Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی/Archive

22 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. As per WP:ANI, I am starting an SPI investigation to see what other socks and IPs are out there, and to see if a rangeblock is necessary. The sockmaster was initially temporarily blocked for sockpuppetry. He then used the noted IPs to evade the block, resulting in it being increased to an indef block. An SPI will allow us to confirm what other socks, if any, are out there. Singularity42 (talk) 19:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I've extended the block to indefinite, and also temporarily blocked one of the IPs. Drmies (talk) 19:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - We do not publicly link named accounts to IP addresses per the privacy policy. This request will need to be handled without the use of CheckUser. Tiptoety  talk 19:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This is a pretty small range. Rangeblocks should be feasible unless it's ridiculously busy - and it doesn't seem to be. T. Canens (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * hardblocked for 3 months. T. Canens (talk) 19:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

03 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. Sockmaster had history of creating copyvio articles, getting blocked, and then creating socks to evade the blocks. The new account Amardha is creating identical articles that were originally created by the sockmaster and then deleted as copyvios.

Mirasir has also re-created articles that were deleted by the sockmaster, which were subsequently edited by Amardha.

I will also be requesting a checkuser due to the multiple number of socks here.

(NOTE: Although not reflected in the archived case pages for this account, the sockmaster does have a history of socking. See Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of پارسا آملی.) Singularity42 (talk) 14:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I think you are missing 1) Shekleh Shah (which was created by Mirasir) and Shekle Shah (which was created by Northiran, one of the master's confirmed socks) - both of which are identical to each other, and 2) Sayyid Mir Heydar Tomb (which was created by Mirasir) and Tower Tomb Sayyed Se Ton (which was created by Northiran) - both of which are identical to each other. Singularity42 (talk) 18:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I know Checkuser came back inconclusive for Mirasir, but given the behavioural evidence, should he or she also be blocked? Consider the following
 * Created Sayyid Mir Heydar Tomb, an identical copy of Tower Tomb Sayyed Se Ton, created by Northiran, one of the master's confirmed socks.
 * Created Shekleh Shah, an identical copy of Shekle Shah, created by Northiran, one of the master's socks. It was later recreated in an identical matter by Amardha, now confirmed as another sock.
 * Created Moalagh Bridge, an article that relies on chnpress.com as an external link (which is currently down), which was the source of all of the other copyvios created by the confirmed socks.
 * Edits exclusively on Amol architecture related subjects, just like the master and all of the master's socks.
 * Given the DUCK nature of the behavioural evidence, I think this account should also be blocked. Singularity42 (talk) 22:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - but weakly.  Both Master and Mirasir had minor edits to Amol County but not the same content.  No other articles in common so inconclusive.  One article from master to Amardha, Amol.  Style of master isn't clearly duplicated by alleged socks but not ruled out either.  There is one common deleted article in deleted contribs by both master and Amardha, Davazdah Cheshmeh and one more with unlisted sock User:Northiran and Armardha, Malek Bahman Castle. Mirasir has no deleted contribs.  Amardha is reasonably possible, Mirasir is less likely.  Endorsing because of Amardha.  Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  17:27, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Amardha indef-blocked for repeated copyvio despite warnings, quite apart from any socking issues; but as one of his repeatedly-created copyvios was Davazdah Cheshmeh which was also created by the sockmaster, I think he is quite DUCKy. JohnCD (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * for Mirasir due to his exclusive use of open proxies. Amardha is a very match to previous, DUCK-blocked socks of پارسا آملی.  AGK  [•] 22:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Not enough evidence to block Mirasir at this time. Perhaps after more edits, a better comparison could be made.   Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  22:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

04 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Immediately after the most recent sock was blocked, the master edited from the above IP address (which is within the range of IPs they have previously socked from) to re-add content that was originally added by the sock and then removed by other editors. Singularity42 (talk) 10:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious sock, static IP, blocked 1 year. Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  13:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

08 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Another day, another attempt to evade his block. Obvious duck. Another rangeblock, perhaps? Singularity42 (talk) 00:29, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
80.191.253.0/24 for 6 months, per previous range block and situation. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;   &copy;  15:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I blocked for 1 year as a static the other day here.  Very likely the same, would like confirmation on static.  Would leave a rangeblock to someone else.  Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  00:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * and as a bonus, their other contrib makes an intersect to Mirasir, who we didn't block last time due to not being sure. Worth a second look.    Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  00:39, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

17 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This is a second request for a review to determine if Mirasir is a sock of this master (please see archive for previous report). It was determined at the previous SPI case that due to proxies, Mirasir could not be confirmed using a Checkuser. The initial reviewing admin was not sure if there was enough behavioural evidence to determine if Mirasir was a sock. The same admin changed his mind due to another sock linking Mirasir and the master, but no action was taken against Mirasir.

