Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/علوي قزلباشي/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

علوي قزلباشي was partial-blocked by Moneytrees on 13 December for copyright violations at Draft:Abd-us-Salam Shah, the "33rd Imam of the Nizari Ismaili Shia Islam community", copying from http://ismaili.net/heritage/node/18170.

Today I have removed copyright violations added by Shahsol at Al-Mustansir billah II Ali Shah, the "32nd Imam of the Nizari Ismaili Shia Islam community", copying from http://ismaili.net/heritage/node/10642. DanCherek (talk) 17:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅ to . Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 17:41, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I've converted the partial block into a checkuser partial block. I've blocked the sock indef. As the master is still not fully blocked, any admin has my permission to convert the block into a full (non-partial) block without necessarily consulting with another CU. This is because changing the block to a full block does not undo or loosen the partial block. However, on any unblock request a CU should be consulted if a non-CU wants to unblock the user such that they can now edit article and/or draftspace again. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 18:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edits on the same or very similar ( vs  ) quite niche articles (all edits relating to Isma'ili Imams), and the focus of their edits is very similar, i.e., redlinking historical Isma'ili Imams while removing transliteration-related diacritics (compare    to, e.g.,   ).

Behaviorally this may just not be enough, but it is certainly worth a CU check. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 15:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocking master indef. Master is not WP:3X banned as the block was until this point a partial block. Two more confirmations from this date will lead to a WP:3X ban. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Nothing left to do here, closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocking master indef. Master is not WP:3X banned as the block was until this point a partial block. Two more confirmations from this date will lead to a WP:3X ban. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Nothing left to do here, closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edits the same niche Isma'ilism-related articles ; main activity consists of adding or modifying (often removing diacritics) of (often redlinked) Isma'ili Imams                   (compare 26 December 2021 entry in the archive).

Rather obvious duck perhaps, but asking for CU since this is one more step towards a WP:3X. Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 09:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The account is already blocked, so any ongoing disruption has been dealt with. It seems to me that this could be closed with no further action.  I'll leave this on the requested queue since another CU may disagree with me, but I don't find "this is one more step towards a WP:3X" to be a compelling reason to run a check. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree there isn't a compelling case for CU here. Tagged as suspected, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 02:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)