Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/জাবিরটটক/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Split off from Sockpuppet investigations/Dominicvai. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 10:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to one another per RoySmith at Sockpuppet investigations/Dominicvai. Behaviorally quite similar, but no obvious bad faith. I have left maq for all three users. awaiting replies.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 10:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a very strange case. The three accounts are, incredibly obviously based on editing style, the same person. I would call them all 100% behaviorally proven even without CU backing. While they have edited the same articles, they have not been used, as far as I can tell, to win any edit wars or anything else that crosses the line from misuse to abuse. Yet জাবিরটটক denies operating the other two accounts. I don't know why he would deny this. I don't know what he'd have to gain. Normally I indef the master in cases of outright deception, but I've never encountered a case before that had deception without any underlying abuse. I'm going to indef the two newer accounts, and going to block জাবিরটটক for two weeks, in hopes that this dissuades them from socking again. Not hugely optimistic, but I don't think I can justify an indef of someone who broke no policies up to the moment they denied the potentially good-faith misuse. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 00:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)