an admin before returning this to mainspace. Protonk (talk) 06:41, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

TheAmazingAtheist


To merge a sentence or two in to Jokela school shooting. Restore the history and redirect it to Jokela school shooting and I will retrieve what I need from the history.--Otterathome (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Otterathome (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Protonk (talk) 19:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

User:Kevin/watch


User page Kevin (talk) 02:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Ta - Kevin (talk) 03:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Trustive


This page was previously reviewed and kindly corrected by Fabrictramp in June this year. It was then deleted a couple of days ago by Bearcat who deemed it too commercial. I had tried to write the page in a factual way (as many other companies have done on Wikipedia) explaining who Trustive is, what they do and for whom the do it. Could I have some feedback as to why the page was recently deleted please? I am happy to make some changes if required and if I know which bits of the text were viewed as too commercial. I would like to get a Trustive page back online asap and so would appreciate your feedback. Many thanks. Oldfieldev (talk) 07:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not seeing the unambiguous advertising here. Since deleted it, s/he is probably the only one who can tell you exactly why it was deleted. I'll move it to a subpage of your user page so you can work on it in the mean time.-- Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Qik Article in wikipedia
Hi,

Recently, I have an article by the title of "Qik". It has been replaced by another article called "Qik". I would wish to get back that article and can you tell me why it has been replaced by the new article of QIK? My article is about the mobile blogging website and not the Quantas intelligence. Hopeful that you can help me out with that.

Thanks,

Meng Kiat —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mengkiat (talk • contribs)


 * The Qik article was deleted as advertising that would take a major rewrite to become encyclopedic. I've restored the article and deleted large sections that were fundamentally advertising. Iit still needs more pruning, which I might get a chance to do later today.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  15:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Fabrictramp,

Thanks for your reply. I have seen the "Qik"Article. Could I have the latest version before the deletion? I would just want it for recording purposes. I will also look at the "Qik" article and make some adjustments. It would be great if you can allow me some time before making further changes. Would like to stay in constant contact so that I can have a "Qik" article on Wikipedia. Will also invite other people to contribute to that article.

Thanks alot!

From: MengKiat


 * The article history is intact. Just go to Qik, click on the history tab, and you can see all the revisions.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  00:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Mediary


From: Cavycorner125

The article Mediary said it had an advertisement on it and was removed, it is like Facebook and myspace though, if Facebook can do it then why can't I? It's just talking about my site that is like Facebook!!! :( Anyways, can I re-edit it and take away what I have to and keep it posted? reply soon, thanks!: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cavycorner125 (talk • contribs) 19:35, August 20, 2009
 * ❌ Please take this to deletion review. I can't unilaterally overturn a speedy deletion like that. Alternately, I would suggest that you edit something else, since writing about yourself or your website is not likely to prove fruitful. Protonk (talk) 19:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Ujaan Welfare Society of Salt lake (India)


Hello sir. I am the author of the following article and i am really without any clue why my article got deleted. the informations given in the article are all true and the article is written on the request of the members supporting the social welfare society called Ujaan Welfare Society of Salt Lake. i am ready to provide all the documents proving its authenticity. i would be obliged if you reconsider your decision as this organization means a lot for many. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritu.seasonflower (talk • contribs) 09:54, August 21, 2009
 * deleted it according to speedy deletion criterion A7, no indication that it meets the guidelines for inclusion. In looking at the deleted article, it reads quite a bit like an advertisement, and your statement that it was written at the request of the members reinforces that.


 * I'd suggest reading Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:COI. If you think you can write an unbiased, non advert version of the article that meets the notability requirements, come back here and request that it be userfied so you can have some time to work on it as a subpage of your user page.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Westlakes Wildcats


So that I can re-make my page about the fictional soccer/football team Westlakes Wildcats which is based on a real life team. I have now compiled a list of references to add some credibility to the article, and there will be more references added if the article is undeleted and I am given the chance to add to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oblivion3 (talk • contribs) 07:18, August 21, 2009


 * You've already started a new version at User:Oblivion3/Westlakes Wildcats. No need to restore the old one.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * And I'd suggest you read WP:Notability. While you've added a lot of references, there's nothing in your new version hinting at any real world notability. HTH.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the help

Paradise Isle


So I can improve on the article about the 1937 film (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0029374/) and not start from scratch. Bensin (talk) 17:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The deleted article only had an infobox about a fictional country and no other content. You'd have to start from scratch anyway. -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  18:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanks! --Bensin (talk) 18:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

MSNBC controversies


RE:. Could the deleted content please be userfied under the original editor's account, User:PokeHomsar, or alternatively under mine? I wish to review the content with the original user to help them understand why it was deleted and to help them improve their contributions in the future. GoRight (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Just a comment -- at Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive556 I had recommended this go to WP:DRV, not here because it's a bit outside of our scope. However, if any other admin feels comfortable userfying on your own, be my guest.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  20:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Sigh. I don't know how I missed that. I guess I was distracted. Since the user in question is now showing little interest in pursuing this with me, simply cancel my request here. I am not sure of the process for doing so or I would do so myself. Sorry for the interruption. --GoRight (talk) 22:04, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * No problems. We'll just mark it resolved. And now you know about WP:REFUND and WP:DRV. :) -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  22:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Supreme Master TV
Hi I'm not sure why my article on Supreme Master TV was deleted. It seems notable, and it has even been linked to from outside sources (I had nothing to do with said external linking) The deletion reason given was "as per last time no sources" despite the article itself having several. The fact that it was deleted in only a few days for a dubious reason makes me a little suspicious that the delitionist himself might have a biased again this article.Deathawk (talk) 01:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)