Mirasir is pretty inactive these days. However, there is an ongoing AfD related to an article Mirasir created. If Mirasir is a sock of the master, that will have a very big impact due to the master having a history of copyvio problems, as well as possible application of WP:G5.

Here is the behavioural evidence:
 * 1) Northiran, a confirmed sock, created Tower Tomb Sayyed Se Ton, which was deleted. Mirasir re-created the article under a different name at Sayyid Mir Heydar Tomb.
 * 2) Northiran, a confirmed sock, created Shekle Shah, which was later deleted. Mirasir re-created the article under a different name, Shekleh Shah, which was deleted.  Amardha, a confirmed sock, re-created the article again under Shekleh Shah
 * 3) Moalagh Bridge, the article created by Mirasir which is currently up for AfD, used chnpress.com (a website that is currently down) as its primary source. This is part of the pattern of the sockmaster and his socks.
 * 4) Edits exclusively on Amol-related architecture articles, which is part of the pattern of the sockmaster and his socks.
 * 5) 80.191.253.165, a confirmed IP of the sockmaster, removed the AfD notice from Moalagh Bridge. The master has a pattern of using socks and IPs to remove AfD notices from articles created by other socks (see some of the warnings at User talk:Northiran, User talk:80.191.253.184, User talk:80.191.253.189). Singularity42 (talk) 22:05, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Excellently presented case, obvious sock that was indef blocked. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  01:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The IP in question was already caught up in the last /24 iprange block, so no further action needed there. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  01:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

20 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. Re-adding the same content again to Amol. Looks like he jumped to a new range to avoid the last rangeblock. Singularity42 (talk) 20:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I've added a Checkuser request. Given IP hopping, I'm wondering if its time to check for any other sock accounts out there. Singularity42 (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - CU won't link to IPs due to privacy concerns. Will to have to be determined using behavioral comparisons only. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  21:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked /24 for 6 months due to high amount of abuse coming from that C class network net-wide, and of course, this incident which obviously is a match. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  21:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

23 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK. This edit by the sock is identical to the edits made by the sockmaster's blocked socks. See, for example, this blocked sock's edit. Singularity42 (talk) 14:16, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged, closing. Rschen7754 01:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

20 October 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I'm not 100% sure about the 3rd and 4th usernames but the first 2 surely belong to him. and he probably has much more accounts you have to find. and all of these usernames have interest in articles related to city of Amol and Volleyball. this user also has an history in WikiFarsi, this is the list of accounts he had and you can find this Asianleag username there too. I think it's obvious for this one.

but for the first username (and the main one) I had to search a lot to be sure. I found the same username in wikicommons here and if you see he has exactly the same behavior like this user Ir92, I reported him in wikicommons too and they deleted most of his files but if you check both usernames talk pages here and here you can see he is uploading files for players of volleyball team Kalleh Mazandaran VC. it's obvious both of these accounts belong to one person and also you can see this user name Ir92 in this list. I think it's obvious he is the same person. I have more evidences but I think it's already enough and long. but I can provide them if necessary. Mohsen1248 (talk) 00:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I've opened a case on this user at Commons (see Commons:COM:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mazandiran, User:Mazandiran is a known sock.) January  ( talk ) 10:12, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Note that I've just blocked Luispedros indef per WP:CIR. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:00, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Master and most recent suspected sock are blocked, and the others are stale. Closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Adding and blocking Ir92 per the commons CU result. --Rschen7754 04:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

06 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

It's very obvious this user is the same as User:Luispedros, I reported only few days ago and he created another account. just check his edits. and he will not stop, since he has dynamic IP. Mohsen1248 (talk) 11:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is a ✅ match to and  (which according to the archives was confirmed to the master on Commons). I'll see if I can find some rangeblocks that make sense.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  22:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing as the sock has been tagged and blocked indef. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

26 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This edit here is almost the same as this one by confirmed sockpuppet User:Luispedros. Another account for him. Mohsen1248 (talk) 04:03, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Suspected sock blocked indef per duck test. Closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

22 February 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Exactly the same edit here and here and there are much more evidences if necessary. also the same behavior like putting unreferenced data to wiki pages and ignoring all notices in talk page. evidence for Davudhula, this and this. Mohsen1248 (talk) 22:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

