Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/-dantbh/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * - last edit on 2016-11-24
 * - last edit on 2016-11-08
 * - last edit on 2016-11-03
 * - last edit on 2016-07-31
 * - last edit on 2016-07-12
 * - last edit on 2016-07-09
 * - last edit on 2016-06-15
 * - last edit on 2016-06-11
 * - last edit on 2016-06-03
 * - last edit on 2016-05-13
 * - last edit on 2016-03-10 (blocked for user name)
 * - last edit on 2016-03-09
 * - last edit on 2016-03-04
 * - last edit on 2016-02-01
 * - last edit on 2016-01-11
 * - last edit on 2012-08-05 (blocked for user name)
 * - last edit on 2012-07-17
 * - last edit on 2010-06-12
 * - last edit on 2010-06-12


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Creation of numerous user sub-pages mostly describing the fictitious past (and future) concert tours of one "Daniel Bryan", who also (according to other user pages) has time to appear as an actor on Hollyoaks and Modern Family. User pages include:
 * User:Mydreamtour/sandbox
 * User:Sandraohara93/sandbox
 * User:Miss-da-meaner/sandbox
 * (The above are all linked to each other)


 * User:Danielfuinogl/sandbox
 * User:DBryanFestival/sandbox
 * User:BrusselSproutsAreScum/sandbox
 * User:Marmamia889/sandbox
 * User:BuffySummers12345/sandbox
 * User:PASTALOVERMATEWANK83
 * User:Wedding-dermot3/sandbox
 * User:Samsophia2/sandbox
 * User:Liezelmaringeee3/sandbox
 * Initial version of User:Closelickmaneouvre/sandbox
 * Initial edit of User:Shakeshakeme33/sandbox

The most active current account seems to be Danielfuinogl, though it's been blocked for two weeks by User:RickinBaltimore for disruptive editing. The different account overlaps are British pop music, the TV show Tattoo Fixers ‎, Lady Gaga, and the TV soap Hollyoaks and its characters, Calton | Talk 03:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * (reply to Bbb23) As you may or may not have noticed, each account has been listed, from the beginning, with the date of their last edits; hell, there're even in descending chronological order. The exact order of account creation seems to be irrelevant. Since I don't have the slightest idea of what constitutes "stale" -- not being a Checkuser and all -- a simple glance down the list should tell someone who actually knows -- like a Checkuser -- where the cutoff is, which is why it's in descending chronological order of last edit. --Calton | Talk 14:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Please determine which of these users is the oldest. Also, please mark each account that is. After you've done that, please decide whether to endorse or decline the CU request made by the filer. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * is oldest.
 * All accounts other than the following are based on public edits:
 * The oldest non- account is . Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * - Please, check those non-stale accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked without tags as I'm not sure how you want to handle the tagging.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Im quite sure is the master, so I moved the case and tagged confirmed accounts with dual tags. I also blocked and tagged some older accounts that are obvious enough.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  10:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * - Please, check those non-stale accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked without tags as I'm not sure how you want to handle the tagging.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Im quite sure is the master, so I moved the case and tagged confirmed accounts with dual tags. I also blocked and tagged some older accounts that are obvious enough.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  10:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked without tags as I'm not sure how you want to handle the tagging.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Im quite sure is the master, so I moved the case and tagged confirmed accounts with dual tags. I also blocked and tagged some older accounts that are obvious enough.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  10:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked without tags as I'm not sure how you want to handle the tagging.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Im quite sure is the master, so I moved the case and tagged confirmed accounts with dual tags. I also blocked and tagged some older accounts that are obvious enough.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  10:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked without tags as I'm not sure how you want to handle the tagging.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Im quite sure is the master, so I moved the case and tagged confirmed accounts with dual tags. I also blocked and tagged some older accounts that are obvious enough.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  10:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked without tags as I'm not sure how you want to handle the tagging.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Im quite sure is the master, so I moved the case and tagged confirmed accounts with dual tags. I also blocked and tagged some older accounts that are obvious enough.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  10:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked without tags as I'm not sure how you want to handle the tagging.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Im quite sure is the master, so I moved the case and tagged confirmed accounts with dual tags. I also blocked and tagged some older accounts that are obvious enough.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  10:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)