Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/1MDB Group/Archive

14 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All three users are involved in the re-creation of similar promotional article about 1MDB Airlines which has been deleted twice under A7 without any evidence it exist and is now at AfD
 * 1MDB Group has already been blocked for promotional edits.
 * Pak Lodin has already been blocked for disruptive editing. MilborneOne (talk) 21:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Arul Lodin has been blocked indefinitely as well. Also, the airline article page created should be deleted. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 04:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I indeffed Arul Lodin based on the username and edits. CU declined. Closing.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

17 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Involved in and disruptive behaviour at 1MDB Airlines, user has been blocked based on behaviour and user name similar to other socks, report for record purposes only. MilborneOne (talk) 15:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Wok Lodin has been tagged and blocked indef, closing case. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

23 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User is trying to add the airline "1MDB Airlines" back into Wikipedia where it's been deleted under a deletion discussion and as a copyvio. About a month ago, another user was doing the exact same thing and I'm not seeing a reason not to believe why this person might be that same person. I've forgotten the name of the sockpuppeteer which is why the name is "Unknown".  CatcherStorm    talk   17:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * You shouldn't open an SPI when you don't know the name of the alleged master. If you need assistance figuring it out, you can seek help. In this case, any administrator could have done what I did, which was to look at the history of the deleted article. You also should check your work before saving it. If you had, you would have seen that is a legitimate, registered account, so in effect you were accusing an innocent user of sock puppetry.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Arul Wok is ✅. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)