JFI, he is writing in Fingilish, online translators can't translate it because it's not a real language. I can understand it and they are all personal attacks and he is threatening to create more accounts. and he says he will not stop. and if you want more evidences, there is a blocked account with the same username in wikicommons and for Edlatd, this account created a page Arash Keshavarzi I nominated for speedy deletion, as well as this page Mojtaba Mirzajanpour created by User:Luispedros and one IP user (belonged to him) removed both templates at the same time. Mohsen1248 (talk) 02:32, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I came to this via WP:AN3 in a report filed against Turdunamaki. Frankly, being unfamiliar with this master, I would have preferred more evidence from, but after some digging I found some behavioral evidence that linked Turdunamaki with User:Luispedros, a known puppet. If you look at User talk:Turdunamaki, you'll see that he responds frequently in what purports to be a foreign language. The odd thing is that if you run the material through Google translate, (a) it comes up with a different detected language each time and (b) it can't translate it. Although I can't prove it, that leads me to believe it's gibberish. Now take a look at User talk:Luispedros. In response to an ANI notice, he responded "chera englisi harf mizani amu etelate ghalatam hey nade be mardum mard bash". Google translate came up with a detected language (Igbo), which is not any of the detected languages for Turdunamaki's comments, and then, with the exception of a couple of words, couldn't translate it. As for the other two reigstered accounts listed above, neither has many contributions. However, in one of Edlatd's edits, he "corrected" the spelling of a name that other puppets have corrected. I didn't see anything for the other account. Although I've already blocked Turdunamaki based on duck, I think there's enough for a CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * There are numerous edits on fawiki, among other wikis. --Rschen7754 02:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The named accounts are, no comment with regard to the IP.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  21:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged the named accounts. I left the IP alone because he hasn't edited in five days.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * would you mind reporting this to CU-l? --Rschen7754 23:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay, I've been offline. Email sent.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

28 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Clearly the same person. confirmed it himself by his usual personal attacks to me in his talk page. Mohsen1248 (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Mohsen1248 (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, blocked, and tagged.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * As this involved cross-wiki socking I've emailed checkuser-l.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

19 October 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Clearly the same person as I know his behavior, but you can compare this edit and this one and that section about Kit manufacturer and Sponsor are exactly the same. as he has an interest of adding unreferenced information. beside that he has an account with the same name in Persian wikipedia and confirms he is the same person here in his talk page, even though it's in Persian but I just added it as another evidence. Mohsen1248 (talk) 15:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked per WP:DUCK.

26 November 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

He is the same person, as he simply accepted that in my talk page here. this is not in English, but in Fingilish. I have much more proof but I won't write them here since he will create more accounts in future and I don't want to help him hide his future accounts. I can provide them in private emails if anybody has doubts. Mohsen1248 (talk) 00:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've posted the results here. I just need a clerk to kindly merge the reports.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:36, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * (Archiving so the case can be merged.) Mike V  •  Talk  02:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

25 November 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

These accounts have already been blocked as sockpuppets. However, this user has renewed their threat to continue sockpuppeting, so an IP block would be appreciated. MER-C 08:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

and he just created another account Mohsen1248 (talk) 13:38, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following are all socks:




 * Note that was blocked as a sock of Mazandiran and  is named as an admitted sock of Mazandiran at the related SPI, he would be the master and this report should be moved/merged there. This is a cross-wiki blocked LTA sockmaster, any articles created by them should be nuked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  22:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * All accounts blocked and tagged. Mike V  •  Talk  02:31, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * was there anything that should be forwarded to the list? --Rschen7754 07:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * He's blocked (banned? I haven't checked) on Commons and fa.wiki, so they'll likely be interested in the latest round-up. The range of IPs is huge, there are likely more socks out there, but I don't have time to break out smaller ranges to sweep. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

28 November 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another account created by him, I didn't report properly earlier. Mohsen1248 (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - There's a fair amount of socks here and likely more sleepers as well. The majority of the accounts are apparent socks that add  to many pages. (e.g. 1, 2, 3) Other things include blanking sock templates of previously blocked accounts 4 and an affinity to the 2014 Asian Games articles (as seen in past socks) 5, 6, 7, 8.  Mike V  •  Talk  04:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

The following accounts are ✅. All.

The following account are. All.

