Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/老山哥哥/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Single page editors and COIs. 老山 have almost exact username with master 老山哥哥, and after cleaning COI, Emma0924 revert to version by 老山 and then second socks Bookperson (or another staff from Coolpad) revert to same COI materials.

Associate company Le.com and LeEco had COI/Ad content before, so not sure is there any connected single page editors (socks) for those pages. Matthew_hk  t  c  22:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Single page editor and possible COI. Restore exactly the same unsourced product catalog section by 老山, which 老山 was the previous sock and self admitted COI. Matthew_hk  t  c  14:45, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing without action. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 20:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

No sure the single page editor and possible COI understood the policy of ban, socks and COI or not, the new possible socks restore another section contributed by self admitted COI-user 老山. Matthew_hk  t  c  15:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Man888888 is ❌. The IP has made only one edit, and it's fairly obvious who it is. I think we're being hit by users who are affiliated with the company, which is why I felt that semi-protection was the best way to deal with the problem. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)