Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה/Archive

03 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets






 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

My sockpuppetry sniffer wiggled at new user SevaSevaSeva's repetition of some BLP issues at Michael Lerner, and I discovered what I think is a big sockfarm. It includes using multiple usernames at Categories for discussion/Log/2010 December 28 (see Category:Descendants of Holocaust survivors). I only scratched the surface; this needs a full investigation (and I don't have time at the moment.) jpgordon:==( o ) 20:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * By the way, my edit and rollback here was me conflating one piece of email with another, so I used the wrong name. --jpgordon:==( o ) 16:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Edits are all over the place, but it could use a look. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Edits certainly are all over the place. ✅:
 * Hope this helps. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hope this helps. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hope this helps. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hope this helps. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hope this helps. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * אֶפְרָתָה (Efrata) is the oldest of the accounts, so I'm changing the report to reflect that. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Now then, I've blocked and tagged all the accounts. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'm relisting with אמין מקור, another possible account found by Dougweller. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:48, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, here you go. I suspect this is the list to which Jpgordon was referring, above. ✅ the following:
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

15 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

This "new" editor is behaving in the same manner as User:Contacteeperson and User:SevaSevaSeva (two previously blocked puppets of אֶפְרָתָה) did: hacking material out of articles about progressive Jewish organizations and then PRODding them. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

File:JohnDio.jpg and File:LouisCohen.jpg were orphaned, and subsequently deleted, due to edits by User:Oh boy my danny boy and User:Koehann respectively. The editing style is very similar to User:Mynameisstanley (see related sockpuppet investigation) who has edited these articles in the exact same manner. 71.184.53.150 (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Adding a CU for sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the IP range is a /19 that would catch a lot of innocent users. --jpgordon:==( o ) 06:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)


 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

09 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

A longterm dynamic IP user brought this to my attention at my talk page. There is additional evidence he presented at WP:REFUND, and while they're all very DUCKy to me, there seem to have been numerous socks uncovered before, so I'd like a CU to look at this. This might be related to Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה/Archive as well (see the IP's comments at the WP:REFUND link above). / ƒETCH COMMS  /  23:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

User:Avenue_DAvenue_D has been removing summary and licensing information from several Jewish-American mobster images. These are among the images similarly edited by User:Mynameisstanley sockpuppets Rainsystemo, Martian Moon, and SlaughteredSnakes. User:Massapeeqhaa has also removed information under misleading edit summaries and has prodded at least one article  for reasons very similar to User:Mynameisstanley. 71.184.39.202 (talk) 03:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Boyzhoodrat has five edits total, four of which are PRODs of Jewish-American mobsters. I actually carried out the PROD on Mersher Miller, which has been since undeleted. --j &#9883; e deckertalk to me 07:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I'm endorsing, but only to check the socks against each other, and also against אֶפְרָתָה. The data for Mynameisstanley and all its socks is stale, unfortunately. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * in progress. -- Luk  talk 10:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, that was painful... here's a bundle of socks linked to Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה (jewish mob articles). I'm not sure Mynameisstanley has much to do with this (wasn't he living in the US? These are in Israel)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * almost
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I probably missed some, this is a dynamic range. Considering the amount of checks I've made here, please double check the users seem related before blocking :). -- Luk  talk 12:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * As these are all under this אֶפְרָתָה, I've moved the relevant case to that SPI page. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, I've gone through and blocked and tagged all the ones that seem to match based on behavior. What a mess. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * has voted in a lot of AfD's. His !votes should probably be struck out. -- &oelig; &trade; 15:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that is related to, who is also related to the confirmed socks (e.g., ). 俄国 and UDFy-38135539 both edited the Russian Mafia page quite a bit, and UDFy-38135539 and Giant Grayfish have similar user pages, both reading like news articles about (then-) current events. In addition, the AfD votes of  are similar to the few that  made, consisting of "as per above" or "as per nominator". In such a case, Articles for deletion/Leib Pinter would possibly need to be re-opened. However, as this evidence isn't really strong, I'm not going to bother blocking. I doubt the accounts will edit again anytime soon. / ƒETCH  COMMS  /  17:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