The following account is. . PhilKnight (talk) 00:17, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

15 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

He is back once again, it's very obvious, I have much more proof but I won't write them here since he will create more accounts in future and I don't want to help him hide his future accounts. Mohsen1248 (talk) 14:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account has been blocked by Discospinster. Mike V  •  Talk  20:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

01 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious since he accepted that here, this is not in English but in Fingilish, the second account is also a sock. as he attacked on my talk page right after I asked for deletion of the page created by other account. Mohsen1248 (talk) 05:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * While I don't read Farsi, Volleyfans recent contribution seems to suggest that he is unhappy that Mohsen1248 reverted a number of his edits. However, Mohsen1248 has only reverted Volleyfans once. Clubir's deleted edit relates to olympic sporting topics, which seems to be an interest of past accounts. 1, 2 3, 4 I think a check would be helpful to provide further clarity and to check for additional accounts, which seems to pop up often with this sockmaster. Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 17:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * was previously listed as a sock in an earlier December report, but went unmentioned in the CU check. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  20:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The two socks are highly to each other, and  to the archive. Courcelles 04:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Given the behavioral evidence, I've blocked the accounts as socks of پارسا آملی. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 04:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

25 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

He is back and as usual he is trying to duplicate/somehow repeat my edits. as he is apparently obsessed with me. obviously he is the same user. Mohsen1248 (talk) 15:39, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The following accounts are ✅ to each other:



Technically, the accounts are to the archive based upon what's available on the CU wiki. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 22:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

06 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another account, editing/creating same articles as previous accounts. Mohsen1248 (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I have not received the reason for why I am being linked to another account, I have sent emails to the admin but got no response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptish (talk • contribs) 10:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Jacilason just confirmed being a sock by his usual personal attack to my talk page here. Mohsen1248 (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Farshidr90 and Jacilason are ..
 * Ptish is ❌. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Confirmed socks Polozaw, Adris25, and Mameam blocked and tagged. Awaiting behavioral investigation.—Bagumba (talk) 17:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Jacilason just left me this note in very broken english which seems to assert that he has dozens of accounts, and User:Mohsen1248 agrees with this interpretation .  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 13:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I have blocked User:Jacilason based on the above evidence provided by User:Mohsen1248, the content left on my talk page cited above, and the inconclusive result from the checkuser. If it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, then its probably a DUCK  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 14:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Ptish is ❌. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Confirmed socks Polozaw, Adris25, and Mameam blocked and tagged. Awaiting behavioral investigation.—Bagumba (talk) 17:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Jacilason just left me this note in very broken english which seems to assert that he has dozens of accounts, and User:Mohsen1248 agrees with this interpretation .  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 13:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I have blocked User:Jacilason based on the above evidence provided by User:Mohsen1248, the content left on my talk page cited above, and the inconclusive result from the checkuser. If it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, then its probably a DUCK  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 14:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Nothing left to do here; closing now. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 20:56, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

19 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Like his other accounts, he is obsessed with articles I'm editing and blanked all my last-edit articles, here, here and here for example. Mohsen1248 (talk) 15:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

22 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Like previous reports he is obsessed with me, right when I created this, few minutes later he made another account to create these articles, here and here. Mohsen1248 (talk) 11:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All his edits are deleted. A need an admin to tell me whether this is obvious sock of پارسا_آملی.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It seems very straightforward to me. I've blocked and tagged the account. <b style="color:#151B54">Mike V</b> • <b style="color:#C16C16">Talk</b> 14:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

30 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Re-creating articles he created with his other accounts. Mohsen1248 (talk) 09:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If there is still any doubt, just check his recent edits, he started to remove deletion tags from articles, if you look carefully, all 3 accounts did it almost at the same time, with 2-3 minutes difference. clearly they all belong to the same person. Mohsen1248 (talk) 22:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, I already provided evidence and it's clear all 3 accounts belong to the same person, this is a little hard for me to find all those deleted articles since they are deleted, but I can link to few of them. Gido Vermeulen, Frederic Winters‎, Arash Keshavarzi, Sebastián Solé, Mário Pedreira, Rolando Cepeda Abreu and there are much more. just check the list of articles created by all 3 accounts, most of them were created before by his previous sock accounts. Mohsen1248 (talk) 06:44, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, provide some evidence. Provide titles of those recreated articles. Provide links of edits. You should provide some evidence for every accounts when opening an investigation.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  23:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Half a minute looking at editing histories was more than enough to provide very clear evidence of sockpuppetry, and a few minutes were enough to make it clear that this is one of the most blatant cases of sockpuppetry that I have seen for a long time. Thank you, Mohsen1248, for drawing attention to this. The evidence goes way beyond what you posted, but what you provided was enough to point me in the right direction to look for more evidence. That is much better than posting everything here, as doing so would just give instructions to the sockpuppeteer advice on what tell-tale mistakes to avoid next time. I shall block all the accounts and delete the numerous articles they have created. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

