Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/أحمد المنصورة/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Tag-team edit warring on Sunni Islam. After شامخ_بشموخ reached the limit of WP:3RR with this edit, أحمد_المنصورة picks up the slack here. Notably, all of the edits by أحمد_المنصورة have occurred after the most recent edit by شامخ_بشموخ. Both editors have given very basic support of each other and, though I'm not sure if that editor is related. The editors reported here have been edit warring to restore changes originally made by this one, though. clpo13(talk) 17:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Duplicate SPI at Sockpuppet investigations/شامخ بشموخ. شامخ بشموخ has the older edits, but according to the logs أحمد المنصورة is the older account. Can an admin or clerk merge these? Thanks. clpo13(talk) 17:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

متحور shows up to continue reverting after أحمد_المنصورة is blocked for edit warring. clpo13(talk) 18:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

no, I have only one account on Wikipedia.أحمد المنصورة (talk) 17:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Clearly either a sock or a meatpuppet.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * After reviewing an unblock request, these are ✅ matches to one another:
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)


 * All indeffed and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

After several socks engaging in an edit war at Sunni Islam were identified the other day, this user has reverted the same content. All but one of their edits are from today, apparently with the goal of circumventing semi-protection. Eperoton (talk) 20:03, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * This is clearly a puppet of either the sock or the meat variety. Checkuser should be able to tell us which option it is, but neither is acceptable and I've indef blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm, it seems we have some sleeper accounts here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ Doug Weller  talk 20:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

account already blocked and tagged. Closing. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)