08 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

I suspect user apronming might be yet another sockpuppet on this farm -- this user just appeared on March 6, 2011 and the very first thing it did was recommend deleting the Yonassan Gershom page -- a page that was previously under attack by "contacteeperson," a proven sockpuppet on this list who was targeting Jewish Renewal rabbis. It seems very suspicious that a totally new user would go right away to requesting to delete a page on a Renewal rabbi -- and for a rather dumb reason -- see the Yonassan Gershom discussion page Rooster613 (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Moved from archive. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  23:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * What a mess. This whole list are ✅ matches to each other and a match to the sockmaster:
 * TN X Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 00:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * All blocked and tagged. What a mess. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

17 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Based on contributions, seems to be a fairly obvious sock of this prolific sockpuppeter. Also, given recent history, the sockmaster no doubt has many other active socks. Jayjg <small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 04:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The following are all the same: Block all. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  18:38, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts blocked. — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 21:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

06 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Edits are similar to those of. CU for clarification, and also to see if there are any new sleepers on this account. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Well, here we go. ✅ the following:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 22:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

14 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:DUCK - Uriel227 has been edit-warring at Dylan and Cole Sprouse and has been reported at WP:3RRN. After several warnings, Uriel228 has been created and is now making identical edits to Dylan and Cole Sprouse. Even before I have posted this report, another editor has expressed the same opinion. AussieLegend (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This actually appears to be a different blocked user evading their block. ✅ the following:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * for the closure of WP:AN3. Also for a histmove (fancy way of saying move to the correct page with holding the other revisions still) to the master Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה. DQ.alt (t)  (e)    17:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. AN3 report closed. T. Canens (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * for the closure of WP:AN3. Also for a histmove (fancy way of saying move to the correct page with holding the other revisions still) to the master Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה. DQ.alt (t)  (e)    17:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. AN3 report closed. T. Canens (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * for the closure of WP:AN3. Also for a histmove (fancy way of saying move to the correct page with holding the other revisions still) to the master Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה. DQ.alt (t)  (e)    17:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. AN3 report closed. T. Canens (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * for the closure of WP:AN3. Also for a histmove (fancy way of saying move to the correct page with holding the other revisions still) to the master Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה. DQ.alt (t)  (e)    17:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. AN3 report closed. T. Canens (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * for the closure of WP:AN3. Also for a histmove (fancy way of saying move to the correct page with holding the other revisions still) to the master Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה. DQ.alt (t)  (e)    17:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. AN3 report closed. T. Canens (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

19 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:DUCK. Shares the same editing pattern, eg. remove most of an articles content and prod the article, reason "He is not notable person". Revisiting the same area, eg. Russian Mafia. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following:
 * And a bunch more. I'll block/tag those. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  11:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Those three blocked. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 20:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And a bunch more. I'll block/tag those. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  11:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Those three blocked. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 20:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Those three blocked. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 20:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

07 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Burkina Faso's first edit was on an AFD, and the second was on Bat Ayin, a place where this master previously edited. CU for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:21, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Are you sure there are no sleepers on this? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was surprised too. There were some old accounts that I blocked, but nothing current. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, good deal. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

03 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Lactarius volemus's only edits were to request deletion of the Yonassan Gershom page, which was previously requested to be deleted by apronming, a proven sockpuppet in this farm, and also attacked by contacteeperson, another proven sockpuppet (see discusion on the page.) The request fits a pattern of IDs from this sockfarm attacking Jews connected to the Jewish Renewal movement and/or the peace movement in connection with the Arab-Israeli conflict. (It was voted to keep the Yonassan Gershom page, so hopefully this will end these attacks on that page.]] Rooster613 (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)