13 August 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Once again re-creating articles he created with his other accounts. Mohsen1248 (talk) 13:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you check the archive we had exactly the same discussion 2 weeks ago ! He had so many accounts I can't remember which one created which article. Do I have to list these articles ? You simply can check his edit summary, almost all of these articles were created before by his other accounts, and btw you can check the edit summary and the timing, most of these articles were created in a period of one hour on 10 August. Mohsen1248 (talk) 20:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, list at least one such re-created article per suspected sock, and the original author of the article.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  19:31, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I checked all of the created articles and they were all previously created by other sockpuppets. All accounts blocked, all tagged, all articles deleted. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

03 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I reported sock accounts of this user so many times before and I know his behavior quite well, I'm not sure about this one but his behavior is quite similar, first what he wrote in my talk page is similar to his style, aggressive and not polite. (you can't read it though, not in English) and creating tones of articles only after 1-2 days of making a new account is quite similar to his other socks. even though I'm not completely sure this time but I think this is probably another sock account. Mohsen1248 (talk) 20:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  10:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you going to post some diffs or should I close this?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No response. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

24 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The same person created articles he already created with his other accounts like this Sebastián Solé, Evgeny Sivozhelez, Simone Buti and Aaron Russell. Mohsen1248 (talk) 12:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked and tagged (not checked). Pages that qualified under G5, I've deleted. Elockid <sup style="font-family:Chiller;">( BOO! ) 17:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

25 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This is definitely the same person, I have proofs for myself but won't write them here to not help him hide his future socks. he probably won't use this sock account anymore though as he already created couple more accounts. Mohsen1248 (talk) 11:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * As someone who follows this user I know him and his edits, I can't write all my proofs here since he will create more accounts in future but for the start, most of his socks were interested in Kalleh Mazandaran VC which he probably is a member of. now he crated Solico Group and Kalleh Dairy, one is already deleted for Unambiguous advertising or promotion, beside that his username is a bit similar to his other sock accounts you can see he use the thing "IR" in his other socks as well. Mohsen1248 (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  01:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * - Indeed, there is some large overlap in pages created by this suspect and previous sock. Please, compare him to, as that is the only non-stale sock as I know.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ matches to :
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Socks blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I was going to start a SPI for Jkouhyar as a probable sock of Irbox, who is already blocked indefinitely for copyright violations, when I started looking back at their contributions and saw some patterns that match this sockmaster's previous socks.

Copyvios and a refusal to accept Wikipedia policies around copyrighted text have been a recurring problem with these sock accounts, and both the current suspected socks have displayed that behaviour (see their current blocks, indef for Irbox and temporary for Jkouhyar). Since Iran has no copyright laws, or at least nothing that is similar to copyright laws in the US, there is a real obstacle to understanding and that needs to be bridged, but there is a limit to what we can do when a user simply refuses to listen... Looking more closely at Irbox, they have created articles previously created by User:Irmovies, a previously blocked sock of پارسا آملی, e.g. Kianoush Ayari and A Few Kilos of Dates for a Funeral. Jkouhyar has created The Blue-Veiled which was previously created by another sock, User:Mattewina.

The links between Jkouhyar and Irbox seem rather clear: compare talk page comments such as this and this from Irbox, with this and this from Jkouhyar, where there are distinct similarities beyond the fact that both accounts are clearly non-native speakers of English - also note similarities to e.g. these comments by an earlier sockpuppet. Edit warring and addition of unsourced content are also part of the behavioural pattern of both accounts (edit warring warnings can be seen on both talk pages, and Jkouhyar was briefly blocked for violating 3RR).

