Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/190.161.134.66/Archive

27 October 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

An individual using the now blocked IPs and  has also been using the

following IPs:

These four IPs are currently unblocked and available for him to use. Earlier this month this person has used multiple IPs on the same talk pages, files for deletion boards, and during edit wars, possibly for the purpose of hiding his unflattering edit histories and possibly in an attempt to create artificial support. Evidence that these are sock puppets include spelling of the word "encyclopaedia" and, common issues in edits (citation placement)- ,  and , common pages edited , common language and tone used in edit summaries  and , IPs all located in same region of same country (Santiago, Chile).

This user has been blocked before several times for reasons that include: edit warring, disruptive editing, incivility, sock-puppetry, and block evasion. He has more than once admitted to intending evade blocks as well as succeeding in evading blocks. In addition to all this he has personally attacked several editors and admins with extremely foul and abusive language in particular while editing under the IP 190.161.134.66. Examples include calling several different editors "f**king idiots" after being repeatedly warned and calling an admin a "dopey c*nt" after being blocked for such behaivour. Perhaps most disturbing to me is the persistant use (also primarily under 190.161.134.66) of aggressive and abusive tones in his edit summaries over the most minor of edits and corrections, spouting off at times to apparently to no one in particular or to whomever was responsible for the content he was editing. In one case he entered four consecutive aggressive taunts in his edit summaries on the same page, without any provocation or anyone responding in between, arguing with apparently...no one! Like I said, disturbing, and I for one felt uncomfortable editing on pages he had anything to do with.

None of these IPs show any activity in the last couple weeks. Perhaps he has moved on. But personally I dont think any action would be too harsh even at this point. Trolling such as this should not be tolerated in my opinion. Racerx11 (talk) 01:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All but 186.*.*.* are from the same ISP and same geolocation. The 186 IP is from the same country though (Chile) and is the only static IP of the bunch there. That's all I can pull from the WHOIS info. Alexandria  (talk)  13:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * None of these IPs have edited in the past three weeks. They're all stale in terms of blocking. Relist here as necessary, or report to RFPP for page locks. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)