Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/188.158.111.73/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4, diff5, diff6, diff7, diff8 Akocsg (talk) 16:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

this is a complete false accusation.first, op tried to block me by convincing a modeartor then he opened this case just to prevent me from editing.the only reason why he did it just because i reverted his problematic changes and restored the content. op is just abusing term "vandalism" and wikipedia report system. is convincing an admin for witch-hunting a legit action? how another article called Turanism is related to my current edits? actually admins should warn this user for his behavior: 1. abusing report and warning features 2. false accusation and calling other users who don't agree with him as vandal and vandalism 3. multiple reverting 4. convincing an admin for unjustified block 5. mixing edit warring, false report and edits to reach his goal. for god's sake, compare our edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.158.111.73 (talk)


 * Those edits were made by you. The vandal's IP address is the same as the creator of the above comment. Also please end your comments with four tides ~ Thanks!LakesideMiners (talk) 16:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * did you really my comment? vandal? have you ever read the meaning of "vandalism"? how my edits are vandalism? show me how I vandalized the 3 articles. and i ask again how my edits are related to this board? all of those edits are mine, so what? what's the point of this report? 188.158.111.73 (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * it's a dispute between me and other editors in Turanism. that's all. and show me how i have vandalized 3 articles Bayandur Aq Qoyunlu and Dastan. is editing by ip illegal and not legit?188.158.111.73 (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Your IP range is "188.158.64.0 - 188.158.111.255". That covers all of the edits that you linked as well as your IP. As well as ALL of the suspected Sockpuppets  steppe where it does not belong is vandalism.  steppe dose not fit in the context of the article. LakesideMiners (talk) 17:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * what?! no offense but i think you are completely clueless about those edits and topics. let other admins check my edits and his edits. ok? and read my below comments. i said all of those ips belong to me. so what? it's not my guilt that my isp uses a dynamic range. did i break any rules? i don't think so.188.158.111.73 (talk) 17:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Nice. The IP account above just blurted out with his own words that it's him in the Turanism article. This case is even clearer now. Regards, Akocsg (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * nice what? there is a dispute between me and several other editors there. so how is related to your report? even your report is pointless because you just inserted the links of my edits. how using a dynamic ip is equal to sockpuppetry?188.158.111.73 (talk) 17:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * i really do not understand how anonymous editing is related to this board?! you know having a dynamic ip is not related to user but isp. i don't change my ip by myself. what wiki rules i have abused? my blanking in Turanism article is the restoring of a specific revision which other editors agree with me and there is only one user who continuously reverts our edits. and edit warring on the other 3 articles happened by the OP himself. SHOULD I REGISTER AN ACCOUNT???188.158.111.73 (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: A possible relation with blocked sockpuppet user User:WorldCreaterFighter / User:GoguryeoHistorian should be checked. Regards, Akocsg (talk) 17:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * "a possible relation ... should be checked". Again, nonsense and false accusation. prove that i'm related to those account. how i am related to them? which one of my edits are similar to them? just show admins our similar edits and explain them.188.158.111.73 (talk) 17:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The IP user is right Akocsg... You do need to show proof. LakesideMiners (talk) 17:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I am not sure about that one. I just wanted to mention it, in case it's correct. GoguryeoHistorian also pushed POV and made disruptive edits in Turkic related articles, inlcuding Turanism. See here. Should I rather delete it LakesideMiners? Regards, Akocsg (talk) 18:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No, Keep it. You have provided evidence. Let's get a CheckUser over here.LakesideMiners (talk)
 * he has failed to provide any evidences and how i'm related to blocked accounts. where are those evidences? "Let's get a CheckUser over here" per what?! neither him nor you didn't prove that the blocked accounts belonged to me. his report just consists of my edits. nothing more.188.158.111.73 (talk) 18:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * that clearly shows that you just abused both Sockpuppet investigations board and Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring to just BAN/BLOCK me. throwing two random nonsense reports and hoping admins block me so you can easily own the articles. multiple editors from multiple countries are involved in article Turanism. their edits are not related to me. our only similarity is we do not agree with this guy "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Maghasito"188.158.111.73 (talk) 18:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Question. How is a IP user so experienced with Wiki Markup? Also how come his IP has not changed yet? It changed quickly in the reports, but in all of his comments, it has stayed the same. I might be wrong on how IP addresses work though. Just a thought. LakesideMiners (talk) 18:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * you look like an inexperienced admin and seems you have chosen this case for your training/tutorial. do you think ip editors are stupid? you think using links and markups is a special skill which are limited to registered users? your answer: the same reason how i edit the articles and i know how to use the links. please stop posting irrelevant comments. i have answered to all of them. answer me: IS USING DYNAMIC IP IS AGAINST WIKIPEDIA RULES? SHOULD I REGISTER AN ACCOUNT?188.158.111.73 (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No It is not against the rules. Please don't shout. Also I am not an admin. Also I should of used the term new user. I did not mean that I thought you were stupid. I have been editing for about a month and I still struggle with markup sometimes. This is also getting out of hand. I have requested a check user.LakesideMiners (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * oh my god, then just stop it. this is not a tutorial page! you are completely clueless about the issues here.188.158.111.73 (talk) 18:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * This section is for USER comments. The  below section is for Admin comments. Lets remain calm everyone.LakesideMiners (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * posting irrelevant comments, derailing the report and using it like a sandbox/tutorial page is against both civility and rules.188.158.111.73 (talk) 18:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

IP's notes as admins see the op just submitted links to my edits, nothing more. Failed to provide evidences for what is my blocked account. it only shows my ip changed because it's dynamic and caused by isp. also his edit warring report has failed too. because he just abused report system to ban me while he himself involved in edit warring and disruption. i accept my edit warring and warning by the admin and i use talk pages of those articles. i would register an account to avoid further problems.188.158.111.73 (talk) 19:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * i accepted my mistakes (edit warring and etc) and admins' warnings to me. i would participate in talk pages and no more edit warring. i may create an account to avoid confusions. it's not my mistake that my isp uses dynamic/shared ip system. if i involve myself in such incidents again (ip or account), i accept block instantly.188.158.111.73 (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's clear that these IPs are under the same range by looking at the WHOIS information (see here).  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: I've blocked the user for 36 hours for making disruptive edits here and reverting LakesideMiners. This discussion already looks heated; I'm not going to start allowing reverts and edit summaries like that to slide here. I've told the user on their IP talk page that if they promise to stop this, I'll unblock him/her immediately.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The user has promised to stop reverting other editors here and to remain civil throughout this entire discussion, and I have unblocked him/her under this condition.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)