I can provide more diffs showing similarities between the accounts if necessary, but I don't want to turn this into a wall of text. bonadea contributions talk 20:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to each other, and to this sockmaster from a technical perspective. NativeForeigner Talk 18:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagged and closing. GABgab 02:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

New account that only edits same topic area of Iranian film. Recreated Kianoush Ayari which has been deleted twice now under G5 as creations by socks of پارسا آملی Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Correction: Account is not new, but has just started editing actively. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 07:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

I'd like to note that the account had also created House of Cinema, which was G5'd as well. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This new user appears to be watching this page. Also, the user was never notified of this SPI, yet came to comment. Does checkuser ping users? If it does, that seems like an oversight. If it does not, then that means the user was watching this page before the report, indicating that he is a sock. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 18:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I agree that the editing pattern, as well as their idiosyncratic use of English and their fondness for particular turns of phrase, looks very much like previous accounts. --bonadea contributions talk 09:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

1- Why his page was deleted before? What is illegal about it?

2- My name is Mobin and I'm not a suckpuppet!

3- I edit "same topic area of Iranian film" because cinema and especially my nation's cinema is one of my interests.

Thanks to Katie's (patrolling admin) comment about different UAs and operating systems I don't need to answer those false conspiracy theory sockpuppet claims.

Dear Vanjagenije, I have question for you. If a page was deleted before on Wikipedia, then no one has the right to create that page again in the future and anyone who creates the same page is a sockpuppet?

To answer "the user was never notified of this" I have to say anytime a user mentions my name, Wikipedia notifies me and as long as this investigation has been started on December 24th I have to check this page everyday to defend myself against those false claims. Mobin.rg (talk) 08:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare this account to previous socks.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * - Katietalk 14:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * . Geolocation is the same, but different UAs and operating systems. Katietalk 14:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Case closed with no action.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This user is re-creating the same articles as the sockpuppet with exactly the same attitude. I don't have the complete list of articles created by the master sock but I think you can check that, if I'm not wrong some articles like Mostafa Karkhaneh, Mohammad Mansouri (volleyball) were created by the sockpuppet before. the other user Tahamzd is already blocked for the same reason as the master sock. I want this one also being confirmed a sock then I can nominate all those articles for speedy deletion. Mohsen1248 (talk) 21:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

One more reason to confirm him as the sockpuppet, this edit here is more or less the same as this one by a confirmed sockpuppet. Mohsen1248 (talk) 21:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * This is a great insult. Mohsen1248 Based on habitual according to her claim more than 100 users without reason Were attributed پارسا آملی!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

Is this fair? check 2 or 28 November 2014 list, 06 May 2015 list, 03 September 2015... There was no relation to this user but it was blocked.. administer is in a dream and long sleeping. Cielesn (talk) 21:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Cielesn is ✅ to Tahamzd and is blocked and tagged.
 * The following accounts are socks. However, they may be socks in this case or in Sockpuppet investigations/Zahra 1369. The crossover both technically and behaviorally is significant. However, as I understand the behavior in this case, the behavior is more diverse, including Iranian entertainment-related articles, whereas at Zahra 1369 the focus is almost exclusively on Iranian entertainment-related articles. Next to each sock I have parenthetically listed my guess as to which master they belong to:
 * (this case)
 * (Zahra 1369)
 * (this case)
 * .--Bbb23 (talk) 23:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * to tag accounts and update Sockpuppet investigations/Zahra 1369 to document CU findings. Abecedare (talk) 23:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Tagged. Ne need to update the other case, tag is enough. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  07:11, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. Clearly the same person as پارسا آملی, a know sockpuppeteer on wikifa and commons as well as here. They are interested in the city of Amol (Solico Group(fa) being a company owned by one of their townsmen) and Volleyball (fa). N ight  <strong style="background-color: #ffffff; color: #2E2E2E;">D  11:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ to. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This user is re-creating the same articles the original sock created long time ago. at least I can say that about these two Behrouz Ataei and Mostafa Karkhaneh. Mohsen1248 (talk) 01:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Editing similar articles as edited by and created the Ali Sadeghi page which was previously created by Tenaciouss. Andrew Base (talk) 06:20, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The re-creation of Ali Sadeghi between and  contains the exact same content. Indef'd and tagged, closing SPI report...  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   06:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

It may seem unnecessary to report an IP as a sockpuppet ten days after they edited, but the IP created two drafts and submitted them to AfC, and those should be deleted per G5 rather than be allowed to take up reviwer time. One draft is Draft:Arsalan Ghasemi, which had been created by blocked sock User:Erfan Valizade Shiran. Arsalan Ghasemi has also been deleted per G5 as created by a sock of پارسا آملی, but I can't see who the creator was. The other draft is Draft:Ali Sadeghi, which has also been edited by CU-blocked User:Taha Forghani 1080 and User:Heydar moradi. See also this talk page post by the IP, cf this and this from two previous socks. bonadea contributions talk 14:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Sorry but this isn't going to happen. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Focuses on Iranian actors and sports people, with an overlap in editing with some previous socks of پارسا آملی, e.g. at Shila Khodadad (previous sock versus this account). Lots of edits such as this one and this one tally with e.g. this edit from a previous sock. Note also the user name Erfan valizade1, cf recent sockpuppets User:Erfan Valizade Shiran and User:Erfan shiran. bonadea contributions talk 15:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious open-and-shut case. Indef'd and tagged; closing SPI report...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Focus on Iranian actors and volleyball/football players. Their first edit was this, cf previous sock edits,.

