Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/李建兴/Archive

16 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:李建兴 was blocked July 2015 by User:Chillum under WP:CIR (specifically, for being "[un]willing and [un]able to communicate" with editors)- the TP history is extensive although not inexhaustive. Recently, User:Adsafe posted in the same language on 李建兴's page. Not so much that the language itself is suspicious, but Adsafe's other edits there (and why would he edit someone else's TP anyway?) were to blank the page -TWICE. With this EDIT, he translated his username. His language skills appear to be at the same level of competency (see his TP as it is here). Behaviourily, they post on the same topics (womens' football, for example), and have both both focussed on User:Qed237's TP as a social fourm (李建兴's here and Adsafe's here.); also, they both respond to notices by immediate removal (Adsafe: here and 李建兴's here. :Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  10:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I would like to add my support to this request and I actually opened Sockpuppet investigations/李建兴 for the same editor before spotting this SPI (with a space in the pagename after the slash). I copy my text from the other SPI:

''Same really poor English and also the first edits of "Adsafe" outside their own userspace was at my talkpage which was frequently visited by "李建兴". Now I spotted that "Adsafe" blanked the talkpage of "李建兴", indicating there are a relation between the two editors. The suspected sockmaster "李建兴" is currently indefinately blocked.''

It looks like the same editor to me. Qed237&#160;(talk) 13:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks very much User:Qed237, and eagle-eyes for spotting that space! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  13:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Comment: Just to add one more comment, maybe the page should be moved to name without space in case of future reports. I opened my with help from Twinkle which did not see this SPI and created a new SPI. It is very possible this SPI will not be found next time if the space is there. Qed237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 13:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes; but now this can't be moved while that other one is in article space! -so just waiting for that G7. Or this could be merged into that, couldn't it? <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  13:45, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That is out of my knowledge. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 14:12, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - 李建兴 is stale for CU purposes, so this investigation will have to rely on a behavioral analysis alone. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:09, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, I moved the case to the correct name. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The evidence is pretty clear that these two are the same person, and since the second account has met with the same fate as the first one, I'm closing this. If someone wants to tag the new account, that's fine. If not, that's fine as well. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)