Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/완젬스/Archive

20 April 2012

 * The request here is NOT to connect the username with the IP address. The request is to look for sockpuppet activity. IP is provided as an info. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 05:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Evidence "stolen" form Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

This users activity seems to be a part of a broader campaigning reminiscent of the similar cases such as the US Congress staff edits or lobbyist activity. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 21:02, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Edit summary is rather revealing: "antisemitism is OUR PROBLEM not yours (which is deservedly giving us a bad rap, but occutards are insufficiently intelligent to know not to talk negatilvely about Jews until OWS gets our antisemitism stigma back under control)"
 * Content just gets better: "There is a slew of policies such as fringe/undue weight/original research/verifiability/BLP/etc. which create a buffer zone of sorts to bog down the impetus of passionate editors such as yourself. It's just this way because of an election year, and after Nov 6th 2012 I will actually be the first person to reinsert the antisemitism stuff because it's inevitably the right thing to do. Thanks for your continued patience, tacit cooperation, and implicit understanding."
 * User_talk:Gandydancer
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject OWS

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

67.___.___.____ was my ip address. When I created a username in October, I didn't know how to move the talk page comments to my new talk page (with keeping the timestamps & edit history intact) so I just created a redirect back to my original talk page so that there would not be a loss in continuity. 완젬스 (talk) 22:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

(also for purposes of clarity--an admin moved my talk page earlier today from 67.___.____.____ to user talk:완젬스--I only got a username after a large edit history already--which I thought was more than 100 edits but now I'm not so sure--I thought I began editing before September)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU does not connect an IP to an account. Moreover, it is clear what's going on. I'm not an SPI clerk and I'm certainly not an expert, but it seems to me there's nothing more to do here. Drmies (talk) 00:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Marking as closed as a rather useless request. Even if the IP and 완젬스 are the same, there is no purpose of blocking an IP that has not edited in over 4 months. All the other issues mentioned above are being appropriately (though not necessary maturely IMO) discussed at ANI. --MuZemike 22:02, 21 April 2012 (UTC)