They have been very much concerned with creating an article about the actor Tina Akhondtabar, which several previous پارسا آملی socks have also created (see logs for Tina Akhound-Tabar and Tina akhoondtabar, as well as Draft:Tina_Akhoondtabar). Sogand Kamranii's draft is currently at Draft:Tina_Akhondtabar. It is not terribly difficult to see stylistic similarities in e.g. these posts by old socks:, , and these posts by Sogand Kamranii: ,.

Another characteristic behaviour is seen here, cf edits by socks,. bonadea contributions talk 09:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . . Close. Dreamy <i style="color:#d00">Jazz</i> talk to me &#124; my contributions 09:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Lock request filed. The SandDoctor  Talk 16:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Overlap here with, recreated this by. They're also cu blocked as a sock of this user here under their alt which I've included. Praxidicae (talk) 12:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * would likely have more to add than en.wiki CUs on this. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * In fawiki, it was an obvious WP:DUCK. I haven't CU the user but I can do if it's needed.You can find more info on the user on index of "Mazandiran" in CU wiki. Ladsgroupoverleg 23:30, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * based on comment from Amir above, and overlap here. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

CheckUser-confirmed on the Farsi Wikipedia. Please note Special:Permalink/1055726826, which refers to a god like a previous sock. Recreation of Abdolhossein Navaei, Mahmoud Motaghedi, and Siraj Qumri. Requesting CheckUser to compare against prior cases on cuwiki and to keep the trail fresh Sdrqaz (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2021 (UTC)


 * TheresNoTime, can you (or the closing admin clerk) G5 their creations? They're Abdolhossein Navaei, Mahmoud Motaghedi, Moshar ul-Saltaneh, Siraj Qumri. had removed the db-banned tags as Volleysp470 wasn't blocked at the time, but now that's obviously moot. (I'm also quite sure that the text of G5 allows for deletion where the master is blocked but the sock isn't, but that's a conversation for WT:CSD). Sdrqaz (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
<span style="color:;"> 
 * - for training --Jack Frost (talk) 20:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * - CU confirmed on Farsi Wikipedia and per ' evidence. --Jack Frost (talk) 20:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * - ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 22:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * is ✅ per prior cases. ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 22:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
recreated Roozbeh Kiani by, Tayyeb Tabari (was previously under Abu'l Tayyeb Tabari) by , Siraj Qumri as Siraj Qumri Amoli by plus overlap here, here, here and pretty much every other edit they've made. <span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:12, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ from historic data. Will request lock, and sprinkle G5 dust.  Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( originally filed under this user)

EIA results are already too similiar for such few edits LacipetomvChamroshduty LacipetomvArashAbbasi9 LacipetomvPerse9s

One of these articles include Baduspan, a barely edited stub article created by me, which Lacipetom is disrupting by altering sourced info (pov-pushing)   just like Chamroshduty did    HistoryofIran (talk) 21:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * And won't you know it, reinstating edits after you and I told him that he's a sock. Magnatyrannus (talk &#124; contribs) 22:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Accuses me of "distorting history" just like Chamroshduty

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comment:Chamroshduty is still associated with a separate SPI Case, Sockpuppet investigations/Chamroshduty. Are they going to be merged? Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 02:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Now blocked. Tagged, closing. Seems obvious enough that there's no need for CU. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 22:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ...well, after I said that, tagged the account as a confirmed sock of . I'm not familiar with that case, and I'm unsure whether that means this filing should be moved to that case, or if both cases should be merged with each other.  Spicy (talk) 22:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * They're confirmed to (Quack! quack!) who is globally locked as a sock of . Do you want me to check Chamroshduty as well?--  Ponyo bons mots 22:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * , if it's not too much trouble, I would appreciate it - the cases seem fairly similar behaviourally, so if they are different based on the CU data I think it would be best to sort that out. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 23:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't wait for a reply. Geolcation is the same, but there are some technical differences. Maybe move this new report to Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی but leave everything else under Chamroshduty? -- Ponyo bons mots 23:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, done. There's already a lock request at SRG. Re-closing. Spicy (talk) 23:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Reinstated an edit from, a previous sock on the Mazandaran Province article. Magnatyrannus (talk &#124; contribs) 05:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Two edits four days ago. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( originally filed under this user)

Chamroshduty is from Mazandaran, as he openly claimed here. Pretty sure he claimed to be from the Mazandarani city of Amol on one of his other socks, though I can't currently find it. Amardions' name is literally a variant of the name "Amardi", the ancestor of the word "Amol". Amardions also openly said that he was from Mazandaran "I was born in Mazandaran"

And for the identical extremely bad behaviour of the two parties. There are A LOT of diffs to go by, so I'll make it short unless u want more;

Chamroshduty was notorious for being extremely nasty towards other issues, which was reported to WP:ANI and ended in his block. Amongst the things he accused me of, was "distorting" stuff;


 * "I write everything that is true. I do Not allow to distort and falsify the history of Iran"


 * "I warned you several times that I will Not allow you to distort the history of my region and city. I warn you to STOP fucking distorting the history of mazandaran,"

Amardions' also accuses me of "distorting" stuff. For some reason he is incredibly hostile towards me, a stranger;


 * "you can't distort the date and delete Amoli and Mazandarani's suffix."


 * "Insulting and slandering is your business. The basis of your work is destruction, insult and distortion. I answered all your questions. You know nothing about interaction, This is not a battlefield. I don't want to repeat it again. You asked and I answered that Khalifa Sultan is from the Marashian family of Mazandaran and has nothing to do with Isfahan. This is your work to distort history." HistoryofIran (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I can see that one of Chamroshduty's suspected socks was moved to Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی. Could this brand new user perhaps be related to this one instead? If you Ctrl + F the words "distort" and "Amol" in the SPI archive of پارسا آملی, they both appear. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

EDIT: Sure, I'll include the already mentioned stuff here as well;


 * 1) پارسا آملی having a sock with the extremely similar name of User:Amardian.
 * 2) Both accuses me of "distorting" stuff (پارسا آملی ) (Amardions )
 * 3) Both likes to talk about the "truth" (WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS) (پارسا آملی ) (Amardions )
 * 4) Both calls the Wikipedia guidelines (?) the "law" (پارسا آملی ) (Amardions )
 * 5) Both cries wolf by randomly claiming they have been "insulted" (پارسا آملی ) (Amardions  )
 * 6) They both have edited Ali ibn Sahl Rabban al-Tabari, Haydar Amuli and Bagher Larijani. Not the most popular articles to say the least, all of them also being from Mazandaran, two out of three being from Amol.
 * 7) They're obsessed with making edits related to Amol; (Amardions   ) / (پارسا آملی    ) --HistoryofIran (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
There are a lot of socks in this case, but every one I looked at, including the master, uses the mobile web platform and the visual editor. Amardions users neither.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's possible, but I'm not going to hang my hat just on the use of the word "distort". Could you provide some comparison diffs between Amardions and the socks in that case? That would help. While I'm here, though, I would note a username similarity between Amardions and sock .--Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * - With the additional evidence provided by HistoryofIran, I not only believe this report should be moved to Sockpuppet investigations/پارسا آملی, but I have also blocked Amardions without tags. After the report is moved, please tag Amardions as suspected and close. Although it appears to me that all the socks are stale, a check may be useful because of the confusion over masters not that long ago, and CU data may be available to help. However, unless the clerk feels otherwise, ultimately I don't feel a check is warranted. Bbb23 (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merged case from Sockpuppet investigations/Chamroshduty. Tagged and closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 13:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Spicy (talk) 13:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * 1) Account created on 18 March 2023. Latest sock was blocked on 4 March 2023 . Too much of a coincidence.
 * 2) They're both highly interested in making edits related to Amol (Ngsharif   ) and (پارسا آملی    )
 * 3) Both incredibly and randomly hostile from the get-go, using the word "destruction" in their attacks
 * 4) Neither of them understands how WP:RS works, resorting to usage of Persian-language newssites (Ngsharif ) and (پارسا آملی ) HistoryofIran (talk) 23:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 5) Both call the Wikipedia guidelines the "law"
 * 6) Both cry wolf by randomly claiming they have been "insulted"

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 *  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The SandDoctor Talk 18:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)